シャドーイング練習: He’s always wrong - 動画で英語スピーキングを学ぶ
レッスンを作成中...
1
All right?
2
We're going to do this again.
3
I hope you're ready for this, okay?
4
Because since June 12th, we've been working closely with the U .S government to restore access to Claude Mythos 5
5
and Fable 5.
6
I can't believe Anthropic lost it.
7
I wonder, I wonder what caused that.
8
Today, the government has notified us that Mythos 5, our strongest cybersecurity model, can be redeployed to a set of U .S organizations that operate and defend critical infrastructure.
9
Now you're probably thinking, well, wait a second organizations that do critical infrastructure.
10
Haven't we seen this before?
11
Wasn't there something about mythos and only going out to select organizations?
12
Yes, there was.
13
It was called Project Glasswing.
14
This was just a couple months ago when Anthropics said mythos was in fact too dangerous.
15
And then they released it to everybody.
16
And then they pulled it back because the US government was told how dangerous it was.
17
Well, we're just replaying this entire record again.
18
We're back to Project Glasswing.
19
There is the set of the good guys, which apparently is
20
they get access again
21
and the rest of us we don't get access now i'm going to talk a lot about safety okay
22
because here's the deal i think this is all fake i
23
think not only is it fake i think it's actually hurting
24
people i actually have the opposite opinion of dario surprise surprise
25
me with the opposite opinion me with the opposite opinion of
26
this guy right here okay we don't actually see eye to
27
eye by the way this is dario in 2023 oh we're gonna play this clip of him up.
28
Of course, before we begin, I'd like to say thank you to the sponsors.
29
One of the more terrifying things you can do as a company is to contract out software.
30
And I know a lot of companies are contracting out their mobile applications.
31
The thing that makes this so dangerous is that it's a black box experience.
32
You hope you get back software that is complete, that is going to be well tested, that ultimately will be extensible as future needs require.
33
The last thing I wanted someone else to say to Claude, hey, mobile app, no mistakes.
34
It does make mistakes.
35
This is why I trust the guys over at Infinite Red.
36
I have had many a long talks with the CEO about software quality
37
and the way to really build robust and good systems.
38
And I love everything he has to say.
39
And everything that I have seen with my own eyes, quality of software that they build is very, very good.
40
All right, so the safety argument is actually pretty dang ridiculous that we're having right now, this whole kind of gated access to Claude mythos.
41
But I just wanted to kind of add one more quick point.
42
If you don't know, right now, chat GPT 5 .6 is also in a limited preview.
43
And the reason being, for now, at the request of the US government,
44
we're starting with a limited preview among a small group of trusted partners that's also too dangerous.
45
He's not allowed to release it either.
46
We got to make sure we slowly roll the thing out.
47
And we're entering into an era in
48
which the government is now going to have a larger and larger impact into what is exactly happening.
49
And this was always Dario's goal.
50
His goal was always to have the government step in and make regulation.
51
He's been just saying this nonstop.
52
If you read his writings, if you listen to his talks,
53
and his urging that we all has been realized the Frontier Studios are all being slowed down,
54
but that's not really actually making anything safer.
55
Because here's the deal.
56
Have you heard of the old model GLM?
57
Well, GLM 5 .2 apparently beats Claude in some cybersecurity benchmarks.
58
At least in this article, the security that's being ran is insecure direct object reference.
59
If you don't know what that is, that's simply, let's just pretend you have an endpoint on your website that goes and grabs user information.
60
If I were to pass in any user ID, you should probably go, hey, are you that user?
61
Oh, you're not?
62
Hey, you're not allowed to look at, I'm sorry.
63
Hey, brother, sorry, this is not you.
64
404, don't know who this is.
65
out that the fourth most common bug on hacker one top vulnerability list is in fact,
66
these right here these oopsie poopsies insecure direct object references where people can just go onto websites
67
and get data if they just simply have an ID.
68
So Semgrep went off and developed a benchmark against these type of vulnerabilities.
69
And it turns out things like Claude code Opus 46 and 48 did about a 28 % to 37%.
70
Jippity codex at about a 20 %
71
itself did all 39 % did better than both Claude Code and their latest models and Gipity 5 .5.
72
Now
73
if you don't know a harness makes a big difference a
74
harness is a lot of the reasons why you think coding with an LLM has gotten
75
so good it's actually the harness the ability for the model to use
76
and abuse the system to gather information
77
and make smarter decisions a harness is going to be the thing
78
that gives the model access to tools in which it can then go and make much more informed decisions so
79
with no harness outperformed Opus 4 .8 by practically 10%, Jippity 5 .5 by practically 20%.
80
And those both have harnesses.
81
And the thing about GLM that you may not realize is that it's an open weight model.
82
I can go to Hugging Face right now and download the model.
83
The thing is, it's very, very large for me to be able to run it with any level of effectiveness, it could cost me about $73 an hour.
84
Now, if I was a lot more than $73 an hour by scamming people.
85
And of course, it would be a completely offline model for me to just have, I wouldn't have to go
86
and fork over millions of dollars to be able to have an on premise machine that could run this instead, I could just run it from the safety of my computer, just doing a quick little SSH up,
87
bada bing, bada boom, and just see the thing run.
88
Not only that, but Hermes agents, one of these many agents, one of these many harnesses that run models has something called a mixture of agents, meaning it uses both 55 from Jippity,
89
and also uses 40 is four eight.
90
And by combining those both, it's doing better on benchmarks.
91
In other words, it's performing better.
92
I don't really like honestly, when someone says it's 11 % better, I have no idea what that actually means, because I don't know how to quantify.
93
programming in
94
that kind of sense i don't know how to be like it's four percent better like i don't know what
95
that means But it's just saying, hey, it's scoring higher on whatever these tests are, which once again means that the ability to do,
96
you know, security research and all this is actually kind of generally available.
97
The bugs that Mythos has found, people are able to find them also with 4 .8.
98
You're going to be able to find them with the mixture of agents.
99
GLM is going to be able to go off and find these as well.
100
As harnesses improve, the ability to do this is going to go way up.
101
higher than Mythos.
102
So it's all actually available.
103
It's just available to those with money.
104
If you have money and time, and you can set up your own harness, bada bing, bada boom, you're going to have yourself a hacking machine,
105
which is ultimately what Dario has been warning everybody about.
106
The scaling of open source models, I think it's going down a very dangerous path.
107
And if again, if the path continues, I think we could get to a very dangerous place.
108
Yikes.
109
I think it's worth saying some things on open source models that are clear to all the experts, but I want to make sure is understood by this.
110
Clear to all the experts.
111
They uniformly agree, which is crazy because, you know, classic experts.
112
I mean, you can't even get dentists to agree on the toothpaste, and he's over here getting...
113
experts to agree to outcomes of stuff we haven't measured yet?
114
Kind of wild.
115
Committee, which is when you control a model and you're deploying it, you have the ability to monitor its usage.
116
It's really all you need to know.
117
You'd like to monitor the usage.
118
And this is the whole argument.
119
This is the entire safety argument, which is just completely broken.
120
There's open source models in which are doing absolutely excellent.
121
There's people that have money and motivation to scam.
122
They have access to it.
123
There's a whole bunch of people that maintain don't have access to these models.
124
They don't have access to these open source frameworks, because they're not going to go spend, you know, $5 ,000 over a weekend to maintain their little open source project
125
that nobody actually cares about in which the entire world uses
126
and everybody actually cares about they just don't realize they care about it.
127
And this is the whole problem of the safety argument is that it's fundamentally unsafe, the tools and the harnesses are there.
128
people talking about it all the time on the internet.
129
There's already better harnesses that are scoring higher, whatever that means, on the same benchmarks than Mythos.
130
At the end of the day, I think Michael, creator of Effects TS, says it best.
131
Gonna need to get something off my chest.
132
The Discord on CyberSec and Mythos slash US approach is stupid beyond imagination.
133
There should be no guardrails, and the most powerful model should be immediately available to everyone.
134
Want to make sure the world is safer?
135
Give free usage to maintainers of core infrastructure.
136
If access is restricted, be sure offensive teams will find their way in.
137
Somebody with insider access to Anthropic
138
or OpenAI will be offered a deal they can't refuse and leak the model to malicious actors, or a malicious actor will end up developing an equally capable model.
139
Look at GLM.
140
It's near the same level of capability.
141
Yeah, maybe it's not mythos levels, but it's not far off.
142
Yes, not only the good folks have money, but also the bad ones.
143
Exactly correct.
144
The only thing you achieve by restricting access is unsafety.
145
100%.
146
Because that's the thing is right now, you could have an entire world that exists in which people could be preparing their piece of the world,
147
their little corner of software, making it more secure if that's the true delivery of these models to begin with.
148
If that's the case, wouldn't you want the whole world to walk in lockstep?
149
Why would you want a select group of bad guys who happen to have a couple million
150
or the ability to rent out enough Blackwell Ultra
151
Nvidia to be able to take advantage of everybody else
152
while we the plebs wait for the ability to secure our own systems.
153
Like the fundamental premise of this all doesn't make any sense.
154
Like if Dario actually wanted safety, he would go for Federation.
155
It's the only way to make the world safe is to
156
have a lot of people work on it at the same time.
157
The only way to make it unsafe is to allow people to lag far behind what the bad guys have access to.
158
Ridiculous.
159
Absolutely ridiculous.
160
And that's because at the end of the day, anthropic Dario over here what they really want is control he says it right there inside the little interview
161
If I can just control the inputs, well then I can control the outputs.
162
If I don't let you say certain things, well then you can't say it to the model.
163
I can protect you from you and ultimately that's why i call him daddy dario
164
He is the one that's going to keep you safe from all the bad guys or good guys.
165
But you're going to be safe because, honestly, he has your best interest in heart, which is just control.
166
I mean, sorry, safety, safety.
167
He has your best interest in heart.
168
It's safety.
169
That's what he wants.
170
Anyway, so there you go.
171
That's my whole opinion on safety in this entire talk.
172
I think it's all ridiculous.
173
I think this entire gated access and everything is really not doing anything good.
174
I think at the end of the day, the bad actors are still going to be bad.
175
been cited a hundred times all over these different studies it's not like we're actually really having security
176
or just having security theater.
177
And ultimately, it's a play for control.
178
Or it's a play for Dario to be able to regulate his opponents out of business.
179
I'm not actually really sure which one it is.
180
Probably both is my guess.
181
Anyways, I can't wait for Fable to come back out again.
182
That would be great, huh?
183
I'd love to have a little bit of Fable.
184
Wouldn't you?
185
Yeah, that'd be fantastic.
186
I'd use it again.
187
Yeah, Fable?
188
I would.
189
The name.
190
This is the Primogen.
📺 同じチャンネル
B21
You won't fall behind
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
Go’s Big Mistake
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B23
People Are Mad They're Told to Learn
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B22
Maybe we were wrong
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C27
Github are you joking?
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
✨ おすすめ動画
B21
33 文
THEY'RE HIDING THE TRUTH ABOUT AI
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B21
349 文
THE DISCLAIMER: Let It Breathe
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B22
105 文
Gilfoyle Hacks Jian Yang's Smart Fridge 🤓 Silicon Valley
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B21
567 文
I Cheated Until the Casino Banned Me
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B11
208 文
EnglishPod (B0007)
Business EnglishDaily ConversationHigh School Students
B22
194 文
『プラダを着た悪魔２』無料プレビュー
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B21
205 文
The Man Who Stole MySpace | Samy
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B2194
22 文
Quick English Shadowing Practice
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B22
775 文
117. Coldplay Cheating Scandal, Proposal Gone Wrong, + LIB Season 9 Announcement
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B22
142 文
The Internet Didn't Fail. It Was Taken.
American AccentBusiness EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B21
69 文
7 Programming myths that waste your time
American AccentBusiness EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B2266 文
Computer Repair Shop Workers Confess Their SINS
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
この動画で話す練習をする理由
この動画では、特定の場面における話し方や表現方法について学ぶことができます。話す練習をすることで、自分の意見を主張したり、他人とコミュニケーションを取る際の自信が得られます。また、アメリカ政府に関わる安全性や技術の課題についての対話は、実際の会話で役立つテーマです。特に、関係者同士の意見の相違が描かれているため、異なる視点を理解し、表現する力を養う絶好の機会です。この動画は、shadowspeakやshadow speechを用いる練習に最適です。
文法と文脈における表現
この動画では、以下の重要な文法構造や表現が使用されています:
- 現在完了形: 「we've been working closely」と述べることで、過去から現在までの継続的な行動を強調しています。
- 仮定法: 「we're just replaying this entire record again」といった表現は、状況が繰り返されることを示し、仮定的なニュアンスを持っています。
- 対比構造: 「the good guys」と「the rest of us」との対比は、意見の対立を強調する効果があります。
- 疑問文:「Haven't we seen this before?」のような疑問文は、聴衆に考えさせる役割を果たしています。
これらの文法ポイントを実際の会話で使うことで、自分の表現力を向上させることができます。
一般的な発音の罠
動画の中には発音に関して注意が必要な言葉があります。以下にいくつかの例を挙げます:
- “critical infrastructure”: 連結音が強調されるため、スムーズに発音することが重要です。
- “contract out”: 速いスピードで話すと特に聞き取難くなる可能性があるため、ゆっくり練習することをおすすめします。
- “black box”: このフレーズは発音が難しくないですが、文脈によっては特に重要な意味を持つため、強調して復唱する練習をしてみましょう。
これらの音に注意を払い、反復することで、英語の発音力を向上させることができます。
この動画の文法
話し手がよく使っている文型を、動画の実際の表現とともに紹介します。
| 文型 | 動画での表現 |
|---|---|
| 条件文 if + 節, will/would + 動詞 — 条件とその結果 | If that's the case, wouldn't you · if Dario actually wanted safety, he would go |
| 現在完了進行形 have/has been + -ing — 以前に始まり今も続いている動作 | we've been working · has been warning |
| 受動態 be + 過去分詞 — 誰がするかより、何が起きるかに焦点を当てる | can be redeployed · was called · was told |
| 現在完了形 have/has + 過去分詞 — 過去の出来事が今も関係している | has notified · have seen · has been realized |
シャドーイングとは？英語上達に効果的な理由
シャドーイング（Shadowing）は、もともとプロの通訳者養成プログラムで開発された言語学習法で、多言語習得者として知られるDr. Alexander Arguelles によって広く普及されました。方法はシンプルですが非常に効果的：ネイティブスピーカーの英語を聞きながら、1〜2秒の遅延で声に出してすぐに繰り返す——まるで「影（shadow）」のように話者を追いかけます。文法ドリルや受動的なリスニングと異なり、シャドーイングは脳と口の筋肉が同時にリアルタイムで英語を処理・再現することを強制します。研究により、発音精度、抑揚、リズム、連音、リスニング力、そして会話の流暢さが大幅に向上することが確認されています。IELTSスピーキング対策や自然な英語コミュニケーションを目指す方に特におすすめです。