シャドーイング練習: AI Will End Philosophy, Physicist Claims - 動画で英語スピーキングを学ぶ

レッスンを作成中...
1
A physicist has written a book explaining how artificial intelligence will make much of philosophy obsolete soon.
2
A philosopher thinks otherwise, and I think, well, they're both wrong.
3
Let me explain.
4
The new book comes from Louis Fervort, who started out with a PhD in physics, but then did a second PhD in philosophy.
5
So this isn't your stereotypical ignorant physicists with a YouTube channel.
6
You have me for that.
7
The book is titled Problem Solving in Philosophy, How to Do Philosophy in the Age of Ultra Intelligent AI.
8
To make a long story short, the author argues that philosophy should be done like in natural science in general, and like theoretical physics in particular.
9
As he writes in the book, quote, philosophy is now mature enough to come to reasonably solid answers to key problems,
10
And there's one overarching method to do so, in essence, the same method as the natural science is used to obtain answers,
11
in particular theoretical physics.
12
He argues that philosophers should quantify how good an explanation is by using
13
that explanation which gives the largest number of coherent answers to the well -posed problems.
14
He calls this the maximally coherent theory.
15
The best theory is the one that explains the most cases, makes sense of the most counterexamples and contradicts the least other accepted knowledge.
16
And AI can do it, so his argument, because all it really comes down to is counting the questions answered and contradictions.
17
He's even done an experiment in which he used AI to allegedly solve a thorny problem of philosophy.
18
That's how to define causality.
19
The experiment works like this.
20
Ask Chad GPT, at the time this was GPT -4, which notion of causality is the best.
21
Chad GPT said, counterfactual causality, which Fairbord thinks is correct because it's the one he also likes best.
22
Maybe doing philosophy like theoretical physics is not the flex he thinks it is.
23
Other philosophy topics that Fairbord thinks AI or cetera is free will, which clearly doesn't exist, and induction,
24
which he thinks is a pseudo -problem.
25
Though I have to add that he also says that he doesn't think AI will solve all philosophy problems.
26
In particular, he says big questions like the meaning of life or the existence of God are still up for grabs,
27
presumably until chat GPT 7 .8 Max Pro Ultra agrees with him.
28
The author published a paper with his main argument before the book, so we already have a comment from a philosopher titled,
29
can we automate philosophy through AI?
30
And we want to.
31
The philosopher basically says that if you think philosophy is about generating theories and arguing for and against them,
32
then yes, an AI can in principle do it.
33
If you, on the other hand, think philosophy is about thinking through these problems yourself, then an AI can't do it for you.
34
The remarkable thing about this argument is that he managed to blow it up to 15 pages, which is basically my problem with all philosophy literature.
35
Loads of words to say the pathetically obvious.
36
That said, I don't have much sympathy for the physicist's argument in this case either,
37
because the question of how to quantify the best explanation for a philosophical theory is itself a philosophical problem.
38
And the entire idea that you can science -ify philosophy is nonsense,
39
because philosophy is exactly what we use to discuss the questions that science cannot answer, or not yet.
40
There are, of course, questions that eventually move from philosophy to science.
41
Consciousness is just doing this, and free will is likely going to come next.
42
The problem with the author's argument is nicely illustrated in his take on the problem of induction.
43
That's the question of why induction works.
44
Why do the laws of nature continue to work?
45
Why does the sun rise every morning?
46
Why do atoms remain stable?
47
Why does Sabina keep making stupid jokes?
48
You might say, well, it's because we have seen in the past that that's the case.
49
Yes, but that'd be proving induction by induction, which is a circular argument.
50
Verwort basically says it's a meaningless question
51
because induction should be treated as an axiom and as such it doesn't require a justification.
52
But induction is an axiom in science.
53
We need it for science to work.
54
The question is why does it work?
55
That's a question science can't answer which is exactly why it's a question for philosophers.
56
If you say a non -scientific question isn't a question then yeah I guess you can close the philosophy departments
57
but even Claude could tell you that this is a pseudo -argument.
58
That said, I think both of these gentlemen missed the obvious point, which is that humans are by.. default lazy.
59
Most philosophy papers are already collections of useless words
60
that no one reads and of course increasingly more philosophers will let AI do this job.
61
Indeed, I'm sure this is already happening and I hope
62
that this will ultimately encourage philosophers to improve the quality of their discourse.
63
I give the book a 6 out of 10 on the bullshit meter.
64
Why is it so low after all I've said?
65
It's because I think that the method that the author suggests to quantify how good different explanations are is worthwhile.
66
I just don't think it's going to make philosophy redundant.
67
And if AI really does make philosophy obsolete, philosophers will spend the next 50 years debating whether that actually happened.
68
If you have a trip coming up, I have a recommendation for how you can make this
69
so much more convenient with the electronic SIM card or eSIM from Saley.
70
What's it good for?
71
If you're traveling, you can avoid roaming fees just by switching to a local eSIM.
72
That can save you a ton of money.
73
Something else that I found it useful for is to keep using an old phone which no longer has a SIM card.
74
You can also use it to set a virtual location.
75
How does it work?
76
It's super easy.
77
Download the app, select a country and a plan
78
and don't forget to enter my code ZABINA before checkout because that'll get you 15 % off.
79
Download the eSIM and switch it on and that's it.
80
Yes, it's really that simple.
81
Saley has 24 -7 support and if the eSIM doesn't work on your phone, a money -back guarantee.
82
So use my code ZABINA for an exclusive 15 % discount on Saley data plans and I wish you a good trip.
83
Thanks for watching.
84
See you tomorrow.
85
You

このレッスンの語彙とスピーキングのポイント

この動画には、シャドーイング用の文が85文、単語が1087語あります。 音声の長さは6:58です。 話す速さは1分あたり約156語で、日常会話に近い自然なペースです。 英語の頻出3,000語に含まれる単語は80%だけなので、語彙は難しめです。

この動画の重要語彙

動画に出てくる覚えておきたい単語15語を、発音と意味つきで紹介します。

単語発音意味
philosopher 名詞/fəˈlɑsəfɚ/哲学者
explanation 名詞/ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən/説明
physics 名詞/ˈfɪz.ɪks/物理学
argue 動詞/ˈɑɹ.ɡju/議論する, 論ずる
theoretical 形容詞/ˌθi.əˈɹɛt.ɪ.kəl/理論的な
solve 動詞/sɒlv/解決する
experiment 名詞/ɪkˈspɛɹ.ə.mənt/実験
obsolete 形容詞/ˈɑbsəlit/廃れた
topic 名詞/ˈtɑpɪk/話題, テーマ
stable 名詞/ˈsteɪ.bəl/馬小屋, 厩舎
encourage 動詞/ɪnˈkʌɹ.ɪd͡ʒ/勇気付ける, 奨励する
select 動詞/sɪˈlɛkt/選ぶ
guarantee 名詞/ˌɡæɹ.ənˈtiː/保証
obtain 動詞/əbˈteɪn/手に入れる, 取得する
discount 名詞/ˈdɪskaʊnt/割引, 値引き

動画に出てくる句動詞

単語意味
come up 動詞上がる, 登る

この動画の文法

話し手がよく使っている文型を、動画の実際の表現とともに紹介します。

文型動画での表現
関係詞節 who / which + 節 — 人や物について情報を加えるpages, which is · induction, which is · answer which is
現在完了形 have/has + 過去分詞 — 過去の出来事が今も関係しているhas written · have seen · I've said
受動態 be + 過去分詞 — 誰がするかより、何が起きるかに焦点を当てるis titled · should be done · should be treated

注意したい発音

話し手はdoesn't, don't, can'tなど、短縮形や弱形を17回使っています。聞こえたとおりの短い形で発音しましょう。

  • 「th」の音: theoretical /ˌθi.əˈɹɛt.ɪ.kəl/, sympathy /ˈsɪm.pəθ.i/, worthwhile /ˌwɜː(ɹ)θˈwaɪl/, pathetically /pəˈθɛtɪkli/, thorny /ˈθɔɹni/
  • 「sh」と「zh」の音: induction /ɪnˈdʌkʃən/, explanation /ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən/, artificial /ˌɑː.tɪˈfɪʃ.əl/, collections /kəˈlɛkʃənz/, notion /ˈnoʊʃən/
  • 長い単語(アクセントの位置に注意): philosopher /fəˈlɑsəfɚ/, explanation /ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən/, theoretical /ˌθi.əˈɹɛt.ɪ.kəl/, experiment /ɪkˈspɛɹ.ə.mənt/, philosophical /ˌfɪl.əˈsɑ.fɪ.kl̩/

この動画での練習方法

  1. まず声を出さずに動画を最後まで聞き、知らない単語をメモします。
  2. まず0.75倍速で一文ずつシャドーイングし、慣れてきたら通常の速度に戻します。
  3. 自分の声を録音して元の音声と比べます。philosopher, explanation, physicsなどの単語に特に注意しましょう。

シャドーイングとは?英語上達に効果的な理由

シャドーイング(Shadowing)は、もともとプロの通訳者養成プログラムで開発された言語学習法で、多言語習得者として知られるDr. Alexander Arguelles によって広く普及されました。方法はシンプルですが非常に効果的:ネイティブスピーカーの英語を聞きながら、1〜2秒の遅延で声に出してすぐに繰り返す——まるで「影(shadow)」のように話者を追いかけます。文法ドリルや受動的なリスニングと異なり、シャドーイングは脳と口の筋肉が同時にリアルタイムで英語を処理・再現することを強制します。研究により、発音精度、抑揚、リズム、連音、リスニング力、そして会話の流暢さが大幅に向上することが確認されています。IELTSスピーキング対策や自然な英語コミュニケーションを目指す方に特におすすめです。

シャドーイングのやり方: ステップ別の完全ガイドを読む →