Luyện nói tiếng Anh bằng Shadowing qua video: Why You Should Be a Techno-Skeptic | Jonathan Haidt | TED
C1
.
294 câu
Nếu các câu quá ngắn hoặc quá dài, hãy bấm Edit để chỉnh sửa.
1
.
2
So to begin, I invite you all to remember a time in your life,
3
a period in your life when you felt fully integrated into a group.
4
Maybe you were on a sports team,
5
maybe you played in a band,
6
or maybe you just had a great group of friends that loved to hang out together.
7
Or maybe it was at work,
8
maybe you were part of a team trying to do something big and difficult under time pressure,
9
but you all pulled together.
10
Whatever it was, My question to you is, does that memory glow?
11
Do you look back on that as something special and magical that time in your life?
12
The great biologist E.O.
13
Wilson says that humans aren't just social, like dogs and chimpanzees.
14
We are ultra-social, like bees and ants.
15
We have a massive division of labor,
16
and we love to do things that put us in a mindset of one for all,
17
all for one.
18
Yet our hives aren't made out of wax.
19
They're made out of shared culture and shared experiences.
20
My talk today isn't really about bees and ants.
21
It's actually about technology and childhood.
22
But let's see what we can see about technology and childhood if we start with this premise
23
that human beings are ultra-social creatures with deep needs for community and communion.
24
As a social psychologist who studies the effects of digital tech on young people,
25
what I see from this perspective is very concerning.
26
I think it justifies a general sense of wariness or skepticism about the technologies that are pushing their way into childhood today.
27
So let's start with social media.
28
In the early 2010s, teens traded in their flip phones for smartphones,
29
and the phone-based childhood began.
30
Their social lives moved on to social media.
31
At first we thought this would be fine, maybe even better.
32
But quantity pushes out quality,
33
and they started spending a lot less time with each other in person.
34
And that's a problem for our ultra-social species,
35
because a lot of our evolved bonding mechanisms involve our bodies.
36
So we connect with people,
37
we bond with people when we eat with them,
38
when we share food with them,
39
when we share laughter, when we move together in synchrony,
40
even if it's just walking next to each other and we bond together when we touch.
41
But when everything moved online,
42
teens across the developed world lost most of those bonding experiences.
43
Levels of loneliness and anxiety began to rise almost immediately,
44
in many countries simultaneously.
45
And this wasn't just an historical correlation.
46
There are now multiple lines of evidence showing that social media is causing harm at an industrial scale.
47
One line is the dozens of experiments showing that when you randomly assign people,
48
these are usually with adults,
49
young adults, when you randomly assign people to greatly reduce their social media use for at least a week,
50
their levels of anxiety and depression go down.
51
And one of those studies was done by Metta.
52
But what I've learned in the last two years is that I grossly understated the damage in the anxious generation,
53
because I focused on the mental health outcomes.
54
That's where we have the best data,
55
that's where we're doing the most work.
56
But I now believe that an even larger damage is the diminishment of the human capacity to pay sustained attention.
57
One-third of all American teens say that they're on a social media platform almost constantly,
58
just throughout the day.
59
And the main thing they're doing on those social media platforms is watching very short videos.
60
Young people call it brain rot,
61
which is a funny term,
62
but it might really be true,
63
because the adolescent brain is always a brain that's being remodeled.
64
The neural network of a child has to convert itself,
65
has to rewire itself to become the neural network of an adult.
66
And that rewiring process, the neurons finding each other,
67
that's shaped by whatever you're doing every day.
68
And it's shaped by whatever everyone else says is prestigious,
69
which means that puberty is the worst possible time for a human being to be on social media.
70
For our ultra-social species, that rewiring should be guided by huge amounts of social interaction in the real world,
71
not by TikTok's algorithm.
72
I imagine there's a lot of parents in the audience.
73
So here's the first principle of what we might call techno-skepticism.
74
Protect brain development through puberty.
75
That's why it's so important for countries to follow Australia's example.
76
Let's just raise the age for opening social media accounts to 16, as Australia did.
77
All right, now let's look at edtech.
78
Of course there are good uses of technology in education.
79
My kids have learned a lot from Khan Academy.
80
But I'm very concerned about what happened when we started putting computers and tablets on kids' desks.
81
This is the so-called one-to-one device policies.
82
Computers and tablets are multifunction entertainment systems.
83
If kids can get to the internet,
84
they will play video games and watch short videos,
85
watch YouTube shorts and even porn.
86
As soon as we brought in one-to-one devices in the 2010s,
87
national test scores began dropping in the USA,
88
and they dropped in many other countries,
89
especially in the countries that most firmly embraced edtech.
90
Now, I can't prove that these declines were caused by the screens and the apps that we put on kids' desks.
91
But consider this.
92
Sweden led the world in digitizing education in the 2010s.
93
They got rid of textbooks,
94
they put a device on every desk.
95
They even mandated that nursery schools had to use tablets.
96
But after years of experience and years of declining test scores, Sweden reversed course.
97
In 2023, they announced that they're going back to textbooks,
98
they're pulling out a lot of the devices,
99
they're going back to books and handwriting,
100
especially in the earlier grades.
101
Their top research institute, the Karolinska Institute,
102
issued a report backing the government's position,
103
saying there is clear scientific evidence that digital tools impair rather than enhance student learning.
104
And consider this, many of us professors are banishing computers,
105
laptops from our classrooms.
106
My students at NYU say they learn a lot better when people aren't on devices.
107
They don't have a computer and the multitasking staring them in the face.
108
But if college students can't learn that well when there's a computer in front of them,
109
how do we expect eight-year-olds to do it?
110
School is an intrinsically social experience.
111
Students are not learning machines.
112
They're ultra-social human beings who need to connect with their teachers and their fellow students.
113
They don't need to connect with more screens.
114
So here's the second principle of technoskepticism.
115
Prioritize people and books and education, not screens.
116
We should never have let laptops and tablets spread through K-12 education without extensive testing and evidence of safety and efficacy.
117
But we're about to do the exact same mistake with AI.
118
You see the pattern here?
119
We let social media companies take over our kids' social lives,
120
and they've harmed our kids' social lives and their mental health.
121
We let edtech companies take over our kids' schools,
122
and they appear to be doing more harm than good.
123
Now, AI companies are coming for their relationships,
124
to be their friends, their therapists,
125
and even their sexual partners.
126
What could go wrong?
127
We're already seeing massive cognitive offloading and learning loss.
128
When students have access to AI,
129
they pass the critical thinking over to the AI.
130
We're already seeing young people becoming dependent on ChatGPT to make their personal decisions and to draft their texts and their emails.
131
And we're seeing a booming AI toy market.
132
Chatbots are being put into dolls and teddy bears.
133
And these chatbots are super responsive to the child.
134
They're always there to offer comfort,
135
to be there for the child.
136
And of course, the parents are often busy.
137
But if the chatbot is super responsive while the parents aren't as responsive,
138
the child's attachment system, which is looking for who in my environment is the person who responds to me,
139
may well imprint or focus on the chatbot,
140
which is going to compromise their relationship with their own parents.
141
So here's the third principle of techno-skepticism.
142
Just beware of artificial relationships for minors.
143
Give them nothing that conveys that it understands the child or that it cares, because it doesn't.
144
There could be a role for AI therapists someday,
145
but how about we require years of testing before we let anyone push it out into childhood?
146
All right.
147
Now, I've just told you that we need to greatly reduce the role of these technologies in our kids' lives.
148
And some of you may be thinking,
149
now, hold on a second,
150
I want my child to be successful in the digital future,
151
in the digital workplace.
152
So why not give them a head start?
153
Two reasons.
154
The first is that these technologies are extremely easy to use.
155
Your kid doesn't need a 10-year head start to master social media and AI.
156
And second, because now we know that being a digital native does not confer an advantage.
157
For many kids, it's a curse,
158
because it messes with the kids' attention systems and their motivational systems.
159
It teaches them that there's always a little bit of reward,
160
always a little bit of dopamine available,
161
one swipe away, and that undermines the ability to do difficult or sustained cognitive work,
162
like reading a book.
163
I teach a course at NYU called Flourishing,
164
and two years ago we were talking about attention fragmentation,
165
and one of my students,
166
who's a very heavy TikTok user,
167
she said, yeah, I take out a book,
168
I read a sentence, I get bored, I go to TikTok.
169
So if we want our children to be successful in the digital future,
170
we need to protect them from the damage being done in the digital present.
171
So let's return to the hive.
172
What do we see when we look at technology in childhood through this lens?
173
When we start from the premise that humans are ultra-social,
174
What we see is that these technologies are being built by people who don't understand that premise.
175
They think of people as consumers with social needs that can be satisfied by machines.
176
They think it's good to free people from dependence on other people.
177
Let's suppose, just for the sake of argument,
178
let's suppose that they really can give us excellent friends and excellent romantic partners.
179
In fact, just yesterday at lunch,
180
Esther Perel told me she recently did her first couples therapy with a mixed couple,
181
a human male and an AI female. So is this liberation?
182
Do we no longer have to depend on other people to meet our social needs?
183
Would that make us happy if we don't have to depend on others?
184
Absolutely not, because that would mean that nobody depends on us.
185
Nobody is relying on us.
186
We are not important to anyone.
187
So is this our fate?
188
Is there any way to stop this lonely digital future?
189
Yes, there is.
190
When The Anxious Generation came out two years ago,
191
one of the main objections I got was that I was too late.
192
The technology is here to stay, people said.
193
You can't put the genie back in the bottle.
194
But in the last few years,
195
humanity has mobilized, and we are putting the genie back in the bottle.
196
Mothers were the first to organize and take action,
197
but they were quickly joined by fathers and by a lot of Gen Z activist organizations,
198
and also by many governors and many heads of state.
199
Together, we're getting phones out of schools around the world.
200
Thank you.
201
Teachers are so thrilled to get their students back,
202
and one of the things that they tell us,
203
it's the most common thing we hear,
204
we hear laughter in the hallways again.
205
We're getting the age raised for social media to 16.
206
More than a dozen countries have already committed to following Australia's bold example.
207
And we're seeing parents letting go and trusting their children to ride bicycles with their friends
208
and to do errands so that they can feel useful.
209
I'll give you one example.
210
A mom in Utah gave her seven-year-old son the let grow challenge.
211
That's where you say to the kid,
212
what's something that you think you can do on your own?
213
And her son said, I think I can go into a Chick-fil-A restaurant and get us lunch." So she says, OK.
214
And in the video, you see the mother sitting in the car.
215
You see the kid coming out of the store,
216
and he's got the bags and he's got this huge smile,
217
and he comes into the car and he says, that was so fun.
218
And then the mom says, were you nervous?
219
And he says, yeah, my legs are still shivering,
220
but I want to do it again.
221
So these are the stories, these kinds of stories.
222
This is what most moves me and what most thrills me,
223
because this movement is not primarily about technology.
224
It's about reclaiming childhood in the real world with real people.
225
So what on earth do we do about the robot teachers
226
and all of the other future waves of technology that are going to push their way into childhood without adequate safety testing?
227
It sometimes seems completely overwhelming.
228
So let me repeat the three principles of techno-skepticism.
229
One, protect brain development through puberty.
230
Two, prioritize people and books in education, not screens.
231
Three, beware of artificial relationships for minors.
232
I think techno-skepticism is the right attitude for people today,
233
especially for parents and legislators,
234
because when it comes to children,
235
these companies have earned our distrust.
236
Technoskepticism means that from now on,
237
we put the burden of proof on them.
238
Let them prove that their products are safe.
239
We treat them like any other maker of potentially dangerous consumer products.
240
We make them prove that their products are safe before they push them out into the world.
241
And we hold them responsible ...
242
We hold them responsible for their safety lapses.
243
So in conclusion, human beings are ultra-social creatures who need to matter to one another in order to flourish.
244
We are so brilliant that we've invented technologies that can replace us,
245
that can take us out of each other's lives.
246
But human connection is not optional.
247
It's who we are.
248
So we're going to have to fight for a future in which our children can grow into flourishing, connected adults.
249
Thank you.
250
Do you disagree with anything I said?
251
We agree in spirit 100 percent.
252
And that's where my question is, actually.
253
We have talked about this in the past, even before TED.
254
But how extreme would you go?
255
What would you say to someone that would make the argument,
256
even put Khan Academy aside,
257
if a student is writing their paper,
258
if they're editing video, if they're doing something creative,
259
and they're building some skills in the process,
260
isn't there some middle ground that might be okay?
261
Well, it depends on the age.
262
So if we're talking elementary school,
263
I would say no. I would say it's so clear,
264
kids need to learn basic skills,
265
They need to develop a habit of books.
266
There's all this research on how print is better.
267
For elementary school, let's just get rid of all the one-to-one devices,
268
go back to books and paper.
269
The people who made this technology,
270
they choose, a lot of them choose to send their kids to schools that don't have it.
271
So when we're talking about young kids,
272
I say just no. Like,
273
until it's proven safe, no. But I think we learned something really interesting today.
274
So that, I forget her name,
275
that amazing woman in Africa, who's giving tablets.
276
Imagine worldwide, yes.
277
So note, no internet.
278
That's the key.
279
And I said to you,
280
like, years ago, I said,
281
Sal, if someone would make a device that just had Khan Academy,
282
you could not go to YouTube,
283
you could not do anything, that would be amazing.
284
We agree.
285
So anyone raising money for this, anyone want to?
286
Someone has to make this.
287
Do you agree with that?
288
I was fishing for that all night, so yes, thank you.
289
Thank you.
290
No, well, thank you so much, Jonathan.
291
A super important conversation.
292
Thank you.
293
Thank you, Sal.
294
Thank you.
Tải Ứng Dụng
Có tính năng chấm điểm câu của bạn bằng AI
TRENDING
Phổ biến
4.9/5 trên App Store & Google Play
Shadowing English
Trên Mobile
Học tiếng Anh mọi lúc, mọi nơi với ứng dụng Shadowing English. Nâng cao kỹ năng giao tiếp của bạn ngay hôm nay!
Theo dõi quá trình học tập
Chấm điểm và sửa lỗi bằng AI
Kho dữ liệu video phong phú
Tại sao nên luyện nói với video này?
Việc luyện nói tiếng Anh thông qua video "Tại sao bạn nên trở thành người hoài nghi về công nghệ" của Jonathan Haidt mang đến cho người học một cơ hội tuyệt vời để cải thiện khả năng giao tiếp. Video này không chỉ giúp người xem thấu hiểu các khía cạnh xã hội và tâm lý trong việc sử dụng công nghệ mà còn khuyến khích họ tham gia vào những cuộc thảo luận sâu sắc về tác động của công nghệ lên cuộc sống và mối quan hệ giữa con người. Luyện nói với bối cảnh này giúp bạn không chỉ nâng cao kỹ năng nói mà còn mở rộng vốn từ và kiến thức về chủ đề công nghệ, xã hội, và tâm lý.
Cấu trúc ngữ pháp & Biểu đạt trong ngữ cảnh
- “Do you look back on that as something special and magical?” - Câu hỏi này sử dụng cấu trúc câu hỏi gián tiếp, cho phép người học nắm rõ cách đặt câu hỏi mở rộng trong giao tiếp hàng ngày.
- “I think it justifies a general sense of wariness or skepticism...” - Câu sử dụng cấu trúc “I think” để diễn đạt ý kiến cá nhân, rất thông dụng trong các cuộc thảo luận.
- “...we bond together when we touch.” - Câu sử dụng động từ “bond” và cách diễn đạt cụ thể giúp người học hiểu cách sử dụng động từ trong các bối cảnh xã hội.
Những cấu trúc này là cơ hội tuyệt vời để người học luyện nói tiếng anh, áp dụng vào thực tế giao tiếp, đặc biệt trong các buổi thảo luận nhóm hoặc khi tham gia vào các buổi hội thảo.
Các cạm bẫy phát âm phổ biến
Khi theo dõi video, có một số từ và cụm từ có thể gây khó khăn cho người học trong việc phát âm chính xác:
- “skeptic” - Phát âm là /ˈskɛptɪk/, người học có thể gặp khó khăn khi phát âm âm "k" và âm "t" trong từ này.
- “loneliness” - Phát âm là /ˈloʊnliness/, cần lưu ý nhấn âm ở âm tiết đầu.
- “technology” - Phát âm là /tɛkˈnɑːlədʒi/, cần chú ý cách nối âm giữa các âm tiết.
Để khắc phục những cạm bẫy này, người học có thể áp dụng phương pháp luyện nói shadowspeaks hoặc shadow speech nhằm nâng cao khả năng phát âm của mình trong khi luyện tập với video. Đây là những kỹ thuật giúp người học không chỉ lắng nghe mà còn học theo cách nói của diễn giả một cách tự nhiên.
Phương Pháp Shadowing Là Gì?
Shadowing là kỹ thuật học ngôn ngữ có cơ sở khoa học, ban đầu được phát triển cho chương trình đào tạo phiên dịch viên chuyên nghiệp và được phổ biến rộng rãi bởi nhà đa ngôn ngữ học Dr. Alexander Arguelles. Nguyên lý cốt lõi đơn giản nhưng cực kỳ hiệu quả: bạn nghe tiếng Anh của người bản xứ và lặp lại to ngay lập tức — như một "cái bóng" (shadow) đuổi theo người nói với độ trễ chỉ 1–2 giây. Khác với luyện ngữ pháp hay học từ vựng bị động, Shadowing buộc não bộ và cơ miệng phải đồng thời xử lý và tái tạo ngôn ngữ thực tế. Các nghiên cứu khoa học xác nhận phương pháp này cải thiện đáng kể phát âm, ngữ điệu, nhịp điệu, nối âm, kỹ năng nghe và độ lưu loát khi nói — đặc biệt hiệu quả cho người luyện IELTS Speaking và muốn giao tiếp tiếng Anh tự nhiên như người bản ngữ.