Shadowing Practice: SOCRATE - Philosopher par le dialogue - Learn English Speaking with Video
Les maken...
1
Socrates never wrote anything.
2
He professed a exclusively oral teaching, And all that we know of his thoughts has been reported by his disciples, in which Platon was given,
3
the author of "Dialogues Socratiques" which makes, by the way, It is sometimes difficult to differentiate what relates to Plato's thoughts or Socrates,
4
But still is it that The majority of the texts of Platon are the "mises in scene" of the dialogue of Socrate.
5
Socrate was first the king of provocation.
6
and the provocation was part of its method.
7
of his philosophy, And when I talk about provocation, I want to talk about provocation in the literal sense.
8
provoquer quelque chose, C create conditions for this thing to lie.
9
provoquer quelque chose, It's the fact MRG.
10
It leads to its event.
11
So the provocation is perhaps the word that sums up the best the philosophical practice of Socrates, tell qu 'elle se traduit à travers la maïotique.
12
So as I said, Socrate has never written any books.
13
It was not his way to do philosophy.
14
"Ecrire des livres".
15
Lui, They preferred to express themselves by conversation.
16
by the discussion, by dialogue.
17
He went to meet his citizens, Sur l 'Agora ?
18
and he would entame the discussion with them on a subject or on another.
19
And at this moment, He was going to put it in the middle of the day.
20
The thought in action.
21
He made the thought alive through dialogue.
22
It's to say that writing a book, It's exposing a thought of a fixed thought.
23
A thought about it or supposedly abouties.
24
A book is supposed to say that what is written is true.
25
and that the reader has no longer to read for instruction.
26
Autrement dit, There is in the philosophical book something very dogmatic.
27
And for Socrate, the dogmatism is precisely the antithesis of philosophy.
28
The philosophy cannot be expositioned.
29
It can't be something that we expose and that we have no longer to ingurgitate.
30
It's not that thought.
31
The nature of the thought is to be in movement.
32
It's always being built.
33
in the way to create.
34
For Socrate, the thought is a process.
35
The idea is to say that we don't pass directly from ignorance to knowledge.
36
We go through the steps, we go through the stages of knowledge, and each stage will lead to the next stage.
37
In the same way that when we learn math, we don't directly learn the second degree equations.
38
We start to learn how to count.
39
the positive numbers, And then we learn to add the numbers.
40
multiply, All right, divisez.
41
And so, from step by step, we arrive at mathematiques complex and abstract.
42
All learning is supposed to be steps.
43
And these steps need time.
44
They need to distance to what we learn.
45
Or for Socrate?
46
It is through dialogue that this distance of the thought can have a place.
47
And so, the dialogue appears as the best way to access the knowledge.
48
We will develop this idea in this video, but I would like you to remember this: For Socrates,
49
The exercise of the thought is an exercise of the thought.
50
L 'exercice de la pensée, It goes through the "mise in practice" of the thought.
51
And the practice of thinking is the formulation of the thinking, the verbalization of the thinking.
52
Autrement dit, La pensée en action, c 'est la pensée qui s 'exprime.
53
It's the thought in movement through dialogue.
54
For Socrates, it's the dialogue that allows the truth to be.
55
The truth is not a "list of annonces" a list of affirmations,
56
It's a process by which we replace our beliefs by knowledge.
57
And to come and get rid of our beliefs by knowledge, We need an interlocutor.
58
we need someone who will react to what we believe is true.
59
when we are all alone thinking about what we think.
60
we don't have a return to what we think.
61
which means that we can very well turn in a circle in our own own beliefs without ever going to go out.
62
even with the best will of the world.
63
We always need a reference.
64
We always need an external point of view.
65
The exterior point of view is the same.
66
It's what will allow us to make a return to our own thoughts.
67
It's what will allow us to enlarge our consciousness.
68
The consciousness can only be able to take care of the external points.
69
Otherwise, by the point of view which are not the nôtre.
70
There is no progress in the conscience, there is no elevation in the conscience, if there is no moment or another, in the way of being taken into account of the point of view of the other.
71
And the fact is that we are not able of understanding the point of view of autrui, if we don't confront ourselves.
72
if we don't have to do anything with someone.
73
in our expression expression.
74
When you ask someone advice, We are well aware that it does not mean that you will let the other think about your place.
75
It means that you have a conscience that you don't have all the information.
76
There may be an angle of view that you hit.
77
And it's normal.
78
Because we don't have all angles of view.
79
Our angles of view, They are the fruit of our personal life,
80
of our experience, of 1001 factors that have made our way of thinking.
81
Our way of thinking is, She is façonned by our living.
82
And when we take a conscience of that, When we understand that we don't have a science infuse, that we don't have the omniscience.
83
At this moment, we understand the role absolutely indispensable of the other in the construction of our thinking.
84
And that's what he believed in Socrates.
85
the idea that we needed the other to get into the consciousness.
86
to make progress our thinking.
87
D 'ailleurs, I'm going to say it in parentheses.
88
It's a good time today.
89
of consider that each has its own truth.
90
For Socrate, like for Platon, It doesn't exist.
91
We don't have each our own truth.
92
Because, by definition, the truth, "Elle est une".
93
and it is universal.
94
So each one has a truth, it doesn't have a sense.
95
It's not each one's truth, it's each one's conception of truth.
96
And that's very different.
97
It's very different because it puts in place the notion of subjectivity of knowledge.
98
The subjectivity of the knowledge doesn't mean that the truth is personal.
99
It means that each one has a look on the truth.
100
A bit like when you are on the road, and at a moment you have a panel that indicates a point of view.
101
You can stop at the end of the road and take advantage of a point of view on the landscape.
102
But from this point of view, It's your point of view.
103
and the people who are on the other side of the hill that you are looking at, these people have another point of view.
104
And it's the synthesis of all the views that, in a certain way, are the truth.
105
The truth is trans subjective.
106
It's the synthesis of subjectivity.
107
It's not the subjectivity itself.
108
The truth is not our point of view.
109
When you look at a "d", You don't see a "D".
110
You can see all the more three faces of the day.
111
Make an experience!
112
Look at the day.
113
and you will see that you only see three faces of the day.
114
Of course you know that the other faces exist, but you can't see them all at the same time.
115
That's the problem with subjectivity.
116
The problem of subjectivity is the problem that you have to do another subjectivity to respond.
117
And to complete, your own subjectivity.
📺 Zelfde Kanaal
✨ Aanbevolen Video
C13
77 zinnen
PHILOSOPHY - Plato
British AccentDaily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B22
581 zinnen
On a mis une policière face à deux citoyens et ça ne s'est pas passé comme prévu.
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C11
303 zinnen
Ep. 01Genèse : premier ratage, ou comment dieu s'emmêle les pinceaux dans l'histoire de l'univers.
University StudentsWorking Adults
C11
81 zinnen
Jacques Lacan in 10 Minutes
University StudentsWorking Adults
C1117 zinnen
La rebeldía, según Albert Camus
University StudentsWorking Adults
C1118
21 zinnen
Impulse Control: The No You Never Practice (Epictetus)
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
224 zinnen
Reste en silence… Tu es déjà là où tu dois être !
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B22
35 zinnen
How to Use the Socratic Method (for Dialogue, Debate and Critical Thinking)
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C137
29 zinnen
Shakespeare: Hamlet
British AccentIELTS PrepTOEFL PrepCambridge Exam Prep
C1252 zinnen
Mes arguments philosophiques préférés
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepCambridge Exam Prep
C122
17 zinnen
Noam Chomsky on Language Aquisition
University StudentsWorking Adults
C13
154 zinnen
The Church Prevails – Bishop Barron's Sunday Sermon
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les
Deze spreekles op niveau C1 is gebaseerd op de video “SOCRATE - Philosopher par le dialogue”. Deze woorden komen het vaakst terug: view, Socrate, truth, subjectivity, dialogue. Deze video bevat 117 zinnen en 1306 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 8:18. De spreker praat in een natuurlijk tempo van ongeveer 157 woorden per minuut, dicht bij een alledaags gesprek. 85% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden; de rest kun je beter vooraf bekijken.
Belangrijke woorden in deze video
De 15 moeilijkste woorden uit de video, met uitspraak en betekenis:
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| subjectivity zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˌsʌbd͡ʒɛkˈtɪvɪti/ | subjectiviteit |
| provocation zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˌpɹɑvəˈkeɪʃən/ | provocatie |
| conscience zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈkɑn.ʃəns/ | geweten, gewisse |
| philosophical bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˌfɪl.əˈsɑ.fɪ.kl̩/ | wijsgerig, filosofisch |
| expose werkwoord | /ɪkˈspoʊz/ | zichtbaar maken, blootleggen |
| antithesis zelfstandig naamwoord | /ænˈtɪθ.ɪ.sɪs/ | antithese |
| disciple zelfstandig naamwoord | /dɪˈsaɪ.pəl/ | discipel |
| dogmatic bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /dɔɡˈmæt.ɪk/ | dogmatisch |
| dogmatism zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈdɔɡ.məˌtɪz.əm/ | dogmatisme |
| enlarge werkwoord | /ɪnˈlɑɹd͡ʒ/ | uitvergroten, vergroten |
| indispensable bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˌɪndɪˈspɛnsəbəl/ | onontbeerlijk, onmisbaar |
| interlocutor zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˌɪn.təɹˈlɑk.jə.təɹ/ | gesprekspartner |
| multiply werkwoord | /ˈmʌltɪplaɪ/ | vermenigvuldigen |
| omniscience zelfstandig naamwoord | /ɑmˈnɪʃəns/ | alwetendheid |
| parenthesis zelfstandig naamwoord | /pəˈɹɛn.θə.sɪs/ | parenthese |
Phrasal verbs die je zult horen
| Woord | Betekenis |
|---|---|
| go out werkwoord | naar buiten gaan |
Zinnen om te herhalen
Korte, volledige zinnen uit de video die je in alledaagse gesprekken kunt gebruiken:
- It's what will allow us to enlarge our consciousness.
- Because we don't have all angles of view.
- D 'ailleurs, I'm going to say it in parentheses.
- We don't have each our own truth.
Grammatica in deze video
De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:
| Structuur | In de video |
|---|---|
| Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet | has been reported · is written · cannot be expositioned |
| Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telt | has been reported · has never written · have made |
| Betrekkelijke bijzinnen who / which + zin — extra informatie over een persoon of ding | someone who will · view which are · people who are |
Uitspraak om op te letten
De spreker gebruikt 17 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals don't, doesn't, can't. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.
- De “th”-klanken: synthesis /ˈsɪnθəsɪs/, antithesis /ænˈtɪθ.ɪ.sɪs/, parenthesis /pəˈɹɛn.θə.sɪs/
- De klanken “sh” en “zh”: provocation /ˌpɹɑvəˈkeɪʃən/, conscience /ˈkɑn.ʃəns/, affirmation /æfɝˈmeɪʃn/, omniscience /ɑmˈnɪʃəns/, exposition /ɛkspəˈzɪʃən/
- Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: subjectivity /ˌsʌbd͡ʒɛkˈtɪvɪti/, provocation /ˌpɹɑvəˈkeɪʃən/, philosophical /ˌfɪl.əˈsɑ.fɪ.kl̩/, antithesis /ænˈtɪθ.ɪ.sɪs/, dogmatism /ˈdɔɡ.məˌtɪz.əm/
Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:
- Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: mise /miːz/, expose /ɪkˈspoʊz/, enlarge /ɪnˈlɑɹd͡ʒ/, infuse /ɪnˈfjuz/, subjective /səbˈd͡ʒɛktɪv/
- /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: affirmation /æfɝˈmeɪʃn/, antithesis /ænˈtɪθ.ɪ.sɪs/, dogmatic /dɔɡˈmæt.ɪk/
- /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: dogmatic /dɔɡˈmæt.ɪk/, dogmatism /ˈdɔɡ.məˌtɪz.əm/, ingurgitate /ɪnˈɡɜː.dʒɪ.teɪt/, ignorance /ˈɪɡ.nɚ.əns/
Zo oefen je met deze video
- Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
- Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
- Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als subjectivity, provocation, conscience.
Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?
Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.