ฝึกพูดภาษาอังกฤษด้วยเทคนิค Shadowing จากวิดีโอ: So... What Was the Point of Artemis II?

Hi, welcome to another episode of ColdFusion.

⏸ หยุดชั่วคราว

ความเร็ว:

348 ประโยค

หากประโยคสั้นหรือยาวเกินไป กดที่ Edit เพื่อปรับแก้

Hi, welcome to another episode of ColdFusion.

This stunning picture of Earth was taken with a clarity that we've never seen before.

You can make out the aurora and even our atmosphere.

These photos were of course snapped by the crew of the Artemis 2 mission,

which recently returned to Earth after looping around the Moon.

This is another photo taken from the far side of the Moon,

about 400,000 kilometres or 250,000 miles away.

It is the furthest humans have ever travelled from Earth.

Most people just don't realise how far that is.

To put this distance into perspective,

this is the International Space Station.

It travels around the Earth in low orbit about 400 kilometres or 250 miles above Earth.

And this is how far the Moon is in comparison.

The International Space Station flies in low Earth orbit,

and the last time humans left low Earth orbit was all the way back in 1972.

That's all well and good,

But what was the point of the Artemis 2 mission?

Well, it wasn't just a dangerous sightseeing tour.

It's actually part of a long-term vision for the future of spaceflight.

The plan is to have regular moon landings every six months by 2028,

and eventually build a permanent base on the moon and Mars beyond that.

Funnily enough, Toyota has a part to play here,

and you'll love the name of their lunar rover.

So yes, these are all very lofty goals for sure,

but Artemis 2 was a crucial step to get there.

And in doing so, the mission carried a huge risk.

The four astronauts were travelling on a spacecraft that had never carried humans before.

Even during its test flight,

there was unexpected damage to the heat shield and the design was never fixed.

And the Inspector General actually says,

in our judgement, the unexpected behaviour of the heat shield poses a significant risk to the safety of future crewed missions.

Regardless, NASA and the crew still managed to carry out a grand human achievement by any measure.

In this episode, we'll see what the point of Artemis II was,

the mission's objectives, what's in store for the future,

and we'll also take a look at the messy way that this mission came to be.

Because rather than a well-thought-out mission to explore the stars,

it was more of a mission that was shoehorned into existence to create jobs at the behest of US Congress.

Despite its hurdles, I'm glad this mission existed.

As much as is going on in the world today,

missions like Artemis II are one of those rare moments

that get us to stop for a second

and collectively appreciate the core ingenuity of humanity and have a fresh appreciation of the planet we all live on.

Because regardless of how messy the road was to get here,

what this crew pulled off was extraordinary.

You are watching cold fusion TV.

Artemis II is the second out of four missions that NASA had planned.

Artemis I, the first mission,

was an unmanned version of the rocket and crew capsule.

Launched in 2022, its purpose was to test the systems before putting humans out into space.

We covered that story here.

And it's a good thing that they did test it first

because there was a problem with the heat shield on the crew capsule.

The very heat shield that protected the crew as they returned to Earth.

It suffered more damage than expected.

When Artemis 1 splashed down,

the mission was hailed as a great success.

But in reality, there were problems with the capsule.

During the 2022 Artemis I uncrewed test flight,

Orion's heat shield chipped and cracked when it re-entered the atmosphere.

So of course, NASA would fix it before putting humans on it, right?

Well, no. They left the design as is and sent the crew up anyway.

We'll come back to what happened here later.

Artemis II is made of two separate vehicles,

the SLS booster, which is the most powerful human-rated rocket ever made,

and the Orion spacecraft.

Each side booster is about the height of a 17-story building,

so yeah, they're pretty big.

No matter how many space launches you have seen,

you've never seen one like this because the space launch system is a vessel unto itself.

This is a beast.

Taller than the Statue of Liberty from the base to the tip of the torch,

well over 300 feet.

It weighs around six million pounds,

but that's okay because it can produce about eight million pounds of thrust.

So where are the astronauts in all of this?

They're up here.

That's where you'll find the Orion crew module.

One more thing, you'll see that upside down ice cream cone up there.

That is a escape module in a sense,

a way for the crew to get out.

Even when this rocket is going thousands of miles an hour,

it could bring them safely back down to earth.

Of course, everybody hopes that this doesn't get used,

that everything falls off as it should properly.

The names of the astronauts are Reid Wiseman,

Victor Glover, Christina Cook and Jeremy Hansen.

The crew didn't land on the moon,

but instead flew around it.

We'll talk about the mission objectives in a little bit.

But this trajectory made it the furthest humans have ever been from Earth,

beating the record set by the emergency swing around the moon carried out by the ill-fated Apollo 13 mission

that I previously covered.

The crew spent about 10 days in space in total.

The time to travel to the moon was about six days at a speed of 40,000 kilometers an hour.

When they reached the far side of the moon they spent six hours observing the lunar surface

and that includes parts of the far side that has has never been seen by humans in person before.

A touching moment occurred during those six hours when Commander Reed Wiseman requested

that a feature on the far side of the moon be named Carol after his late wife,

who he sadly lost in 2020.

100

I feel this is a good time to send this down.

101

And especially meaningful for this crew is a number of years ago,

102

we started this journey in our close-knit astronaut family,

103

and we lost a loved one.

104

And there's a feature in a really neat place on the moon,

105

and it is on the near side, far side boundary.

106

In fact, it's just on the near side of that boundary.

107

And so at certain times of the moon's transit around Earth,

108

you can, we will be able to see this from Earth.

109

And so we lost a loved one.

110

Her name was Carol.

111

The spouse of Reed, the mother of Katie and Ellie.

112

And we would like to call her Carol.

113

As the crew looped around the moon,

114

they used its gravity to pull them back towards Earth.

115

And once this was done,

116

the gravity from Earth could take over.

117

The re-entry was no normal return though.

118

Because they'd travelled so far,

119

the return velocity was immense,

120

way more than a normal space mission.

121

They entered the atmosphere at Mark 32,

122

which is 32 times the speed of sound,

123

40,000 kilometres an hour, or 11 kilometres per second.

124

The crew had travelled so rapidly that over the 10 days,

125

everyone on Earth had aged 10 to 50 microseconds more than the astronauts in the time they were away,

126

and that's due to time dilation.

127

As the Orion spacecraft entered the atmosphere,

128

the air molecules hitting the surface of the spacecraft became

129

so compressed with so much friction

130

that it formed a bubble of hot plasma reaching about 2,800 degrees Celsius for minutes at a time.

131

To give you an idea,

132

just take a look at how intense atmospheric re-entry looks like.

133

This footage is from a Soyuz re-entry,

134

and they're traveling about 50% slower than the Artemis mission.

135

After breaching the atmosphere, the crew parachuted back to Earth and touched down on the Pacific Ocean.

136

And with that, the journey of 1.1 million kilometres,

137

or 700,000 miles, was over.

138

Houston, Tagerty, Splashdown, sending post-landing command now.

139

Splashdown confirmed.

140

The crew of Artemis II safely home after travelling further from it than anyone who's ever lived.

141

Though they'd tested, trained and planned for each step of the mission,

142

this day was the most dangerous.

143

Re-entry of a new spacecraft with a heat shield

144

that nearly failed in a previous test flight and had never carried humans before.

145

Okay, so what was the actual point of the mission?

146

Well, it wasn't just a risky sightseeing tour.

147

There was actual work and experiments to be done.

148

But before that, let's hear a word from today's sponsor, Raycon.

149

With Mother's Day coming up,

150

I've been thinking about gifts to give my mum that are actually useful day to day.

151

And one that stood out to me is Raycon's Bone Conduction Headphones.

152

They're designed a bit differently from regular headphones.

153

Instead of sitting in your ears,

154

they just rest on the outside and use bone conduction to transmit sound,

155

which means you can listen to music or podcasts while still hearing everything around you.

156

And that's what I like most about them.

157

Whether I'm out for a walk,

158

running errands, or just going about my day,

159

I can stay aware of what's happening,

160

traffic, people, everything, without completely tuning out.

161

They're built for that kind of everyday use too.

162

You get around 13 hours of battery life,

163

they're waterproof and dustproof, and because there's no in-ear fit,

164

they're comfortable to wear for long periods without really noticing them.

165

I've been using them pretty regularly,

166

and they've just become one of those things that easily fits into my routine.

167

Raycon is known for delivering solid audio quality without the premium price tag,

168

and with over 3 million customers and a 30-day happiness guarantee,

169

there's a reason they've built that reputation.

170

So if you're looking for something practical this Mother's Day,

171

or even just something for yourself,

172

this is a good option.

173

Go to buyraycon.com slash coldfusionbc to get 15% off bone conduction headphones.

174

That's buyraycon.com slash coldfusionbc.

175

The link is in the description.

176

Thanks to Raycon for supporting cold fusion.

177

Now, back to the story.

178

Let's take a look at those mission objectives.

179

There were a few objectives for this specific mission,

180

but the main ones were as follows.

181

Number one, study the moon's surface and photograph its features.

182

The crew even had training from geologists to know what to look for.

183

Number two, test the human body in space.

184

The testing included the effects of zero gravity and radiation on a mission so remote.

185

Comparing information gathered from astronauts before,

186

during and after space flight provides a window into what happens to the human body in space.

187

But Artemis II will be the first to provide these measurements in deep space.

188

In order to do the biological testing,

189

there were small human cell chips with integrated circuits to mimic tissue function.

190

For the experiment, they used the astronauts' bone marrow.

191

They'll compare the effect of cosmic radiation on these cells versus a control.

192

Lots of experiments conducted.

193

One of them is really fascinating,

194

and it includes computer chips that contain the astronauts' bone marrow.

195

And there is hope

196

that evidence collected from this particular experiment could reshape the practice of medicine here on Earth

197

and tell us more about what it would be like to live for a long period of time in deep space.

198

The astronauts also tested a new kind of lithium-ion battery and also a radiation shelter,

199

which is used in cases of emergency like a solar flare.

200

And number three, testing maneuverability.

201

While near Earth, crew member,

202

Victor Glover, carried out a simulated docking maneuver to see how well the craft performed for future missions.

203

We're going to see what the plan is for future missions near the end of the episode,

204

but for now, let's come back to that damaged heat shield.

205

CBA reports what happened during the testing phase.

206

Quote, During the Artemis I mission in 2022,

207

the first test flight of the Orion capsule had no humans on board.

208

Engineers were shocked to see large cracks

209

and chunks missing from the protective heat shield that lines the bottom of the capsule, end quote.

210

Basically, the heat shield is actually designed to burn away slightly to take away some of that thermal energy.

211

NASA used the same material during the Apollo missions,

212

so they opted to use it again.

213

But on testing the Artemis I,

214

it was coming in so fast that the heat shield sustained unexpected damage.

215

There were unpredicted cracks and way too much of the surface was missing.

216

In fact, entire chunks were gone.

217

Over 100 locations were affected.

218

The material's ablative, so it sort of burns away slowly and you expect that,

219

but you didn't expect chunks of it to fall away.

220

There was a subsequent investigation to find out what happened.

221

The suspected cause was from hot gas bubbles being trapped in the heat shield material.

222

The pressure from the bubbles eventually damaged the heat shield.

223

Remember, these guys are travelling at 11km per second,

224

facing temperatures of almost 3000 degrees Celsius,

225

or half the surface temperature of the sun.

226

So why were the bubbles forming?

227

It was later discovered

228

that it may have been caused from the way NASA decided to enter the atmosphere during the Artemis 1 test flight.

229

The plan was to enter the atmosphere twice,

230

once just skimming it to slow the craft down,

231

and the second at a steeper angle to actually enter and land.

232

The bubbles formed through the skimming stage,

233

then heated and exploded during the final re-entry.

234

For Artemis II, NASA decided to go with a single re-entry approach.

235

After intense testing, including breaking off even more of the heat shield to see what happened,

236

they were convinced that the heat shield would perform as designed with the new approach.

237

Some former NASA personnel say the trajectory changes may not be enough,

238

while other engineers and NASA leaders say the analysis,

239

testing, and adjustments do mitigate the risk.

240

NASA also decided that since there was a new shield coming for the Artemis 3 mission,

241

the delays and extra cost wouldn't be worth it in the long term.

242

And Artemis 2 will use the same heat shield design as Artemis 1.

243

So as the Orion crew was barreling towards Earth,

244

there was a slight air of worry among some of the public that was paying attention.

245

Some former astronauts have concerns over safety for this mission.

246

Fortunately, all did go well in the end,

247

so a sigh of relief could be felt.

248

Looking at it from a historical stance,

249

Artemis 2 is significant, although it manages to be despite its beginnings and not because of them.

250

The SLS rocket, the one that launched Artemis 2,

251

is officially called the Space Launch System,

252

but some people jokingly call it the Senate Launch System.

253

And that's because it wasn't built to meet NASA's needs,

254

but it was built to meet Congress's needs.

255

Frankly, a big part of the motivation was because it would make a good jobs program.

256

The publication, The Conversation, has a great piece written by space historian Emily A.

257

Margolis.

258

Basically, the story goes like this.

259

In 2004, President George W.

260

Bush pitched a new vision for space exploration centred around a spacecraft called the Crew Exploration Vehicle.

261

It's to develop and test a new spacecraft, the Crew Exploration Vehicle.

262

He wanted to see it fly by 2008,

263

human missions by 2014, and astronauts on the moon by 2020.

264

By 2008, and to conduct the first manned mission no later than 2014.

265

George Bush's vision would become the Constellation program.

266

But in 2008, the economy imploded.

267

I detailed exactly why in this episode.

268

But the fact of the matter was that there was no money for NASA.

269

It's time to save what we can,

270

spend what we must, and live within our means once again.

271

For NASA, that means scrapping a $100 billion program proposed by the previous administration of President George W.

272

Bush.

273

Especially since the first prototype rocket of the Constellation program,

274

called Ares-1, was already $3.1 billion over budget.

275

The program was axed, but Congress wasn't happy about that.

276

As it turns out, NASA provides work for aerospace contractors,

277

which preserve jobs in numerous congressional districts.

278

There was a vested interest in increasing NASA's budget,

279

so Congress demanded that NASA find something that could be shoehorned into a shuttle.

280

Now building a space shuttle because you want to create jobs is fine,

281

but that meant that the incentives weren't in the right place from a mission point of view.

282

And because of that, Congress's rocket was vague.

283

It didn't matter what it did,

284

it just needed to be able to carry stuff into space.

285

There was no clear reasoning for it.

286

There wasn't even any specifications of what had to be built.

287

The result was the SLS.

288

In 2017, NASA was directed by the government to do a moon landing,

289

but they couldn't build a moon lander with just 0.47% of the federal budget.

290

So, they had to sift through what they already had.

291

The Orion capsule was chosen,

292

even though it was built back in 2012.

293

Now, Orion couldn't land on the moon,

294

but it could fly around it,

295

so that was good enough.

296

So there you go.

297

Both the SLS and Orion capsule were picked without a clear goal.

298

Their missions ended up being retroactively figured out based on what they could do.

299

And to add to all of this,

300

there's some concerns about NASA's ambitious goals and internal operations.

301

Susan Helms of the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel has said

302

that NASA is stacking too many simultaneous innovations on top of each other.

303

She called Artemis 3 high risk.

304

The recommendation was for NASA to re-evaluate its mission objectives for the future.

305

Speaking of which, let's see what could be in store for future missions.

306

So now, with Artemis 2 done, what's next?

307

Artemis 3 in 2027 is planned as a low-Earth orbit docking test rather than landing on the Moon itself.

308

It will test docking with a commercial lunar lander,

309

currently being developed by either SpaceX or Blue Origin.

310

Both firms are currently battling to see which company wins the contract.

311

Then, in 2028 with Artemis IV,

312

NASA plans to finally land on the moon again,

313

kicking off regular moon landings every 6 to 12 months.

314

Now that sounds wild, but NASA had a similar frequency of moon landings in the late 60s and early 70s era.

315

Later in 2028 for Artemis V,

316

the early stages of building a permanent moon base will begin.

317

Beyond this, NASA plans to develop lunar infrastructure,

318

including Lunar communications satellites, rovers like the lunar terrain vehicle,

319

the Viper, which will explore for resources,

320

and a Japanese rover built by Toyota and the Japanese Aerospace Space Exploration,

321

which will be used for missions up to 45 days.

322

The name of the rover is unironically called the Toyota Lunar Cruiser.

323

I just love that.

324

Other goals include solar and nuclear power.

325

So I have to be honest,

326

the goals are so lofty that this is one of those I'll see it when I believe it situations.

327

But the new head of NASA,

328

Jared Isaacman, has shaken things up at the government organisation,

329

so we'll have to watch this space to see if the historic organisation can turn a corner.

330

So in conclusion, although Artemis II was just a stepping stone into a space exploration future,

331

it was still very cool to witness,

332

especially for a mission created out of cancelled space projects.

333

So there you go, that is the whole story of the Artemis II mission,

334

and even though it was messy, it still is inspiring.

335

with wars, rogue tech overlords,

336

economic issues and social division running rampant,

337

missions like Artemis 2 is something to be encouraged by.

338

We humans are still capable of a lot when we put our minds to something positive.

339

Even if you don't care about that,

340

we now have some of the most beautiful imagery ever seen for our history books.

341

And you can't be mad at that.

342

Anyway, that's about it from me.

343

Thanks for watching.

344

My name is Dagogo and you've been watching ColdFusion and I'll catch you again soon for the next episode.

345

Cheers guys.

346

Have a good one.

347

Cold fusion.

348

It's new thinking.

TRENDING

ยอดนิยม

เทคนิค Shadowing คืออะไร?

Shadowing เป็นเทคนิคการเรียนรู้ภาษาที่ได้รับการรับรองทางวิทยาศาสตร์ พัฒนาขึ้นสำหรับการฝึกนักแปลมืออาชีพ วิธีการนี้เรียบง่ายแต่ทรงพลัง: คุณฟังเสียงภาษาอังกฤษจากเจ้าของภาษาและพูดตามทันที — เหมือนเงาที่ตามผู้พูดด้วยช่วงเวลาห่าง 1-2 วินาที การวิจัยแสดงว่าเทคนิคนี้ปรับปรุงความแม่นยำในการออกเสียง ทำนองเสียง จังหวะ การเชื่อมเสียง การฟังเข้าใจ และความคล่องแคล่วในการพูดได้อย่างมีนัยสำคัญ

☕ เลี้ยงกาแฟเราสักแก้ว

ShadowingEnglish ยังคงเปิดให้ใช้งาน ฟรี 100% ได้ด้วยการสนับสนุนจากคุณ ค่าใช้จ่ายสำหรับเซิร์ฟเวอร์และ AI นั้นสูงมาก — กาแฟของคุณช่วยให้เราเดินหน้าต่อไปได้! 🙏

บริจาคผ่าน PayPal

ShadowingEnglish.com – ฝึกพูดภาษาอังกฤษแบบ Shadowing

ฝึกพูดภาษาอังกฤษด้วยเทคนิค Shadowing จากวิดีโอ: So... What Was the Point of Artemis II?

ยอดนิยม

เกี่ยวกับบทเรียนนี้

คำศัพท์และวลีสำคัญ

เคล็ดลับในการฝึกพูด

เทคนิค Shadowing คืออะไร?

ฝึกพูดภาษาอังกฤษด้วยเทคนิค Shadowing จากวิดีโอ: So... What Was the Point of Artemis II?

ดาวน์โหลดแอป

เกี่ยวกับบทเรียนนี้

คำศัพท์และวลีสำคัญ

เคล็ดลับในการฝึกพูด

เทคนิค Shadowing คืออะไร?