Shadowing Practice: No device could prove Einstein wrong... until now - Learn English Speaking with Video

Kies een oefenmodus

Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.

467 zinnen

Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.

This might be the most ambitious long -shot precision experiment that I've ever seen.

Scientists have put one atomic clock down in Boulder, Colorado, and one up in this observatory 4 ,000 meters above sea level,

and they're going to try and measure the difference in time dilation according to general relativity.

Because up here, time itself should be passing faster relative to down in Boulder.

If you go into a science center, often they will explain gravity as the bending of space -time,

and what they will have is a little funnel where the particle goes around the funnel,

and that's meant to give you an impression of why the Earth goes around the sun.

But that's not actually what happens.

It's not as much that space is curving, it's that time is stretching.

So the dominant effect of gravity

that we experience is the slowing down of time as we get closer to a massive object.

This is one of the predictions of Einstein's general theory of relativity, and it actually predicts how much faster the mountain clock should be ticking.

Put one clock in Boulder and another 2 .7 kilometers higher, and the mountain clock should gain about 25 billionths of a second every day.

This effect of general relativity and time dilation has been proven in experiments time and time again.

So why are we still testing it?

Because we know that at some quantum scale, this theory of gravity is going to stop working.

The way we know there is some contradiction is that

We know that particles can be in a superposition of two places, here and there.

That's what quantum mechanics tells us.

And what Einstein's theory of general relativity tells us is that if a particle is here, it bends spacetime in a certain way.

And if it's there, it bends spacetime in a certain way.

So what happens to spacetime if a particle with mass is in two places at once?

We don't have an answer to that question.

Einstein's theory of general relativity is silent on the question of what happens to space -time when a particle is in superposition.

And that leaves us with one of the biggest unanswered questions in physics.

Does gravity itself obey the rules of quantum mechanics?

So, teams around the world are trying to pin down exactly where gravity might stop following Einstein's prediction.

And they want to find out if there's a correction term needed in the equations

that might completely change your understanding of the universe.

Which means three massive challenges.

1. Build a clock so accurate it can track time to 18 decimal places.

2. Take that clock out of the lab and into the sky.

3. Find a way to read a signal so fast that electronics can't even process it.

This is the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Boulder, Colorado.

NIST has an atomic clock that is so accurate that if it started counting when the universe began,

it would not have lost or gained a second up until now.

NIST has been home to pretty much every kind of atomic clock ever made, from tiny chip scale clocks

and the most accurate clock on Earth to the first experimental atomic clock from way back in 1949.

And it's that accuracy that makes atomic clocks powerful tools for testing fundamental physics.

This little survey marker is actually in every room

that has an atomic clock at NIST and it's the official telling of

which altitude you're at above sea level so that you can take it into account for when you're aligning the atomic clocks.

They even connect to clocks that are 400 kilometers off the Earth's surface on the International Space Station through this little dome.

Now you might think that an atomic clock runs on radioactivity

because after all we use radioactive decay

and the half -life of elements to date things

that happened billions of years ago and we can do that with an error of less than 1%.

But that is not how an atomic clock works.

For keeping time, we need something that will oscillate back and forth.

For a grandfather clock, it's a pendulum.

And for a wristwatch, it's a piece of quartz that is vibrating under an electric current.

But an atomic clock gets its frequency from a fundamental property of the atom itself.

Electrons can only occupy specific energy levels and they can jump from one level to another by absorbing a photon of light.

But this only happens when a photon's energy matches the energy difference between the two levels, and the energy of a photon depends on its frequency.

So you can use a laser, tune its frequency, and that will change the energy of its photons.

Now, most frequencies are simply ignored, but when the frequency of such a laser is just right,

you get this transition and the electron makes the jump.

And that tells us the atom's natural resonant frequency.

Now we can tune the laser to match that frequency exactly.

And it's the oscillations of this laser light that act as the atomic clock's pendulum.

So this is NIST F3.

It's one of the cesium fountains we operate here at the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

We use these machines in order to experimentally realize the definition of the SI second.

What is the exact frequency?

Count to 9 ,192 ,631 ,770.

And after you've counted that high, you've counted exactly one second.

This clock feeds into a network that helps determine

Coordinated Universal Time, or UTC.

It's the standard that keeps your phone, your computer, and much of the world synchronized.

Now, since 1967, the time it takes for this exact number of cesium -133

oscillations to get past your detector has been the official definition of one second.

Keeping clocks synchronized with each other is a centuries -old problem, and that's because every oscillator has inconsistencies in the way that they're made.

But for atoms, it doesn't matter where you get the atom from.

The natural resonant frequency is the same for all atoms of the same element across the universe.

And it's the arrangement of these electrons, in particular isotopes, that make a very good atomic clock.

So these atoms give us ticks that are incredibly consistent.

How reliably one tick matches the next is the clock's stability.

Some elements are more stable than others, which is why cesium -133 is really popular.

But there's another challenge.

It's one thing for every tick to be consistent.

It's another to know that you're measuring the atom's true ticking rate.

In other words, how close is our measurement to the true atomic frequency?

That is accuracy.

And unlike the atom itself, accuracy comes down to how well the clock is built.

Now, the best cesium atomic clocks are over 50 billion times more accurate than the quartz crystal in your wristwatch.

The overall performance of a clock can be described by how many seconds it will gain or lose in a given time,

expressed as an order of magnitude.

So, what order of magnitude is the cesium clock that we're now using to standardize time?

Those realize fractionally about a part in 10 to the 16 of accuracy.

So, over the course of maybe tens of millions or 100 million years, it would only lose of order a second.

But this is still not good enough to find where gravity might stray from the predictions of general relativity.

If you want a more accurate clock, you can start with finding a higher resonant frequency.

Because the more oscillations you can pack into a second, the more finely you can define it.

And it turns out that elements have different natural frequencies, so you just have to find one that fits.

And the perfect candidate for the job is Iterbium.

I like to say it looks a little bit like iron pyrite, like fool's gold.

While cesium clocks operate in the microwave part of the spectrum, a terbium resonates in the optical band with a frequency 56 ,000 times higher.

This equates to 518 trillion oscillations every second,

and that allows for accuracies of 1 part in 10 to the power of 18.

100

So this clock won't gain or lose a second in more than the age of the universe.

101

But when the ytterbium is solid, the atoms are so close together that neighboring atoms pull each other's electrons out of place.

102

And this broadens and blurs the frequency at which the electrons make the transition.

103

And that makes the natural resonant frequency pretty much impossible to find.

104

So ytterbium first has to be turned into a gas.

105

There's an oven where we heat this up to about 500 Celsius.

106

We make a vapor of it

107

and then at the end of the oven there's actually a hole where just a stream of this stuff comes shooting out.

108

But now these atoms are traveling at around 300 meters per second, which causes a different problem.

109

If an atom is moving towards or away from a photon as it's hit, it will absorb the light at a different frequency.

110

This is called a Doppler shift, and it alters the reading of the natural resonant frequency by one part in a million.

111

An error at the sixth digit, when you're aiming for 18 digits of accuracy, would end the experiment there.

112

So the team has to find a way to slow down the atom's movement once they've reached the main vacuum chamber.

113

You have to cool them down in three dimensions in free space, and so that requires having these laser beams in three dimension as well.

114

So the blue laser operates first.

115

It takes the hot beam of atoms that are at hundreds of Kelvin temperature

116

and brings them all the way down to about a millikelvin or a thousandth of a degree above absolute zero.

117

And then it trades off with the green laser, also propagating along the same axes.

118

And that takes those millikelvin temperature atoms and brings them down to about a microkelvin or so.

119

It might seem counterintuitive that you can cool atoms by firing lasers at them,

120

but what the scientists are doing is using different electron transitions inside Ytterbium -171.

121

They're now taking advantage of that Doppler shift.

122

The lasers are tuned just below the frequency the atoms absorb, so an atom only absorbs light from a beam it's moving towards.

123

And because light carries momentum, each photon it absorbs gives it a tiny kick slowing it down.

124

The atom then emits a photon in a random direction,

125

so over many cycles those random emissions average out while the absorbed photons keep slowing the atoms down.

126

Overall, the lasers can cool the atoms down to just a millionth of a degree above absolute zero.

127

Now, once the atoms are cold, the next challenge is keeping them in one place, and it turns out you need a laser for this too.

128

We'll focus a beam into our vacuum system where the yaterbium atoms are located,

129

and then we'll actually just put a mirror there to reflect it back onto itself.

130

And if we could kind of zoom in enough,

131

we'd see that there's this interference pattern between the two directions that leads to nodes and antinodes of laser intensity.

132

The outgoing and reflected light waves overlap, and in some places they cancel each other out, and in others they reinforce each other.

133

And the result is a repeating pattern called a standing wave.

134

Now, the Iterbium -171 atom is neutral.

135

The charges of its protons and electrons balance out but light is an electromagnetic wave.

136

So the laser beam carries an electric field, and that electric field pulls those charges very slightly in opposite directions.

137

This is called an induced dipole, and it gives the atom a potential energy so that now the electromagnetic force can act on it.

138

The strength of the field varies along that same pattern as the standing wave.

139

The electric field is weakest at the nodes of the wave and strongest at the antinodes.

140

This gives the dipole a potential energy,

141

causing the atom to be drawn closer and closer to the antinode until the field strength starts to level out.

142

You can think of this like holding a marble on the lip of a bowl.

143

Here, the marble has maximum gravitational potential energy, and when you let the marble go and it moves down the slope,

144

the potential gets smaller and smaller until at the bottom of the bowl, it reaches a minimum.

145

The marble can't climb back out of the bowl, so it's trapped.

146

Now, in the same way, the atom is drawn by the electric force away from the

147

point of maximum potential energy to where the potential reaches a minimum.

148

This formation is called an optical lattice.

149

Now the atoms are trapped in antinodes just 300 nanometers across

150

and their movement is so limited that it no longer impacts the measurement.

151

And at last the clock's frequency can be read out.

152

So this software we're looking at the actual clock operation.

153

So over here we measure the number of atoms in the ground state

154

and then here we measure the number of atoms in the excited state.

155

That balance is how the NIST scientists know the laser is still locked onto the atom's natural frequency.

156

So the laser becomes a stand -in for the atoms.

157

Count its oscillations, about 518 trillion of them, and that's a second.

158

You can see that there's this large central chamber which has all of the windows on it.

159

That's where the lasers are inserted into the system.

160

I mean, one question that is in my mind as you're explaining this is, if this is the setup here and you know the lasers

161

that you're using to treat it are on that bench and in the room across the hall.

162

How do you bring this up a mountain?

163

To measure the effect of gravity on time the clock needs to run at different elevations

164

and that means climbing to 4 ,326 meters above sea level to the top of Mount Blue Sky.

165

Oh is that the observatory right there?

166

That is right up there yeah that's where we're headed.

167

Well this is a This is a proper trail.

168

Kind of on the final bends now.

169

We're nearly there.

170

So we just got to the observatory.

171

I went on this little walk to video the view.

172

And I'm kind of out of breath going downhill from up there.

173

That looks pretty cold, Gregor.

174

But this job gets you into some wild situations, whether you're at 14 ,000 feet or stranded out here in the desert.

175

The question is, how do you protect yourself in such extreme environments.

176

Got 60 seconds on the clock.

177

Let's go.

178

Scorching in the desert heat?

179

Wear plenty of sunscreen, drink a lot of water, and find whatever shade you can.

180

Risking it all to settle a physics debate?

181

It feels makeshift, I'm not going to lie.

182

Time to wear a crash helmet and trust in the engineering.

183

Investigating a public health crisis?

184

If it weren't so dangerous, it'd be a fun activity to do.

185

Well, it might be time for a full hazmat and a respirator.

186

What about online scams?

187

Well, that's easy.

188

Use NorVPN's anti -bars.

189

It's like a hazmat suit for the internet.

190

NordVPN is preventive, and it works to block scams and phishing attempts before they happen.

191

The anti -malware functions proactively.

192

It scans downloading files and removes them if they're dangerous.

193

And while most VPNs don't protect you against fake web stores, NordVPN's next -gen antivirus does.

194

It's all built right into the NordVPN app, giving you all -in -one digital security in just one tap.

195

So go big on your online protection with NordVPN's next -gen antivirus.

196

Just head to nordvpn .com slash veritasium or click the link in the description for an exclusive deal and four months extra.

197

It's completely risk -free with their 30 -day money -back guarantee.

198

I want to thank NordVPN for sponsoring this video, and now back to you, Gregor.

199

This is the biggest vertical separation ever attempted using high -precision clocks.

200

An experiment at altitude means contending with lightning storms, hail, and snow, even the local wildlife.

201

And this short summer weather window means they only have a few weeks to do it.

202

So we'll go into the tent here so we've got a couple of heaters

203

that keep the temperature a little bit more stable and it also keeps out this kind of invasive moth.

204

They get into the observatory there can be tons of them.

205

Anyways the tent does a nice job of keeping them off of the the lasers as well.

206

And is this this is everything?

207

This is really the same as what we were looking at before just on a little bit smaller scale.

208

So we've got down on this end is that

209

that hot oven where we have the atterbium atoms

210

that form the beam that travels down to the main chamber

211

and then some of the lasers that introduce the different colors for atomic manipulation.

212

But at the lab you had a pretty extensive optical bench building up all these lasers.

213

Is that all here?

214

Yep, that's all here.

215

Some of it is tucked away below and on this adjacent rack.

216

It's all here.

217

That's incredible.

218

The mountain clock has to be compared against the one running down in the lab.

219

The problem is, how do you get the clocks to communicate with each other?

220

Well, you could run a fiber optic cable all the way down to Boulder,

221

but it turns out the animals in the region would probably chew through it, and the infrastructure just isn't there.

222

So instead, the clock signal is beamed to a rooftop just outside of Denver.

223

But first, it has to travel from the clock in the tent through optical fiber to this box.

224

Comes out of the fiber, it gets into a small beam, and then it gets into a beam expander,

225

gets to a big beam it's about 10 centimeters going out the door.

226

But beams diverge and turbulence makes it wider.

227

So it's about a meter by the time it gets to Denver.

228

What is actually the line of side distance?

229

It is about 80 kilometers.

230

So you're aiming at one meter spotlight, 80 kilometers.

231

So it's an 8 micron core.

232

It's a very small target.

233

Um, so...

234

Wait, the light that you're trying to aim down is going into an 8 micron opening fiber optic cable?

235

Yeah.

236

That's insane.

237

The final part of the journey is made through optical fiber,

238

And the same path is taken in reverse by the signal from the lab clock arriving to the terminal on the mountain.

239

So the two clocks can be compared directly.

240

So we get all the signals going and then we come over to our computer.

241

Right now, we're seeing no light over the link.

242

We're measuring essentially the detector noise.

243

Our detection threshold is this dashed line here.

244

And so what we really want when we lock this up is we want to see this guy hanging out up here.

245

If we hit this find receive button.

246

And then you just see this pop up.

247

Yeah.

248

So that is light over the link.

249

So we've locked in.

250

We've locked in.

251

We found it.

252

With this link up and running, the experiment is finally underway.

253

But there is actually another team who is already looking beyond the mountains.

254

Because to test gravity to even finer scales, eventually a clock like this needs to get into space.

255

Which creates a whole new problem.

256

Because now, instead of hitting a stationary target, you have to hit one that is moving.

257

At the University of Western Australia, one team is trying to solve exactly that.

258

They've designed a system

259

they hope will send optical clock signals from a moving satellite down to the ground in just a few years' time.

260

And after trialling the link on pickup trucks and boats, now they're trying putting it on a helicopter.

261

So why start with a helicopter?

262

Certainly no one's put a clock on a helicopter before.

263

And for these sort of, I think scenarios where we're going to space, people want to see those stepping stones.

264

It's like a clock in a place that no one's ever put an optical clock before.

265

Atomic clocks have been on board satellites for decades, but they're microwave clocks, lower in both frequency and accuracy.

266

And their signals are beamed down using microwaves too.

267

Microwaves have a longer wavelength than visible light, so where a cloudy sky might absorb or scatter an optical signal,

268

microwaves can often still make it through.

269

So it might sound like the way forward is just to use microwave to transfer any signal,

270

but that longer wavelength is actually why it doesn't work for optical clocks.

271

See, to compare two clocks over a link you need to know exactly when the signal arrives,

272

and you work that out by measuring where each wave is in its cycle as it comes in.

273

Fluctuations in the atmosphere distort the signal.

274

Plus, there are all other kinds of noise, even from the equipment that detects it.

275

How strong the signal is compared with that noise is called the signal -to -noise ratio.

276

The more noise there is, the harder it is to work out exactly where each wave is in its cycle.

277

You can only pin it down to within a small fraction of a wave.

278

For a microwave, with its much longer waves, that small fraction of a wave lasts tens of thousands of times longer.

279

So your measurement could be out by tens of thousands of times more.

280

So to keep up with the precision of optical clocks, the signal has to stay at an optical frequency.

281

And that means hitting a moving target with a laser beam.

282

So this is the clock here and then we've got on top, this is our frequency transfer system and our beacon laser source.

283

That beacon laser will run alongside the clock signal as a bigger target for the ground station to track.

284

Everything that we have on the helicopter is completely reciprocal to what we have on the ground.

285

So they also have their own beacon laser that we look for when we're scanning around with our terminal as well.

286

But remember those fluctuations in the atmosphere?

287

Well those have to be accounted for too.

288

If you have lots of pockets of hot air rising from the road or over the city as well,

289

that will take our laser beam that we're trying to send and move it around and introduce a lot of errors.

290

So what we do is we have a very special mirror, we call it a tip -tilt mirror,

291

and what it does is it moves fast enough that it can account for all of those deviation angles that we're seeing.

292

How fast does it move?

293

So it's moving at about 600 hertz, so 600 times a second is the rate that it can move.

294

But yeah, so switching on the clock.

295

When the technical checks are done, the experiment is ready for takeoff.

296

Cocks up and running, let's go!

297

So we've just left Lilani, she's going to get into helicopter now and they're going to take off really soon so we're rushing back to UWA.

298

If it works the two beacons will lock onto each other

299

and the signal from the clock on the helicopter can be sent down and compared with a clock on the ground.

300

So this is the the roof of the physics building here at the University of Western Australia

301

and then Sabrina over here is looking at our local optical terminal so that's just in here.

302

You've been able to recognise a very similar one that was on the helicopter before.

303

Oh yeah look that's it there we can see it already.

304

Watch your heads.

305

Slightly terrifying.

306

Should be about it can you see anything yet?

307

So you've got to go up a fair bit.

308

Can we go more to the right?

309

Okay that should be about it.

310

Yeah got it.

311

You can see that little flash of light that's in through the door here.

312

That'll be the the beacon laser coming in here.

313

Oh okay so that's amazing.

314

But yeah I guess it's not yet well aligned enough to get the the link fully locked.

315

I think the problem is with that it's a bit windy today

316

and trying to have it like hovering it's actually like the least smoothest kind of flight configuration of the helicopter

317

so maybe we kind of get lucky

318

and we get like a little a flash occasionally

319

and we might get a little bit of data but that's not really the ultimate configuration we want to get.

320

How's it looking?

321

I mean we're seeing some sort of stuff moving around.

322

The issue is when we find ourselves spatially we still need to find ourselves spectrally.

323

The lasers can be gigahertz or tens of gigahertz off pretty easily.

324

How come?

325

At optical there's so much extra bandwidth that's available

326

but we still need to be within I don't know five megahertz of each other.

327

So pointing the beams at each other isn't enough.

328

The two lasers also have to be at almost exactly the same frequency.

329

To put that in perspective, a car radio only has to tune to within a fraction of a percent of a station to pick it up.

330

But these lasers have to match within a few parts in a hundred million.

331

So the terminal scans back and forth, hunting for a window thousands of times narrower than the range it's searching.

332

Okay, we've got 20 more minutes of fuel left.

333

Does that include going home time?

334

I don't know.

335

And they proved the system on the ground could find its partner in the sky, even if they only got a few brief locks.

336

It's not enough data yet to properly compare the two clocks, but it's a big step towards future ground satellite transfers.

337

In the end it sounds easy,

338

but all we have to do is make the mounts just track a bit better and just a bit faster and stuff.

339

And that's one thing that we can easily do, you know, with a bit more time and a bit more engineering.

340

Since then they've been up

341

Mount Fuji, testing their transfer system through two back -to -back typhoons.

342

I think our target is just down here.

343

Here's our terminal set up for the day.

344

Beautiful views all around.

345

Absolutely amazing.

346

Their link will help Hidetoshi Kotori's group at Riken

347

and the University of Tokyo do their own test of general relativity in the spring.

348

But there's one final problem, and that's because even if the link is established successfully,

349

there are still 518 trillion oscillations coming through those electronics every second.

350

And it turns out that there is no electronic device in the world that can read out signals this fast.

351

Even some of the fastest transistors can only switch on and off about 10 billion times a second.

352

And that's still 50 ,000 times too slow.

353

So for decades, scientists had a strange problem because they could build an optical atomic clock, they just had no way to accurately measure its signal.

354

What you'd need is some sort of reference to tie it to, at a frequency that you already know exactly.

355

For example, you could start with a signal in the microwave spectrum that was easy and familiar to create,

356

and then multiply its frequency up in stages until it reached the optical range.

357

And then you could find the exact frequency of the light

358

that you want to measure from the optical atomic clock by comparing it against the signal that you generated.

359

Okay, so I have two tuning forks here

360

and they're both at 440 hertz and when I hit them you can hear that they're both at the same frequency.

361

Now I've put a small weight on one of the forks and that is going to change the frequency slightly, so listen to what happens now.

362

You hear that sound?

363

So what you're hearing is a new waveform that is pulsing at the frequency difference between these two forks.

364

It's called a beat note.

365

And the same thing can be done with light.

366

You overlap two lasers of different frequencies and you get a beat note too.

367

And the thing is, Since the frequency difference is so much smaller than the signal that we're trying to find,

368

we can actually read it out using transistors and we can do a simple calculation.

369

The reference frequency that you know plus the beat note would equal the exact frequency of the unknown signal.

370

But there's a problem.

371

The visible spectrum alone spans around 400 ,000 GHz.

372

It's extremely broad and a beat note can only be measured

373

if the two signals are within a few tens of gigahertz of each other.

374

So the chances of your reference signal being close enough to the unknown signal that you're trying to find are really small.

375

What scientists needed wasn't one frequency, but many spread out so that the unknown signal would always sit close to at least one of them.

376

So a reference signal is down here in the microwave part of the spectrum.

377

So let's call that F of R and then our unknown signal is somewhere up here in the optical.

378

So F of optical.

379

So what I need is some sort of ruler

380

that is going to be able to quantify this difference in frequency between my reference signal

381

and my unknown signal of the clock that I'm trying to find.

382

In theory, you could set up a number of lasers to act as the notches of the ruler,

383

but this frequency in microwave and this frequency in optical are very far apart.

384

So if I want to bridge this gap, I would need a lot of lasers.

385

So instead, what would be useful is

386

if I could manipulate the light of just a single laser to produce all of these different frequencies at the same time,

387

something that would span all the way from the microwaves that electronics could count up to the light scientists wanted to measure. In 1994,

388

a German physicist called Theodor Hensch was at a trade show

389

when a demonstration of a new type of laser struck him with an idea.

390

See, for decades, he'd been coming up with different ways to try and measure optical signals.

391

But this particular titanium sapphire laser could generate incredibly short pulses of light, each packed with a vast range of frequencies.

392

Now, on a frequency graph, that light looked like the teeth of a comb.

393

This could finally be the ruler that everyone was searching for.

394

But to make the wide range of frequencies an effective ruler, each frequency needs to be related to the other frequencies,

395

otherwise you can't really predict the pattern.

396

I mean, a ruler is only useful if these notches are equally spaced.

397

So Hensch and his colleagues put the laser to the test.

398

They measured its light and found that the frequencies contained inside were perfectly evenly spaced.

399

This is an optical frequency cone. By 1999, a team in Boulder led by John Hall had engineered this comb into a ruler

400

so wide that it could measure almost any color of light.

401

So now I have a comb with, well, hundreds of thousands of teeth,

402

and some of them are going to be close enough to that unknown signal that I'm trying to find.

403

The comb is emitting its own frequency, so there's going to be a beat note that rings between this.. comb tooth and the unknown signal.

404

So by observing that beat note with a photodiode, we have a formula to calculate the frequency of our unknown optical signal.

405

That's the tooth position number multiplied by the repetition rate plus the frequency of the beat note.

406

And because the repetition rate is locked to our reference signal, every number in that formula is one that electronics can measure.

407

Within a year, frequency combs were reading the first optical atomic clocks.

408

Henschen Hall, alongside Roy Glauber, were awarded the 2005

409

Nobel Prize for this work.

410

On the mountain, each clock signal is being sent over the air using pulses of a frequency cone.

411

General relativity predicts that when you bring those pulses together,

412

the clock in the lab should take ever so slightly slower compared to the clock on the mountain.

413

That is the theory.

414

But what does the counter on the mountain actually say?

415

So that is light over the link.

416

So we've locked in.

417

We're locked in.

418

We found it.

419

So the fact that this is moving, slowly ramping, that's the time output changing because the clocks are running at different rates.

420

So the time offset is slowly ramping and we can see it more or less in real time.

421

Here it goes. If Einstein is right,

422

these two clocks should differ by 2 .885 times 10 to the power of negative 13 seconds every second.

423

This number has been calculated by another group based on measurements of the gravitational field in the lab and on the mountain.

424

And while both teams are working to many more decimal places than this,

425

they're actually keeping those final digits secret from each other until they're ready to compare findings.

426

If the clocks measure a different angle on the slope, well, that's evidence that general relativity might stop working at this level.

427

So a few weeks later, we hopped on a call with the team to check out what the data is saying. Is Einstein still right?

428

I'm going to answer that two ways.

429

The first is a very simple answer, which is yes.

430

Okay.

431

We have no evidence that says no. The second answer is that we're still analyzing the data.

432

So you're down at sort of the 13th digit

433

and a little change at sort of the a millionth of that slope

434

is what you're looking for when you're looking for new physics.

435

So it's a very small change.

436

I mean, it's incredible

437

that you have the sensitivity to look at a millionth of of this slope that is already a trillionth of a second. So, wow.

438

I mean, that's crazy.

439

And are you guys excited?

440

Are you nervous to know that the data is there?

441

You just have to crunch the numbers.

442

Are you sleeping well?

443

You got to kind of whatever it is, put that number out there and whether it agrees with the classical prediction or not,

444

that's a little bit of a nerve -wracking moment.

445

Yeah, I mean it's huge.

446

The best terrestrial test that's been done here on Earth is about at the 100 part per million level.

447

Our hope is

448

that we'll be able to do approaching the 10 part per million level with testing general relativity in a new

449

and deeper way.

450

Have you got any more of these tests planned in?

451

I think the big next step would be to try to for Link to Spice.

452

It'll be a few months before

453

Laura and Andrew's team are ready to share their final results.

454

So we've linked their groups page in the description if you want to follow their progress.

455

I wanted to say a huge thank you to them and the rest of the NIST team and to Sasha,

456

Lilani, and the team in Perth for all their help on this video.

457

And one final thing, you might have noticed that we launched a second channel called InGenius.

458

$72 billion.

459

That's how much money changed hands on prediction markets in September 2026 alone.

460

Their recent episode was about prediction markets and who actually wins on them.

461

Shockingly, it turns out it's just the 0 .1 % at the top.

462

The team scoured three years worth of past trades on Polymarket to find out what really happens on the platform.

463

And it's a really fascinating watch.

464

So if you're interested, I really recommend you check it out.

465

I want to thank you for your support.

466

And of course, as ever, thank you for watching.

467

Thank you.

App downloaden

Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken

AI UitspraakScoor elke zin

IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid

WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op

WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt

Scan QR

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

Zelfde Kanaal

FOR YOU

Aanbevolen Video

508 zinnen

Einstein and the Theory of Relativity | HD |

Daily ConversationUniversity Students

59 zinnen

How Can You Change Somebody's Opinion?

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

182 zinnen

We Let $200 GPT-Pro Think for 7 Days on Unsolved Math

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

147 zinnen

We Traveled Back in Time. Now Physicists Are Angry.

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

58 zinnen

Where is the evidence for God? | Bishop Robert Barron

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

133 zinnen

Has quantum mechanics proved that reality does not exist?

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

215 zinnen

This New Pyramid Theory Explains the Missing Evidence

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

245 zinnen

Oppenheimer Wrote One Letter About Feynman — It Changed His Life

Daily ConversationUniversity Students

41 zinnen

How Einstein changed time forever | Jim Al-Khalili for Big Think

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

530 zinnen

Human Immortality 4K | Can Science Defeat Aging?

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les

Deze spreekles is gebaseerd op de video “No device could prove Einstein wrong... until now”. Deze woorden komen het vaakst terug: clock, frequency, laser, signal, atom. Deze video bevat 344 zinnen en 6029 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 34:23. De spreker praat in een natuurlijk tempo van ongeveer 175 woorden per minuut, dicht bij een alledaags gesprek. Slechts 80% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden, dus de woordenschat is pittig.

Belangrijke woorden in deze video

15 woorden uit de video die het leren waard zijn, met uitspraak en betekenis:

Woord	Uitspraak	Betekenis
clock zelfstandig naamwoord	/klɑk/	teller, kilometerteller
frequency zelfstandig naamwoord	/ˈfɹiːkwənsi/	frequentie
laser zelfstandig naamwoord	/ˈleɪzɚ/	laser
atom zelfstandig naamwoord	/ˈætəm/	atoom
atomic bijvoeglijk naamwoord	/əˈtɑː.mɪk/	atomair
beam zelfstandig naamwoord	/ˈbiːm/	balk, biels
microwave zelfstandig naamwoord	/ˈmaɪkɹoʊˌweɪv/	microgolf
helicopter zelfstandig naamwoord	/ˈheliːˌkɔptə(ɹ)/	helikopter, wentelwiek
accuracy zelfstandig naamwoord	/ˈæk.jɚ.ə.si/	nauwkeurigheid, precisie
ruler zelfstandig naamwoord	/ˈɹulɚ/	meetlat, liniaal
comb zelfstandig naamwoord	/koʊm/	kam
physics zelfstandig naamwoord	/ˈfɪz.ɪks/	natuurkunde, fysica
experiment zelfstandig naamwoord	/ɪkˈspɛɹ.ə.mənt/	experiment, proef
prediction zelfstandig naamwoord	/pɹɪˈdɪkʃən/	voorspelling
absorb werkwoord	/æbˈsɔɹb/	absorberen, (in zich) opnemen

Phrasal verbs die je zult horen

Woord	Uitspraak	Betekenis
turn out werkwoord		uitvallen, resulteren
find out werkwoord		ontdekken, onderzoeken
build up werkwoord		opstapelen
check out werkwoord		onderzoeken
come up with werkwoord		bedenken, verzinnen
go out werkwoord		naar buiten gaan
pop up werkwoord		opduiken, te voorschijn komen
set up werkwoord	/ˌsɛt ˈʌp/	bereiden, voorbereiden

Zinnen om te herhalen

Korte, volledige zinnen uit de video die je in alledaagse gesprekken kunt gebruiken:

That's what quantum mechanics tells us.
The question is, how do you protect yourself in such extreme environments?
We're measuring essentially the detector noise.
Can you see anything yet?
We're seeing some sort of stuff moving around.

Grammatica in deze video

De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:

Structuur	In de video
Voorwaardelijke zinnen if + zin, will/would + werkwoord — een voorwaarde en het gevolg	If it weren't so dangerous, it'd be · If it works the two beacons will lock
Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telt	I've ever seen · have put · has been proven
Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet	has been proven · are simply ignored · is built
Betrekkelijke bijzinnen who / which + zin — extra informatie over een persoon of ding	others, which is · chamber which has · answer, which is

Uitspraak om op te letten

De spreker gebruikt 82 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals you're, we're, they're. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.

De “th”-klanken: tooth /tuθ/, sixth /sɪksθ/, millionth /ˈmɪljənθ/, wavelength /ˈweɪvˌlɛŋ(k)θ/
De klanken “sh” en “zh”: prediction /pɹɪˈdɪkʃən/, measurement /ˈmɛʒ.ə.mənt/, precision /pɹɪˈsɪʒ.ən/, fraction /ˈfɹæk.ʃən/, transition /tɹænˈzɪʃ.ən/
Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: helicopter /ˈheliːˌkɔptə(ɹ)/, accuracy /ˈæk.jɚ.ə.si/, experiment /ɪkˈspɛɹ.ə.mənt/, electronics /ɪˌlɛkˈtɹɑ.nɪks/, observatory /əbˈzɜːvət(ə)ɹi/

Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:

Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: microwave /ˈmaɪkɹoʊˌweɪv/, node /noʊd/, absorb /æbˈsɔɹb/, bend /bɛnd/, alongside /əˌlɔŋˈsaɪd/
/æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: atom /ˈætəm/, gravity /ˈɡɹævɪti/, accuracy /ˈæk.jɚ.ə.si/, absorb /æbˈsɔɹb/, fraction /ˈfɹæk.ʃən/
/g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: gravity /ˈɡɹævɪti/, magnitude /ˈmæɡnɪtjuːd/, configuration /kənˌfɪɡ.əˈɹeɪ̯.ʃən/, electromagnetic /ɪˌlɛk.tɹoʊ.mæɡˈnɛ.tɪk/, ignore /ɪɡˈnɔː/

Zo oefen je met deze video

Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als clock, frequency, laser.

Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?

Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.

Shadowing-techniek: lees de volledige stap-voor-stap-gids →

Shadowing Practice: No device could prove Einstein wrong... until now - Learn English Speaking with Video

Kies een oefenmodus

App downloaden

White holes and wormholes are probably real. Here's why.

Something is jamming GPS over Europe. Here's what we found

Why It Was Almost Impossible to Make the Blue LED

You've (Likely) Been Playing The Game Of Life Wrong

We're trying something new...

How does light 'know' the shortest path?

Why Cold Drinks Were Deadly Before 1914

Exposing The Flaw In Our Phone System

Our Greatest Delusion

The Most Controversial Problem in Philosophy

We've Been Using The Wrong Science In Court For 50 years

Explaining Pi With Pizza

5 Fun Physics Phenomena

The Absurd Engineering Behind the Internet

The Most Misunderstood Concept in Physics

Falling ladders - why does this happen?

How a slinky falls in slow motion #shorts

We're 99.9% sure this pattern is true, but no one can prove it

What is the secret of a good life? Lessons from the longest study on happiness

How An Infinite Hotel Ran Out Of Room

Einstein and the Theory of Relativity | HD |

How Can You Change Somebody's Opinion?

We Let $200 GPT-Pro Think for 7 Days on Unsolved Math

We Traveled Back in Time. Now Physicists Are Angry.

Where is the evidence for God? | Bishop Robert Barron

Has quantum mechanics proved that reality does not exist?

This New Pyramid Theory Explains the Missing Evidence

Oppenheimer Wrote One Letter About Feynman — It Changed His Life

How Einstein changed time forever | Jim Al-Khalili for Big Think

Human Immortality 4K | Can Science Defeat Aging?

Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les

Belangrijke woorden in deze video

Phrasal verbs die je zult horen

Zinnen om te herhalen

Grammatica in deze video

Uitspraak om op te letten

Zo oefen je met deze video

Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?