Pratica di Shadowing: What makes for a dream job? (part 1) @ Cambridge University - Impara a parlare inglese con i video

Scegli una modalità di pratica

Ogni modalità apre una sala di pratica a schermo intero.

200 frasi
Se le frasi sono troppo corte o troppo lunghe, clicca su Edit per modificarle.
1
What actually is a fulfilling career?
2
If you want a dream job that's really satisfying, what should you look for?
3
The normal approach to this is to ask you to think about what types of things
4
you found most fulfilling in the past and then help you try to figure out what jobs might involve those things.
5
A bit like this.
6
And I think it is useful to spend some time thinking about what really makes you happy, what your dream job might be,
7
but there's a limit to how far this self -reflection can go.
8
In the last few decades there's been a lot of research
9
that shows that we're bad at predicting how happy different activities will make us.
10
We're even bad at remembering how happy different experiences made us.
11
One well -established bias is that we mainly judge the pleasure of an experience by how pleasurable it was at the end.
12
Leading Dan Gilbert to remark, the fact that we often judge the pleasure and experience by its end can cause us to make some curious choices.
13
This research is summarised by Professor Dan Gilbert at Harvard in this excellent book,
14
Stumbling Upon Happiness, all about how we're bad at judging how happy different things will make us.
15
More to the point, I think we can do better in this workshop than just doing lots of self -reflection.
16
There's now been several decades of research into positive psychology, and the science of what causes well -being.
17
And what I'm going to do in this talk is just summarize the key findings of
18
that research and help you apply them to your own career.
19
Let's start with what not to look for.
20
We often imagine that a dream job is easy and well -paid.
21
For instance, the most popular career ranking in the US uses the following four criteria.
22
Tries to find jobs that are low in stress, not unpleasant in their working environment,
23
have a high salary and there's a high growth rate of positions.
24
Now, which career do you think came out on top based on those four factors?
25
Well, actually, the answer is an actuary.
26
That's someone who does statistical analysis for insurance companies.
27
Who here wants to be an actuary?
28
Okay, no one.
29
And that shows that these traits are just wrong.
30
I don't think you should be aiming for an especially high salary and rather than aiming for an easy job,
31
I think you should be aiming for a challenging job.
32
Okay, so why don't aim for money?
33
It's a consensus in social science that the more money you have, the harder it is for more money to make you happier.
34
The relationship is thought to look something like this.
35
As your income increases, the amount your happiness increases by goes down and down with each extra bit of income.
36
and this is now backed, this theoretical relationship is now backed by a lot of empirical studies.
37
For instance this huge global survey of life satisfaction.
38
Now on the side we have self -reported life satisfaction
39
which is basically asking people on a scale of one to ten how satisfied are you with your life
40
and then on the bottom we have household income.
41
You can see these nice clear straight lines.
42
These lines are straight rather than curved as the thing we just saw
43
because on the bottom we've now got a log scale.
44
Each increment is doubling rather than going up linearly.
45
What this basically shows is
46
that you have to double your income to just get an extra half point of happiness on a 1 to 10 scale.
47
That's a lot of income for a very small increase in happiness.
48
This becomes even more extreme if we look at some other outcomes besides life satisfaction.
49
Here's another big survey by two
50
Nobel Prize winning economists, Kahneman and Deaton.
51
Again we've got a log scale on the bottom, in the middle we have a ladder which is just life satisfaction again
52
and again that's showing roughly a straight line like we just saw.
53
But now we've got three other outcomes.
54
The top one is positive affect and for that it was basically people who did you feel happy yesterday?
55
If you said yes then you were counted as a one.
56
And then you can see on the left the fraction of people who answered yes.
57
So about 70 % of people said yes I felt happy yesterday.
58
Then you've got not blue which is you're asked were you unhappy yesterday and if you said no then you're counted here.
59
And then finally stress free were you not stressed yesterday?
60
What you can see is
61
that all three of these things almost completely go flat at around the $50 ,000 of annual income mark
62
and so what this is showing is that after $50 ,000 there was no relationship between how happy people felt,
63
how much sadness they felt and whether they were stressed or not.
64
And on the bottom this is actually household income and $50 ,000 of household income is actually just $25 ,000, about half of individual income.
65
The people in this audience are all in a group where on average
66
you're going to earn more like $70 ,000 per year over your career.
67
And so you're all in the region where there's just very little relationship between extra income and being happier.
68
You're all in the flat part of the curve.
69
And this just means that income won't be a big driver of how satisfied you are with your life.
70
Okay, the other thing that isn't fulfilling is a low stress job don't aim for an easy job, rather aim for a challenging job.
71
Many studies have now found that the people who work hard
72
and succeed and retire late and really conscientious end up happier and even living longer than those who drift around,
73
don't succeed and retire early.
74
This is despite the fact that the successful people actually work longer hours, get less sleep, have greater demands placed on them.
75
The picture of stress in modern psychology is not the simple all stress is bad, it's more something like this.
76
So on one side we have how many demands are placed on you
77
and then on the bottom we have how much power you have to cope with those demands and deal with them.
78
And you can see if you have few demands placed on you then it's more
79
that you're actually going to be bored or drifting.
80
Stress becomes bad when you have lots of demands but not much power to deal with it.
81
This is the kind of boss from hell scenario where you have lots of targets,
82
but you can't actually have freedom over figuring out what to do and taking action and succeeding on those.
83
The right place to be, the best place to be, is having lots of demands, but also having lots of power to deal with those.
84
And then that is a fulfilling challenge.
85
If we look at it a bit more broadly, I think the picture now is that stress, whether it's good or bad,
86
really depends on the context.
87
If you have lots of stress but you have freedom in how you deal with it,
88
you have power to get stuff done and you feel like your work is meaningful and you're socially supported, you have people helping you out,
89
then stress could be neutral or perhaps even good.
90
It encourages personal growth, it's a fulfilling challenge.
91
stress only becomes bad when it's in the context of not having any freedom, being isolated, feeling like your work is meaningless.
92
So looking at all this I think the message is much more
93
that you shouldn't seek out an easy job rather seek out these supportive conditions and then challenge yourself.
94
Okay so that's what not to look for, what actually matters, what should you be looking for in a fulfilling career. In the book
95
Flourish, one of the founders of positive psychology, Professor Martin Seligman summarises the key factors
96
that cause human well -being discovered in the last two decades of positive psychology research as the following five factors.
97
The first is positive emotion.
98
This is feeling happy, feeling cheerful, optimistic day to day.
99
The second is engagement.
100
This is work that you find really absorbing and it gives you sense of flow.
101
Then relationships is another crucial ingredient, supportive, good relationships.
102
Meaning is the fourth one, this is contributing to a purpose beyond just your own satisfaction.
103
And then there's accomplishments, which is being good at what you do.
104
There's an academic debate about whether these factors really constitute the fundamental elements of well -being or not,
105
but everyone agrees that they're at least important parts of it or they correlate with it.
106
Okay so what does this mean for choosing what work to do?
107
I'm going to apply these factors to job selection
108
and combine it with the literature specifically about job satisfaction to come up with a list of factors
109
that you can use to choose between careers.
110
So the first is engaging work.
111
This corresponds to engagement from Seligman's five factors.
112
Engaging work is the most well empirically supported predictor of job satisfaction that's been discovered so far.
113
It breaks down into these four criteria,
114
these four factors, each of which has been shown in large meta -analyses to correlate around 0 .4 with job satisfaction.
115
So autonomy is how much freedom you have over how the work is done, clear tasks is pretty self -explanatory,
116
feedback is how easy is it to know how well you're doing in the work,
117
and then variety is do you get to do lots of different types of things in the work.
118
If you want a picture of something super engaging, then think of a computer game.
119
These are designed to be optimally engaging.
120
You have control of what's going on, clear aims, you know how well you're doing, and a variety of tasks.
121
If you want to picture something unengaging, then think of this, office admin.
122
You've got little control over your hours, what the work processes are, you We have endless similar tasks, no clear effects on important outcomes.
123
So that's engaging work, the first factor.
124
But just engagingness isn't enough.
125
These jobs all have high engagingness, but aren't seen by the people pursuing them as meaningful.
126
And as we also saw, meaning was one of the other five factors.
127
It's really important for being fulfilled.
128
Which jobs are actually meaningful?
129
Well, I think the easiest route to a meaningful job is to do one that helps others.
130
If we compare these jobs, These are all things that the people doing them almost all find meaningful,
131
and they're also among the jobs that people find most satisfying.
132
So this leads to the second factor, do work that helps others.
133
And then there's also much other research that shows
134
that acts of altruism in your life are strongly related to a sense of happiness and fulfillment.
135
Here's just one example of many.
136
this really large survey across the world over 150 countries
137
they looked at the relationship between giving to charity in the last month
138
and subjective well -being
139
which is just how satisfied people said
140
they are with their lives on a scale of one to ten they found
141
that donating to charity had a similar relationship to subjective well -being as a doubling of household income
142
and this is just one result from a large literature on the benefits of altruism
143
which is not just confined to giving to charity.
144
It also applies to helping people you know, volunteering and just doing anything where you have a sense of purpose.
145
So the first two factors were engaging work and work that helps others.
146
Now we're going to fill in a couple of other factors a bit faster.
147
The third one is being good at your work.
148
That corresponds to achievement in Seligman's five factors.
149
Here it's particularly important to do something that you're good at that uses your unique strengths.
150
Fourth is having good relationships with your colleagues.
151
Social support is highly correlated to job satisfaction.
152
Then we have hygiene factors.
153
These are basically an absence of something that is making you actively unhappy, like having a really long commute,
154
excessively long hours, or pay that you think is unfair.
155
And then finally, fit with the rest of life.
156
Don't think that you have to get all of Seligman's five factors out of your work.
157
Another option is to seek a job that gives you enough time to get fulfilling relationships or achievements in your spare time.
158
One thing to note about this list is that none of it is particularly related to the subject matter of the work.
159
When we think of a fulfilling career, one common thought is to think in terms of finding the
160
career where you're most interested in the subject matter of the work.
161
So for instance, if you really love sports, then work on something involving sports and that's how to be fulfilled.
162
But there's not much support for this idea in these factors.
163
All these factors are much more about the circumstances of the work, not the subject matter.
164
If you work in sport but with people you hate, or doing something that you find meaningless, then you're going to end up unhappy.
165
Whereas if you have these six things, then you'll become interested, you'll become fulfilled by new areas.
166
So doing what you're interested in isn't as important as people most often think.
167
So if you want to be fulfilled in your work, how would I sum it up?
168
I'd sum it up as do what contributes.
169
Get good at something that helps others.
170
How does this work?
171
Well firstly I think
172
if you get good at your work then you're going to be able to take care of the other factors.
173
You're going to be able to make sure you're doing something engaging, you're going to be able to work with people you like,
174
you're going to be able to fit it with the rest of your life.
175
You can be really good at your work, get these other factors but nevertheless still find the work meaningless
176
and that's why you add in you also have to do something
177
that helps others and that's the way to also then be truly fulfilled.
178
Why else should you focus on doing what contributes?
179
Well another reason is that I think
180
if you focus on helping others you'll actually be more successful
181
and that's because people will want to help you back and they want to help you succeed because it's helping the world.
182
And there's now a great book that summarizes surprising amount of actual empirical evidence for this idea.
183
Give and take by Professor Adam Grant, which argues that people with a giving mindset often end up being more successful than average.
184
And also I think focusing on helping others is the morally right thing to do.
185
We're some of the most privileged people in the world.
186
Here's a graph of world income.
187
On the bottom you have the percentage of people at different income levels
188
and on the side you have how much income their earning.
189
As we just saw, you're all going to be earning around an average of $70 ,000
190
over your career per year and that means you're all right in the very peak of that distribution.
191
In fact, many of you will be way off this graph.
192
The rest of the world, by contrast, barely registers.
193
They're just far, far poorer than you will be.
194
This means you have an extraordinary opportunity to help people, and in my view, a duty to do so.
195
The idea that you should focus on helping others in order to be fulfilled is hardly a new idea.
196
Even the Buddha agrees with me.
197
It's a theme from many major spiritual and moral traditions.
198
If you want to be fulfilled in your career, do what contributes.
199
In the next talk, we'll cover how.
200
Thank you.

Scarica l'app

Tutto ciò che serve per parlare fluentemente

Pronuncia con IAVoto per ogni frase
Pratica IPAPadroneggia ogni suono
VocabolarioCostruisci il tuo lessico
Gioco di vocabolarioImpara giocando
FOR YOU

Video consigliato

Vocabolario e note di pronuncia per questa lezione

Questa lezione di conversazione si basa sul video “What makes for a dream job? (part 1) @ Cambridge University”. Le parole che ritornano più spesso: factor, income, career. Questo video contiene 200 frasi e 2680 parole da ripetere con lo shadowing. Il parlato dura 15:26. Chi parla ha un ritmo naturale di circa 174 parole al minuto, vicino a una conversazione quotidiana. Il 88% delle parole rientra nelle 3.000 più comuni dell’inglese, quindi il lessico è facile da seguire.

Vocaboli chiave di questo video

15 parole del video che vale la pena imparare, con pronuncia e significato:

ParolaPronunciaSignificato
fulfill verbo/fʊlˈfɪl/completare
distress sostantivo/dɪˈstɹɛs/angoscia, pena
satisfaction sostantivo/sætɪsˈfækʃən/soddisfazione
engage verbo/ɪnˈɡeɪd͡ʒ/attirare, convergere
happiness sostantivo/ˈhæpinɪs/felicità, gioia
meaningful aggettivo/ˈmiː.nɪŋ.fl̩/significativo, sensato
satisfy verbo/ˈsætɪsfaɪ/soddisfare, accontentare
household aggettivo/ˈhaʊshoʊld/domestico, casalinghi
contribute verbo/kənˈtɹɪb.jut/contribuire
psychology sostantivo/saɪˈkɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/psicologia
earn verbo/ɝn/guadagnare
charity sostantivo/ˈtʃæɹɪti/ente di beneficenza, organizzazione benefica
outcome sostantivo/ˈaʊtkʌm/risultato
unhappy aggettivo/ʌnˈhæpi/triste, rattristato
meaningless aggettivo/ˈmiː.nɪŋ.ləs/senza senso, privo di significato

I phrasal verb che sentirai

ParolaSignificato
end up verboandare a finire, finire
figure out verboscoprire, rendersi conto
come up with verboideare, escogitare
go up verbosalire

Frasi da ripetere

Frasi brevi e complete del video che puoi riutilizzare nella conversazione di tutti i giorni:

  • Let's start with what not to look for.
  • You're all in the flat part of the curve.
  • I'd sum it up as do what contributes.
  • Why else should you focus on doing what contributes?
  • They're just far, far poorer than you will be.

La grammatica di questo video

Le strutture che chi parla usa di più, con le parole esatte del video:

StrutturaNel video
Frasi condizionali if + frase, will/would + verbo — una condizione e il suo risultatoif you focus on helping others you'll actually
Forma passiva be + participio passato — conta ciò che accade, non chi lo fais summarised · is thought · is now backed
Frasi relative who / which + frase — un’informazione in più su una persona o una cosasomeone who does · ladder which is · people who did
Present perfect have/has + participio passato — un’azione passata che conta ancora adessothere's been · There's now been · have now found

Pronuncia a cui fare attenzione

Chi parla usa 52 contrazioni e forme ridotte, come you're, don't, we're. Pronunciale nella forma breve, così come le senti.

  • I suoni “th”: nevertheless /ˌnɛvɚðəˈlɛs/, theoretical /ˌθi.əˈɹɛt.ɪ.kəl/
  • I suoni “sh” e “zh”: satisfaction /sætɪsˈfækʃən/, reflection /ɹɪˈflɛkʃən/, contrast /kənˈt(ʃ)ɹæst/, crucial /ˈkɹuː.ʃəl/, emotion /ɪˈməʊ.ʃən/
  • Parole lunghe — attenzione all’accento: satisfaction /sætɪsˈfækʃən/, psychology /saɪˈkɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/, empirical /ɪmˈpɪɹɪkəl/, extraordinary /ɪksˈtɹɔːrdɪn(ə)ɹi/, fundamental /ˌfʌn.dəˈmɛn.təl/

I suoni difficili per chi parla italiano:

  • /h/ — va soffiata, non è muta: happiness /ˈhæpinɪs/, household /ˈhaʊshoʊld/, unhappy /ʌnˈhæpi/, whereas /(h)wɛɹˈæz/, hygiene /ˈhaɪˌd͡ʒiːn/
  • Consonante finale — senza aggiungere una vocale dopo: distress /dɪˈstɹɛs/, engage /ɪnˈɡeɪd͡ʒ/, happiness /ˈhæpinɪs/, household /ˈhaʊshoʊld/, contribute /kənˈtɹɪb.jut/
  • /æ/ — più aperta della “e”: satisfaction /sætɪsˈfækʃən/, happiness /ˈhæpinɪs/, satisfy /ˈsætɪsfaɪ/, charity /ˈtʃæɹɪti/, unhappy /ʌnˈhæpi/

Come esercitarsi con questo video

  1. Ascolta tutto il video una volta senza parlare e annota le parole che non conosci.
  2. Inizia a velocità 0,75×, fai shadowing frase per frase e torna alla velocità normale quando diventa facile.
  3. Registrati e confronta con l’originale, facendo attenzione a parole come fulfill, distress, satisfaction.

Cos'è la tecnica dello Shadowing?

Shadowing è una tecnica di apprendimento delle lingue supportata da studi scientifici, originariamente sviluppata per la formazione dei traduttori professionisti e resa popolare dal poliglotta Dr. Alexander Arguelles. Il metodo è semplice ma potente: ascolti un audio in inglese di madrelingua e lo ripeti immediatamente ad alta voce — come un'ombra che segue il parlante con un ritardo di solo 1–2 secondi. A differenza dell'ascolto passivo o degli esercizi di grammatica, lo shadowing costringe il tuo cervello e i muscoli della bocca a elaborare e riprodurre simultaneamente i modelli di discorso reale. La ricerca dimostra che migliora significativamente la precisione della pronuncia, l'intonazione, il ritmo, il discorso connesso, la comprensione dell'ascolto e la fluidità del parlato — rendendolo uno dei metodi più efficaci per la preparazione alla prova di speaking dell'IELTS e per la comunicazione reale in inglese.

Tecnica dello shadowing: leggi la guida completa passo dopo passo →