쉐도잉 연습: Creating Capabilities – Martha Nussbaum - 영상으로 영어 말하기 배우기

레슨 만드는 중...
1
Well, of course, GDP has been used for many years as a measure of quality of life.
2
But what we want, if we're measuring quality of life, is we want to know how people are really doing.
3
And for several reasons, GDP really doesn't get at that.
4
First of all, it doesn't take account of distribution.
5
So it can give very, it's an average, so it can give very high marks to nations
6
that have huge and alarming inequalities where the people at the top may be doing very well, so the average is high,
7
but then a lot of people at the bottom are living very miserable lives.
8
Second, because it funnels all parts of human life together in a single number,
9
it doesn't really tell you how people are doing in separate areas of life that you really want to care about,
10
such as health, education, political liberty, race relations.
11
So there's so many things that bear on the quality of a human life.
12
You might argue that GDP is a good proxy for all of them
13
and that if you just simply push for economic growth, it'll trickle down and improve these other things, but actually that's not true.
14
Empirical research by now has shown that health and education are not very robustly correlated with increased GDP.
15
In the different Indian states, health and education are subjects that are left for the states to manage.
16
So you can use them as experimental laboratories
17
and it's really quite interesting to see that some
18
that have shot for increased GDP and have achieved that have very poor achievements in health and education.
19
While Kerala, which is a relatively poor state whose economy has not grown well,
20
actually has 99% adolescent literacy in both males and females and health achievements that are comparable to inner-city New York,
21
which is I think shameful for New York, but it's actually quite fine for a poor Indian state.
22
But then if you think about political liberty, gender relations, race relations, it's even more obvious that that's not highly correlated with GDP.
23
I mean, everyone admires China for the stunning economic growth, but we know very well that there are lots of things that are lacking there.
24
Well, the first time that the United Nations published a human development report using this approach.
25
The great Pakistani economist, Mahbub ul Haq, said the real wealth of the nation is its people
26
and the purpose of development is to create an enabling environment for people to live long, healthy and creative lives.
27
So that's the purpose of the approach.
28
So essentially it asks the very basic question, what are people actually able to do
29
and to be in a wide range of areas
30
which are thought to be of central importance for the quality of a human life.
31
Now I've actually made a list of 10
32
because I'm interested in constitutional law and so I'm interested in the way
33
that you could actually write this down and put it into constitutional documents.
34
But other people don't make a list
35
but they pick out certain things to compare and then you have to figure out how to measure each of them.
36
So what would be a good proxy for education and
37
so of course data have to be reshaped to the new approach
38
and I think right now the Human Development Reports use mean years of schooling as a proxy for education, and that's because they can get data on that.
39
It's much harder to get inside the school and figure out exactly what people are able to do.
40
So I think we always need to be pushing for better measures.
41
It's again very hard to know what you should be looking at when you measure health.
42
Health opportunities is what you really want to look at, not health achievements, because we do think that people should have choices about how to live their lives.
43
And so what's important is that they should have opportunities to have good health, and then some may choose to live an unhealthy life.
44
But there's a huge difference between fasting and starving, you know.
45
And if people are fasting for reasons of their own choice, that's one thing.
46
But if they are malnourished and they're starving, that's another.
47
So it's very hard to know how to measure that.
48
And of course, one of the things you just do is look at the incidence of different kinds of diseases, nutritional diseases, then you look at longevity,
49
which of course is a very good proxy for health opportunities.
50
What are the books of human vulnerability?
51
Those books are about how political arrangements can address problems of human vulnerability.
52
And prior to that, we have to ask what forms of vulnerability should be addressed.
53
Some forms of vulnerability, such as being open to love
54
or caring about your children we don't want to remove from human life
55
but we do want to support them
56
and make them fruitful rather than sources of just constant daily agonizing uncertainty you know
57
so if you think about my work on the emotions it's all really about love
58
and it's about attachments that people have and i'm certainly trying to send the message that people should not shrink from attachments.
59
But then, you know, it's just not the case
60
that we want people to be as vulnerable as possible when they have children and they love them.
61
No, you know, how would a decent society support
62
that relationship of love and attachment and make it not the case that you have to worry from day to day, are my children going to get their food or not?
63
And so, yeah, thinking about how vulnerability plays out
64
and how good governments can leave room for the good kinds of vulnerability where you're open to loving somebody,
65
but get rid of the bad sorts where you're afraid
66
that you're going to be beaten up if you walk outside your house or you're afraid that your children might starve.
67
I guess the first thing to say is it's a persuasive document.
68
It's not meant to be imposed by force of arms or even by economic threats.
69
And actually I think those things are almost never justified.
70
I do think that when you're thinking about what you want to fund, if you're a nation in the developed world,
71
it might make sense to give priority to things like health and education.
72
But most of the time, I mean, I'm really a big supporter of national sovereignty.
73
I think you should do it by giving it to the nation and let them decide what to do with it.
74
So it's a template for nations to consult when they think what they might want to protect.
75
And I have some arguments, which I think are good arguments, that these are things that they should pay attention to.
76
So we hope that people will be persuaded.
77
But it's certainly, I think it's not imperialism if you try to persuade people of something.
78
So that's the first thing to say.
79
Second thing is that it's, unless you defend certain things, you don't have meaningful pluralism.
80
For example, the freedom of speech, the freedom of association, the freedom of religion.
81
Unless you give those a very strong place in your nation, in your constitution, or whatever you have as your founding document,
82
then it's very hard for meaningful pluralism to even exist.
83
So the relationship between universalism and pluralism is complicated.
84
And you have to say, this we defend for everyone, if you're going to have the difference in the plurality that really I think we all want to see.
85
The third thing is that this is a list of capabilities, and it's not a list of functionings.
86
It's not meant to dragoon people into pursuing one of these.
87
It's a set of opportunities.
88
So you might hate religion
89
and still think it's a fine thing to protect the freedom of religion
90
so that the people who do care about religion can use it when they want to use it.
91
Similarly, you know, many of us love to work.
92
We work a lot.
93
But we still think that there should be maximum hours protections and that people shouldn't have to work all the time.
94
They shouldn't, lives should not be swallowed up by that, so that if they want leisure time, they should be able to have it.
95
You know, again, some people may want to engage in fasting for religious reasons or personal reasons,
96
but what's important is they should have the opportunity to be well-nourished.
97
So I think that's a very permissive approach.
98
It's an approach that really is all about opportunity and choice.
99
So the last thing I'll say is that because I'm thinking so much about constitutional law,
100
I think that what I put on my list is something extremely abstract in general with the idea
101
that each nation will do it somewhat differently and
102
that they'll take some abstract thing like the freedom of speech
103
and then they'll think what version of that they want to endorse.
104
As we know, different nations around the world have very different doctrines of free speech
105
and the doctrine of free speech in the US is extremely speech protective,
106
for example defending anti-Semitic protesting and marching in Skokie, whereas in Germany anti-Semitic speech is illegal.
107
Well, I actually think both are right, given their different histories and traditions.
108
So the whole point of the list is to say, well here's kind of a general idea, now you think what you want to do with that in keeping with your history and traditions.
109
Thank you.

이 비디오로 스피킹 연습을 하는 이유

유튜브 영어 공부에서 스피킹 실력을 키우고 싶다면 이 비디오가 딱입니다! 마사 누스바움의 발표는 논리적이고 깊이 있는 내용을 담고 있어, IELTS 스피킹과 같은 고급 시험 준비에 필요한 복잡한 주제를 다루는 능력을 기르기에 좋습니다. 특히 "인간 개발"과 "국가 정책" 같은 주제는 실생활에서도 자주 다루는 내용이어서, shadowing site나 shadowspeak을 이용해 발음과 리듬을 연습하면 자연스러운 영어 표현력을 키울 수 있습니다. 생각을 정리하고 논리적으로 전달하는 연습도 동시에 할 수 있어, 스피킹 실력이 한층 업그레이드됩니다!

문맥 속 문법과 표현

이 비디오에서 자주 사용되는 핵심 표현을 알아봅시다:

  • "It doesn't take account of..." - "~를 고려하지 않는다"는 뜻으로, 논평에서 자주 사용됩니다. 예: "GDP는 불평등을 고려하지 않는다"고 말할 때 쓸 수 있습니다.
  • "correlated with..." - "~와 상관관계가 있다"는 뜻으로, 통계적 관계를 설명할 때 유용합니다. IELTS 스피킹에서 데이터를 분석할 때 자주 쓸 수 있습니다.
  • "leave room for..." - "~를 위한 공간을 남기다"는 뜻으로, 정책이나 계획을 논할 때 유용합니다. 예: "정부는 개인의 선택을 위한 공간을 남겨야 한다"고 표현할 수 있습니다.

발음의 함정

이 비디오에서 발음이 어려울 수 있는 단어들을 주의하세요:

  • "capabilities" - /ˌkeɪpəˈbɪlətiz/로 발음하며, 마지막 "ties" 부분이 약하게 들립니다. shadow speak 연습할 때 빠르게 발음해도 명확하게 들리도록 연습하세요.
  • "vulnerability" - /ˌvʌlnərəˈbɪləti/로, "l"과 "n"이 연속되어 발음하기 어렵습니다. 천천히 발음하면서 각 음소를 명확히 구분해보세요.
  • "sovereignty" - /ˈsɑːvrənti/로, "reign" 부분이 약하게 발음됩니다. 유튜브 영어 공부할 때 반복해서 듣고 따라해보세요.

이제 shadowing site를 찾아 이 비디오를 반복해서 연습해보세요! 작은 발음부터 큰 논리까지, 꾸준히 연습하면 스피킹 실력이 분명히 향상될 거예요. 화이팅!

이 영상의 문법

화자가 가장 많이 쓰는 문형을 영상 속 실제 표현과 함께 정리했습니다.

문형영상 속 표현
수동태 be + 과거분사 — 누가 하는지보다 무슨 일이 일어나는지에 초점are left · are thought · be reshaped
현재완료 have/has + 과거분사 — 과거의 일이 지금도 관련이 있을 때has been · has shown · have shot
관계절 who / which + 절 — 사람이나 사물에 대한 추가 정보Kerala, which is · people who do

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법

쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.

섀도잉 방법: 단계별 전체 가이드 읽기 →