Pratica di Shadowing: How Greed is Destroying FIFA - Impara a parlare inglese con i video
Scegli una modalità di pratica
Ogni modalità apre una sala di pratica a schermo intero.
187 frasi
Se le frasi sono troppo corte o troppo lunghe, clicca su Edit per modificarle.
1
This is the Rueda family.
2
They love soccer, or football.
3
The family attended Mexico's World Cups in 1970 and 1986, but for 2026 they are staying home.
4
Why? FIFA priced them out. In 1994, the cheapest seat at the World Cup final, yes, the final, was $404 when adjusted for inflation.
5
The most expensive? $1,067.
6
Fast forward to today and the cheapest non-resale seat is $2,030.
7
The most expensive $10,990.
8
But the resale market is even crazier, with some tickets going for $2.3 million.
9
All of this will be great for FIFA.
10
They expect to earn $11 billion in revenue from the 2026 tournament, up from $7.5 billion at Qatar in 2022 and $5.36 billion at Russia in 2018.
11
But strangely, this might be terrible for the beautiful game.
12
Something insidious is happening inside of FIFA.
13
I am Kam for 2&20 and this is FIFA: The Actual Winner of the World Cup.
14
Okay. Full disclosure, I love soccer. or football.
15
I love it so much that I won four tickets to the round of 32.
16
And four tickets to the round of 16.
17
Now, I say won because although I got through the lottery, the tickets did not come cheap.
18
Each ticket sent me back nearly $1,000 CAD for a total of $8,000.
19
After I recovered from my wallet being drained, I wondered how will fans from lower income countries afford this?
20
Today, the cheapest seat available on the official platform across all 104 matches is around $200 ish.
21
The cheapest seat to a USA match is about $1,100.
22
The cheapest final ticket is $2,030, but let's compare that against the median income in Italy.
23
Oh, sorry, Italy didn't qualify.
24
What about France?
25
The median income before taxes is around $51,000 USD.
26
Not looking good.
27
What about the last competition champions, Argentina?
28
They're around $8,000.
29
Or perennial challenger? Brazil.
30
They're around $7,666.
31
We can go on and on and on.
32
But I think the point is pretty clear.
33
These tickets are out of reach for most fans around the world, but whatever.
34
Maybe you bite the bullet and buy a category one ticket.
35
Well, FIFA probably screwed you.
36
Remember those tickets I won through the random draw?
37
You see, they were category one, and I thought, wow, these seats are going to be insane.
38
But then I noticed something.
39
My brother also won seats basically beside me, and so did nearly everyone else I know who won.
40
We were all placed in these little corners of the stadium.
41
I'd normally be okay with this, but in this case, FIFA showed seating maps that made it look like regular fans could buy seats along the lower sidelines.
42
Instead, FIFA kept the vast majority of those seats aside for “On Location”, which sells expensive hospitality packages.
43
Think VIP tickets with food, lounge access, etc..
44
It's so bad, the California attorney General opened a consumer protection investigation in May.
45
But what is “On Location”?
46
On Location is a company owned by Endeavor, which is run by the real life Ari Emmanuel.
47
The guy fictionalized in Entourage.
48
It was originally launched by the NFL to sell packages to the Super Bowl, and now they hold the exclusive contract to sell hospitality for all 16 World Cup venues.
49
Listen to how crazy this is!
50
Their cheapest three match group stage bundle is $5,300 per person.
51
Their flagship eight match MetLife package, the one that includes the final, is $73,200 per person, and the craziest, a full private box at a venue series runs over $100,000.
52
Okay, maybe you don't care about the tickets.
53
Fine. What about everything else?
54
Hotels across North America have all increased significantly.
55
For example, in Vancouver, 350 days before, hotel rooms were $584, 164 days before the tournament, they increased to $775.
56
Then you need to consider what it cost to enter the U.S..
57
International fans from visa waiver countries pay $40 for an ESTA.
58
That's up from $21 in September 2025.
59
Under the One Big Beautiful Bill act.
60
Fans from countries that need a full B1 or B2 visa pay $435, which includes a new $250 visa integrity fee that did not exist before October 2025.
61
That is a lot of money.
62
We're not even mentioning that in cities like New York, S.F.
63
or Vancouver. You pay $8 just for a coffee.
64
This isn't Russia, where $2.50 gets you the deed to your cousin Igor's house.
65
Or airline prices which have gone through the roof in June and July, made even worse by the Iran and U.S. war.
66
You have to keep in mind, people didn't know they were coming to this World Cup until a few months ago.
67
FIFA's defense for all of this is summed up by two quotes from FIFA president Gianni Infantino.
68
So we have to apply market rates.
69
You cannot go to watch in the US a college game, not even speaking about a top professional game of a certain level for for less than $300.
70
And this is the World Cup.
71
Listen, you could convince me that the final might reach those prices in America, but group stage matches shouldn't be reaching prices similar to Yankees postseason games or SEC rivalry games, or even some Super Bowl games.
72
And many fan support associations have raised the exact same concerns.
73
Football Supporters Europe, the umbrella body that represents all national fan groups in Europe, launched a formal complaint with the European Commission against FIFA for abusing its dominant position and for exorbitant prices.
74
But this doesn't end just with fans.
75
FIFA also dominates the host nations, states and cities.
76
So let's say you're not flying to MetLife.
77
You're going to be watching from home like the rest of us.
78
Even that has gone complicated.
79
In India, you still don't have an official broadcaster, and China only closed a deal three weeks before kick off.
80
Travel during the tournament and your home subscription probably won't work where you land.
81
Sadly, our beautiful game has borders now.
82
The fix is a VPN, specifically Proton VPN.
83
You pick a server in a country that carries a match and you watch the match.
84
Simple. That's it.
85
And you want to know the reason I picked Proton over the other VPNs?
86
It's because they actually mean it, when it comes to privacy.
87
They're Swiss-based, foundation-led, open source and built on European privacy law, and their no logs policy is verified by most independent auditors.
88
Most VPN companies sell the data they promise to protect.
89
But Proton doesn't.
90
Link is in the description and gets you an exclusive discount.
91
Big thanks to Proton for sponsoring this one.
92
Now, back to FIFA, who is somehow making this whole thing worse.
93
If you've watched our channel before, you know that we like to call out bad deals and bad governance.
94
Making a deal with FIFA might be one of the worst deals a government can make.
95
There are three things to look at here.
96
One: The host responsibilities. Two: The host concessions.
97
And Three: the host revenues.
98
Let's begin with the responsibilities.
99
Each US host city is on the hook for 100 or 200 million in direct costs covering stadium retrofits, fan festivals, transportation, security, and more.
100
BC Place alone required $170 to 180 million in stadium retrofits, and another 24 million for a high end grass training facility for teams.
101
Additionally, if we look at Vancouver, the total cost of running the games is $578 million.
102
The federal government is providing $215 million, whereas the B.C.
103
government is providing $362 million.
104
If we do some simple math, that is $82 million of taxpayer money per game.
105
Now, this might sound bad, but there are far worse examples.
106
When Brazil hosted in 2014, they spent $270 million USD for 43,000 seat stadium deep in the Amazon.
107
I mean, look at this map.
108
The town of Manaus is only accessible by plane or boat.
109
Today, the stadium generally sits empty, at most seeing 1000 fans for the local team games.
110
A similar thing was seen for the 2010 South Africa World Cup.
111
This is where Cape Town Stadium was built for $600 million on prime waterfront real estate.
112
Again, it basically sits empty, but outside of stadiums and other responsibilities, FIFA also requires significant concessions.
113
The first one: taxes. Hosts must grant FIFA and its commercial partners broad tax exemptions.
114
No corporate tax.
115
No sales tax. No municipal tax, no nothing.
116
But one could argue these revenues would not have been there in the first place.
117
And so maybe the governments aren't losing anything.
118
But then there are the exclusionary clean zones.
119
This zone is typically a two kilometer radius around the stadiums and fan festivals, where FIFA basically blocks all promotions that they don't have their grubby little hands on.
120
Moreover, this zone is often closed, preventing people from driving or even going to work at all.
121
Or in my case, going to Costco.
122
Listen to this.
123
So my barber had to close his business on game days, and he's going to receive zero compensation from the government.
124
How is that fair?
125
Cities are also required to remove graffiti, any unwanted signs or unwanted people.
126
Local events aren't even allowed to run during the same time as FIFA, and the list goes on and on and on and on.
127
One of the most incredible concessions required is that cities must guarantee hotel rooms for FIFA staff, teams and tourists.
128
Now, neither FIFA nor cities can mandate hotels to reserve rooms.
129
But when the government comes knocking on your door, it's pretty hard to say no.
130
But these hotel rooms are not guaranteed, though.
131
In fact, FIFA was allowed to cancel their bookings as late as spring 2026, and FIFA did just this.
132
Now, not all cities were hit hard, but Vancouver saw nearly 80% of their blocked rooms released, or roughly 15,000 room nights.
133
It's so bad that hotel bookings are actually lower than last summer.
134
Which, may I remind you, was a regular summer.
135
But the argument that government officials will give is that this will bring incredible benefits to the city.
136
They project significant revenues.
137
But is that true?
138
Firstly, none of and we mean literally none of the revenue generated by FIFA from tickets, advertising, beverage sales, merchandise sales or anything else go to the host governments.
139
Not even for these hideous host city jerseys, which cost nearly $400.
140
Can we take a moment to appreciate just how much of a money grab this is?
141
I mean, look at these jerseys and even the marketing for them.
142
Do these people even know what soccer fans are like?
143
Okay, so if they don't make money from FIFA activities, how do they make money?
144
Let's use Canada as an example, because it's arguably the worst off and because the US fought for some tax revenues.
145
The government is projecting a $3.8 billion gross economic impact, whatever that means.
146
That's against $1 billion of estimated costs.
147
Not bad. Right? A $2.8 billion gain?
148
Maybe the $3.8 billion gets broken down into $2 billion of GDP, $1.3 billion in labor income and $700 million in government revenue, or $4 billion.
149
Wait a minute. The numbers don't add up.
150
GEP is the total value of all goods and services produced, including intermediate inputs. In regular human speech, it is double counting.
151
The better framework for this is to think about how much the government is spending, the GDP they spend may generate and the revenue the government is collecting.
152
Okay, so the government is spending $1 billion, give or take, to generate $2 billion of GDP.
153
That is a two times multiplier on money spent.
154
But that $2 billion of GDP is most likely overstated.
155
Let me give you an example.
156
If someone from Calgary was planning to vacation in Kelowna for the summer and spend $2,000, but they are now going to Vancouver to spend some of that $2,000.
157
How do you account for this?
158
Is that $0 of FIFA GDP or $2,000 of FIFA GDP?
159
The government would say $2,000, but we would say that is wrong.
160
Furthermore, so far, early data suggests that tourism in cities like Vancouver is actually down compared to last year.
161
But more alarming is that the government will only collect $700 million in taxes for this event, which is $300 million less than it spent.
162
Now, normally when a government makes an investment, they hope the investment will generate GDP and taxes for the long run.
163
For example, if a government spends $1 billion on an airport, that airport may generate $300 million in tax revenues each year.
164
But it will do that for decades, making the investment worth it.
165
In addition, it will generate GDP for decades.
166
The FIFA World Cup is a one time event.
167
It will never generate more money for anyone in Canada, the US or Mexico.
168
This is the maximum financial impact.
169
Let's summarize this deal.
170
The government spends hundreds of millions, if not billions, gives up dozens of concessions, earns zero direct revenue, all for the opportunity to lose money.
171
Honestly, the government might as well give every citizen a one time stimulus check. It would have been better for the economy.
172
As mentioned, I love soccer, or football.
173
It is the greatest sport on earth.
174
You can come from any part of the world, from any income, background and make it.
175
You can be a 5’7 kid with growth hormone deficiency and become the GOAT.
176
Sorry, Ronaldo fans.
177
That is why it's such a spectacle.
178
Because no matter where you are from the world, you know what football is.
179
And FIFA knows this.
180
They've turned a page in their history and become increasingly commercial.
181
Increasingly American. Charging hundreds and in some cases, thousands for tickets to games that price out soccer-loving families like the Rueda’s all over the world.
182
They grease the hands of politicians who agree to absurd policies that leave government coffers empty, but line the pockets of FIFA.
183
And in doing so, FIFA generates billions.
184
And at the end of the tournament, when the winner is lifting the trophy, we will all know who the real winner actually is.
185
Thank you for watching.
186
By the way, we're going to be doing a part two where we look at where FIFA spends its money and how that money gets siphoned for corruption.
187
So make sure you're subscribed for that. Bye.
Scarica l'app
Tutto ciò che serve per parlare fluentemente
Pronuncia con IAVoto per ogni frase
Pratica IPAPadroneggia ogni suono
VocabolarioCostruisci il tuo lessico
Gioco di vocabolarioImpara giocando
Stesso Canale
C11
How Erdogan Is Destroying Turkey’s Future
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B22
Why Plastic Surgery Is Destroying Korea
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B22
Why Living In Australia Is Impossible
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B22
Why the UK's Economy is Awful
IELTS PrepBusiness EnglishUniversity Students
FOR YOU
Video consigliato
B22
159 frasi
How FIFA corrupted the World Cup
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B23
179 frasi
How England’s football league is breaking the sport
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B21
76 frasi
How should the Socceroos line up against Paraguay? | FIFA World Cup 2026™
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B22
151 frasi
Could You Spend $1 Trillion?
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B25
127 frasi
Video
Business EnglishDaily ConversationHigh School Students
B25
96 frasi
Why FIFA Spends Millions On World Cup Grass
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B23
51 frasi
Great Moments in Unintended Consequences: Yosemite Permits, Italy Superbonus, Salary Caps (Vol. 22)
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B22
264 frasi
Stelling and McCoist REVEAL their World Cup PREDICTIONS from Winners and Stars to Biggest FLOPS!
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B21
459 frasi
David Beckham on pressure, competition, and redemption | ReThinking
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B24
125 frasi
Are soccer players the most fit athletes on the planet?
Business EnglishDaily ConversationHigh School Students
B23
72 frasi
I Hate the Argentine Football Team
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
Perché praticare il parlare con questo video?
Questo video offre un'opportunità unica per migliorare la propria pratica di conversazione in inglese, grazie alla narrazione coinvolgente che esplora temi attuali legati al calcio e agli affari di FIFA. La passione per il calcio, espressa dalla famiglia Rueda, è un perfetto esempio di come la cultura e lo sport possano stimolare conversazioni significative. Praticare con questo video non solo aiuta a migliorare il vocabolario specifico legato allo sport, ma anche a comprendere come discutere argomenti complessi e attuali in inglese. Utilizzando il metodo shadowspeaks, gli studenti possono esercitare la loro capacità di parlare in modo fluido e naturale, ripetendo frasi e strutture in contesti realistici.
Grammatica ed Espressioni nel Contesto
Nei passaggi del video, possiamo notare l'uso di alcune strutture grammaticali e espressioni chiave:
- Uso del passato prossimo: "La famiglia ha partecipato" mostra come raccontare eventi passati in modo efficace.
- Domande retoriche: "Come faranno i tifosi dei paesi a basso reddito a permettersi questo?" dimostra come sollevare questioni importanti possa stimolare la conversazione.
- Comparazioni: "Il biglietto più economico è di circa $2,030", che aiuta gli studenti a formulare e presentare comparazioni in inglese.
- Terminologia specifica: Termini come "settore VIP" e "pacchetti di ospitalità" sono utili per chi desidera parlare di eventi e situazioni nel contesto sportivo.
Praticare queste strutture attraverso shadowing site permette di acquisire fiducia e migliorare la pronuncia nei contesti appropriati.
Trappole Comuni nella Pronuncia
Ci sono alcune parole nel video che potrebbero rappresentare delle difficoltà per gli studenti:
- FIFA: La pronuncia corretta necessita di attenzione poiché è un acronimo.
- Hospitality: La 'h' iniziale è spesso omessa dai non madrelingua, ma è essenziale includerla per una pronuncia corretta.
- Competition: La ‘c’ e la ‘t’ possono essere confuse; è importante enfatizzare le consonanti per migliorare la chiarezza.
Imparare a pronunciare correttamente queste parole consente agli studenti di essere più fluidi nelle conversazioni e di migliorare la loro pronuncia inglese in modo generale. Utilizzando il metodo shadowspeak, gli studenti possono migliorare la loro capacità di parlare in situazioni quotidiane e specifiche con maggiore sicurezza.
La grammatica di questo video
Le strutture che chi parla usa di più, con le parole esatte del video:
| Struttura | Nel video |
|---|---|
| Forma passiva be + participio passato — conta ciò che accade, non chi lo fa | being drained · is run · was originally launched |
| Present perfect have/has + participio passato — un’azione passata che conta ancora adesso | have gone · have raised · has gone |
| Frasi relative who / which + frase — un’informazione in più su una persona o una cosa | Endeavor, which is · prices which have · event, which is |
Cos'è la tecnica dello Shadowing?
Shadowing è una tecnica di apprendimento delle lingue supportata da studi scientifici, originariamente sviluppata per la formazione dei traduttori professionisti e resa popolare dal poliglotta Dr. Alexander Arguelles. Il metodo è semplice ma potente: ascolti un audio in inglese di madrelingua e lo ripeti immediatamente ad alta voce — come un'ombra che segue il parlante con un ritardo di solo 1–2 secondi. A differenza dell'ascolto passivo o degli esercizi di grammatica, lo shadowing costringe il tuo cervello e i muscoli della bocca a elaborare e riprodurre simultaneamente i modelli di discorso reale. La ricerca dimostra che migliora significativamente la precisione della pronuncia, l'intonazione, il ritmo, il discorso connesso, la comprensione dell'ascolto e la fluidità del parlato — rendendolo uno dei metodi più efficaci per la preparazione alla prova di speaking dell'IELTS e per la comunicazione reale in inglese.