Shadowing Practice: Mathematician Collapses All Functions to One Weird Formula - Learn English Speaking with Video

Les maken...
1
plus, minus, x times y, x to the power of y, sine and cosine.
2
Maths is full with complicated operations that you do to numbers.
3
An ambitious new paper now claims that actually you can do everything with only one operation.
4
That's quite a claim.
5
Maybe that finally explains why the Americans have only one math, where the Brits have maths.
6
I've had a look.
7
The new paper's a preprint that appeared on the archive the other week and comes from a mathematician in Poland.
8
The one operation
9
that he says can give everything is taking the exponential function of a number x minus the logarithm of another number y.
10
He calls that ML, short for exponential minus logarithm.
11
For example, if you put x and 1 into the ML function, you get e to the x minus log of 1.
12
Log of 1 is 0, so this gives you just the exponential function.
13
You can also get the logarithm itself back out.
14
For this, you first take ml of 1 and x, that gives you e minus log x.
15
Then you put that back into the first slot with another one.
16
So ml of ml 1 x 1, that gives e to the e over x.
17
And then you put that yet again into the second slot of ml with a 1 in the first.
18
If you work through the algebra, all the extra pieces cancel and you're left with just log of x.
19
So the same function gives you exponentials and logarithms indirectly.
20
But how do we get the standard operations, addition, subtraction, multiplication, etc.? They're all in there.
21
Take subtraction.
22
We just saw that you can express the exponential function and the logarithm through ML operations.
23
If you put those back into the ML function, what do you get?
24
You get x minus y.
25
You can also get a plus just by entering minus y.
26
And now you see you can put the sum of two logarithms into the exponent of the exponential function.
27
That'll give you multiplication.
28
And once you have multiplication, you can define powers and so on.
29
If you want to get trigonometric functions, you first need imaginary numbers.
30
You can get those from the logarithm at negative numbers, though there's a branch cut involved there.
31
I know that sounds like a gardening accident, but it just defines the logarithm for a negative number.
32
But once you have that, you get complex numbers, and you get sine and cosine and even the number pi.
33
What you do not get, for all I can see, is all real numbers starting from just 1 and 0, not without taking infinite limits.
34
But the author doesn't make that claim.
35
He says one can get all mathematical operations.
36
The paper hasn't yet been peer -reviewed, but I'm reasonably sure it's correct.
37
I saw a lot of people online worry about the arbitrary branch cut of the logarithm, but I don't think this matters.
38
Yes, you could choose it differently, and that it'd give you a different definition of complex numbers, but it'd still work.
39
Now, you may be wondering whether this is actually useful.
40
The answer is, for normal people, probably not.
41
No one's going to replace a normal calculator with one
42
that has a single deranged button that expects you to rebuild cosine by nesting 15 different operations.
43
The interesting part is structural.
44
In computer logic, there's a logical operation called NAND, which is enough on its own to build all the usual logical gates in a computer.
45
This paper's trying to find the analog for ordinary continuous maths.
46
The claim is that EML is kind of a NAND gate for scientific calculators.
47
And there is a possible practical angle.
48
If every ordinary formula can be rewritten as a tree made from one repeated building block,
49
then that gives you a very uniform way to search for formulas with a computer.
50
The author suggests this could be useful for symbolic regression, which means trying to guess the equation behind a set of data.
51
So this may be less about helping humans do maths
52
and more about giving machines a simpler language in which to search for equations,
53
which is nice because if the machines are going to take over science, then at least they will do it in an orderly manner.
54
I give this paper a 0 out of 10 on the bullshit meter.
55
It's a cute paper.
56
I think that the point isn't super surprising to anyone, but it is surprising that no one has done it before.
57
There are two ways one can look at this result.
58
One is that mathematics appears more complicated than it is.
59
The other way to look at it is that what we think of as complicated is very subjective.
60
You could rightfully argue that maybe using 10 or
61
so different operations is easier than nesting just one operation 20 times in itself.
62
In the end, it depends on just how you quantify simplicity.
63
This is also an issue that haunts the foundations of physics, because what really do we mean when we say
64
that simple explanations are better if we don't agree on how to measure simplicity?
65
Or maybe it just tells us that mathematicians have too much time.
66
A guy just won $1 million by creating an AI film.
67
A 19 -year -old girl runs an AI agency and earns $100 ,000 per month.
68
And a recent report from Forbes shows
69
that employees who use AI at work are earning 40 % more than those who don't.
70
So the question is, where are you?
71
Outskill is the first -ever AI -focused educational platform to accelerate AI learning for people like you and me.
72
They are hosting the two -day AI Mastermind Training Live this Saturday and Sunday,
73
and right now is the perfect moment to join because you can get in absolutely free for the next 48 hours.
74
Outskill's training has already built more than 10 million AI -first professionals worldwide
75
and is rated 4 .9 out of 5 on Trustpilot.
76
When you sign up to outskill, you'll also get access to the 2026 AI Survival Hackbook,
77
a comprehensive compilation of the upcoming AI shifts in 2026 and the practical steps you can take to be prepared.
78
Seats are limited.
79
Use the link in the description to join.
80
Thanks for watching.
81
See you tomorrow.

Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les

Deze video bevat 81 zinnen en 1038 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 6:24. De spreker praat in een natuurlijk tempo van ongeveer 162 woorden per minuut, dicht bij een alledaags gesprek. Slechts 79% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden, dus de woordenschat is pittig.

Belangrijke woorden in deze video

15 woorden uit de video die het leren waard zijn, met uitspraak en betekenis:

WoordUitspraakBetekenis
minus/ˈmaɪ.nəs/min
mathematics zelfstandig naamwoord/mæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪks/wiskunde, mathematiek
complicated bijvoeglijk naamwoord/ˈkɑm.plɪˌkeɪ.tɪd/ingewikkeld, gecompliceerd
earn werkwoord/ɝn/verdienen
practical bijvoeglijk naamwoord/ˈpɹæk.tɪ.kəl/praktisch
gate zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈɡeɪ̯t/poort
formula zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈfɔː.mjʊ.lə/formule
ordinary bijvoeglijk naamwoord/ˈɔɹdɪnɛɹi/gewoon, alledaags
define werkwoord/dɪˈfaɪn/bepalen, determineren
logical bijvoeglijk naamwoord/ˈlɑd͡ʒɪkəl/logisch
nest zelfstandig naamwoord/nɛst/nest
equation zelfstandig naamwoord/ɪˈkweɪ.ʒən/vergelijking
calculator zelfstandig naamwoord/kæl.kjə.leɪ.tɚ/rekenmachine, zakrekenmachine
argue werkwoord/ˈɑɹ.ɡju/redetwisten
explanation zelfstandig naamwoord/ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən/verklaring, toelichting

Phrasal verbs die je zult horen

WoordBetekenis
back out werkwoordzich terugtrekken
take over werkwoordovernemen

Grammatica in deze video

De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:

StructuurIn de video
Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doetis rated · be prepared · are limited
Betrekkelijke bijzinnen who / which + zin — extra informatie over een persoon of dingNAND, which is · regression, which means · those who don
Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telthas done · has already built

Uitspraak om op te letten

De spreker gebruikt 14 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals don't, it'd, doesn't. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.

  • De “th”-klanken: mathematics /mæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪks/, mathematical /ˌmæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪ.kəl/, logarithm /ˈlɑ.ɡə.ɹɪ.ð(ə)m/, mathematician /ˌmæθ.(ə.)məˈtɪʃ.ən/
  • De klanken “sh” en “zh”: equation /ɪˈkweɪ.ʒən/, explanation /ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən/, structural /ˈstɹʌk(t͡)ʃəɹəl/, ambitious /æmˈbɪʃ.əs/, compilation /ˌkɑm.pɪˈleɪ.ʃən/
  • Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: mathematics /mæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪks/, complicated /ˈkɑm.plɪˌkeɪ.tɪd/, ordinary /ˈɔɹdɪnɛɹi/, simplicity /sɪmˈplɪsɪti/, calculator /kæl.kjə.leɪ.tɚ/

Zo oefen je met deze video

  1. Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
  2. Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
  3. Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als minus, mathematics, complicated.

Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?

Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.

Shadowing-techniek: lees de volledige stap-voor-stap-gids →