Shadowing Practice: Biotech Story Time With Tal Zaks, M.D. (Part 1) - Learn English Speaking with Video
Kies een oefenmodus
Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.
724 zinnen
Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.
1
you know arrows i was uh i was thinking before i came into the studio today
2
that i should have i was thinking i should have made
3
a large bag of popcorn for today's episode do you know
4
why why do you remember the last time we talked with tall tall zacks uh it's been a while
5
but i remember being wrapped wrapped entertained uh the stories were
6
uh just titillating right like i was on the edge of my seat uh sometimes in disbelief
7
and i thought this is a popcorn worthy episode alas i
8
did not bring any popcorn to my chagrin i'm sorry next
9
time bad planning a lot of people know him as the
10
guy who was chief medical officer at moderna before during
11
and after the company became a household name thanks to its mRNA -based answer to COVID.
12
But even without that gold star next to his name, Dr. Tal Zaks has built a fascinating career as a physician scientist,
13
an investor, a board member, and a biotech builder.
14
Today, he's CEO and chair of the board of directors at Exilio Therapeutics, a non -executive director at five companies, I think, including Teva Pharmaceuticals,
15
a private equity partner at Orbimed, and probably holds a few more titles
16
that i'm missing storyteller he's a he's a not
17
that we're setting the bar too high for right now
18
but he is a prolific storyteller dr seuss over here i'm matt pillar
19
and i'm anna rose welch
20
and on today's episode of the business of biotech it's story time with fall
21
so stay tuned
22
because the stories tall tells are not tall tells although i
23
guess they would be tall tells just not in the way
24
you think i meant it that's a new level you didn't see
25
that coming and
26
that really hit me over the head like a shovel his
27
stories are packed with biotech business building insights gained over a
28
career spent uh spanning leadership roles at gsk sanofi teva moderna orbamed
29
and now exilio therapeutics
30
and probably like i said a whole lot more tall welcome
31
to the show it's a real pleasure to be here we are absolutely thrilled to have you
32
and as i said i i'm I'm sorry if we set the bar too high, but the last time we chatted, Hannah Rose and I came away thinking like this guy has got
33
so many great anecdotes that not only like not only great stories, but like a lot of meat in them.
34
Right.
35
A lot of meat for biotech builders.
36
So we're really looking forward to the conversation today.
37
We have a ton to get through.
38
I don't know if we'll do it all in one one episode.
39
We might have to revisit with a part two.
40
But before we get into the Exilio story, I want to get to know you a little bit and intro you to the audience.
41
And so and I'm going to go way back.
42
We're going to rewind the clock quite a ways.
43
You immigrated to the U .S from Israel to do your postdoc at the National Cancer Institute
44
and presumably at the time practice medicine.
45
I mean, you're you know, you you practice medicine back then.
46
Well, when you when you made that move, was it was that your sole intention career wise to come over here and practice?
47
uh to be fair back in the day i just had
48
an opportunity to come to the mecca of scientific research now
49
i trained in the early days as a physician scientist an
50
md phd it wasn't really a track i sort of built it
51
because i got interested in an area of medicine uh that's called tumor immunology back then it wasn't the thing
52
that it has become since but i was super curious
53
and i had a wonderful opportunity to come to the lab of dr steve rosenberg at the national cancer institute
54
and you know as an immigrant coming from across to the mecca of the nih
55
you don't really think what's going to happen next you just say boy i'm at a place
56
that has really redefined our understanding of immuno -oncology benefits for patients with cancer
57
and the sky's the limit
58
and i have to tell you i am to this day a very proud immigrant to this country and really
59
if anything have been fortunate to take advantage of an ecosystem
60
where truly the sky's the limit in terms of what we can achieve for uh for patients for ourselves for mankind
61
so i in all honestly i knew i was a physician i had some interest in science
62
and i just wanted to explore it yeah you just went and
63
that ecosystem has opened up a lot of doors you know
64
on in the periphery in front of you maybe in some cases behind you
65
and you've taken you've seemingly taken advantage of every door that's
66
presented itself well to be fair uh i have to say
67
the first three years were actually marked by a lot of failure uh
68
and in fact after three years there i you know, try to get a cancer vaccine to work.
69
I actually proved why it didn't work.
70
I tried to understand immuno -oncology.
71
We had a theory as to what could be what what are today called checkpoints.
72
We actually debunked it and it wasn't that.
73
And after kind of three years, I said, oh, you know.
74
I better go back and finish my clinical training.
75
Yeah.
76
And and it taught me the value of scientific depth.
77
But I can tell you years later, when I came upon a saying by the late Nelson Mandela, it's become my favorite quote of all time.
78
And he said, in life, I've either succeeded or I've learned.
79
To be fair, in those early days, I had a lot of learnings.
80
Still do to this day.
81
Yeah, it's a it's I mean, it's a common refrain, but it's it's it's like there's a dichotomy.
82
It's like there's a it's a common refrain, but it's all too often forgotten in this in this industry.
83
Right well and i think you know we tend to just package it as well
84
that was a failure instead of a learning right it's really just a terminology change
85
but you know reframing that reframing it after you i do think i do think
86
that when things don't go as expected that's actually when you grow
87
and when you learn the most in fact in a roundabout way um
88
and we'll come back to this later one of the fascinating
89
things for me to reflect on covid was here's something
90
that succeeded beyond my wildest expectations so you know what did i learn from
91
that because there are learnings from that success
92
but it's actually uh you know maybe counterintuitively it's easier to
93
learn from failures than it is it is from successes yeah uh sticking back in
94
that in that time frame after you completed your residency at temple
95
and your fellowship at penn you joined gsk to work in clinical development translational medicine
96
so tell us tell us why you made that transition to industry
97
i have to say
98
that was a completely non -obvious move to me at the
99
time um i had spent many years in training in academia
100
you know an internship another internship a residency a postdoc a fellowship
101
and uh uh in in as i was finishing my fellowship
102
i i actually uh won an asco young investigator award this
103
thing handed out to fellows you've got a little bit of research budget
104
and and and i came home really proud my son who was 12 looks up at me
105
and says dad what's what's all the commotion about i was clearly excited
106
and i look at him
107
and said well you know i just i just won this young uh investigator award
108
and the kid looks up at me
109
and says dad what do you mean young investigator award like how old are you
110
and i look at the kid
111
and he had a point uh you know i was in my 38 39
112
and and he's 12 and heading up to college in a few years
113
and and here i am having fun training learning seeing patients
114
but it really kind of brought it home
115
that okay maybe it's time to actually go do something in the world and
116
while I trained myself thinking I was going to be an
117
academic physician I started my life actually as a pediatric intensive care unit nurse
118
and I worked as a nurse on that side of the patient's bed
119
if you will as I was training to be physician
120
and i always appreciated teamwork
121
and you know the academic uh world is driven by the axiom
122
that there can only be one first author a few years before
123
that i interviewed at a very prestigious institution and for fellowship
124
and they said great yeah we'll have you as a fellow
125
and with a little bit of chutzpah i asked them well you know
126
if i come here as a fellow how quickly can i be faculty
127
and they said oh okay let's let's think about
128
that they took it up the flagpole
129
and down came the answer it said look we we looked
130
at your uh resume yeah you did a postdoc at the nih you had some papers great
131
but you actually had more second authorships than first authorship
132
so we're not really sure about you
133
and i have to tell you i like i really took
134
that to heart because i was actually more proud of the second authorships because
135
when you're a second authorship it means you got to be
136
part of something somebody else did the work you got to play a role in enjoying it leading
137
and thinking through it uh while you were doing other stuff as well uh
138
and so when the time came to sort of make the career move the the notion
139
that uh i could actually go do it in a more team -based environment where really the purpose was getting better drugs.
140
I just found that appealing.
141
And, you know, if you take a medicine and you open it up, you know, whether it's tabs or a vial,
142
you'll see there's a piece of paper rolled up in that that most people throw away.
143
Well, if you open up that paper, it's actually the label.
144
It's what the FDA says you should use it.
145
And if you look at where, you know, who signed off on that label, where do these drugs come from?
146
Well, they don't come from the university and they don't come from the National Institutes of Health.
147
They actually come from drug companies.
148
And so if you, as your mission in life, want to actually do better, especially in oncology with the state of affair of drugs,
149
while we have very good drugs, we should and could do better and you want to be part of that doing better, then you go to where the action is.
150
You go to where these medicines are made to have an impact.
151
And that's sort of what propelled me to, despite having trained for so long, to be an academic physician, to actually shift gears and try it out in industry.
152
Speaking of being in the place that makes the medicines, you continue to play your hand at a place that makes a lot of medicines in Teva.
153
You've been there since 2021 as a board member.
154
It's one of the world's largest generics companies.
155
Tell us about that experience and how it's informed your take on the market.
156
I have to tell you, I'm super proud of that.
157
And I'm proud at a very deep level,
158
because what Teva does is a reflection of the breadth of contribution to our industry that's often lost
159
when we think of purely innovative companies.
160
The innovation at the heart of the ecosystem is protected by intellectual property.
161
And that is the engine that's allowed us to be
162
so productive in the U .S in the last 50 years as the leaders of the world of therapeutic benefit.
163
But the beauty is that that
164
that contract with society actually plays out in the long run once the intellectual property expires and you now have generic medicines.
165
And, you know, the stem pill I take every morning
166
and the fact that my late father managed to live for 40 years with chronic heart disease and, you know, taking five, six, seven different meds.
167
Those were all generics or most of them were.
168
And by now, all of them are.
169
Right.
170
Right.
171
And so the benefit of the previous era is now available to society at a fraction of the cost.
172
Thanks to that.
173
And in the discussion that we have about, you know, cost of drugs and intellectual property and all the other stuff,
174
we often forget that there's a very long tail of benefit
175
that we just keep raising the bar
176
and then the price goes down years later for everybody to enjoy
177
and that's worldwide and
178
so i take tremendous pride in teva's contribution both on the
179
innovative side we are an innovative company we we do develop innovative medicines
180
but also on the generic underpinning of that
181
that provides drugs for hundreds of millions of people every day freeze up right it frees up cost right
182
and money to be able to cover the innovative stuff right the the breaking, the breaking new drugs on the market that, that aren't as cheap as generics, right.
183
Or as, as biosimilars.
184
So it's really, it pays into that innovation in its own way.
185
Yeah.
186
It's good illustration of, uh, Dr. Zacks is, uh, I guess, um, the breadth of his portfolio, right?
187
Like the things, I mean, we're going to talk about Axelio here pretty, pretty soon, uh, doing some pretty novel and exciting things.
188
And he did obviously some pretty novel and exciting things uh beginning in 2015
189
when he took on the stint as cmo at moderna
190
so we could spend like i don't want to do this
191
i don't want to do this i want to get i want to give this its fair share
192
but we could spend a couple episodes talking about stories from
193
yes those moderna days of moderna age you know like not
194
to not to put too fine a point on it but you joined moderna in 2015
195
like just let that sink in for a minute what tell us about that like you you start like was this
196
was this a right place right time kind of situation was
197
it like you you saw something coming like what's what's the
198
story there how are you reading the tea leaves what's going on oh i wish i could be
199
that smart uh you know uh i i was listening to
200
a podcast a few uh weeks ago general petreus uh made
201
a comment he referenced uh the late uh long late roman philosopher Seneca who said that luck is when preparation meets opportunity.
202
So in a way, I was prepared.
203
I had spent a significant chunk of my life by then in oncology drug development.
204
As you mentioned, I started GSK, ended up running Santa Fe's global oncology team.
205
And at that point, I had sort of the opportunity to kind of look around at the biotech system and figure out,
206
well, what's new that's coming and what are some interesting ways to fill our pipeline
207
and up until that point i was a medical oncologist through
208
and through i cared about better medicines for cancer patients i
209
didn't care about where they were coming from the proof point
210
i actually spent a couple years at cephalon cephalon had developed
211
two of the oldest poisons known to man as a very effective cancer chemotherapies.
212
One is arsenic trioxide, which cures a subset of leukemia.
213
So Fine by me, right?
214
The clinical benefit is what speaks to me.
215
But as you're a scientist and you get sort of curious about where's innovation coming from,
216
I had the opportunity to look within the Boston ecosystem at a whole bunch of stuff.
217
And I came upon Moderna and the idea of mRNA.
218
And it made me stop and sort of think differently about translating science into medicine
219
so by then i sort of realized that i was my happy place
220
if you will is is between the science
221
and the medicine not pure science for the sake of science not just pure medical practice even though i did
222
that a number of years as a volunteer at the philadelphia va
223
but it's actually that in between and moderna was had an emerging interesting idea
224
and platform that was very orthogonal to my thinking.
225
It was not, hey, we have a cancer patient and cancer here as a need.
226
Can you make a medicine?
227
It was we have this innovative idea of a new platform.
228
And if we can translate it into medicine, what would those medicines be?
229
And that's a very different way of asking the question.
230
Now, in full transparency in 2015, all the data we had were just an animal model in mice uh
231
and most people thought this thing was never going to work uh i have been fortunate in life that in
232
that uh my wife who's the smart one in the equation
233
actually has a phd in biochemistry you know she looks at me
234
and says well you know it's all mrna it's high risk
235
but hey if this speaks to you go for it
236
and i was in a place in life where uh it was time to take risk
237
you know and the way to think about it um i had a big birthday
238
that year and one of the things that happens
239
when you reach a certain age is
240
that you stop looking at the next career thing you're going
241
to do you start looking at time in reverse you said okay
242
and the time
243
that left to me in this world what do i want to get done what do i want to accomplish
244
and and then you realize you'd rather
245
fail or learn trying to address a big question than just do something small and incremental
246
uh this was a big question this was a question
247
that most people thought was not going to work uh i
248
mean i can show you nature papers back in the day uh referencing moderna
249
and theranos in the same sentence for crying out loud um
250
and and it was a very different way to kind of challenge yourself to go make medicine
251
so i i signed on because i thought that if this would work
252
we should be able to go from an idea on a
253
whiteboard to a medicine being studied in man at a fraction of the time
254
and the cost of what traditional drug development takes.
255
And it had such potential in terms of a platform that could lend itself to once you do the first one,
256
the other ones should actually work that repeatability that is unheard of in traditional pharma.
257
And in fact, we'd actually proven it.
258
One of the things the public is not aware of is that, you know, the COVID vaccine was not Moderna's first vaccine.
259
It was actually the ninth virus against which we tried to raise neutralizing antibodies in humans.
260
And our success rate for the prior eight had been eight out of eight.
261
So COVID for us inside was was not a surprise, actually, that it worked.
262
There were a lot of other things surprising about it.
263
But we knew this platform could actually get there.
264
In fact, for years, we have been working with an urgency to get there in time.
265
So I really like this point.
266
You know, when you joined Moderna, I think the instinct there was to really be part of a foundation, right?
267
You wanted to build the foundation for mRNA medicines.
268
And instead of making sort of incremental advancements, really tried to develop this proof point for mRNA as an actual therapeutic, as a vaccine candidate it
269
but i'm really i'm curious to to learn more about you
270
know your priorities as a cmo stepping into a company at this time
271
when mrna was again as you said compared to theranos right
272
like it wasn't a household name a lot of people were hesitant to believe
273
that it would work it was high risk you know what were your priorities as a cmo
274
when you stepped into this into this company and
275
and in these early days what did that what did
276
that look like
277
and entail i think uh a lot of moderna's success stems from two factors the first is the courage that those
278
that came there before me um stefan boncel steven hoog uh to ask the question don't you know suspend disbelief
279
if it works what can you do of it?
280
And then the very thoughtful risk mitigation approach to try
281
and take several shots on goal in different dimensions to try to work yourself across different things that could work, but you don't know that they could.
282
In those days, they spanned infectious disease these vaccines, they spanned.
283
uh oncology efforts they spanned rare disease uh one of the things
284
that i personally started uh shortly after joining was the personalized cancer vaccine uh
285
and you know we can come back to that uh you know
286
if you want a cliffhanger into this episode we can talk about cancer vaccines
287
because it's a fascinating story in fact it's much more fascinating to me scientifically than than even covid
288
but when i joined uh and and this is where your popcorn will will find a place
289
when i joined in march of 2015 uh stefan von selva
290
ceo asked me to give uh an all -employee town hall uh three months into my tenure
291
so in june of 2015
292
and he wanted me to explain to the employees there were
293
about 300 people at modern at the time why was it
294
that a unicorn on paper company in boston uh
295
so secretive is actually the first clinical trial is going to
296
be a vaccine against the pandemic flu threat out of china
297
that was our first phase one we started at the end of 2015. and
298
so what we did back in those days is we used
299
to rent the the auditorium next door uh it was actually
300
a movie theater the kenthal square theater um we used to
301
rent it out for random thursday afternoon we'd give all the employees free popcorn they'd sit
302
when the executives would get on stage and
303
and you know tell the story of what the company was up to in the last couple months
304
and so it's my turn june of 2015
305
and i told us to fund great we're in a movie
306
theater i'm going to take some license with my presentation i'm
307
not going to use your usual slide template i'm going to make believe we're in a movie and
308
so i get up everybody's with popcorn i'm the new cmo
309
said guys pretend this is a movie the the theater goes dark
310
and on the screen comes a slide
311
and the title of the movie is how moderna will save
312
the world june of 2015 the next slide is a pg -13 green rated thing right to get everybody
313
and then the rest of the presentation
314
started with the spanish flu in 1918 goes through the fact
315
that still back then in 2015 we don't have a good
316
vaccine response we don't have good antivirals all we have is
317
these masks these picture of people walking around in masks
318
and i flashed those pictures up in june of 2015
319
and basically the gist of the talk was our platform it's
320
clear the low -hanging fruit is going to be vaccines for a whole host of technical reasons
321
and we owe it to ourselves to the company to society to make sure
322
that we're advancing these vaccines both those that are of perceived commercial value
323
and those that could be of public benefit
324
and in fact that's what we proceeded to do we had advanced a few candidates
325
that have commercial background i mean cmv right now uh is already in in phase three there uh
326
but in parallel we worked on flu we worked on zika in 2017 that's
327
when part of the u .s government got to go and
328
and we built this track record of the ability of this platform to actually execute towards a pandemic need uh
329
and i'll tell you it came full circle In September of 2019,
330
Stefan and I went down for our sort of annual meeting with the NH folks, who was there at the time,
331
and they came to know us through the Zika pandemic in 2017, and we started to collaborate.
332
And by then, we had shown
333
that the mRNA vaccine could actually work to protect an animal model of a cousin of COVID called MERS.
334
uh and i we were telling uh the team there about the most recent data we had
335
and i remember at some point dr fauci kind of stops me
336
and says so are you telling me this is the best vaccine platform i've ever seen uh -huh
337
and you know me being me i basically looked at the same dr fauci yes
338
and let me explain why and and and so the upshot of
339
that meeting was actually that Moderna and the NIH were going to form a collaboration to pick a virus,
340
something nobody ever heard of.
341
We'll just send you the sequence.
342
You guys can start the clock, see how fast you can make a first batch, and we'll run the phase one clinical trial.
343
And in November, the NIH, November of 2019,
344
Dr. Fauci actually published a paper talking about pandemic preparedness of various platforms
345
and mentions mrna there as the leading platform ready to serve in a pandemic whether it's influenza
346
or a related respiratory virus
347
and as we were talking to the nh trying to figure out what would be
348
that test case somebody started coughing into wuhan
349
and the rest is oh my gosh uh you realize how
350
much fodder you're you're providing for conspiracy theorists right now dr
351
zacks i mean really takes time to a whole new level where's my popcorn i know
352
but i'm curious so i i i can tell you just to finish the note
353
because i i have to say uh you know I got to know all sorts of conspiracy theorists back in 2020.
354
One of my, I think, learnings from the whole era was how critical it is
355
that we build public trust and understanding and what it is we do.
356
If if if we do everything we do in translating science into medicine, but the public doesn't trust it, then it will have been for not.
357
And I spent a lot of energy as the chief medical officer back in those days.
358
And I still believe it's part of each and every one of our ethical obligation to be out there,
359
to tell the story, to explain to people where does this stuff come from?
360
This is not black voodoo.
361
This is not some magic mystery.
362
This is people hard at work trying to understand the science and trying to translate that science.
363
And we did we did a couple of things that were I'm really proud of back in that era.
364
The first was in as the phase three trial was going on.
365
I remember being on a on a on a webinar with the National Academy of Sciences of New York State, and they asked me, OK, at the end of it, there was a Q &A.
366
And they said, Dr. Zax, what are you worried about?
367
And and they expected me to say, oh, I don't know if it's going to work this.
368
Then the other said, look, I'm not worried about safety.
369
I'm not worried about efficacy.
370
The one thing that keeps me up at night is that our trial enrolls people of diverse enough
371
representation of the great country of ours so that when the data comes out, people can relate to the veracity of those data and can see themselves in the trial.
372
And I think Moderna went on to really pioneer enrollment of diverse populations in phase three and in all subsequent trials,
373
partnering with both national and regional sort of experts
374
and leaders of the community to make sure that clinical research is both accessible to everybody and representative of everybody.
375
And the other interesting thing was, again, as I was thinking, how do we relay this message to the public?
376
I actually convened a small ethics panel for the executive team at Moderna.
377
You're not going to find this on any website.
378
This was not done for external consumption.
379
This was really to get external advice of people like Art Kaplan
380
and other experts in ethics on how should we be thinking about our protocol.
381
And one of the experts there, a friend of mine, Ann Beal, Ann is a wonderful black pediatrician from New York City.
382
She was the first chief patient safety or chief patient officer at Santa Fe.
383
She's today on the board of GSK.
384
And I brought Ann in and Ann looks at me and says, Tal, I've been in your shoes.
385
The only way you can do this is to be transparent to the point of discomfort
386
and i listened and i said that's going to be the motto of our medical affairs organization
387
and in the ensuing weeks we had a lot of internal
388
conversation i was pushing to have the phase three protocol of the covet vaccine actually published
389
and companies don't usually publish protocols uh on the web certainly not unredacted
390
and certainly not as the trial is still ongoing
391
and we finally prevailed and in september we we we went out uh
392
and we put the entire protocol on the web
393
and i'm very happy to say
394
that all the pharma followed some of them within hours we
395
got one of the most favorable articles ever written on pharma on the new york times in september of 2020
396
but more importantly journalists who used to call me up in those days
397
and say hey you know what are you not telling me
398
how many patients are you going to sea etc suddenly the
399
conversation was tall on page 87 paragraph two of your protocol
400
can you explain to me how the power of the statistics work right
401
so you could actually take now the conversation with the public
402
and i you know i have tremendous respect for to journalists
403
because at the end of the day you're the ones who
404
translate this to do what the public actually gets to listen and and figure out.
405
And so it changed the dialogue that we had with the public on what that protocol was actually trying to do.
406
He says one of the most favorable articles on pharma, the New York Times is, I'm thinking like a favorable article on pharma is a win,
407
and it doesn't have to be one of the most, right?
408
I mean, if it's...
409
Penny one is a win.
410
If it's 52 % favorable, that's a win.
411
No, I really, you know, so I think you kind of answered this, this question that I have.
412
But so, you know, you built this foundation, you weren't concerned necessarily about mRNA being efficacious and safe.
413
The big priority for you as the pandemic started to hit in the in the year after, right, as you released your vaccine was really making sure
414
that you were telling the full story and that everyone who needed to
415
and wanted to see that data could actually access it and be able to able to understand that story, you know.
416
Was that perhaps the biggest part of your leadership at
417
that time as a CMO in an MRNA company once it kind of became a public good, right, a publicly known household name?
418
Or how did you see your priorities sort of shifting as MRNA suddenly became an actual medicine
419
that was commercialized and you had to continue moving forward and being a CMO of this company?
420
Yeah, I think that's true.
421
So if you if I look back at 2020 and now, you know, with the wisdom of insight, it really is there's two parts to that year.
422
And the first part, when we sort of had to muster up
423
and figure out how to get this done
424
and how to do it in a way that would avoid all the obvious pitfalls.
425
And by the way, how to do it while learning to work in a completely novel manner.
426
That was all consuming.
427
I mean, if you would have told me in 2019
428
that I'd be developing a vaccine in 2020 and I'd be doing it with a team of dozens of people,
429
all of whom I had hired through Zoom and never met.
430
And I would be doing it with three government agencies who had to align on protocols and endpoints,
431
none of whom got in the room together with each other, let alone me um
432
and i do it in record time such
433
that we went from an idea on a whiteboard to an
434
authorized vaccine in 11 months i would have thought yeah that's that's that's impossible
435
and yet and yet we did it and
436
so that's where you kind of there's learnings from that success in terms of how we work
437
across uh individuals and what can work with remote working
438
and zoom and what actually takes people to get in the room together to align on things
439
and and i think we as a society are still learning that lesson
440
but it's clearly i think for us the development of the vaccine was probably a unique edge case
441
that everybody else experienced in terms of what can you get done remotely
442
and how to go about building a an effective remote working
443
environment the second half of the year I think once the phase three was sort of rolling on its tracks,
444
and then I had to pay attention to two things.
445
I think one of them is, as you said, being the public face, making sure that I can tell the story, that I can represent Moderna.
446
We had very critical FDA meetings, advisory committee meetings cdc meetings etc the other one
447
that is a story that's not often told actually has to do with safety
448
and what people sort of don't realize is and probably this is
449
this is a good explanation for some of the conspiracy theorists out there
450
The mRNA vaccines are the most intensively studied from a safety perspective, medical intervention in the history of humanity.
451
We have dosed, I don't know, one, two billion people with these medicines.
452
We've done it with the most modern tools for data collection ever available to mankind.
453
We've done it with reporting through all forms of modern communication technology.
454
We've done it using the best tools available today of big data analyses for any kind of signal.
455
And the proof is that when you had very rare adverse events
456
that happen at a rate of 1 to 150 or 1 to 200 ,000 cases, those were picked up within months.
457
And that's what happened to the AstraZeneca vaccine, the J &J vaccine, if you recall back.
458
And even Moderna had this this very low signal of the myocarditis that had been picked up and then validated.
459
So there's I don't think there's anything significant about the safety of these vaccines that we don't know.
460
It just doesn't make any sense given the way we collected.
461
And I can tell you the amount of man hours, hundreds of millions that it actually cost to collect the safety data.
462
That is the iceberg under the water.
463
And to the degree that I was sort of steering the ship in those days, that was the thing that I had to pay careful attention to,
464
to make sure that we are actually collecting the data as required by regulations.
465
And by the way, global regulators around the world would have weekly teleconferences without me, FDA, the Europeans, et cetera, et cetera.
466
And they would be talking about the safety of our vaccines and what it is that they get direct reporting.
467
And when you think about it.
468
just to give you a numbers on it
469
when we started down this path we took a look at the previous vaccines launched
470
and we thought that we would get about three to four times the reporting of adverse events
471
that any other vaccine would happen that's what we geared up to
472
when it actually got rolled out we got about 15 folds i mean i don't remember the exact numbers
473
but it was over tenfold what we had expected
474
because of this heightened sense of vigilance because of the public scrutiny
475
and all rightly so and it was our job to react to
476
that collect the data sift through it and make sure
477
that we report it accurately and so that's a story that's not often told
478
but for me was critical so that i can be out there
479
and and and say yep you know
480
if you want to know what the side effects are you remember
481
that fda label go back and pull it up because if there's anything we saw by law, it's on there.
482
And we're having those conversations with the FDA to tell them about it.
483
Yeah.
484
You know, very few, it occurs to me, the very few, very few CXOs in a similar,
485
will ever find themselves in a similar position where that one moment, moment in time, you know,
486
really throws the afterburners of your career on, right?
487
Like very few people are going to see that and very
488
and fewer still fewer still people are going to survive it
489
come out the other end like you know hey the contributions
490
there being biotech yeah i i stand on it um
491
so you know it goes without saying that that
492
that had to have been a supreme confidence builder even even in your already very successful
493
and advanced career that had to be a supreme confidence builder
494
but and and as i said we could talk about covid for like the next three hours
495
but um i want to i want to kind of shift back to like what, what makes Dr. Talzak's, Talzak's who he is today and,
496
and kind of keeps him moving forward.
497
So taking sort of, sort of that specific experience off the table, what other inflection points during your, you know, CXO, you know,
498
VP, even research experiences with your previous companies have in a similar,
499
but maybe more muted, more muted to the public way influenced, uh, your confidence in, in your,
500
uh, career trajectory, you know, your decisions to go on and be a, be a board guy, be a founder, be a, you know, uh, the, the leader of Exilio, for instance, now.
501
Uh, it's a combination of factors, you know, it starts with the absolute joy.
502
of seeing clinical benefit come at the other end.
503
I'll tell you a story back when I was at Sanofi.
504
We had a drug that was in phase one, just the first phase of clinical research.
505
And it was, it targets something called CD38 for patients with a type of blood cancer called multiple myeloma.
506
And this phase one had been going on for very long because we started at very low doses.
507
We were going very, very slowly, and it wasn't clear that it was going to work, so people weren't excited to enroll.
508
And one day, the team comes back and tells me, you know, you remember that 70 -year -old patient that we had, and he'd just gotten a couple of doses?
509
Well, he decided to go off protocol, and he's no longer participating.
510
I'm like, why?
511
You know, we just lost the data point.
512
This is hard enough as it is.
513
And they say, well, you know, here's what happened.
514
We gave him two doses
515
or three doses of the drug he went into a complete
516
response he's 70 year old he's been feeling like crap for
517
the last decade of his life he finally got the opportunity to go to europe
518
and take the summer off and do that trip he's been dreaming up
519
so he decided he's not coming for his next dose he's going off to europe to live right
520
and then you go okay i guess i guess that's okay
521
that's what we strive for right improve quality of life exactly
522
so uh so so it's those stories that that you sort of
523
that you live for on the you know i i think i've been fortunate to to have mentors and colleagues
524
to be able to talk to and have have sort of steered me right whether it's people like steve Rosenberg,
525
who is still there at the NCI now 50 years as the towering modern giant father of immuno -oncology.
526
I mean, a lot of therapies we see today, the T -cell therapies all started in his lab back in the day.
527
I've been fortunate to have a supportive wife who understands what I do
528
And more than that will actually tell me to my face
529
when I'm talking nonsense and tell me the stuff I don't want to hear.
530
And I've been blessed with having colleagues, you know, one of the.
531
privileges that we have in the world in this ecosystem is
532
that the end game is something tangible
533
that is easy to be passionate about we're not making widgets
534
we're making people feel better live longer we're trying to cure diseases we're trying to prevent horrible illnesses it is easy to get
535
that as a rallying cry what's hard is then to figure
536
out okay with all the unknowns in biology along the way how do you do
537
that now in the i i think this in in this phase of my career
538
one of the things i learned at moderna sort of through
539
doing is the importance of aligning return on investment with uh with kind of innovation and doing good for patients
540
and it sounds trite but it's actually not obvious and it's not trivial to get right the
541
Our ecosystem has been so productive, but you have to understand the drivers of this ecosystem,
542
because if you look at other economic models of trying to translate innovation into health care benefits, they have not worked nearly as well.
543
And so I judge it by the results
544
and I am deeply respectful of the underlying economic ecosystem
545
that rewards innovation and rewards investment in high risk areas with a return on that investment.
546
you know i was um i was kindly invited to a recent uh summit
547
that uh one of the national academy of sciences medicine
548
and engineering had about how to better align uh investing in innovation
549
and therapeutics with unmet need and
550
and one of my points to them was i i'm not ashamed of saying return on investment
551
when we talk about drug pricing uh you know we we we often talk about
552
kind of reimbursement and reimbursement is a term that is fit for
553
when i go out and have a meal
554
and i need somebody to pay for the meal we don't
555
work for reimbursement let's be fair we work for a return
556
on the investment my shareholders my limited partners right now in
557
venture a lot of them are pension funds they give me
558
a pot of money seven years later i need to give them a bigger pot of money back
559
because they got to go pay those pensions that's what propels our system
560
that is commercial investment
561
and for me since i was fortunate to never actually do
562
anything strictly for money uh i became super curious to understand
563
and immerse myself in an ecosystem where
564
that part of the value is actually a very objective
565
and legitimate yardstick um you know sweat equity
566
and capital equity tend to be rewarded differently i've sort of lived now through both
567
and uh when
568
when investors at moderna used to ask me well you know
569
what's the stock price should i invest is it too high
570
is it too low what's it going to i used to look at them
571
and say look you can do what you want with your
572
money i'm actually investing something much more valuable than money at moderna
573
and that's my time on earth uh
574
so you be the judge of your money i think sweat equity
575
and capital equity are different
576
and these days i'm curious to immerse myself in this side of the business of biotech
577
if i may uh to understand what that return on investment looks like
578
and how do i best align it with the things
579
that i still inherently care about
580
which is translating science into medicine yeah yeah in the in
581
that vein i mean one of the first questions that investors ask,
582
one of the first questions that regulatory agencies ask when they're looking at investigational therapeutics is about unmet medical needs.
583
What does it address?
584
Lots of research in biotech builders thus go about their business searching for solutions to unmet medical needs.
585
Why not?
586
It potentially wins the favor of markets and agencies.
587
But you, on the other hand, And to have shared a somewhat, you know, at face value,
588
perhaps contrarian opinion that unmet medical need is not really what drives innovation in this industry.
589
So I guess I'd ask you for some explanation of that philosophy.
590
Explain yourself.
591
Yeah.
592
Well, you know, it struck me as I was starting out at GSK.
593
I remember at one point we said, okay, we're going to focus on lung cancer because it's an unmet need.
594
And being the flippant young guy that I was, I told the head of the division that actually if he wanted to have an impact on lung cancer, he didn't need to do much work.
595
GSK already had the best drug in their portfolio at the time.
596
And he goes, yeah, what is it?
597
He said, it's Nicorette.
598
unmet need hasn't changed.
599
And so we've had, you know, we've had cancer for eons.
600
And so it's not unmet need per se, that's driven all the new medicines we have.
601
So it's actually new understandings in science and technology that then that are driven primarily by curiosity.
602
You know, when Caitlin Carrico, whom I have a ton of respect for, started fiddling around with the structure of RNA to understand why, in some cases, was it killing cells
603
and what could she do to the chemistry to stop it from killing cells and get progene expressed.
604
She came upon a really interesting discovery, but nobody knew what to do with it.
605
In fact, the IP lay fallow for years.
606
They kind of licensed it to somebody else.
607
And it wasn't until people who actually said, huh, there's something that maybe we can get translated.
608
And even then, the first folks who picked that up, their idea of what to do with it was just following their curiosity.
609
Oh, can I reprogram the stem cell to go be something else?
610
Which is super interesting scientifically, but we still don't know how to make a medicine out of it.
611
And so for me, that bit of translation in the middle, pure innovation is opens up the potential.
612
That's the curiosity driven.
613
That's basic science.
614
That's basic technology.
615
When Bob Langer discovered that he could make lipid nanoparticles,
616
and Bob is a legendary MIT professor who's the father of the modern lipid nanoparticle and frankly, one of the fathers of the current ecosystem,
617
as we know it, of Boston Biotech.
618
And that's because of his deep understanding that when he discovered he could do something, and that something was everybody else thought he couldn't do it and shouldn't be possible,
619
that opened up a wonderful world of intellectual property.
620
And his understanding of the value of intellectual property
621
and the ability then to showcase what you could do with it to attract investment, that's what started the ball rolling.
622
And frankly, Moderna is sort of the culmination of the curiosity of people like Bob Langer,
623
like Caitlin Carrico, but actually putting it together in something that now is useful.
624
In fact, even in the early days of Moderna, we were exploring a whole bunch of different things and trying to make different types of therapies with it.
625
Moderna still is exploring the next frontier, whether it's cystic fibrosis or rare disease.
626
Now we know vaccines work and what happens is unmet need becomes the prism by
627
which you focus the light it's not the source of the light the source of the energy is actually
628
that scientific and technical innovation
629
and that's brilliant people who just are just super curious to go to go do something
630
or investigate something but the ability to then focus
631
that potential show through the prism of unmet need is what gets us medicine.
632
I think that's a really interesting distinction, especially given where we are right now,
633
I think with mRNA and you're positioning yourself right at the at the head of a brand new mRNA company, right? So,
634
you know, where there's still so much unknown unknowns right around the science of mRNA
635
and how it works and the delivery of it
636
and how it's going to perform in different cell types
637
and how we get it to express longer such there are
638
so many different scientific questions um
639
and we also you know tend to i think celebrate mra
640
at face value for the ability to manufacture more efficiently right
641
you've talked about this in comparison to other cell -based medicines right
642
so you know i'd be curious to get your sense on
643
the trajectory of innovation in this space what you really think is
644
are some of the the pieces here that are really driving further innovation in
645
that space right And that we are starting to funnel into unmet need to some extent to make these into therapies.
646
But what are those, you know, what's stoking the innovation in the mRNA space today that has you the most excited?
647
And what's at the root of that?
648
So I think the two current frontiers for mRNA medicines have to do still with the original questions in a way,
649
except we've moved the ball down the field.
650
The first is what cell can you get the mRNA into to mediate the protein translation
651
that would lead to a therapeutic benefit?
652
Vaccines were the low hanging fruit
653
because all you need is a needle in the arm and it goes to the local lymph nodes.
654
And all you need is a smidgen of protein produced and you mimic a viral infection and off you go.
655
The next place where you can put it is likely intravenous.
656
And I think that's also been proven.
657
And we've demonstrated, we at Moderna back in the day, shown that we can inject mRNA encoding just for an antibody intravenously
658
and it goes to the liver and it will make you antibody and you get therapeutic doses of antibody.
659
So can you get it to the lungs?
660
Can you get it to the bone marrow?
661
Can you get lupin nanoparticles into immune cells?
662
Can you get that into the brain?
663
I think that's some of the those are some of the frontier areas where people are trying to push the boundaries.
664
The next the other dimension is, well, what actually can you encode in the mRNA?
665
And initially, the place you start is the stuff that's best understood because you want to minimize risk.
666
And nothing is better understood than an antigen for a virus.
667
And, you know, it's no mistake
668
that all the COVID vaccines all use the exact same spike protein that everybody now knows what a spike protein is.
669
OK, that was easy.
670
But you could actually make proteins that are much more complicated.
671
You can make proteins that require several several subunits to come together
672
and you can make proteins that have not been seen in nature.
673
You can invent new proteins that have novel functions or improve on functions in very creative ways.
674
I am curious about that frontier personally, that's where Exilio comes in,
675
because for me, Exilio, this gene therapy company that I've now taken on,
676
is actually at the forefront.
677
It can combine innovation that comes from two different sources.
678
One of them is mRNA and a lipid nanoparticle as a drug format.
679
We can give it, it can go to cells where we understand can already go to, whether it's the liver or immune cells and it can translate protein
680
and you can actually give it repeatedly you can give it once twice three times in fact you know moderna
681
and their lead indications are have gone now for for about
682
a year in their first two diseases giving it every two to three weeks no problem
683
but the second thing is gene therapy can i actually integrate
684
a novel piece of genetic material in a safe way into the human genome to produce a therapeutic protein.
685
And then I don't have to keep treating that patient.
686
Well, that's as close to a cure as I know.
687
And so what this company
688
that I'm now running is trying to do is basically take
689
a page of evolution as a starting point of some elements that can actually do this in nature, but use modern tools of protein engineering to improve upon their utility
690
so that we can actually use mRNA
691
and a lipid nanoparticle as a way to bring gene therapy to the forefront
692
and do it not just by doing one or two small, you know, alterations of a genome,
693
but actually to insert an entire piece of missing genetic material and cure a kid with a genetic disease, for example.
694
And this, my friend, is where the cliffhanger comes in
695
because we do have a hard stop and
696
because my next series of questions we certainly cannot tackle in four minutes we cannot those questions those questions being
697
if curiosity is to be rewarded it it must be funded
698
who is funding curiosity who's willing to fund how do you
699
willing to fund these innovation come on in this market who's going to fun we're going to go down
700
that path we're going to get to know exilio uh in in detail
701
but we're not going to do it right now folks we're
702
going to do it in part two of this conversation
703
that i am um hereby committing dr tall zacks sorry you're
704
gonna have to come back to tell some more tall tales with pleasure colleagues
705
and we will have popcorn for that one we will have popcorn for that one.
706
I will bring the popcorn.
707
But for now, we are going to let you off the hook to meet your next commitment.
708
And I will be in touch with your people to get part two scheduled very, very quickly because I might get to run right on the heels of this one.
709
This has been a fascinating conversation and I appreciate your time.
710
Stay tuned.
711
I look forward to it.
712
Thank you so much.
713
Thank you.
714
Thank you.
715
So that's part one of Exilio Therapeutics, CEO and chair of the Board of directors, Dr. Tal Zaks.
716
I'm Matt Piller.
717
And I'm Anna Rose Welch.
718
You just listened to The Business of Biotech.
719
We're produced by Life Science Connect in support of a deep community of learning, solving, and sourcing solutions for biotech and life sciences leaders.
720
And if you haven't seen it yet, be sure to visit our video cast page under the listen and watch tab at bioprocessonline .com.
721
There you'll find this and hundreds of other videos of our interviews with biotech builders.
722
While you're there, subscribe to the Business of Biotech newsletter at bioprocessonline .com backslash B -O -B.
723
In the meantime, we'll see you next week, hopefully, for part two of Storytime with Tal.
724
And thanks for listening.
App downloaden
Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken
AI UitspraakScoor elke zin
IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid
WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op
WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt
FOR YOU
Aanbevolen Video
C11
402 zinnen
Inside a Biotech Company: Roles, Teams & Where You Could Fit In | EP 14
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
511 zinnen
Interview with Dr. Peter Schwartz | SADS Live Episode 23 | July 31, 2020
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
497 zinnen
The unstoppable green revolution: Adam Tooze on the "most dramatic story in the history of energy”
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
719 zinnen
View From The Top with Roelof Botha, Managing Partner of Sequoia Capital
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
715 zinnen
Alison Bashford: Secrets, history and psychology of the hand
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
118 zinnen
Stories of Transformation - Dominique
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
623 zinnen
The Only SaaS Moats Left in 2026
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
346 zinnen
Trust the Process: How to Design Teams That Actually Work
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
764 zinnen
Bill Ackman: Is Permanent Capital an Investor’s Biggest Edge? | Podcast | In Good Company
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
933 zinnen
My Joe Rogan Appearance: What I Learned (ft. Young Jamie & Viktor Hovland)
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
278 zinnen
Advancing Investment in Carbon Removal with Travis Caddy, Business Development Director at Eviden...
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
78 zinnen
Day in the Life as a Doctor
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les
Deze spreekles is gebaseerd op de video “Biotech Story Time With Tal Zaks, M.D”. Deze video bevat 724 zinnen en 9464 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 55:08. De spreker praat in een natuurlijk tempo van ongeveer 172 woorden per minuut, dicht bij een alledaags gesprek. 82% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden; de rest kun je beter vooraf bekijken.
Belangrijke woorden in deze video
15 woorden uit de video die het leren waard zijn, met uitspraak en betekenis:
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| vaccine zelfstandig naamwoord | /vækˈsin/ | vaccin, entstof |
| innovation zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˌɪn.əˈveɪ.ʃən/ | innovatie, vernieuwing |
| ecosystem zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈikoʊˌsɪstəm/ | ecosysteem |
| popcorn zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈpɑp.kɔɹn/ | gepofte maïs, pof-maïs |
| curious bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˈkjʊɹ.i.əs/ | nieuwsgierig |
| translate werkwoord | /tɹænzˈleɪt/ | vertalen, overzetten |
| physician zelfstandig naamwoord | /fəˈzɪʃən/ | dokter, arts |
| innovative bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˈɪn.əˌveɪtɪv/ | innovatief |
| curiosity zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˌkjʊɹ.iˈɑ.sə.ti/ | nieuwsgierigheid |
| builder zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈbɪl.dəɹ/ | bouwer, bouwster |
| equity zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈɛk.wɪ.ti/ | gerechtigheid |
| intellectual bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˌɪntəˈlɛkt͡ʃʊəl/ | verstandelijk |
| dose zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈdəʊ̯s/ | dosis |
| therapeutic bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˌθɛɹ.əˈpjuː.tɪk/ | therapeutisch |
| virus zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈvaɪ.ɹəs/ | virus |
Phrasal verbs die je zult horen
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| figure out werkwoord | uitvogelen, er achter komen | |
| come out werkwoord | /ˌkʌm ˈaʊt/ | uitkomen |
| go back werkwoord | teruggaan | |
| go down werkwoord | afdalen | |
| look forward to werkwoord | uitkijken naar, zich verheugen op | |
| pick up werkwoord | oppakken, optillen | |
| come back werkwoord | terugkomen | |
| come over werkwoord | langskomen |
Zinnen om te herhalen
Korte, volledige zinnen uit de video die je in alledaagse gesprekken kunt gebruiken:
- Can you make a medicine?
- Zax, what are you worried about?
- Can you get it to the bone marrow?
- Can you get lupin nanoparticles into immune cells?
- Can you get that into the brain?
Grammatica in deze video
De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:
| Structuur | In de video |
|---|---|
| Present perfect continuous have/has been + -ing — iets dat eerder begon en nog bezig is | have been working · he's been dreaming |
| “Used to” used to + werkwoord — een vroegere gewoonte of toestand die niet meer klopt | used to call · used to look |
| Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telt | it's been · has built · has become |
| Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet | being wrapped · were actually marked · is driven |
Uitspraak om op te letten
De spreker gebruikt 144 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals I'm, don't, we're. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.
- De “th”-klanken: therapeutic /ˌθɛɹ.əˈpjuː.tɪk/, theater /ˈθi(ə)tɚ/, ethics /ˈɛθ.ɪks/, theorist /ˈθiːəɹəst/, breadth /bɹɛdθ/
- De klanken “sh” en “zh”: innovation /ˌɪn.əˈveɪ.ʃən/, physician /fəˈzɪʃən/, fellowship /ˈfɛl.ə.ʃɪp/, explanation /ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən/, translation /tɹænzˈleɪʃən/
- Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: innovation /ˌɪn.əˈveɪ.ʃən/, ecosystem /ˈikoʊˌsɪstəm/, innovative /ˈɪn.əˌveɪtɪv/, curiosity /ˌkjʊɹ.iˈɑ.sə.ti/, intellectual /ˌɪntəˈlɛkt͡ʃʊəl/
Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:
- Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: innovative /ˈɪn.əˌveɪtɪv/, reward /ɹɪˈwɔɹd/, household /ˈhaʊshoʊld/, slide /ˈslaɪ̯d/, colleague /ˈkɒliːɡ/
- /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: vaccine /vækˈsin/, translate /tɹænzˈleɪt/, span /spæn/, translation /tɹænzˈleɪʃən/, mask /mæsk/
- /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: colleague /ˈkɒliːɡ/, investigator /ɪnˈvɛs.tɪˌɡeɪ̯.təː/, immigrant /ˈɪmɪɡɹənt/
Zo oefen je met deze video
- Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
- Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
- Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als vaccine, innovation, ecosystem.
Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?
Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.