シャドーイング練習: Mathematician Collapses All Functions to One Weird Formula - 動画で英語スピーキングを学ぶ
レッスンを作成中...
1
plus, minus, x times y, x to the power of y, sine and cosine.
2
Maths is full with complicated operations that you do to numbers.
3
An ambitious new paper now claims that actually you can do everything with only one operation.
4
That's quite a claim.
5
Maybe that finally explains why the Americans have only one math, where the Brits have maths.
6
I've had a look.
7
The new paper's a preprint that appeared on the archive the other week and comes from a mathematician in Poland.
8
The one operation
9
that he says can give everything is taking the exponential function of a number x minus the logarithm of another number y.
10
He calls that ML, short for exponential minus logarithm.
11
For example, if you put x and 1 into the ML function, you get e to the x minus log of 1.
12
Log of 1 is 0, so this gives you just the exponential function.
13
You can also get the logarithm itself back out.
14
For this, you first take ml of 1 and x, that gives you e minus log x.
15
Then you put that back into the first slot with another one.
16
So ml of ml 1 x 1, that gives e to the e over x.
17
And then you put that yet again into the second slot of ml with a 1 in the first.
18
If you work through the algebra, all the extra pieces cancel and you're left with just log of x.
19
So the same function gives you exponentials and logarithms indirectly.
20
But how do we get the standard operations, addition, subtraction, multiplication, etc.? They're all in there.
21
Take subtraction.
22
We just saw that you can express the exponential function and the logarithm through ML operations.
23
If you put those back into the ML function, what do you get?
24
You get x minus y.
25
You can also get a plus just by entering minus y.
26
And now you see you can put the sum of two logarithms into the exponent of the exponential function.
27
That'll give you multiplication.
28
And once you have multiplication, you can define powers and so on.
29
If you want to get trigonometric functions, you first need imaginary numbers.
30
You can get those from the logarithm at negative numbers, though there's a branch cut involved there.
31
I know that sounds like a gardening accident, but it just defines the logarithm for a negative number.
32
But once you have that, you get complex numbers, and you get sine and cosine and even the number pi.
33
What you do not get, for all I can see, is all real numbers starting from just 1 and 0, not without taking infinite limits.
34
But the author doesn't make that claim.
35
He says one can get all mathematical operations.
36
The paper hasn't yet been peer -reviewed, but I'm reasonably sure it's correct.
37
I saw a lot of people online worry about the arbitrary branch cut of the logarithm, but I don't think this matters.
38
Yes, you could choose it differently, and that it'd give you a different definition of complex numbers, but it'd still work.
39
Now, you may be wondering whether this is actually useful.
40
The answer is, for normal people, probably not.
41
No one's going to replace a normal calculator with one
42
that has a single deranged button that expects you to rebuild cosine by nesting 15 different operations.
43
The interesting part is structural.
44
In computer logic, there's a logical operation called NAND, which is enough on its own to build all the usual logical gates in a computer.
45
This paper's trying to find the analog for ordinary continuous maths.
46
The claim is that EML is kind of a NAND gate for scientific calculators.
47
And there is a possible practical angle.
48
If every ordinary formula can be rewritten as a tree made from one repeated building block,
49
then that gives you a very uniform way to search for formulas with a computer.
50
The author suggests this could be useful for symbolic regression, which means trying to guess the equation behind a set of data.
51
So this may be less about helping humans do maths
52
and more about giving machines a simpler language in which to search for equations,
53
which is nice because if the machines are going to take over science, then at least they will do it in an orderly manner.
54
I give this paper a 0 out of 10 on the bullshit meter.
55
It's a cute paper.
56
I think that the point isn't super surprising to anyone, but it is surprising that no one has done it before.
57
There are two ways one can look at this result.
58
One is that mathematics appears more complicated than it is.
59
The other way to look at it is that what we think of as complicated is very subjective.
60
You could rightfully argue that maybe using 10 or
61
so different operations is easier than nesting just one operation 20 times in itself.
62
In the end, it depends on just how you quantify simplicity.
63
This is also an issue that haunts the foundations of physics, because what really do we mean when we say
64
that simple explanations are better if we don't agree on how to measure simplicity?
65
Or maybe it just tells us that mathematicians have too much time.
66
A guy just won $1 million by creating an AI film.
67
A 19 -year -old girl runs an AI agency and earns $100 ,000 per month.
68
And a recent report from Forbes shows
69
that employees who use AI at work are earning 40 % more than those who don't.
70
So the question is, where are you?
71
Outskill is the first -ever AI -focused educational platform to accelerate AI learning for people like you and me.
72
They are hosting the two -day AI Mastermind Training Live this Saturday and Sunday,
73
and right now is the perfect moment to join because you can get in absolutely free for the next 48 hours.
74
Outskill's training has already built more than 10 million AI -first professionals worldwide
75
and is rated 4 .9 out of 5 on Trustpilot.
76
When you sign up to outskill, you'll also get access to the 2026 AI Survival Hackbook,
77
a comprehensive compilation of the upcoming AI shifts in 2026 and the practical steps you can take to be prepared.
78
Seats are limited.
79
Use the link in the description to join.
80
Thanks for watching.
81
See you tomorrow.
📺 同じチャンネル
✨ おすすめ動画
このレッスンの語彙とスピーキングのポイント
この動画には、シャドーイング用の文が81文、単語が1038語あります。 音声の長さは6:24です。 話す速さは1分あたり約162語で、日常会話に近い自然なペースです。 英語の頻出3,000語に含まれる単語は79%だけなので、語彙は難しめです。
この動画の重要語彙
動画に出てくる覚えておきたい単語15語を、発音と意味つきで紹介します。
| 単語 | 発音 | 意味 |
|---|---|---|
| minus | /ˈmaɪ.nəs/ | 引く |
| mathematics 名詞 | /mæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪks/ | 数学 |
| complicated 形容詞 | /ˈkɑm.plɪˌkeɪ.tɪd/ | 複雑な |
| earn 動詞 | /ɝn/ | 稼ぐ, 得る |
| practical 形容詞 | /ˈpɹæk.tɪ.kəl/ | 実践的な |
| gate 名詞 | /ˈɡeɪ̯t/ | 門, 大門 |
| formula 名詞 | /ˈfɔː.mjʊ.lə/ | 公式, 定式 |
| ordinary 形容詞 | /ˈɔɹdɪnɛɹi/ | 通常な, 普通な |
| nest 名詞 | /nɛst/ | 巣, ネスト |
| equation 名詞 | /ɪˈkweɪ.ʒən/ | 方程式 |
| calculator 名詞 | /kæl.kjə.leɪ.tɚ/ | 電卓, 計算機 |
| argue 動詞 | /ˈɑɹ.ɡju/ | 議論する, 論ずる |
| explanation 名詞 | /ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən/ | 説明 |
| physics 名詞 | /ˈfɪz.ɪks/ | 物理学 |
| angle 名詞 | /ˈæŋ.ɡəl/ | 角度 |
動画に出てくる句動詞
| 単語 | 意味 |
|---|---|
| take over 動詞 | 引き受ける |
この動画の文法
話し手がよく使っている文型を、動画の実際の表現とともに紹介します。
| 文型 | 動画での表現 |
|---|---|
| 受動態 be + 過去分詞 — 誰がするかより、何が起きるかに焦点を当てる | is rated · be prepared · are limited |
| 関係詞節 who / which + 節 — 人や物について情報を加える | NAND, which is · regression, which means · those who don |
| 現在完了形 have/has + 過去分詞 — 過去の出来事が今も関係している | has done · has already built |
注意したい発音
話し手はdon't, it'd, doesn'tなど、短縮形や弱形を14回使っています。聞こえたとおりの短い形で発音しましょう。
- 「th」の音: mathematics /mæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪks/, mathematical /ˌmæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪ.kəl/, logarithm /ˈlɑ.ɡə.ɹɪ.ð(ə)m/, mathematician /ˌmæθ.(ə.)məˈtɪʃ.ən/
- 「sh」と「zh」の音: equation /ɪˈkweɪ.ʒən/, explanation /ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən/, structural /ˈstɹʌk(t͡)ʃəɹəl/, ambitious /æmˈbɪʃ.əs/, compilation /ˌkɑm.pɪˈleɪ.ʃən/
- 長い単語(アクセントの位置に注意): mathematics /mæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪks/, complicated /ˈkɑm.plɪˌkeɪ.tɪd/, ordinary /ˈɔɹdɪnɛɹi/, simplicity /sɪmˈplɪsɪti/, calculator /kæl.kjə.leɪ.tɚ/
この動画での練習方法
- まず声を出さずに動画を最後まで聞き、知らない単語をメモします。
- まず0.75倍速で一文ずつシャドーイングし、慣れてきたら通常の速度に戻します。
- 自分の声を録音して元の音声と比べます。minus, mathematics, complicatedなどの単語に特に注意しましょう。
シャドーイングとは?英語上達に効果的な理由
シャドーイング(Shadowing)は、もともとプロの通訳者養成プログラムで開発された言語学習法で、多言語習得者として知られるDr. Alexander Arguelles によって広く普及されました。方法はシンプルですが非常に効果的:ネイティブスピーカーの英語を聞きながら、1〜2秒の遅延で声に出してすぐに繰り返す——まるで「影(shadow)」のように話者を追いかけます。文法ドリルや受動的なリスニングと異なり、シャドーイングは脳と口の筋肉が同時にリアルタイムで英語を処理・再現することを強制します。研究により、発音精度、抑揚、リズム、連音、リスニング力、そして会話の流暢さが大幅に向上することが確認されています。IELTSスピーキング対策や自然な英語コミュニケーションを目指す方に特におすすめです。





















