Shadowing-Übung: MinuteEarth Explains: Microbes - Englisch Sprechen Lernen mit Video

Hi, I'm Lisa.

I'm an illustrator at MinuteEarth, but I'm also a microbiologist.

I'm absolutely fascinated by the invisible world all around us and how it influences our lives.

So I'm going to take you on a tour of some of my favorite MinuteEarth videos about the microbial world.

Some are good, some are bad, and some are really tasty.

Some of our favorite foods are closer to this than this.

That's because coffee, bread, cheese, beer, even chocolate are all home to millions of microbes.

In fact, these foods only acquire the tastes, smells, and textures we love because of tiny bacteria and fungi.

The vast majority of microbes, about 99%, are actually quite harmless to humans, but the other 1% are nasty enough that our ancestors,

and the ancestors of various other mammals and birds, evolved a natural repulsion to stuff that might harbor nasty germs.

In general, we think rotten stuff looks and smells disgusting, which, considering what's at stake, isn't overly cautious.

Fortunately, if friendly microbes get to our food first, they can keep the bad guys at bay.

Meat left out on the counter provides the perfect conditions for pathogens to flourish.

It's warm, moist, and protein-rich, just like our bodies.

But with some micromanagement, adding lots of salt, for instance, we can help harmless, salt-tolerant microbes outcompete their dangerous but salt-sensitive relatives.

A few unrefrigerated months later, we get salami, rather than salmonelli.

Our ancestors stumbled on this kind of controlled spoilage thousands of years ago, either by lucky accidents or out of serious desperation.

And we humans have been intentionally spoiling food ever since.

Not only to keep our food safe to eat, but also because the microbes we culture can transform it almost magically into awesome deliciousness.

Yeast, for example, gorge on the sugary starch in bread dough, then burp out carbon dioxide that helps give loaves their lift.

In a more exotic transformation, bacteria and fungi take turns munching on piles of cacao, mellowing out bitter polyphenols and helping create the complex and delicious taste of chocolate.

And deep in cheese caves, mold spores populate small holes and cracks in soon-to-be-blue cheese, digesting big protein and fat molecules into a host of smaller aromatic

and flavor compounds that give the final product its smoothness and rich, funky flavor.

But to some, stinky cheese is about as appetizing as licking someone's toes.

isn't that far off, since the bacteria that make some cheeses super stinky are the same ones that cause foot odor.

Yum?

Even so, these flavors tend to grow on us, not just literally, but also figuratively.

The more we're exposed to particular microbial funks, which can even start in the womb, the more we tend to like them.

As a result, people around the world have some very different ideas about how to microbify foods, but every culinary culture involves fermentation in one way or another.

If we didn't let food spoil just a little bit, we'd have no sauerkraut, soy sauce, pickles, or prosciutto.

Not to mention kefir, kimchi, kombucha, kumis, katsuobushi, and plenty of other delicacies that don't start with kei.

What's more, spoiled food may well have changed far more than our tastes.

Historical evidence suggests that when our ancestors gave up their wandering ways and settled down to grow grain, it was likely for love of either bread or beer.

Whatever the case, one thing is clear.

Without the help of friendly fermenting microbes, we humans would be terribly uncultured.

After our lovely microbe-fueled coffee, let's take a walk in the forest.

I love the way the forest smells.

And if you are smelling this scent called petrichor, what you're really smelling is a tiny compound called jasmine that's produced by gazillions of bacteria.

These all live in the soil.

A place that I would consider alive.

Here's a bear.

We probably agree that the bear is alive, but how about the soil it's sitting on?

That definitely isn't a living thing, right?

It doesn't do a lot of the key things living things do, like moving and reproducing.

But ask scientists whether soil is alive, and the answer more often than not is yes.

What's going on?

Welcome to MinuteEarth.

Soil actually has a lot more in common with a bear and all other living things than you might think.

Just like all the stuff that makes up the bear, living stuff, dead stuff, minerals,

air, and water are constantly working together and sustaining each other so the bear can keep doing its berry things,

soil is also made up of a system of living stuff, dead stuff, minerals, air, and water.

That's right, these things don't just exist in soil, they are the soil, and they're constantly working together as a dynamic self-regulating system.

You might call it a living system.

Then there's the fact that living things interact with their surroundings in all sorts of ways.

A bear, for instance, gobbles up resources from its habitat and spreads nutrients around.

And soil, too, is a dynamic link in its ecosystem.

Its air-filled pores help regulate a fluctuating water flow.

Soil helps transform an ecosystem's dead stuff into easily accessible nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, and carbon that other life needs.

And it serves as a storehouse for extra nutrients until they're required.

But maybe the most compelling argument for soil being alive is that it can die.

Like a bear, soil can lose its ability to carry out all its internal processes and external interactions.

Like, if soil's air-filled pores get too smashed, it starts losing its ability to hold water, leading to floods and erosion.

If certain nutrients get depleted, soil loses its ability to support life.

And soil that can't support life can't support us.

It can't grow the food we need to stay alive, or store the carbon needed to stave off climate change.

So whether or not you actually believe soil is alive, it's useful to think about it as being alive, since that can help us understand how soil functions as a complex,

dynamic system, and how it can change over time, especially as a result of our actions.

What's more, it gives us a vocabulary to talk about those changes.

In fact, it can be helpful to think

and talk about all sorts of maybe not technically living things from the ocean to the economy as having living properties.

In the end, that may help us ensure these things can stay alive and that we can stay alive too.

Some of the most obvious living things in the soil are mushrooms.

We can see their fruiting bodies as we walk around, but that's only the tip of the fungi-sberg.

Nailed it.

Underneath their fruiting bodies is a vast network, and that network is at war.

A long time ago, almost all forest mushrooms used to feed on decomposing stuff on the forest floor.

You could say they were death eaters.

But over the past few million years, a bunch of different species from different parts of the mushroom kingdom have defected and evolved a new strategy.

And now, a mushroom civil war is raging.

It's the death eaters versus the sap suckers.

Hi, I'm David and this is MinuteEarth.

Instead of relying on dead stuff for food, the sap suckers have struck up an alliance with trees.

These mushrooms grow long, thin tendrils that wind together and hook into a tree's roots, extending the tree's reach underground and helping them grab even more nutrients and water.

In exchange, the mushrooms get to tap into the tree's delicious sugary sap.

That's why we're calling them sap suckers.

If you're a mushroom fan, you're probably already familiar with sap suckers because their sugary diet makes them great for eating.

But before they make it onto our plate, they're in conflict with the death eaters.

The two side strategies are so different that it seems like they'd have little reason to compete.

But there's one critical resource that sap suckers don't get from their alliance with trees.

Nitrogen, which is left over when stuff decomposes.

It turns out that all mushrooms need nitrogen to form proteins and other critical molecules, so sapsuckers have to search for nitrogen in the surrounding soil, setting up a battle.

Since death eaters aren't tied to trees and spread their feelers out everywhere, they're often the first to encounter nitrogen, and they use their specialized decomposing enzymes to quickly break it down

and hoard it before the sapsuckers can grab much at all.

Sapsuckers who can't get enough nitrogen die, and to add insult to injury, death eaters are happy to feast on the corpses of any sapsuckers who don't make it.

The sapsuckers, though, have some tricks under their caps.

They send out sneaky, straw-like tendrils to siphon the hoarded nitrogen away from the Death Eaters.

And some sapsuckers have developed some nifty chemical weapons.

Black truffles, for example, can produce a toxin strong enough to kill other nearby mushrooms.

And these sapsucker strategies are working to outmaneuver the Death Eaters.

100

Sapsuckers now dominate more than two-thirds of forests worldwide.

101

That's actually been good for the forests, since sapsuckers supercharge trees' ability to grow big and survive droughts, which is good for us humans.

102

dominated by sapsuckers are 20% better at removing planet warming carbon from the air than those controlled by death eaters.

103

But humans might be inadvertently helping out the death eaters.

104

The huge amounts of nitrogen we use to grow food ends up seeping into nearby forests, where death eaters are able to quickly find it and use it, which helps supercharge their growth.

105

And the pollution we release into the air is harming the trees with which the sapsuckers partner, preventing them from thriving.

106

So while the sapsuckers are winning, the death eaters have the momentum, at least for now.

107

In other words, it's still not clear which side, if any, will win the fungal rumble in the jungle.

108

Fungi don't just influence the ground where they live.

109

Their almost invisible spores also have huge influences up in the sky.

110

If you've ever come across a mushroom like this one, it may not surprise you that mushrooms are the reproductive organs of fungi.

111

In a single day, one mushroom can catapult billions of tiny spores into the air.

112

And not only do these spores help seed baby fungi, they also help seed clouds.

113

That's because, in order to form clouds, moisture in the air needs microscopic particles to glom onto, like airborne dust, sea salt, or pollution.

114

But in places with lots of life, rainmaking particles are often biological in origin, like bacteria, pollen, plant fragments, and spores from mushrooms.

115

In fact, Earth has so many mushrooms intent on reproducing

116

that there are a billion spores above every square meter of its surface.

117

Many of these spores drift high up into the atmosphere, where they provide a scaffolding for water to condense onto, seeding rain droplets and ice crystals and resulting in literal mushroom clouds.

118

Small things can influence some of the biggest systems on Earth.

119

And it turns out that some of the chemicals produced by bacteria

120

and fungi that they use to protect themselves have a massive impact on us humans.

121

For every 10 medications used by humans, 7 contain chemical compounds that originally came from the natural world,

122

mostly from bacteria, fungi, and plants.

123

That's because these unassuming organisms are masters of chemical warfare.

124

Unlike more mobile creatures, which can flee when they're threatened, plants, fungi, and bacteria are more or less stuck.

125

So they've evolved machinery that makes specialized chemical weapons as defense against threats, both from predators and from each other.

126

The battle plays out everywhere, on the tops of mountains, bottoms of oceans, and even under our feet.

127

There soil bacteria looking to deter hungry worms produce compounds that interfere with invertebrates nerve impulses.

128

Other dirt-dwelling bacteria fend off fungi by churning out a chemical that makes fungal cells leaky, causing an oozy death.

129

In exchange, one group of fungi create a compound that breaks down the cell walls of their bacterial nemeses.

130

We humans have co-opted all of these compounds for our own use.

131

You've probably taken the medicine known as penicillin to treat a bacterial infection.

132

And if you, or more likely your pet, has had a brush with parasitic worms, you may have used a drug from the avermectin family.

133

If you've gotten a serious fungal infection, doctors probably treated you with amphotericin.

134

These co-opted drugs are some of the best pathogen-fighting drugs on the market, which stands to reason.

135

Nature is essentially doing drug research and development all the time.

136

And while nature's R&D is simply a series of blind experiments that don't always end up successful, enough of these experiments have happened all over the planet over

137

billions of years to result in an incredible range of effective weapons.

138

And pathogen-fighting drugs derived from nature are just the beginning.

139

We have found painkillers in poppies and willow trees, and eczema treatment in bacteria, anti-cancer medicine in pacific youths,

140

cholesterol drugs in fungi, asthma medication from the ephedra plant and many, many others.

141

What's more, there are so many organisms out there that we haven't even identified, much less put to pharmaceutical use.

142

One teaspoon of soil can contain tens of thousands of species, most of which are unknown to science, each pumping out dozens of defensive compounds that might,

143

one day, end up in your chemical arsenal.

144

So yes, microbes produce many of the compounds that we use for medicine, but one particular microbe that used to be incredibly helpful for us has now turned to the dark side.

145

Hi, this is Julian from MinuteEarth.

146

Three billion years ago, the land was lifeless, and the air oxygen-free but rich in CO2.

147

The oceans were hot and loaded with nitrogen and phosphorus, and aquatic microbes called cyanobacteria were loving it.

148

These microbes would later turn out to be our enemies, but at this point in time, humans didn't exist yet.

149

In fact, cyanobacteria actually helped make our existence possible in the first place.

150

But back to early life on Earth.

151

In addition to being heat tolerant, the cyanobacteria grew in thin mats that were good at soaking up light and nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus,

152

and built nasty toxins to poison their competitors.

153

And in one of the most profound steps in all of evolution, they figured out how to combine carbon dioxide with water to make tasty sugar, a process called photosynthesis.

154

But that fancy new photosynthesis also happened to release oxygen, which was poisonous to organisms that had evolved under oxygen-free conditions,

155

which meant pretty much all life on Earth at that time, including most of the cyanobacteria themselves.

156

But over time, the surviving cyanobacteria evolved to not just tolerate oxygen, but to use it, with a sort of reversal of photosynthesis,

157

which we now call aerobic respiration.

158

This helped cyanobacteria grow to dominate the Earth's oceans for another billion years.

159

Eventually though, as the Earth began to cool and nutrient supplies got used up, some algae well adapted to those conditions also stole cyanobacteria's metabolic secrets.

160

The algae outcompeted cyanobacteria, pushing them into the shadows across much of Earth's waters for the next billion years or so.

161

This long interval also saw the evolution of more complicated lifeforms, including oxygen breathers like us, and we have held center stage ever since.

162

But our success today is now making things awesome again for cyanobacteria.

163

We've done this by pumping CO2 into the air, which has warmed the atmosphere and oceans, cyanobacteria like.

164

Also, because we over-fertilize our farm fields, the rain washes a lot of that fertilizer into rivers and oceans,

165

providing a level of delicious nutrients that cyanobacteria haven't seen for perhaps billions of years.

166

And that's bad for us, because these heat-loving, nutrient-gobbling microbes are once again forming sludgy,

167

gross-smelling mats that release nasty toxins that keep their algal competitors at bay but also make animals and people sick.

168

And since cyanobacteria live short lives and die in large groups, floating mats of their dead bodies serve as food for oxygen

169

breathing decomposers who temporarily use up all of the available oxygen in the water, killing fish, shrimp, insects and plants in sometimes dangerously massive dead zones.

170

To keep cyanobacteria at bay, we need to stop warming the planet, and to farm in a way that doesn't send nutrients into waterways.

171

Until we do, the little creatures that first gave us oxygen are going to keep on blooming, dying and turning our oceans and lakes to the dark side.

172

OK, so some microbes are good and some are bad.

173

And some are like history teachers.

174

These small single cell forums have helped us figure out how

175

the temperatures on Earth has changed over the past half a billion years.

176

Let's see the popular T-Rex do that.

177

Hi, this is Emily from MinuteEarth.

178

Each of these seashells is in fact really, really tiny, because each was once home to a tiny single-celled marine life form called a foram.

179

Though they don't have eyes or brains or limbs,

180

forams somehow manage to pull ingredients from seawater and stack them together into houses made out of the mineral calcium carbonate.

181

Even cooler, each little house ends up with a number written into it

182

that tells us how much ice and snow there is on Earth.

183

That's right, a single-celled sea creature knows how much combined snow

184

and ice there is on all the mountain tops and ice sheets and glaciers on our entire planet.

185

Crazy, but it's true.

186

Here's how it happens.

187

The number in the forams' shells comes from the two types of oxygen forams pull from seawater.

188

The regular kind, with eight protons and eight neutrons, and the heavy kind, with eight protons and ten neutrons.

189

H2O molecules with regular oxygen are slightly lighter and less sluggish than H2Os with heavy oxygen,

190

So they're more likely to evaporate from the ocean's surface and go gallivanting around in clouds.

191

And since all the ice in the ice sheets comes directly from clouds, the ice sheets act as a kind of storage facility for regular oxygen.

192

The colder the global climate, the more regular oxygen the ice sheets store, and the less is left behind in the oceans.

193

As they build their shells, forams effectively capture the ratio of regular oxygen to heavy oxygen in seawater.

194

And we can read that ratio back to figure out how much ice there is at the poles, and thus what the average global temperature is.

195

Of course, we can also just measure those things directly, but our thermometers and satellites can only tell us what's going on right now.

196

FORAMs, on the other hand, have been recording this data for hundreds of millions of years, and their archives have been slowly piling up on the sea floor.

197

So by drilling down and pulling up a big long core of ancient sediment, we can recover an almost continuous record of how Earth's temperature has gone up

198

and down and up and down and up and down etc over time.

199

In fact, we owe most of what we know about our planet's past climate to these tiny brainless seafarers

200

and their tiny beautiful homes.

201

Whenever I'm at the beach, I love watching the waves mix and churn.

202

And I can't help but wonder what life is like for the smaller things that live at the top of the ocean.

203

How do they evolve?

204

Well, we don't know.

205

This is one of science's biggest mysteries.

206

Let's find out why.

207

One of the biggest mysteries in biology centers, perhaps surprisingly, around one of its smallest organisms, single-celled ocean-dwelling plankton.

208

Specifically, why are there so many different species?

209

Welcome to MinuteEarth.

210

In most instances, when similar species live in the exact same place and compete for the exact same resources,

211

only one species succeeds, and the other ones either go extinct or have to try something different.

212

In California, for example, when almost identical plants known as tarweeds and rosin weeds start growing on the same rocky hillside, the rosin weeds will take over and the tarweeds will die off.

213

And in the American Northeast, different bird species that once competed for the same resources in the same spruce trees now don't.

214

The Cape May Warbler has come to dominate the valuable top of the tree, while other warbler species have had to carve out a different living lower in the tree.

215

In these situations, a tiny little difference, like Rosinweed's marginally quicker growth in shallow soil, gives them a slight advantage again and again and again.

216

It's enough to result in one species coming out on top.

217

These KOs are backed up by math.

218

We've figured out equations that simulate how matchups between similar species will play out.

219

And in almost every case, the models agree that there's going to be a winner, and that winner will take all.

220

Over time, one species will apply its small advantage again and again and again, and become the champion.

221

Planktons seem like they should follow this winner-take-all rule too.

222

After all, most plankton species compete for the same resources within the same surface layer of the ocean.

223

One species should come to dominate, and the other should scram, right?

224

But instead, thousands of very similar plankton species all seem to coexist in relative harmony.

225

What gives?

226

One possibility is that the models are wrong, at least for plankton, because they don't account for the unpredictable conditions in which plankton live.

227

Wind and waves may be mixing up the water enough, and regularly enough, that no one plankton species has enough time to exploit whatever tiny advantage they have, and out-compete their rivals.

228

Perhaps every disturbance simply puts all the competitors back on nearly equal footing, just like when tarweeds and rosin weeds first start growing on that rocky hillside.

229

The second possibility is that the models are right, but we're using them wrong.

230

When scientists collect plankton from the ocean, they often use what's called a plankton net, basically a stocking attached to a bottle.

231

When they pull this contraption through the water, they may actually be sampling several different micrometer-thick microenvironments, each with a slightly different combination of resources.

232

So while it appears that several species of plankton are coexisting peacefully, Perhaps what we're actually seeing is a jumbled up collection of species that,

233

in their natural state, actually dominate their own tiny, just different enough micro-environments.

234

It's as if we counted all the birds in the spruce tree together and said, these trees are shared by many similar species of warblers, without realizing that they specialize in different parts of the tree.

235

Recently though, many researchers have come to favor a third possibility.

236

The model is right, but occasionally spits out something weird.

237

It turns out that when you model five or more species competing for three or more resources, The entire system can occasionally get caught in a chaotic loop and no clear winner ever emerges.

238

It seems like this is the case for certain groups of cave-dwelling bats.

239

Maybe the coexistence of thousands of species of plankton is the result of that chaos too.

240

One thing is for sure, as much as we know about the world, to truly understand its inhabitants, even those as seemingly simple as single-celled sea dwellers,

241

we've got a plankton more to learn.

242

Oof, plankton puns.

243

While we're in the ocean though, let's have a look at why the most famous shipwreck in the world is rapidly disappearing.

244

It turns out that some microorganisms have a taste for luxury metal.

245

The Titanic was once thought to be indestructible, and we all know how that turned out.

246

And now it's dying a second death on the seafloor as it erodes.

247

It's disappearing so quickly that experts predict that by 2050 there will be no sign of it.

248

Meanwhile, this Greek merchant ship, which sank 2400 years ago, is super well preserved.

249

What the wreck is going on here?

250

Hi, I'm Cameron and this is MinuteEarth.

251

There are two main factors that determine how long a shipwreck might last on the seafloor.

252

Now there's a lot to consider, but in general it comes down to what the ship is made of

253

and how much oxygen there is on the seafloor where it sank.

254

For most of seafaring history, ships, both above and below the water, were made mostly of wood.

255

But during the industrial Revolution in the 1840s, people started making ships out of metals, mostly iron and steel, that gave us bigger, stronger ships like the Titanic,

256

the Lusitania, and modern luxury cruise ships.

257

It stands to reason that these big metal ships should outlast the wooden ones, even underwater, and under some conditions,

258

like if there's oxygen around, they do.

259

Warm, shallow, oxygen-filled water tends to be full of animals and microbes searching for organic matter to gobble up.

260

A wooden ship that sinks in these waters is a buffet for these decomposers.

261

They'll start breaking down the wreck almost immediately.

262

Shipworms, which are so named for their incredible ability to burrow holes in wooden ships, can completely break down a wooden shipwreck in as little as two years.

263

That's not the case for a metal ship that sinks in shallow waters, because there aren't any critters there capable of digesting iron or steel.

264

Sure, the metal ship will eventually rust, but in these conditions, it will last tens of times longer than the wooden ship.

265

In deeper, colder waters with less oxygen, the rules are reversed.

266

Wooden ships that sink here just live on.

267

That's because, in the depths, the water has so little oxygen that most organisms, including those wood-chomping decomposers, can't survive.

268

The Black Sea, A particularly oxygen-poor body of water is home to at least

269

60 known immaculately preserved ancient shipwrecks from as far back as the time of ancient Greece.

270

Some are in such good shape that archaeologists can literally read the engravings in their planks.

271

Iron ships that sink in similarly cold, deep water aren't so lucky.

272

That's because, although woodchompers can't survive in these oxygen-poor waters, other, weirder decomposers can.

273

Instead of using oxygen to make their bodies run, these microbes run on iron.

274

They usually get their iron from geologic vents on the seafloor, but when an iron ship like the Titanic reaches their depths, they will happily feast on it.

275

Scientists estimate that by 2050, these iron chompers will have consumed the entire Titanic.

276

In other words, my heart may go on, but this ship will be gone.

277

All the videos we've shown you so far are about microorganisms in their natural environments, everything we know about microorganisms is from laboratory studies in petri dishes,

278

where they don't behave like they would in nature at all.

279

And that's a problem.

280

When I was working as a microbiologist, a day in the lab would go like this.

281

I would mix a powder called nutrient agar with water in a beaker

282

and then chuck it into a fancy oven to make it sterile.

283

I would then pour the warm liquid into little containers called petri dishes, where the liquid would cool and solidify into jello.

284

And once that was done, I would do it All over again. And again. And again.

285

Like a hundred times a day.

286

That's what I spend most of my time doing.

287

And that's because petri dishes are amazing.

288

They're easy to prepare, they stack nicely, and the jello inside them provides the perfect nutrient-filled habitat for well-studied bacteria like E coli to grow on top of.

289

Petri dishes are basically the perfect research tool, but as great as they are, they have a huge drawback.

290

Only a tiny percentage of bacterial species will grow on the Jell-O.

291

The other 98% of them simply refuse to.

292

Hi, I'm Lisa and this is my Newt Earth.

293

E coli are easy to please.

294

I would know, I've grown literally billions of them.

295

In the human gut, they live on warm, smooth surfaces with easy to access nutrients.

296

In the lab, petri dishes can mimic that lifestyle pretty well.

297

But while it's easy to think of bacteria as all really similar, in reality they are a super diverse group of organisms with incredibly different lifestyles.

298

I mean, consider animals for a second.

299

You wouldn't build an aquarium, throw a monkey in it and be surprised that it isn't happy.

300

An aquarium is just too different from a monkey's natural habitat.

301

Similarly, most types of bacteria cannot grow a nutritional jello in a petri dish

302

because it's just too different from their natural environment.

303

For example, these bacteria grow in marine sediment where the bottom layer has sulfur

304

but no oxygen and the top layer has oxygen but no sulfur.

305

So its food is at the bottom and its air is at the top.

306

These bacteria form a vertical conga line where the top one breathes and the bottom one eats.

307

Then they exchange energy in the form of literal electricity.

308

The flat horizontal surface of petri dish jello doesn't allow them to do the the things they need to survive.

309

Some bacteria, like Vibrioficiarii, are really good friends with other organisms.

310

They grow in the light producing organs of the Bobtail squid.

311

It's so cute!

312

The luminescent bacteria help the squid camouflage itself.

313

If you want to study these friendships in the lab, you'll have to actually build an aquarium full of squid to grow together with these bacteria.

314

And some bacteria are parasites that will only grow within living animal cells.

315

But not in a friendly way.

316

This is the case for the bacteria that causes syphilis.

317

Putting a bacteria on a plate of Jell-O is like feeding them candy bars, which does work for some species, but other species, like syphilis, are pickier.

318

They need a constant supply of fresh nutrients like you can only get inside a host cell.

319

And some bacteria grow in environments that we can't replicate because we still don't know enough about them.

320

All organisms need something from their environment, like how the bacteria that live in thermal fans need a ton of heat, while others need high amounts of salt,

321

and still others need blood.

322

These things aren't difficult to provide in petri dishes, but the key is knowing what the little bugs need, which can create a catch-22 situation.

323

We can't figure out what it is that the bacteria specifically needs to grow because we can't study it, because we simply don't know how to grow it.

324

Because of all these difficulties, the vast majority of what we know about bacteria comes from the easy to please E coli that thrive in Petri dishes,

325

which have been a huge boon to microbial science.

326

But at the same time my mind boggles at the fault of all the species we don't know about simply

327

because they don't grow on Petri dishes.

328

But lab techniques evolve and we are now learning more about the world of bacteria by bringing the lab outside, or by bringing some of the outside world inside.

329

One day Petri dishes might even become obsolete, but I will still love them.

330

I mean, look at this jello.

331

It's alive!

332

As you can tell, that last one was personal.

333

I've spent so much time trying to get bacteria to behave in petri dishes.

334

And you know, the more I learn about microorganisms, the more I love them.

335

They play such big roles in human health, climate, and in producing my favorite snacks.

336

Thank you for watching this compilation with me.

337

I hope you love the microbial world a little bit more as well.

338

And you know what?

339

I don't just love the microbial world i also love you thank you for being here

340

and watching this with us and see you again soon

341

and if you're not gone yet this is my plushy

342

collection this is candida that's a fungus that's really bad for you this is cholera that's went through the sea

343

this is a cancer cell that you can turn inside out and then it's healthy health This is syphilis.

📺 Gleicher Kanal

✨ Empfohlenes Video

120 Sätze

What’s Ruining Our Ruins?

IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students

31 Sätze

4 Subject Link 6 C1

IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students

99 Sätze

Why you should ferment your garlic

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

41 Sätze

Micro-Biology: Crash Course History of Science #24

IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students

43 Sätze

Candy Corn In Space

IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students

31 Sätze

Untangled: What's eating our planet?

IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students

64 Sätze

Vol 1 - test 8 - section 4

IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students

96 Sätze

Milk. White Poison or Healthy Drink?

IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students

168 Sätze

The Agricultural Revolution: Crash Course World History #1

IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepCambridge Exam Prep

109 Sätze

How Nuclear Flies Protect You from Flesh-Eating Parasites

IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students

41 Sätze

The Building Blocks of Everything: Matter & its Properties

IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students

Was ist die Shadowing-Technik?

Shadowing ist eine wissenschaftlich fundierte Sprachlerntechnik, die ursprünglich für die professionelle Dolmetscherausbildung entwickelt und durch den Polyglotten Dr. Alexander Arguelles populär gemacht wurde. Die Methode ist einfach aber wirkungsvoll: Du hörst englisches Audio von Muttersprachlern und wiederholst es sofort laut — wie ein Schatten, der dem Sprecher mit nur 1–2 Sekunden Verzögerung folgt. Anders als passives Hören oder Grammatikübungen zwingt Shadowing dein Gehirn und deine Mundmuskulatur, gleichzeitig echte Sprachmuster zu verarbeiten und zu reproduzieren. Studien zeigen, dass es Aussprachegenauigkeit, Intonation, Rhythmus, verbundene Sprache, Hörverständnis und Sprechflüssigkeit signifikant verbessert — was es zu einer der effektivsten Methoden für die IELTS Speaking-Vorbereitung und reale englische Kommunikation macht.

Shadowing-Technik: die vollständige Schritt-für-Schritt-Anleitung lesen →

Shadowing-Übung: MinuteEarth Explains: Microbes - Englisch Sprechen Lernen mit Video

Why Do India And China Have So Many People?

Why Haven't We Domesticated Monkeys?

Where Did Earth's Water Come From?

The Heaviest Part of a Forest Is NOT What You Think

Why Don't Blue Whales Eat Fish?

Why We Faint (When Other Animals Don't)

How To Kill A Volcano

Three Specific Ways AI Could Kill Us All

Why is it Hot Underground?

MinuteEarth Explains: Cats vs Dogs

Why Don't Snakes Poison Themselves?

The Best Dragon (According to Science)

How High Can Birds Fly?

Why Do Rivers Curve?

Why Do We Have More Boys Than Girls?

Why Don't Our Bones Keep Growing Forever?

Could This Thing Really Fly?

There’s Really Only One Way To Die

You've Been Misled About The Water Cycle