Shadowing Practice: SOCRATE - Philosopher par le dialogue - Learn English Speaking with Video

Ders oluşturuluyor...
1
Socrates never wrote anything.
2
He professed a exclusively oral teaching, And all that we know of his thoughts has been reported by his disciples, in which Platon was given,
3
the author of "Dialogues Socratiques" which makes, by the way, It is sometimes difficult to differentiate what relates to Plato's thoughts or Socrates,
4
But still is it that The majority of the texts of Platon are the "mises in scene" of the dialogue of Socrate.
5
Socrate was first the king of provocation.
6
and the provocation was part of its method.
7
of his philosophy, And when I talk about provocation, I want to talk about provocation in the literal sense.
8
provoquer quelque chose, C create conditions for this thing to lie.
9
provoquer quelque chose, It's the fact MRG.
10
It leads to its event.
11
So the provocation is perhaps the word that sums up the best the philosophical practice of Socrates, tell qu 'elle se traduit à travers la maïotique.
12
So as I said, Socrate has never written any books.
13
It was not his way to do philosophy.
14
"Ecrire des livres".
15
Lui, They preferred to express themselves by conversation.
16
by the discussion, by dialogue.
17
He went to meet his citizens, Sur l 'Agora ?
18
and he would entame the discussion with them on a subject or on another.
19
And at this moment, He was going to put it in the middle of the day.
20
The thought in action.
21
He made the thought alive through dialogue.
22
It's to say that writing a book, It's exposing a thought of a fixed thought.
23
A thought about it or supposedly abouties.
24
A book is supposed to say that what is written is true.
25
and that the reader has no longer to read for instruction.
26
Autrement dit, There is in the philosophical book something very dogmatic.
27
And for Socrate, the dogmatism is precisely the antithesis of philosophy.
28
The philosophy cannot be expositioned.
29
It can't be something that we expose and that we have no longer to ingurgitate.
30
It's not that thought.
31
The nature of the thought is to be in movement.
32
It's always being built.
33
in the way to create.
34
For Socrate, the thought is a process.
35
The idea is to say that we don't pass directly from ignorance to knowledge.
36
We go through the steps, we go through the stages of knowledge, and each stage will lead to the next stage.
37
In the same way that when we learn math, we don't directly learn the second degree equations.
38
We start to learn how to count.
39
the positive numbers, And then we learn to add the numbers.
40
multiply, All right, divisez.
41
And so, from step by step, we arrive at mathematiques complex and abstract.
42
All learning is supposed to be steps.
43
And these steps need time.
44
They need to distance to what we learn.
45
Or for Socrate?
46
It is through dialogue that this distance of the thought can have a place.
47
And so, the dialogue appears as the best way to access the knowledge.
48
We will develop this idea in this video, but I would like you to remember this: For Socrates,
49
The exercise of the thought is an exercise of the thought.
50
L 'exercice de la pensée, It goes through the "mise in practice" of the thought.
51
And the practice of thinking is the formulation of the thinking, the verbalization of the thinking.
52
Autrement dit, La pensée en action, c 'est la pensée qui s 'exprime.
53
It's the thought in movement through dialogue.
54
For Socrates, it's the dialogue that allows the truth to be.
55
The truth is not a "list of annonces" a list of affirmations,
56
It's a process by which we replace our beliefs by knowledge.
57
And to come and get rid of our beliefs by knowledge, We need an interlocutor.
58
we need someone who will react to what we believe is true.
59
when we are all alone thinking about what we think.
60
we don't have a return to what we think.
61
which means that we can very well turn in a circle in our own own beliefs without ever going to go out.
62
even with the best will of the world.
63
We always need a reference.
64
We always need an external point of view.
65
The exterior point of view is the same.
66
It's what will allow us to make a return to our own thoughts.
67
It's what will allow us to enlarge our consciousness.
68
The consciousness can only be able to take care of the external points.
69
Otherwise, by the point of view which are not the nôtre.
70
There is no progress in the conscience, there is no elevation in the conscience, if there is no moment or another, in the way of being taken into account of the point of view of the other.
71
And the fact is that we are not able of understanding the point of view of autrui, if we don't confront ourselves.
72
if we don't have to do anything with someone.
73
in our expression expression.
74
When you ask someone advice, We are well aware that it does not mean that you will let the other think about your place.
75
It means that you have a conscience that you don't have all the information.
76
There may be an angle of view that you hit.
77
And it's normal.
78
Because we don't have all angles of view.
79
Our angles of view, They are the fruit of our personal life,
80
of our experience, of 1001 factors that have made our way of thinking.
81
Our way of thinking is, She is façonned by our living.
82
And when we take a conscience of that, When we understand that we don't have a science infuse, that we don't have the omniscience.
83
At this moment, we understand the role absolutely indispensable of the other in the construction of our thinking.
84
And that's what he believed in Socrates.
85
the idea that we needed the other to get into the consciousness.
86
to make progress our thinking.
87
D 'ailleurs, I'm going to say it in parentheses.
88
It's a good time today.
89
of consider that each has its own truth.
90
For Socrate, like for Platon, It doesn't exist.
91
We don't have each our own truth.
92
Because, by definition, the truth, "Elle est une".
93
and it is universal.
94
So each one has a truth, it doesn't have a sense.
95
It's not each one's truth, it's each one's conception of truth.
96
And that's very different.
97
It's very different because it puts in place the notion of subjectivity of knowledge.
98
The subjectivity of the knowledge doesn't mean that the truth is personal.
99
It means that each one has a look on the truth.
100
A bit like when you are on the road, and at a moment you have a panel that indicates a point of view.
101
You can stop at the end of the road and take advantage of a point of view on the landscape.
102
But from this point of view, It's your point of view.
103
and the people who are on the other side of the hill that you are looking at, these people have another point of view.
104
And it's the synthesis of all the views that, in a certain way, are the truth.
105
The truth is trans subjective.
106
It's the synthesis of subjectivity.
107
It's not the subjectivity itself.
108
The truth is not our point of view.
109
When you look at a "d", You don't see a "D".
110
You can see all the more three faces of the day.
111
Make an experience!
112
Look at the day.
113
and you will see that you only see three faces of the day.
114
Of course you know that the other faces exist, but you can't see them all at the same time.
115
That's the problem with subjectivity.
116
The problem of subjectivity is the problem that you have to do another subjectivity to respond.
117
And to complete, your own subjectivity.

Bu dersin kelimeleri ve konuşma notları

Bu C1 seviyesindeki konuşma dersi “SOCRATE - Philosopher par le dialogue” videosuna dayanıyor. En çok tekrarlanan kelimeler: view, Socrate, truth, subjectivity, dialogue. Bu videoda gölgeleme çalışması için 117 cümle ve 1306 kelime var. Konuşma bölümü 8:18 sürüyor. Konuşmacı dakikada yaklaşık 157 kelimeyle, günlük konuşmaya yakın doğal bir hızda konuşuyor. Kelimelerin %85’i İngilizcede en sık kullanılan 3.000 kelime arasında; geri kalanına başlamadan önce bakmakta fayda var.

Bu videodaki önemli kelimeler

Videodaki en ileri düzey 15 kelime, telaffuzu ve anlamıyla:

KelimeTelaffuzAnlam
subjectivity isim/ˌsʌbd͡ʒɛkˈtɪvɪti/öznellik
provocation isim/ˌpɹɑvəˈkeɪʃən/kışkırtma, provokasyon
conscience isim/ˈkɑn.ʃəns/vicdan, insaf
expose fiil/ɪkˈspoʊz/açığa çıkarmak
dogmatic sıfat/dɔɡˈmæt.ɪk/dogmatik, öğretisel
dogmatism isim/ˈdɔɡ.məˌtɪz.əm/dogmatizm, dogmacılık
formulation isimformüle etme
indispensable sıfat/ˌɪndɪˈspɛnsəbəl/elzem, zaruri
interlocutor isim/ˌɪn.təɹˈlɑk.jə.təɹ/muhatap
multiply fiil/ˈmʌltɪplaɪ/çarpmak
parenthesis isim/pəˈɹɛn.θə.sɪs/parantez, ayraç
profess fiil/pɹəˈfɛs/bir şeyi itiraf etmek
exposition isim/ɛkspəˈzɪʃən/sergileme, teşhir
conception isim/kənˈsɛpʃən/döllenme, aşılanma
subjective sıfat/səbˈd͡ʒɛktɪv/öznel

Duyacağınız deyimsel fiiller

KelimeAnlam
go out fiilçıkmak

Tekrar etmeye değer cümleler

Videodan, günlük konuşmada yeniden kullanabileceğiniz kısa ve tam cümleler:

  • It's what will allow us to enlarge our consciousness.
  • Because we don't have all angles of view.
  • D 'ailleurs, I'm going to say it in parentheses.
  • We don't have each our own truth.

Bu videodaki dil bilgisi

Konuşmacının en çok kullandığı yapılar, videodaki sözcüklerin aynısıyla:

YapıVideoda
Edilgen yapı be + fiilin üçüncü hâli — kimin yaptığı değil, ne olduğu önemlihas been reported · is written · cannot be expositioned
Present perfect have/has + fiilin üçüncü hâli — geçmişte olan ama şimdi de önemli olan bir eylemhas been reported · has never written · have made
İlgi cümlecikleri who / which + cümle — bir kişi ya da şey hakkında ek bilgisomeone who will · view which are · people who are

Dikkat edilecek telaffuzlar

Konuşmacı don't, doesn't, can't gibi kısaltılmış biçimleri 17 kez kullanıyor. Bunları duyduğunuz gibi kısa söyleyin.

  • “th” sesleri: synthesis /ˈsɪnθəsɪs/, antithesis /ænˈtɪθ.ɪ.sɪs/, parenthesis /pəˈɹɛn.θə.sɪs/
  • “sh” ve “zh” sesleri: provocation /ˌpɹɑvəˈkeɪʃən/, conscience /ˈkɑn.ʃəns/, affirmation /æfɝˈmeɪʃn/, omniscience /ɑmˈnɪʃəns/, exposition /ɛkspəˈzɪʃən/
  • Uzun kelimeler — vurguyu doğru yere koyun: subjectivity /ˌsʌbd͡ʒɛkˈtɪvɪti/, provocation /ˌpɹɑvəˈkeɪʃən/, philosophical /ˌfɪl.əˈsɑ.fɪ.kl̩/, antithesis /ænˈtɪθ.ɪ.sɪs/, dogmatism /ˈdɔɡ.məˌtɪz.əm/

Türkçe konuşanların zorlandığı sesler:

  • Kelime başındaki ünsüz kümesi — araya ünlü eklemeyin: provocation /ˌpɹɑvəˈkeɪʃən/, profess /pɹəˈfɛs/
  • /æ/ — “e”den daha açık: affirmation /æfɝˈmeɪʃn/, antithesis /ænˈtɪθ.ɪ.sɪs/, dogmatic /dɔɡˈmæt.ɪk/

Bu videoyla nasıl çalışılır

  1. Videonun tamamını konuşmadan bir kez dinleyin ve bilmediğiniz kelimeleri not edin.
  2. 0,75× hızla başlayın, cümle cümle tekrar edin ve kolaylaşınca normal hıza dönün.
  3. Kendinizi kaydedin ve orijinaliyle karşılaştırın; subjectivity, provocation, conscience gibi kelimelere özellikle dikkat edin.

Gölgeleme Tekniği Nedir?

Gölgeleme, başlangıçta profesyonel tercüman eğitimi için geliştirilen ve çok dilli Dr. Alexander Arguelles tarafından popüler hale getirilen, bilim destekli bir dil öğrenme tekniğidir. Yöntem basit ama güçlüdür: ana dili İngilizce olan bir sesi dinler ve hemen yüksek sesle tekrar edersiniz — konuşmacıyı 1-2 saniye gecikmeyle takip eden bir gölge gibi. Pasif dinleme veya dilbilgisi alıştırmalarının aksine, gölgeleme beyninizi ve ağız kaslarınızı gerçek konuşma kalıplarını eşzamanlı olarak işlemeye ve yeniden üretmeye zorlar. Araştırmalar, telaffuz doğruluğu, tonlama, ritim, bağlı konuşma, dinleme anlama ve konuşma akıcılığını önemli ölçüde geliştirdiğini göstermektedir — bu da onu IELTS Konuşma hazırlığı ve gerçek dünya İngilizce iletişimi için en etkili yöntemlerden biri yapar.

Shadowing tekniği: adım adım eksiksiz rehberi okuyun →