Shadowing Practice: How To Read People Like Patrick Jane - Learn English Speaking with Video

Kies een oefenmodus

Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.

220 zinnen

Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.

Patrick Jane can look at someone for five seconds and tell that they're lying, having an affair, hiding something, or about to completely lose their s*.

And the weird part is, a lot of what he does isn't actually made up for the show.

Jane isn't psychic.

He's just ridiculously good at noticing what people accidentally reveal, and even better at tricking them into revealing more,

because half the time, he doesn't actually know the answer.

He says something, watches your reaction, lets you give him the missing information, and then somehow makes you feel like he knew it all along.

And once you understand his tricks, you start noticing just how much information people give away without realizing it.

So, I broke down the techniques Patrick Jane uses to read people, from figuring out when someone's lying,

to getting people to tell you things without ever asking them a question.

Cold reading.

The first trick

Jane uses is cold reading.

But instead of explaining it, let me do it to you first.

You're the kind of person who can be very social when you're comfortable.

But you also need time completely alone.

You've had people assume things about you that aren't actually true.

And there's probably something you've been thinking about changing in your life for a while now, but you haven't fully committed to it yet.

Sounds weirdly accurate, right?

Except I know absolutely nothing about you.

I gave you statements that sound personal while being broad enough to fit an insane number of people.

And your brain did the rest.

When I said people misunderstand you, you probably thought of a specific person.

When I said there's something you want to change, you decided what that thing was.

I never had to know.

You filled in the blanks for me.

And this is part of what makes Patrick Jane look almost psychic.

He doesn't always walk up to someone already knowing their entire life story.

Sometimes he'll throw out a statement that is specific enough to get a reaction, but flexible enough that he can adjust depending on what happens next.

And there's one thing that makes this work significantly better.

Certainty.

Imagine I look at you and say, you, uh, seem like maybe you've been having problems with someone close to you.

That sounds like I'm guessing.

But if I look directly at you and say, you've been having problems with someone close to you.

Now, your first thought probably isn't, How could she possibly know that?

It's who is she talking about?

Your brain starts searching your own life for evidence that makes my statement true.

And the second you react, even slightly, I have more information than I had five seconds ago, Jane can then narrow it down.

Someone you're romantically involved with.

They disappointed you recently.

And suddenly, it looks like he pulled an incredibly specific fact out of nowhere.

But he didn't start with this specific fact.

You let him there.

And there's another version of this that is honestly even more useful

because you can use it in completely normal conversations without pretending to be psychic.

It's called elicitation.

The basic idea is ridiculously simple.

If you want information from someone, sometimes don't ask them a question.

Say something slightly wrong instead, because people have an almost irresistible urge to correct you.

Let's say you want to know how much someone working at Walmart makes.

You could ask, how much do you make?

Now they know exactly what information you want.

Maybe that feels invasive, so they don't tell you.

Instead, you say, I heard

Walmart actually pays really well now, like $25 an hour.

And they go, what?

No, they don't.

I make $15.

You never asked.

Or imagine someone tells you they went out last night and you want to know who they were with.

Don't immediately ask, who did you go with?

Try, went with your friends?

And they might automatically respond, no, I went with my sister.

Again, they corrected you.

And people tend to love correcting things that are wrong.

But deliberately getting something wrong becomes a lot more interesting

when you think someone is lying

because Jane can insert a completely false detail into somebody's story just to see what they do with it.

Imagine someone tells you, I was near the mall around 8 last night.

You respond, oh, so you probably saw that huge car accident outside.

Apparently the road was completely blocked.

There was no accident.

You just made that up.

Now watch what happens.

Someone who genuinely remembers being there might look confused.

What accident?

I didn't see anything.

But someone who is actively constructing a story has another problem.

They don't know the accident is fake.

Oh yeah, actually, I think I did see something happening over there.

So you push a little further.

Yeah, apparently there were police everywhere.

And suddenly, yeah, that's probably what I saw.

They're now giving you memories of an event that never happened.

But Jane doesn't only listen to what people say.

Sometimes the most interesting part is what happens before they even answer.

And this is where people completely misunderstand body language.

You've probably heard things like they crossed their arms.

They're defensive.

They looked away.

They're lying.

No. Because what if they always cross their arms?

What if they hate eye contact?

One gesture tells you almost nothing.

What Jane pays attention to is change.

Let's say I suspect you stole something from me.

If I immediately walk up to you and say, did you steal my necklace?

I'm already watching nervous body language, but that doesn't tell me much.

You might just be nervous because some lunatic is accusing you of stealing a necklace.

So instead, I talk to you normally first.

100

How was your day?

101

Where have you been?

102

And while we're talking, I'm quietly learning what you look like when you're comfortable.

103

Maybe you naturally make a lot of eye contact.

104

Your hands move constantly when you talk.

105

You're leaning back.

106

Your voice is relaxed.

107

That's your baseline.

108

Then I casually mention, by the way, something weird happened.

109

My necklace disappeared yesterday.

110

And suddenly your hands stop moving.

111

You sit up.

112

Your answers become shorter.

113

And now I'm interested.

114

because I didn't decide that rubbing your hands means you're lying.

115

I noticed that you changed when I mentioned the necklace, and you want to look for more than one change.

116

This is where clusters come in.

117

Crossing your arms by itself could mean absolutely nothing.

118

But if the subject changes, and suddenly someone crosses their arms, starts self -soothing, their voice changes, and their previously expressive body becomes unusually still,

119

now you have something worth paying attention to, and don't fall for the biggest cliche of all.

120

Liars avoid eye contact.

121

Some people do the exact opposite.

122

If someone knows avoiding eye contact makes them look suspicious, they might stare directly at you because they're actively trying to look believable.

123

So don't ask, are they making eye contact?

124

Ask, is this how they were behaving 30 seconds ago?

125

That's the real trick.

126

But none of these tricks work particularly well if you're not actually paying attention.

127

And this is probably Patrick Jane's biggest advantage over everyone around him.

128

He notices everything.

129

Imagine Jane meets a man for the first time.

130

He looks at his hands and says, You recently stopped wearing your wedding ring.

131

The guy immediately looks confused.

132

How did you know that?

133

It sounds psychic.

134

Until you look at his hand, there's a pale strip of skin around his ring finger.

135

Where the rest of his hand has been exposed to the sun, that's it.

136

The information was sitting there the entire time.

137

Everyone could see it.

138

Jane was just the only person actually looking.

139

And once you start doing this, you realize people are basically walking around carrying evidence of their lives all over them.

140

Look at someone's hands.

141

Maybe there's dirt underneath their fingernails.

142

Maybe there are calluses in very specific places.

143

Look at their clothes, their shoes.

144

What's worn out?

145

What do they keep checking?

146

What do they immediately hide when somebody walks into the room?

147

None of these details necessarily mean anything on their own.

148

The interesting part is putting them together.

149

Imagine someone walks into a coffee shop wearing an expensive suit.

150

At first glance, you'd probably assume they have money.

151

But then you notice the suit doesn't fit particularly well.

152

Their shoes are much cheaper than everything else they're wearing.

153

The tag on their briefcase is still attached and they keep adjusting their watch like they're not used to wearing it, suddenly there's another possibility.

154

Maybe this isn't how they normally dress.

155

Maybe they're trying to impress someone, job interview, first date.

156

Now you don't know that yet, but you've noticed something worth investigating.

157

Jane notices a detail, creates a hypothesis, and then looks for something else that either supports it or destroys it.

158

And you can actually practice this.

159

The next time you're sitting somewhere public, pick one person and give yourself 30 seconds.

160

Just notice.

161

What can you know for certain?

162

What can you reasonably guess?

163

And most importantly, what are you assuming with absolutely no evidence?

164

Because those are three completely different things.

165

Another exercise is watching a reality show with the sound completely off.

166

Then turn the sound back on and see how catastrophically wrong you were.

167

And you probably will be wrong sometimes.

168

That's actually the useful part, because you're training yourself to separate.

169

I noticed this. From.

170

Therefore, this must mean that.

171

Jane is ridiculously good at the first part, and that's why he can make deductions from things everybody else walked straight past.

172

Because most of us think we're observing the world around us.

173

We're not.

174

We're filtering out almost all of it.

175

Your brain decides what seems important and throws everything else into the background.

176

But start deliberately looking at the things you normally ignore.

177

The hands, the shoes, the objects, the tiny changes in behavior.

178

And suddenly there's an entire layer of information that was always there.

179

You just weren't looking at it.

180

Play dumb.

181

And the last trick might be my favorite because it goes against what almost everyone naturally wants to do.

182

If you want to read people better, let them underestimate you.

183

Most people spend an insane amount of energy trying to prove that they're smart.

184

Jane does the opposite.

185

He acts on serious.

186

He asks questions he probably already knows the answer to.

187

Sometimes he deliberately lets someone believe they're smarter than him.

188

And that's useful because the moment somebody thinks they have you figured out, they stop worrying about whether you have them figured out.

189

Think about it.

190

If you knew you were sitting across from someone whose entire job was analyzing every word you said, you'd immediately become more careful.

191

You'd think before answering, you'd watch your expressions, you'd reveal less.

192

But if you think the person sitting across from you is slightly clueless, you relax.

193

Maybe you explain something you didn't need to explain.

194

Maybe you correct them.

195

Maybe you say something you would have filtered if you thought they were actually paying attention.

196

And suddenly, while you're busy thinking, God, this person is an idiot.

197

They're learning everything about you.

198

There's actually a perfect example of how powerful underestimation can be in the mentalist.

199

Tommy Volker pretended to have an intellectual disability, and because everyone had already placed him into the category of someone harmless,

200

someone who couldn't possibly be calculating what was happening around him, they stopped treating him like someone capable of deceiving them.

201

And that assumption helped hide the fact that he was the killer.

202

Obviously, I'm not suggesting you fake an intellectual disability to psychologically profile your friends, but the principle underneath it is useful.

203

People reveal more when they don't feel like they're being observed.

204

So sometimes, don't correct someone immediately.

205

Let them explain.

206

Ask the obvious question.

207

Let them think they know more than you.

208

And if someone completely misunderstands you, you don't always need to rush to prove them wrong.

209

Watch what they do when they believe their assumption is true.

210

Because sometimes being underestimated gives you something being impressive never will.

211

Information.

212

And when you put all of Jane's tricks together, you start realizing something.

213

Patrick Jane isn't actually reading minds.

214

He knows how to make people show him.

215

And that's probably the biggest thing you can actually learn from him.

216

Stop trying to magically decode every crossed arm, every look, every tiny movement.

217

Get curious.

218

Pay attention let people talk, and most importantly, stop focusing only on what people are deliberately trying to show you,

219

because people are constantly telling you who they are.

220

Most of the time, they're just assuming you aren't paying attention.

App downloaden

Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken

AI UitspraakScoor elke zin

IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid

WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op

WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt

Scan QR

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

FOR YOU

Aanbevolen Video

183 zinnen

How to Create a Character with Samuel L. Jackson | Discover MasterClass | MasterClass

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

167 zinnen

Every Real-Life Cheat Code Explained in 10 Minutes

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les

Deze spreekles is gebaseerd op de video “How To Read People Like Patrick Jane”. Deze video bevat 220 zinnen en 2145 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 10:44. De spreker praat snel, ongeveer 200 woorden per minuut, dus reken op verbonden en ingeslikte klanken. 87% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden, dus de woordenschat is goed te volgen.

Belangrijke woorden in deze video

15 woorden uit de video die het leren waard zijn, met uitspraak en betekenis:

Woord	Uitspraak	Betekenis
reveal werkwoord	/ɹɪˈviːl/	onthullen, zich ontpoppen
deliberately bijwoord	/dɪˈlɪb.(ə.)ɹət.li/	bewust, expres
necklace zelfstandig naamwoord	/ˈnɛkləs/	halssnoer, halsketting
steal werkwoord	/stiːl/	stelen, ontvreemden
shoe zelfstandig naamwoord	/ˈʃu/	schoen
ridiculously bijwoord	/ɹɪˈdɪk.jə.ləs.li/	belachelijk, bespottelijk
naturally bijwoord	/ˈnæt͡ʃ.(ə.)ɹə.li/	natuurlijk
confused bijvoeglijk naamwoord	/kənˈfjuːzd/	verward, in de war
insane bijvoeglijk naamwoord	/ɪnˈseɪn/	gestoord, waanzinnig
pretend werkwoord	/pɹəˈtɛnd/	voorgeven
intellectual bijvoeglijk naamwoord	/ˌɪntəˈlɛkt͡ʃʊəl/	verstandelijk
relax werkwoord	/ɹɪˈlæks/	losmaken
filter zelfstandig naamwoord	/ˈfɪltɚ/	filter
adjust werkwoord	/əˈd͡ʒʌst/	aanpassen, verstellen
assumption zelfstandig naamwoord	/əˈsʌm(p).ʃ(ə)n/	op zich nemen

Phrasal verbs die je zult horen

Woord	Betekenis
figure out werkwoord	uitvogelen, er achter komen
break down werkwoord	stukgaan, kapot gaan
give away werkwoord	weggeven
go out werkwoord	naar buiten gaan
wear out werkwoord	verslijten

Zinnen om te herhalen

Korte, volledige zinnen uit de video die je in alledaagse gesprekken kunt gebruiken:

You could ask, how much do you make?
Don't immediately ask, who did you go with?
Try, went with your friends?
How did you know that?
What can you know for certain?

Grammatica in deze video

De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:

Structuur	In de video
Present perfect continuous have/has been + -ing — iets dat eerder begon en nog bezig is	you've been thinking · you've been having
Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telt	You've had · You've probably heard · have you been
Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet	isn't actually made · has been exposed · is still attached
Betrekkelijke bijzinnen who / which + zin — extra informatie over een persoon of ding	person who can · Someone who genuinely · someone who is

Uitspraak om op te letten

De spreker gebruikt 74 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals they're, don't, you're. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.

De “th”-klanken: underneath /ˌʌndɚˈniθ/, hypothesis /haɪˈpɒθɪsɪs/, soothe /suːð/
De klanken “sh” en “zh”: shoe /ˈʃu/, assumption /əˈsʌm(p).ʃ(ə)n/, rush /ɹʌʃ/, suspicious /səˈspɪʃ.əs/, unusually /ʌnˈjuːʒuəli/
Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: deliberately /dɪˈlɪb.(ə.)ɹət.li/, ridiculously /ɹɪˈdɪk.jə.ləs.li/, naturally /ˈnæt͡ʃ.(ə.)ɹə.li/, intellectual /ˌɪntəˈlɛkt͡ʃʊəl/, disability /dɪsəˈbɪlɪti/

Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:

Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: confused /kənˈfjuːzd/, pretend /pɹəˈtɛnd/, observe /əbˈzɜːv/, impressive /ɪmˈpɹɛsɪv/, disappointed /ˌdɪsəˈpɔɪnɪd/
/æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: naturally /ˈnæt͡ʃ.(ə.)ɹə.li/, relax /ɹɪˈlæks/, actively /ˈæktɪvli/, narrow /ˈnæɹəʊ/, accidentally /ˌæk.sɪˈdɛnt(ə)li/
/g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: finger /ˈfɪŋɡɚ/, ignore /ɪɡˈnɔː/, investigate /ɪnˈvɛs.tə.ɡeɪt/, glance /ɡlæns/, fingernail /ˈfɪŋɡɚˌneɪl/

Zo oefen je met deze video

Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als reveal, deliberately, necklace.

Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?

Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.

Shadowing-techniek: lees de volledige stap-voor-stap-gids →

Shadowing Practice: How To Read People Like Patrick Jane - Learn English Speaking with Video

Kies een oefenmodus

App downloaden

Former FBI Agent Explains How to Read Body Language | Tradecraft | WIRED

Could Patrick Jane Prove Light Yagami Is Kira?

Ghosts | Someone Can See Hetty?! (S4, E16) | Paramount+

How to Become the Version of You Who Already Has It

Michael C. Hall On Playing A Psychopath | Friday Night With Jonathan Ross

Why Jane Hit On a Grieving WIDOW — The Mentalist Moment Fans STILL Argue About

How to explain complex ideas so people listen

Misdirection!

Translating Claude’s thoughts into language

How to Speed Read