शैडोइंग अभ्यास: The Only AI Tools You Need (12-Minute Guide) - वीडियो के साथ अंग्रेजी बोलना सीखें

अभ्यास मोड चुनें

हर मोड पूरी स्क्रीन का अभ्यास कक्ष खोलता है।

155 वाक्य

यदि वाक्य बहुत छोटे या लंबे हों, तो समायोजित करने के लिए Edit पर क्लिक करें।

I use around 10 AI tools for 90 % of my work, and each one excels in one specific area.

But figuring out which tool works best for what task usually takes months of trial and error.

So I'll share the one thing each tool does better than alternatives, so you walk away with a clear mental model for when to use what.

I've grouped these tools into four categories across a two -part series.

There's just too much to cover.

This video covers everyday and specialist AI, while part two covers the remaining two categories.

Let's get started.

Kicking things off with everyday AI.

These are your general purpose chatbots, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude.

And while they seem interchangeable, their quote -unquote motes, the specific things they do best, have actually become quite distinct.

Starting with the OG, ChatGPT.

While Gemini and Claude are arguably just as capable in raw power, ChatGPT still holds the crown in one area.

It's the most obedient model.

In plain English, ChatGPT drops fewer balls when you hand it a complex checklist.

Other models might be just as smart, but give them a lengthy set of instructions and they'll sometimes skip a step or decide they know better.

If you want proof of this, just ask each model to optimize a rough prompt for itself.

ChatGPT will generate a noticeably longer and more detailed prompt because it knows it can handle the complexity.

And if you run that optimized ChatGPT prompt through both ChatGPT and Gemini, for example, you'll notice two things.

First, ChatGPT thinks longer because it's actually checking every requirement, and it follows each instruction to the letter.

Gemini, on the other hand, often takes shortcuts.

Pro tip, I share the exact prompt optimizer in the Essential Power Prompts template linked below,

but you can test this yourself with something as simple as, optimize this prompt for ChatGPT, insert model number here.

Here's my rough prompt.

Diving into a real world example, I gave both ChatGPT and Gemini the same complex prompt, a hiring rubric with a dozen requirements.

ChatGPT delivered every single one.

Gemini's output looked right at first glance, but when I checked it against my original list, it had quietly dropped a few rules.

That's the key difference.

ChatGPT doesn't decide which instructions matter.

It just follows them.

Here's second, simpler example.

Sometimes when you explicitly tell Gemini to search the web, it just doesn't, which is wild since Gemini and Google search are both Google products, right?

Whereas with ChatGPT, when you enable web search, it performs the web search every single time.

I know this is a small example, but it's downstream from ChatGPT's core superpower.

Obedience means you can trust the behavior you asked for.

So as a rule of thumb, if a task has a lot of moving parts and getting one wrong breaks the whole thing, start with ChatGPT.

Next up, Gemini.

Where ChatGPT wins on obedience, Gemini wins on multi -modality.

In plain English, Gemini is able to process a massive amount of mixed media, video, audio, images, and text natively.

Taking a look at this table, we see that only Gemini can handle all four types of media natively.

It's able to quote -unquote listen to audio and quote -unquote watch videos, while ChatGPT and Claude use roundabout ways to access that information.

What's more, Gemini's massive 1 million token context window means it can handle large video recordings, hour -long audio recordings, full slide decks,

all together that would literally choke other models.

If you watched my latest Gemini video, you'll remember the use case where I screen recorded a messy walkthrough of myself completing a task,

uploading that video onto Gemini, and asking Gemini to turn it into a ready -to -use SOP with perfect formatting,

which is an example of Gemini ingesting video and turning it into text.

Now, let's take that a step further.

Imagine you just finished a weekly meeting.

You have a video recording of the call, a 20 -slide deck, and a photo of a messy whiteboard session.

You can upload all three and ask Gemini to summarize what was discussed, pull out the key decisions, and draft the follow -up email.

Gemini is the only tool that can synthesize all three in one go.

All that said, I have to point out that Gemini's raw reasoning capabilities sometimes feels slightly behind ChatGPT.

But when the task involves video, audio, or massive files, the trade -off is obviously worth it.

Speaking of matching the right tool to the task, today's sponsor HubSpot put together a free guide called the AI Productivity Stack that covers 50

Tools Organized by Use Case.

Here's why I like it.

While this video focuses on my personal favorites, your workflow probably needs something different.

Maybe you're in marketing and need SEO -specific tools, or you manage a team and want to build automated workflows with reliable AI.

This guide breaks down tools across business functions like research, design, and marketing, and for each tool, it shows you the best use case,

key features, pricing, and a step -by -step workflow.

What I found most useful is the decision logic at the end of each section.

So for example, The research category tells you exactly when to use perplexity versus Claude versus Humana based on what you're actually trying to do.

It's a great way to quickly understand what each tool does well.

I'll leave a link to this free guide down below.

Thank you, HubSpot, for sponsoring this video.

Rounding out the Everyday AI category, Claude.

Claude's superpower is producing higher quality first drafts than the other models.

In plain English, that means Claude's first attempt is usually closer to done.

This superpower shows up in two areas.

First, coding.

Here's a fun fact.

The latest version of Gemini beat the older version of Claude in every single benchmark score except for the coding one, which is crazy.

So obviously, Anthropic has figured out something related to coding the others haven't.

And in practice, developers universally agree that Claude writes functional code on the first try more consistently than alternatives.

Here's a real world example.

I needed to bulk export conversations from a customer service platform, but their support team said only developers could do it.

I described the problem and Claude not only gave me step -by -step instructions,

but also wrote a script in Go that worked on the first try.

I don't even know what

Go is, nor can I write code.

Another example, I asked all three models to turn a static image into an interactive chart, and Claude performed the best on the first try.

So basically anything that requires generating working code tends to favor Claude.

Pro tip, when it comes to diagrams, you can ask Claude to generate mermaid code,

which you can then paste directly into tools like Excalidraw to get clean visuals in minutes.

Area two, polishing copy.

Beyond code, Claude produces written drafts that sound human and need fewer revisions.

When you need to tighten an argument or match a specific voice, Claude just gets it.

Put simply, it's exceptionally good at style matching.

Once you share examples of your existing work, it replicates your tone almost perfectly.

When I was in corporate, I'd share previous documents so Claude could replicate that voice across presentations and performance reviews.

And now as a creator, I feed it my existing YouTube scripts to help refine new drafts.

At this point, you might be wondering how I use all three everyday AI tools together.

In a nutshell, ChatGPT or Gemini usually handles the beginning of my work.

Ideation, research, drafting the outline of a presentation.

Clawed that handles the last mile, turning that rough output into something I'm ready to present or publish.

Quick note on Grok, a lot of people ask why I don't use it.

It's actually very simple.

Grok's superpower is its direct access to the Twitter slash X firehose, right?

So it's the best option for people who need to analyze breaking news events in real time.

I never needed that.

100

And as a rule of thumb, we should never use tools just for the sake of using tools.

101

We should only add them to our toolkit when they solve an actual problem we have.

102

Here's a quick recap of the three models and when to use them.

103

And if you're wondering whether you need all three,

104

the short answer is no. Most people should stick with the paid version of ChatGPT and get really good at it.

105

But if you can afford multiple subscriptions and your workflow can take advantage of their individual superpowers, mix and match as needed.

106

Fun fact, according to this study on open router data, models from different labs like like ChatGPT and Gemini,

107

expand the pie of AI use cases precisely because they excel at different things.

108

On to the second category, specialist AI.

109

Before diving in, let's clear up a very common misconception.

110

Tools like Perplexity are not foundational models.

111

Here's a simple visual.

112

OpenAI, a frontier AI lab, develops the GPT family of models.

113

They also created ChatGPT as the user -friendly app layer.

114

Perplexity is different.

115

It fine -tunes existing foundational models for speed and accuracy, and is optimized for search.

116

Their own sonar model, for example, is just a fine -tuned version of Meta's open -weight llama model.

117

So on that note, perplexity's superpower is finding accurate information fast.

118

In plain English, the general purpose chatpots are built for reasoning.

119

You use them to help you think, brainstorm, or write a draft.

120

Perplexity is built for fetching.

121

You need a specific fact, and you need it now.

122

Starting Starting off with a simple real -life example,

123

I used Chachibiti to plan a trip to Japan with my brother because that is a creative task.

124

It requires weighing trade -offs, building a narrative, and for that kind of task, I'm happy to wait while the model thinks.

125

But when I need grab -and -go information, like whether a specific restaurant is foreigner -friendly because we don't speak Japanese,

126

I'd want perplexity to give me accurate and update information within seconds.

127

Second example, going back to how I use the three everyday AI tools, let's say Gemini or ChatGPT helps me brainstorm and structure my newsletter.

128

Claude produces the final draft.

129

Perplexity, in this case, is the search scalpel

130

that verifies information like whether Gemini's context window is one million or two million tokens.

131

In case you're curious, consumers get one million, enterprises get two million.

132

Pro tip, you can use Google style search operators like site, colon reddit .com to narrow your results to a specific source.

133

I have an entire video on the most useful Google search operators, so I'll link that down below.

134

As a rule of thumb, think of perplexity as a replacement for Google AI mode.

135

They're both for fetching information and not as a replacement for general purpose chatbots.

136

Actually, let me know if you want an entire video breaking down the AI search apps like perplexity, Google search, Google AI overviews,

137

Google AI mode, because they're all made for different things.

138

Rounding out specialist AI, Notebook LM's superpower is that it only answers from the sources you give it, meaning it won't make things up.

139

Think of it like a walled garden.

140

You upload your sources and Notebook LM answers questions using only those documents.

141

It can't really hallucinate because it has no outside knowledge to draw from.

142

Going back to the visual around how perplexity is optimized for search, Notebook LM uses a fine -tuned Google Gemini model that minimizes hallucinations.

143

For instance, when I was at Google, before publishing marketing materials, I would upload the final draft alongside the source documents and ask

144

Notebook LM if the draft made any claims that contradicted the sources, and it would catch these tiny discrepancies other AI might have missed.

145

I use a similar workflow today for my videos.

146

Before I start filming, I upload my script

147

and all my research into Notebook LM and ask it to flag anything not directly supported by the source material.

148

The obvious caveat here is that the output is only as good as the sources we give it.

149

So if the sources are incorrect, Notebook LM is going to be confidently incorrect.

150

So as a rule of thumb, if the accuracy matters more than creativity and you have source materials to check against, use Notebook LM.

151

There are a few more specialist AI tools I use, but didn't make this list because I don't use them every day.

152

But to quickly go through them, Gamma for presentations, 11labs for voice cloning, Zapier and NAN for automation, and Excalitral and Napkin AI for quick visuals.

153

As a reminder, I'll cover the remaining two categories in part two, so keep an eye out for that.

154

See you on the next video.

155

In the meantime, have a great one.

ऐप डाउनलोड करें

धाराप्रवाह बोलने के लिए ज़रूरी सब कुछ

AI उच्चारण स्कोरहर वाक्य का स्कोर

IPA अभ्यासहर ध्वनि में महारत

शब्दावलीअपना शब्द भंडार बनाएँ

शब्द गेमखेलते हुए सीखें

QR स्कैन करें

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

उसी चैनल से

FOR YOU

अनुशंसित वीडियो

484 वाक्य

How to Build an AI Agent for Every Part of Your Life

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

407 वाक्य

Why AI Tokens are so Expensive - Computerphile

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

366 वाक्य

ChatGPT + Podcasts = English Fluency? Try These 12 Prompts!

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

74 वाक्य

LangChain in 5 Minutes (Explained Clearly)

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

90 वाक्य

Did Google just dethrone OpenAI and Anthropic?

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

55 वाक्य

When AIs act emotional

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

171 वाक्य

Why the Arab World never united

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

223 वाक्य

9 Insane Claude Mods I Already Can't live Without

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

358 वाक्य

It’s not just you

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

70 वाक्य

A Practical Guide To Becoming An AI Engineer (2026)

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

353 वाक्य

Opus 5.5 Just Changed Video Editing Forever (free skills)

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

510 वाक्य

Inside the secret race to build artificial intelligence | The Gray Area

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

इस पाठ की शब्दावली और बोलने के सुझाव

यह स्पीकिंग पाठ वीडियो “The Only AI Tools You Need” पर आधारित है। सबसे ज़्यादा दोहराए गए शब्द ये हैं: Chatgpt, Gemini, tool, model, Claude। इस वीडियो में शैडोइंग के लिए 155 वाक्य और 2173 शब्द हैं। बोला गया हिस्सा 11:54 लंबा है। वक्ता तेज़ बोलता है, लगभग 183 शब्द प्रति मिनट, इसलिए जुड़ी हुई और कमज़ोर ध्वनियाँ ज़्यादा मिलेंगी। केवल 76% शब्द अंग्रेज़ी के 3,000 सबसे आम शब्दों में से हैं, इसलिए शब्दावली कठिन है।

इस वीडियो की मुख्य शब्दावली

वीडियो के 15 सीखने लायक शब्द, उच्चारण और अर्थ के साथ:

शब्द	उच्चारण	अर्थ
everyday विशेषण	/ˈɛvɹiˌdeɪ/	दैनिक, रोज़ाना
upload क्रिया	/ˈʌpˌloʊd/	चढ़ाना, उपारोपण
plain संज्ञा	/pleɪn/	मैदान
specialist संज्ञा	/ˈspɛʃəlɪst/	विशेषज्ञ
instruction संज्ञा	/ɪnˈstɹʌkʃən/	उपदेश, शिक्षण
thumb संज्ञा	/ˈθʌm/	अंगूठा
script संज्ञा	/skɹɪpt/	लिपि, लेखन
tune संज्ञा	/tjuːn/	धुन
generate क्रिया	/ˈd͡ʒɛn.ə.ɹeɪt/	उपजाना
operator संज्ञा	/ˈɑpəˌɹeɪtɚ/	संचालक
developer संज्ञा	/dɪˈvɛləpɚ/	विकासक
dive क्रिया	/daɪv/	डुबकी
publish क्रिया	/ˈpʌblɪʃ/	प्रकाशित करना, प्रकाशन
incorrect विशेषण	/ˌɪn.kəˈɹɛkt/	त्रुटिपूर्ण
messy विशेषण	/ˈmɛsi/	अव्यवस्थित, अस्त-व्यस्त

इस वीडियो का व्याकरण

वक्ता जिन संरचनाओं का सबसे अधिक प्रयोग करता है, वीडियो के असली शब्दों के साथ:

संरचना	वीडियो में
Passive voice be + past participle — ज़ोर इस पर कि क्या होता है, न कि कौन करता है	was discussed · is optimized · are built
Present perfect have/has + past participle — बीता हुआ काम जिसका असर अभी भी है	I've grouped · have actually become · has figured
Relative clauses who / which + उपवाक्य — व्यक्ति या वस्तु के बारे में अतिरिक्त जानकारी	one, which is · people who need

ध्यान देने योग्य उच्चारण

वक्ता 28 बार संक्षिप्त रूपों का प्रयोग करता है, जैसे don't, I'll, you're। इन्हें वैसे ही छोटा बोलें जैसा आप सुनते हैं।

“th” की ध्वनियाँ: thumb /ˈθʌm/, synthesize /ˈsɪnθəsaɪz/, walkthrough /ˈwɔːk.θɹuː/
“sh” और “zh” की ध्वनियाँ: specialist /ˈspɛʃəlɪst/, instruction /ɪnˈstɹʌkʃən/, presentation /ˌpɹɛzn̩ˈteɪʃn̩/, publish /ˈpʌblɪʃ/, polish /ˈpɑ.lɪʃ/
लंबे शब्द — बलाघात सही रखें: operator /ˈɑpəˌɹeɪtɚ/, accuracy /ˈæk.jɚ.ə.si/, developer /dɪˈvɛləpɚ/, consistently /kənˈsɪstəntli/, capability /ˌkeɪ.pəˈbɪl.ɪ.ti/

हिंदी भाषियों के लिए मुश्किल ध्वनियाँ:

/v/ और /w/ का फ़र्क़ — /v/ में ऊपर के दाँत निचले होंठ को छूते हैं, /w/ में होंठ गोल होते हैं: everyday /ˈɛvɹiˌdeɪ/, versus /ˈvɝsəs/, developer /dɪˈvɛləpɚ/, dive /daɪv/, solve /sɒlv/
/z/ — इसे “ज” (/dʒ/) न बनाएँ: presentation /ˌpɹɛzn̩ˈteɪʃn̩/, whereas /(h)wɛɹˈæz/, enterprise /ˈɛntəˌpɹaɪz/, analyze /ˈæn.əˌlaɪz/, minimize /ˈmɪn.ɪˌmaɪz/
शब्द की शुरुआत में s + व्यंजन — पहले “इ” न जोड़ें: specialist /ˈspɛʃəlɪst/, script /skɹɪpt/, slide /ˈslaɪ̯d/, sponsor /ˈspɒn.səː/, skip /skɪp/

इस वीडियो से अभ्यास कैसे करें

पहले बिना बोले पूरा वीडियो एक बार सुनें और जो शब्द नहीं आते उन्हें लिख लें।
0.75× गति से शुरू करें, एक-एक वाक्य की शैडोइंग करें, और सहज लगने पर सामान्य गति पर लौटें।
अपनी आवाज़ रिकॉर्ड करें और मूल से तुलना करें, ख़ासकर everyday, upload, plain जैसे शब्दों पर ध्यान दें।

शैडोइंग तकनीक क्या है?

शैडोइंग (Shadowing) एक विज्ञान-समर्थित भाषा सीखने की तकनीक है जो मूल रूप से पेशेवर दुभाषिया प्रशिक्षण के लिए विकसित की गई थी। विधि सरल लेकिन शक्तिशाली है: आप मूल अंग्रेज़ी ऑडियो सुनते हैं और तुरंत इसे ज़ोर से दोहराते हैं — जैसे वक्ता की छाया 1-2 सेकंड की देरी से। शोध से पता चलता है कि यह उच्चारण सटीकता, स्वर, लय, जुड़ी हुई ध्वनियाँ, सुनने की समझ और बोलने की प्रवाहशीलता में काफ़ी सुधार करता है।

शैडोइंग तकनीक: पूरी चरण-दर-चरण गाइड पढ़ें →

शैडोइंग अभ्यास: The Only AI Tools You Need (12-Minute Guide) - वीडियो के साथ अंग्रेजी बोलना सीखें

अभ्यास मोड चुनें

ऐप डाउनलोड करें

Write a Killer Résumé in the AI Era: 5 New Rules!

How I'd Learn AI From Scratch in 2026 (skip the useless 80%)

Tell Me About Yourself (The BEST Way to Answer this Interview Question)

Why Are You a Good Fit for this Role - How to Answer

What is Your Biggest Weakness? (Ace this Interview Question!)

Claude Design is Insanely Easy (even for beginners)

Learn 95% of ChatGPT Work in Under 20 Minutes

Tell Me About Yourself - Structure a Strong Answer

7 Job Interview Questions to Prepare For!

How to Get Started with Notion (without losing your mind)

Google’s AI Course for Beginners (in 10 minutes)!

AI Agents, Clearly Explained

Tell me a time You Handled a Difficult Situation (Interview Question)

How to Build an AI Agent for Every Part of Your Life

Why AI Tokens are so Expensive - Computerphile

ChatGPT + Podcasts = English Fluency? Try These 12 Prompts!

LangChain in 5 Minutes (Explained Clearly)

Did Google just dethrone OpenAI and Anthropic?

When AIs act emotional

Why the Arab World never united

9 Insane Claude Mods I Already Can't live Without

It’s not just you

A Practical Guide To Becoming An AI Engineer (2026)

Opus 5.5 Just Changed Video Editing Forever (free skills)

Inside the secret race to build artificial intelligence | The Gray Area

इस पाठ की शब्दावली और बोलने के सुझाव

इस वीडियो की मुख्य शब्दावली

इस वीडियो का व्याकरण

ध्यान देने योग्य उच्चारण

इस वीडियो से अभ्यास कैसे करें

शैडोइंग तकनीक क्या है?