シャドーイング練習: SOCRATE - Philosopher par le dialogue - 動画で英語スピーキングを学ぶ

レッスンを作成中...
1
Socrates never wrote anything.
2
He professed a exclusively oral teaching, And all that we know of his thoughts has been reported by his disciples, in which Platon was given,
3
the author of "Dialogues Socratiques" which makes, by the way, It is sometimes difficult to differentiate what relates to Plato's thoughts or Socrates,
4
But still is it that The majority of the texts of Platon are the "mises in scene" of the dialogue of Socrate.
5
Socrate was first the king of provocation.
6
and the provocation was part of its method.
7
of his philosophy, And when I talk about provocation, I want to talk about provocation in the literal sense.
8
provoquer quelque chose, C create conditions for this thing to lie.
9
provoquer quelque chose, It's the fact MRG.
10
It leads to its event.
11
So the provocation is perhaps the word that sums up the best the philosophical practice of Socrates, tell qu 'elle se traduit à travers la maïotique.
12
So as I said, Socrate has never written any books.
13
It was not his way to do philosophy.
14
"Ecrire des livres".
15
Lui, They preferred to express themselves by conversation.
16
by the discussion, by dialogue.
17
He went to meet his citizens, Sur l 'Agora ?
18
and he would entame the discussion with them on a subject or on another.
19
And at this moment, He was going to put it in the middle of the day.
20
The thought in action.
21
He made the thought alive through dialogue.
22
It's to say that writing a book, It's exposing a thought of a fixed thought.
23
A thought about it or supposedly abouties.
24
A book is supposed to say that what is written is true.
25
and that the reader has no longer to read for instruction.
26
Autrement dit, There is in the philosophical book something very dogmatic.
27
And for Socrate, the dogmatism is precisely the antithesis of philosophy.
28
The philosophy cannot be expositioned.
29
It can't be something that we expose and that we have no longer to ingurgitate.
30
It's not that thought.
31
The nature of the thought is to be in movement.
32
It's always being built.
33
in the way to create.
34
For Socrate, the thought is a process.
35
The idea is to say that we don't pass directly from ignorance to knowledge.
36
We go through the steps, we go through the stages of knowledge, and each stage will lead to the next stage.
37
In the same way that when we learn math, we don't directly learn the second degree equations.
38
We start to learn how to count.
39
the positive numbers, And then we learn to add the numbers.
40
multiply, All right, divisez.
41
And so, from step by step, we arrive at mathematiques complex and abstract.
42
All learning is supposed to be steps.
43
And these steps need time.
44
They need to distance to what we learn.
45
Or for Socrate?
46
It is through dialogue that this distance of the thought can have a place.
47
And so, the dialogue appears as the best way to access the knowledge.
48
We will develop this idea in this video, but I would like you to remember this: For Socrates,
49
The exercise of the thought is an exercise of the thought.
50
L 'exercice de la pensée, It goes through the "mise in practice" of the thought.
51
And the practice of thinking is the formulation of the thinking, the verbalization of the thinking.
52
Autrement dit, La pensée en action, c 'est la pensée qui s 'exprime.
53
It's the thought in movement through dialogue.
54
For Socrates, it's the dialogue that allows the truth to be.
55
The truth is not a "list of annonces" a list of affirmations,
56
It's a process by which we replace our beliefs by knowledge.
57
And to come and get rid of our beliefs by knowledge, We need an interlocutor.
58
we need someone who will react to what we believe is true.
59
when we are all alone thinking about what we think.
60
we don't have a return to what we think.
61
which means that we can very well turn in a circle in our own own beliefs without ever going to go out.
62
even with the best will of the world.
63
We always need a reference.
64
We always need an external point of view.
65
The exterior point of view is the same.
66
It's what will allow us to make a return to our own thoughts.
67
It's what will allow us to enlarge our consciousness.
68
The consciousness can only be able to take care of the external points.
69
Otherwise, by the point of view which are not the nôtre.
70
There is no progress in the conscience, there is no elevation in the conscience, if there is no moment or another, in the way of being taken into account of the point of view of the other.
71
And the fact is that we are not able of understanding the point of view of autrui, if we don't confront ourselves.
72
if we don't have to do anything with someone.
73
in our expression expression.
74
When you ask someone advice, We are well aware that it does not mean that you will let the other think about your place.
75
It means that you have a conscience that you don't have all the information.
76
There may be an angle of view that you hit.
77
And it's normal.
78
Because we don't have all angles of view.
79
Our angles of view, They are the fruit of our personal life,
80
of our experience, of 1001 factors that have made our way of thinking.
81
Our way of thinking is, She is façonned by our living.
82
And when we take a conscience of that, When we understand that we don't have a science infuse, that we don't have the omniscience.
83
At this moment, we understand the role absolutely indispensable of the other in the construction of our thinking.
84
And that's what he believed in Socrates.
85
the idea that we needed the other to get into the consciousness.
86
to make progress our thinking.
87
D 'ailleurs, I'm going to say it in parentheses.
88
It's a good time today.
89
of consider that each has its own truth.
90
For Socrate, like for Platon, It doesn't exist.
91
We don't have each our own truth.
92
Because, by definition, the truth, "Elle est une".
93
and it is universal.
94
So each one has a truth, it doesn't have a sense.
95
It's not each one's truth, it's each one's conception of truth.
96
And that's very different.
97
It's very different because it puts in place the notion of subjectivity of knowledge.
98
The subjectivity of the knowledge doesn't mean that the truth is personal.
99
It means that each one has a look on the truth.
100
A bit like when you are on the road, and at a moment you have a panel that indicates a point of view.
101
You can stop at the end of the road and take advantage of a point of view on the landscape.
102
But from this point of view, It's your point of view.
103
and the people who are on the other side of the hill that you are looking at, these people have another point of view.
104
And it's the synthesis of all the views that, in a certain way, are the truth.
105
The truth is trans subjective.
106
It's the synthesis of subjectivity.
107
It's not the subjectivity itself.
108
The truth is not our point of view.
109
When you look at a "d", You don't see a "D".
110
You can see all the more three faces of the day.
111
Make an experience!
112
Look at the day.
113
and you will see that you only see three faces of the day.
114
Of course you know that the other faces exist, but you can't see them all at the same time.
115
That's the problem with subjectivity.
116
The problem of subjectivity is the problem that you have to do another subjectivity to respond.
117
And to complete, your own subjectivity.

コンテキストと背景

ソクラテスは、文書を残さなかったことで知られる哲学者です。彼の教えはすべて口頭で行われ、弟子たちによって記録されました。特にプラトンが著した「ソクラテスの対話」が、ソクラテスの思想を理解する重要な資料となっています。ソクラテスの哲学の中心は、対話を通じた思考のプロセスにありました。彼は市民と対話を交わすことで、知識を探求し、考えを発展させていきました。このような対話が、彼の哲学の核心であり、知識を得るための重要な手段であると考えられています。

日常コミュニケーションのためのトップ5フレーズ

  • サマリー:ソクラテスは知識を探求する過程を大切にしました。
  • 質問:あなたはそれについてどう思いますか?
  • 議論:それについてもっと詳しく教えてください。
  • 反応:なるほど、面白い視点ですね。
  • まとめ:要するに、私たちは常に学んでいるのです。

これらのフレーズは、英語スピーキング練習に役立ちます。特に「あなたはそれについてどう思いますか?」といった質問は、対話を深める良いきっかけとなります。

ステップバイステップ シャドウイングガイド

この動画の内容を理解するためには、以下のステップに従って練習しましょう。シャドウスピーチやシャドウスピーキングのテクニックを活用し、自然な会話を身につけましょう。

  1. まず、動画を視聴し、全体の内容を把握します。オーディオのリズムやイントネーションに慣れることが重要です。
  2. 次に、重要なフレーズを書き出し、それを声に出して練習します。例えば、「あなたはそれについてどう思いますか?」と反復することで、自然な会話の流れを作ります。
  3. 動画の音声を一時停止し、フレーズを繰り返し、自分の発音を改善します。自分の声を録音し、聞き返すことでさらなる改善につなげましょう。
  4. 最後に、実際に他の学習者や友人と対話を行い、この練習を実践に移します。このプロセスを通じて、英語スピーキングの自信を高めることができます。

このように、対話を通じて考えを深める練習は、英語スピーキング練習において非常に有効です。シャドウイングサイトを利用し、日々の練習を重ねることで、効果的な学びを実現しましょう。

この動画の文法

話し手がよく使っている文型を、動画の実際の表現とともに紹介します。

文型動画での表現
受動態 be + 過去分詞 — 誰がするかより、何が起きるかに焦点を当てるhas been reported · is written · cannot be expositioned
現在完了形 have/has + 過去分詞 — 過去の出来事が今も関係しているhas been reported · has never written · have made
関係詞節 who / which + 節 — 人や物について情報を加えるsomeone who will · view which are · people who are

シャドーイングとは?英語上達に効果的な理由

シャドーイング(Shadowing)は、もともとプロの通訳者養成プログラムで開発された言語学習法で、多言語習得者として知られるDr. Alexander Arguelles によって広く普及されました。方法はシンプルですが非常に効果的:ネイティブスピーカーの英語を聞きながら、1〜2秒の遅延で声に出してすぐに繰り返す——まるで「影(shadow)」のように話者を追いかけます。文法ドリルや受動的なリスニングと異なり、シャドーイングは脳と口の筋肉が同時にリアルタイムで英語を処理・再現することを強制します。研究により、発音精度、抑揚、リズム、連音、リスニング力、そして会話の流暢さが大幅に向上することが確認されています。IELTSスピーキング対策や自然な英語コミュニケーションを目指す方に特におすすめです。

シャドーイングのやり方: ステップ別の完全ガイドを読む →