Shadowing Practice: Why Prisoner Proven Innocent Can't Be Released - Learn English Speaking with Video
Creating lesson...
1
Picture this, you are 22 years old, in the prime of your life, with a pregnant and devoted wife you haven’t been married to for very long.
2
And then everything changes one night when a man is murdered in the street.
3
You are accused of the murder, with the evidence being that it was your face a witness saw running from the scene of the crime.
4
That evidence is weak to say the least, and seeing as you know very well you didn’t do it, you are confident you’ll get off.
5
But that’s not the case, and you will spend many years behind bars.
6
A trial judge will say you are likely innocent some twenty years after the crime was committed, and you still won’t get out.
7
How could this happen?
8
Let’s start from the beginning.
9
The man we are talking about is named Benjamine Spencer, and he was convicted along with another man of committing a murder on a quiet street in West Dallas over 30 years ago.
10
On March 22, in the year of 1987, a 33-year-old named Jeffrey Young who was doing well for himself at a clothing company was attacked after walking out of his company office around 9.30 pm.
11
The police report says he was then manhandled into his BMW by two men and drove over to West Dallas, and it’s there his body was dumped down a dark alley.
12
Police thought they had gotten lucky when witnesses came forward and said they saw what happened.
13
There were three of those witnesses, and they identified two men.
14
One was Spencer and the other was named Robert Mitchell.
15
But as the district attorney of Dallas now says, something might have been amiss because the witnesses all knew Spencer.
16
These people were not strangers.
17
Spencer was by no means an angel.
18
He’d spent some time behind bars before for driving on a suspended license and had also been put on probation for six years for driving a car that had been stolen by a friend.
19
Nonetheless, as we said, his new wife was pregnant and he was turning over a new leaf.
20
After he was picked up four days after the crime he wasn’t very worried.
21
It was just a mistake, a case of mistaken identity.
22
But that wasn’t the case at all.
23
Spencer had an alibi, too, which was the testimony of a young woman friend of his who said she had been hanging out with him when the murder and robbery took place.
24
On top of that, there was no physical evidence linking Spencer to the crime, just those witness testimonies.
25
During the robbery a watch had been stolen, as well as a wedding ring, a small portable TV, and a briefcase.
26
None of these things were found at Spencer’s house.
27
Police didn’t have any fingerprint evidence nor was there a murder weapon found.
28
Many years later Spencer would say in an interview, “I began to think, 'Well, I didn't commit this offence, the truth is going to come out.” But a few months down the line Spencer was sentenced to 35 years in prison, with the evidence being the witness’ testimony as well as a jailhouse informant’s testimony.
29
It was a nightmare come true, Spencer’s heart sank, his life was ruined.
30
The father-to-be had become a condemned man, and the state had failed to do its job in his eyes.
31
But not long into his sentence Spencer got a break.
32
It turned out that the star witness in his case had lied.
33
She had not told the truth about whether she had received a reward for coming forward and giving evidence.
34
A new trial was set, but Spencer was then offered a plea deal by the state.
35
He could probably get out in five years if he accepted this.
36
But wasn’t this 5 years too much?
37
And why would an innocent man taint his name by admitting he killed someone when he hadn’t?
38
In his mind he had been wronged, and accepting a plea deal was just another wrong in the topsy-turvy world of American justice.
39
Nonetheless, his attorney told him to take it.
40
Years alter Spencer would tell NPR, “He was saying, 'If you take it to trial, they're going to try to give you a life sentence, and they're likely to get it.
41
And I'm like, 'I'm not going to plead guilty to something I didn't do.” Who in their right mind would?
42
And so, he didn’t accept the deal.
43
During the second trial the state prosecuted Spencer for aggravated robbery and asked for a life sentence.
44
The evidence again was a witness testimony, with the star witness being a 42-year old woman who lived close to the alley where the victim was dumped.
45
It was her testimony that got Spencer convicted again, and as you’ll find out soon, her testimony was hardly concrete.
46
But she stood her ground, and according to reports, was very convincing when she described what she had seen on the night of the crime.
47
This was Spencer and Mitchell dumping the body.
48
Mitchell was also convicted again, and unfortunately he would not live much longer anyway.
49
So, now Spencer is back in prison again, looking down a long road of 30-something years living life behind bars as an innocent man.
50
His life now would be dedicated to proving his innocence, and this would be a long process.
51
Spencer got in touch with organizations that helped wrongly convicted men who were serving time.
52
One such organization was named Centurion Ministries, and the people there knew that the state has sent down an innocent man.
53
They built a case, interviewed over a hundred people, and then asked for a hearing.
54
This petition ended up on the desk of a criminal court judge in Dallas named Rick Magnis.
55
He said he wasn’t sure at first whether to have a hearing, mostly because the exoneration wasn’t based on any kind of new DNA evidence.
56
This is often what gets innocent people freed.
57
But he later said in interviews that the more he read about the case he realized there had been a lot of wrongs in Spencer’s conviction.
58
Twenty years after the crime Magnis granted an evidentiary hearing.
59
The witnesses came forward again, and this time two of them backed down.
60
But that woman who lived across from the alley didn’t, she stood firm again.
61
She said she had definitely seen Spencer.
62
As we said, there was a big problem with her testimony.
63
That’s because all those years later a forensic visual scientist was asked to watch a reenactment of the body being dumped.
64
What that was, was people in the dark pretending to be the pair that dumped the body.
65
After this, there was no doubt that this woman could have seen anything other than a silhouette.
66
No way could she have clearly seen a face as she said she had done.
67
That forensic scientist said with the conditions as they were, a person could not have made out a face any farther than 25 feet away.
68
But as it stood, the witness claiming to have seen the men who was standing closest to the crime scene was 93 feet away.
69
Again, just no way could have any of those witnesses got a clear ID.
70
With this new evidence Judge Magnis said ok enough is enough, and he ordered a retrial on the grounds of something called “actual innocence.” As for Spencer, he said he was over the moon when he heard the news.
71
Not only would he get out, but he would clear his name, too.
72
In an interview he said, “I was very hopeful.
73
I thought that this is it.
74
I'm going home.” That didn’t happen, though.
75
Spencer said at first he was hopeful that this retrial would take place within a few weeks.
76
They passed, so then he thought maybe a few months, and they passed.
77
In fact, years passed and the only authority capable of granting a new trial, the Court of Criminal Appeals, it seems did nothing at all.
78
Then in 2011.
79
Spence got some bad news.
80
There would be no retrial.
81
While a judge said that indeed if the new evidence had been presented at the first trial it would have been unlikely that Spencer would have been convicted.
82
But that same judge said because Spencer hadn’t come up with any incontrovertible new evidence proving he wasn’t there that night, such as CCTV footage or DNA that had never been tested, there would be no trial.
83
The judge admitted that Spencer was likely innocent, but it didn’t matter, he didn’t have the evidence to get that new trial.
84
His attorney now says she needs to start again; she needs to find this new evidence proving her client’s innocence.
85
The problem of course is how do you find new evidence 28 years after the fact.
86
The woman across from the alley now won’t talk openly about the case.
87
Another witness died and another now says he didn’t get a clear look at Spencer.
88
This witness now says he felt pressured by the police to say it was Spencer.
89
So, that’s it.
90
The only thing saying Spencer is guilty is the testimony of a witness who its been proved couldn’t have possibly seen Spencer that night.
91
Everyone seems to know the case stinks, but the fact is the justice system doesn’t seem to provide any solutions to get Spencer out.
92
But there is more.
93
There was another witness, but this witness was never called.
94
She now says that she is “1000 percent sure” that the people she saw didn’t include Spencer.
95
What about that jailhouse informant?
96
Well, he now says that Spencer never told him he had committed that crime.
97
Records also show something very fishy.
98
The informant said in court that he had not received any benefit from giving that statement.
99
But this guy was looking at a 25 year sentence for aggravated robbery.
100
Guess what happened after he spoke to police and gave his testimony?
101
He walked out of prison after just more than a year.
102
Another person has come forward saying he knows who killed the man that night because it was a friend of his who did it.
103
He admitted it to him.
104
This man did not come forward at the time because he didn’t want to rat on one of his friends.
105
The man whose name was put forward is currently serving time for robbery and assault.
106
Investigators now say that police weren’t going after Spencer, but they just had a case of what’s called “tunnel vision.” They had a theory, and they looked only at the evidence that fit that theory.
107
Anything else was ignored.
108
Spencer now sits in his cell, a man in 50s wearing glasses, waiting and hoping.
109
But he doesn’t have too much hope left.
110
In an interview he said, “I'm just at a point where, I'm still hopeful, but at the same time, it's like I'm stuck in a system.” His story has been written about extensively in the American media, but it seems this man really is stuck in the system.
111
He has been denied parole on each occasion he was up for it, and from what we can see still waits in his cell to this day, waiting in vain for something to help get him out of the web of American justice.
112
What do you think about this story?
113
Tell us in the comments.
114
Also, be sure to check out our other video Why Was This Prisoner Kept Locked Away In Permanent Total Isolation?
115
Thanks for watching, and as always, don’t forget to like, share and subscribe.
116
See you next time.
📺 Same Channel
B21
6'9" Brilliant Psychopath Who Hunted College Students (America's Most Evil Serial Killers)
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
Crazy Laws That Still Exist Around The World
University StudentsWorking Adults
B22
20% Speed of Light!! NEW Light Engine is INSANE!
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B21
These Crimes Will Send You To Death Row
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B21
Insane Assassinations That Changed the World
University StudentsWorking Adults
B24
Warren Buffett Is Selling NOW. The $397 Billion COLLAPSE.
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B21
The 7 Trillion AI Gamble Is Failing. Big Tech is TRAPPED Right NOW.
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C14
The Limitless AI Lie. The Bubble Is Slowly BURSTING.
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B21
50 Insane Facts About Vietnam War You Didn't Know
University StudentsWorking Adults
B21
15 Surprising Rules That Las Vegas Hotels Strictly Enforce
Travel EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B24
MH370's LAST Hunt. MYSTERY FINALLY SOLVED.
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B24
Innocent on Death Row, Here's What You Actually Get When You're Released
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B22
What Happens To Nuclear Waste?
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
Countries with the Worst Punishments Today
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B23
Maximum Security Prison Escape And Insane Crime Spree
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B23
Why Did Hitler Hate Jews
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
The Leaked Audit That Exposes OpenAI's Real Financial Crisis
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
Win $20,000 Dollars if You Survive this Haunted House
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
The Next Great Recession Isn't Housing... Its FAR Dumber.
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B22
Why Do You Have Pain Here When You Run
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
✨ Recommend Video
B23
85 sentences
Should the Age of Criminal Responsibility Be Raised? | Loose Women
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepHigh School Students
B22
160 sentences
UNCENSORED: should the West be suspicious of Islam? Jonathan Sacerdoti, at the Oxford Union
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B227 sentences
678
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
47 sentences
How to find hidden clues at crime scenes Theodore E Yeshion
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B22
95 sentences
James Spader’s Courtroom Masterclass | The Blacklist 4K
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B22
40 sentences
Powerful Closing Argument - For The People
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B213
25 sentences
Rishi Sunak: "I am disgusted" – Minister confronted over murderer's release
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C11
306 sentences
Comparing Prisons Around The World!
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B2233 sentences
The Unabomber | The True Story of Ted Kaczynski
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B23
58 sentences
1979 - ...And Justice for All.
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepCambridge Exam Prep
Vocabulary and speaking notes for this lesson
This B2 speaking lesson is built on the video “Why Prisoner Proven Innocent Can't Be Released”. The speaker keeps coming back to these words: Spencer, evidence, witness, testimony, trial. This video has 116 sentences and 1939 words to shadow. The speech runs for 9:04. The speaker talks fast, about 214 words per minute, so expect linked and reduced sounds. 84% of the words are among the 3,000 most common in English; the rest is worth studying before you start.
Key vocabulary in this video
The 15 most advanced words in the video, with pronunciation and meaning:
| Word | Pronunciation | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| testimony noun | /ˈtɛstɪmoʊni/ | Statements made by a witness in court. |
| convict verb | /ˈkɑnvɪkt/ | To find guilty, as a result of legal proceedings, or (informal) in a moral sense. |
| robbery noun | /ˈɹɑbəɹi/ | The act or practice of robbing. |
| dump verb | /dʌmp/ | To release, especially in large quantities and chaotic manner. |
| alley noun | /ˈæl.i/ | A narrow street or passageway, especially one through the middle of a block giving access to the rear of lots of buildings. |
| retrial noun | A second trial, by the original court, if the original trial was found to be improper, unfair, or no verdict was reached by a jury. | |
| hopeful adjective | /ˈhoʊpfl̩/ | feeling hope |
| innocence noun | /ˈɪnəsn̩s/ | Absence of responsibility for a crime, tort, etc. |
| aggravate verb | /ˈæɡ.ɹə.veɪ̯t/ | To make (an offence) worse or more severe; to increase in offensiveness or heinousness. |
| informant noun | /ɪnˈfɔɹmənt/ | One who relays confidential information to someone, especially to the police; an informer. |
| jailhouse noun | /ˈd͡ʒeɪlˌhaʊs/ | A building containing a prison. |
| forensic adjective | /fəˈɹɛn.zɪk/ | Relating to the use of science and technology in the investigation and establishment of facts or evidence in a court of law. |
| plea noun | /pliː/ | An appeal, petition, urgent prayer or entreaty. |
| nonetheless adverb | /ˌnʌnðəˈlɛs/ | Nevertheless. |
| briefcase noun | /ˈbɹiːfˌkeɪs/ | A case used for carrying documents, especially for business. |
Phrasal verbs you will hear
| Word | Pronunciation | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| come forward verb | To offer help or information, especially about a crime. | |
| get out verb | To leave or escape. | |
| back down verb | To take a less aggressive position in a conflict than one previously had, or has planned to have. | |
| check out verb | To record the departure or withdrawal of someone or something (such as guests, employees, books, etc.). | |
| come out verb | /ˌkʌm ˈaʊt/ | To be discovered; to be revealed. |
| come up with verb | To manage to produce, deliver, or present (something) by inventing, creating, thinking of, or obtaining it. | |
| find out verb | To discover, as by asking or investigating. | |
| get off verb | To move from being on top of (something) to not being on top of it. |
Grammar in this video
The structures the speaker uses most, with the exact words from the video:
| Structure | In the video |
|---|---|
| Passive voice be + past participle — the focus is on what happens, not who does it | is murdered · are accused · is named |
| Present perfect have/has + past participle — a past action that still matters now | haven't been · has sent · has come |
| Relative clauses who / which + clause — extra information about a person or thing | too, which was · woman who lived · men who were |
Pronunciation to watch
The speaker uses 39 contractions and reduced forms, such as didn't, I'm, wasn't. Say them the short way, as you hear them.
- The “sh” and “zh” sounds: evidentiary /ˌɛvɪˈdɛnʃiˌɛɹi/, probation /ˌpɹoʊˈbeɪʃən/, conviction /kənˈvɪkʃən/
- Long words — get the stress right: testimony /ˈtɛstɪmoʊni/, evidentiary /ˌɛvɪˈdɛnʃiˌɛɹi/, incontrovertible /ˌɪŋ.kɒn.tɹəˈvɜː.təbl̩/, investigator /ɪnˈvɛs.tɪˌɡeɪ̯.təː/, extensively /ɪkˈstɛn.sɪv.li/
How to practise with this video
- Listen to the whole video once without speaking and note the words you do not know.
- Start at 0.75× speed, shadow it sentence by sentence, then go back to normal speed once it feels easy.
- Record yourself and compare with the original, paying attention to words like testimony, convict, robbery.
What is the Shadowing Technique?
Shadowing is a science-backed language learning technique originally developed for professional interpreter training and popularized by polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. The method is simple but powerful: you listen to native English audio and immediately repeat it out loud — like a shadow following the speaker with just a 1–2 second delay. Unlike passive listening or grammar drills, shadowing forces your brain and mouth muscles to simultaneously process and reproduce real speech patterns. Research shows it significantly improves pronunciation accuracy, intonation, rhythm, connected speech, listening comprehension, and speaking fluency — making it one of the most effective methods for IELTS Speaking preparation and real-world English communication.