跟读练习: Statistical Thinking in Science: Crash Course Scientific Thinking #2 - 通过视频学习英语口语

正在创建课程...
1
I am going to die, eventually.
2
Which is pretty important to me personally, so I'd like to know roughly at what age I am most likely to die.
3
You might guess something like 70, which, based on a national dataset,
4
was the average age of death in the US for men who died between 2018 and 2023.
5
But it might be that 79 is the more accurate answer, which is an extra 9 years.
6
So how can I make sure I'm using the best number to answer my question?
7
stats really tell me when I might die?
8
And is there a way to look at these numbers and not have an existential crisis?
9
Hi, I'm Hank Green, and this is Crash Course Scientific Thinking.
10
Do not worry, I'm not going to teach you how to do statistics today.
11
We have a whole other course about that.
12
What we're talking about here is how to make sense of the stats you encounter in your everyday life.
13
Statistics are vital for so much of what goes on around us, from designing video games to creating impactful government health policies.
14
But statistics can be misleading.
15
It's not because the numbers are lying.
16
It's that if we don't understand how the numbers are being used, we might get the wrong impression about their meaning.
17
Scientists use statistics to understand data, but when they're looking at those numbers, they have all of the context that goes along with them.
18
By the time these stats are reported on in the news, they often lose some of that context.
19
Which can have big impacts on the ways that we see the world as consumers of science news.
20
Scientists rely on numbers to build knowledge.
21
But since they can't measure every person, they use samples.
22
Smaller groups they can measure to better understand a larger group.
23
Which means there's always some uncertainty.
24
So while stats could never tell me, Hank Green, exactly when I will die, they can tell me when a person like me is most likely to die.
25
So what is the typical age of death for an American man?
26
Well, when it comes to statistics, there's a few different ways of determining what's typical.
27
One of the most common is to find the mean, or average, the sum of all the numbers in a sample divided by how many numbers are in that sample.
28
That's where we get the first number from.
29
Based on a large sample of residents who died between 2018 and 2023, the average or mean age of death of a man in the US is 70.
30
But that mean is dragged down by people who died way younger than 70, even though there are fewer of them.
31
So maybe I don't actually want the average.
32
Maybe instead I want to know the most common age of death, or the mode.
33
That answer is actually way different from the mean.
34
The mode is the number that shows up the most in the data, which is where we get 79 from.
35
But actually, most of the numbers in the sample are to the left of the mode, so it's actually more likely that I'd land on one of the numbers under 79 than
36
that I'd land squarely on or after 79.
37
So say then I want to find an age somewhat close to the average age when someone like me would die.
38
I can look at the numbers in the graph and find the standard deviation, which tells me how spread out the other points in the sample are from the mean,
39
which in turn can help me figure out how typical that number really is.
40
If the standard deviation is small, that tells me most people in the sample are dying at ages pretty close to the average age.
41
Another number that might be helpful is the median, or the point right in the middle of the group, where an equal number of US men die before and after.
42
And that would be 73, still relatively close to 70 and 79, but different enough to matter.
43
Because the median is always the number directly in the middle of the dataset, it is less likely to be skewed one way or the other the way a mean might be.
44
So it might tell me way more about when American men tend to die.
45
Though of course, it still cannot tell me when I'll die.
46
The point is, averages like mean, median, and mode are different ways of telling you what might be typical.
47
But they're way more useful when you understand how each one operates differently.
48
And they're even more useful when combined with the standard deviation, which tells us how typical typical really is.
49
There's always a degree of uncertainty when it comes to statistics.
50
So another useful question is, okay, but how certain are we of these stats?
51
For a stat to really mean anything, I need to know how much confidence to have in it.
52
How likely is it that if I ran the numbers again, I'd get those same results?
53
For that, I'd need to calculate a confidence interval, or a range of numbers that I can expect a result to fall within a certain percentage of the time.
54
A 95% confidence interval means that if scientists repeated the study 100 times with new samples,
55
the statistic they're measuring would fall in that range about 95 times.
56
It shows how much that number might vary and how much trust can be put into it.
57
A stat with a high confidence interval is quite predictive, but it is not perfect.
58
So when encountering statistics in the real world, it's good to remember that every stat actually has two pieces.
59
First, the number.
60
And second, how precisely scientists know that number.
61
And it is way better to be roughly right than precisely wrong.
62
Hold on for a moment, I'm being told that we have a special guest on the way.
63
It sounds like it's time for some sage advice.
64
Hi, Hank.
65
Did you know that women also die?
66
Yes, I did sadly know that.
67
Well, you should talk about dudes a lot.
68
For example, consider this updated birth control pill.
69
According to the news, it raised the risk of developing deadly blood clots by 100 percent!
70
That's definitely a big statistic.
71
It sounds like it, right?
72
With the old pill, one in 7,000 people were at risk of developing blood clots.
73
With the new pill, the risk doubled.
74
Do you know what it became?
75
Yeah, if it doubled, I guess it went from one to two.
76
What a great guess!
77
It sounds like a lot when someone says risk has increased by 100%, but that's just what scientists call the relative risk,
78
or how much the likelihood of something happening gets bigger or smaller relative to something else.
79
Which can be helpful to know, but it doesn't tell us the whole story.
80
For that, we need the absolute risk, or the number of people actually experiencing an event in relation to the population at risk.
81
The absolute risk stayed relatively low.
82
Right?
83
It increased to 2 in 7,000.
84
Still important, but people need that context you talked about earlier to make informed decisions.
85
At the time, though, a lot of people only learned about this risk in relative terms through the news.
86
So people switched to less effective pregnancy prevention methods.
87
And you know what poses a higher risk of life-threatening blood clots than the birth control pill?
88
Pregnancy!
89
So the more we understand numbers in context, the better we'll be at making informed decisions for our lives.
90
And that's been today's Sage Advice.
91
Thanks, Sage.
92
Sage is correct.
93
Understanding the difference between absolute risk and relative risk can help us make sense of
94
so many of the stats we encounter in our daily lives.
95
Like, how great is my risk of developing cancer if I go to the beach every day and don't wear sunscreen?
96
Which actually brings me to my next point.
97
Scientists often analyze relationships in data, like the relationship between sunscreen and skin cancer.
98
These are known as correlations.
99
A correlation is a relationship between two or more variables, which are basically anything that can be measured or counted.
100
A correlation between two variables can be loose or it can be tight, which we quantify with their r-value.
101
It's a number from negative one to one that shows how tightly two things move together.
102
One means a perfect match, negative one means perfect opposite, and zero means no connection.
103
The simplest kind of correlation is linear between just two variables.
104
A correlation can be negative, meaning one variable gets smaller as the other gets bigger.
105
Like, for example, how higher rates of wearing sunscreen correlate to lower rates of skin cancer.
106
Or it can be positive, like if, say, higher rates of ice cream sales correlate to higher rates of shark attacks.
107
You might have heard the saying, correlation doesn't equal causation.
108
But there's actually more to it than that.
109
Like in the case of sunscreen, there's a lot of good evidence that wearing it really does lower the risk of cancer.
110
There is a causal link in the correlation.
111
But in the case of shark attacks, it's safe to say that the ice cream isn't causing them.
112
Warm weather is indirectly leading to both.
113
In this case, weather is a confounding variable, or a factor that influences the outcome of a study without being controlled for.
114
These can blur what's actually going on in the data if scientists don't measure and account for them.
115
For example, some studies have shown a positive correlation between personal health and visits to the beach.
116
But it's hard to know if beaches make people healthier, if healthy people are more likely to go to the beach, or if there's some third confounding variable,
117
like the level of wealth, that results in both better health and more beach visits.
118
And even if scientists do a good job of controlling for all these variables, they still have to ask, is it possible this result was just a fluke in our data?
119
In other words, was it statistically significant?
120
Statistical significance means the result is strong enough that it would be surprising to get by random chance.
121
But don't let this phrasing mislead you either.
122
In science, significant doesn't mean important.
123
Like how I say, Doritos are a significant part of my life.
124
That means they're important to me.
125
But that's different from statistical significance.
126
Total significance doesn't even necessarily mean meaningful in the real world.
127
It's more like, it would be surprising to get this result at random, so we should dig deeper.
128
And digging deeper is something we can all do when it comes to statistics.
129
And that begins by understanding that there will always be some uncertainty.
130
Scientists can't possibly measure every version of everything they want to study.
131
But stats can help them measure the uncertainty.
132
And understanding what numbers can and can't tell us about ourselves, each other, and the world can help us not only better understand the way that science works,
133
but also help us make more informed judgments about our own lives. In our next episode,
134
we're going to look at how rare it actually is for a single experiment to change our understanding of science.
135
I'll see you then.
136
This episode of Crash Course Scientific Thinking was produced in partnership with HHMI Bio interactive, bringing real science stories to thousands of high school and undergrad life science classrooms.
137
If you're a teacher, visit their website for resources that explore the topics we discussed in this video today.
138
Thank you.

為什麼用這支影片練口說?

這支探討統計思維的影片,語速適中且內容貼近生活,非常適合做「shadow speak」練習。影片中Hank Green用淺顯的例子解釋統計概念,對話感強,能幫你熟悉學術用語與日常表達的結合。練習時不僅能提升口語流利度,還能累積科學領域的詞彙,對「雅思口语练习」也很有幫助。透過模仿他的語調和節奏,你能更自然地掌握英語表達的邏輯,輕鬆應對各種話題。

語法與表達精析

  • 「It's not because... It's that...」:用於解釋原因,強調重點。例如影片中「不是數字在說謊,而是我們不懂如何運用數字」,這個結構能讓表達更有層次,適合在論述中使用。
  • 「which means...」:引出結果或解釋。如「科學家使用樣本,這意味著永遠存在不確定性」,簡潔地連接前後文,是口語中常用的銜接詞。
  • 「So how can I...?」:提出問題引導思考。影片開頭連續發問,增加互動感。在口說中適當使用疑問句,能讓對話更生動。

發音易錯點提醒

練習「shadow speech」時,要注意這些詞的發音:

  • statistics:重音在第二個音節,不要讀成「sta-TIS-tics」。
  • median:尾音是「n」不是「m」,避免發成「mediam」。
  • uncertainty:中間的「t」要輕讀,連貫發音為「un-SER-tn-tee」。

多聽幾遍影片,模仿Hank的輕重音和節奏,你會發現這些難點其實不難克服。記得,「shadowing site」上的練習貴在堅持,每天10分鐘,口語進步看得到!

视频中的语法

说话人最常用的结构,并附上视频中的原话:

结构视频中的用法
被动语态 be + 过去分词 — 强调发生了什么,而不是谁做的are reported · is dragged · be skewed
定语从句 who / which + 从句 — 补充说明人或事物men who died · answer, which is · people who died
现在完成时 have/has + 过去分词 — 过去发生但与现在仍有关联的事has increased · have shown

什么是跟读法?

跟读法 (Shadowing) 是一种有科学依据的语言学习技巧,最初开发用于专业口译员的培训,并由多语言者Alexander Arguelles博士普及。这个方法简单而强大:您在听英语母语原声的同时立即大声重复——就像是一个延迟1-2秒紧跟说话者的影子。与被动听力或语法练习不同,跟读法强迫您的大脑和口腔肌肉同时处理并模仿真实的讲话模式。研究表明它能显着提高发音准确性,语调,节奏,连读,听力理解和口语流利度——使其成为雅思口语备考和真实英语交流最有效的方法之一。

影子跟读法: 阅读完整分步指南 →