Pratica di Shadowing: The Future of Higher Education - Impara a parlare inglese con i video
Scegli una modalità di pratica
Ogni modalità apre una sala di pratica a schermo intero.
658 frasi
Se le frasi sono troppo corte o troppo lunghe, clicca su Edit per modificarle.
1
Hello and good evening.
2
I'm Josh Brumberg, president of the CUNY Graduate Center, and it's my pleasure to welcome you to tonight's timely discussion of the future of higher education.
3
And yes, it does have a future.
4
We are honored to host this event at such a pivotal moment.
5
Higher education faces pressures few of us could have imagined even months ago when this event was first planned.
6
That's why it's so important to bring together experienced leaders and proven innovators to help envision a pathway forward.
7
The Graduate Center is a fitting venue for a conversation of this step.
8
Founded over 60 years ago, we are the only research-intensive public graduate school in New York City.
9
We are proud to be one of the 25 campuses of the City University of New York, the nation's largest urban public university.
10
We offer most of the doctoral degrees within the City University system, 31 in total in the alphabetical app in the academic alphabet
11
of biochemistry to urban education with 18 master's degrees from astrophysics to women and gender studies.
12
Our graduate students annually teach over a hundred and twenty thousand CUNY undergraduates bringing the latest from their seminars and laboratories
13
directly to the classrooms.
14
Through public programs such as the one you will experience tonight, we take pride in sharing the latest results, advances, and ideas of our faculty,
15
staff, and students with the public that supports us and that we are embedded within.
16
The Graduate Center is the proud home of the Futures Initiative, which we'll be celebrating tonight.
17
For just over a decade, the initiative has been a leader in advancing equity and innovation in research, teaching, and in public service in higher education.
18
Tonight we're not only hosting a thought-provoking conversation,
19
we're also celebrating the 10th anniversary of the Futures Initiative and the remarkable accomplishments and vision of its founder,
20
distinguished professor Kathy Davidson.
21
I'm proud to celebrate the enormous contributions that Kathy has made to our university and to higher education in our country.
22
Thank you Kathy for your vision, your passion, and for all the work that you
23
and your colleagues at the Future Initiative have done to advocate for greater equity and propel changes in higher education.
24
Kathy as you may know is preparing to retire from her CUNY roles
25
which has been many including as a special advisor to the Chancellor on transformation these past few years.
26
She has truly left her mark.
27
Congratulations also to incoming director of the Futures Initiative, Professor Shelley Eversley.
28
And somewhere in the crowd, Executive Director Adashima Oyo.
29
and special thanks to the diverse community of doctoral students postgraduate researchers faculty
30
and most of all the students who have been part of the futures initiatives mission of breaking down educational social
31
and economic barriers and promoting investment in higher education as a of public good.
32
That is what this year's anniversary events have all been about, conversations about the future of learning, of research, of the planet,
33
and tonight's culminating panel on the future of higher education.
34
Nobody ever accused the Futures Initiative of thinking small.
35
I will leave the introductions to Shelley, but I do want to welcome our distinguished visiting panelists,
36
Shelley Lowe, Maurice Wallace, welcome home one of my predecessors Bill Kelly
37
and thanks to my colleague Nancy Cantor for all participating tonight.
38
I'm looking forward to what I'm sure will be a critical
39
and provocative discussion of the way forward at a time
40
when all of us in higher education are facing so many challenges and newfound threats to our mission.
41
It's my honor to turn things over to Shelly.
42
Good evening, everyone.
43
It is really great to be here.
44
And thank you, President Brumberg, and thank you to the Futures Initiative team,
45
the fellows, the staff, Executive Director,
46
Dr. Adashima Oyo, for all of this behind-the-scenes work that put this together.
47
I'd like to say hello to everyone who's logged in logged
48
in we have over 500 rsbps who are watching this streaming this now
49
and we're going to get started it's really wonderful to be
50
here with you all right now you can see their titles here
51
these distinguished leaders and we will get right into it with president nancy canter with with the incredible Kathy,
52
I was going to say F Davidson, Kathy N Davidson.
53
William E.
54
Kelly, he lets me call him Bill now.
55
Shelly Lowe and Maurice Wallace.
56
Thank you so much for coming today.
57
To the members of the audience, please note that you should have received some cards, cards, note cards and maybe a pencil.
58
We will accept your questions so please write down your questions as they come to you
59
and somewhere as we proceed ushers will collect them.
60
And if you could, especially all of you with PhDs, you know who you are, please write neatly.
61
You can use all caps because I have to read your questions.
62
So thank you for that and we will just jump right in.
63
I have notes.
64
None of us needs to be reminded of course about the extreme pressures facing higher education today not only
65
because of the defunding of public education
66
that was really moving in full force since the 1980s
67
but also within the last few months the defunding of public institutions like the National Endowment for the Humanities, the National Science of Foundation,
68
National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, plus libraries, museums, cultural and historical centers all across the United States.
69
While some of these institutions have powerfully and collectively responded to these pressures,
70
others have capitulated in a way that is shameful for anyone who's thinking about higher education for the public good.
71
We know this.
72
We all know this and one of the reasons why we're here in this room is
73
because we are well aware of the pressures facing us today.
74
And so what we thought we'd do with the Futures Initiative is thinking about the future.
75
Thinking about the ways that we can build and grow and create a future.
76
So let's use this time, this conversation today to model a way forward.
77
And here I'm thinking of something Shelley Lo said to me earlier today to think about the endurances, to think about the future,
78
not just for us, but for the people who will be around when we're gone, for the people 30 years from now,
79
50 years from now, what will we do today that will help ensure opportunities for the public good,
80
for learning, thinking critically, for the arts, for science, for research?
81
What are we going to do today that will inspire
82
and help the future endure in a way that we are so deeply committed?
83
We have such an incredible brain chest with us today with these incredibly distinguished institutional leaders, people who have committed their careers,
84
their intellects, all of their powerful minds to public higher education and higher education in general.
85
And so let's use their minds and when you're thinking about this, let's take this opportunity to get into it so we can build
86
and create something that will make us all really, really proud.
87
So this is my first question for everyone.
88
And that is, we all know there has been a longstanding hostility towards arts and the humanities.
89
And now, the sciences from climate change to vaccines are the brunt of this critique.
90
Why?
91
How?
92
What are some of the ways
93
that all of the disciplines can work together to defend and fight for the importance of knowledge, research, and critical understanding?
94
I'm also here thinking about institutions like the National Endowment for the Humanities.
95
What are we gonna do?
96
NIH, NEA.
97
So here's the question.
98
What are some of the ways that all the disciplines can work together to defend and fight for the importance of knowledge, research, and critical understanding.
99
I'm thinking about this too
100
because the Futures Initiative has had for the past 10 years a series of public lectures called the University Worth Fighting For.
101
And so another way to think about this question is, what is the university that we are fighting for?
102
I will start with you, President Cantor.
103
Thank you so much.
104
Thank you for having me here today.
105
So I think the first thing we have to do is step back and say,
106
who are we working with when we think about the sciences, the arts, and humanities?
107
We need to be working with people on the ground in our communities to make it clear
108
that in fact the arts and humanities are critical to human health,
109
to well-being, to the success of their children, to the ability of people to thrive.
110
That's all very good and general.
111
But when you get on the ground, for example, I always point to the Humanities Action Lab.
112
They take students and faculty and storytellers through the communities to talk about climates of inequality,
113
to do science on the ground, to think about how flood resistance is going to be so critical in New York City.
114
We have phenomenal car C mappings at Hunter.
115
They need to be out with the people.
116
We need to create a two-way street, what I like to call a community of experts with and without pedigree,
117
who really co-produce those solutions.
118
When you go out on the ground in community, nobody thinks higher ed is some thing you could get rid of.
119
This whole notion that the public doesn't like higher ed, nobody's talking to the public.
120
Kathy?
121
I recently heard an interview with the head of Uber who said that he learned two things in college, how to be a good business person and how to tell stories.
122
And I thought that was fascinating because I think one of the things
123
that we have to do in higher education is really work on our storytelling
124
and needless to say we've got an audience of here who is here because they're interested in higher ed.
125
So we all have to tell that story.
126
But I agree with you completely.
127
When people talk about how there's people have lost faith in higher ed, they're rarely talking about their own children, right?
128
They're working very, very hard to make sure their own kids are going to college.
129
And we know, we have all the statistics, salary improves, health outcomes improved,
130
marital status improves, colon cancer.
131
I mean there are all of these things people have correlated with living a healthier lifestyle, being fortunate enough to have a job that you care about.
132
Our students at CUNY don't have to be told about the importance of higher education.
133
They're often the people, our students are often the people from their family who are the first person to go to college.
134
And they're often supporting not only themselves while they're going to college, but helping their families be supported.
135
They're the most optimistic and positive people I know when it comes to higher education.
136
I think we need to send our students out into the world to talk about not only the importance of higher education, but how things are related.
137
I can't think of any important issue that isn't some combination of technology, concerns, about technology, privacy, surveillance,
138
concern about how you'd portray that, that storytelling, art, all of those things, and the science of it.
139
Those are all connected in life.
140
And in fact, it's school that sets those into subjects.
141
It's life.
142
It is how we live our lives.
143
And we can tell that story, and we need to tell that story passionately, and over and over again.
144
Thank you, Kathy.
145
Thinking about this, the people, Nancy, the idea that we learn inside outside of the classroom,
146
and Kathy, the idea that storytelling is as important as science.
147
And I'm thinking about this in terms of the university we're fighting for, and I'm looking at you, Bill Kelly, I get to call him Bill.
148
I'm thinking about, I know everyone calls him Bill, but I feel very special nonetheless.
149
I'm thinking about you, Bill Kelly, having served as the president of the university and also director of a research library.
150
What is it that we're fighting for?
151
Yeah, that's a great question, Shelley, and I'll build on both Nancy and, excuse me, Kathy's responses.
152
Perhaps a somewhat darker tone, but building on what they had to say this is a
153
kind of rechercher le temps perdu evening for me 25 years ago i mean it's horrifying to think
154
that on this stage i had a public conversation with jim duder stat one of
155
predecessors a good friend of many of us on on the
156
stage jim had recently retired after a a distinguished career at the University of Michigan
157
and he was involved in the millennial project that Vartan Gregorian was writing
158
and he was talking about yep you guessed it the future of public higher education
159
and he and I talked for about an hour and a half
160
that evening it was a remarkable conversation and I asked him some version of the question Shelley just asked us I mean, what is, what are we defending?
161
What is the nature of the university?
162
What are the biggest challenges?
163
What would you change after your long and distinguished career?
164
And Jim immediately said, look,
165
I would like to rebuild the relationship between the University of Michigan or all public universities and the funding constituencies.
166
By that he meant taxpayers in the state of Michigan.
167
He felt that that connection, which had been born in 1862 with the Morrell Act and the land grant had been severed to some extent.
168
And that what Jim said was that everything we wanna do
169
and all of the challenges we want to meet depend upon allies.
170
Allies who understand the importance of what we do, of what our contributions to their lives, to their children's lives.
171
And then he ticked off a lot of problems under the general subsuming category of demography is destiny.
172
And he talked about aging populations, particularly in the upper Midwest.
173
He talked about demands for tax relief,
174
for security, for housing, for fear about social security disappearance, social safety nets.
175
He said, how do we persuade them, because many of them are aging and their children are not in college at this point, how do we persuade them of how important
176
University of Michigan is and why they should support it beyond the question of football teams.
177
And what he said was, it's very simple, we need to make ourselves indispensable.
178
And for me, that has been the kind of North Star in what I've done, worked, the work that I've been fortunate enough to do at CUNY,
179
at the New York Public Library, at the Guggenheim Foundation, whatever, that for people to care, they have to see you as indispensable in their lives.
180
And that is the challenge that we confront sometimes easier sometimes easier varied on discipline
181
but it's a challenge for all of us thanks bill hi Shelley hi Shelley
182
this has been a fun day it has you want me
183
to answer the same question well I I I can actually refine this question especially as I'm looking at you
184
and Maurice Wallace.
185
Hi Maurice.
186
Call me Maurice, yes.
187
And I was thinking about something that Bill just said.
188
And Bill just said allies.
189
And there's this great book by Jody Dean called Comrade.
190
I don't know if anyone's ever read it.
191
I think she's a political scientist or a political theorist.
192
And in her book, Comrade, she makes this distinction between allies and comrades.
193
And she argues that, I hope I don't mangle this and I'm certainly simplifying this,
194
but she argues that allies kind of stick with you when it's convenient and comfortable.
195
And then comrades hang with you when it's hard and they fight with you when it's necessary.
196
And they're willing to risk with you because you're their comrade, not just an ally, an easy friend.
197
And I wonder when we're thinking about universities worth fighting for, institutions worth fighting for, and I know you're fighting for something.
198
Not defending, but fighting for something if we're thinking about the future.
199
How do you think about this distinction between allies and comrades?
200
And most importantly, here's my question.
201
Do you think, they told me by the way, everyone in this room, we had a pre-meeting and I said, is there anything I'm not supposed to ask?
202
Am I supposed to be gentle?
203
And they all said, no, ask us anything.
204
So here I go.
205
Do you think there's a crisis of confidence or a crisis of,
206
better word, courage for institutional leaders today so that they're maybe showing themselves to be allies and not comrades?
207
Or do you think that we have comrades and if we do, where do we find them and how do we fight with them?
208
You want to go first?
209
Shall we be allies or comrades?
210
Okay, we'll be comrades.
211
So as comrades, you know, one of the things I'd have to come back
212
and say first is we talk to our allies differently than we talk to our comrades, right?
213
We use different language very often, different words.
214
We might joke differently with a comrade than we will with an ally.
215
And that means we're not quite sharing all of the information with our allies the way
216
that we will with a comrade to make them be on our side, right?
217
And to really support the work that we're trying to do.
218
And I think that it's going to come down very often to communication.
219
So I have agreed with everything that's been said so far.
220
We have a problem communicating to the public about what is happening.
221
And is that about courage?
222
Is that about saying I'm not standing up for what's happening?
223
Or is it about just not having the ability and the knowledge to be able to do it?
224
So I think we often have to think this is an all-hands-on-deck moment, especially in higher education.
225
Do not think that this is not that moment.
226
It is that moment.
227
Everybody needs to be talking to each other.
228
Everybody needs to be making comrades with each other because we have to move forward in this together.
229
And when we move forward in this together, we have to have the public on our side.
230
When someone says NEH has cut funding to over 1,000 grants, right, a number of them in higher education institutions, what does the public think?
231
They have no idea what those grants are.
232
They don't know what that money went for.
233
They don't know how that impacts them.
234
Why is that?
235
That's our fault.
236
We haven't told them, we haven't shown them what that work is
237
and how important it is and how it affects them in their everyday lives.
238
We are not treating them as either allies or comrades.
239
And I think that that's one of the things that we always have to be thinking about.
240
What does the public know about what we do and about the impacts of this?
241
So do I think that it's a lack of courage?
242
I think that I'll go back to endurance, Shelley.
243
Sometimes endurance means thinking about the long road and how long it's going to take to get there.
244
And you're going to have to go slow
245
and you're going to have to go easy to make sure you can get there.
246
And sometimes you really have to step it up.
247
You have to jump over whatever hurdle that is and you have to be as loud about it as possible.
248
But I think we all have to assess for ourselves within your institution, within your communities, within your state at what point are you at
249
and where can you do the best thinking about endurance as the long run, right?
250
Thanks.
251
Thank you, comrade. That was marvelous.
252
I don't know that I can say it any better.
253
I might add, however, that in my own imagination,
254
one of the distinctions between the ally and the comrade is that the comrade signs up to be accountable.
255
And accountability, I think, is a thing that we just don't always expect from an ally.
256
An ally might well be an affective relationship, but when the going gets tough,
257
right, You don't want to have to look for your help.
258
The comrade is already there.
259
The comrade is called to this labor in the same way that we're all called to this labor.
260
And I guess I also want to say that it may be
261
that we have not been comrade enough to the communities we have so we seem to have trouble engaging.
262
And it's not just the university itself, but the university has, I think,
263
a responsibility to understand that the community is not them out there,
264
but the institution is also a part of the community and the community is also a part of the institution.
265
I mean, the staff, the faculty, the leadership that makes the university go,
266
we don't live our lives entirely in a kind of academic vacuum,
267
nor do any of the people who labor diligently at a university.
268
So I want to try to imagine what it looks like
269
for a university to talk about us and not mean only those who have,
270
who occupy space on a campus.
271
I want to know what it looks like for an institution to refer to us and have in mind
272
not only academic leaders, academic workers, academic laborers, and support staff,
273
but to think about a broader audience,
274
the audience that a public lecture should invite.
275
And I hope that this institution continues to offer the annual public lecture
276
and be very serious about what it means to invite audiences to a public lecture
277
and make it easy enough for that public to attend those lectures,
278
to advertise public lectures in such a way that the public is interested in in and engages,
279
maybe not even just interested in,
280
but uses platforms where that public finds itself,
281
where the public sphere is talking.
282
Yeah, and I guess the last thing I'll say, because I know we're supposed to be short here, and it's sometimes hard for me.
283
I want to suggest that that Bill, if I may, is...
284
He's my friend, you can call him Bill.
285
Okay, okay.
286
Thanks Bill.
287
I think he's absolutely right to say that the university has to demonstrate that it is indispensable,
288
but I want to suggest that academic workers have to also demonstrate demonstrate how we can be irresistible.
289
There's a certain passion, a certain power,
290
a certain energy, a certain force that Kathy Davidson modeled for me many,
291
many moons ago now.
292
I was her student at one point.
293
And tonight, just in her comments, she reminded me by the content of them, by her manner, by her thoughtfulness,
294
of how excited and enthusiastic her modeling of an academic life,
295
the life of the mind, how inspiring it was for me.
296
And I just wanna offer that her model is something I'm always trying to pay forward
297
to my students and to the community that exceeds the campus wherever I have an opportunity to engage them.
298
So thank you, Kathy.
299
Thanks, Kathy.
300
To just say one personal comment really quick.
301
I look out and I see former students, former colleagues, current colleagues, current students, family who've come from all different parts of the United States to be here.
302
It's extremely moving and I'm gonna now stop that, because I got a show to put on.
303
Maurice, I wanted to pick up on your point about how we're part of the community.
304
And I wanna refer to a class that Bill and I co-taught in 2015 called the Future of Higher Education, where we chose 15 students.
305
They had to be in 15 disciplines from computer science to art.
306
They were all graduate students, and the other requirement is they had to that semester be teaching an undergraduate class at one of the CUNY undergraduate campuses.
307
And we would, the first day of class we walked and we said, hi, I'm Kathy Davidson, I'm Bill Kelly, we're gonna leave now, you're gonna make a class for us.
308
We're coming back in 45 minutes and you 15 people from 15 fields who have never met each other before, all graduate students are gonna design a class.
309
They were like, what?
310
We went away.
311
We came back after 45 minutes and the students were like, go away, go away.
312
We're not through yet.
313
And they had designed a class.
314
But one of the things we did is each week somebody would have some new educational experiment
315
that we would all read the theory about.
316
And that week, they would go try it out on their undergraduates and get feedback from their undergraduates.
317
We also put on an insane project at the end where every one of the undergraduates brought family
318
from all of the schools to the Graduate Center, and we had a showcase of work done by the undergraduates.
319
And a project I'll never forget, and this goes to your point, was one of our students was teaching at Brooklyn College,
320
and there was a Kehinde Wiley exhibit at the Brooklyn Museum of Art
321
and she said that she would give an A to any students
322
that could find five students of her unique students at Brooklyn
323
College find five students five people who had never been to a museum
324
and bring them to the museum Brooklyn Museum of Art let
325
everybody come in free these students put up placards all over Brooklyn in Korean,
326
in Japanese, in Mandarin, in Spanish, in Russian, and said we, these students, are going to be your docents.
327
And these students were docents for these community members who came by the hundreds.
328
And of course the most wonderful students who were there were the grannies who felt
329
so proud that their grandchildren were taking them on tours of the Brooklyn Museum of Art.
330
It was amazing and that was one of the most remarkable experiences.
331
It surely was and it goes to the point that I continue to make in these difficult times.
332
The work needs to become visible.
333
I mean we all understand the value of the work but the work needs to be visible.
334
Cathy's example is a good one.
335
There are a hundred others that I'm sure each of you can think about
336
but it's not sufficient just to do the work.
337
It's essential to also make it visible to your point about comrades.
338
Can I take that one step further?
339
I believe we have to create what I call third spaces.
340
Spaces that are not owned by us or owned by the community.
341
Spaces where we create together.
342
In Newark we created what we called Express Newark,
343
50,000 square feet in downtown Newark of a university community arts collaboratory for storytelling, for the newest Americans.
344
That kind of thing is revolutionary for getting out the word of what we really are.
345
So it's not just a sort of one and done, we have a grant, we're going in.
346
It's a constant co-creation in the community.
347
Which we have not done a terrific job in doing.
348
But universities can be anchor institutions.
349
are in and of our community if we take that seriously.
350
And we have to take it seriously.
351
This morning I got an email from the president of Princeton University, not a place noted for its history of social activism,
352
but I'm Bill by the way.
353
The subject line was stand up for Princeton and in decades I had never heard any such thing from that university.
354
And instead this was a list of representatives, of senators, of consul people.
355
This is why endowments shouldn't be taxed.
356
This is why tax exemption status should be preserved.
357
You know, bullet points very beautifully done and the argument was
358
that every week this newsletter would appear in my mailbox and you know, a very different institution than what we're talking about.
359
But the point I think is valid.
360
Constantly, not just randomly at a lecture, but constantly reminding what the value is in building this allyship that Nancy was just talking about.
361
You know, on that note, two things.
362
One, big shout out to the Graduate Center's public programs.
363
They do this all the time.
364
We do this all the time and thank you all for coming
365
and for staying on their mailing lists and for reaching out
366
and making time in your day to be part of this conversation.
367
I'll also remind you
368
that you can write your questions down on a note card as neatly as possible
369
and ushers will collect them and so you can get in on this conversation.
370
Yeah so getting back to it you know I've got this list
371
and I kind of feel like the graduate students in this room
372
and the faculty people in this room
373
or the people who are aspiring to be be faculty people in this room have a burning question about academic freedom.
374
So I'm just gonna ask it now before we get we get caught up
375
because there's all kinds of directions I could go
376
and thinking about what we're what you were saying before I love the idea of connecting with the communities
377
and and it could have pivoted this to say black and Latinx studies for instance ethnic studies,
378
women's studies, gender studies, that have a real kind of commitment to community engagement,
379
community engaged teaching and learning as part of the praxis of those.
380
And so we'll come back.
381
I'm going to circle back to that question.
382
But for now, because we still have time-ish, I wanted to ask the big question about academic freedom,
383
which has always defined higher education.
384
It is so essential to critical thinking and to the creation of new knowledges.
385
How are you thinking about academic freedom right now?
386
And what is your advice for us as we see it under threat?
387
Go ahead, President Cantor.
388
Well, we can go down the line.
389
You all don't have to answer, but- Under threat, that was the point.
390
Yes.
391
So yeah, do you have any advice for us?
392
How do we protect it?
393
How will we help it endure for the future?
394
How are you thinking about it?
395
What's your advice to the person, say, like me, who's on the schedule next semester to teach critical race theory?
396
I teach climate justice.
397
I teach all the words that are now bad words.
398
And I write all the things that, you know, as soon as my book comes out, could get banned.
399
So I want to begin and end perhaps by saying what I think it's not.
400
What I can't stand honestly is this whole notion of institutional neutrality.
401
And I think that is completely contradictory to academic freedom.
402
What is academic freedom?
403
It's our ability to have the whole diasporic world at our table.
404
It's our ability to take a critical lens to those issues.
405
We can't pretend, certainly at CUNY,
406
we can't pretend that those global issues that are resting with our homes,
407
with our students, with our communities, with our faculty and staff are things that we can be neutral about.
408
Now having said that, what I also don't like is when we jump immediately to this intellectual
409
diversity or balance so that we can't talk about,
410
we can't take a critical lens to settler colonialism
411
or apartheid or genocide because we're not bringing the balance to the table.
412
I'm just getting out there, I'll probably be fired for this, but so be it.
413
Thank you, comrade.
414
Yeah, right.
415
Comrades.
416
I don't know.
417
But I really, I mean,
418
I'll stop, but I really do feel passionately about the fact that we get drawn into this cycle of saying,
419
if we have this perspective we're analyzing, we have to have the opposite perspective for analyzing.
420
That's not the way you do interrogation of ideas.
421
You don't do that by saying, well, that could be true, but this could be true.
422
You interrogate an idea.
423
And that's what the core of academic freedom has always been about, a critical lens.
424
It's what Bilboa...I'm sorry Nancy.
425
No please, I'll be quiet.
426
Just quickly, the distinction that Nancy is
427
so correctly drawing was described again I seem to be the village Grigio recalling ancient history, but it was...
428
Better you than me.
429
Your turn next.
430
But he described that distinction as a difference between institutional neutrality and institutional restraint.
431
That the institution had an obligation to create a platform for discourse and judgment,
432
but it couldn't simply abandon its responsibility to do the kind of interrogation you're talking about.
433
I mean, we do have a responsibility to create safe spaces for that interrogation.
434
That's your job.
435
And that's really hard, and we have to face it, that that's really hard.
436
But that doesn't mean we run away from it by being neutral.
437
No, or on something like academic freedom, which is absolutely an existential issue for universities.
438
It's not simply enough to say we're providing a platform.
439
We are providing an opportunity to speak to the core values of the institution.
440
Exactly.
441
Maurice?
442
I have been thinking about this and in the context
443
of the pursuit of knowledge in black studies that I'm so much a part of these days.
444
And I was reminded, or reminded myself, that one of the most curious representations
445
or invocations of academic freedom is in Martin Luther King Jr.'s Letter from a Birmingham Jail.
446
He uses that phrase, academic freedom, And it seems almost to come from nowhere,
447
except he references academic freedom in the context of civil disobedience.
448
And he understands Socrates to have exercised civil disobedience to help realize the idea of academic freedom.
449
And so I wanna imagine that what academic freedom might look like,
450
feel like, seem like under the present circumstances is a practice of civil disobedience
451
which also means that it costs or could cost.
452
And I think if there is advice to be given it is the sobering advice that comrades know,
453
allies may not know, and that is academic freedom, the insistence upon academic freedom,
454
the practice of academic freedom may cost us something.
455
And the question is will we still stand?
456
Which is both advice and a challenge to us all I think.
457
And it's about endurance right and I'm gonna go to thank you comrade.
458
I want to ask when did we have academic freedom at its highest
459
and most open and supported era right when did we see
460
that when did we feel that when did you feel like in universities that that was supported and you could do it.
461
Right, so then I go back to something one of my colleagues says constantly, elections have consequences.
462
Right, if we really want academic freedom, if we wanna support academic freedom and the ability to really critique something and to have these open conversations,
463
what are we doing to ensure that we are making democracy front and center,
464
that we know that we are supporting voting, that we know that we are informing the public about how this plays a role,
465
how everything intertwines together.
466
I mean, Kathy and I were on the National Council for the Humanities together.
467
You know, I started under Obama, she was on already, and then she left me under Trump.
468
But we could see the shift in how you could do and fund research in universities between who's elected.
469
So we have to really ask ourselves, when does it look good and how do we ensure
470
that we kind of try to get to that point to make it look good again or make it accessible again, support it again.
471
And to just drive home the point that we've been making, and then I'm going to turn it and talk about something optimistic
472
but the negative part is when you have people denying the science of vaccines,
473
the science of epidemiology, books being banned, slavery not allowed in textbooks in many states.
474
One of our colleagues from one of the Midwestern states, I'm a Chicagoan, no slur intended here,
475
has a list of words that she can be fired for if she uses, and those words include things like social justice.
476
Woman, but not, feminist or female or woman, but not man.
477
Black in certain situations.
478
I mean, that's not, those are not neutral issues.
479
I mean, if that's not academic freedom to say there are things
480
that are true and real and important and worth fighting for, then why bother having universities?
481
Why bother having education?
482
My positive thing, and I don't know, is Leah Barlow here?
483
She was saying that she might be.
484
I don't think, I don't see her.
485
This is a woman who teaches at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical College, one of the historically black colleges and universities.
486
She taught Introduction to African American Studies in the fall to 35 students
487
and thought she'd do something cool and put her syllabus up on TikTok.
488
35 students, it was a great class.
489
She did the same thing on January 20th, 2025.
490
Martin Luther King Day, Inauguration Day.
491
She put her syllabus on, she gave a mini lecture, she left, she came back, and a million people had joined up for her class.
492
Suddenly, 18 other professors at historically black colleges said, I want to be part of this, too.
493
My class is open for free.
494
They've banned black studies at universities.
495
They're saying slavery doesn't exist in my state.
496
It does exist.
497
We're going to make this free to anybody who wants to.
498
Right now, not right now, that's the negative story.
499
4.5 million people signed up to these 18, there are advisors, there are counselors, they call themselves Hillman Talk University.
500
If anyone is old enough to remember a different world from the 80s, the Cosby kids all went to Hillman University.
501
So it's a totally made-up university that people are going to.
502
However, TikTok is proprietary in surveillance, and now they're shadow banning the professors who teach it.
503
So the numbers have gone way, way down because it's hard to even get to those.
504
But the idea that I'm trying to make is there are many ways to be resilient.
505
There are many ways to be comrades.
506
And there's many ways to say, no, no, no. We fight for truth and we fight for things that are real.
507
And we need to know those things.
508
And even if you try to take away our courses and our programs, we're going to find other ways of delivering those things.
509
And that, again, is about the public.
510
You know, to be part of Hillman Talk University, you just have to be on TikTok.
511
You don't have to have a university degree.
512
You don't have to pay tuition.
513
It's there and there are many I love it
514
that there are more and more things happening like
515
that all over the country I've heard the Columbia law Dean
516
who was fired is teaching her class on civil rights and law
517
as a free class out in parks around New York now and You know so there are ways to resist.
518
What was the word you use Shelley endure endure their ways to endure
519
And there are ways to still defend what the universities is is fighting for
520
I just kind of quickly underscore from what I hear Kathy saying is
521
that even under the constraints we are justified to lament and resist,
522
we also now have an opportunity, I think.
523
And I think what's essential for taking fullest advantage of the opportunity that we have, a kind of, you know,
524
not an opportunity we have looked for or desired, but an opportunity nonetheless, I think what might be necessary for us to do,
525
for us to take fullest advantage of it is just imagination.
526
That's what I hear Cathy talking about, a kind of institutional or institutionalized imagination
527
and understanding that perhaps
528
that might be one of our greatest forces for good in
529
this moment is the imagination to think beyond the constraints that are imposed upon us.
530
It's consistent with the history, as you know, of American public higher education in which crises were never wasted,
531
whether it was the Morrell Act during the Civil War, whether it was the challenge to Stanford University in 1900,
532
be it firing the economists who challenged Stanford's railroad policies,
533
all of these things generating other kinds of universities that Kathy has written about.
534
It has to do with the Second World War and Vannevar Bush and the NSF.
535
It has to do with the resounding response to McCarthyism.
536
These are darker times.
537
McCarthy was just a senator, not a president.
538
But in these times of crisis, as Maurice just said, resilience, endurance, and imagination come to the fore.
539
And if there is a silver lining, it is that this is an opportunity not to waste.
540
Yeah, and I do want to say quickly, Shelley, this is exactly what I said when they invited me to this panel.
541
And I was like, I'm so excited about this moment because we have the opportunity to change it.
542
And it's needed to be changed for a very long time.
543
And it's time that we speak up and we say, guess what?
544
We can do this now and let's do it, right?
545
Let's get together and let's figure this out and do it, change it.
546
Have big ideas, this is so great.
547
I'm really excited too.
548
I'm excited because one of the things that the Futures Initiative has got me about as innovation and equity,
549
advancing innovation and equity in higher ed.
550
And when we think about it in black studies, in women's studies, in gender studies, in humanities, in interdisciplinary studies,
551
we're always, and everyone in the room who's ever taught a class, right?
552
We're always thinking about the multiple ways that people learn.
553
We're always thinking about empowering and inspiring students.
554
And one of those ways of doing that is being adaptable.
555
So like Hillman talk, for instance, or the ways in which so many people are really thinking about the way
556
that they teach that centers their students and they use multiple modes, right?
557
It's not just about the textbook.
558
It's about the poem.
559
It's about the video.
560
It's about the song, the speech, the performance.
561
Then all of those things come together to connect with the community, as you were describing it first, Nancy.
562
And then when I'm thinking about black studies, connecting the communities.
563
And I say this because of course that's where I come from.
564
We have, I have the questions here, some questions from the audience.
565
And I think we have a little bit of time, so I'm gonna slip this one question in.
566
What happens when funding is tied to politics?
567
Do you think there's a way out?
568
Didn't mean to abruptly change it.
569
How about if I put this in context?
570
Of course, we're talking about this, we're talking about building, right?
571
And certainly a university like the City University of New York
572
always has to be agile because it's always dealing with a limited budget.
573
And there's a certain creativity and imagination.
574
You know, when I think about my ancestors who were slaves, enslaved, my ancestors.
575
You can see it all over my face.
576
This is the face of a person whose ancestors were enslaved.
577
And my ancestors had to imagine freedom before they could achieve it.
578
And one thing I love about the face that I carry, that I inherited from my ancestors,
579
is also to remember that we have to imagine that the impossible is possible.
580
And the only way we can achieve the impossible is with the imagination.
581
We have to think creatively, adaptively, and in a way that we see something that does not yet exist, if that makes sense to you.
582
We have to see freedom in our minds before we can imagine it in our reality, before we can create it in our reality.
583
And I think, like Shelley said, this is a moment when we make things, when we imagine and build something,
584
maybe from a ruin, maybe from an outdated system, maybe from the challenges that are in our contemporary moment.
585
We have to think big,
586
creatively with imagination and try to do something with it so that we can endure for the future.
587
Yes, go, go, go.
588
This is great.
589
And then I'm going to ask this question.
590
We also have to think collaboratively.
591
Yes.
592
Higher education has been a ridiculous competitive ecosystem.
593
Yes.
594
And that's a big problem now.
595
If funding is going to be tied to politics, we have to be tied to each other,
596
and we have to be doing things together.
597
We cannot be an isolated institution competing for that money that is tied to politics.
598
We have to have alliances, and that's what we're doing now.
599
I love it.
600
Collaboration.
601
I co-chair a national alliance of 590 presidents of universities on immigration and higher education.
602
None of us by ourselves can turn around what's happening to immigrant origin students, to international students, and to refugees.
603
We can't do it by ourselves.
604
We have to do it together.
605
And we can't be simply looking for funding from individual federal agencies that are turning us,
606
turning against it.
607
I love it.
608
Collaboration.
609
It's a model that all these people here are thinking about and one that I think is,
610
like you said, transformative, empowering, and that is going to be part of the endurances that we will need,
611
a tool for us to be able to work together and not compete, but work together.
612
That's great.
613
Thank you, Nancy.
614
You know, I think part of that collaboration, one of the things
615
that we kind of read to prepare for tonight was a message from the chancellor right
616
that was sent to everybody and and thinking about the difficulties
617
that we're facing right now particularly as higher education institutions
618
and you know he seems to take a step back
619
and he says well let's look at what our founding language
620
says right why were we created as an institution what is our mission what is our vision what is it
621
that we are trying to do
622
if you take the mission of institutions higher education institutions
623
and you really break it down a lot of them are
624
exactly the same right they're all trying to do the same thing
625
and we can come together and be collaborative
626
because we are trying to do the same things we are trying to have the same impact with the public and
627
when politics gets tied into funding get tied into accreditation into
628
what you are supposed to be doing you go back to your founding words
629
and you say no this is what we were created for
630
and this is what we are going to do
631
because this was created before you and politics came into play
632
or this came into play and we have to keep moving that forward
633
because how many institutions have changed their mission statements right you know we might update them a little bit
634
but right we stick to
635
that founding I call it our creation stories right we stick to
636
that knowledge and we move forward with
637
that Thank You Shelley some of my favorite thinkers
638
and institutional leaders and writers and dreamers always remind us that we have to believe that we can achieve the impossible.
639
And we've seen it.
640
And we're about to make history, to borrow Shelley Lowe's point.
641
We're about to use our imaginations, to borrow from your point, Maurice Wallace.
642
We're about to collaborate, to borrow from Nancy Cantor.
643
We are about to be responsive to all the ways we learn, including making collaborations.
644
Thank you, Bill.
645
Thinking about libraries and thinking about the ways that we can transform without even spending money.
646
And Kathy, thank you so much for inspiring.
647
I've worked with you you a lot in many different capacities and she always says to me your job is to inspire.
648
And so on that note I will say thank you Kathy, thank you Maurice, thank you Maurice Wallace,
649
thank you Shelley Lowe, thank you William Bill Kelly, thank you Nancy Cantor, Kathy F.
650
Davis.
651
I adore you.
652
And thank you all for coming today.
653
I hope you get home safely and that you think of yourselves as agents, historical agents, find your comrades, and let's get to work.
654
Thank you.
655
I realize I forgot to say thank you the Futures Initiative.
656
We're celebrating 10 years.
657
And there's a team that works very hard to organize this.
658
Thank you all.
Scarica l'app
Tutto ciò che serve per parlare fluentemente
Pronuncia con IAVoto per ogni frase
Pratica IPAPadroneggia ogni suono
VocabolarioCostruisci il tuo lessico
Gioco di vocabolarioImpara giocando
✨ Video consigliato
C14
243 frasi
Shashi Tharoor: Choose Purpose Over Convenience
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
208 frasi
AI & Education: Generative AI & the Future of Critical Thinking
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
![[1-3] In the Age of New technologies, Safeguarding and Transmitting Intangible Cultural Heritage](https://img.youtube.com/vi/HE2091ulFGA/mqdefault.jpg)
C12
149 frasi
[1-3] In the Age of New technologies, Safeguarding and Transmitting Intangible Cultural Heritage
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C168
16 frasi
Introducing our Levels of care quality standard
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
340 frasi
070926 BBC London, Evening News
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C12
494 frasi
Everything we learned in 29 minutes at Harvard Business School (part 1)
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B25
327 frasi
Zohran Mamdani on his first priorities as NYC mayor (Full video interview)
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C16
261 frasi
The Human Element
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C13
84 frasi
Jonny Kim | Harvard Alumni Day 2026
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B24
33 frasi
48 hours to build the future | Vietnam Today
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
51 frasi
Business Partner C1. Unit 1. Video 1.1.1.
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C115
401 frasi
Future You: Unconventional Ways in which Your Future Self Benefits You
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
Prime impressioni: perché questo video è ottimo per la pratica di conversazione in inglese
Questo video è un materiale eccellente per la pratica di conversazione in inglese e per migliorare la pronuncia inglese grazie alla sua lingua naturale, al tono formale ma accessibile e alle pause che facilitano il follow. I discorsi sono strutturati ma spontanei, simili a situazioni reali di discussione pubblica, il che lo rende perfetto per esercitarsi nella comprensione e nella ripetizione.
Analizziamo il contenuto: frasi naturali e come imitarle
Ecco tre frasi chiave e perché sono efficaci per la pratica:
- "I'm Josh Brumberg, president of the CUNY Graduate Center, and it's my pleasure to welcome you to tonight's timely discussion." La struttura semplice e le congiunzioni ("and") rendono la frase fluida. La pronuncia di "pleasure" e "timely" richiede attenzione alla "sh" e alla "y" soft, ideali per esercitare la pronuncia.
- "Higher education faces pressures few of us could have imagined even months ago." L'uso di "faces pressures" è un collocazione comune in inglese. La pausa dopo "pressures" aiuta a capire la struttura della frase, utile per il shadow speech.
- "We are proud to be one of the 25 campuses of the City University of New York, the nation's largest urban public university." La clausola aggiuntiva ("the nation's largest...") è tipica in inglese per fornire dettagli. Ripetendo questa frase, si impara a mantenere il flusso anche con informazioni aggiuntive.
Una routine di pratica: shadow speak per migliorare
Per esercitarti efficacemente, usa il metodo "shadow speech":
- Guarda il video una volta per capire il contesto.
- Ripeti ogni frase immediatamente dopo il speaker, cercando di imitare la pronuncia, l'intonazione e la velocità. Usa un registratore per confrontarti.
- Concentrati su frasi difficili (es. quelle con parole lunghe o connessioni fluide) e ripetile finché non suonano naturali.
- Fai questo esercizio per 10-15 minuti al giorno: aiuterà a migliorare la pronuncia inglese e la capacità di rispondere in tempo reale, fondamentali per la pratica di conversazione in inglese.
Il "shadowspeaks" è un modo semplice ma efficace per internalizzare la lingua: la ripetizione costante ti aiuterà a sentirti più confidente nelle conversazioni reali.
La grammatica di questo video
Le strutture che chi parla usa di più, con le parole esatte del video:
| Struttura | Nel video |
|---|---|
| Present perfect continuous have/has been + -ing — un’azione iniziata prima e ancora in corso | have been thinking · we've been making |
| Present perfect have/has + participio passato — un’azione passata che conta ancora adesso | has been · has made · have done |
| Forma passiva be + participio passato — conta ciò che accade, non chi lo fa | are honored · are embedded · be reminded |
| Frasi relative who / which + frase — un’informazione in più su una persona o una cosa | students who have · people who will · people who have |
Cos'è la tecnica dello Shadowing?
Shadowing è una tecnica di apprendimento delle lingue supportata da studi scientifici, originariamente sviluppata per la formazione dei traduttori professionisti e resa popolare dal poliglotta Dr. Alexander Arguelles. Il metodo è semplice ma potente: ascolti un audio in inglese di madrelingua e lo ripeti immediatamente ad alta voce — come un'ombra che segue il parlante con un ritardo di solo 1–2 secondi. A differenza dell'ascolto passivo o degli esercizi di grammatica, lo shadowing costringe il tuo cervello e i muscoli della bocca a elaborare e riprodurre simultaneamente i modelli di discorso reale. La ricerca dimostra che migliora significativamente la precisione della pronuncia, l'intonazione, il ritmo, il discorso connesso, la comprensione dell'ascolto e la fluidità del parlato — rendendolo uno dei metodi più efficaci per la preparazione alla prova di speaking dell'IELTS e per la comunicazione reale in inglese.