Shadowing-Übung: Why you should "steel man" other people - Englisch Sprechen Lernen mit Video
Übungsmodus wählen
Jeder Modus öffnet einen Übungsraum im Vollbild.
73 Sätze
Wenn Sätze zu kurz oder zu lang sind, klicke auf Edit, um sie anzupassen.
1
A straw man is when you simplify or exaggerate somebody's position to make it an easier target.
2
It's a target that you can then bat down with adversarial ease.
3
For example, if an atheist says that Christianity is just worshipping some bearded man in the sky, that is a straw man,
4
because I've yet to meet a Christian who would accept that as a representation of their religion.
5
Of course, if a Christian then says
6
that an atheist is somebody who does not believe in anything at all
7
or that life has no meaning or that we can just do anything that is also quite likely a straw man.
8
The problem with a straw man argument is
9
that not only does it not address somebody's actual points but it poisons the entire debate.
10
It's a kind of bad faith argument that sees conversations as a brawl
11
and that truth is just one weapon in the arsenal in a war to win at all costs.
12
But there is a better way.
13
The opposite of a straw man is a steel man.
14
This is where you not only try to represent somebody's position as faithfully as you can and with respect, but you do so in the best possible light.
15
You spend a great deal of attention double-checking that what you think somebody's position is, is what that person is actually trying to argue.
16
A great example of this in action, I think, is Alex O'Connor.
17
I've yet to see a video of his where he willfully
18
misrepresent an argument just to make it an easier position to attack.
19
In fact, he'll often spend a great deal of time trying to reach a mutual understanding of the position
20
and only then will he criticise it and only then will he do so politely.
21
In my experience, if you take the time to actually inquire about what somebody actually believes, you'll find a far greater nuance and often far greater agreement than you might have thought at the start.
22
For example, only the most dastardly and venal of politicians are actually doing it for themselves.
23
I think that most politicians want to make society and the world at least a bit better.
24
It's just that the right and the left-wing arguments about how to do that will differ.
25
It's long been pointed out that calling your political opponents the enemy
26
or evil or idiotic without saying what that means is not only childish, but it's bad for philosophy, it's bad for democracy, and it's bad for politics.
27
In his 2013 book, Intuition, Pumps, and Other Tools, the philosopher Daniel Dennett laid out four rules, one of which sounds remarkably like a steel man.
28
These are rules for a good debate, and this is what they are.
29
First and most important is that you should attempt to express your target's position so clearly, vividly, and fairly that your target says things like,
30
well, I wish I had put it like that as well.
31
For example, if somebody says to you that social media is inherently evil, you can say to them, well, do you mean that there is some content that is addictive
32
and dangerous and that young people especially shouldn't be expected to resist that addiction as much as adults?
33
Second, you should list all of the ways that you and your opponent agree on things.
34
You might say that, yes, okay, we both agree that there are aspects of social media that are dangerous, that we should have greater regulation and that the conversation should focus mostly on young people.
35
Third, you might recognize the ways in which your partner has taught you something new.
36
For example, you might say, oh, I didn't know that people today are on average on social media two hours a day.
37
Fourth and finally, only then after all of this can you go on to then try and criticize or reject that position.
38
You might say, I don't actually think that we should ban all social media.
39
In Plato's dialogues, you'll often see Socrates lining up his opponents with a steel man argument.
40
A huge part of the dialogue involves Socrates clarifying, laying out and even strengthening the other person's position.
41
For example, in the Gorgias, Socrates pauses and reframes Callicles' position about strength and domination, often making it sound more coherent than Callicles himself.
42
In Republic, when his opponent argues that justice is nothing more than the interests of the strongest, Socrates doesn't caricature it or simplify the idea.
43
Instead, he builds it up into the best version of itself, before then showing why it might be wrong.
44
Debates today are often about trying to grab the six o'clock headlines or ride the viral wave with an entertaining gotcha moment.
45
But the Socratic method was about understanding fully before disagreeing deeply because that's the spirit of the steel man.
46
Of course, Plato's dialogues are not podcast transcripts.
47
They are fictionalised accounts of Plato's version of Socrates debating Plato's version of his opponents.
48
But the fact that Plato was so willing to present rival opinions in such a strong and positive light, before then pulling them apart,
49
reveals just how far we have drifted in what we call a good discussion.
50
And in fact, this is why Plato was so suspicious about debates.
51
He called debates stupid and dangerous.
52
Because according to Plato, debates are very rarely about truth or philosophy.
53
They are about ego and pride and winning at all costs.
54
Plato often criticises the sophists who, amongst other things, were professional debaters and they would teach other members of the public how they could win at debates.
55
They taught people certain tricks and tactics to speak well, how to argue well and how to make the opponent look a bit silly.
56
Plato hated these kind of debates
57
because it reduced philosophy to a competition where both parties would try to outwit
58
and outspeak each other in a kind of game.
59
The Greeks called it heuristic and the heuristic debater would appeal to the audience.
60
They would mock their opponents.
61
They would resort to any fallacious argument they could so long as it meant they could win.
62
Plato thought that these debates were not just some harmless fun
63
because the big problem with heuristic is that those who are watching the debate confuse the winner with the truth.
64
But just because somebody has won a debate through wit and professional tactics doesn't necessarily mean that they are right.
65
For Plato, truth and philosophy is a much longer collaborative and dialectic process.
66
In many ways, the problem of strawmanning and ridiculing invented beliefs will not go away.
67
Point scoring and cheering to the crowd were present in ancient Greece
68
and they are here in modern primetime TV debates as well.
69
But the steel man is something
70
that we can try to bring back into everyday conversations with the people we interact with weekly.
71
Because what Plato and Dennett both knew is that if you are to actually grow in your beliefs, you have to see debate as a constructive act and with good intentions.
72
Debates are not adversarial opportunities to make your opponent look like an idiot.
73
They are opportunities to become better and to grow.
App herunterladen
Alles, was du zum fließenden Sprechen brauchst
KI-AussprachebewertungJeder Satz bewertet
IPA-TrainingJeden Laut meistern
WortschatzBaue deinen Wortschatz auf
VokabelspielSpielend lernen
Gleicher Kanal
C1118
Arguments for God: The Fine Tuning Argument
British AccentDaily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C152
Shakespeare: Hamlet
British AccentDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C17
The “Nietzsche Thesis”: Why we don’t really care about truth
British AccentIELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C15
The day you died (and didn't notice)
British AccentDaily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C110
Some brains are built for philosophy. Is yours?
British AccentDaily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C120
Why you can't quit social media (and the Romans knew it)
British AccentDaily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B26
One of the cruellest things to tell any child
British AccentTeensDaily ConversationHigh School Students
C17
Every monster you fear is really you
British AccentDaily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B25
The 4 moments that will change your life
British AccentDaily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C15
3 philosophy classics that are better than self-help books
British AccentDaily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C110
“But you did it first!”: A defense of the whataboutism
British AccentIELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
FOR YOU
Empfohlenes Video
C18
39 Sätze
Why We Should Refuse to Get Into Arguments
British AccentBusiness EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C110
50 Sätze
What Do I Project onto Other People?
British AccentDaily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C1180
24 Sätze
The uncomfortable truth | Yuval Noah Harari
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B23
268 Sätze
3 Things That Feel Like Progress But Aren't
British AccentBusiness EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C11
654 Sätze
Stuart & Cliffe Knechtle | Do Agnostics Just Want To Have Control? | Give Me an Answer
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
260 Sätze
【TED】優れたリーダーはどうやって行動を促すか/サイモン・シネック （日本語字幕）
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B2155 Sätze
Why You Should Talk To Strangers | Kio Stark | English Subtitles
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
21 Sätze
How to debate a stupid person | Jonny Thomson
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C11
259 Sätze
Talk Back: Why Arguing With Yourself Can Help You Flourish
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
814 Sätze
What It Means To Be A Good Man Today With Tom Junod
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
Wortschatz und Sprechhinweise zu dieser Lektion
Dieses Video enthält 73 Sätze und 1211 Wörter zum Nachsprechen. Der gesprochene Teil dauert 6:27. Der Sprecher spricht schnell, etwa 188 Wörter pro Minute – rechne mit verbundenen und verkürzten Lauten. 82 % der Wörter gehören zu den 3.000 häufigsten im Englischen; den Rest solltest du dir vor dem Üben ansehen.
Wichtiger Wortschatz in diesem Video
15 lernenswerte Wörter aus dem Video, mit Aussprache und Bedeutung:
| Wort | Aussprache | Bedeutung |
|---|---|---|
| opponent Substantiv | /əˈpəʊ.nənt/ | Gegner, Gegnerin |
| straw Substantiv | /stɹɔ/ | Halm, Strohhalm |
| argue Verb | /ˈɑɹ.ɡju/ | diskutieren, erörtern |
| dialogue Substantiv | /ˈdaɪəˌlɑɡ/ | Dialog, Gespräch |
| belief Substantiv | /bɪˈliːf/ | Glauben |
| tactics Substantiv | /ˈtæktɪks/ | Taktik |
| politician Substantiv | /ˌpɑ.ləˈtɪʃ.ən/ | Politiker, Politikerin |
| criticize Verb | /ˈkɹɪtɪsaɪz/ | kritisieren, Kritik üben |
| atheist Substantiv | /ˈeɪ.θi.ɪst/ | Atheist, Atheistin |
| necessarily Adverb | /ˌnɛs.əˈsɛɹ.ə.li/ | notwendigerweise, nötig |
| trick Substantiv | /ˈtɹɪk/ | List, Falle |
| everyday Adjektiv | /ˈɛvɹiˌdeɪ/ | Alltags-, alltäglich |
| deeply Adverb | /ˈdi(ː)pli/ | tief |
| reveal Verb | /ɹɪˈviːl/ | enthüllen |
| rarely Adverb | /ˈɹɛəɹli/ | selten |
Phrasal Verbs, die du hören wirst
| Wort | Aussprache | Bedeutung |
|---|---|---|
| lay out Verb | /ˌleɪ ˈaʊt/ | ausgeben |
| go away Verb | weggehen, fortgehen | |
| point out Verb | hinweisen |
Aussprache, auf die du achten solltest
Der Sprecher verwendet 10 Kurzformen und abgeschwächte Formen, zum Beispiel doesn't, I've, you'll. Sprich sie in der kurzen Form, so wie du sie hörst.
- Die „th“-Laute: atheist /ˈeɪ.θi.ɪst/, strengthen /ˈstɹɛŋ(k)θən/, faithfully /ˈfeɪθfəli/
- Die Laute „sh“ und „zh“: politician /ˌpɑ.ləˈtɪʃ.ən/, regulation /ˌɹɛɡjʊˈleɪʃən/, representation /ˌɹɛp.ɹə.zɛnˈteɪ.ʃən/, worship /ˈwɝ.ʃɪp/, addiction /əˈdɪkˌʃən/
- Lange Wörter – auf die Betonung achten: politician /ˌpɑ.ləˈtɪʃ.ən/, necessarily /ˌnɛs.əˈsɛɹ.ə.li/, regulation /ˌɹɛɡjʊˈleɪʃən/, representation /ˌɹɛp.ɹə.zɛnˈteɪ.ʃən/, collaborative /kəˈlæb.ə.ɹə.tɪv/
So übst du mit diesem Video
- Höre dir das ganze Video einmal an, ohne zu sprechen, und notiere die Wörter, die du nicht kennst.
- Beginne mit 0,75-facher Geschwindigkeit, sprich Satz für Satz nach und wechsle zur normalen Geschwindigkeit, sobald es leichtfällt.
- Nimm dich auf und vergleiche mit dem Original; achte dabei auf Wörter wie opponent, straw, argue.
Grammatik in diesem Video
Die Strukturen, die der Sprecher am häufigsten verwendet, mit den genauen Worten aus dem Video:
| Struktur | Im Video |
|---|---|
| Present Perfect have/has + Partizip Perfekt – eine vergangene Handlung, die jetzt noch wichtig ist | has taught · have drifted · has won |
| Passiv be + Partizip Perfekt – wichtig ist, was geschieht, nicht wer es tut | been pointed · be expected · are fictionalised |
| Relativsätze who / which + Satz – eine Zusatzinformation über eine Person oder Sache | somebody who does · those who are |
Was ist die Shadowing-Technik?
Shadowing ist eine wissenschaftlich fundierte Sprachlerntechnik, die ursprünglich für die professionelle Dolmetscherausbildung entwickelt und durch den Polyglotten Dr. Alexander Arguelles populär gemacht wurde. Die Methode ist einfach aber wirkungsvoll: Du hörst englisches Audio von Muttersprachlern und wiederholst es sofort laut — wie ein Schatten, der dem Sprecher mit nur 1–2 Sekunden Verzögerung folgt. Anders als passives Hören oder Grammatikübungen zwingt Shadowing dein Gehirn und deine Mundmuskulatur, gleichzeitig echte Sprachmuster zu verarbeiten und zu reproduzieren. Studien zeigen, dass es Aussprachegenauigkeit, Intonation, Rhythmus, verbundene Sprache, Hörverständnis und Sprechflüssigkeit signifikant verbessert — was es zu einer der effektivsten Methoden für die IELTS Speaking-Vorbereitung und reale englische Kommunikation macht.