Shadowing Practice: Einstein and the Theory of Relativity | HD | - Learn English Speaking with Video
Kies een oefenmodus
Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.
508 zinnen
Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.
1
Who would have believed that one day we'd be able to see this image?
2
A black hole in the universe, a strange star from which no light or person can escape.
3
This image was calculated using the equations of general relativity.
4
A scientific theory of space and time developed 100 years ago.
5
A theory that was in turn praised, rejected, forgotten, and then rediscovered.
6
A theory that this black hole nearly killed.
7
My theory.
8
The theory of relativity is infamous for its difficulty.
9
I want to show that there's nothing peculiarly difficult about it.
10
Let me illustrate this with an example here.
11
Let's imagine that this piece of jelly is the space.
12
Then the presence of matter is to distort the space.
13
Einstein's theory of relativity does lead us into a very strange and unfamiliar path.
14
Relativity is perfectly intelligible to anybody who is willing to think.
15
In the 20th century, I was known by the name of Albert Einstein, and for my equation, E equals mc squared.
16
I sought to understand nature through mathematics.
17
I had a new vision of the architecture of the universe, and I expressed it in a theory, general relativity.
18
General relativity is a theory about gravity, the mysterious force that attracts stars and planets to each other.
19
For 250 years before my theory, gravity was the realm of the great scientist Isaac Newton.
20
My theory revolutionized the worlds of physics and mathematics.
21
Newton's theory of gravity, revolutionary in its scope and concision, had held water since the end of the 17th century.
22
It is fascinating to think that, to explain just a few changes to this law, everything had to be turned on its head.
23
And that is exactly what Einstein did.
24
His theory of gravity involves several major modifications.
25
Space is no longer straight, but curved, depending on the matter inside.
26
giving a position at a given time no longer makes sense.
27
Positions and times are intertwined, and geometry now has to be seen in four dimensions.
28
And we can't count on this equation here anymore.
29
It needs to be replaced by one with a radically different form.
30
First of all, I discovered that space and time were actually connected, working as one.
31
And matter, such as stars and planets, bends and curves this space -time.
32
That curvature is the gravitational field, obliging the planets to rotate around the Sun.
33
Nothing, not even rays of light, can escape the curvature.
34
All these discoveries were based on a single observation, that of freefall, known since Galileo, and which can even be observed on the moon.
35
In my left hand I have a feather, in my right hand a hammer,
36
and I'll drop the two of them here and hopefully I'll hit the ground at the same time.
37
I'll find proof that Mr. Galileo is correct.
38
I saw and understood freefall differently from all other people.
39
It guided me towards the curvature of space -time.
40
All I had to do was observe closely.
41
Einstein himself tells us about the moment when he understood
42
that this was the tool that would allow him to form his theory.
43
In 1907, he wrote, I was sitting at my desk in the patent office in Bern
44
when suddenly I thought that if somebody was in free fall they wouldn't feel their own weight, and I was surprised.
45
He realized that gravity has the property, and is the only force with this property, of disappearing as a result of its own effect.
46
And that if we are in free fall, and so under the effect of gravity, we feel like there's no gravity.
47
In my day, I was only able to experiment this idea through thought.
48
But 100 years later, the physicists of the 21st century have new tools, such as this tower in Germany,
49
which can create a vacuum that eliminates air resistance.
50
By dropping objects in capsules into the tower, we can see how, in free fall, our weight disappears.
51
In this experiment, we put two objects on a scale in this capsule which will be dropped into freefall in the tower.
52
The needles on both scales will fall back to zero, showing, albeit not particularly precisely,
53
how this apple and this one kilo weight fall in exactly the same way in the gravitational field.
54
So it looks like mass doesn't exist anymore, which may seem absurd, because if we're able to eliminate gravity, then does gravity exist?
55
Once sealed, the capsule will be raised to a height of 110 meters for a five -second free -fall in the vacuum.
56
So we have perfect conditions for every experiment that is done in weightlessness.
57
So for example, if we have some experiments for space, we can test the payload or the equipment in our facility.
58
Thank you.
59
You're welcome.
60
Here we have a view of the inside of the drop tube.
61
Okay, so three...
62
Then after one second, it will go.
63
Three, two, one...
64
Wow.
65
Impressive. So now...
66
I'm a launcher.
67
So now we have to search for the right time in the video for the right...
68
For the five seconds.
69
The five seconds.
70
Okay.
71
So this is...
72
Something is happening.
73
Okay, so now here we are during the free fall.
74
It's almost zero on both sides.
75
Gravity has disappeared.
76
You twerked?
77
Yeah.
78
Until now, this principle, the cornerstone of my theory, has proved watertight.
79
Nobody has been able to prove it wrong.
80
A team of French researchers is preparing to test the principle in space.
81
Their satellite microscope, set for launch in 2016, will orbit 700 kilometers above the Earth and provide an unprecedented precision of measurement.
82
But let's wait and see.
83
In science, the experiment is our sole judge.
84
Back in 1907, this idea, today known as the principle of equivalence, led me like a lighthouse in the night to rethink gravity.
85
I returned to Switzerland in 1912 after five years of work.
86
I returned to the city of my student days.
87
The two years I spent in Zurich would be the most important of my life.
88
I I was offered a professorship in physics at the Zurich Polytechnicum School, now known as ETH Zurich.
89
So here's an ETH.
90
One of my old university friends, Marcel Grossman, had become a professor there.
91
He was far better than me in geometry.
92
His notebooks inspired me on numerous occasions.
93
Impressive, no?
94
Yes, it's very detailed.
95
The fundamental properties of elliptic functions.
96
He was preparing to work for Einstein, without knowing it, obviously.
97
But that's what was going on.
98
It's really surprising.
99
I didn't think it happened like that.
100
What I would have done without Grossman, I really cannot say, because the mathematical obstacles before me seemed insurmountable.
101
General relativity made me work like a monomaniac.
102
To see if I was on the right track, I used a flaw in Newton's theory.
103
Newton's gravitational equation couldn't predict the precise orbit of Mercury around the Sun.
104
Mercury's perihelion, its closest point of the Sun during the year, shifted much too fast.
105
This was a perplexing problem that physicists and astronomers just couldn't crack.
106
He arrived at the definitive theories in November 1915.
107
Definitive in particular because he determined
108
Mercury's perihelion with incredible precision.
109
After all these years, I still remember those evenings spent with Marcel Grossman in this café on the River Limat, putting the world into equation.
110
Our discussions concerned not only our studies, but ranged far beyond, over all the topics that could interest young people who kept their eyes wide open.
111
It was here that my theory took form.
112
The key to describing gravity is the geometry of space -time.
113
So, for the objects present in the universe, you have to determine the gravitational field they create, namely the geometry of space -time.
114
To do so hinged on solving an equation that took me eight years to create.
115
I wrote it as follows g mu nu is equal to 8 pi g over c4 times t mu nu.
116
A single equation and just a few mathematical symbols to describe our universe.
117
Based on a mathematical hypothesis, he opened up a new path, one that is still relevant today.
118
It's incredible.
119
You could have thought that it wasn't going to work. But it did work.
120
And it was here that the theory started to take on a life of its own, to unveil properties of nature that nobody had foreseen.
121
Curved geometry implied that time didn't pass in the same way in all parts of the universe.
122
Gravity influences time.
123
The stronger the gravity field, the more time slows down.
124
This threw everybody, myself included.
125
In my day, it was impossible to test this prediction through experiments gravity on Earth is too weak
126
and its effects on time are imperceptible.
127
But technology having evolved, in your day, this difference in time can be measured with amazing precision.
128
The new atomic clocks in the basement of the Observatoire de Paris are the most precise clocks in the world,
129
a billion times more precise than a quartz clock.
130
Even at this level of precision, my theory still works.
131
The effect is true everywhere.
132
The universe does not tick to a huge universal clock, as Newton thought.
133
Each region of the universe has its own time.
134
Each galaxy and each solar system exists in its own space -time.
135
Looking at the universe involves looking at other times.
136
In 1915, with World War raging, the publication of the theory of general relativity went unnoticed, gravity being elsewhere.
137
But I did receive a letter, from the German physicist Carl Schwarzschild.
138
With my equations, he had succeeded in calculating the distortion of space -time generated by a star.
139
This was a titanic achievement, given that my equation breaks down into ten others, and each one of them had to be solved.
140
But his work exposed a sort of minor flaw in the equations that nobody noticed.
141
This flaw would later be called the Schwarzschild singularity.
142
With his solution, Karl Schwarzschild cleared the way for the mathematical exploration of the theory.
143
Unfortunately, this was to be the only letter I received from him.
144
He died in the war in May 1916.
145
The seemingly never -ending war prevented the circulation of scientific publications.
146
But a ray of hope came to me from Great Britain, where I was nevertheless considered an enemy.
147
In Britain in 1915, there was a British astrophysicist called Eddington,
148
who was a pacifist, who was not at war.
149
In fact, was still at his post in Cambridge.
150
Now, it so happens
151
that Eddington was one of the few people in Britain who was capable of understanding what Einstein was writing.
152
And he immediately grasped the significance of this general relativistic theory.
153
The best physical test to confirm my theory was to measure
154
if the rays of light reaching us from far away actually followed the space -time curvature.
155
The sun is the only close and available mass that can curve space -time in a significant manner.
156
But if the sun is in the sky, it is daytime and the distant stars are invisible.
157
Our only chance would be to photograph the starry sky during an eclipse.
158
The war ended in 1918 and the following year he travelled, he led an expedition which went in two parts,
159
part to the island of Príncipe, off the coast of Africa and to Brazil.
160
Weather wasn't totally favourable, the observations weren't brilliant,
161
but they were sufficient to show that light was bent in exactly the way Einstein had proposed.
162
And when he came back, Eddington did a number of presentations and huge popular lectures about this work
163
and I think in the English -speaking world that launched Einstein.
164
Eddington presented his results to the Royal Astronomical Society, standing before a large portrait of Newton that had sat there undisturbed for over two centuries.
165
Reportedly, the whole atmosphere of tense interest was exactly that of a Greek drama.
166
Napoleon and other great men of his sight, they were makers of empire.
167
But there is an order of men who get beyond that.
168
They are not makers of empires, but they are makers of universes.
169
When they have made those universes, their hands are unstained by the blood of any human being on earth.
170
Solomon made a universe which lasted 1400 years.
171
Newton also made a universe which has lasted 300 years.
172
Einstein has made a universe, and I can't tell you how long that will last.
173
After my theory was confirmed, I received invitations from around the world.
174
During one of my trips in 1921, I found out that I had been honored with a Nobel Prize for Physics.
175
Strangely, I didn't receive the prize for general relativity, no doubt still too controversial, but for my previous work.
176
There was little talk of my theory of relativity.
177
As Charlie Chaplin once said to me, they're cheering us both, you because nobody understands you, and me because everybody understands me.
178
When I was in Paris in 1922, people wanted me to talk about time.
179
I recall people talking about it more in philosophical salons than in scientific conferences.
180
The fact is, nobody there understood the slightest thing about my theory.
181
But my most vivid memory is of a conference at the Collège de France.
182
A French mathematician, Jacques Ademar, stood up and pointed at me threateningly, pointing out a supposed flaw in my theory.
183
He brought up the very mathematical flaw that had escaped me in Schwarzschild's solution.
184
That's the Schwarzschild solution from 1916.
185
If I understand correctly, r is the radius relative to a central point, namely a star?
186
Yes, it's a star and its mass is m.
187
OK, but you can see straight away that there's a problem.
188
because if I see a radius equal to 2 gm divided by c squared,
189
the coefficient here becomes zero, which isn't right.
190
And here you get 1 divided by zero equals infinity, which is even worse.
191
Your solution falls flat on its face.
192
That's exactly what Jacques Hadamard said to Einstein in Paris.
193
It was terrible for Einstein because here, obviously, we're talking about maths.
194
But think about physics, which, for example, determines the geometry around our sun, the sun in the solar system.
195
Imagine we send a satellite towards the sun.
196
What happens when the satellite gets to this point?
197
Does it stop?
198
Does it explode?
199
Or does it disintegrate?
200
And that must have been seen as a fatal blow to Einstein's theory, right?
201
It did pose a major problem for Einstein because his theory was supposed to determine the structure of space space -time, and for a particular solution,
202
he saw that there were places where the idea of space and the idea of time no longer made sense.
203
The end of the world in equation form.
204
That's right, the edge of the world, what we call the Schwarzschild singularity.
205
No doubt this all looks abstract to you, a few symbols on a blackboard.
206
But for me, this singularity was a real monster.
207
It resembled a sphere, an impenetrable black bubble, a place in the universe where time seemed to stop and where space no longer existed.
208
The sphere appeared at the center of all celestial objects, like a star.
209
Fortunately, after a few calculations, we discovered that for our Sun, the size of the singularity was just three kilometers, hidden inside.
210
For it to become visible in our solar system,
211
we would need to be able to condense the entire mass of the Sun into a three -kilometer sphere.
212
For astrophysicists then, the singularity remained imaginary.
213
But mathematicians had a serious problem on their hands.
214
Would it prove fatal for my relativity?
215
Soon, the entire community was talking about the singularity.
216
And apart from a few firmly convinced cosmologists, pretty much everyone dropped my theory.
217
These were hard times for Einstein.
218
After his glory days, when relativity was in all the newspapers,
219
when he was the star of the Parisian Salons and spent the 1920s traveling around the world, he was the most heralded scientist of the day.
220
But interest in his theory shrank dramatically and life for people working on relativity became difficult.
221
With Elsa, I moved to Kaput, near Berlin.
222
I took up sailing as a hobby.
223
Until the day when events forced me to leave my homeland in 1933, forever.
224
Dr. Einstein, who gave the world its biggest headache, is back in California again with with his wife.
225
They've been found all night in San Pedro Harbor.
226
The professor had a theory as to how they could land, but before he and the captain could figure it out,
227
the fog had all gone away.
228
Now he's going to the Institute of Technology in Pasadena to work with other distinguished scientists.
229
There his theory will be thoroughly discussed and analyzed, and if it is what he says it is,
230
why then everything will be all right, won't it?
231
Physicists were extremely wary and not very interested.
232
There was a certain amount of aggression, from physicists in particular, except for the people who believed in it, who were few and far between.
233
And then there were those who simply didn't want to try and get their heads around it.
234
The problem of singularity grew as the years went by.
235
The impenetrable sphere, hidden in the heart of the stars, remained an obsession, impossible to understand, to imagine.
236
The edge of the world.
237
Relativistic scientists working on the gravity of stars such as our Sun found that according to my theory, stars could die.
238
That really was the limit.
239
Because the theory appeared to say that in dying, the star imploded and its size reduced to approach that of its singularity.
240
So stars are born and live and die.
241
The sun's future history is fairly simple, not good for us on Earth.
242
The sun will go through several phases, including swelling then it will ultimately shrink to one of these white dwarfs
243
and will steadily cool thereafter, just stop producing energy, stop its fusion reactions, but still quite hot and cooling.
244
For a star that's much bigger than the sun, basically what happens is the core of the star collapses to make a neutron star.
245
The rest of the material suddenly finds it standing on nothing goes rushing down to get a foothold,
246
meets this very, very solid neutron star and bounces out.
247
And 90 or 95 % of the material of the star goes out and the other little bit remains.
248
This extremely dense neutron star with a radius of barely 10
249
kilometres is coming dangerously close to the Schwarzschild singularity sphere hidden in its centre.
250
The risk I immediately saw was that it could be discovered in the theory that stars could condense even further,
251
and their singularity escape from within.
252
The question that immediately comes to mind is, do we know any stars? stars whose Schwarzschild surface, the edge of the theory,
253
is on the exterior of the celestial body?
254
You would have made an excellent physicist, or even astrophysicist.
255
Can we find any solutions in which we have the star or the celestial body, and here, the Schwarzschild singularity?
256
Those are probably created from really massive stars.
257
Once that big star begins to run out of nuclear fuel, gravity wins, so the star shrinks.
258
That puts up the gravity at the surface of the star,
259
so it shrinks, which puts up the gravity at the surface of the star, so it shrinks.
260
And it shrinks right down.
261
And even the atoms, you know, things like this table and chair I made of, the atoms collapse and the nuclei collapse.
262
And if you believe
263
If you believe the theory, it collapses down to a point, which is zero radius.
264
Some people don't like these kinds of points and zeros, so that's debated, but it goes down to very,
265
very, very small, having been one of the biggest stars in the universe before.
266
And it's a black hole.
267
All of a sudden, mathematicians and physicists were telling me, Einstein, that the Schwarzschild singularity, the flaw in my theory,
268
could in reality exist in the real universe, stepping out of the world of mathematics like a magical sphere.
269
And a completely black sphere, a place where space and time disappear.
270
I didn't want to believe it.
271
For me, the singularity had to remain a mathematical hypothesis.
272
A star can't just cave in like that.
273
Cave in, not stretch, but implode.
274
It's not possible.
275
There's something unbearable about that.
276
Other people, in particular Eddington, thought there must be something wrong.
277
He thought there must be something wrong in the calculation, but if not, there had to be something wrong in the physics.
278
So he thought, you know, nature shouldn't behave like this.
279
But then, it is a strange way for nature to behave, which is very different from the sorts of things that one is used to.
280
The most extraordinary thing in all this was Einstein himself.
281
He didn't want to believe that the Schwarzschild singularity could really be manifested, so he set out to prove it.
282
The worst paper he ever wrote.
283
He took the conclusion he wanted to reach as the basis for these calculations.
284
The main result of my research clearly concluded that Schwarzschild singularities didn't exist in physical reality.
285
It really was a poor paper by Einstein, one of the worst, but we can forgive him because he did write some excellent ones too.
286
It was all too much for me.
287
My own theory had completely escaped my grasp.
288
Since the mathematicians had invaded the theory of relativity, I did not understand it myself anymore.
289
In the USA in the 50s, I was seen as a sort of fossil, made deaf and blind by the years.
290
Ultimately, I didn't mind that role.
291
It suited my temperament.
292
Shrouded in this mystery, I left our planet.
293
And I can guarantee you that the most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious.
294
The doubt persisted after my death.
295
The black hole continued to disturb.
296
A number of competing theories showed that it can't even exist because logically speaking,
297
a star cannot simply collapse to zero but the life of relativity would be changed by the 1960s and the British
298
according to Einstein's theory the black hole that results from the collapse of a star several times the master
299
Sun would be an object several miles in diameter but
300
if you say imagine the earth compressed right down until it
301
became a black hole the dimension would be a bit less than an inch something like that
302
That's the Earth.
303
The Earth would have to be compressed into that size to be a black hole.
304
Roger Penrose had, like myself in my day, ideas that came to him entirely unannounced.
305
At the time I was getting very interested in this, which was 1964, perhaps a little earlier than that,
306
and there was a lot of interest in gravitational collapse at that time.
307
Well, I was pondering over these issues at one time.
308
I was at this time at Birkbeck College, where I was a lecturer, and a colleague of mine,
309
Ivor Robinson, who also had an important influence in many aspects of gender relativity, and he was talking to me very excitedly about certain things.
310
I forget what they were, I'm afraid.
311
But we came to a road, and when we crossed the road, the conversation stopped and when we get to the other side,
312
instead of walking into a wall...
313
Yeah.
314
We...
315
I forget what I had, the idea I had, which was crossing the street here, you see.
316
Mm -hm.
317
And then he goes off later.
318
Yes.
319
And then I try to remember...
320
Yeah.
321
...why I feel happy.
322
Why do I feel happy?
323
I have no idea.
324
So I think, am I breakfast?
325
No. ordinary breakfast, so on, you see, all through the day.
326
And then think, aha!
327
I had this idea about how you could characterize
328
a collapse of a star to a point where it is gone too far, point of no return.
329
And this was a surface which I call a trap surface.
330
And this surface can be irregular,
331
can be not symmetrical, but it has a very curious property that the light on both sides is focused inwards.
332
And I knew I could use this condition to try to prove a theorem.
333
Roger Penrose put into an equation the black hole that had thwarted so many physicists before him, myself included.
334
He proved definitively that when a star collapses, all its constituent matter condenses into a single central point, an infinite density of matter,
335
a point where time stops.
336
Roger Penrose worked with some important people, and most decisively with the young physicist Stephen Hawking.
337
The two earned a medal from the Royal Astronomical Society for their work on black holes.
338
Well, I haven't seen this before.
339
Yes, proposal for the Eddington Medal, that's what it was, yes.
340
I talked to Stephen at that time, and we had quite a long discussion on the details of this type of argument.
341
And this had a big effect on what he did later.
342
He generalised the argument to cosmological situations, and then further on we got together and had a general theorem
343
which seemed to encompass pretty well all the things that had occurred earlier.
344
I'd been dead for 10 years, I think, and this time I had to accept that my theory predicted the existence of black holes.
345
Despite everything, even if the work of Roger Penrose was convincing,
346
nothing proved that these singular celestial bodies arising from the death of stars actually existed.
347
It was all purely theoretical.
348
But new means of astronomical observation were developed in the 60s.
349
And a young British scientist was to change her vision of the universe forever.
350
Her name is Jocelyn Bell Burnell.
351
Radio astronomy revealed new kinds of objects, things that did not look particularly conspicuous or spectacular to the optical astronomer.
352
My first two years were spent working in the field constructing a radio telescope.
353
By the time at the end of my PhD I could swing a sledgehammer, which was not a skill I expected to acquire, but I did.
354
We started observations in the summer of 1967.
355
And after about a few weeks of observing,
356
there was the first indication of a curious signal.
357
So then I turned my attention to this thing, which meant going out to the observatory each day just before the telescope turned to it,
358
switching to a high -speed recording, and it turned out to be this string of pulses, about one and a third seconds apart,
359
which was not something I expected, I have to say.
360
We hadn't known about anything like that.
361
We hadn't imagined that anything like that could exist.
362
But the universe doesn't change in a day.
363
Jocelyn Bell Burnell came under heavy criticism until she detected, after months of inflagging work, a second similar source.
364
Ha!
365
What's that?
366
That looks a bit like the first signal that we've been chasing.
367
That bit of sky will be seen by the telescope at 2 o 'clock in the morning.
368
It was very cold and the equipment wasn't working properly in cold weather.
369
It was some problem with the receivers.
370
And of course when I got there it wasn't working properly.
371
But I got it to work properly for five minutes
372
and it was the right five minutes as the telescope was looking in
373
that direction and it was the right beam setting and in came pulse pulse pulse pulse
374
and that for me was actually the the eureka moment the sweet moment
375
because you know it's not the equipment with the fault you know it's not interference
376
it really does begin to look like a new class of object, still don't know what.
377
Well, these signals that we're picking up are entirely new.
378
Nothing like this has been seen in radio astronomy before.
379
Here is a discovery which illustrates the universe is far more complex than we at present believe.
380
It's not showing any sign of tiring, which means it's got lots of energy,
381
which means it's big, but because it's going fast, it's small.
382
So it's big and it's small.
383
That didn't make sense for a while, until we got our questions a little sharper.
384
It's small in the sense of how wide it is, but it's big in the sense that it's got a lot of mass.
385
Not that it's physically big, but it's got a lot of mass.
386
And we can see with hindsight that these very, very dense stars, which are small and massive, actually explained it.
387
Jocelyn Bell Burnell had discovered a pulsar.
388
And everything seemed to suggest that a pulsar was a neutron star.
389
The remnants of the death of an extremely dense star, neutron stars are the closest thing to a black hole.
390
So my theory was right, and in the end, I was wrong to doubt it.
391
Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new.
392
It became clear then that all the theoretical hypotheses posited earlier on what was possible on how stars evolved,
393
how they died and how they can collapse to become neutron stars were true and correspond to phenomena in the real universe.
394
Which also meant that the next step, i .e that
395
if you have a dead star but one that is too massive to be a neutron star, and so according to Einstein's theory,
396
has to be a black hole was that black holes exist too.
397
And after the discovery of pulsars, the conceptual landscape changed and everyone considered it clear that not only did neutron stars have to exist,
398
but that black holes had to exist too, and that we would find them one day.
399
The gravity on a pulsar is very, very strong.
400
You've got the mass of the sun, thousand, million, million, million, million tons, all in a ball 10 kilometers across.
401
And this produces some curious effects, curious to our minds.
402
They're explainable by general relativity.
403
One is that the gravity bends light rays.
404
So if I look that way on the surface of the pulsar, I actually see over the horizon.
405
I see over the horizon in every direction.
406
And it also affects clocks.
407
If I'm on a pulsar and you can see my watch,
408
you see the second hand is making one tick every two seconds because the gravity has slowed the clock so much.
409
I can use my watch, take my own pulse, and it's okay.
410
But that's because the gravity has slowed my heart the same way, and my metabolism.
411
And actually, I have problems getting onto the neutron star, the pulsar, because as I come down to land,
412
I am pulled down by this very strong gravity but there's a very strong gradient of gravity.
413
The force on my feet is much stronger than the force on my head.
414
Your body gets stretched.
415
There's a technical term for this.
416
It's called spaghettification after spaghetti.
417
But actually the difference in force.. between the bottom of your body
418
and the top of your body is so strong, it breaks.
419
Your body gets pulled apart.
420
Your feet get pulled off your legs, your legs get pulled off your body, your head separates from your body,
421
and the different bits of your body drop onto the neutron star, one after the other.
422
So don't go there.
423
Not a healthy space.
424
The universe is far stranger than I dare to imagine.
425
The famous Schwarzschild singularity, an impenetrable sphere, actually represented the edge of a black hole.
426
But what actually happens if we try to cross it?
427
This surface has an extraordinary property.
428
It isn't material, and yet it separates space -time into two zones, each with different properties.
429
You can cross it in one direction and send light from the exterior to the interior,
430
but you can't send light from the interior to the exterior.
431
It's a trap you never get out of.
432
A black hole is above all a solution to the theory of general relativity.
433
It is a mathematical solution, a space -time configuration, a universe.
434
And the question is finding out if this solution actually corresponds to something in the physical world.
435
We aren't sure that black holes exist in the real universe.
436
There are strong signs, though they remain indirect.
437
But the entire evolution of astrophysics in the 20th century, the fact that stars are born and die,
438
that very dense dead stars exist such as neutron stars, and that neutron stars have a maximum mass,
439
all this strongly indicates that black holes must exist in the real universe.
440
Maybe we will find absolute proof in a few years.
441
Finally, my theory of general relativity has found its field of application.
442
It describes the infinitely large.
443
Astronomers today are following in the footsteps of Roger Penrose,
444
Jocelyn Bell -Burnell, Thibaut Damour and many others as they search for the existence hidden in the immensity of our universe.
445
Without relativity, there would be no
446
Big Bang theory, no relativistic astrophysics, and not even a scientific cosmology with which to speculate on the origin of our universe and its future.
447
That said, as always in science, each new discovery brings with it new questions.
448
And the black hole concealed yet another surprise over its horizon.
449
So if you go inside a black hole, you should find a point at its center,
450
because if a star collapses in on itself, it crosses the horizon.
451
But what does it do after that?
452
It collapses.
453
And what happens?
454
General relativity says that the fabric of space -time tears, and that a true space -time singularity now exists at the center of the black hole.
455
In other words, space -time has ceased to exist.
456
It gets swallowed by the whole.
457
And then that information is lost to the universe.
458
Now you see, this is not something people like.
459
I can see there's some feeling of unhappiness from you on this position point.
460
You're not unique in this, I may say.
461
And it's probably the majority of you amongst physicists now that the information somehow has to get back again.
462
Maybe into another universe, maybe gets out through some curious effects of quantum mechanics one way or the other.
463
Personally, I think it has to be lost.
464
Today, I enjoy watching all these relativistic scientists from afar as they try to resolve new mysteries.
465
From string theory and loop theory to non -commutative geometry and twisters, a number of ideas have emerged to try and go beyond my theory.
466
One such speculative idea has been developed by Carlo Rovelli.
467
General relativity works very well, but it clearly tells us that it doesn't work in the center of the black hole, where singularity takes hold.
468
And this is where we need quantum mechanics, and for which we have a theory of quantum gravity that should tell us what is going on.
469
What that theory tells us or suggests is that afterwards, it bounces out and boom.
470
Hold on.
471
If you say that it bounces out, then you should be able to see loads of little explosions everywhere.
472
So why don't you?
473
Exactly.
474
That's the magic of the theory.
475
Because if you were on the star and strong enough to resist all that pressure, then that rebound would be practically immediate, a few milliseconds.
476
Except that in general relativity, time passes at different speeds in different places.
477
In a black hole, that effect becomes enormous, very, very strong.
478
According to our calculations, a millisecond inside a black hole corresponds to billions of years outside.
479
So if this image is correct, what is a black hole?
480
It's a star that becomes extremely small, a Planck star, and then bounces out and explodes.
481
But seen from the outside, the whole thing happens in slow motion, extreme slow motion, taking billions and billions of years.
482
I think that a mystery lies at the heart of physics, A mystery that has yet to be solved.
483
And that mystery is the nature of time.
484
What really is the passing of time?
485
We've discovered that time is not universal as understood by Newton.
486
We've discovered that each person has their own time.
487
We've discovered lots of things about time.
488
But what really is the passing of time?
489
We don't know.
490
The theory my colleagues and I are working on,
491
loop quantum gravity, has a set of equations limited to general relativity in one case and quantum mechanics in another.
492
These equations are special because they have no time parameter in them.
493
So time is not a fundamental ingredient of the universe.
494
Obviously, as with all theories on quantum gravity, we are not sure because we have not yet to establish measurements providing the theory.
495
But I think that on the whole,
496
everyone is convinced that putting general relativity and quantum mechanics together changes something fundamental in our understanding of space and time.
497
To tell you the truth, I would never have wagered that a hundred years later, my theory would still be around.
498
I thought by this stage you would have replaced it with a better one.
499
Now you have to unite quantum theory with my theory of general relativity.
500
I'm convinced that this will once again revolutionize our vision of space and time, as my theory revolutionized the vision of Newton.
501
Isaac Newton, with Einstein, was able more than anyone else to see further,
502
to see more things and discover more things in the world.
503
In a letter he wrote at the end of his life, there's a beautiful sentence in which he says
504
that he doesn't know exactly how others will see him or how they will remember him, but he sees himself as a child on a beach,
505
playing with pebbles, a child who is happy because he has found some particularly beautiful pebbles
506
while in front of him lies the immense ocean of all the things he has yet to understand.
507
And I'm sure that Einstein shared that same sense of the immensity of all we have yet to know.
508
Thank you.
App downloaden
Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken
AI UitspraakScoor elke zin
IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid
WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op
WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt
FOR YOU
Aanbevolen Video
C15
41 zinnen
How Einstein changed time forever | Jim Al-Khalili for Big Think
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
440 zinnen
White holes and wormholes are probably real. Here's why.
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C13
279 zinnen
LET THERE BE... Voltage? | Maxwell's Equation #2 Explained for Beginners
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C11
296 zinnen
John Berger / Ways of Seeing , Episode 1 (1972)
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C1552 zinnen
The Professor Who Taught People How To Think (1962)
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
215 zinnen
This New Pyramid Theory Explains the Missing Evidence
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
234 zinnen
The Philosophy of Rick Sanchez
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
47 zinnen
We Found Galaxies Too Old for the Universe
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
238 zinnen
Cosmic Insignificance Theory: A Simple Idea That Will Change Your Life Forever
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
187 zinnen
Hellraiser, Bataille and Limit Experiences
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C11
71 zinnen
The Beginning of Everything -- The Big Bang
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C11
65 zinnen
Espacio y tiempo, una cuestión de lengua. Lera Boroditsky, psicóloga e investigadora
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les
Deze spreekles is gebaseerd op de video “Einstein and the Theory of Relativity”. Deze woorden komen het vaakst terug: theory, star, gravity, universe, hole. Deze video bevat 344 zinnen en 6304 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 49:02. De spreker praat in een gelijkmatig tempo van ongeveer 129 woorden per minuut, prettig om te shadowen. Slechts 80% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden, dus de woordenschat is pittig.
Belangrijke woorden in deze video
15 woorden uit de video die het leren waard zijn, met uitspraak en betekenis:
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| equation zelfstandig naamwoord | /ɪˈkweɪ.ʒən/ | vergelijking |
| collapse werkwoord | /kəˈlæps/ | instorten |
| sphere zelfstandig naamwoord | /sfɪɚ/ | bol |
| quantum zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈkwɑntəm/ | kwantiteit |
| mathematical bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˌmæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪ.kəl/ | wiskundig |
| geometry zelfstandig naamwoord | /d͡ʒiˈɑ.mə.tɹi/ | geometrie, meetkunde |
| clock zelfstandig naamwoord | /klɑk/ | teller, kilometerteller |
| physics zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈfɪz.ɪks/ | natuurkunde, fysica |
| experiment zelfstandig naamwoord | /ɪkˈspɛɹ.ə.mənt/ | experiment, proef |
| flaw zelfstandig naamwoord | /flɔ/ | barst, barstje |
| curious bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˈkjʊɹ.i.əs/ | nieuwsgierig |
| pulse zelfstandig naamwoord | /pʌls/ | pols |
| mystery zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈmɪs.t(ə.)ɹi/ | mysterie |
| observation zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˌɑbzɚˈveɪʃn̩/ | waarneming |
| horizon zelfstandig naamwoord | /həˈɹaɪ.zən/ | horizon, horizont |
Phrasal verbs die je zult horen
| Woord | Betekenis |
|---|---|
| find out werkwoord | ontdekken, onderzoeken |
| bring up werkwoord | opvoeden |
| come back werkwoord | terugkomen |
| get together werkwoord | samenkomen |
| go away werkwoord | weggaan |
| go off werkwoord | afgaan |
| go out werkwoord | naar buiten gaan |
| pick up werkwoord | oppakken, optillen |
Zinnen om te herhalen
Korte, volledige zinnen uit de video die je in alledaagse gesprekken kunt gebruiken:
- I didn't think it happened like that.
- You could've thought that it wasn't going to work.
- Would it prove fatal for my relativity?
- I didn't want to believe it.
- Why do I feel happy?
Grammatica in deze video
De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:
| Structuur | In de video |
|---|---|
| Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telt | has disappeared · has proved · has been |
| Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet | was calculated · was known · be turned |
| Betrekkelijke bijzinnen who / which + zin — extra informatie over een persoon of ding | anybody who is · capsule which will · people who kept |
Uitspraak om op te letten
De spreker gebruikt 67 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals didn't, can't, don't. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.
- De “th”-klanken: mathematical /ˌmæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪ.kəl/, mathematics /mæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪks/, theoretical /ˌθi.əˈɹɛt.ɪ.kəl/, hypothesis /haɪˈpɒθɪsɪs/, theorem /ˈθiərəm/
- De klanken “sh” en “zh”: equation /ɪˈkweɪ.ʒən/, observation /ˌɑbzɚˈveɪʃn̩/, precision /pɹɪˈsɪʒ.ən/, calculation /ˌkælkjuˈleɪʃn̩/, publication /ˌpʌblɪˈkeɪʃ(ə)n/
- Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: mathematical /ˌmæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪ.kəl/, geometry /d͡ʒiˈɑ.mə.tɹi/, experiment /ɪkˈspɛɹ.ə.mənt/, fundamental /ˌfʌn.dəˈmɛn.təl/, mathematics /mæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪks/
Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:
- Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: solve /sɒlv/, involve /ɪnˈvɑlv/, cave /keɪv/, curve /kɚv/, bend /bɛnd/
- /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: gravity /ˈɡɹævɪti/, collapse /kəˈlæps/, mathematical /ˌmæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪ.kəl/, mechanic /mɪˈkænɪk/, satellite /ˈsætəlaɪ̯t/
- /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: gravity /ˈɡɹævɪti/, guarantee /ˌɡæɹ.ənˈtiː/, glory /ˈɡlɔːɹi/, galaxy /ˈɡæl.ək.si/, forgive /fɚˈɡɪv/
Zo oefen je met deze video
- Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
- Spreek zin voor zin na op normale snelheid en herhaal elke zin tot je ritme gelijk is aan dat van de spreker.
- Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als equation, collapse, sphere.
Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?
Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.