쉐도잉 연습: p1 debate - 영상으로 영어 말하기 배우기
레슨 만드는 중...
1
Today's motion is Richard.
2
Today's motion, be resolved that leaders should be selected from the margins.
3
The juniors debated this yesterday.
4
Let's see how the seniors do.
5
Scholars on stage, you have 15 minutes to prepare.
6
That leaders should be selected from the margins.
7
Honorable Adjudicators, my supportive team, respectable opponents, I, Mark Kuo, of the International Bilingual School at Shinsu Science Park,
8
Taiwan, am the first speaker and will introduce my team's stance before passing the floor to my second and third speakers,
9
Robbie and Tara, who will further our arguments before our last speaker,
10
Ron, sweeps the opposing stance off its feet and closes our claim that leaders should be selected from the margins.
11
First, we would like to define the terms and present a slight rebuttal.
12
We believe that margins refers not just to the periphery,
13
but to the marginalized, which the prestigious Merriam-Webster defines as to relegate to an unimportant
14
or powerless position within a society or group.
15
Notice how there is no mention of a majority or a minority population.
16
Next, the definition of selected from Merriam-Webster as well means chosen from a number or group by fitness or preference.
17
We, the affirmative team, will not take the stance that leaders from the margins should be chosen by a twisted process process.
18
We believe that those under margins shall be selected by the natural process of democracy and will be selected in the future.
19
Furtherly, we'd like to dispute the idea that those already in power shall stay in power.
20
There is a basis for this on precedent, on supposed education, yet there are also cases of corruption.
21
But we, the affirmative, talk no further.
22
We the affirmative will not take such a negative outlook that those on the margins shall stay on the margins.
23
We believe and we will show why they will eventually become the leaders of tomorrow.
24
With the definition in mind, our contingents are, one, that the margins are also the majority.
25
Two, that those on the margins shall solve the problems of those on the margins much more easily, making this place a better world.
26
And three, that those on the margins are more relatable.
27
Now to move on to my first point,
28
I'll be talking about the poor, race, and on women.
29
First off, imagine working a blue-collar job while a businessman sitting in an office,
30
standing on a high golden chair, rules the world.
31
That is not a world that we can relate to.
32
That is not a world that the majority of people can relate to.
33
In a population of a village of 100, six people will own over 50% of the wealth.
34
The rest, the other 94 people, they will be left to scramble for the rest.
35
Those people are powerless on a monetary basis.
36
Those people are on the margins.
37
If we are to select a person from the poor, if we are to select a person from the fourth estate, if we are to select a person from the middle class,
38
they will surely be able to rule the world better
39
because they know the majority of the people and they'll be selected by the majority of people.
40
Now, the majority of people in this room are also a person of color.
41
The majority of the people around the world are people of color.
42
In South Africa, having a majority of people of color did not stop them from having segregation.
43
It did not stop them from suffering until one man, one very specific man, Mandela,
44
a black man, decided that it was time to change Changed his nation, and he did.
45
He suffered in jail.
46
He was an inspiration to all those incarcerated for fighting marginalization, and that went to jail for it.
47
By another example, Gandhi.
48
Gandhi rejected the British minority, even though the British minority were in rule.
49
He went on a hunger strike in order to save the majority of people, the people of his race.
50
You guys couldn't even stand a couple delays for lunch.
51
Keep that in mind.
52
Now, 51% of the people in this world are also of a marginalized group.
53
I would like the audience to think of what that group is.
54
You have that answer right.
55
That group are women.
56
The speaker is a hypocrite for being on the stage talking about women's issues.
57
We, the affirmative, are hypocrites
58
to believe that the majority ought to speak even though our stage is filled with a male dominant speaking group.
59
We believe that women ought to have the right to speak
60
because they are the majority and in a democracy which has proven to be the majority ruling system of this world, majorities take the rule.
61
Keep that in mind and we shall change the world on that basis.
62
As first speaker, I've thus given you the big innings of our contentions and organize the team structure.
63
I will allow our other three speakers to provide further evidence to the debate.
64
And I will close by saying this.
65
We are not just talking of a world on the margins.
66
We're talking about a world comprised of the margins.
67
God gave us two ears and one mouth.
68
Which one do you think he values more?
69
I think it's time to use our ears to listen to those on the margins.
70
Thank you.
71
Thank you, affirmative team.
72
Negative team, you have one minute to prepare.
73
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
74
I am the first speaker from the negative side, and my team and I are here to argue that leaders should not be selected from the margins.
75
I know that you have been empowered by the speech previously said by the affirmative team, but do not be swayed.
76
My team and I are here to argue that leaders should not be chosen just because you feel bad for them, just because they have been oppressed for so many years,
77
that does not quantify as a category for them to be chosen.
78
We argue that leaders should be chosen for their effectiveness.
79
Effective leadership should be above diversity.
80
First, we argue that the resources of a leader is important.
81
More privileged people have more resources to help those who are in the margins.
82
Unfortunately, this is true.
83
Those who are marginalized have less opportunities to gain the education that is needed
84
or the money that is needed to properly help those who are on the margins.
85
Next is that we need a leader who has experience.
86
Unfortunately, once again, those who are on the margins are underrepresented.
87
They have been excluded from several different things,
88
and they do not have the experience as of now that can be used to lead a nation.
89
And next, we argue that we should base our rulers on merit, not on social status.
90
Just because someone has been marginalized for so long,
91
that does not give them a free pass to suddenly have marginalized points to gain the upper hand.
92
Just because we are now starting to have diversity, does not automatically mean that those who are marginalized have an upper hand on the position of power.
93
Positions of power should be chosen because they have the resources and the responsibility and the skills to lead a nation,
94
not because of their social status.
95
Next, we argue about the reverse narrative.
96
One of our team members have stated that in Vietnam, a marginalized communist community enacted a purge on the rich,
97
Even though those who are on the rich did not have any negative provocations towards those who were marginalized.
98
Unfortunately, this is how the whole term reverse racism was invented.
99
Because marginalized people have been marginalized for so long,
100
of course there is going to be some sort of bitter seed at the bottom of their stomachs.
101
And we argue that by choosing positions of power just because of this reason that they are marginalized,
102
this will turn into an act of revenge.
103
Next, by choosing only leaders based solely on the fact
104
that they are marginalized might make it harder for the society to succeed.
105
Because of course, since they are marginalized,
106
they will have a bias towards those in their marginalized community meaning that they will be only seeing from one perspective.
107
And once again, we state that leaders and positions of power should be chosen not because of their social status,
108
but because they have the skill set to lead a country.
109
Yeah.
110
Our final stance on this is that we should let privileged people help the marginalized to be equal first.
111
Then we can choose our leaders on equal footing.
112
Thank you.
113
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, honorable judges, esteemed colleagues, and worthy opponents.
114
My name is Robby and I'm the second speaker for the affirmative side for the notion
115
that leaders should be chosen from the marginalized.
116
Now, I would first like to start off my speech by rebutting a few points made by the opposition.
117
Now, first, the opposition has said that we shouldn't choose them just because we feel bad for them.
118
Have we ever felt bad for the people that we have chosen into power?
119
No. When has our first speaker ever said that?
120
Never.
121
Never once has he ever stated that.
122
So why make that assumption, first of all?
123
Secondly, it says that they're chosen for their effectiveness.
124
Are the presidents that we've chosen or the leaders
125
that we've chosen in our society not effective even if they are from the marginalized?
126
Think about Obama.
127
Was he effective?
128
Of course he was effective.
129
I thought about Martin Luther King.
130
Yes, Gandhi.
131
All of these people that were marginalized coming out here to stand up for their communities, for their people.
132
They have been effective.
133
And now I'll move on to my first point.
134
Now, I would like to say that the marginalized understand the pains
135
and suffering and the struggles of the people that they are with.
136
Now, firstly, I would like to give an example.
137
We all know Barack Obama.
138
Elected in 2008, he first started by, he did many great deeds.
139
Firstly, he ended the war in Iraq.
140
Secondly, he supported the LGBTQ marriage.
141
And thirdly, he was able to start the important added public health care for people
142
that do not have the money to get important health care or basic human needs.
143
And secondly, I would like to start off with Martin Luther King.
144
We all know him for his great deeds as an advocate for human rights.
145
As well, some of his great achievements have been the Great March on Washington,
146
where over 200,000 people showed up to fight for the civil rights and economic equality for black people.
147
And finally, he was able to legislate and fought for Rosa Parks,
148
who was arrested due to sitting at the front of a bus. And so he fought.
149
And soon the Supreme Court ruled that segregation on buzz was unconstitutional.
150
And so, Honorable Judge, I would like to say that for the opposition to win, they must give solid evidence and prove that the decision
151
and benefits of choosing leaders that are not from the marginalized outweigh the benefits of choosing leaders from the marginalized.
152
Thank you.
153
Second, negative speaker.
154
My test.
155
All right.
156
Salutations, honorable adjudicators, esteemed affirmatives, and fellow speakers of the negative side.
157
I am Dalton Emanuel Mojica from Southville International School and Colleges,
158
Philippines, here to extend the debate and argue against the motion that leaders should be selected from the margins.
159
So first of all, I would like to start off with a great point.
160
We are not saying that we should not pick people who are marginalized, but we are saying that we should choose people who are qualified.
161
We should not pick people who are marginalized just because they are marginalized.
162
I would like to point you to a definition.
163
meritocracy.
164
It is a political system in which economic
165
and political power are vested in individual people based on talent and their capabilities of leading a country.
166
And with this,
왜 이 영상으로 말하기 연습을 해야 할까요?
이 영상은 리더십을 주제로 한 토론을 담고 있으며, 그 과정에서 자연스럽게 다양한 영어 표현을 접할 수 있습니다. 특히, 영어 쉐도잉 연습을 통해 발음을 개선하고, 비판적 사고를 바탕으로 한 논리적 표현 방식을 익힐 수 있습니다. 연사들이 의견을 나누는 방식과 각기 다른 관점을 제시하는 것을 들으면서 실제 대화에서 어떻게 효과적으로 소통할 수 있는지를 배울 수 있습니다. 이런 이유로 유튜브 영어 공부에서 이 영상을 활용하는 것이 매우 유익합니다.
문맥 속의 문법과 표현
연사들이 사용한 몇 가지 중요한 문법 구조 및 표현은 다음과 같습니다:
- “be resolved that”: 이는 공식적인 주장이나 motion을 제기할 때 주로 사용됩니다. 예를 들어, "be resolved that leaders should be selected from the margins."와 같이 사용됩니다.
- “we believe that”: 개인의 주장이나 신념을 표현할 때 효과적입니다. 덕분에 자신의 입장을 분명히 하고 논리를 전개하는 데 도움을 줍니다.
- “would like to”: 이는 공손하게 자신의 의견이나 요구를 표현할 때 유용한 표현입니다. “We would like to dispute the idea...”와 같이 어떤 아이디어에 대한 반박을 제시할 때 쓸 수 있습니다.
이처럼 자연스러운 문맥 속에서 문법과 표현을 익히면, 실제 상황에서도 유용하게 활용할 수 있습니다. shadowspeaks의 원리를 적용하여 반복적으로 연습하는 것이 좋습니다.
일반적인 발음 함정
영상에서 등장하는 몇 가지 까다로운 단어와 발음은 다음과 같습니다:
- “margins”: 이 단어는 다양한 발음이 있으며, 특히 ‘마진스’라 발음할 때 여타 음절에서 소리가 흐려질 수 있습니다. 주의가 필요합니다.
- “selected”: '선택된'이라는 의미로, 발음할 때 's'와 'e' 사이의 발음을 잘 구분해야 합니다. 데베이트에서 주의 깊게 들어보고 연습하세요.
- “corruption”: '부패'라는 뜻으로, ‘c’에서 ‘o’로 넘어갈 때 자연스럽게 흐를 수 있도록 연습하세요.
이러한 발음 트랩을 인지하고 연습하면, 더욱 자연스럽고 명확한 영어 발음을 구사할 수 있습니다. shadow speak 방식으로 꾸준히 연습하여 발음을 개선하세요.
쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법
쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.