Pratica di Shadowing: 5 Books Better Than The Movie - Impara a parlare inglese con YouTube
C1
There's a lot of debate about which movies are better than the book,
190 frasi
Se le frasi sono troppo corte o troppo lunghe, clicca su Edit per modificarle.
1
There's a lot of debate about which movies are better than the book,
2
but some adaptations are universally considered to have missed the mark.
3
Here are five books that were definitely better than the movie.
4
Number one, The Lovely Bones.
5
The Lovely Bones tells a story of a murdered teenage girl named Susie Salmon.
6
It's told from the point of view of the murdered girl
7
as she watches from the great beyond as her family and friends mourn her and try to move on with their lives.
8
Her actual death is covered in the opening chapter,
9
with the rest of the book describing how her family and friends deal with the loss,
10
which is the story's biggest strength.
11
The mistake the movie makes is that it dedicates nearly half the screen time to the girl's death.
12
Of course, Hollywood would ratchet up this part of the story,
13
but it meant there was less screen time for the friends and family's stories,
14
which is what the readers loved about the book.
15
Susie's mother, father, sister, friends,
16
and even the killer himself have their stories told in the book as she watches on.
17
Since the movie focuses on the who,
18
what, and where of the death,
19
it has little time for these characters to be flushed out.
20
And the director Peter Jackson ramped up the special effects,
21
which shifted viewers' attention from the family and friends to what heaven looks like in this particular story world.
22
Movie critic Roger Ebert went so far as to call this movie deplorable,
23
and he didn't even read the book.
24
He's judging it as a standalone movie.
25
The Lovely Bones is a deplorable film with this message.
26
If you're a 14-year-old girl who has been brutally raped and murdered by a serial killer,
27
you have a lot to look forward to.
28
You can get together in heaven with the other teenage victims of the same killer
29
and gaze down in benevolence upon your family members as they mourn you and realize what a wonderful person you were.
30
Sure, you miss your friends,
31
but your fellow fatalities come dancing to greet you in a meadow of wildflowers,
32
and how cool is that?
33
He goes on to say,
34
It's based on the bestseller by Alice Sebold that everybody seemed to be reading a couple years ago.
35
I hope it's not faithful to the book.
36
If it is, millions of Americans are scary.
37
That's a pretty bold critique.
38
Ebert was an avid reader.
39
I think he would have been pleasantly surprised if he had read the book.
40
It's noted, though, that Saoirse Ronan's performance as the dead girl was widely praised even by critics of the movie.
41
And yes, I had to look up how to pronounce her name correctly.
42
Number two, The Golden Compass.
43
His Dark Materials was the original name of the book.
44
In America, it was released under the name The Golden Compass
45
and later turned into a movie to capitalize on the success of the Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings movies.
46
The book brought a fresh story world to readers
47
when it was initially released in 1995 with its distinctive idea that the characters have mystical animals who accompany them in life.
48
The book alludes to theology,
49
physics, and philosophy through its story elements,
50
and some have called it an atheist's answer to C.S.
51
Lewis's Chronicles of Narnia series.
52
For this reason, the book has been criticized as anti-church,
53
and the author, Philip Pullman,
54
has made no secret of his disdain for the Chronicles of Narnia.
55
He called it a peevish blend of racist, misogynistic, and reactionary prejudice.
56
But of love, of Christian charity,
57
there is not a trace.
58
I need to do a video about writers' feuds.
59
That would be kind of fun.
60
Philip Pullman's story involves children abducted by church members known as gobblers who use them for experiments.
61
Go ahead and draw your own conclusions on what that metaphor represents.
62
When the movie was released,
63
the filmmakers toned down the anti-church rhetoric, angering fans greatly.
64
The movie did okay worldwide,
65
but failed at the North American box office,
66
probably because moviegoers were tired of wizardry and were moving into Twilight territory.
67
The director, Chris Weitz, said he was at odds with new cinema to produce a family film,
68
so he had to tone down the anti-religious material that drew readers to the book in the first place.
69
This turned the movie into a mediocre fantasy picture
70
that left many of the philosophical elements of the book on the cutting room floor.
71
Ironically, the Catholic Church called for boycotts of the movie despite the fact
72
that the studio caved in and removed the anti-church material.
73
In 2008, what was going to be a series of movies was put on indefinite hold.
74
Number three, Cloud Atlas.
75
Cloud Atlas is a novel
76
that tells six stories in six different time periods from the 1800s to the future where humans exist in a post-apocalyptic world.
77
It's an ambitious story that succeeds greatly in what it's set out to do.
78
The book came out in 2004 and the Wachowskis made it into a movie in 2012.
79
The novel structures its six stories in a unique way,
80
it splits each one in two for a total of 12 sections.
81
The first half of each story is told in chronological order,
82
one through six, and then the second half of each story is told in reverse chronological order,
83
going from six back down to one where we started.
84
The stories are united in a few common themes of how we treat people,
85
reincarnation, and humankind's yearning to be free.
86
The movie was polarizing among critics and audiences,
87
with some saying it was the best film of the year and others saying it was the worst.
88
Some audiences found it hard to follow since it jumped around in time
89
and some critics found the project to be a highly self-indulgent
90
project with actors showing off their ability to be covered in makeup and speak in different accents.
91
My own opinion though is I thought the movie failed for the simple reason
92
that they abandoned the more linear format of the book and allowed it to jump around sort of pulp fiction style.
93
One technique the book employs is that each of the six stories builds on the previous story,
94
sort of like one of those Russian nesting dolls.
95
The 1-2-3-4-5-6-6-5-4-3-2-1 format was perfect for that storytelling technique.
96
The choice to abandon this format in the movie
97
and jump around between the six stories actually made the movie more confusing for me,
98
despite the fact that I read the book.
99
I have to imagine audiences who didn't read the book would be even more lost and confused.
100
I think the movie would have been better
101
if they had just stuck to the more linear format to the book but I still appreciate the Wachowski's efforts.
102
The movie is an achievement of artistic endeavor.
103
I'd rather see an ambitious failure than a safe formula any day,
104
but I understand why audiences might be turned off by it.
105
I still own the Blu-ray and watch it every now and then.
106
Despite its flaws, the movie deserves to be seen simply because it exists.
107
Number four, The Scarlet Letter.
108
Nathaniel Hawthorne's Scarlet Letter is about a woman suffering after being
109
caught as an adulterer in a strict religious community in 17th century Boston.
110
The story explores themes of sin and guilt and was made into a much hated by critics movie back in 1995.
111
The movie's main sin is probably related to the casting of Demi Moore back
112
when she was considered the hottest actress in Hollywood.
113
At the time, she was known for sexually charged movies like Indecent Proposal and Disclosure.
114
The movie is shot with an obvious nod to grocery store paperback eroticism.
115
The movie adaptation drops the themes of sin and guilt to highlighting hypocrisy of religious zealots,
116
which might be an admirable theme,
117
but it's not what Hawthorne's story was trying to do.
118
The book starts at her trial,
119
but the movie recounts the events leading up to the trial,
120
since that's where all the eroticism would take place,
121
and thus capitalizing on the bodies of these great-looking actors.
122
In Roger Ebert's scathing one-and-a-half-star review,
123
he wrote, The great inconvenience of the scarlet letter from a Hollywood point of view is
124
that the novel begins after the adultery has taken place.
125
This will not do.
126
If you haven't figured it out yet,
127
I was a huge follower of Roger Ebert,
128
so you're going to see quite a few quotes of his in my videos.
129
Fans of the movie will point out that the movie should be seen as standalone from the book,
130
with some praising to me more in Gary Oldman's performances,
131
while followers of the book consider the movie to be an injustice to an American classic.
132
Number five, Atlas Shrugged.
133
Atlas Shrugged has earned its place as a literary classic,
134
although it has its share of critics.
135
Even if you are not a subscriber of Ayn Rand's philosophy of objectivism,
136
many have said the book is too long and repetitive in its themes,
137
and that Miss Rand should have employed a manuscript editor to trim some of the fat.
138
I read the book a few years ago and agree with those criticisms,
139
but I still think that launching a philosophy through fictional storytelling is a monumental achievement in literature.
140
With that said, the movie adaptation is awful.
141
For years, there was an effort to bring this story to the big screen,
142
but the holders of the book's rights insisted that the core message of objectivism and the long speeches remain in the script.
143
Ayn Rand did manage to get one of her books turned into a movie,
144
which was The Fountainhead.
145
It was said that she hated the results as the message of individual freedom was somewhat muddied in the film version.
146
This likely led to a lifetime of skepticism and handing over the creative decision-making for Atlas Shrugged to Hollywood.
147
The book was turned into a trilogy back in 2011 at a time
148
when the message of the book might be better received at the height of the Great Recession,
149
but it was largely panned by critics who either thought it was bad or just plain dull.
150
The book has several scenes of internal dialogue which outline the logic behind objectivism.
151
However, it's difficult to film internal dialogue unless you use intrusive voiceover like Dexter or Narcos,
152
so to someone not familiar with the tenets of objectivism,
153
the movie's message is somewhat vague.
154
One departure from the book that the movie makes is
155
that it's set in present times and alludes to the 2008 economic collapse,
156
but still focuses on the rail industry.
157
It of course explains why rail is still important to our economy,
158
but not very convincingly.
159
It would have been better to have just left it in the 1940s.
160
Most likely this was a budgetary concern that led to this decision.
161
Also, for some reason, the filmmakers decided to cast different actors in the roles for each of the three installments.
162
Three different actors to play Dagny,
163
three different actors to play Hank Reardon,
164
three different actors to play Jim Taggart.
165
What an odd choice.
166
But then again, I guess the James Bond franchise got away with this.
167
Not that my opinion matters,
168
but if I had my way,
169
I would have the movie take place in the 1940s like the book,
170
and I'd add a touch of magical realism.
171
The book is a perfect candidate for steampunk.
172
Remember that movie Sky Captain in the World of Tomorrow?
173
I think that sort of look would be perfect for Atlas Shrugged rather than trying to piggyback it on the 2008 recession.
174
I hope someday someone gives it another shot for adaptation.
175
A 10-part miniseries might be a better route to take.
176
And I remember when I saw Atlas Shrugged in the theater,
177
the movie got an applause from the sparse audience.
178
The applause was very subdued golf clap.
179
I think they were clapping at the fact that it finally got done after 50 years of development purgatory,
180
not because it was a good movie.
181
So I do hope they get a second shot to get this adaptation right.
182
If you're an Atlas Shrugged fan,
183
how would you film the book and capture the ideas of objectivism on film?
184
It's quite a challenge for the medium of film.
185
As a former filmmaker, I'd love to hear your ideas.
186
That's it for this week.
187
Please check out my own book,
188
Grand Portage, about a man who drags a nuclear aircraft carrier across northern Minnesota.
189
It's available on Amazon and paperback and Kindle.
190
Thanks for watching and never stop reading.
Scarica l'app
Valutazione AI per ogni frase che pronunci
TRENDING
Popolari
Perché praticare parlando con questo video?
Questo video offre un'ottima opportunità per praticare la conversazione in inglese attraverso una critica di film tratti da libri. Esplorando le opinioni dell'oratore sui punti di forza e di debolezza delle adattazioni filmiche, gli spettatori possono migliorare la loro competenza linguistica mentre si immergono in un contesto culturale ricco. Attraverso l’',emozione e la critica, voi potete imparare a esprimere sentimenti e opinioni personali, fondamentali per la comunicazione in inglese.
Grammatica & Espressioni nel contesto
Nel discorso, sono presenti diverse strutture grammaticali utili per i parlanti di inglese. Ecco alcuni esempi:
- Uso del presente semplice: L'oratore usa il presente semplice per esprimere opinioni e fatti, come in "some adaptations are universally considered". Questa struttura è fondamentale per descrivere situazioni generali.
- Frasi condizionali: Frasi come "if it is, millions of Americans are scary” mostrano come formare ipotesi e condizioni, importante per argomentare o discuterne un tema.
- Parole e frasi d'impatto: Espressioni come "deplorable" o "missed the mark" possono essere utilizzate per comunicare giudizi e critiche, utili per enfatizzare i propri punti di vista.
Trappole di pronuncia comuni
Nella visione di questo video, è possibile incontrare alcune parole di difficile pronuncia. Ecco alcuni suggerimenti con cui fare attenzione:
- Lovely: La pronuncia può essere ingannevole; è un termine che potrebbe sembrare semplice, ma è importante praticare la sua fluidità nel contesto della frase.
- Deplorable: Attenzione alla pronuncia di questa parola complessa. Praticarla può aiutarvi a utilizzarla correttamente nei propri discorsi.
- Compass: In molte lingue, la pronuncia di ’compass’ può differire; prestare attenzione all'accento e alla corretta intonazione è fondamentale.
Immaginate di utilizzare shadowspeak mentre guardate il video! Le tecniche di shadowing in inglese possono aiutarvi a migliorare la vostra dizione e fluency. Iniziate oggi a imparare l'inglese con youtube e godetevi un modo nuovo per migliorare le vostre abilità linguistiche!
Cos'è la tecnica dello Shadowing?
Shadowing è una tecnica di apprendimento delle lingue supportata da studi scientifici, originariamente sviluppata per la formazione dei traduttori professionisti e resa popolare dal poliglotta Dr. Alexander Arguelles. Il metodo è semplice ma potente: ascolti un audio in inglese di madrelingua e lo ripeti immediatamente ad alta voce — come un'ombra che segue il parlante con un ritardo di solo 1–2 secondi. A differenza dell'ascolto passivo o degli esercizi di grammatica, lo shadowing costringe il tuo cervello e i muscoli della bocca a elaborare e riprodurre simultaneamente i modelli di discorso reale. La ricerca dimostra che migliora significativamente la precisione della pronuncia, l'intonazione, il ritmo, il discorso connesso, la comprensione dell'ascolto e la fluidità del parlato — rendendolo uno dei metodi più efficaci per la preparazione alla prova di speaking dell'IELTS e per la comunicazione reale in inglese.
☕ Offrici un caffè
ShadowingEnglish rimane gratuito al 100% grazie al tuo supporto. I costi del server e IA sono elevati — il tuo caffè ci aiuta ad andare avanti! 🙏