Shadowing Practice: Détruire son identité - Learn English Speaking with Video
Ders oluşturuluyor...
1
The destruction is always the solution.
2
We destroy each day.
3
We photoshopped our imperfections.
4
We retouched the parties that we didn't.
5
We can modify the ones that others wouldn't like.
6
We work our identity, we model her, we distill her.
7
We live only by destruction.
8
And if we were all in the works, sculpted by fear of not being loved?
9
Since our childhood, we have been conditioned to perceive ourselves as fixed individuals.
10
with a own essence which defines us permanently.
11
We ask ourselves: "Who do you want to be when you are big?"
12
Like if identity was a choice to be done once for all.
13
But this concept depends on a fundamental error.
14
We are never a single person through time.
15
Each moment of our lives changes our perception of ourselves.
16
What we thought was true in 10 years ago, is no longer today.
17
Our beliefs evolve, our preferences change, our values are defined.
18
However, we are attached to something of a illusion, a direct line that we tell to give sense to our existence.
19
But this thing exists only in our internal narrative not in reality.
20
This "remise en cause" of the existence of a permanent one had already been formulated by David Hume in the 18th century.
21
When we try to seize our identity in introspection, we find only a flow of perception, sensations, pensées, emotions, without noyaux immuables.
22
He speaks of a "faisal of perception" rather than a "moo" real.
23
He speaks of the idea that our consciousness of being ourselves, is just a mental construction, not a fixed essence.
24
Thank you.
25
Identity is not built in the void.
26
It is constantly shaped by the expectations and the judgments of others.
27
Each interaction allows us to adopt a particular social role.
28
We never behave like the same way with our parents, friends, colleagues or even the other people.
29
We learn from childhood to adapt to being accepted.
30
A child who express an impoverished opinion will always be mocked and corrected.
31
or even ignore it.
32
l 'incipant à remodeler sa pensée pour mieux correspondre aux normes du groupe.
33
This process continues throughout our lives.
34
We don't adopt a density.
35
We negotiate it in permanent with our entourage.
36
Michael Foucault also shows that our identities are also produced by discours and by systems of power more vast.
37
For example, the school, the justice, the medicine.
38
The institutions define norms and categories which influence deeply the way we perceive ourselves.
39
which means that we are not only façonnés by the explicit expectations of our entourage, but also by a whole ensemble of practices and discours that assigns us a role,
40
sometimes our insu.
41
Sartre, he, spoke of the wrong faith, This phenomenon where we play a role to respond to externalities.
42
We know at the bottom that we are not really what we pretend to be, but we still keep this game because it is necessary to survive in society.
43
In the contemporary world, we are dealing with several identities.
44
We have a numérique identity, façonned by social media, where we choose what we show and what we hide.
45
We also have a professional identity, which often asks us to mask our real personality to adopt a position conforme to our obligations.
46
We finally have an intimate identity, reserved to our friends, and even here we play roles.
47
Our identities are not only multiple.
48
They are sometimes contradictory.
49
We can be someone who is confident in appearance but deeply anxiously in private.
50
We can take values that we don't always respect.
51
We are puzzle -like pieces, and not homogeneous entities.
52
Baudrillard, in his theory of simulacres, explains that in a society that is full of representations and images, we are not living more reality, but an accumulation of masks and fiction.
53
Our identities are become roles that we perform rather than truths that we incarnate.
54
In the same vein, Deleuze and Guattari are talking about subjectivity as a assemblage of desires, of flow and representation rather than stable entity and closed.
55
Each social context, each interaction, even every digital platform our way of being We don't form a homogeneous block,
56
but a network of components that combine and that combine forever.
57
There is also another factor that is to save our illusion of identity: our own brain.
58
Our thoughts are not really ours.
59
Studies have shown that our brain takes decisions before we even have a conscious conscience.
60
The impression of having a free arbitre is finally an illusion.
61
Our memory can also be wrong.
62
We reconstruct our memories in terms of our emotions and our needs of the present.
63
What we believe are the main elements of our identity, for example our past experiences, are in reality part and often inexact.
64
And finally, our emotions are manipulated.
65
We often define our feelings.
66
I am an optimist, I am an anxious person.
67
But these states of life fluctuate constantly in terms of our hormones, our food, and even our sleep.
68
Especially our sleep.
69
If even our thoughts and memories are not fiables, how can we pretend to be a coherent and fixed individual?
70
If identity is an illusion, Why do we need to believe in the world?
71
and because this illusion is reassuring us.
72
We need a narrative file to give sense to our existence.
73
It's this file itself that allows us to make decisions.
74
to be projected to the future and to have stable relationships.
75
Identity is a social and biological structure, but it doesn't mean that it is void of sense.
76
It is a spark, even if it is in reorientation of a perpetual reorientation.
77
If we think that all this is an illusion, if the identity does not exist.
78
So, does it need to completely rebuild?
79
Faut -il effacer ce que nous croyons être pour ne laisser place qu 'à une forme de neutralité, à un moi sans contour, débarrassé des influences sociales et culturelles ?
80
The deconstruction of oneself is often inevitable step when we take into account of the artificiality of our identity.
81
But where do we go in this process?
82
Can we rebuild ourselves without us to lose entirely?
83
We often have the impression of making sure we have to make sure our personality through our experience but However, what we call construction is and often a series of renouncements.
84
We are not, we are not eliminated.
85
What we are doing is not the fruit of an expansion building, but of a selection, of a continuous selection between what is socially acceptable and what is not.
86
The fact of adapting to survive is often very representative of the human spirit.
87
It's ancré in us.
88
Dès l 'enfance, nous comprenons instinctivement que certaines facettes de nous doivent être gommées pour éviter le rejet.
89
There's always something unconscious that happens when we make an action that might be potentially well viewed by our children.
90
A child, too expressive, will end up with his emotions if he sees that his tears or his exuberance aggisent adults.
91
Same thing for an adult who will hide his opinions
92
or his feelings if he realizes that can be vulnerable to his moqueries.
93
Later, in the professional life, we learn to filter our ways of speaking.
94
our way of thinking to correspond to the implicit attempts of the work.
95
What we see as maturity or professionalism is in fact a suite of adjustments, of suppressions.
96
We run what we have to conform to the existing structures.
97
We are trying to do it a little bit.
98
We become calibrated, polished, ...debarrasser des éléments jugés déviants.
99
Mais dans tout ce processus, nous perdons parfois ce qui faisait notre singularité.
100
Social adaptation has a cost.
101
Each silence, each compromise, contributes to our own more neutral more interchangeable.
102
We are away from what we could be to conform to what we should be.
103
The fact of having a proper identity to each individual is actually a modern invention.
104
In traditional societies, the notion of an individual distinct was secondary compared to the belonging of a group.
105
We didn't become ourselves, we took a predetermined role in the family, the clan.
106
The identity was a prolongation of the traditions and the collective functions.
107
It is only with the events of modernity and liberalism that the quest of the "Moi" realness emerged as a existential necessity.
108
And this passage of an identity collective to an individual has had an effect on the side.
109
On the one hand, he freed us from the brokenness of tradition The other, he plunged us into an ongoing permanent anguish.
110
We are no longer defined by a rigid frame, but we are now charged to create ourselves.
111
in a world where the gaps are moving and where the objection to authenticity is omnipresent.
112
If we are entirely responsible for our identity, then each choice and each result becomes a existential question.
113
And this quest is a real labyrinth, a source of anxiety where we feel lost, incapable of defining us in a stable way.
114
The prise of conscience of artificiality of our identity can lead to a phase of deconstruction.
115
When we understand that everything we are are formed by external forces, the family, the culture, the biology, the social norms, and he becomes a tentative of wanting to erase everything,
116
to get rid of his influence to reach a pure soul.
117
...debarrassé de toute contamination. But that...
118
It is a danger.
119
If we push the reconstruction too far, we risk to find ourselves in the void.
120
Who are we once we have rebuilt all our illusions?
121
A being without repères, without structures, floating in an identity.
122
Or, an illusory identity is necessary to work in the world.
123
We need to be an anchor, a continuity, a minimum of coherence to act.
124
interagir, ou même exister.
125
The question is not "Doing -t -on se deconstruct", but rather "Jusqu 'o aller dans cette déconstruction ?" Déconstruire certains conditions can be liberating.
126
To be aware of the mechanisms that lead us, allows us to reappropriate a part of our existence.
127
But to rebuild without rebuilding, it's risk of no longer being nothing.
128
It's not to make a table rase, but rather to choose consciously what we want to keep.
129
what we want to abandon, what we want to reinvent.
130
It's precisely what the philosopher Jacques Derrida says about "déconstruction".
131
It is not to be looking for a so -called "fair" hidden behind all our identifiers, but to show that all discourse on the "so" is on the structures that may be re -re -re -question.
132
The deconstruction is therefore not a simple démantèlement destructeur, it is a constant work of putting in light of internal contradictions.
133
Autrement dit, il n 'existe pas de "fond ultime" de l 'identité à découvrir, mais plutôt un espace d 'ouverture pour se réinventer en permanence.
134
Mais peut -on exister sans modèle ?
135
Even in the norm, we always end up with structure around new models.
136
An individual who reject the traditional social conventions will end up with other groups who share their vision of the world.
137
We have a fundamental need of belonging.
138
All this is anc in us, as I've already said.
139
And even in the deconstruction, we seek unconsciously new forms of structure.
140
Finally, can we accept to be beings in transformation, without looking at afficher our "Moi" in a rigid space, or losing our infinite destruction?
141
you "La destruction est -elle la seule fois ?" "Est -ce qu 'on doit tout effacer jusqu 'à disparaître, renoncer totalement à toute identité de définition,
142
to reach a form of ultimate freedom.
143
If we are nothing stable, if our "I" is only an encherchewing of an ephemeral perception, How can we fully exist?
144
Does it embrace this absence of identity as a liberation?
145
or rather fight it in trying to define ourselves When we realize that our identity is an accumulation of roles and influences,
146
the temptation is to want to build up on new basis
147
to avoid the old version of us to create a version of us -mêmes that would be authentic.
148
We often talk about reinventing.
149
like if we could go from zero.
150
choose a new personality, to write a new chapter, ignoring everything that precedes us.
151
But it's a leurre.
152
We can't really rebuild ourselves in Ex Nihilo.
153
because even in the act of reinvention, we are constrained by our past experiences.
154
by the traces of our history.
155
to destroy an identity to build another It just makes the problem move.
156
We remain prisoners of the need to define ourselves to exist under a recognizable form, to have a conductor drive that gives us a coherence.
157
And even society can't stop completely.
158
It requires us to label, clear categories, Even the one who seeks to erase everything ends up seeing a new identity.
159
that of the individual in search of renewal, At least to live in complete autarcie, we must always be composed of structures that precedes and surpasses.
160
So if the reconstruction is an illusion, Can it move further and leave everything?
161
Until it's not to be able to find itself at all?
162
Bye.
163
The oriental philosophy, including the Buddhism, offer a radical alternative to this occidental definition of "so".
164
Instead of fighting for an identity, she teaches the principle of "non -soi".
165
From this vision, what we call "me" is just a flux of thought.
166
of experience in perpetual mutation.
167
and that reminds the theory of Hume that I mentioned earlier.
168
The attachment to identity is viewed as a source of suffering.
169
because it keeps us in an illusion of permanence which goes against the reality of the world.
170
Everything changes, everything is in constant evolution.
171
and to fix our being in a fixed definition, it's to fight against the nature of things.
172
But this approach is not always easy.
173
We have grown in a culture that values individuality, identity, Accepting that we are nothing stable can be deeply unstable.
174
How to interact with the world if we don't know who we are?
175
But the fact of accepting the impermanence of our identity It doesn't mean that we need to sink into the nihilism. or passivity.
176
It's not a negation of existence.
177
It's a more subtle and more lucid of it.
178
without being attached to an identity.
179
and in accepting that we are in constant transformation, we win in freedom.
180
We are no longer prison of our past, of our choices, of our expectations that we have fixed by ourselves.
181
We can't advance without an angst to lose our identity, because we know that we never really had one.
182
Grâce à tout ça, on peut voir aussi les autres sous un nouvel angle.
183
Si nous cessons de nous accrocher à notre propre identité, nous pouvons cesser d 'enfermer les autres dans des définitions fixes.
184
We become more tolerant against contradictions, and more open to the human complexity, and more inclined to accept that each is an being in constant invention.
185
This allows us to say
186
that the destruction of identity opens the way to an existence more spontaneous
187
and less entrainable by the rigid attacks that we impose ourselves.
188
The biggest illusion is not only to find out who I am, but to believe that there is a "me" who question the question.
189
Thank you you you Thank you.
190
you
✨ Video Öner
C12
224 cümleler
Reste en silence… Tu es déjà là où tu dois être !
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
19 cümleler
Use Identity Shifting To Fix Your Past Traumas
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
81 cümleler
Jacques Lacan in 10 Minutes
University StudentsWorking Adults
C12
48 cümleler
MICHÉA - Comment le libéralisme détruit les identités
University StudentsWorking Adults
C1117 cümleler
La rebeldía, según Albert Camus
University StudentsWorking Adults
C13
30 cümleler
Love, Loss and Symbolic Death
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C12
347 cümleler
How to Read Anyone Instantly – Nietzsche’s 18 Psychological Truths
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
137 cümleler
The Art of Reinvention
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B22
581 cümleler
On a mis une policière face à deux citoyens et ça ne s'est pas passé comme prévu.
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C12
55 cümleler
the desire to simply not exist
University StudentsWorking Adults
C15
336 cümleler
The Mother Tongue Guilt: Why You Feel Like You're Losing Your Native Self
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C16
12 cümleler
Tanya's Words :: The Irrationalism Of Humanity
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
Bu dersin kelimeleri ve konuşma notları
Bu C1 seviyesindeki konuşma dersi “Détruire son identité” videosuna dayanıyor. En çok tekrarlanan kelimeler: identity, ourselves, illusion. Bu videoda gölgeleme çalışması için 190 cümle ve 2580 kelime var. Konuşma bölümü 15:11 sürüyor. Konuşmacı dakikada yaklaşık 170 kelimeyle, günlük konuşmaya yakın doğal bir hızda konuşuyor. Kelimelerin yalnızca %74’i İngilizcede en sık kullanılan 3.000 kelime arasında, bu yüzden kelime dağarcığı zorlayıcı.
Bu videodaki önemli kelimeler
Videodaki en ileri düzey 15 kelime, telaffuzu ve anlamıyla:
| Kelime | Telaffuz | Anlam |
|---|---|---|
| nous isim | /nuːs/ | nous, us |
| deconstruction isim | /diːkənˈstɹʌkʃən/ | yapısöküm |
| thud isim | /ˈθʌd/ | güm, pat |
| tout fiil | /taʊt/ | çığırtkanlık etmek, tiyo vermek |
| rigid sıfat | /ˈɹɪd͡ʒ.ɪd/ | katı, sert |
| discourse isim | /ˈdɪs.kɔːɹs/ | mubahase, söz |
| coherence isim | /koʊˈhɪɹ.ən(t)s/ | insicam, tutarlılık |
| entourage isim | /ˈɑn.tə.ɹɑʒ/ | anturaj |
| existential sıfat | /ˌɛɡzɪˈstɛnʃl̩/ | varoluşsal, egzistansiyel |
| precede fiil | /pɹɪˈsid/ | önce gelmek, önce gitmek |
| conform fiil | /kənˈfɔɹm/ | uymak |
| erase fiil | /ɪˈɹeɪs/ | silmek |
| perceive fiil | /pɚˈsiv/ | algılamak |
| reconstruction isim | /ˌɹiːkənˈstɹʌkʃən/ | yeniden imar |
| conscience isim | /ˈkɑn.ʃəns/ | vicdan, insaf |
Duyacağınız deyimsel fiiller
| Kelime | Anlam |
|---|---|
| find out fiil | anlamak, ortaya çıkarmak |
Tekrar etmeye değer cümleler
Videodan, günlük konuşmada yeniden kullanabileceğiniz kısa ve tam cümleler:
- We retouched the parties that we didn't.
- We can modify the ones that others wouldn't like.
- We don't adopt a density.
- We can take values that we don't always respect.
- Can we rebuild ourselves without us to lose entirely?
Bu videodaki dil bilgisi
Konuşmacının en çok kullandığı yapılar, videodaki sözcüklerin aynısıyla:
| Yapı | Videoda |
|---|---|
| Edilgen yapı be + fiilin üçüncü hâli — kimin yaptığı değil, ne olduğu önemli | being loved · have been conditioned · be done |
| Present perfect have/has + fiilin üçüncü hâli — geçmişte olan ama şimdi de önemli olan bir eylem | have been conditioned · have shown · I've already said |
| İlgi cümlecikleri who / which + cümle — bir kişi ya da şey hakkında ek bilgi | someone who is · one who seeks |
Dikkat edilecek telaffuzlar
Konuşmacı don't, can't, didn't gibi kısaltılmış biçimleri 13 kez kullanıyor. Bunları duyduğunuz gibi kısa söyleyin.
- “th” sesleri: thud /ˈθʌd/, authentic /ɔˈθɛn.tɪk/
- “sh” ve “zh” sesleri: illusion /ɪˈl(j)uːʒ(ə)n/, deconstruction /diːkənˈstɹʌkʃən/, expectation /ˌɛk.spɛkˈteɪ.ʃən/, artificiality /ˌɑː(ɹ).tɪˌfɪʃ.iˈæl.ɪ.ti/, contradiction /ˌkɑːntɹəˈdɪkʃən/
- Uzun kelimeler — vurguyu doğru yere koyun: deconstruction /diːkənˈstɹʌkʃən/, expectation /ˌɛk.spɛkˈteɪ.ʃən/, artificiality /ˌɑː(ɹ).tɪˌfɪʃ.iˈæl.ɪ.ti/, contradiction /ˌkɑːntɹəˈdɪkʃən/, homogeneous /ˌhoʊ.moʊˈd͡ʒi.ni.əs/
Türkçe konuşanların zorlandığı sesler:
- Kelime başındaki ünsüz kümesi — araya ünlü eklemeyin: precede /pɹɪˈsid/, mutation /mjuˈteɪʃən/, spontaneous /spɑnˈteɪ.ni.əs/, float /fləʊt/, clan /klæn/
- /æ/ — “e”den daha açık: artificiality /ˌɑː(ɹ).tɪˌfɪʃ.iˈæl.ɪ.ti/, contamination /kənˌtæm.əˈneɪ.ʃən/, attachment /əˈtæt͡ʃmənt/, clan /klæn/, adapt /əˈdæpt/
Bu videoyla nasıl çalışılır
- Videonun tamamını konuşmadan bir kez dinleyin ve bilmediğiniz kelimeleri not edin.
- 0,75× hızla başlayın, cümle cümle tekrar edin ve kolaylaşınca normal hıza dönün.
- Kendinizi kaydedin ve orijinaliyle karşılaştırın; nous, deconstruction, thud gibi kelimelere özellikle dikkat edin.
Gölgeleme Tekniği Nedir?
Gölgeleme, başlangıçta profesyonel tercüman eğitimi için geliştirilen ve çok dilli Dr. Alexander Arguelles tarafından popüler hale getirilen, bilim destekli bir dil öğrenme tekniğidir. Yöntem basit ama güçlüdür: ana dili İngilizce olan bir sesi dinler ve hemen yüksek sesle tekrar edersiniz — konuşmacıyı 1-2 saniye gecikmeyle takip eden bir gölge gibi. Pasif dinleme veya dilbilgisi alıştırmalarının aksine, gölgeleme beyninizi ve ağız kaslarınızı gerçek konuşma kalıplarını eşzamanlı olarak işlemeye ve yeniden üretmeye zorlar. Araştırmalar, telaffuz doğruluğu, tonlama, ritim, bağlı konuşma, dinleme anlama ve konuşma akıcılığını önemli ölçüde geliştirdiğini göstermektedir — bu da onu IELTS Konuşma hazırlığı ve gerçek dünya İngilizce iletişimi için en etkili yöntemlerden biri yapar.