Shadowing Practice: Détruire son identité - Learn English Speaking with Video

The destruction is always the solution.

We destroy each day.

We photoshopped our imperfections.

We retouched the parties that we didn't.

We can modify the ones that others wouldn't like.

We work our identity, we model her, we distill her.

We live only by destruction.

And if we were all in the works, sculpted by fear of not being loved?

Since our childhood, we have been conditioned to perceive ourselves as fixed individuals.

with a own essence which defines us permanently.

We ask ourselves: "Who do you want to be when you are big?"

Like if identity was a choice to be done once for all.

But this concept depends on a fundamental error.

We are never a single person through time.

Each moment of our lives changes our perception of ourselves.

What we thought was true in 10 years ago, is no longer today.

Our beliefs evolve, our preferences change, our values are defined.

However, we are attached to something of a illusion, a direct line that we tell to give sense to our existence.

But this thing exists only in our internal narrative not in reality.

This "remise en cause" of the existence of a permanent one had already been formulated by David Hume in the 18th century.

When we try to seize our identity in introspection, we find only a flow of perception, sensations, pensées, emotions, without noyaux immuables.

He speaks of a "faisal of perception" rather than a "moo" real.

He speaks of the idea that our consciousness of being ourselves, is just a mental construction, not a fixed essence.

Thank you.

Identity is not built in the void.

It is constantly shaped by the expectations and the judgments of others.

Each interaction allows us to adopt a particular social role.

We never behave like the same way with our parents, friends, colleagues or even the other people.

We learn from childhood to adapt to being accepted.

A child who express an impoverished opinion will always be mocked and corrected.

or even ignore it.

l 'incipant à remodeler sa pensée pour mieux correspondre aux normes du groupe.

This process continues throughout our lives.

We don't adopt a density.

We negotiate it in permanent with our entourage.

Michael Foucault also shows that our identities are also produced by discours and by systems of power more vast.

For example, the school, the justice, the medicine.

The institutions define norms and categories which influence deeply the way we perceive ourselves.

which means that we are not only façonnés by the explicit expectations of our entourage, but also by a whole ensemble of practices and discours that assigns us a role,

sometimes our insu.

Sartre, he, spoke of the wrong faith, This phenomenon where we play a role to respond to externalities.

We know at the bottom that we are not really what we pretend to be, but we still keep this game because it is necessary to survive in society.

In the contemporary world, we are dealing with several identities.

We have a numérique identity, façonned by social media, where we choose what we show and what we hide.

We also have a professional identity, which often asks us to mask our real personality to adopt a position conforme to our obligations.

We finally have an intimate identity, reserved to our friends, and even here we play roles.

Our identities are not only multiple.

They are sometimes contradictory.

We can be someone who is confident in appearance but deeply anxiously in private.

We can take values that we don't always respect.

We are puzzle -like pieces, and not homogeneous entities.

Baudrillard, in his theory of simulacres, explains that in a society that is full of representations and images, we are not living more reality, but an accumulation of masks and fiction.

Our identities are become roles that we perform rather than truths that we incarnate.

In the same vein, Deleuze and Guattari are talking about subjectivity as a assemblage of desires, of flow and representation rather than stable entity and closed.

Each social context, each interaction, even every digital platform our way of being We don't form a homogeneous block,

but a network of components that combine and that combine forever.

There is also another factor that is to save our illusion of identity: our own brain.

Our thoughts are not really ours.

Studies have shown that our brain takes decisions before we even have a conscious conscience.

The impression of having a free arbitre is finally an illusion.

Our memory can also be wrong.

We reconstruct our memories in terms of our emotions and our needs of the present.

What we believe are the main elements of our identity, for example our past experiences, are in reality part and often inexact.

And finally, our emotions are manipulated.

We often define our feelings.

I am an optimist, I am an anxious person.

But these states of life fluctuate constantly in terms of our hormones, our food, and even our sleep.

Especially our sleep.

If even our thoughts and memories are not fiables, how can we pretend to be a coherent and fixed individual?

If identity is an illusion, Why do we need to believe in the world?

and because this illusion is reassuring us.

We need a narrative file to give sense to our existence.

It's this file itself that allows us to make decisions.

to be projected to the future and to have stable relationships.

Identity is a social and biological structure, but it doesn't mean that it is void of sense.

It is a spark, even if it is in reorientation of a perpetual reorientation.

If we think that all this is an illusion, if the identity does not exist.

So, does it need to completely rebuild?

Faut -il effacer ce que nous croyons être pour ne laisser place qu 'à une forme de neutralité, à un moi sans contour, débarrassé des influences sociales et culturelles ?

The deconstruction of oneself is often inevitable step when we take into account of the artificiality of our identity.

But where do we go in this process?

Can we rebuild ourselves without us to lose entirely?

We often have the impression of making sure we have to make sure our personality through our experience but However, what we call construction is and often a series of renouncements.

We are not, we are not eliminated.

What we are doing is not the fruit of an expansion building, but of a selection, of a continuous selection between what is socially acceptable and what is not.

The fact of adapting to survive is often very representative of the human spirit.

It's ancré in us.

Dès l 'enfance, nous comprenons instinctivement que certaines facettes de nous doivent être gommées pour éviter le rejet.

There's always something unconscious that happens when we make an action that might be potentially well viewed by our children.

A child, too expressive, will end up with his emotions if he sees that his tears or his exuberance aggisent adults.

Same thing for an adult who will hide his opinions

or his feelings if he realizes that can be vulnerable to his moqueries.

Later, in the professional life, we learn to filter our ways of speaking.

our way of thinking to correspond to the implicit attempts of the work.

What we see as maturity or professionalism is in fact a suite of adjustments, of suppressions.

We run what we have to conform to the existing structures.

We are trying to do it a little bit.

We become calibrated, polished, ...debarrasser des éléments jugés déviants.

Mais dans tout ce processus, nous perdons parfois ce qui faisait notre singularité.

100

Social adaptation has a cost.

101

Each silence, each compromise, contributes to our own more neutral more interchangeable.

102

We are away from what we could be to conform to what we should be.

103

The fact of having a proper identity to each individual is actually a modern invention.

104

In traditional societies, the notion of an individual distinct was secondary compared to the belonging of a group.

105

We didn't become ourselves, we took a predetermined role in the family, the clan.

106

The identity was a prolongation of the traditions and the collective functions.

107

It is only with the events of modernity and liberalism that the quest of the "Moi" realness emerged as a existential necessity.

108

And this passage of an identity collective to an individual has had an effect on the side.

109

On the one hand, he freed us from the brokenness of tradition The other, he plunged us into an ongoing permanent anguish.

110

We are no longer defined by a rigid frame, but we are now charged to create ourselves.

111

in a world where the gaps are moving and where the objection to authenticity is omnipresent.

112

If we are entirely responsible for our identity, then each choice and each result becomes a existential question.

113

And this quest is a real labyrinth, a source of anxiety where we feel lost, incapable of defining us in a stable way.

114

The prise of conscience of artificiality of our identity can lead to a phase of deconstruction.

115

When we understand that everything we are are formed by external forces, the family, the culture, the biology, the social norms, and he becomes a tentative of wanting to erase everything,

116

to get rid of his influence to reach a pure soul.

117

...debarrassé de toute contamination. But that...

118

It is a danger.

119

If we push the reconstruction too far, we risk to find ourselves in the void.

120

Who are we once we have rebuilt all our illusions?

121

A being without repères, without structures, floating in an identity.

122

Or, an illusory identity is necessary to work in the world.

123

We need to be an anchor, a continuity, a minimum of coherence to act.

124

interagir, ou même exister.

125

The question is not "Doing -t -on se deconstruct", but rather "Jusqu 'o aller dans cette déconstruction ?" Déconstruire certains conditions can be liberating.

126

To be aware of the mechanisms that lead us, allows us to reappropriate a part of our existence.

127

But to rebuild without rebuilding, it's risk of no longer being nothing.

128

It's not to make a table rase, but rather to choose consciously what we want to keep.

129

what we want to abandon, what we want to reinvent.

130

It's precisely what the philosopher Jacques Derrida says about "déconstruction".

131

It is not to be looking for a so -called "fair" hidden behind all our identifiers, but to show that all discourse on the "so" is on the structures that may be re -re -re -question.

132

The deconstruction is therefore not a simple démantèlement destructeur, it is a constant work of putting in light of internal contradictions.

133

Autrement dit, il n 'existe pas de "fond ultime" de l 'identité à découvrir, mais plutôt un espace d 'ouverture pour se réinventer en permanence.

134

Mais peut -on exister sans modèle ?

135

Even in the norm, we always end up with structure around new models.

136

An individual who reject the traditional social conventions will end up with other groups who share their vision of the world.

137

We have a fundamental need of belonging.

138

All this is anc in us, as I've already said.

139

And even in the deconstruction, we seek unconsciously new forms of structure.

140

Finally, can we accept to be beings in transformation, without looking at afficher our "Moi" in a rigid space, or losing our infinite destruction?

141

you "La destruction est -elle la seule fois ?" "Est -ce qu 'on doit tout effacer jusqu 'à disparaître, renoncer totalement à toute identité de définition,

142

to reach a form of ultimate freedom.

143

If we are nothing stable, if our "I" is only an encherchewing of an ephemeral perception, How can we fully exist?

144

Does it embrace this absence of identity as a liberation?

145

or rather fight it in trying to define ourselves When we realize that our identity is an accumulation of roles and influences,

146

the temptation is to want to build up on new basis

147

to avoid the old version of us to create a version of us -mêmes that would be authentic.

148

We often talk about reinventing.

149

like if we could go from zero.

150

choose a new personality, to write a new chapter, ignoring everything that precedes us.

151

But it's a leurre.

152

We can't really rebuild ourselves in Ex Nihilo.

153

because even in the act of reinvention, we are constrained by our past experiences.

154

by the traces of our history.

155

to destroy an identity to build another It just makes the problem move.

156

We remain prisoners of the need to define ourselves to exist under a recognizable form, to have a conductor drive that gives us a coherence.

157

And even society can't stop completely.

158

It requires us to label, clear categories, Even the one who seeks to erase everything ends up seeing a new identity.

159

that of the individual in search of renewal, At least to live in complete autarcie, we must always be composed of structures that precedes and surpasses.

160

So if the reconstruction is an illusion, Can it move further and leave everything?

161

Until it's not to be able to find itself at all?

162

Bye.

163

The oriental philosophy, including the Buddhism, offer a radical alternative to this occidental definition of "so".

164

Instead of fighting for an identity, she teaches the principle of "non -soi".

165

From this vision, what we call "me" is just a flux of thought.

166

of experience in perpetual mutation.

167

and that reminds the theory of Hume that I mentioned earlier.

168

The attachment to identity is viewed as a source of suffering.

169

because it keeps us in an illusion of permanence which goes against the reality of the world.

170

Everything changes, everything is in constant evolution.

171

and to fix our being in a fixed definition, it's to fight against the nature of things.

172

But this approach is not always easy.

173

We have grown in a culture that values individuality, identity, Accepting that we are nothing stable can be deeply unstable.

174

How to interact with the world if we don't know who we are?

175

But the fact of accepting the impermanence of our identity It doesn't mean that we need to sink into the nihilism. or passivity.

176

It's not a negation of existence.

177

It's a more subtle and more lucid of it.

178

without being attached to an identity.

179

and in accepting that we are in constant transformation, we win in freedom.

180

We are no longer prison of our past, of our choices, of our expectations that we have fixed by ourselves.

181

We can't advance without an angst to lose our identity, because we know that we never really had one.

182

Grâce à tout ça, on peut voir aussi les autres sous un nouvel angle.

183

Si nous cessons de nous accrocher à notre propre identité, nous pouvons cesser d 'enfermer les autres dans des définitions fixes.

184

We become more tolerant against contradictions, and more open to the human complexity, and more inclined to accept that each is an being in constant invention.

185

This allows us to say

186

that the destruction of identity opens the way to an existence more spontaneous

187

and less entrainable by the rigid attacks that we impose ourselves.

188

The biggest illusion is not only to find out who I am, but to believe that there is a "me" who question the question.

189

Thank you you you Thank you.

190

you

✨ Recommend Video

224 sentences

On a mis une policière face à deux citoyens et ça ne s'est pas passé comme prévu.

Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students

55 sentences

the desire to simply not exist

University StudentsWorking Adults

336 sentences

The Mother Tongue Guilt: Why You Feel Like You're Losing Your Native Self

Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students

12 sentences

Tanya's Words :: The Irrationalism Of Humanity

IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students

Vocabulary and speaking notes for this lesson

This C1 speaking lesson is built on the video “Détruire son identité”. The speaker keeps coming back to these words: identity, ourselves, illusion. This video has 190 sentences and 2580 words to shadow. The speech runs for 15:11. The speaker talks at a natural 170 words per minute, close to everyday conversation. Only 74% of the words are among the 3,000 most common in English, so the vocabulary is demanding.

Key vocabulary in this video

The 15 most advanced words in the video, with pronunciation and meaning:

Word	Pronunciation	Meaning
illusion noun	/ɪˈl(j)uːʒ(ə)n/	A distortion of sensory perception where real stimuli lead to a false or misleading impression of reality.
nous noun	/nuːs/	The mind or intellect, reason, both rational and emotional.
rebuild verb	/ɹiːˈbɪld/	To build again or anew.
deconstruction noun	/diːkənˈstɹʌkʃən/	A philosophical theory of textual criticism; a form of critical analysis that emphasizes inquiry into the variable projection of the meaning and message of…
thud noun	/ˈθʌd/	The sound of a dull impact.
tout verb	/taʊt/	To flaunt, to publicize/publicise; to boast or brag about; to promote.
rigid adjective	/ˈɹɪd͡ʒ.ɪd/	Stiff, rather than flexible.
discourse noun	/ˈdɪs.kɔːɹs/	Expression in words, either speech or writing.
norm noun	/nɔːm/	That which is normal or typical.
expectation noun	/ˌɛk.spɛkˈteɪ.ʃən/	The act or state of expecting or looking forward to an event as about to happen.
void adjective	/vɔɪd/	Containing nothing; empty; not occupied or filled.
artificiality noun	/ˌɑː(ɹ).tɪˌfɪʃ.iˈæl.ɪ.ti/	The quality of being artificial or produced unnaturally.
coherence noun	/koʊˈhɪɹ.ən(t)s/	The quality of cohering, or being coherent; internal consistency.
contradiction noun	/ˌkɑːntɹəˈdɪkʃən/	The act of contradicting.
effacer noun		One who effaces.

Phrasal verbs you will hear

Word	Meaning
end up verb	To bring to a conclusion.
find out verb	To discover, as by asking or investigating.
hide behind verb	To use someone or something as a shield in order to avoid taking responsibility for something; to avoid attention by using someone or something as a shield.

Sentences worth repeating

Short, complete lines from the video that you can reuse in everyday conversation:

We retouched the parties that we didn't.
We can modify the ones that others wouldn't like.
We don't adopt a density.
We can take values that we don't always respect.
Can we rebuild ourselves without us to lose entirely?

Grammar in this video

The structures the speaker uses most, with the exact words from the video:

Structure	In the video
Passive voice be + past participle — the focus is on what happens, not who does it	being loved · have been conditioned · be done
Present perfect have/has + past participle — a past action that still matters now	have been conditioned · have shown · I've already said
Relative clauses who / which + clause — extra information about a person or thing	someone who is · one who seeks

Pronunciation to watch

The speaker uses 13 contractions and reduced forms, such as don't, can't, didn't. Say them the short way, as you hear them.

The “th” sounds: thud /ˈθʌd/, authentic /ɔˈθɛn.tɪk/
The “sh” and “zh” sounds: illusion /ɪˈl(j)uːʒ(ə)n/, deconstruction /diːkənˈstɹʌkʃən/, expectation /ˌɛk.spɛkˈteɪ.ʃən/, artificiality /ˌɑː(ɹ).tɪˌfɪʃ.iˈæl.ɪ.ti/, contradiction /ˌkɑːntɹəˈdɪkʃən/
Long words — get the stress right: deconstruction /diːkənˈstɹʌkʃən/, expectation /ˌɛk.spɛkˈteɪ.ʃən/, artificiality /ˌɑː(ɹ).tɪˌfɪʃ.iˈæl.ɪ.ti/, contradiction /ˌkɑːntɹəˈdɪkʃən/, homogeneous /ˌhoʊ.moʊˈd͡ʒi.ni.əs/

How to practise with this video

Listen to the whole video once without speaking and note the words you do not know.
Start at 0.75× speed, shadow it sentence by sentence, then go back to normal speed once it feels easy.
Record yourself and compare with the original, paying attention to words like illusion, nous, rebuild.

What is the Shadowing Technique?

Shadowing is a science-backed language learning technique originally developed for professional interpreter training and popularized by polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. The method is simple but powerful: you listen to native English audio and immediately repeat it out loud — like a shadow following the speaker with just a 1–2 second delay. Unlike passive listening or grammar drills, shadowing forces your brain and mouth muscles to simultaneously process and reproduce real speech patterns. Research shows it significantly improves pronunciation accuracy, intonation, rhythm, connected speech, listening comprehension, and speaking fluency — making it one of the most effective methods for IELTS Speaking preparation and real-world English communication.

Shadowing technique: read the full step-by-step guide →

Shadowing Practice: Détruire son identité - Learn English Speaking with Video

Reste en silence… Tu es déjà là où tu dois être !

Use Identity Shifting To Fix Your Past Traumas

Jacques Lacan in 10 Minutes

MICHÉA - Comment le libéralisme détruit les identités

La rebeldía, según Albert Camus

Love, Loss and Symbolic Death

How to Read Anyone Instantly – Nietzsche’s 18 Psychological Truths

The Art of Reinvention