쉐도잉 연습: A Letter to Jordan Peterson: You Changed. - 영상으로 영어 말하기 배우기

연습 모드 선택

각 모드는 전체 화면 연습실로 열립니다.

108 문장

문장이 너무 짧거나 길면 Edit를 눌러 조정하세요.

One of the most difficult types is the intuitive inner world.

He has intuitions as to the subjective factor, namely the inner world, very difficult to understand.

Because what he sees are most uncommon things.

He doesn't like to talk of them, if he's not a fool.

Nietzsche once wrote, quote,

Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster himself, end quote.

Dear Dr. Peterson, I hope this public letter reaches you at least in some capacity.

Though I only speak for myself, I hope to also give voice to the people who found you in your old days on YouTube.

For context, and to offer some credibility, I have watched all through your 2014,

15, and 16 personality lecture series in your Toronto University days.

In fact, those lectures inspired me to study psychology, and I am now starting my master's degree.

I also finished your Maps of Meaning lecture series and read the book as well.

I also read both the 12

Rules for Life books and engaged in many hours of your content via podcasts or clips on YouTube.

I am declaring all of this not to flatter you,

but to show my genuine interest in your work and to support my ability to discuss your current public image.

I feel a jarring difference in your communication if I jump from your old lectures to your recent public appearances.

Now, who in the world is that?

That's Carl Jung.

My goddamn government came out the other day, those bloody liberals.

You come across as angrier and more frustrated.

I understand that you're entrenched in a culture war

and publicity has visibly taken its toll on you and brought you a lot of shit, which at times you sound resentful about,

although you've warned others against this emotion.

How much do you know about me?

I didn't lie to save my career.

I didn't lie to save my clinical practice.

Of course, naturally, I personally don't have any idea about your life or your experience,

or the amount of criticism levied your way through all this time.

However, if the other side side, wants to portray you as an old,

angry, bitter, resentful, right -wing ideologue, then you're playing right into their hand.

If we rewind the clock, what made you famous in the first place was your calmness

and sober composure when facing the likes of Kathy Newman or Helen Lewis.

However, it is the only thing that you get paid for under capitalism.

Ha!

Gotcha!

In essence, your best qualities shined forth.

Strong verbal ability, patience, balance, and reasonableness.

Your other appearances reflected your best trait as professor.

Synthesizing, distilling, connecting highly abstract and difficult ideas and explaining them in approachable ways that highlight their meaning and importance.

That's a good example of how our fundamental assumptions can be challenged at any moment

and how a fact can turn from a fact into a clear fallacy.

Basically, you made philosophy and psychology accessible and practical to people who otherwise would not have any contact with it.

I think your career is built on this foundation, which is why critics relentlessly and constantly attack this point,

especially so -called intellectuals.

Now, however, much of that clarity seems lost in translation.

Your critics often don't understand you, and even for your longtime followers, it is getting harder to understand what you're getting at.

When I watch this clip,

for example, I do get your meaning,

but only because I engaged with your lectures.

For anyone else, this is likely incomprehensible, perhaps scattered or even alienating.

And your frustration in that clip might indicate that you feel this way as well.

Look, you warned against resentment and ideology,

saying that a clear sign of it is knowing beforehand what a person will say in any given conversation.

And this is why I consider it a manifestation of ideological possession.

It's predictable.

Yet, how many answers of yours nowadays start with psychopaths and narcissists or the radical left?

That repetition can sound ideological in itself.

It also seems you have a harder time listening and empathizing with people now.

Which is making you feel social pain.

Right.

You don't feel that if you have psychopathic tendencies.

Yes, and then, well, and if that pain doesn't make itself, like, I think that...

You often seem less interested in the other person's point of view.

You come off as more combative, perhaps rushing to get your message across, under pressure and stress, as if under siege.

Which, to be fair, perhaps you are, but it is still working against you.

I already mentioned the other side, but what side is it, truly?

Is the solution really to draw lines in the sand and embrace polarization and add to it?

I hope that people like you would rather be bridges, would be brave yet humble voices of calm and wisdom,

arguing and verbalizing their points amidst all of this chaos.

No one?

One?

Just three people?

Okay, well, that's probably not good.

However, with your recent dive into politics and business, you increasingly seem like a persona, like a branded figure rather than a person.

I remember your decision against studying politics in your youth, and perhaps that was not without reason.

You warned against alarmists, yet I regularly encounter clips of you warning about the doom of Western civilization.

Like, I think the gatekeepers have abandoned the gates, like terrorist radicals take over the universe.

The universities, I think, are beyond salvaging.

What happened to your good nature?

Certainly risk offending me and that's fine.

I think more power to you as far as I'm concerned.

You fought against triggered people with a smile but that smile is vanishing now.

I quoted Nietzsche at the start of the letter not without reason for I know you know this quote too.

In essence I think that quote encapsulates perfectly the arc of your public journey.

Look whatever you have to say which I know at bottom is well -meaning and good is simply not getting across.

And it saddens me because we need voices to talk about symbolism, faith, and meaning.

Perhaps it is not always just onwards and upwards.

Perhaps there is also something to be said about the element of the garden, which must be maintained with patience, humility, and love.

To be fair, it's hard to estimate how much reels, shorts, and clips, and the algorithms behind them distort anyone's image,

not just yours, and is adding to this situation.

But that is a topic for another day.

To close, I will add my favorite clip of yours, which I think encapsulates you well as a person as seen by your followers.

As for myself, I hope you find ways to reconnect with your roots, with your best traits, and to bring people together and not apart.

Young people need role models and not moral lecturers wagging their finger at them, and I know you know this.

I hope this letter did not miss the target.

Sincerely yours, Augustus.

We better stop before that girl comes in.

It was very nice having you all in the class and I appreciated the warm welcome I got,

100

especially in January, because it was a rough time in January

101

and so I'm glad this all worked out so well and it was a pleasure teaching you.

102

So good luck to you all.

103

I mean it.

104

Be what you can be god you let the world dissolve around

105

you otherwise that's not a good thing you've got something

106

that everyone needs man including yourself it's like let it out that's where everything you want is

107

and it's this it's the case for every single one of you

108

so you know hoist up your goddamn privilege and go out there and do something in the world see ya

앱 다운로드

유창하게 말하는 데 필요한 모든 것

AI 발음 평가문장마다 점수 확인

IPA 발음 연습모든 소리 마스터

단어 학습나만의 단어장 만들기

단어 게임놀면서 외우기

QR 스캔

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

같은 채널

Why Pornography Is Basically Modern Mythology

University StudentsWorking Adults

FOR YOU

이 레슨의 어휘와 말하기 포인트

이 말하기 레슨은 영상 “A Letter to Jordan Peterson: You Changed”을(를) 바탕으로 합니다. 가장 자주 반복되는 단어는 다음과 같습니다: lecture, clip, meaning, perhaps, seem. 이 영상에는 섀도잉할 문장 16개와 단어 888개가 있습니다. 말하는 구간의 길이는 7:46입니다. 화자는 분당 약 114단어의 일정한 속도로 말해서 섀도잉하기에 편한 속도입니다. 영어에서 가장 많이 쓰이는 3,000단어에 속하는 단어가 78%뿐이라 어휘가 어려운 편입니다. 전체 16문장 중 4문장이 질문이어서 의문문 억양과 짧은 대답을 연습하기에 좋습니다.

이 영상의 핵심 어휘

영상에 나오는 익혀 둘 만한 단어 15개를 발음, 뜻과 함께 정리했습니다.

단어	발음	뜻
lecture 명사	/ˈlɛk.t͡ʃə/	강의
warn 동사	/woɹn/	경고하다
psychology 명사	/saɪˈkɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/	심리학
patience 명사	/ˈpeɪ̯.ʃəns/	참을성, 인내
nowadays 부사	/ˈnaʊ.ə.deɪz/	요즘
trait 명사	/tɹeɪt/	특징
resentment 명사	/ɹɪˈzɛnt.mənt/	원망
topic 명사	/ˈtɑpɪk/	화제, 주제
finger 명사	/ˈfɪŋɡɚ/	손가락
practical 형용사	/ˈpɹæk.tɪ.kəl/	실질적인
argue 동사	/ˈɑɹ.ɡju/	논하다, 의논하다
element 명사	/ˈɛləmənt/	요소
sand 명사	/sænd/	모래
reflect 동사	/ɹɪˈflɛkt/	반사(反射)하다
translation 명사	/tɹænzˈleɪʃən/	번역, 옮김

이 영상의 문법

화자가 가장 많이 쓰는 문형을 영상 속 실제 표현과 함께 정리했습니다.

문형	영상 속 표현
현재완료 have/has + 과거분사 — 과거의 일이 지금도 관련이 있을 때	have watched · has visibly taken · you've warned
수동태 be + 과거분사 — 누가 하는지보다 무슨 일이 일어나는지에 초점	can be challenged · is built · be said
관계절 who / which + 절 — 사람이나 사물에 대한 추가 정보	people who found · people who otherwise · foundation, which is

주의할 발음

“th” 소리: algorithm /ˈælɡəɹɪðm̩/, empathize /ˈɛmpəˌθaɪz/, psychopath /ˈsaɪkəʊpæθ/, synthesize /ˈsɪnθəsaɪz/
“sh”와 “zh” 소리: patience /ˈpeɪ̯.ʃəns/, rush /ɹʌʃ/, translation /tɹænzˈleɪʃən/, shine /ʃaɪn/, civilization /ˌsɪv.ɪ.laɪˈzeɪ.ʃən/
긴 단어 — 강세 위치에 주의: psychology /saɪˈkɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/, intellectual /ˌɪntəˈlɛkt͡ʃʊəl/, accessible /əkˈsɛs.ɪ.bəl/, ideology /aɪ.diˈɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/, civilization /ˌsɪv.ɪ.laɪˈzeɪ.ʃən/

한국어 화자가 어려워하는 소리:

/f/ — ㅍ(/p/)으로 바꾸지 말고 윗니를 아랫입술에 대기: finger /ˈfɪŋɡɚ/, reflect /ɹɪˈflɛkt/, frustration /fɹʌsˈtɹeɪ.ʃən/, follower /ˈfɒləʊə(ɹ)/, frustrate /ˈfɹʌsˌtɹeɪt/
/v/ — ㅂ(/b/)과 구별하기: whoever /huˈɛvɚ/, brave /bɹeɪv/, dive /daɪv/, civilization /ˌsɪv.ɪ.laɪˈzeɪ.ʃən/, verbal /ˈvɜː.bəl/
/z/ — ㅈ이 아니라 성대를 울리는 /s/: nowadays /ˈnaʊ.ə.deɪz/, resentment /ɹɪˈzɛnt.mənt/, translation /tɹænzˈleɪʃən/, wisdom /ˈwɪzdəm/, civilization /ˌsɪv.ɪ.laɪˈzeɪ.ʃən/

이 영상으로 연습하는 방법

먼저 말하지 않고 영상을 끝까지 듣고 모르는 단어를 적어 둡니다.
보통 속도로 한 문장씩 섀도잉하고, 화자의 리듬과 맞을 때까지 반복합니다.
자신의 목소리를 녹음해 원본과 비교하고, lecture, warn, psychology 같은 단어에 특히 주의합니다.

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법

쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.

섀도잉 방법: 단계별 전체 가이드 읽기 →

쉐도잉 연습: A Letter to Jordan Peterson: You Changed. - 영상으로 영어 말하기 배우기

연습 모드 선택

앱 다운로드

같은 채널

Why Pornography Is Basically Modern Mythology

추천 영상

How to Be a Good Listener (and Why Bother) - Prof. Jordan Peterson

Master your anxiety. Unleash your genius | Jesse Eisenberg for Big Think+

When Fear Chases You… Chase It Back | Jordan Peterson

Why You Need to Read Dostoyevsky - Prof. Jordan Peterson

Heidegger’s Forgotten Lectures to Psychiatrists

Stuart & Cliffe Knechtle | Do Agnostics Just Want To Have Control? | Give Me an Answer

The Scariest IQ Statistics | Jordan Peterson

Psychology of EGO: Why We Get Offended So Easily?

Choose Your Circle Wisely: Jordan Peterson on Cutting Out Toxicity

How to Regulate Emotions with High Neuroticism/Low Agreeableness | Jordan B Peterson

Why Education Is Important - Jordan Peterson

Bestselling Author Adam Grant on Why We're More Disconnected Than Ever