シャドーイング練習: Cillian Murphy & Brendan Gleeson - Irish interview for Perrier's Bounty - YouTubeで英語スピーキングを学ぶ
上級
シャドーイング コントロール
0% 完了 (0/46 文)
by asking what was it that attracted you to this movie per ofie um well uh it was it was the script
⏸ 一時停止中
再生速度:
リピート回数:
待機モード:
字幕同期:0ms
すべての文
46 文
1
by asking what was it that attracted you to this movie per ofie um well uh it was it was the script
0:04.96 – 0:15.48 (10.5s)
2
really it was the the the the words on the page you know uh I'd made a film that Mark Maro wrote called intermission a few years ago and uh you know I love
0:11.88 – 0:24.28 (12.4s)
3
his writing and so he talked to me about this back then and then the script arrived and I was very taken with it you know it was sort of dark and funny and
0:21.76 – 0:34.08 (12.3s)
4
weird and and um but I knew that you know he that Ian would be able to get a brilliant cast together so and it came together really really quickly in the
0:30.24 – 0:41.32 (11.1s)
5
end and yourself yeah same as that the words of the page you know they just jump out and I liked his work anyway I mean I hadn't worked with you know on on
0:39.12 – 0:51.72 (12.6s)
6
any of the macro stuff but it uh you know you just you just know when stuff is well constructed and well put together so yeah it was fun the
0:48.44 – 0:59.40 (11.0s)
7
character was kind of a blast so I said I wanted to get in touch with my psycho self again and uh so that yeah I didn't know how the time scale was going to worry
0:56.72 – 1:07.76 (11.0s)
8
out that work out that was the only problem and they worked out really well and just because you mentioned intermission there obviously there's been a lot of films recently in in Ireland that have concentrated in duin
1:06.40 – 1:18.60 (12.2s)
9
and the urban space that is is duin um kisses for example and intermission and films like that what is it that you think that makes duin work as a kind of urban space on
1:15.96 – 1:29.40 (13.4s)
10
film well uh I think you know you know it's the the movement has been um for cities to get bigger and bigger and bigger so like Millions upon
1:25.72 – 1:36.56 (10.8s)
11
Millions upon millions of people are living in cities and so therefore you're talking it is the universal language before I think even you know the rural the rural was what might have been
1:35.40 – 1:46.68 (11.3s)
12
called the ordinary I think now Suburbia is the norm and it's something that's been happening in film and in plays I remember doing with the passion machine like Paul Mercer and Rod doy and people
1:44.56 – 1:56.60 (12.0s)
13
like that he was concentrating on the Suburban reality that was neither the you know cosm City Center or out in the
1:54.20 – 2:04.28 (10.1s)
14
mushy luscious green kind of you know Hills of wherever uh so I think I think it's not just um Dublin in fact a lot of
2:02.16 – 2:13.60 (11.4s)
15
this movie was shot in London um but I think that sort of area that's that's just in where most people actually lives and then you go down the back
2:09.92 – 2:22.00 (12.1s)
16
Lanes where not everybody chooses to go at night H and you have a very interesting kind of a uh gloomy slightly dangerous place and this is your fourth
2:19.56 – 2:30.64 (11.1s)
17
or fifth film working together I think at this stage you obviously had 28 Days Later and breakfast and Pluto um does it get easier working together or how does
2:28.88 – 2:41.00 (12.1s)
18
it different Jee I mean it just seems to get worse every time it does yeah just it's got to be the last time you know I know at least the time before like brex
2:38.32 – 2:49.80 (11.5s)
19
and Pluto I was kind of in a very large suit I actually didn't have to look at him very much I know it's been great and hopefully we'll do it again you know
2:48.12 – 2:59.52 (11.4s)
20
very soon um so no it was great and actually just working with the whole clatter of them in this film you know conningham and all the rest of them um
2:56.40 – 3:06.48 (10.1s)
21
you just kind of felt it's the kind of stuff I want to do that's basically with Jim how was that great uh he's well I'd worked him before very briefly but we didn't have much to
3:05.08 – 3:16.20 (11.1s)
22
get on screen and gang's New York and he's he's just superb he's got um you know fantastic comic timing we're just talking about it earlier but it's also
3:14.36 – 3:25.60 (11.2s)
23
he's got a kind of a Humanity he just appears and immediately your heart is broken for him for some reason uh he just has he just communicates um such
3:23.80 – 3:34.52 (10.7s)
24
Humanity I think people appetize him immedately you have tips from him for the the Irish accent that he was coming up Killian told him that nobody talks like
3:32.60 – 3:45.00 (12.4s)
25
that nobody uses those words really do it's quite heightened um but I know it's a beautiful performance he gives in it you
3:41.08 – 3:52.16 (11.1s)
26
know and as brenon says you can't help but just adore him even though my character is intensely irritated by him but yet you can see that there's a there's a love there between the two of
3:50.32 – 4:00.64 (10.3s)
27
them and that's another great thing about the film like IT addresses that father son that complex relationship to Father and Sons have uh particularly this one where it's being aranged and
3:59.44 – 4:11.60 (12.2s)
28
kind of fractured and then they you know he it reconciles and resolves towards the end of the film in in a in a nice
4:08.72 – 4:19.44 (10.7s)
29
sad way and just to talk about someone else that was on screen with you a lot the dogs how was that like you have to be an animal lover obviously to deal with them I think you should really ask
4:17.04 – 4:29.04 (12.0s)
30
the dogs it's the dogs I felt sorry for they were great they were great they were very good they got knackered at about 3:00 in the morning that was the only problem with them just on to liay
4:25.68 – 4:37.64 (12.0s)
31
down and had enough of show Showbiz but um no they were brilliant they were great great Savages yeah and um you yourself you've had right year you've
4:35.28 – 4:45.76 (10.5s)
32
had the ammy win obviously and then the nomination for um secret life Cals was that a surprise to you at all or were you very happy with that uh I was very
4:43.52 – 4:55.20 (11.7s)
33
surprised about um I was very surprised when I heard the secret of KS um because not because I was surprised because the nature of the work the quality of the
4:52.88 – 5:03.60 (10.7s)
34
work is such that uh of course I didn't but I it was one of those I completely lost sight of it I wasn't even thinking about it the next thing I got this text and I was absolutely over the moon about
5:01.36 – 5:11.88 (10.5s)
35
that I have to say um and I think it just shows you like it gets such bad press you know and all the rest of it um the Oscars and there so much you know schmalz and rubbish and politics and
5:09.64 – 5:21.16 (11.5s)
36
everything that people talk about but actually you know over there there is a real kind of conscientious search for for good stuff and the fact that they found it and that they brought it in
5:19.44 – 5:30.48 (11.0s)
37
mean to get in Academy Award a nomination in animation which is so labor intensive so expensive and needs such kind of ambition to make happen uh
5:28.96 – 5:39.60 (10.6s)
38
I just thought it was absolutely brilliant achievement I can't really proud of them and really and really proud of the whole the fact that the academy went and saw it and took it and
5:38.12 – 5:48.40 (10.3s)
39
brought it over there and showcased it you know so yeah it's been a great year that way and next up is your directorial debut I believe hope so yeah hope so that coming along now it's I'm trying if
5:46.68 – 5:57.48 (10.8s)
40
I can lose Killian out of the film I think we might we might have a chance of making it yeah you've got a big cast for that and who else is yeah it is well I mean col and TL and Gabriel burn and a
5:56.12 – 6:07.64 (11.5s)
41
whole crowd of people like Damon Mor's and all that we did a table reading about three years ago um it's that long ago now when we're just trying to you know developing the script and there
6:05.36 – 6:16.76 (11.4s)
42
were four generations of Irish actors at the table and it was one of the best days I ever spent quite nerve-wracking up to a point but then fantastically enjoyable so uh if we can get that
6:15.00 – 6:26.16 (11.2s)
43
actually working on a SAT I'd be I'd be over the moon and Kaden what's next for you uh I have film called Inception it
6:23.76 – 6:33.84 (10.1s)
44
comes out in July um so and uh just kind of reading stuff now and seeing what what lies around the corner really can you give us any spoilers about inception
6:30.60 – 6:41.92 (11.3s)
45
no I I couldn't possibly no it's worth it'll be worth the wait I think and it'll be worth not really knowing I think uh because it should be should be
6:39.52 – 6:50.24 (10.7s)
46
quite special I hope anyway perfect okay that's everything I have for you guys thanks cheers
6:47.52 – 6:55.04 (7.5s)
このレッスンについて
このYouTube動画では、アイルランド出身の人気俳優、キリアン・マーフィーとブレンダン・グリーソンが、映画「Perrier's Bounty」について語るインタビューをご覧いただけます。彼らは脚本の魅力、共演者とのユニークな関係、ダブリンでの撮影経験、そしてアワード受賞の喜びや今後のプロジェクトまで、幅広いトピックにわたって軽快なトークを繰り広げます。
この動画は、ネイティブスピーカー間の自然な会話のペースやイントネーション、そして特にアイルランド英語のアクセントに触れる絶好の機会を提供します。映画製作の裏話や個人的な感想を述べる表現を学び、彼らのユーモアあふれるやり取りを通して、日常英会話や意見表明の英語スピーキング練習に役立てることができるでしょう。
重要な語彙とフレーズ
-
taken with it: 魅了される、心を奪われる。
例: "I was very taken with it." (それにとても心を奪われました。) -
a blast: とても楽しい経験、素晴らしい時間。
例: "The character was kind of a blast." (その役柄はかなり楽しかったです。) -
work out: うまくいく、解決する。
例: "I didn't know how the time scale was going to work out." (時間配分がどうなるか分かりませんでした。) -
comic timing: 絶妙な間の取り方、コメディの才能。
例: "He's got fantastic comic timing." (彼は素晴らしいコメディの才能を持っています。) -
can't help but adore him: 彼を愛さずにはいられない。
例: "You can't help but just adore him." (彼を愛さずにはいられません。) -
over the moon: 大喜びで、狂喜して。
例: "I was absolutely over the moon about that." (それに本当に大喜びしました。) -
lose sight of it: 見失う、忘れてしまう。
例: "I completely lost sight of it." (完全に忘れていました。) -
nerve-wracking: 非常に緊張する、ハラハラさせる。
例: "Quite nerve-wracking up to a point." (ある程度までは非常に緊張しました。)
この動画の練習のコツ
シャドーイングと発音練習
この動画は、シャドーイングと発音練習に最適な素材です。特に、アイルランド英語の独特のアクセントとリズムを習得したい学習者にとって、彼らの自然な話し方は貴重な教材となるでしょう。
- 話速とリズム: 二人の俳優は、日常会話に即した自然な速度で話しています。まず動画全体を聞いて、彼らの会話のリズムやポーズの取り方を感じ取りましょう。
-
アイルランド英語のアクセント:
- 「R」の音: アイルランド英語はしばしば非R音性（non-rhotic）であり、単語の語尾や子音の前にある「r」の音が発音されないことがあります。例えば "forever" の「-er」の音に注意して聞いてみてください。
- 母音の発音: "i" の音が「アイ」に近い音になったり、"ou" が特定の状況で異なる響きになったりすることがあります。彼らの発音を注意深く模倣することで、よりリアルな発音練習ができます。
- 感情と表現の模倣: 彼らはユーモラスで感情豊かな話し方をします。「over the moon」のような感情を表すフレーズをシャドーイングする際は、彼らの声のトーンや表情も真似るように意識すると、より自然な英語の流暢さにつながります。
- トピックの難易度: 映画や個人的な経験に関する話題は、比較的親しみやすく、日常会話で役立つ表現が豊富です。これらの表現を自分の言葉で話せるようになることで、IELTS対策のスピーキングセクションでの意見表明能力向上にも繋がります。
繰り返し練習することで、聞き取り能力とスピーキング能力の両方を効果的に向上させ、より自信を持って英語を話せるようになるでしょう。
シャドーイングとは？英語上達に効果的な理由
シャドーイング（Shadowing）は、もともとプロの通訳者養成プログラムで開発された言語学習法で、多言語習得者として知られるDr. Alexander Arguelles によって広く普及されました。方法はシンプルですが非常に効果的：ネイティブスピーカーの英語を聞きながら、1〜2秒の遅延で声に出してすぐに繰り返す——まるで「影（shadow）」のように話者を追いかけます。文法ドリルや受動的なリスニングと異なり、シャドーイングは脳と口の筋肉が同時にリアルタイムで英語を処理・再現することを強制します。研究により、発音精度、抑揚、リズム、連音、リスニング力、そして会話の流暢さが大幅に向上することが確認されています。IELTSスピーキング対策や自然な英語コミュニケーションを目指す方に特におすすめです。
ShadowingEnglishでの効果的な学習方法
- 動画を選ぶ: 自然で明瞭な英語が使われているYouTube動画を選びましょう。TED Talks、BBC News、映画のシーン、ポッドキャスト、IELTS模範解答などが最適です。URLをコピーして検索バーに貼り付けてください。短い動画（5分以内）や、自分が本当に興味を持てるテーマから始めるのがコツです。
- まず聞いて内容を理解する: 最初は1倍速でただ聞くだけにしましょう。まだ繰り返す必要はありません。文の意味を理解し、話者がどのように単語を強調し、音を繋げ、間を取っているかに注目してください。内容を把握してからシャドーイングに入ると、はるかに効果的です。
- シャドーイングモードを設定する:
- Wait Mode（待機モード）:
+3sまたは+5sを選ぶと、動画が一文を読み終えた後に自動で一時停止し、繰り返す時間が生まれます。完全に手動でコントロールしたい場合はManualを選んでNextを自分で押しましょう。 - Sub Sync（字幕同期）: YouTubeの字幕と音声がずれることがあります。
±100msで調整して、正確なタイミングで追えるようにしてください。
- Wait Mode（待機モード）:
- 声に出してシャドーイングする（最重要）: ここが練習の本質です。文が流れると同時に——または一時停止中に——はっきりと自信を持って声に出して繰り返しましょう。ただ単語を読むだけでなく、話者のリズム、強調、高低、連音をそっくりそのまま真似することが大切です。「影」のように話者に重なるのが理想。Repeat機能を使って同じ文を何度も繰り返し、自然に出てくるまで定着させましょう。
- 徐々に難易度を上げて続ける: 一つのパッセージに慣れたら、さらに挑戦してみましょう。速度を <code>1.25x</code> や <code>1.5x</code> に上げれば、高速の言語反射を鍛えられます。Wait Modeを <code>Off</code> にして連続シャドーイングするのが最も上級で効果的なモードです。毎日15〜30分継続すれば、数週間で目に見える変化を実感できます。