Shadowing Practice: Introduction to Cognitive Bias: Crash Course Scientific Thinking #1 - Learn English Speaking with Video
Kies een oefenmodus
Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.
158 zinnen
Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.
1
Two thousand years ago, people looked up at the sky and they saw that everything up there seemed to move.
2
So naturally, the Earth was staying still, and everything else was rotating around us.
3
It was a story that just made sense to millions of people, and it stuck around well into the 16th century.
4
If I'd been alive then, I would have believed this story.
5
I mean, even today, I feel like I must be at the center of something.
6
That idea, of course, was wrong.
7
But we didn't believe it forever we've found ways to step out of our old stories and find something much more interesting.
8
Hi, I'm Hank Green, and this is Crash Course Scientific Thinking.
9
Science!
10
It is a never-ending quest for knowledge, a way of interrogating our universe to figure out how it works, a tool to guide us when our intuition isn't enough.
11
And also, it can be quite fun.
12
Sometimes you get to pull stuff up.
13
In the years since Copernicus put forth the theory that the Earth revolves around the Sun, we've learned that some questions are just too big,
14
too complex, or too bizarre to trust our gut with.
15
When we rely on intuition alone to answer those big, complicated questions, our brains fall prey to cognitive biases,
16
predictable weaknesses in the way we've evolved to think.
17
Our brains are very good at finding patterns.
18
We've evolved this skill because it's super helpful for survival.
19
It helped our ancestors spot the telltale signs of predators and recognize when certain plants might be poisonous.
20
We have always paid attention to and learned from our world.
21
Those pattern recognition skills have also been linked to some very special human qualities, like our ability to imagine and invent.
22
Like, it's what made me notice that Hank and Anglerfish sound vaguely similar, so that I could invent something called the Hanklerfish.
23
Bad puns are still good pattern recognition.
24
It's also why we are so good at telling stories, because really, that's all a story is.
25
A recognizable pattern of information.
26
And more importantly, our highly evolved pattern recognition skills allow our brains to apply mental shortcuts
27
or heuristics that help us solve simple problems quickly and make life livable.
28
They are the brain's way of copy-pasting stories we already have onto new information
29
so that we don't expend a bunch of brain power in every direction all the time.
30
They are why I don't have to stop and think, what will happen if I touch this hot stove top?
31
My brain picked up the pattern of touching hot things bad long ago, and it keeps resurfacing it whenever I need it to keep me safe.
32
And that's all well and good for avoiding hot things, but those same mental shortcuts also open us up to cognitive bias.
33
Now, cognitive bias isn't inherently bad, and that's good because everybody's got it.
34
And I'm not talking about explicit bias here, where someone is consciously aware that they are discriminating against a person.
35
Cognitive biases happen unconsciously.
36
They are implicit biases, when our decision-making is influenced by beliefs and patterns we aren't even consciously aware of.
37
Consider this modern-day example of a cognitive bias, skewing many people's perception of risk.
38
In early 2025, after a mid-air collision between a commercial airplane and a military helicopter,
39
People started paying a lot of attention to every near-miss and airport mishap, and it felt like planes were crashing every day.
40
The media ran with this, and the algorithms amplified it.
41
At the time, 65% of Americans said they felt more anxious about flying.
42
But when we took a look at the actual data, the number of accidents compared to the same time in 2024 remained the same,
43
and flying remained an incredibly safe form of travel.
44
So why did so many of us feel like it wasn't?
45
Well, for efficiency, our brains often put more weight on the most readily available information around.
46
We call this — wait for it — availability bias, when people make judgments based on the information that's easily available.
47
The truth is, you're far more likely to be in a car crash than a plane crash.
48
But when plane crashes do happen, we hear about them a lot, especially in today's algorithm-driven news cycle.
49
So that information is way easier to call to mind than the fact
50
that over 120 people in the US die in car accidents every day.
51
Availability bias is a big way our brains mislead us.
52
But probably the biggest is confirmation bias.
53
That's our brain's tendency to accept information that agrees with things we already believe and filter out stuff that contradicts it.
54
Like, if someone already believed that flying was dangerous, then the news stories about the 2025 crash likely reinforced that belief.
55
Or here's an example you might be familiar with.
56
Have you ever been told that you are a visual learner, or maybe that you learn best by listening to other people?
57
In a study published in the Journal of Educational Psychology,
58
more than 90% of participants said that people learn better when they're taught using the learning style that best suits them.
59
A similar survey of colleges in the US revealed that out of the 39 surveyed, 29 of them teach learning style theory as part of their guidance for teachers.
60
And here's the kicker, there is no scientific evidence to support the idea of personalized learning styles.
61
So why is this myth so prevalent?
62
Researchers have pointed out that it persists at least in part thanks to confirmation bias.
63
As one researcher put it, people are obviously different and learning styles appear to offer educators a way to accommodate individual learner differences.
64
So someone who believes they've seen these methods have a positive impact might reject evidence against them,
65
just like I might and sometimes do reject evidence that the butt is not part of the legs.
66
And these are just a few of the cognitive biases we all have.
67
We haven't even gotten into how we cling to first impressions, that's anchoring bias, or how we tend to believe the events of the past were predictable, that's hindsight bias.
68
Ultimately, we all want the world to make sense.
69
But when we rely on these simple shortcuts for the wrong things, they can keep us from being open to evidence.
70
So what do we do about this?
71
Well, over the last few centuries, humans have developed a new way of looking at the world.
72
One that doesn't just explain what feels right, but tests what is right.
73
This is what people are usually talking about when they say the word science.
74
Not the body of knowledge, but the systems used to interrogate the universe.
75
From astronomy to zoology, science is a way of building knowledge that's durable, communal, and long-lasting.
76
And to help us learn more, I think we need a little Sage advice.
77
Let's give it up for science, everyone!
78
Hi, Sage, everybody to Sage.
79
Hello, I'm Sage the Bad Naturalist.
80
I'm a dork, a painter, a creator of the YouTube channel Sage the Bad Naturalist.
81
I make videos about fungi, plants, research papers, and learning something new, even when science goes wrong.
82
And I'm here to help Hank spread some...
83
sage advice.
84
I love that we're talking about cognitive bias today, Hank, because the process of science is actually designed to overcome biases,
85
from methods to reliance on evidence, and especially the fact that science is communal.
86
It gets vetted by a whole community, not just one guy in a bathtub shouting, Eureka!
87
No shame to Archimedes, of course.
88
I personally love peer review, which we'll talk about in a later episode.
89
But Sage, what is your favorite bias-busting science method?
90
For me, it has to be randomized control trials.
91
It's a multi-step process for research that's used a lot in testing new medicine, and each step was designed to reduce the chance of bias.
92
Say scientists want to test a new diabetes medicine.
93
Well, there's a lot of potential for bias in that process.
94
Like, they might accidentally influence the results of the trial by their selection of the participants.
95
That's why we say everyone has cognitive bias, even scientists.
96
Exactly.
97
So to avoid those biases, scientists select the members at random.
98
And when they're testing a new drug, there's all kinds of potential for confirmation bias.
99
So they sort some of the members into a control group that gets either no treatment, a placebo, which looks like the real drug but doesn't actually do anything,
100
or an older proven drug.
101
That way they can compare the results.
102
I love a randomized control trial
103
because it is such a good example of the ways
104
that scientists have recognized their own potential for bias and designed their research to reduce it as much as possible.
105
Like how sometimes when researchers need to eliminate bias even further, they do double-blind studies where neither the participants or the scientists know
106
which people are in the trial and which are in the control.
107
Right?
108
Scientific thinking at work.
109
We've come so far from thinking we're the center of the solar system.
110
Science High Five!
111
And that's been your Sage advice.
112
Thanks, Sage.
113
And here's the coolest part.
114
You can watch out for cognitive bias in your own thinking, too.
115
One of the easiest
116
and most important things you can do to fight back against bias is just understanding
117
that it's real and accepting that you have it.
118
Being aware of bias gives you the chance to look out for its influence on your decisions.
119
Anybody who says they don't have any biases is just waving a huge red flag.
120
Another way is to interact with lots of people, especially people who are different from you.
121
Bias likes to tell us that our experience is the only reality.
122
But to really understand the world, we need community.
123
Scientists do this too.
124
They are endlessly testing and vetting each other's claims.
125
Without expertise from a diversity of scientists, the scientific process would fail.
126
And by that same token, you can't overcome your biases on your own either.
127
Unlike those gut feelings we get, science requires evidence.
128
So whenever we consume science news that goes against an idea or experience we believe to be true,
129
it's good to remember that our cognitive bias might be working against us.
130
Which ties into another big bias buster, cognitive flexibility.
131
Your ability to imagine options or explanations beyond your gut reaction.
132
In other words, being able to say, you know what?
133
Maybe I was wrong.
134
I know, right?
135
In this economy?
136
On this internet?
137
You can do it, though.
138
It's good for you.
139
Throughout this series, we're going to talk a lot more about how the scientific process works, so that when we see news stories about science,
140
we'll better understand what's going on behind the scenes.
141
And that knowledge is going to help us all respond better to the science on our social media feeds, in our group chats, and at our dinner tables.
142
By the way, isn't it just extremely wild that our brains can think of ways to outsmart the ways they think?
143
Remember, we all have cognitive biases.
144
They're not something to be ashamed of.
145
They're just our brain's way of solving problems faster.
146
But the world is very weird.
147
So often, our mental shortcuts don't work.
148
That's where scientific thinking comes in.
149
Science relies on evidence evaluated by a community of experts.
150
And it has systems that are designed to reduce bias.
151
It's not perfect, but it's one of the best tools we have.
152
Next time, we're going to explore the wild world of statistics.
153
I'll see you then.
154
This episode of Crash Course Scientific Thinking was produced in partnership with HHMI Biointeractive,
155
bringing real science stories to thousands of high school and undergrad life science classrooms.
156
If you're a teacher, visit their website for resources that explore the topics we discussed in today's video.
157
Thanks for watching this episode of Crash Course Scientific Thinking, which was filmed in Missoula, Montana and was made with the help of all of these nice people.
158
If you want to help keep Crash Course free for everyone forever, you can join our community on Patreon.
App downloaden
Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken
AI UitspraakScoor elke zin
IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid
WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op
WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt
Zelfde Kanaal
B21
The Bicameral Congress: Crash Course Government and Politics #2
Daily ConversationHigh School StudentsUniversity Students
B21
Crash Course US History Preview
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C1What's all the Yellen About? Monetary Policy and the Federal Reserve: Crash Course Economics #10
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C12
How Water Shapes the Land: Crash Course Geology #9
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
B24
How Often do Asteroids Hit the Earth?: Crash Course Geology #20
Daily ConversationHigh School StudentsUniversity Students
B210
Crash Course Sex Ed Preview
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
Derivatives: Crash Course Physics #2
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C13
Indus Valley Civilization: Crash Course World History #2
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
B22
Ancient Egypt: Crash Course World History #4
Daily ConversationHigh School StudentsUniversity Students
C12
What is Engineering?: Crash Course Engineering #1
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B22
The Persians & Greeks: Crash Course World History #5
Cambridge Exam PrepHigh School StudentsUniversity Students
C13
The Secret to Business Writing: Crash Course Business - Soft Skills #3
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
Supervised Learning: Crash Course AI #2
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C1Why Are US Politics Today So Divisive?: Crash Course US Government #1
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C13
The Periodic Table: Crash Course Chemistry #4
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepCambridge Exam Prep
B22
Where Do Diamonds Come From?: Crash Course Geology #8
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepCambridge Exam Prep
C11
Tissues, Part 1: Crash Course Anatomy & Physiology #2
Cambridge Exam PrepUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
Where Did Democracy Come From, and Does It Still Work?
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C12
The Nucleus: Crash Course Chemistry #1
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B21
Defense Against the Dark Arts of Influence: Crash Course Business Soft Skills #2
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
FOR YOU
Aanbevolen Video
C191
38 zinnen
Crash Course Scientific Thinking Preview
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C12
233 zinnen
Are we WRONG about most FAMOUS LINGUISTICS experiment??
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepCambridge Exam Prep
C114
48 zinnen
Why birds don't crash (and what humans can learn from them)
British AccentIELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C17
13 zinnen
Our Brains Are Not Special. But Why Are We?
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C12
124 zinnen
bassham ch3pt1
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepCambridge Exam Prep
C1158 zinnen
Introduction to Biology: Crash Course Biology #1
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepCambridge Exam Prep
C12
73 zinnen
Did Caveman Believe in God?
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C18
549 zinnen
Philosophy of Science Lecture #1: Introduction
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepCambridge Exam Prep
C17
74 zinnen
The “Nietzsche Thesis”: Why we don’t really care about truth
British AccentIELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C19
92 zinnen
What Do Alien Civilizations Look Like? The Kardashev Scale
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C15
35 zinnen
SEtalk: Why We Hate Being Wrong
British AccentIELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C18
30 zinnen
Technology Made Us Human
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les
Deze spreekles op niveau C1 is gebaseerd op de video “Introduction to Cognitive Bias: Crash Course Scientific Thinking”. Deze woorden komen het vaakst terug: bias, science, cognitive, biases, sage. Deze video bevat 158 zinnen en 2056 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 11:43. De spreker praat in een natuurlijk tempo van ongeveer 176 woorden per minuut, dicht bij een alledaags gesprek. 83% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden; de rest kun je beter vooraf bekijken.
Belangrijke woorden in deze video
De 15 moeilijkste woorden uit de video, met uitspraak en betekenis:
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| sage zelfstandig naamwoord | /seɪd͡ʒ/ | salie, echte salie |
| shortcut zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈʃɔːtkʌt/ | sluiproute |
| participant zelfstandig naamwoord | /pɑːɹˈtɪsəpənt/ | deelnemer, participant |
| evolve werkwoord | /ɪˈvɑlv/ | ontwikkelen |
| researcher zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈɹiˌsɝ.t͡ʃɚ/ | onderzoeker |
| confirmation zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˌkɑn.fəɹˈmeɪ.ʃən/ | bevestiging |
| interrogate werkwoord | /ɪnˈtɛɹəɡeɪt/ | verhoren, ondervragen |
| consciously bijwoord | bewust | |
| intuition zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˌɪn.tjuːˈɪʃ.ən/ | intuïtie |
| invent werkwoord | /ɪnˈvɛnt/ | uitvinden, uitdenken |
| predictable bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /pɹəˈdɪktəbləl/ | voorspelbaar |
| vet werkwoord | /vɛt/ | controleren, checken |
| algorithm zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈælɡəɹɪðm̩/ | algoritme |
| amplify werkwoord | /ˈæm.plə.faɪ/ | versterken, vergroten |
| ancestor zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈæn.sɛs.tɚ/ | voorouder |
Phrasal verbs die je zult horen
| Woord | Betekenis |
|---|---|
| figure out werkwoord | uitvogelen, er achter komen |
| pick up werkwoord | oppakken, optillen |
| point out werkwoord | aanwijzen, aanduiden |
Zinnen om te herhalen
Korte, volledige zinnen uit de video die je in alledaagse gesprekken kunt gebruiken:
- Let's give it up for science, everyone!
- In other words, being able to say, you know what?
- They're just our brain's way of solving problems faster.
Grammatica in deze video
De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:
| Structuur | In de video |
|---|---|
| Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telt | we've found · we've learned · we've evolved |
| Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet | been linked · is influenced · been told |
| Betrekkelijke bijzinnen who / which + zin — extra informatie over een persoon of ding | someone who believes · Anybody who says · people who are |
Uitspraak om op te letten
De spreker gebruikt 39 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals I'm, we've, don't. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.
- De “th”-klanken: algorithm /ˈælɡəɹɪðm̩/, bathtub /ˈbæθtʌb/, myth /mɪθ/
- De klanken “sh” en “zh”: shortcut /ˈʃɔːtkʌt/, confirmation /ˌkɑn.fəɹˈmeɪ.ʃən/, intuition /ˌɪn.tjuːˈɪʃ.ən/, unconsciously /ˌʌnˈkɑnʃəsli/, collision /kəˈlɪʒn̩/
- Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: participant /pɑːɹˈtɪsəpənt/, confirmation /ˌkɑn.fəɹˈmeɪ.ʃən/, interrogate /ɪnˈtɛɹəɡeɪt/, intuition /ˌɪn.tjuːˈɪʃ.ən/, predictable /pɹəˈdɪktəbləl/
Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:
- Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: sage /seɪd͡ʒ/, evolve /ɪˈvɑlv/, bathtub /ˈbæθtʌb/, expend /ɪkˈspɛnd/, mislead /mɪsˈliːd/
- /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: algorithm /ˈælɡəɹɪðm̩/, amplify /ˈæm.plə.faɪ/, ancestor /ˈæn.sɛs.tɚ/, bathtub /ˈbæθtʌb/, mishap /ˈmɪshæp/
- /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: interrogate /ɪnˈtɛɹəɡeɪt/, algorithm /ˈælɡəɹɪðm̩/, vaguely /ˈveɪɡli/
Zo oefen je met deze video
- Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
- Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
- Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als sage, shortcut, participant.
Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?
Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.