शैडोइंग अभ्यास: Zuckerberg and Senator Hawley clash in fiery child safety hearing - YouTube के साथ अंग्रेजी बोलना सीखें

⏸ रुका हुआ

Mr Zuckerberg, let me start with you.

गति:

136 वाक्य

यदि वाक्य बहुत छोटे या लंबे हों, तो समायोजित करने के लिए Edit पर क्लिक करें।

Mr Zuckerberg, let me start with you.

Did I hear you say in your opening statement that there's no link between mental health and social media use?

Senator, what I said is I think it's important to look at the science.

I know it's People widely talk about this as if that is something that's already been proven.

And I think that the bulk of the scientific evidence does not support that.

Well, really, let me just remind you of some of the science from your own company.

Instagram studied the effect of of your platform on teenagers.

Let me just read you some quotes from the Wall Street Journal's report on this company researchers found that Instagram is harmful.

for a sizable percentage of teenagers, most notably teenage girls.

Here's a quote from your own study quote.

We make body image issues worse for one in three.

teen girls.

Here's another quote teams blamed Instagram.

This is your study for increases in the rate of anxiety and depression.

This reaction was unprompted and consistent across all groups.

That's your study.

Senator, we try to understand the the feedback and how people feel about the services.

We can improve what a minute your own dad your own study says that you make

Life worse for one in three teenage girls.

You increase anxiety and depression.

That's what it says.

And you're here testifying to us in public that there's no link.

You've been doing this for years.

For years, you've been coming in public and testifying under oath that there's absolutely no link.

Your product is wonderful.

The science is nascent full speed ahead while internally, you know, full well, your product is a disaster. for teenagers.

And yet you keep right on doing what you're doing.

Right.

That's not true.

Let me let me let me show you some other facts I know that you're familiar with.

Wait a minute.

That's not a question.

Those are facts.

Mr. Zuckerberg.

That's not a question.

That's bizarre.

Let me show you some more facts.

Here are some here's some information from a whistleblower who came before the Senate testified under oath in public.

He worked for you to senior executive.

Here's what he showed he found when he studied your products.

So, for example, this is girls between the ages of 13 and 15 years old, 37 percent of them.

reported.

They had been exposed to nudity on the platform unwanted in the last seven days.

24 % said that the people who are not going to be but they had experienced unwanted sexual advances.

They've been propositioned in the last seven days 17 % said they had encountered self harm content pushed at them.

In the last seven days.

Now I know you're familiar with these stats because he sent you an email where he lined it all out.

I mean, we've got a copy of it.

right here.

My question is, who did you fire for this?

Who got fired because of that?

Senator, we study all this because it's important.

We want to improve our service.

Well, you just told me saying that you studied it be that there was no linkage.

Who did you fire?

I said you mischaracterized 37 % of teenage girls between 13

and 15 were exposed to unwanted nudity in a week on Instagram.

You knew about it.

Who did you fire?

Senator.

This is why we're building all who did you fire rules.

Senator, I don't think that that's-- Who did you fire?

I'm not going to answer that.

Because you didn't fire anybody, right?

You didn't take any significant action.

It's appropriate to talk about-- It's not appropriate.

Do you know who's sitting behind you?

You've got families from across the nation whose children are either severely harmed or gone,

and you don't think it's appropriate to talk about steps that you took?

The fact that you didn't fire a single person?

Let me ask you this.

Have you compensated any of the victims?

Sorry, have you compensated any of the victims?

These girls, have you compensated them?

I don't believe so.

Why not?

Don't you think they deserve some compensation for what your platform has done?

Help with counseling services, help with

dealing with the issues that your your services cause our our job is to make sure

that we build tools to help keep people safe are you going to compensate them?

Senator, our job and what we take seriously is making sure that we build

Industry living tools to find harmful to make money, take it off the services to make money and to build tools that empower parents.

So you didn't take any action.

You didn't take any action.

You didn't fire anybody.

You haven't compensated a single victim.

Let me ask you this.

There's families of victims here today.

Have you apologized to the victims?

I've, Would you like to do so now?

Well, they're here.

You're on national television.

Would you like now to apologize to the victims who have been harmed by your product?

Show them the pictures.

Would you like to apologize for what you've done to these good people?

I-- I'm sorry, but everything that we have all ..

100

It's why we invested so much, and everyone's going to continue doing these three big efforts.

101

to make sure that No one has to go.

102

- There's a type of thing.

103

members.

104

You know?

105

Why Mr Zuckerberg, why should your company not be sued for this?

106

Why is it that you can claim you hide behind a liability shield?

107

You can't be held accountable.

108

Shouldn't you be held accountable personally?

109

Will you take personal responsibility?

110

Senator, I think I've already answered this.

111

I mean, this is - Well try us again.

112

Will you take personal responsibility?

113

Senator, I view my job and the job of our company is building the best tools that we can

114

to keep our community safe.

115

Well, you're failing at that.

116

Well, Senator, we're doing an industry leading effort.

117

We build AI tools that-- Your product is killing people.

118

Will you personally commit to compensating the victims?

119

You're a billionaire.

120

Will you commit to compensating the victims?

121

Will you set up a compensation fund with your money?

122

These are-- With your money.

123

Senator, these are complicated.

124

Yes.

125

No, that's not a complicated question, though.

126

That's a yes or no. Will you set up a victim's compensation fund with your money, the money you made on these families sitting behind you?

127

Yes or no?

128

Senator I don't think that that's my job is sounds like a no good tools.

129

My job is to make sure that your job is to be responsible for what your company has done.

130

You've made billions of dollars on the people sitting behind them.

131

Are you here?

132

You've done nothing to help them.

133

You've done nothing to compensate them.

134

You've done nothing to put it right.

135

You could do so here today and you should.

136

You should Mr Zuckerberg.

शैडोइंग तकनीक क्या है?

शैडोइंग (Shadowing) एक विज्ञान-समर्थित भाषा सीखने की तकनीक है जो मूल रूप से पेशेवर दुभाषिया प्रशिक्षण के लिए विकसित की गई थी। विधि सरल लेकिन शक्तिशाली है: आप मूल अंग्रेज़ी ऑडियो सुनते हैं और तुरंत इसे ज़ोर से दोहराते हैं — जैसे वक्ता की छाया 1-2 सेकंड की देरी से। शोध से पता चलता है कि यह उच्चारण सटीकता, स्वर, लय, जुड़ी हुई ध्वनियाँ, सुनने की समझ और बोलने की प्रवाहशीलता में काफ़ी सुधार करता है।

ShadowingEnglish.com – अंग्रेज़ी शैडोइंग अभ्यास

शैडोइंग अभ्यास: Zuckerberg and Senator Hawley clash in fiery child safety hearing - YouTube के साथ अंग्रेजी बोलना सीखें

संदर्भ और पृष्ठभूमि

दैनिक संचार के लिए शीर्ष 5 वाक्यांश

स्टेप-बाय-स्टेप शैडोइंग गाइड

शैडोइंग तकनीक क्या है?

शैडोइंग अभ्यास: Zuckerberg and Senator Hawley clash in fiery child safety hearing - YouTube के साथ अंग्रेजी बोलना सीखें

ऐप डाउनलोड करें

संदर्भ और पृष्ठभूमि

दैनिक संचार के लिए शीर्ष 5 वाक्यांश

स्टेप-बाय-स्टेप शैडोइंग गाइड

शैडोइंग तकनीक क्या है?