Shadowing Practice: The Absurd Engineering Behind the Internet - Learn English Speaking with Video
Les maken...
1
In 1887 a young physics teacher attached a thin glass rod to the end of an arrow
2
and loaded it into his homemade crossbow.
3
He torched the rod's end until a molten glass bead roughly
4
the size of a pin's head was barely hanging on and then he fired the arrow.
5
Bright sunlight streaming into the room glinted off a tiny glass fiber.
6
At its thinnest it was is less than a tenth of the diameter of a human hair.
7
Now, legally, we cannot shoot a crossbow indoors.
8
Luckily, I am pretty quick.
9
Oh, God.
10
That's cool.
11
Look at that.
12
Look how thin we got it.
13
The physics teacher was using these fibers to measure very small forces, but in the decades that followed, other researchers found a different use for them, sending light signals.
14
Glass fibers can carry light even through bends.
15
Look, look, it's like that's 90 degrees.
16
And during the 1960s, the telecoms industry was desperate for a better way to carry more information.
17
As one American engineer said, it should be possible to transmit all of the conversations going
18
on anywhere in the world simultaneously over a single thread of light.
19
But these glass fibers were terrible.
20
The light It faded so much that you couldn't decode a signal after just one kilometer.
21
No one thought they'd be practical, except for one man.
22
His own boss called his dream a wild goose chase.
23
But if he was right, if he could prove that fiber optics were in fact viable, and if someone could then figure out how to make them at scale, well, eventually they could connect continents.
24
How much is in this warehouse?
25
There's millions of kilometers here that we're pushing through here every month.
26
It's approximately three times as hot as the surface of the sun.
27
That's crazy.
28
And one day, it could build the internet.
29
All that was unimaginable in the 1960s.
30
But even then, telecom companies wanted a better communication system, just for phone calls.
31
Between 1960 and 1973, the number of daily calls doubled in the US, from 285 million to 576 million.
32
In that same time period, NASA sent people to the moon for a total cost of $26 billion,
33
while AT &T had to spend nearly triple that amount just to install new telephone infrastructure.
34
They just couldn't keep up with the demand.
35
At the time, phone calls were mostly transmitted over copper wires.
36
Now, imagine I'm trying to phone my buddy Gregor.
37
Now, when I pick up, a constant current immediately flows through the wire to supply power to the phone.
38
When I speak, my voice vibrates a tiny diaphragm in the mouthpiece that modulates the current.
39
The louder I am, the bigger the current swing, and my voice's pitch changes how fast the current oscillates.
40
At Gregor's end, that current reaches a speaker that turns it back into sound.
41
Now, this works for one call on one line.
42
But phone companies aren't gonna install wires between every single house.
43
One cable needs to carry multiple calls.
44
So phone companies figure out a neat little trick.
45
Even though humans can hear frequencies up to 20 kilohertz, you really only need to hear the ones between 300 and 3 ,400 hertz to understand what someone's saying.
46
So, phone companies drop frequencies above 4kHz, or anything outside the voice band.
47
But if everyone used that 0 -4kHz band on the same line, well then all the conversations would be on top of each other, and you wouldn't be able to hear the person that you're talking to.
48
Luckily, we can shift those electrical signals.
49
So my conversation can use 0 -4kHz, while another person's can use 4 -8kHz.
50
And so on, all the way down the same copper wire.
51
At the other end, a filter separates out the different frequency bands, similar to how radio can tune in to one station.
52
Then the signal is shifted back down to the 0 to 4 kHz range before it hits the speaker, so it sounds like a normal voice.
53
But as phone companies started using higher and higher frequencies, they started running into problems.
54
That oscillating current carrying the signal generates additional fields.
55
A magnetic field, shown here in red, and little loops of current called eddy currents, which are shown here in blue.
56
Now because of their shape, those loops resist changes to the current at the center of the wire, and they reinforce changes along the surface.
57
But eddy currents get stronger the faster the signal changes, and if you want more calls, you need more bands, which use higher and higher frequencies,
58
so soon the eddy currents are strong enough to cancel out the oscillation in the center of the wire.
59
But if the signal can only travel along the wire's surface, it's limited to a smaller cross -section, so resistance goes up and higher frequency signals can't travel very far before they're absorbed.
60
For a while, telephone companies were able to work around the high loss by boosting signals every few kilometers
61
but past 65 megahertz well the high frequencies died off in less than two kilometers So, they were too impractical to use.
62
And this trade -off between signal power and data rate was actually discovered back in 1948.
63
The Shannon -Hartley theorem described the maximum capacity of a communication channel based on the signal power, noise, and bandwidth, or the difference between the highest and lowest frequencies.
64
The best way to increase capacity is to increase the bandwidth.
65
But they'd already reached the limit for copper.
66
The telecoms industry didn't have another alternative.
67
But then they saw the light visible light has frequencies in
68
the hundreds of terahertz as one researcher for Bell Labs put it the possibility of extremely high frequencies
69
and accordingly vastly wider bands of frequencies appeared as a fabulous El Dorado always beckoning us onward but
70
if you're gonna use light there are two problems first there
71
wasn't a strong enough light source to send a signal a
72
light bulb couldn't produce enough power there just weren't any options and along
73
There's a running joke that the laser was a solution looking for a problem, but that's not really true.
74
It rejuvenated the interest in possible optical communications.
75
As one Bell Labs engineer said, think of all this bandwidth!
76
But they couldn't figure out the second problem.
77
Glass is not as clear as it looks.
78
Only a small amount of light actually makes it through.
79
In fact, only a year after the laser's invention, a Bell Labs scientist started looking into fiber optics.
80
His boss told him to check its loss, or how much a light signal weakens as it travels through the glass.
81
Now, signal loss is measured with decibels, similar to how you measure audio volume.
82
Both are on a logarithmic scale.
83
But while volume uses sound pressure, loss uses signal power.
84
His boss said it would only be worthwhile if the loss was less than 20 decibels a kilometer, so it was comparable to copper.
85
But when he checked the loss for the best fibers, a thousand decibels a kilometer.
86
To understand just how bad that was, imagine a leaky truck carrying sand over one kilometer.
87
If the truck starts with 100 kilograms and it ends up with one, Well, that represents a loss of 20 decibels per kilometer, that's only 1 % of the signal left.
88
It's what was happening with copper.
89
Bad but still manageable.
90
A loss of 1000 decibels a kilometer is like starting with the mass of the observable universe, and ending up with less than the mass of a single atom.
91
To be practical, these fibers would need to improve by a factor of 10 to the 98th.
92
It sounded impossible, it would have to be one of the most absurd engineering improvements in history.
93
So Bell Labs gave up, and fiber optics might have died right there, if it wasn't for one man.
94
Charles Cow.
95
In 1960, he started working for an English telecoms lab that was looking for a way to communicate with higher frequencies, but not with fiber optics.
96
Cow's boss said that it was a wild goose chase, and the rest of the lab agreed.
97
But Cow kept coming back to it, asking, why is glass so lossy?
98
And can we remove those factors, or are they intrinsic to the material?
99
If it was the latter, then fiber would be dead in the water.
100
But if not, then maybe it had a chance.
101
So the question was, why was the loss so high?
102
Well, you might think it's because light is exiting through the sides of this fiber.
103
But glass is really good at trapping light, even through bends.
104
Here's how.
105
I've got a bucket of propylene glycol here, and a green laser.
106
When I remove the tape...
107
The laser bounces one, two, three times, and there are two things working together here that actually trap the light.
108
See light travels slower in some materials than others, and it travels as a wave, shown here as a line of crests, with the beam always pointing perpendicular to that line.
109
When the wave meets a boundary at an angle, one end of the crest crosses into the new material first, and it changes speed before the rest.
110
If light travels slower in that new material, then that end drags behind, and the beam bends, or refracts, away from the boundary.
111
How much it bends depends on the angle it hits the boundary, and on how much each material slows light down, which is described by their index of refraction.
112
This relationship is defined by Snell's law.
113
Now, if light is moving from a material with a higher index of refraction, into one with a lower index, like propylene glycol to air, well then one part of the wave crest speeds up,
114
and the beam bends toward the boundary.
115
But as you increase the angle of the light, the refracted beam gets closer and closer to the boundary, until it's running right along it.
116
That's the critical angle.
117
A little bit more, and all the light reflects back into the glycol.
118
That's total internal reflection, and you get the exact critical angle by setting the angle of refraction to 90 degrees and then rearranging Snell's Law.
119
The key of it is, the bigger the difference in index of refraction, the more powerful this effect is.
120
If I have a really subtle difference between these two, then the amount of bending that takes place will be smaller.
121
You can do the same demo with water, but propylene glycol works a bit better because it has a higher refractive index.
122
1 .43 compared with 1 .33.
123
See, once the liquid is low enough for the angle of the stream to be much sharper, the light breaks through the water stream but it stays trapped in the propylene glycol.
124
And if you use something with an even higher refractive index, like the glass types Cal was investigating, well, then the critical angle decreases even more,
125
which traps the light signals through even sharper turns.
126
Okay, but the light has to move from a high refractive index to a low one, an air that works right up until something touches the glass.
127
If you disturb that boundary, well, light can leak out the side.
128
So about a decade before Cal, researchers realized that a fiber needed to have two types of glass.
129
The middle, the core, has the higher refractive index, and around it goes a second glass, the cladding, with the lower refractive index.
130
Together they keep the light trapped.
131
Now the fiber could be touched, coated in plastic, buried in a cable, bent around things, and the light would still travel down the core and come out the other end.
132
So Kao knew that if the high loss wasn't from light leaking out the sides, well it had to be from something else.
133
He spoke with material scientists and glass experts, but no one seemed to know what was really causing it.
134
He kept looking, and eventually he landed on two potential sources, scattering and absorption.
135
If you shine light through a perfect crystal that's transparent, there's going to be a little bit of reflection, but almost all of the electromagnetic energy will keep going down in the same direction that it started.
136
But glass isn't a crystalline solid.
137
The basic building block is silica, or silicon dioxide, one silicon atom connected to four oxygen atoms in a tetrahedron, or pyramid shape.
138
In the glass, the pyramids are connected at the corners, so every oxygen is shared with another silicon.
139
That's why it's called silicon dioxide.
140
For every two oxygens, there's one silicon atom.
141
This is an amorphous solid.
142
Unlike a crystal, its atoms have no long range order.
143
Instead, its disordered, liquid -like structure locks in as it cools, with the exact arrangement depending on the glass type and cooling speed.
144
For example, if you quench the glass really fast, the structure locks at a higher temperature.
145
The final solid has lots of dense regions, which re -radiate more light than the sparse ones.
146
The light scatters which weakens the signal.
147
This is called Rayleigh scattering, and you can't get rid of it completely.
148
But if you cool the glass slowly, those pyramids have more time to settle and pack together evenly.
149
The structure locks in at a lower temperature, and light scatters less.
150
But Kao needed to know the minimum scattering.
151
Was it 10 decibels a kilometer?
152
100?
153
1000?
154
He needed something concrete.
155
Finally, he stumbled on a paper by Robert Maurer, a scientist from Korn and Glass, who measured the Rayleigh scattering across several glass types and cooling rates.
156
Kao used his calculations to estimate that if the glass's structure was locked at 1000 degrees Celsius, its scattering loss would be around 1 decibel a kilometer.
157
He was surprised.
158
He expected scattering loss to increase with higher temperatures.
159
That's what causes more density fluctuations.
160
But a thousand degrees Celsius was pretty hot compared to other glass types.
161
So then scattering couldn't be behind those crazy high losses.
162
Absorption had to be the problem.
163
But Kao didn't know what exactly was absorbing so much light.
164
Was it the glass itself or something else?
165
Well, absorption works like this.
166
In a single atom, electrons sit at discrete energy levels, and they're usually some empty spaces in the upper ones.
167
But pack atoms together into a solid, and those levels smear up, into wide bands separated by gaps.
168
Now when light hits the surface, it can excite an electron to a higher band.
169
But only if the photon has at least as much energy as this band gap.
170
If it does, the photon is absorbed, and eventually it releases that energy as heat.
171
In something like silicon, that band gap is very small.
172
It's only around 1 .12 electron volts.
173
Visible light is between 1 .63 to 3 .26.
174
It's got plenty of energy, so it gets absorbed.
175
That's why pure silicon looks opaque to us, but the silicon in glass is connected to oxygen atoms that pull more on the shared electrons.
176
Now it takes a lot more energy to excite an electron.
177
The band gap is much larger, around 9 electron volts.
178
Visible light doesn't have enough energy, so it passes right through.
179
And that's why glass looks clear to us.
180
But most glass types aren't pure silica.
181
The raw materials for glass—sand, soda, lime, and other ingredients—well, they contain impurities like trace metals,
182
and these metals absorb far more light than silica did.
183
One of the worst impurities in glass is iron.
184
Inside the glass structure, iron atoms form positive ions that strongly absorb violet -bluish and infrared wavelengths.
185
Of the visible light spectrum, impure glass doesn't absorb green light as much.
186
And you can even see this in a regular glass plane.
187
Looking at it from the edge, light travels down the entire width of the glass.
188
So by the time it reaches your eye, only green light is left.
189
So if you can see this attenuation after just a few centimeters, imagine a glass fiber trying to carry light for kilometers and kilometers.
190
No wonder it at a crazy loss.
191
Kao spoke with more experts, who estimated that without those metal ions, the loss would drop to around 20 decibels a kilometer, copperable to copper, just by removing impurities.
192
It was all theoretical at this point, but it was enough for Kao.
193
In 1966, his team published a paper on their theories, concluding with, The crucial material problem appears to be one which is difficult but not impossible.
194
But nobody really paid attention to his paper because it really seemed impossible.
195
A 10 to the 98 times improvement was unprecedented, and Kao didn't actually measure the loss in glass.
196
He didn't have anything concrete, so he needed proof.
197
Kao was trying to invent a new way to communicate, but even today, actually staying connected can be hard.
198
In fact, we just traveled to Spain for the eclipse a few weeks ago, but with so many other projects going on, we still need to check in and set updates to the rest of the team.
199
Not to mention my mom.
200
We drove seven hours to Burgos, but the Wi -Fi when we got there was a little touch -and -go.
201
We needed to have everything set before we arrived on site, so of course we used Salee, today's sponsor.
202
After I downloaded their app and activated my eSIM, all I had to do was choose my data plan and country, and then I was set before I'd even reached the airport.
203
It's available in over 200 destinations, and they even offer regional plans, which is great if I have an extended shoot in multiple countries.
204
I'm automatically connected right when I land ready to update my team access maps
205
or get transportation to wherever I'm filming I install the eSIM once and I use it almost anywhere in the world.
206
There's no hidden charges So it's extremely affordable and convenient.
207
Actually, let me show you Wait, I can't get SMS messages right now
208
But with sale you can now get a US phone number right through the app for voice calls
209
or SMS messages as an optional add -on There's no contract or physical SIM card needed.
210
So if you've got a trip coming up, and you still don't know where you're going to get your data, well, you can scan this QR code for the Caley app, and check out with code VERITASIUM to get 15 % off your first purchase.
211
Again, just scan this QR code, use the code VERITASIUM, and get 15 % off, and you can stay connected.
212
Now, let's go back to Cao.
213
Cao needed to prove that his theoretical low -loss glass was really possible, so he decided to measure the purest glass anyone had ever made, fusilica.
214
Now, the reason glass manufacturers had added all those extra ingredients
215
was to bring sand's melting point down to around 1400 degrees Celsius.
216
But fused silica was pure silicon dioxide, melted at over 2000 degrees Celsius, so it was a lot harder to make.
217
And that meant that Cao couldn't get his hands on much of it.
218
Measuring loss normally takes hundreds of meters of cable, if not kilometers, but he only had pieces less than 30 centimeters long.
219
To measure the loss in something that small, he and his colleagues invented a new, very precise instrument.
220
Cao spent the next three years working on it, but when he finally measured a sample, he found that fusilica had zero loss.
221
That couldn't be right.
222
In a panic, Cao ran his experiment again.
223
It turned out that the loss was so low that it was within their margin of error, a mere plus or minus four decibels a kilometer.
224
He spent months fine -tuning his equipment, And in 1969, he finally reported that fused silica had a loss of less than five decibels a kilometer.
225
Now that got everyone's attention.
226
One scientist at Bell Labs said, Now everyone was interested.
227
Telecom labs around the planet rushed to fund fiber optics groups.
228
But Cal had only worked with small samples.
229
Nobody knew whether kilometers of low -loss fiber were even possible.
230
The problem caught the attention of one Robert Maurer, Corning researcher and author of the scattering paper that Kao had referenced.
231
To make a practical fiber, he saw three major problems to tackle.
232
First, he needed to decide which glass to use.
233
He could try purifying raw materials for normal glass, or he could try using fused silica, which Kao had already proven to be very pure.
234
Most labs were avoiding fused silica because of how hard it was to work with.
235
But luckily, Corning had a secret technique.
236
Back in the 1930s, another Corning scientist had ran silicon tetrachloride gas through an oxygen flame.
237
In the heat, water vapor from the flame would break silicon tetrachloride into hydrogen chloride gas and silicon dioxide.
238
The latter would then start clicking together in a fine glassy silica powder.
239
Then the powder would be pressed into shape and melted to make few silica.
240
Corning was one of the few companies in the world using this technique, called flame hydrolysis, to make ultra -pure glass.
241
So they had the supply, but there was a bigger problem with fused silica.
242
it has a refractive index of 1 .46
243
which is the lowest of any glass
244
but for total internal reflection to work the core needs to have a higher refractive index than the cladding so
245
if mauer wanted to use a few silica core well then
246
finding another glass with a lower refractive index for the cladding well that'd be a nightmare it simply didn't exist
247
so everyone abandoned few silica except for mauer he said i
248
had no reason to think few silica was any better But nobody else was working on it.
249
If you do something that's different from what everybody else is doing, you've got two advantages.
250
One is you may succeed where they fail, of course, but even if you fail you will gather information that they don't gather.
251
All the other labs were thinking of using a fused silica core.
252
After all, that's where the light travels.
253
But Maurer decided to use fused silica for the cladding.
254
Then he could easily raise the refractive index of the core by adding some impurities, or dopants.
255
The only glass that we had with a slightly higher index than fused silica was this titanium -doped glass.
256
But that would mean adding titanium right where light needed to travel.
257
Kau worked hard to prove that glass could be pure enough.
258
All the other labs were trying to get rid of impurities, and Maurer wanted to add some back in.
259
But he wasn't completely crazy.
260
Like silicon, the titanium in glass can easily share electrons with four oxygen atoms, forming the same pyramid shape so it wouldn't disrupt the overall glass structure too much.
261
Now that he had the composition, Mauer needed to tackle that second problem.
262
How do you make a tiny fiber with that perfect core and cladding cross -section?
263
To help, he hired two more scientists.
264
Peter Schultz, a ceramics engineer, and Donald Keck, a physicist.
265
Each time you find a problem you put a development team on it and strike it down and make it happen.
266
To understand their technique, I went to the Bay Area Glass Institute for some hands -on demos.
267
Here, our instructor Aaron is taking a colored rod of glass and then dipping it in a bowl of clear molten glass.
268
In fiber optics, this large cylinder is called a preform.
269
We have two colors of glass here.
270
We have a color core and a clear outside.
271
If you want your inner rod to, say, be a quarter of the diameter of your outer one, you just set that in the preform
272
and then all the length along your pole the cross -section is going to be identical.
273
And this is pretty similar to how hard candies with patterns are made.
274
This sugar is an amorphous solid, just like glass.
275
So the process is the same, just at a lower temperature.
276
But there is one problem with this method.
277
Resting glass on a surface like this introduces a ton of stress and impurities.
278
But when I try and suspend it in the air, well it sags.
279
But yeah, from all that movement it did create stress, so now it's a curved piece of of glass.
280
Thankfully there's another option.
281
Now gravity is pulling our glass for us and the surface tension is keeping it together.
282
So now we get a much more straight and consistent fiber.
283
That's awesome.
284
With their drawing technique sorted the cording team could tackle the final problem.
285
How do you actually make the preform?
286
Well instead of starting with a core and adding the cladding, Schultz and Keck decided to start from the cladding and work in.
287
They used the flame hydrolysis technique to make titanium -doped silica powder, or soot as they called it.
288
Next, they took a pure fused silica tube and tried spreading soot down the inside.
289
If they could get an even layer, well then they could melt and collapse the tube into a solid rod, a perfect preform.
290
But the soot collected at one end no matter how they sprayed it.
291
So one of the technicians grabbed a vacuum cleaner from the corner of the room, They held it up to the backside of this tube,
292
and it sucked a stream of titanium -doped silica glass down through the center of the tube,
293
coated it just like we'd hoped it would." Vacuum did not survive that experiment.
294
But they tinkered with a new setup until they got the gas flow just right.
295
All through the summer of 1969, their furnace burned hotter than Hades.
296
They drew kilometers of fiber from preform after preform, testing various compositions.
297
But none of it was good enough.
298
Titanium was breaking down in the high heat and absorbing too much light.
299
They ran the finished fibers through a second heat treatment in an oxygen environment before they finally started seeing results.
300
A year later, on July 22nd of 1970, a preform slipped against the furnace wall after Keck only got a few meters of fiber.
301
The preform was ruined, but he decided to test the short fiber anyway after its heat treatment.
302
When I slid it across and the laser light hit the core of the fiber, all of a sudden I had another beam coming back in my face.
303
The core was brightly lit and it took a while to realize
304
that the light was going all the way to the other end of the fiber
305
and reflecting off the far end
306
and coming back into my eye the loss was 17 decibels
307
a kilometer the only word i could come up with for this auspicious moment in history was whoopee
308
so that's what's in my lab notebook whoopee
309
but the fiber was much shorter than usual only 29 meters to their typical 200.
310
he added a careful must remeasure in his notebook team quickly remade the preform
311
but it took almost a month to get 210 meters of
312
finished fiber it was finally done by late afternoon of friday august 21st it was a gorgeous summer day
313
and almost everyone left early but keck didn't want to wait the fiber was
314
so fragile small temperature changes might break it over the weekend it would break
315
if you looked at it crossways so alone in the lab he anxiously measured the loss 16 .9 decibels per kilometer.
316
I said QED, Quad Edge, Erat Demonstratum.
317
There's no, no Eureka.
318
Maur published their results that fall.
319
As Schultz described it, no one believed it.
320
The telephone companies all demanded to see the fibers firsthand, so Maur hand -carried a spool of fiber to all the big telephone laboratories.
321
He would literally guard to make sure that they They didn't snip pieces off and keep them.
322
For two years, they refined their methods.
323
And to make the fibers stronger, they switched to a germanium doping.
324
Like titanium, it easily swaps with silicon while still raising the refractive index.
325
But unlike titanium, germanium fibers didn't break down in the heat, so they could skip the second heat treatment.
326
When they drew their first germanium fiber, the end lit up with the light from the furnace.
327
Even when it reached the bottom and wound up around a large drum, the fiber stayed bright.
328
And we kept winding and winding and winding, thinking the light was going to go out.
329
And it never went out.
330
The loss was only four decibels per kilometer with excellent strength.
331
Keck considers that the very first truly practical low -loss fiber.
332
By 1977, AT &T trialed a fiber system underneath Chicago.
333
Two years later, a fiber team from Japan was able to get a loss of just 0 .2 decibels a kilometer, the standard up to today.
334
Fiber networks continued to grow, with the first transatlantic fiber optic cable installed by 1988, and it transmitted those phone calls differently than in copper.
335
The audio wave was split up, or sampled into discrete values, and then converted into binary to get a long string of ones and zeros.
336
Then a laser flashed on for one and off for zero, 280 million times a second.
337
These pulses of light traveled down the fiber, but that wasn't all.
338
Multiple conversations could now be weaved together.
339
One bit from one conversation, then from another, and so on, slotting in together like a zipper.
340
As long as the receiver knew the timing of each conversation, and the sampling rate, well they could reconstruct the original waves.
341
So this first intercontinental cable could carry 40 ,000 simultaneous calls, 10 times more than the previous copper version.
342
This insane capacity opened up a whole new world, and with digital signals, people realized that they weren't limited to phone calls.
343
It was easier than ever to send text, images, videos, all building up to the internet.
344
And since then, demand has only increased.
345
This reel right here?
346
Yeah.
347
50 .477 meters, kilometers, so 50 kilometers, so it's about 30 miles.
348
That's crazy.
349
Like how much is in this warehouse?
350
There's millions of kilometers here that we're pushing through here every month.
351
To see how modern fibers are made, we visited Prismian's North Carolina factory.
352
It all starts with the preform.
353
Each pass at this microwave source ignites a mixture of gases into a plasma
354
which deposits a thin layer of glass on the inside of the tube.
355
And you see when it turns purple, that's when we're making a plasma with that gas.
356
So how thick are these deposition layers?
357
How many times are you doing this?
358
How thick are you building this?
359
Thousands of passes.
360
Thousands of passes.
361
Several thousand times it's doing this.
362
Every time we make it go back and forth, we could change the composition of that if we wanted to.
363
After all the inner layers are done, the tube has a thicker wall, but there's still a gap down the middle.
364
So we want to collapse that channel upon itself.
365
So what we do is we heat it up, we have a furnace that goes back and forth, and just by a surface tension, it collapses upon itself.
366
Now they need to add more silicon on the outside to get the preform to the right proportions.
367
The core is very small, just 7 .2 % of the total diameter.
368
And you have a several thousand C plume of plasma right there.
369
There's grains of silica that's flowing into that plume and effectively melting it and spraying it onto that rod.
370
Wow.
371
That plasma torch is approximately three times as hot as the surface of the tunnel.
372
Plasma always blows my mind.
373
This is absurd.
374
Once the preform's done, it goes to the top of the draw tower, seven stories up, to start making fiber.
375
really looks like some sort of steampunk thing you know all these coils and this hot glass going down
376
the bottom of the preform is tapered to a point and heated to over 2 000 degrees celsius
377
it's like there's some heat coming off this the end of
378
the taper slowly drops down to the floor below we call it a gob
379
but it looks like a teardrop the fiber is a little thick
380
so it'll thinned down to the final 125 microns before it passes to the next level.
381
It's like a little flashlight coming out there.
382
I didn't expect it to be so violent.
383
If the drawing, like the pull down to that final diameter happens in such a short amount of time, In a few meters, let's call it.
384
A few meters?
385
Then why do you need six more floors?
386
You've got to cool the glass before you can apply the coating.
387
And if you cool the glass too quickly, it'll have residual stress and then have optical loss, attenuation.
388
Once the fibers are cool enough, they are dipped in two protective plastic coatings.
389
At the bottom of the draw tower, the fiber is wound onto massive spools, each capable of carrying hundreds of kilometers at over 50 meters a second.
390
Next, the finished fiber is tested for loss in strength.
391
Fiber is stronger than a steel wire of the same thickness.
392
I guess if I try to do it like...
393
If you just try to do it like that, it's really hard to break.
394
First of all, it just slides down my hand.
395
And that's a glass fiber with two coatings down.
396
Ah, it's just hurting my hand.
397
Oh my God.
398
Yeah, not easy.
399
Definitely not easy.
400
Ow!
401
But it's weak to sharp turns.
402
Tying in a lot.
403
But after testing, fiber is bundled and wrapped into thicker cables so that it's harder for them to knot and break.
404
These cables will join the more than 8 billion kilometers of fiber already installed, that carry information around the world, powering the internet and letting you watch this video.
405
But some experts argue that even with fiber, the internet would not be possible without another key invention.
406
The amplifier.
407
That's what boosts signals across long stretches, and it revolutionized fiber capacity on land and sea.
408
So if you'd like to see a video about submarine cables and fiber amplifiers, well, let us know in the comments.
409
As for Cao, his dream went further than he ever thought.
410
When he received the Nobel Prize in 2009 for his work, he said the information revolution that started in the 1990s could not have happened without optical fibers.
411
It is beyond the dreams the first serious concept of optical communication in 1966 when even one gigahertz was only a hope.
412
For me one of the things I kept on coming back to in this story is
413
that Cal was not a material scientist.
414
He was an electrical engineer and it was only
415
because he was an outsider that he was able to ask the questions that nobody was asking.
416
He was able to push the status quo.
417
But he was not the only one.
418
Maurer's team were also working with a very unintuitive idea, that by making something seemingly worse, they actually were making it better.
419
As Kao said, who knows what other forward thinkers will dream of in the future.
420
Granted, he was talking about bandwidth, but I think it applies anywhere where people are able to question why things are the way they are, whether that's really the limit.
421
One last thing.
422
These videos are only possible because of the incredible work done by our team behind the scenes.
423
We have world -class editors, animators, researchers, and writers that make these videos possible.
424
We'd love to shine more of a light on their work, so we organized a Q &A with the writer of today's video, Sully.
425
She discusses the fascinating things she learned while researching this topic
426
and things that didn't make the cut but that are really interesting.
427
So if you want to learn more about that, you can sign up for our newsletter in the description and you can find our Q &A right there.
📺 Zelfde Kanaal
C11
Something is jamming GPS over Europe. Here's what we found
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C11
Why It Was Almost Impossible to Make the Blue LED
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
You've (Likely) Been Playing The Game Of Life Wrong
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B22
We're trying something new...
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C120
How does light 'know' the shortest path?
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C12
The CIA's new tech doesn't make sense
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C11
Why does every mammal get 1 billion heartbeats in their life?
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C13
Why Cold Drinks Were Deadly Before 1914
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C14
Exposing The Flaw In Our Phone System
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
Our Greatest Delusion
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C13
The Most Controversial Problem in Philosophy
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B25
Why Boredom is Good For You
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B24
Why Are 96,000,000 Black Balls on This Reservoir?
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C13
We've Been Using The Wrong Science In Court For 50 years
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B24
Explaining Pi With Pizza
University Students
B214
5 Fun Physics Phenomena
Daily ConversationUniversity Students
C11
The Most Misunderstood Concept in Physics
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B11
Falling ladders - why does this happen?
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepHigh School Students
C110
How a slinky falls in slow motion #shorts
University StudentsWorking Adults
C13
We're 99.9% sure this pattern is true, but no one can prove it
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
✨ Aanbevolen Video
C12
249 zinnen
The Speed of Light Isn't a Limit. It's a Converter
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C12
47 zinnen
We Found Galaxies Too Old for the Universe
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B28
14 zinnen
Would You Upload Your Mind?
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C1537 zinnen
The next 50 years: humanity, AI, power | Yuval Noah Harari
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C15
128 zinnen
The Most Insane Megaproject You Never Heard About
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C1552 zinnen
The Professor Who Taught People How To Think (1962)
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C166
66 zinnen
What science can’t answer, according to physicist Jim Al-Khalili | Big Think
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B2104
19 zinnen
Man of the future | Nikola Tesla | edit
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepCambridge Exam Prep
C14
41 zinnen
The Building Blocks of Everything: Matter & its Properties
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B22
61 zinnen
The Goofiest Space Experiment In History
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C13
341 zinnen
Why is this one spot not warming?
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les
Deze spreekles is gebaseerd op de video “The Absurd Engineering Behind the Internet”. Deze woorden komen het vaakst terug: glass, fiber, loss, kilometer, Kao. Deze video bevat 386 zinnen en 6190 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 34:25. De spreker praat snel, ongeveer 180 woorden per minuut, dus reken op verbonden en ingeslikte klanken. Slechts 78% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden, dus de woordenschat is pittig.
Belangrijke woorden in deze video
15 woorden uit de video die het leren waard zijn, met uitspraak en betekenis:
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| fuse zelfstandig naamwoord | /fjuːz/ | lont |
| silicon zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈsɪləˌkɑn/ | silicium |
| frequency zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈfɹiːkwənsi/ | frequentie |
| atom zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈætəm/ | atoom |
| angle zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈæŋ.ɡəl/ | hoek |
| copper zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈkɒpə/ | koper |
| absorb werkwoord | /æbˈsɔɹb/ | absorberen, (in zich) opnemen |
| wire zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈwaɪɚ/ | draad |
| laser zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈleɪzɚ/ | laser |
| meter zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈmitəɹ/ | meter, teller |
| clad werkwoord | /klæd/ | kleden |
| titanium zelfstandig naamwoord | /taɪˈteɪni.əm/ | titanium, titaan |
| tube zelfstandig naamwoord | /tuːb/ | tube |
| oxygen zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈɑksɪd͡ʒən/ | zuurstof |
| corn zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈkɔːn/ | koren |
Phrasal verbs die je zult horen
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| figure out werkwoord | uitvogelen, er achter komen | |
| get off werkwoord | van ... afgaan | |
| go back werkwoord | teruggaan | |
| come out werkwoord | /ˌkʌm ˈaʊt/ | uitkomen |
| come up with werkwoord | bedenken, verzinnen | |
| give up werkwoord | zich overgeven | |
| go down werkwoord | afdalen | |
| go out werkwoord | naar buiten gaan |
Zinnen om te herhalen
Korte, volledige zinnen uit de video die je in alledaagse gesprekken kunt gebruiken:
- How do you actually make the preform?
- I didn't expect it to be so violent.
- Then why do you need six more floors?
Grammatica in deze video
De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:
| Structuur | In de video |
|---|---|
| Voorwaardelijke zinnen if + zin, will/would + werkwoord — een voorwaarde en het gevolg | if you fail you will gather |
| Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet | is shifted · are shown · was actually discovered |
| Betrekkelijke bijzinnen who / which + zin — extra informatie over een persoon of ding | currents, which are · down, which is · one which is |
Uitspraak om op te letten
De spreker gebruikt 63 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals didn't, couldn't, wasn't. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.
- De “th”-klanken: thick /θɪk/, bandwidth /ˈbændwɪdθ/, thin /ˈθɪn/, gather /ˈɡæðɚ/, theoretical /ˌθi.əˈɹɛt.ɪ.kəl/
- De klanken “sh” en “zh”: sharp /ʃɑɹp/, reflection /ɹɪˈflɛkʃən/, absorption /æbˈsɔɹp.ʃn̩/, composition /ˌkɑm.pəˈzɪʃ.ən/, shine /ʃaɪn/
- Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: titanium /taɪˈteɪni.əm/, diameter /daɪˈæmɪdɚ/, electrical /ɪˈlɛktɹɪkəl/, experiment /ɪkˈspɛɹ.ə.mənt/, composition /ˌkɑm.pəˈzɪʃ.ən/
Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:
- Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: fuse /fjuːz/, lab /læːb/, absorb /æbˈsɔɹb/, clad /klæd/, tube /tuːb/
- /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: atom /ˈætəm/, lab /læːb/, angle /ˈæŋ.ɡəl/, absorb /æbˈsɔɹb/, clad /klæd/
- /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: angle /ˈæŋ.ɡəl/, gather /ˈɡæðɚ/, goose /ɡus/, ingredient /ɪnˈɡɹiːdi.ənt/, argue /ˈɑɹ.ɡju/
Zo oefen je met deze video
- Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
- Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
- Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als fuse, silicon, frequency.
Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?
Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.