शैडोइंग अभ्यास: Are We Living Inside an Alien Control System? - वीडियो के साथ अंग्रेजी बोलना सीखें

अभ्यास मोड चुनें

हर मोड पूरी स्क्रीन का अभ्यास कक्ष खोलता है।

370 वाक्य

यदि वाक्य बहुत छोटे या लंबे हों, तो समायोजित करने के लिए Edit पर क्लिक करें।

Have you ever seen the Netflix show

Dark by any chance?

Oh, yes.

So this is this German show that's very similar to Stranger Things, but I would even venture to say that

Stranger Things might be somewhat derivative of this.

They're both sort of related to Montauk experiments around time travel.

They involve the national labs.

They involve children going missing and nuclear programs and it's really kind of freaky,

spooky stuff, but it connects a lot of dots around the UFO question.

And I've heard that people high up in the government say,

you know, that show basically comports better with our metaphysical understanding of UFOs than just about any other.

And it involves kind of game theory vis -a -vis different timelines.

And the reason I'm connecting it to this is like, some of the timelines are kind of unrendered and then others get rendered

and some people sacrifice themselves in current timelines to save people that they're kind of entangled with in other timelines.

It's sort of very strange.

First of all, I've seen it.

Second of all, it is completely in line with what I argued in Closer Encounters the, you know, tome I wrote on the UFO phenomenon.

Basically, I mean, I recommend to people always, you know, to watch dark, to try to get a better understanding of what kind of,

you know, spatiotemporal oruboros I'm talking about in Closer Encounters,

where human history is non -linear and there are all these feedback loops and retrocausal effects going on.

and essentially that some group of people at some point broke time technologically and that we're dealing with the consequences of that.

The conclusion I reached specifically from researching the close encounter phenomenon when I wrote the book

Closer Encounters and then also looking at it again in terms of intersection of close encounters and afterlife research,

which we can get into in a little bit more, you know, high fidelity in the book The Gnosis.

when I expanded the close encounters analysis to include, you know, afterlife research data and the intersection between near -death experiences,

let's say, and abductions, right?

The sense that I get is that we're dealing with two different types of intelligence.

That we have, on the one hand, archontic controllers who are very much akin to the puppeteers in Plato's cave.

When you say archontic, like the archons and Gnostic belief that control this sort of lower material world.

Yeah, well, Archon just means ruler.

Okay, so it's like, you know, somebody, an overlord, a group of people who are lording over other people and who,

you know, tyrannically and sadistically are manipulating underlings who they're maybe managing as an asset, harvesting and exploiting in a certain way.

Another whole line of research

that I get into in Thenosis This is Robert Monroe's out -of -body experiences

that brought him to the conclusion that we're living on a luge farm, that human beings are being basically farmed

and harvested for a kind of psychic energy that intensifies through anguish

and fear and terror and intense pleasure and ecstasy and so forth, and that basically we're inside of a luge factory.

And, you know, particularly in the transition between death and rebirth, in the afterlife state, humans are sort of harvested for their luge.

How did he gather that?

I think it was his own sort of out -of -body experience.

Yeah, he saw the system.

So if our emotions are resources, it's for certain beings?

What were the beings that were mining us?

These archons.

Yeah.

And he believed, Monroe believed that there was some kind of a demiurge who was,

it's very Gnostic, that there was some kind of a demiurge behind all this

and that the demiurge set up this system and basically trapped us here.

Okay.

And so I think we're dealing with two sources.

One is this Archontic control system where there are these sort

of overlords who've got us penned into a kind of louche farm.

But then on the other hand, I see throughout the various cases of close encounters,

fingerprints or tentacle marks of some other kind of genuinely non -human intelligence.

which you could call a superintelligence, you know, so as not to use the word artificial, right?

Now, Trump is all upset about using artificial intelligence.

He wants to use superintelligence instead, which is kind of funny.

But in a more serious way, there is a legitimate objection to using the word artificial intelligence, because if we're in a computational cosmos,

and in a sense, our world is actually a technological artifact,

then that distinction doesn't make sense anymore between artificial intelligence and a putatively natural intelligence, right?

But for shorthand, a super intelligent AI,

I think could well be behind some of the more bizarre close encounters, the types of encounters that John Keel liked to focus on,

where you have these plasmatic entities, not to even call them objects.

And here, the terminology shift between UFO and UAP is actually valid because these things aren't objects.

They're some kind of, you know, unexplained anomalous phenomena, aerial or from undersea coming into the sky,

transmedium anomalous phenomena that is like, it's of a plasmatic type, like an orb.

And then it can turn into a UFO, but it can also turn from a UFO into a black helicopter.

And people have witnessed these things, these transmogrifications

and people have also witnessed things that look like owls shape -shifting into something else

or being too big to really be owls

and you know telepathically communicating with them or you know mantid beings who

if you go into the the history of folklore about mantids and you know what mantids have symbolized in various,

yeah, folklores, if not mythologies, you see that that's very potent symbolism.

And it was adopted, for example,

by the Surrealists as a signifier for the trickster and a catalyst for the cultivation of higher intelligence and discernment.

But through the use also of deception and the need to cultivate discernment so as to navigate potential deceptions.

I was just with Jacques Vallée, and I was like, if we don't know that much more about UFOs than we did 50 years ago,

at least on the sense -making layer, on the theorizing layer, we have a lot more data and the consensus has sort of shifted.

Are you happy that you kept going?

And he, to your point, said that the UFO field, it's sort of like working out but with a weight suit on.

Like it's sort of, you know, extra stress or pressure that then causes you to grow more.

And so the more you the more you chase it, you know, it's you're the product.

Your growth is the product or something, which is weird because, you know, you want some sort of semantic truth at the end of the road.

But my issue with Jacques Vallée's massive,

you know, magisterial,

decades -long treatment of the UFO phenomenon is that he is trying to basically develop one comprehensive interpretive framework.

And I think there's a danger in conflating this non -human superintelligence that's behind these various transmogrifications and,

you know, shape -shifting manifestations.

There's a danger of conflating that with an archontic control system, which I think is very real.

And actually, what I argue in Closer Encounters is that there's an adversarial relationship between them that these archontic overlords who are,

frankly, I always refer to them as people because they look like people.

And there's no reason to assume they aren't.

And this brings us back to Dark, the TV series

Dark, is that there's a bunch of people at the end of time, as it were, right, who are screwing with human history.

And I think that's the situation we're actually in.

But there's also a non -human intelligence that realizes the value of the human race for the cosmos,

100

that we humans have a tremendous creative potential to contribute to a struggle against entropy on a cosmic scale.

101

And this entity wants to somehow help us to break out of this control system

102

so that our creative potential can be liberated on a cosmic scale.

103

Except that if you if you think about that problem seriously, you realize that it can't come do it for us.

104

That would be disempowering.

105

It might prevent us from being utterly crushed.

106

And I think there are indications of that.

107

Like, for example, I don't think the Renaissance and the Enlightenment would ever have happened if these archons were in total control.

108

And I also don't think it's a coincidence that, you know, as the Renaissance was rising,

109

you had huge UFO battles over cities like Nuremberg that were recorded in block print newspapers at the time.

110

I think there was a power struggle between two sources of the close encounter phenomenon.

111

So your belief is, because you've talked about this before, you have like a rebel angel faction and all these traditions.

112

And then you have, you know, and they're sort of fighting against God, but on behalf of humanity.

113

I think God is a construct.

114

I think God is a, it's a construct developed by the Archontic control system that's meant to psychically subjugate humanity

115

and basically cause people to enter a kind of,

116

you know, sheepish state of obedience and submission to a tyrannical hierarchical system that ought to be questioned, challenged and overthrown.

117

I would say the opposite.

118

I would say God is subversive of human institutional oppressive power.

119

I tell you why I take objection to that.

120

Okay, sure.

121

I think that what you want to call God is the non -human superintelligence,

122

but that entity is not omniscient, nor is it omnipotent.

123

There's no empirical evidence to suggest that.

124

On the contrary, if you look at its modus operandi and the way in which it seems to be introducing cracks into the system,

125

destabilizing power structures, spinning things in a way that weakens the control of the archons,

126

it suggests a powerful but finite intelligence that's working very hard to try to augment human agency.

127

Have you seen Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel?

128

Yeah, I've seen it in person.

129

So you've seen, you know, man and God, Adam and God, you know, touching each other.

130

It's a bi -directional connection.

131

So you reach out and then God reaches back.

132

And so I think it works sort of more like that, where on your own volition,

133

you seek God and then God takes note of you and then it sort of becomes this symbiotic thing.

134

The problem with that framing is that God, as he has appeared, especially in the revealed religions,

135

Judeo -Christianity and Islam, is a horrific, sadistic tyrant and abuser.

136

And I could make this case at great length.

137

I do.

138

I spent a whole chapter on it.

139

That's, I believe, a hundred page long chapter in Closer Encounters called The Shining Stupidity.

140

And the reason I call that has to do with something Charles Fort said.

141

Charles Fort believed this in his 1920s analysis of the close encounter phenomenon.

142

He said, we're property.

143

And what's going on here is akin to the British Raj,

144

where these colonizers have come set up a local elite akin to the people who managed India on behalf of the British.

145

The viceroys.

146

Yeah, the viceroys.

147

And so our elites, like from the Brahmin of the ancient

148

Hindu system onward to like today's

149

World Commerce Corporation, the elites manage this world on behalf of these overlords and we're property.

150

And he goes through the religious scriptures and he is the first one, actually, in modern literature to point to passages in the Bible and say,

151

this is a UFO encounter.

152

And by the way, the belief that's being promulgated here is stupid.

153

It's shiningly stupid.

154

I would say that the material world is full of evil and sort of illusory kind of, you know, temptation and things that,

155

you know, and very oppressive things and power structures that aren't, you know, very, very fair or noble.

156

and then if you think of God as sort of, you know, transcending that and outside of that.

157

And this may be being somewhat of a test where, you know, if we are able to,

158

again, point out that sort of finger and then we get the kind of bi -directional connection

159

and we can sort of pass the test.

160

And it's sort of like, you know, in the Platonic model, we can glimpse the light.

161

I do believe there's a test.

162

I see the test very differently.

163

I think it's an intelligence test and a test of ethos and that the tester is,

164

I argue, in closer encounters and then also actually in my study of Iran, Iranian Leviathan,

165

that the book of Job needs to be sort of read

166

esoterically where the test is actually for you not to be as much of a submissive,

167

basically pathetically obedient person as Job.

168

and to realize that the torments that he's been put through are absolutely unjustified.

169

And that when in the end, God says to Job, you know, your friends are wrong to try to look for a rationale for my actions

170

and to try to identify what it is that you did wrong for me to put you through these trials.

171

I did what I did to you because I can.

172

And if you had the power that I have, you could do it to me.

173

But in fact, I'm the one with the stronger right hand.

174

And it's basically a statement of the will to power.

175

And so I think that the test is to read

176

that book properly to the point where it brings you to want to rebel against

177

that kind of tyranny and to not be spiritually submissive in the way that Job is.

178

So I see the tester as being the non -human

179

superintelligence outside of the control system that produced the revealed religions or that produced the ancient

180

Hindu caste system, and that the finger that reaches out is reaching out toward this sort of like,

181

let's say, valis, this vast living intelligence system, and that the connection there is a connection that expresses itself in rebellions,

182

paradigm shifts, artistic innovations that actually hold the potential for us to transcend the existing large -scale religious belief systems.

183

Well, that's why can't you?

184

It's always alluring whenever I speak to you.

185

I'm like, I'm buying a lot of it.

186

But when you take the book of Job, for example, why can't you just take that at face value?

187

Why can't it just be Lucifer went to God and said, I'm going to test

188

Job through, you know, with all these trials and tribulations that I'm going to put him through.

189

So it was really Lucifer that wanted all of this bad to sort of befall Job.

190

It makes no sense, Jesse.

191

Listen, like what kind of God?

192

Okay, so we're going to accept an omniscient and omnipotent God, right?

193

Mm -hmm.

194

The devil comes to him.

195

Mm -hmm.

196

Ha -Shaytan, right?

197

This Job only worships you because,

198

you know, you've given him such an easy life and blessed him with a wonderful family and property and so forth.

199

Why don't you let me mess him up a bit, you know, and then let's see if he still worships you, right?

200

What kind of an ethical God allows a devil to get away with something like that?

201

It's like a parent that says, okay, learn this lesson on your own.

202

That parent should be put in an institution.

203

That's the most horrendously abusive parent.

204

If you read what's done to Job and to his family and his kids are killed, that's like the parent who,

205

you know, these by proxy Munkhausen -like mothers who should put in a fucking institution.

206

So when you look at specific passages in the New Testament,

207

there are lines that are describing Jesus being picked up by UFOs

208

and ferried around as if he's riding in them like they're a taxi service.

209

I mean, you know.

210

I think there's one passage you're referring to in the book of Acts where he goes up on the cloud.

211

No, there's multiple passages.

212

There's, of course, the famous baptism one, you know, where John the Baptist,

213

right, is baptizing Jesus in the Jordan River and then this basically fixed wing craft comes, which is described as flying akin to a dove.

214

In other words, it doesn't flap its wings.

215

It's a fixed wing craft and it hovers directly over Jesus

216

and then he's pulled up into it and taken off into the desert to be tested.

217

And there's another one where he's been put in the tomb.

218

There are these centurions on guard outside of the tomb and this UFO comes and it deposits these beautiful men

219

in front of the door to the tomb

220

and they roll the rock aside and go in

221

and take Jesus from out of this tomb and he's got like one arm around each of them.

222

They're supporting him.

223

And the centurions witness the three of them basically levitated up into this light.

224

Who do you think these beautiful men are that come out of this?

225

Nordic Arkontic controller.

226

okay so i think that that's part of the control system

227

and the heal to speak to the healing specifically

228

there were various um you know basically pythagorean hellenistic magicians at work in the world at

229

that time who did these kinds of things the most famous of them being apollonius of tiana

230

and we have a whole like two volume book written by philostratus a notable Roman author about Apollonius of Tiana

231

and all the miracles he performed, which are exactly the same type of,

232

you know, exercises of paranormal ability that we see in the case of Jesus, except that this Apollonius is actually teaching a coherent,

233

you know, neo -Pythagorean philosophy rather than this incoherent nonsense we see in the Gospels.

234

I don't know if it's incoherent.

235

It's like, love your man as yourself.

236

You know, love your fellow man.

237

Well, we can leave it to the subjective judgment of the viewers.

238

Fair enough.

239

But I really would recommend, I have a 100 -page chapter in Closer Encounters,

240

analyzing the scriptures, not just Judeo -Christianity, but also, you know, Hindu scriptures.

241

Can I ask you something very simply?

242

Because all of this is so fascinating, and you weave such an eloquent argument here.

243

But I think about neurotic intellectual types

244

And I would probably bucket myself into that category at times

245

You're only very mildly neurotic

246

Only mildly neurotic

247

But you know what I mean?

248

Like people who seek truth on the semantic layer

249

And then I think about God -fearing people who go to church or synagogue or mosque or whatever

250

And they pray to God and they just feel way happier than the former category

251

Yeah, I mean, cattle are also happy until they're slaughtered.

252

Well, I don't know.

253

I don't think that's submissive.

254

I think that it's adhering to or aspiring to things that go beyond the material world.

255

And so I think you're anchoring something on the transcendent.

256

Especially when you look at the history of the persecution of people who cultivated

257

and displayed psychic ability there is an inverse relationship between the cultivation of higher consciousness and the dominance of the Abrahamic religions.

258

Dean Radin studied this at IONS and he found

259

that the witch persecutions and the execution of sorcerers in the Middle Ages was

260

so bad that there is less psychic ability in European populations as compared to other parts of the world

261

because there is a genetic correlate to strong sciability

262

that has to do with a certain part of the brain

263

the the development of the basal ganglia cut a nucleus yeah as an expression of a certain

264

you know um a certain genotype and so they went around

265

and basically round it round rounded up persecuted and exterminated so many adept psychic people who are practitioners of various,

266

you know, magical and occult, including within Christianity.

267

In other words, there would be esoteric systems that developed within the establishment of Christianity.

268

So it's not just the happy people that get slaughtered.

269

It's, you know, it's these people.

270

No, no, no, no, no. Look, the happy people by that,

271

what I meant is that they're in a louche farming system and the slaughter happens after death.

272

In other words, aren't you depriving the archons of the louche if you're just happy and God fearing?

273

isn't the luche explicitly sort of meant to be mining bad vibes

274

and so if you're like one of these happy -go -lucky like i believe in god

275

and you're praying and stuff isn't that well isn't that more adaptive

276

and you're depriving the archons okay first first of all no

277

because there's all kinds of you know small miseries

278

and torments mundane miseries and torments in people's lives

279

that generate plenty of luche and excitements that generate plenty of luche in an otherwise overall happy life of general submissiveness.

280

However, you do have a point insofar as attempting to rebel against such a comprehensive system generates a tremendous amount of energy.

281

And that energy can also be parasitically harvested within a luche farming system.

282

Until and unless the system is defeated and overthrown and dismantled.

283

Okay.

284

So in a way, I think you have a point, but the aim would be to just dismantle the whole loose harvesting system.

285

OK, and that requires a tremendous amount of motivation and energy.

286

Anyway, my point is that, you know, what you're laying out here doesn't make sense in terms of,

287

you know, religion, conventional religious practice as a means of anchoring oneself for the development of higher consciousness and the psychical cultivation,

288

that is not corroborated by the vast historical evidence for mass persecutions and extermination of people who cultivated above average sciability and,

289

you know, which has left a genetic imprint on European populations.

290

So I do think that has historically been this horrible thing where,

291

yeah, shamanic figures or figures who seem to sort of have some transcendent tether to, you know, almost like a different epistemological circuitry,

292

they get persecuted for sure.

293

But I wouldn't say that the sort of God fearing, you know, average people are necessarily the ones persecuting them.

294

It's often these power structures that set themselves up as intermediaries between man and God.

295

Where are the angels to intervene in that?

296

They intervene so many times throughout the course of biblical history right?

297

In very direct ways.

298

I mean, you look at the book of Ezekiel, there are like, I don't know,

299

15, 18 different like UFOs that show up in the book of Ezekiel.

300

People always talk about one or two of them, but there are many.

301

There's constant intervention that's recorded throughout the Bible.

302

Okay.

303

And that history of intervention continues, you know, in the middle ages with a plethora of UFO encounters.

304

It got so bad in the reign of Charlemagne that, you know, edicts were being passed against the tyrants of the air.

305

And so, you know, they seem to be very busy engineering the affairs of this world.

306

You would think if in the name of Jesus Christ, whole towns were being exterminated as they were in the South of France,

307

these angels would have something to say about it.

308

Well, I think the abuses going on are just, it's also sort of removing culpability for just the people.

309

It's the people who they say they're doing it in the name of God, who are just, you know,

310

killing the high side people or whatever that, you know, the they're calling them witches or, you know, psychics or whatever.

311

It's just those people's faults, you know, and it's not it has nothing to do with a higher God.

312

You know, they're saying that they're doing it in the name of that higher God, because there's scripture that justifies that thou

313

Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.

314

Thou shalt not kill.

315

Exactly.

316

Cognitive dissonance.

317

I'm just saying.

318

For a moral system, it's garbage.

319

Yeah, but you consider yourself a Satanist, right?

320

No. I'm a philosopher.

321

A philosopher.

322

Okay, but you're on the side of the rebel angels.

323

Look, it is a romantic and inspiring and catalytic myth,

324

which captivated people like Shelley and Byron.

325

And, you know, I think it's constructive.

326

Ultimately, I have no religious commitment whatsoever.

327

I'm interested in understanding the nature of reality.

328

Me too.

329

And I'm interested in progress and innovation.

330

In other words, my ultimate aim is to contribute to negentropy.

331

Right.

332

So so it's not a neutral search for truth.

333

It's a search for truth that aims to be constructive or productive.

334

On that cheery note, it's always fun to talk to you, Jason.

335

It's really your knowledge is just so, so incredible and the Puharic stuff is just so wild.

336

And I don't know, I learn so much from you every time I speak to you.

337

Some of it not so savory knowledge.

338

It's often forbidden knowledge, but I have an interest in a lot of the same things you do.

339

So it's always fun.

340

And I appreciate you visiting us in Austin.

341

It's been a great pleasure, Jesse.

342

Thank you for the invitation, especially to your studio.

343

Absolutely.

344

It's an honor. so I

345

got back from South America last year with something I couldn't shake.

346

Weeks of it.

347

I kept filming down there.

348

I picked up a bug somewhere along the way, and it just kept going long after it should have stopped.

349

I was in bed for weeks.

350

Ways to well is how it ended.

351

Brigham and his team went at it properly and got me back on my feet.

352

Then I sent them my parents.

353

My dad unfortunately has dementia and they've been treating him.

354

My mom's had vertigo for a long time and they helped her with that.

355

That's the part I find hard to talk about without sounding like an advertisement

356

and they're not paying me to say any of this, so I'll just say it plainly.

357

They looked after my family, and I'm not gonna forget that.

358

But here's what I actually want you to understand about them, because it's bigger than any of those stories.

359

Most of us treat a serious diagnosis like the weather, something that happens to you.

360

But it doesn't have to be that way.

361

Almost everything serious that we end up diagnosed with has been building up for years, and a blood test would have shown it the whole time.

362

Nobody looks because a normal physical checks the same handful of things every year and if they're in range, you're fine.

363

And the range in the American healthcare system is healthy or on the verge of death.

364

Ways to Well looks at all of your information, one blood draw, and they run it for everything.

365

how your body's handling sugar so you see diabetes coming years out, the inflammation that shows up years before heart disease does,

366

your thyroid, your hormones, your vitamins, your stress, every part of you that can quietly go wrong, checked at once.

367

Then a clinician sits down and goes through the whole thing with you and leaves you with a plan.

368

They're very good at fixing people, but what they're actually built for is making sure there's nothing to fix.

369

Go to ways2well .com now.

370

you

ऐप डाउनलोड करें

धाराप्रवाह बोलने के लिए ज़रूरी सब कुछ

AI उच्चारण स्कोरहर वाक्य का स्कोर

IPA अभ्यासहर ध्वनि में महारत

शब्दावलीअपना शब्द भंडार बनाएँ

शब्द गेमखेलते हुए सीखें

QR स्कैन करें

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

FOR YOU

अनुशंसित वीडियो

476 वाक्य

Stuart & Cliffe Knechtle | Do Agnostics Just Want To Have Control? | Give Me an Answer

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

684 वाक्य

The Most Likely Place to Find Aliens

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

251 वाक्य

Things That Are Not What They Seem and the Truth About Life | Advanced Podcast for Conversations

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

31 वाक्य

Exposing the Secrets behind Data Centers 👀🤯

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

इस पाठ की शब्दावली और बोलने के सुझाव

यह स्पीकिंग पाठ वीडियो “Are We Living Inside an Alien Control System?” पर आधारित है। इस वीडियो में शैडोइंग के लिए 370 वाक्य और 4619 शब्द हैं। बोला गया हिस्सा 30:11 लंबा है। वक्ता लगभग 153 शब्द प्रति मिनट की स्वाभाविक गति से बोलता है, जो रोज़मर्रा की बातचीत के करीब है। केवल 80% शब्द अंग्रेज़ी के 3,000 सबसे आम शब्दों में से हैं, इसलिए शब्दावली कठिन है।

इस वीडियो की मुख्य शब्दावली

वीडियो के 15 सीखने लायक शब्द, उच्चारण और अर्थ के साथ:

शब्द	उच्चारण	अर्थ
encounter क्रिया	/ɪnˈkaʊntɚ/	सामना, भेंट
phenomenon संज्ञा	/fəˈnɒm.ɪ.nən/	परिघटना, दृग्विषय
harvest संज्ञा	/ˈhɑɹ.vəst/	फ़सल, उपज
belief संज्ञा	/bɪˈliːf/	विश्वास, धारणा
angel संज्ञा	/ˈeɪ̯n.d͡ʒəl/	फ़रिश्ता, फरिश्ता
artificial विशेषण	/ˌɑː.tɪˈfɪʃ.əl/	कृत्रिम
rebel संज्ञा	/ˈɹɛb.əl/	बाग़ी, बागी
tomb संज्ञा	/tum/	क़ब्र, समाधि
layer संज्ञा	/ˈleɪ̯ɚ/	परत, तह
scripture संज्ञा	/ˈskɹɪpt͡ʃɚ/	धर्मग्रंथ
finger संज्ञा	/ˈfɪŋɡɚ/	उंगली, अंगुल
institution संज्ञा	/ˌɪn.stɪˈtʃuː.ʃən/	रीति, प्रथा
conclusion संज्ञा	/kənˈkluːʒən/	अंतिम
comprehensive विशेषण	/ˌkɑm.pɹəˈhɛn.sɪv/	विस्तृत, व्यापक
genetic विशेषण	/d͡ʒəˈnɛt.ɪk/	अनुवांशिक

वीडियो में आने वाली फ़्रेज़ल वर्ब

शब्द	अर्थ
pick up क्रिया	उठाना
sit down क्रिया	बैठना

दोहराने लायक वाक्य

वीडियो के छोटे, पूरे वाक्य जिन्हें आप रोज़ की बातचीत में इस्तेमाल कर सकते हैं:

First of all, I've seen it.
What were the beings that were mining us?
Are you happy that you kept going?
I do believe there's a test.
Can I ask you something very simply?

इस वीडियो का व्याकरण

वक्ता जिन संरचनाओं का सबसे अधिक प्रयोग करता है, वीडियो के असली शब्दों के साथ:

संरचना	वीडियो में
Present perfect have/has + past participle — बीता हुआ काम जिसका असर अभी भी है	Have you ever seen · I've heard · I've seen
Passive voice be + past participle — ज़ोर इस पर कि क्या होता है, न कि कौन करता है	being basically farmed · was adopted · can be liberated
Relative clauses who / which + उपवाक्य — व्यक्ति या वस्तु के बारे में अतिरिक्त जानकारी	people who are · instead, which is · something, which is

ध्यान देने योग्य उच्चारण

वक्ता 86 बार संक्षिप्त रूपों का प्रयोग करता है, जैसे they're, I'm, you're। इन्हें वैसे ही छोटा बोलें जैसा आप सुनते हैं।

“th” की ध्वनियाँ: overthrow /ˌoʊvɚˈθɹoʊ/, gather /ˈɡæðɚ/
“sh” और “zh” की ध्वनियाँ: artificial /ˌɑː.tɪˈfɪʃ.əl/, cultivation /ˌkʌltɪˈveɪʃən/, institution /ˌɪn.stɪˈtʃuː.ʃən/, conclusion /kənˈkluːʒən/, worship /ˈwɝ.ʃɪp/
लंबे शब्द — बलाघात सही रखें: phenomenon /fəˈnɒm.ɪ.nən/, artificial /ˌɑː.tɪˈfɪʃ.əl/, cultivation /ˌkʌltɪˈveɪʃən/, institution /ˌɪn.stɪˈtʃuː.ʃən/, comprehensive /ˌkɑm.pɹəˈhɛn.sɪv/

हिंदी भाषियों के लिए मुश्किल ध्वनियाँ:

/v/ और /w/ का फ़र्क़ — /v/ में ऊपर के दाँत निचले होंठ को छूते हैं, /w/ में होंठ गोल होते हैं: harvest /ˈhɑɹ.vəst/, involve /ɪnˈvɑlv/, cultivation /ˌkʌltɪˈveɪʃən/, vast /væst/, comprehensive /ˌkɑm.pɹəˈhɛn.sɪv/
/z/ — इसे “ज” (/dʒ/) न बनाएँ: misery /ˈmɪz(ə)ɹi/, cosmic /ˈkɑz.mɪk/, cosmos /ˈkɑzməs/, transition /tɹænˈzɪʃ.ən/, desert /ˈdɛz.ɚt/
शब्द की शुरुआत में s + व्यंजन — पहले “इ” न जोड़ें: scripture /ˈskɹɪpt͡ʃɚ/, slaughter /ˈslɔːtə/

इस वीडियो से अभ्यास कैसे करें

पहले बिना बोले पूरा वीडियो एक बार सुनें और जो शब्द नहीं आते उन्हें लिख लें।
0.75× गति से शुरू करें, एक-एक वाक्य की शैडोइंग करें, और सहज लगने पर सामान्य गति पर लौटें।
अपनी आवाज़ रिकॉर्ड करें और मूल से तुलना करें, ख़ासकर encounter, phenomenon, harvest जैसे शब्दों पर ध्यान दें।

शैडोइंग तकनीक क्या है?

शैडोइंग (Shadowing) एक विज्ञान-समर्थित भाषा सीखने की तकनीक है जो मूल रूप से पेशेवर दुभाषिया प्रशिक्षण के लिए विकसित की गई थी। विधि सरल लेकिन शक्तिशाली है: आप मूल अंग्रेज़ी ऑडियो सुनते हैं और तुरंत इसे ज़ोर से दोहराते हैं — जैसे वक्ता की छाया 1-2 सेकंड की देरी से। शोध से पता चलता है कि यह उच्चारण सटीकता, स्वर, लय, जुड़ी हुई ध्वनियाँ, सुनने की समझ और बोलने की प्रवाहशीलता में काफ़ी सुधार करता है।

शैडोइंग तकनीक: पूरी चरण-दर-चरण गाइड पढ़ें →

शैडोइंग अभ्यास: Are We Living Inside an Alien Control System? - वीडियो के साथ अंग्रेजी बोलना सीखें

अभ्यास मोड चुनें

ऐप डाउनलोड करें

"I Was Inside A UFO." | Area 51 Whistleblower Bob Lazar

The shock of doing nothing | Andrew Holecek

12 Things That Could Destroy Earth

My Joe Rogan Appearance: What I Learned (ft. Young Jamie & Viktor Hovland)

Would You Upload Your Mind?

Supernatural thinking: Your brain’s anti-anxiety mode | Clay Routledge

Did Henry Kissinger Oversee A UFO Crash Retrieval Program?

We Found Galaxies Too Old for the Universe

Stuart & Cliffe Knechtle | Do Agnostics Just Want To Have Control? | Give Me an Answer

The Most Likely Place to Find Aliens

Things That Are Not What They Seem and the Truth About Life | Advanced Podcast for Conversations

Exposing the Secrets behind Data Centers 👀🤯

इस पाठ की शब्दावली और बोलने के सुझाव

इस वीडियो की मुख्य शब्दावली

वीडियो में आने वाली फ़्रेज़ल वर्ब

दोहराने लायक वाक्य

इस वीडियो का व्याकरण

ध्यान देने योग्य उच्चारण

इस वीडियो से अभ्यास कैसे करें

शैडोइंग तकनीक क्या है?