쉐도잉 연습: Essential English Grammar: WILL or WOULD? - YouTube로 영어 말하기 배우기

Hi, everybody.

⏸ 일시 정지

재생 속도:

163 문장

문장이 너무 짧거나 길면 Edit를 눌러 조정하세요.

Hi, everybody.

Welcome to www.engvid.com.

I'm Adam. In today's video, we're going to look at a little bit of grammar, and more specifically, we're going to look at the two verbs "will" and "would".

And the reason I'm focusing only on these two verbs is because people often mix up when to use one or the other.

So, it's very important that you understand the function, the functions of each word, and see how they're used in actual sentences to understand why you choose one and not the other.

Okay? So, let's look at, first of all, the actual functions of these words.

And keep in mind that in some cases, "would" is actually the past tense of "will", but I'll get into that in a moment.

So, first of all, when we use "will", we're talking about the future, always, and we're looking at something that's either a fact, although technically you can't say anything about the future as fact because we don't know.

So, more...

The better way to think of it is it's a real possibility, right?

Facts, until they actually happen, you don't know.

So, a real possibility.

"Would", on the other hand, is we use to...

When we talk about an unreal past, so something in the past that could have been different, but wasn't.

And you'll...

When I give you the example sentence, you'll understand what I mean.

But it's not real, that's the key, and it's in the past, not the future.

So, that's very important to remember.

Mostly, the most common use of "would" is to talk about something that is hypothetical.

Hypothetical basically means it's not real, it's imaginary.

You're talking about, basically, if a situation could happen, right?

You're talking about... that's the key word there, "if", "maybe".

Probably not, but maybe, right?

And again, when we see examples, you'll understand.

And we also use it to report speech, so we call this indirect reported speech.

I am saying what somebody else said.

So, I'm... Somebody said something to me, I'm telling you what that person said.

So, that's indirect reported speech.

And in this case, "would" acts as the past tense of "will", and we're going to see examples of that as well.

So, let's start with a couple of sentences, here.

He will make new friend...

He will make many new friends at school.

So, my wife and I are talking, we're worried about our son.

Our son is going to university in a different city, and my wife is worried that he'll be very lonely.

And I say, "Don't worry.

He will make many new friends at school." Now, is that a fact?

No, because I don't know.

Maybe he won't make many new friends at school.

Maybe everybody will hate him.

It's unlikely, but it's definitely a real possibility.

Based on his character, based on his history, most likely this is what will happen, so future real.

He would make new friends at school.

Now, there's two ways I need to complete this sentence.

He would make new friends at school is not a complete sentence because of this word "would".

As soon as you see this word, you know that something is not true, is not real.

So, "He would make new friends" means now no new friends.

So, whenever you see a sentence that uses "would" as the helping verb to the main verb, right away you understand that now whatever follows is actually not true, is not the case.

Okay? He would make new friends if he went out more.

So, right now he just sits in his room, he goes to class and then goes and sits in his dorm room all day and doesn't come out.

So, obviously he's not making new friends.

So, if he went out, and I'm using an unreal conditional here, "if" plus simple past verb.

If he went out, he would make new friends.

Or, he would make new friends at school, comma, but he doesn't go out much.

Here, I'm using the "but" to show a contrast, and I'm using the present verb to show you what the actual situation is now.

Now, technically I can go straight from school to "but", but even if I do this, this is where it gets a little confusing.

This is understood, I just don't need to say it.

So, bear with me.

I'm going to give you the whole full sentence.

He would make many new friends at school if he went out more, but he doesn't go out much, so he doesn't make new friends.

That's the full thing.

I don't want to say all that.

That's a lot of words that don't all need to be expressed.

I can just take this out completely, and just go to this conclusion, right?

"But he doesn't go out much." So, now, not making friends, why?

He doesn't go out.

But the key here is I'm talking about unreal situation, hypothetical situation, now.

Okay. We're going to look at some other examples to understand the other functions.

Okay, so now I have a few more examples for you.

They're not in any particular order, but I'll explain each one as we go.

So, now we're going to look at reported speech.

There are two types.

There's direct, and then there's indirect.

Direct reported speech will be inside quotation marks.

They could be happy, too, if you want them to be, but anyway.

Quotation marks means this is exactly the words that the person used when he spoke to me.

And now I'm telling it to somebody else, right?

I'm reporting to a third person.

So, if I'm using a direct with the quote, I don't change anything.

I take exactly the words that were given to me.

Now, in writing, you will notice there's a comma, quotation mark, everything, period, quotation mark.

Then there is indirect reported speech.

So, this person said the words to me, and I'm more or less paraphrasing to the next person.

So, I would say, "He said he would call." Now, that, because technically this is a noun clause, but most people just drop that.

You don't need it.

That's why I put it in bracket.

You can put it, you can take it out, both okay.

"He said he would call." Now, a general rule or the rule of indirect reported speech is that the verb goes one tense back.

So, "will", the only back you can go with "will" is "would".

This is the past tense of "would", and that's why I'm using that in the indirect reported speech.

Okay. So, here he's talking about the future, here he's still talking about the future, but I'm reporting it as the past, because he said it to me in the past, "said".

Okay. So, that's reported.

Next. And here we're going to get a little bit tricky, so just prepare yourselves for it.

I'm going to start with one sentence, and I'm going to finish it three different ways.

Three different ways.

"In order to get a promotion, she would need to make more sales." "In order to get a promotion, she will need to make more sales." Or "In order to get a promotion, she would have needed to make more sales." All three sentences are correct.

The meaning's slightly different, so let's start.

"In order to get a promotion at work", she wants to get a higher position, "she would need to make more sales." Now, we understand that "would" is a hypothetical, it's not real, meaning that she probably won't, will not make more sales.

Maybe there's not enough time, maybe she doesn't have enough clients, maybe she's just not very good at sales, so it's very unlikely that she will.

So, for this situation to be true, this situation would be... need to be true, but it's not, and I'm using "would".

100

On the other hand, if I say "She will need to make more sales", means she has another six months, if she works really hard, she can get these sales and she can get her promotion.

101

So, this is a real possibility.

102

Unreal possibility, she has no chance.

103

Real possibility, she has a very good chance of doing it.

104

And again, both are correct, but you have to pay attention to what the actual...

105

When somebody says this, what are they meaning?

106

Here, I know she's not getting the promotion.

107

Here, I think she can get the promotion.

108

Then, in order to get a promotion, she would have needed to make more sales.

109

This is the past, but you cannot change the past.

110

So, in order to get a promotion...

111

So, right this week, the boss is deciding who is getting promotions.

112

It's too late for her to get more sales.

113

The sales needed to be in the past.

114

It didn't happen.

115

She would have needed to, but she didn't.

116

That's understood.

117

"But she didn't", "would have", they go together.

118

In the past, you can't change it, it's not real, she's not getting the promotion.

119

So, no promotion, yes promotion, no promotion.

120

If you understand the way things are structured, right?

121

And this is what you have to pay close attention to, especially in spoken English.

122

In spoken English, the word "would" or "will", they go by very fast, so you need to pick it up.

123

A native speaker, for example, if somebody says to me, "Well, she would have needed to do that", she would have needed.

124

But I can pick up the "would have" and understand that she didn't.

125

A non-native speaker might not pick that word up and not understand the full context of the sentence.

126

So, you have to pay very close attention to that.

127

Okay? So, that's another use of "will" in "would".

128

We're going to go to the last sample.

129

Now, this is going to be a little bit more confusing because this is introducing a whole other grammatical tense.

130

"She will have met her goals by then", "She would have met her goals if she had tried harder".

131

So, let's start with the "would".

132

"She would have met her goals", this is the same as this one.

133

We're talking about an unreal past.

134

In the past, this was possible, but now the past is gone, it didn't happen, it's not possible anymore.

135

Can't change the past.

136

And here, it's easier to understand because of the "if".

137

If she had tried, with a past perfect.

138

So, she... If she did it, if she had tried harder, she would have met her goals.

139

She didn't try hard enough, she didn't meet her goal.

140

Fact. Here, "will have met", this is a future perfect.

141

Future perfect means that then, whatever that future time is, means her goals will be met.

142

But again, future perfect, I'm not going to really get into now, that's a whole other video by itself.

143

But just so you can compare, "will have", "would have", both of them can be used with a perfect.

144

The meanings are very, very different.

145

Future real, past unreal, and it's very important that you learn to pay attention to "will" and "would", because A, they're spoken very quickly, and B, they sound not that far from each other, because "would", "would".

146

In writing, obviously, much easier, you'll see it.

147

But in writing, you have to be careful to use the correct version.

148

And for example, let's say we're talking about IELTS or TOEFL essays, very, very often I see people using "would" when they should be using "will".

149

Not so much the other way around.

150

And I think the reason is people think that "would" is a more formal verb.

151

It's not. "Will" has a function, "would" has a function, use them correctly.

152

There's no such thing as formal or informal verbs in terms of usage.

153

Formal and informal vocabulary does not formal or informal grammar, so be careful about that in your writing.

154

And I hope...

155

That's it. I hope that all made sense to you.

156

Of course, you may have to watch the video again to get all the little details, but if you have any questions, go to www.engvid.com and ask me in the comments section.

157

I'll be happy to help you out some more there.

158

There's also a quiz at www.engvid.com.

159

Take the quiz, make sure you can understand all the different subtleties, all the slight differences between the two uses, and test yourself and take the quiz, and hopefully get a 10 out of 10.

160

Okay? If you like the video, please give me a like.

161

Don't forget to subscribe to my channel and ring that little bell up top there so you get notifications of new videos, and come back for more grammar, vocab, and other interesting English things.

162

See you again soon.

163

Bye-bye.

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법

쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.

☕ 커피 한 잔 사주기

ShadowingEnglish는 여러분의 지원 덕분에 100% 무료로 운영됩니다. 서버 및 AI 유지 비용이 많이 듭니다. 여러분의 커피 한 잔이 큰 힘이 됩니다! ��

PayPal로 기부하기

ShadowingEnglish.com – 영어 쉐도잉 연습

쉐도잉(Shadowing)으로 원어민처럼 영어를 말하세요. YouTube 영상을 한 문장씩 듣고 따라 말하며, 진짜 발음과 유창성을 키우세요. IELTS 학습자들이 선택한 방법.

쉐도잉 연습: Essential English Grammar: WILL or WOULD? - YouTube로 영어 말하기 배우기

이 비디오로 말하기 연습을 해야 하는 이유는?

문맥 속의 문법과 표현

일반적인 발음 트랩

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법

쉐도잉 연습: Essential English Grammar: WILL or WOULD? - YouTube로 영어 말하기 배우기

앱 다운로드

이 비디오로 말하기 연습을 해야 하는 이유는?

문맥 속의 문법과 표현

일반적인 발음 트랩

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법