Pratica di Shadowing: The AI Take Over Has Completely Backfired (Here's the Proof) - Impara a parlare inglese con i video

Scegli una modalità di pratica

Ogni modalità apre una sala di pratica a schermo intero.

128 frasi

Se le frasi sono troppo corte o troppo lunghe, clicca su Edit per modificarle.

AI was supposed to change everything, replace millions of jobs, transform every industry, and become the biggest technological shift in history.

But there's just one problem.

The numbers don't seem to add up.

Big tech is expected to spend around $725 billion on AI this year.

Meanwhile, the entire global market for AI services generated only around $25 billion last year.

That means for every $10 these companies are pouring into AI infrastructure, they're getting back only about 25 cents in revenue.

And now the cracks are becoming harder to ignore.

Products are being shut down.

The cost of running AI keeps exploding.

Lawsuits are piling up.

And investors are starting to ask the question nobody wanted to ask two years ago.

Where's the money?

So is AI actually the next technological revolution?

Or are we watching one of the biggest tech bubbles in history start to burst?

Hi friends, I'm Maddie.

I'm a senior software engineer who previously worked Google, Internet, other bictict companies like Amazon, IBM, and Microsoft.

For two years now, the story I've been told, that you've been told, is that AI was about to replace every engineer alive.

We are not far from the world.

I think we'll be there in three to six months where AI is writing 90% of the code.

And then in 12 months, we may be in a world where AI is writing essentially all of the code.

But as of now, the money flow doesn't exactly match up to this story.

So in In this video, I'll break down why the AI hype is cracking in 2026, the spending method doesn't close, the AI products quietly getting switched off,

and the legal problem no one thought about until too late.

Let's get into it.

We're going to start with the amount of money companies are spending on AI.

The five companies building this infrastructure, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and Oracle,

are on track for roughly $725 billion of capital expenditure in 2026.

That's up 77% in a single year, and it was around $162 billion back in 2022.

Goldman Sachs predicts that the total spend will be past $7.6 trillion through 2031. To put

that into perspective, $725 billion a year is more than the entire

annual GDP of Switzerland being spent by a handful of companies on hardware

that loses most of its value in three or four years.

And so here's the problem.

That money isn't coming from spare cash anymore.

Rather, it's eating companies alive.

JP Morgan estimates AI capital expenditure went from around a third

of hyperscaler operating cash flow in 2023 to roughly 93% in 2026.

Their combined free cash flow, the actual money left over, fell to about $7 billion in the second quarter of 2026,

down from $60 billion at the end of 2025.

And analysts expect it to go negative this quarter.

Amazon is looking at deeply negative free cash flow this year.

Microsoft has told investors that its spare cash is shrinking, and it left a $60 billion buyback basically sitting there, unused.

So the richest companies on earth are borrowing hard against a payoff that hasn't arrived yet.

And the moment that made everyone realize how dangerous this could be is when DeepSeek, a Chinese startup that in early 2025 trained a competitive model for a few million dollars,

erased something like $600 billion of NVIDIA's value in one trading day, the single largest day wipeout any US stock has ever taken.

DeepSeek's success forced every investor to ask this very important question, what are we actually getting for all this spend?

And even if that money were all there, the electricity and the infrared might not be.

That part often doesn't get talked about as much because it's much less exciting than those stock charts.

But there is a hard physical limit.

Training and running these models eat staggering amounts of power.

The International Energy Agency says electricity demand from data centers jumped 17% in 2025, and the AI-specific slice grew closer to 50%.

In the US, data centers are now driving about half of all new electricity demand growth.

The grid just simply can't keep pace

because capital moves at the speed of markets and power plants move at the speed of permits and construction.

Gartner is already projecting that power shortages could constrain 40% of AI data centers by 2027.

So you have companies committing hundreds of billions of dollars to build-outs that physically cannot happen yet,

and quietly signing deals for their own nuclear reactors to get around this limitation.

That is not the behavior of an industry that has everything figured out.

In addition to the massive cost of AI, it might seem as though projects keep on failing even with the help of AI.

An MIT report found that roughly 95% of enterprise-generative AI pilots delivered no measurable return on investment.

However, there's a bit more to that number.

It does measure whether a pilot moved the bottom line within about six months, and a lot of them were in marketing, which is a hard place to show fast returns.

Also, internally built AI tools succeeded about a third of the time, while vendor-based ones succeeded about two thirds.

So most companies seem as though they're using it to solve problems that don't return much.

This is the phenomenon even in large companies.

For example, Amazon set a target of getting 80% of its developers using AI tools every week

and built an internal leaderboard called KiroRank that scored engineers on how much AI they used.

So then naturally, as you can imagine, engineers started pointing AI agents at pointless, made-up tasks purely to run up their token counts and climb the board,

a move the industry has coined token taxing.

It drove up Amazon's own compute bill for basically nothing.

So in May of 2026, they officially killed the leaderboard, and a senior VP had to send around a note saying, please don't use AI just for the sake of AI.

Also, a recent survey of more than 2,500 enterprises found

that around 74% of companies that put a live AI customer service agent into production had to roll it back.

So while the demo looks incredible, productionization is harder, especially in legacy systems full of edge cases the demo never saw or trained on.

The reason why these AI agents are getting switched off isn't only because they're wrong.

It's because that when they're wrong, the company can get into liability and big legal trouble.

Late last year, the Australian government paid Deloitte around $440,000 for a report on a welfare system.

A researcher started reading it and noticed something off.

The report cited academic papers that just didn't exist and quoted a federal court judge saying something that the judge never said.

It turns out that Deloitte had actually been using Gen.ai to help write it, and the AI had just hallucinated its sources.

Deloitte ended up issuing a corrected version and refunded part of the fee.

The lesson here is pretty stark.

If your AI puts something in front of a client, you are liable for what it outputs.

You don't get to blame it on the software.

Now, stack that on top of hallucinations would turn out to be really stubborn.

One 2026 benchmark that tested 37 different models clocked made-up answer rates anywhere from 15 to 52 percent.

And oddly, several of the newer reasoning models actually did it more often than the older ones, not less.

On legal questions in particular, Stanford put the range of hallucination at somewhere between 58 percent and 88 percent.

So put yourself in a Fortune 500 boardroom.

You've got a tool that that will confidently make things up some meaningful fraction of the time, a core precedent saying you own every word it says,

and insurers who've started writing outright AI exclusions into their policies because they can't price the risk.

What do you do?

You quietly kill a lot of those customer-facing agents.

So we have now a grim picture of the AI ecosystem.

The spending is unsustainable, the pilots mostly fail, and the agents are getting retracted.

So what should you do with this information if you're building a career?

There are three things.

Number one, don't confuse the bubble with the technology.

For example, the dot-com crash didn't mean that the internet was fake, but it meant the money had run way ahead of the value

100

and the correction wiped out everyone with no real business underneath.

101

The same sort of principle can be applied here.

102

You can think about it like this.

103

Would a tool still be worth using if AI got 10 times more expensive to run?

104

Real models with real products underneath will survive that.

105

Number two, become the person who owns the output, not the person who produces it.

106

Every failure we talked about in this video, for example, the dead pilots, the agents getting rolled back, Deloitte handing the government a faulty report, is caused

107

because of the lack of type of this person someone who can catch what the AI got wrong

108

and take responsibility for it.

109

That role is growing while the just generate code role shrinks.

110

So you should use AI every day, ship fast with it, and stay accountable for what it produces.

111

And build robust eval and verification systems.

112

And number three, last but not least, go where the deflation sends the money.

113

So when a bubble sorts itself out, the money that was pumped into it doesn't just disappear, but instead it gets deflected toward products that can actually prove their worth.

114

AI security is a good example.

115

Every one of these systems getting shipped is an attack surface almost nobody can defend yet.

116

Same with the people who can integrate AI into real systems, evaluate it, and make it reliable instead of just impressive on stage in a controlled environment.

117

So you should specialize into the part that needs human judgment.

118

So in conclusion, here's the real story of whether AI is all hype or not in 2006.

119

Yes, AI stocks are getting hammered.

120

Yes, 95% of those enterprise pilots went nowhere.

121

And yes, the AI replaces everyone mantra is getting walked back in boardrooms across the industry.

122

But none of that means AI itself is finished.

123

The internet survived the crash and came back bigger.

124

So AI will be fine.

125

The only question here is whether you'll come out of this as someone who chased the bubble

126

or if you'll become someone who understood what was actually valuable underneath it.

127

And that's all I have for you in this video.

128

If this perspective was helpful, hit that like button, hype the video, and subscribe for more videos on software engineering, AI, and tech.

Scarica l'app

Tutto ciò che serve per parlare fluentemente

Pronuncia con IAVoto per ogni frase

Pratica IPAPadroneggia ogni suono

VocabolarioCostruisci il tuo lessico

Gioco di vocabolarioImpara giocando

Scansiona QR

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

📺 Stesso Canale

How I use AI as a senior software engineer and 5 principles of AI explained in 10 minutes

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

✨ Video consigliato

76 frasi

Leading AI CEOs Warn UN Security Council of Existential Risks | Sam Altman On AI Controls | N18G

Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students

145 frasi

Which Commercial property sectors will benefit from AI? | The Market in Minutes

Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

42 frasi

What 50% Unemployment Will Actually Do to the Economy

IELTS PrepBusiness EnglishUniversity Students

Il contesto: L'IA tra ipotesi e realtà

Nel video, Maddie, un ingegnere software con esperienza in grandi aziende tech, analizza il gap tra l'hype sull'IA e i dati reali. Spiega come le aziende investano miliardi in infrastrutture, ma i ricavi non corrispondono, portando a chiusure di prodotti, costi in crescita e questioni legali. Un contesto pratico e attuale per esercitarti con l'inglese, perché le conversazioni reali spesso trattano temi di attualità!

Frasi e collocazioni utili da memorizzare

"The numbers don't add up": I numeri non tornano. Una frase perfetta per esprimere dubbi su dati o situazioni.
"Cracks are becoming harder to ignore": Le crepe sono sempre più evidenti. Utile per descrivere problemi che emergono.
"Eat companies alive": Devora le aziende. Un'espressione vividissima per parlare di costi ingenti.
"Borrow against a payoff": Prendere in prestito aspettandosi un ritorno. Comune nel contesto finanziario.
"Hard physical limit": Limite fisico rigido. Ideale per discutere di vincoli reali (es. energia, risorse).

La tua sfida: Shadowing in inglese per migliorare la pronuncia

Ora è il momento di mettere in pratica! Il shadowing è una tecnica fantastica per migliorare la pronuncia e l'intonazione. Ecco come fare: riproduci un frammento del video (20-30 secondi), ascolta attentamente, poi ripetilo immediatamente, imitando il tono, la velocità e le pause di Maddie. Ripeti il processo 3-4 volte finché non senti che fluire. Prova con la frase: "The money flow doesn't exactly match up to this story". Noterai che "match up to" ha una pronuncia soft, e la pausa dopo "flow" è importante. Con il shadow speak, ogni minuto di pratica ti avvicina a un inglese più naturale. Imparare l'inglese con i video non è mai stato così efficace: usa questo contesto reale per fare progressi veloci!

La grammatica di questo video

Le strutture che chi parla usa di più, con le parole esatte del video:

Struttura	Nel video
Forma passiva be + participio passato — conta ciò che accade, non chi lo fa	is expected · being shut · I've been told
Present perfect have/has + participio passato — un’azione passata che conta ancora adesso	I've been told · has told · hasn't arrived
Frasi relative who / which + frase — un’informazione in più su una persona o una cosa	marketing, which is · person who owns · someone who can

Cos'è la tecnica dello Shadowing?

Shadowing è una tecnica di apprendimento delle lingue supportata da studi scientifici, originariamente sviluppata per la formazione dei traduttori professionisti e resa popolare dal poliglotta Dr. Alexander Arguelles. Il metodo è semplice ma potente: ascolti un audio in inglese di madrelingua e lo ripeti immediatamente ad alta voce — come un'ombra che segue il parlante con un ritardo di solo 1–2 secondi. A differenza dell'ascolto passivo o degli esercizi di grammatica, lo shadowing costringe il tuo cervello e i muscoli della bocca a elaborare e riprodurre simultaneamente i modelli di discorso reale. La ricerca dimostra che migliora significativamente la precisione della pronuncia, l'intonazione, il ritmo, il discorso connesso, la comprensione dell'ascolto e la fluidità del parlato — rendendolo uno dei metodi più efficaci per la preparazione alla prova di speaking dell'IELTS e per la comunicazione reale in inglese.

Tecnica dello shadowing: leggi la guida completa passo dopo passo →

Pratica di Shadowing: The AI Take Over Has Completely Backfired (Here's the Proof) - Impara a parlare inglese con i video

Scegli una modalità di pratica

Scarica l'app

How I use AI as a senior software engineer and 5 principles of AI explained in 10 minutes

The Limitless AI Lie. The Bubble Is Slowly BURSTING.

how AI broke the SWE Career Ladder

Everyone Is Wrong About AI Coding

Something Feels Off About 2026...

Elon Musk Explains How the AI Bubble Will Burst.

Meta’s Llama 4 is mindblowing… but did it cheat?

The AI Bubble… We Need to Talk

The Alignment Problem Explained: Crash Course Futures of AI #4

Did Google just kickstart the intelligence explosion?