シャドーイング練習: Lady Hale: Do We Have The Right To Die? - 動画で英語スピーキングを学ぶ

練習モードを選ぶ

各モードは全画面の練習ルームで開きます。

49 文

文が短すぎたり長すぎる場合は、Editをタップして調整してください。

Do we have the right to die?

And of course, it does all depend what you mean by a right.

I am a lawyer, so I would distinguish between two different sorts of right.

A negative right, which is the freedom to do something without being interfered with, either by the state or by other people.

And a positive right, which is the right to be provided with something by other people.

Now, We already have.

the negative right to die because we are free to refuse life -sustaining treatment.

including fairly aggressive life sustaining like the machine you were just talking about.

We have the right to refuse food and drink.

We have the right to refuse drugs that will cure Uh, terminal disease that we have.

So we already have that freedom.

We have the right to take even more active steps to kill ourselves because suicide is no longer a crime.

So the question really is, Are we also free to seek the assistance of somebody else to help us die.

when we can't do it ourselves or we don't fancy any of those options.

And The case that we had in the Supreme Court that asked that question very forcibly was a case concerning three people,

but one of whom was Paul Nicklinson.

All three of these people had suffered catastrophic injuries.

and were now very, very seriously disabled.

Unable basically to move other than to blink an eye or sometimes to move their head, occasionally just to move an arm a little bit,

but they were very seriously disabled.

They had been so for some years and had reached the conclusion that they did not want to go on.

but there were none of them dependent on a ventilator.

Had they been dependent on a ventilator, they could have said, "Turn it off." But they couldn't do that,

so their current choices were to refuse food, drink, essential medication.

So, I think that's a good question.

And all of them really wanted somebody to help them to die.

And we in the Supreme Court were asked to make a declaration as to whether

that was incompatible with their human rights and the European Court of human rights in Strasbourg,

has said that there is a human right to decide the place and manner of one's own.

Passing.

And so two of us in the Supreme Court, there were nine of us, Two of us took the view that denying people that right was,

obviously not always, but in the circumstances of those people, incompatible with their human rights.

Three of the other justices said, "Well, yes, we might do that, but not now, not yet." You know,

because Parliament is thinking about it and we think it's not the right case to do it.

And four of them said, even though the Supreme Court is free to declare that something,

this current state of the law is incompatible with human rights.

We don't think we should be doing it.

So I'm afraid that case convinced me that there was no...

easily sustainable moral distinction between turning off the ventilator.

And helping somebody.

to have a peaceful, dignified death in those circumstances.

So the issues are, In what circumstances?

What should the criteria be?

and Clearly, there have to be safeguards and procedures.

And so what should the safeguards and procedures be?

And there's loads to argue about in relation to both of those things, all of those things.

But the fundamental question, I think, yes we should have the freedom to ask other people to help us to die.

Those other people should be free to say no.

It's their choice just as much as it is the person who wishes to die's choice.

アプリをダウンロード

流暢に話すために必要なすべて

AI発音採点文ごとに採点

IPA練習すべての音をマスター

単語学習自分の単語帳を作る

単語ゲーム遊びながら覚える

QRをスキャン

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

同じチャンネル

The Great A.I. Debate: Should We Fear the Digital Revolution? [2015] | Intelligence Squared

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

Who Shares The Blame for the Mental Health Epidemic? - Will Self [2014] | Intelligence Squared

IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students

FOR YOU

このビデオで話す練習をする理由

このビデオは、人生の終わりや自己決定権に関する深い議論を提供しています。こうしたテーマについて話すことで、英語のスピーキングスキルを向上させることができます。特に、感情的な内容に触れることで、表現力や説得力を高める練習ができるため、英語シャドーイングやshadow speechの効果を最大限に引き出すことができます。また、YouTubeで英語学習をする際には、多様なトピックを扱ったビデオを活用することで、自分の意見や感情を語る能力が養われます。

文法と表現の文脈

このビデオでは、いくつかの重要な文法構造や表現が使用されています。以下に例を挙げます。

「Do we have the right to ...?」 - 権利に関する疑問を表現する構文。この構造を使うことで、質問を通して議論を展開することができます。
「We already have...」 - 現在の状況を説明する際に使われる「現在完了形」。完了した事柄や権利を強調することで、話の流れを安定させます。
「Should be free to ...」 - 助動詞「should」を用いた義務や可能性を表す構文。これにより、意見や希望を述べることができます。
「Incompatible with ...」 - 対立する概念や意見を示す際に有効な表現。批判的な意見を示す時に役立つでしょう。
「There have to be safeguards and procedures」 - 何かを達成するために必要な条件を説明する構造。政策やルールに関する議論でよく用いられます。

一般的な発音の落とし穴

このビデオには、発音が難しい英単語やフレーズがいくつか含まれています。特に注意が必要な点を挙げてみましょう。

「compatible」 - 「コンパティブル」と発音することを意識してください。しっかりと「タ」にアクセントを置くと、より自然に聞こえます。
「safeguards」 - この単語は「セーフガーズ」と発音されることが多いため、「ガー」の部分を明確に発音する練習が重要です。
「assistance」 - 「アシスタンス」と発音しますが、特に「タンス」の部分に気を付け、流れるように発音することが求められます。

これらの点に注意して英語の発音を練習すれば、shadowspeakのスキルを高めることができ、自信を持って意見を述べられるようになるでしょう。

この動画の文法

話し手がよく使っている文型を、動画の実際の表現とともに紹介します。

文型	動画での表現
受動態 be + 過去分詞 — 誰がするかより、何が起きるかに焦点を当てる	being interfered · be provided · were asked
関係詞節 who / which + 節 — 人や物について情報を加える	right, which is · person who wishes

シャドーイングとは？英語上達に効果的な理由

シャドーイング（Shadowing）は、もともとプロの通訳者養成プログラムで開発された言語学習法で、多言語習得者として知られるDr. Alexander Arguelles によって広く普及されました。方法はシンプルですが非常に効果的：ネイティブスピーカーの英語を聞きながら、1〜2秒の遅延で声に出してすぐに繰り返す——まるで「影（shadow）」のように話者を追いかけます。文法ドリルや受動的なリスニングと異なり、シャドーイングは脳と口の筋肉が同時にリアルタイムで英語を処理・再現することを強制します。研究により、発音精度、抑揚、リズム、連音、リスニング力、そして会話の流暢さが大幅に向上することが確認されています。IELTSスピーキング対策や自然な英語コミュニケーションを目指す方に特におすすめです。

シャドーイングのやり方: ステップ別の完全ガイドを読む →

シャドーイング練習: Lady Hale: Do We Have The Right To Die? - 動画で英語スピーキングを学ぶ

練習モードを選ぶ

アプリをダウンロード

同じチャンネル

The Great A.I. Debate: Should We Fear the Digital Revolution? [2015] | Intelligence Squared

Who Shares The Blame for the Mental Health Epidemic? - Will Self [2014] | Intelligence Squared

おすすめ動画

SCIENCE & MEDICINE - Dr. Death - Free Fall | 5

Don’t die before your death | Muniba Mazari

Are We Rejecting Them Because They’re Wrong—or Because We’re Unwell?

Why the Monarchy Should Have Died With the Queen

Human Immortality 4K | Can Science Defeat Aging?

Why do people smoke?

UNCENSORED: should the West be suspicious of Islam? Jonathan Sacerdoti, at the Oxford Union

Stuart & Cliffe Knechtle | Do Agnostics Just Want To Have Control? | Give Me an Answer

He Wanted To Die

Virtual love - How dangerous are AI relationships? | DW Documentary

Why We Can't Save Those We Love

ENGLISH SPEECH | INDIRA GANDHI: Vision for the Future (English Subtitles)

このビデオで話す練習をする理由

文法と表現の文脈

一般的な発音の落とし穴

この動画の文法

シャドーイングとは？英語上達に効果的な理由