Shadowing Practice: Five things you need to know for the 2026 midterms | America, Actually - Learn English Speaking with Video
Kies een oefenmodus
Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.
398 zinnen
Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.
1
We've already done a lot of reporting this year.
2
We went to a data center in New Jersey.
3
We talked to redistricting volunteers in Virginia.
4
I argued with the 24-year-old about whether Trump was still cool or not.
5
And we went to his UFC event in Washington, D.C.
6
But with the midterms right around the corner, I wanted to focus this week on a more simple question.
7
What matters most to voters when it comes to November?
8
So this week, we're going to do something a little different and answer your audience questions.
9
And y'all had a lot.
10
Who are the real swing voters?
11
How data centers will be affecting the election.
12
Where AIPAC is having the most influence.
13
Whether mail and voting is really being suppressed.
14
I love these questions because your lines of inquiry match up perfectly with the reporting we've done over the past year.
15
So this week, we're going to answer some of your concerns and pull out the trends that we have seen
16
throughout our time on the road.
17
Five things you need to know about this year's midterm elections.
18
The stakes, the candidates, the issues, we're cutting through all the noise.
19
It's a midterm study, guys.
20
Let's dig in.
21
Okay, so here's five things you need to know about the upcoming midterm elections.
22
The first is that both parties have changed significantly since 2024.
23
On the Republican side, the most important thing to know is that Donald Trump is deeply and increasingly unpopular.
24
The numbers are quite staggering.
25
The latest NBC News survey shows Donald Trump at his lowest approval rating ever.
26
And importantly, that number is driven by a change among Trump's own base.
27
41% of Republicans strongly approve of Trump's job performance.
28
That's down 11 percentage points from the spring.
29
and 62% of self-identified MAGA Republicans support the president.
30
That's down from 71% in the spring.
31
Even Trump's own allies are admitting the president may be in some trouble when it comes to the midterms.
32
Here's a clip from my interview with CJ Pearson, the MAGA influencer and mega Trump fan who we talked to a few weeks ago.
33
We have to reorient the conversation that we're having as a party around these domestic issues.
34
Or if not, we will lose disastrously in November.
35
But the question is, why is Donald Trump so unpopular?
36
And the answer starts with the economy.
37
People simply feel like Donald Trump hasn't followed through on his core campaign promise, lowering costs.
38
And while that started with tariffs, it's only gotten worse when we think about rising gas prices or the ongoing war with Iran.
39
We've heard about this a lot all over our travels.
40
like when we were out in Pennsylvania.
41
I voted for him with his promises to American people.
42
And I think he's let us down.
43
The controlling of the prices has skyrocketed.
44
We also heard this when we talked to people at Trump's UFC event in Washington, D.C.
45
Middle class, I want things that affect my life.
46
I want to see change in my regular day-to-day.
47
It's like, and I don't see that.
48
But the economy isn't the only reason that Trump is increasingly unpopular in his second term.
49
I think the Epstein files also has a lot to do with it.
50
You know, Trump got in a lot of trouble for not releasing the Epstein files in a timely and transparent fashion.
51
And we still hear about it on the campaign trail, particularly from some Republicans.
52
And I think this issue had a big effect on people's perception of him.
53
He was no longer the rich guy fighting against the elite insiders.
54
He was a member of the Insider Club, and people have perceived that.
55
After, you know, the Epstein files and everything should have just like ramped up with how he's been acting.
56
I feel like it was a lot more, you know, chill before that.
57
But while Trump remains unpopular, that doesn't mean that he's powerless.
58
Because he's won big in Republican primaries this year.
59
And that is driving the loyalty between him and the Republicans in Congress.
60
Trump took out his political enemies like Republican Thomas Massey or Texas Senator John Cornyn.
61
And while Trump's approval rating has diminished, he still remains in complete control of Republicans in Congress who have refused to break from him.
62
The reason why is because the most loyal primary voters are still mega Trump fans.
63
On the Democratic side, it's been an all out civil war as the party tries to recover from the embarrassment of the 2024 presidential election.
64
Now, most of these fights have pit the progressive left wing against the moderate establishment wing.
65
But I think it's a mistake to reduce it just to ideology.
66
Democrats are rethinking who they are and who they fight for.
67
And it's a conversation that is starting now, but won't conclude until the 2028 presidential primary.
68
Here's how Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed described the stakes to me in a recent interview.
69
For a long time, the Democratic Party has rested on its laurels that we're not them.
70
We don't win because he's so bad.
71
We win because he's so bad and we're so good.
72
El-Sayed is a strong supporter of Medicare for All and abolishing ICE, two of the signature policies of the progressive left.
73
But what's the signature policy of the moderate establishment wing?
74
That question's harder to answer.
75
Because most moderates would rather talk about stopping Trump or what they don't like about the left,
76
it's been a struggle to get them to talk about their own vision.
77
Here's a clip from my interview with Congressman Jim Clyburn of South Carolina.
78
This country is teetering on the brink.
79
And those of us who know this history, and those of us who know this system, and those of us who have the energy to fight it,
80
they better stay in this fight.
81
My second big takeaway is about the United States' relationship with Israel.
82
This has become a huge issue for voters, and we see it playing out all across the country.
83
You know, it may have started in the Biden administration, but the issue has certainly become more visceral,
84
particularly since the United States ignited a war with Iran at the urging of the Israeli government.
85
Public opinion has soured drastically on Israel, and you can already see it affecting the midterms.
86
Just recently, Vice President J.D.
87
Banz faced significant criticism from Republicans for his refusal to disavow Tucker Carlson,
88
the podcaster and former TV host who's become a vocal critic of the Israeli government and the Trump administration.
89
Tucker is a friend of mine.
90
Tucker is a friend despite the fact that we disagree on a number of things.
91
And I'm not going to play the game where I throw friends under the bus because I have political disagreements with him.
92
On the Democratic side, the Israel question may be best epitomized by the fight over Hassan Piker,
93
the leftist Twitch streamer who has begun campaigning with progressive candidates all across the country.
94
In our interview, Piker was clear.
95
He wants to change the Democratic Party, make it more vocally anti-war, more vocally anti-Israel.
96
He said there's no way the Democratic nominee in the next presidential primary can be pro-Israel.
97
Any kind of like sympathetic approach to Israel in 2028 will be electoral poison.
98
You won't be able to make it out of the Democratic primary.
99
So it's not even a concern for me at all.
100
Progressive congressional candidates like Daria Liza Avila Chevalier, who defeated a Democratic incumbent in New York City, have also made a similar case.
101
She articulated what amounts to a left-wing argument for America First, saying people want their tax dollars invested in communities at home,
102
not fighting foreign wars.
103
We are constantly being told that there are not enough resources for us while watching a livestream genocide being committed.
104
Our budgets are moral documents.
105
But the rise of the anti-Israel left has not come without controversy.
106
Third way, the centrist Democratic think tank in Washington has led a campaign to get Democrats to marginalize people like Piker, citing past controversial statements.
107
Cohen, the group's president, compared Piker to people like Nick Fuentes and Candace Owens.
108
And according to him, Democrats are embracing an extremist.
109
Democrats are going to beat MAGA and expand the map in the House, the Senate, and the White House.
110
The only way to do that is to offer an alternative to the extremism of Trumpism, not to mirror it.
111
You guys also called in with a bunch of questions about Israel and AIPAC.
112
Here are a few.
113
Noah calling in from Brooklyn.
114
And I'm curious about the upcoming election cycle, where AIPAC is having the most influence, what's happening to all of that money that's pouring in to different races,
115
are the candidates winning?
116
Hello, this is Devin from Salt Lake City, Utah.
117
I believe this is probably just as impactful as the Citizens United decision.
118
Thank you.
119
There's no doubt that corporate dollars and particularly money from AIPAC and the pro-Israel lobby was a big issue, particularly in Democratic primaries this year.
120
But when it comes to the general election, both parties will be flushed in corporate dollars.
121
And the question of finances may matter a little bit less in a race that has national attention.
122
That being said, there are a few races to watch when it comes to the Israel question specifically.
123
I'd point you to candidates like Angie Nixon in Florida, who has risen in that race partially
124
because of her willingness to call out what she said was a Democratic Party too beholden to the pro-Israel lobby.
125
I'd also point you to a couple progressive candidates running in important House districts, like William Lawrence in Michigan or Manny Routnal in Colorado.
126
These are people who have embraced the kind of America first messaging model by candidates like Daria Liza Avila Chevalier.
127
But can it work in a district that's more purple
128
and more central to the question of Democrats controlling the House in the next few years?
129
In these races, we'll get a sense about whether the anti-Israel message works in more battleground districts
130
or is this something that has more resonance in liberal, deep blue areas?
131
The third thing that sticks out to me is that everything is about affordability now.
132
The word has become ubiquitous in political world ever since New
133
York City Mayor Zohar Mamdani made it his signature campaign issue in 2025.
134
These days, it's in everybody's campaign ads.
135
Earlier this year, I talked to Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Greg Kazar about the affordability agenda that his caucus laid out.
136
And more importantly, I talked to him about what that word actually means.
137
Here's what he said.
138
He said, your rent is going up.
139
Let's blame it on some Venezuelan immigrants.
140
But it was not Wokeness that raised your rent.
141
It was a Wall Street hedge fund.
142
The fourth takeaway, and a big one from our year of reporting, is all about AI.
143
People are concerned about affordability and the economy, But that concern is explicitly tied to mass anxiety about the future of work,
144
especially in the age of artificial intelligence.
145
AI has changed everything and the voters know it.
146
And they're upset with the political system that has not proactively protected them against the changing society.
147
Listen to what we heard at a town hall in New Jersey when it comes to data centers.
148
I did so much else.
149
I told you.
150
People come in.
151
I have a woman who came back twice, had cash, and realized it was near the data center.
152
Her children said, Mom, she says, I just can't do this.
153
And this fear is especially true among the youngest voters.
154
When we dug into all things Gen Z with researcher Rachel Jamfaza,
155
she said that concerns about affordability and jobs cannot be separated from concerns about AI.
156
It's all connected.
157
When you're talking about the biggest issues and what's affecting young people's lives, AI is at the center of that.
158
And a lot of you had questions about AI, data centers, and its potential impact in the midterms.
159
Here are a few.
160
I'm calling because you asked about what we're most interested in for the November election.
161
And something I'm particularly interested in is how data centers will be affecting the election.
162
I'm Kim from Chicago.
163
I'm 35.
164
And my biggest questions about the economy going to midterms are AI and jobs.
165
When it comes to AI and data centers, there are so many races to watch.
166
This may be the most talked about issue of this midterm elections.
167
But I think there's a couple races that are worth calling out specifically.
168
First, of course, the Senate race in Michigan.
169
Progressive Democrat Abdul El-Sayed has stopped short of calling for a moratorium on data centers throughout the year.
170
But just in the last week, he's just changed his tone.
171
He said that this is a break glass moment for AI development
172
and that development needs to be paused right now to get a sense of its potential impact.
173
That also comes as his Republican opponent, Mike Rogers, has himself called for a one year moratorium on data centers.
174
Both candidates are really fighting to show themselves as the AI regulator in that race, which I think speaks to the public opinion shift on the issue.
175
The second race worth watching is down in Texas.
176
Texas originally welcomed AI and data centers, but Governor Greg Abbott has since made a little bit of a U-turn.
177
In the last couple weeks, he says that data centers dug their own grave with the public, which again signals how sentiment has shifted on this issue,
178
not just among Democrats, but among Republicans and with independents.
179
But the fifth thing you need to know this midterms is all about election security.
180
And I got to say, this was the topic that we got more questions about than any other.
181
People are clearly concerned about the validity of our democratic system, the role of the Supreme Court, and concerned about things like mail-in ballots.
182
So we're going to answer all your questions coming up next.
183
Support for this show comes from Mint Mobile.
184
Summer's not over yet, and neither is Mint Mobile's summer sale.
185
You can lower your monthly phone bill by signing up for one of their premium wireless plans for only $15 a month.
186
All of Mint Mobile's plans come with high-speed 5G data plus unlimited talk and text.
187
We have a colleague here at Vox who's made the switch to Mint Mobile, and he swears by it.
188
He says that Mint lets him save a bunch of money every month, and he's never run into any issue where his coverage might be limited.
189
To get your new wireless plan for just $15 a month, go to mintmobile.com slash estead.
190
That's mintmobile.com slash A-S-T-E-A-D.
191
Cut your wireless bill to $15 a month at mintmobile.com slash estead.
192
That's it.
193
There's no catch.
194
Upfront payment of $45 for three months, $90 for six months, and $180 for 12 months.
195
Plan required.
196
$15 per month equivalent.
197
Taxes and fees extra, initial plan term only.
198
Greater than 50 gigabytes may slow when network is busy.
199
Includes up to 20 gigabyte hotspot.
200
Capable device required.
201
Availability, speed, and coverage varies.
202
See MintMobile.com for more. So by
203
far the number one question that we got from y'all was all about election integrity.
204
People are clearly concerned about the rules of our democratic process, the redistricting wars, the role the Supreme Court might play in this election,
205
and of course, Donald Trump's threats to declare a national emergency ahead of November.
206
So to help me out, I called up Vox political editor Benji Sarland.
207
Benji has been helping us shape our political coverage throughout the year, and he's been tracking these issues very closely.
208
Thanks, Benji, for joining us.
209
Thanks so much, Estad.
210
Okay, so I want to get to our audience questions, and we're going to start with the state of play when it comes to redistricting.
211
Now, earlier this summer, we heard how the GOP was basically trying to hijack the
212
political process to exert pressure on state lawmakers to draw more safe conservative districts to give them an advantage in the midterms.
213
And then the Democrats responded with their own redistricting moves in places like California, and they tried to do so in Virginia.
214
Here's some of what we heard from Cook Political Report's Amy Walter over the summer.
215
The primary process has become as corrupted as it was back then.
216
Most people who get elected to Congress are going to be elected in seats that are pretty safely red or safely blue.
217
The primaries matter more than anything.
218
You can create all the reforms you want, but if people feel like the system is broken, they're not going to participate.
219
And we heard even more about this issue
220
when we traveled to Virginia's first congressional district the maps are a problem
221
and they're always going to be a problem
222
when you know just there's going to be backroom deals making maps
223
that strategically disadvantage one party over the other people start to
224
feel like what does it matter like i i tried
225
and we're doing all these things and we even voted
226
and we we said you know used our voice
227
and it still didn't work confirms that kind of negative feeling people already have
228
that lack of agency benji where did this all land do republicans actually have a structural advantage
229
when it comes to redistricting as we get to November?
230
So this is a very confusing process.
231
It's different from state to state.
232
The court is involved.
233
And in fact, they're still involved right up to this week.
234
Missouri has been trying to eliminate a Democratic seat.
235
It got stopped by a Supreme Court decision, then possibly approved by a different court decision just minutes later.
236
But the Virginia redistricting move that would have favored Democrats was tossed out for procedural reasons.
237
And Republicans are probably going to have an advantage in, let's say, 10 to 12 additional seats by some estimates.
238
Now, what does that mean?
239
It means there are fewer competitive seats overall.
240
And Democrats, depending on your estimate, may need to win the national popular vote by three, four, five points to win a House majority.
241
But Democrats are still favored by many election forecasters to win the House.
242
So why is that?
243
One, Democrats are leading by quite a bit in national polls.
244
It's about six and a half points, according to Nate Silver's latest polling average.
245
Second, Republicans have a very narrow majority.
246
So Democrats don't actually need to net a ton of new seats to win a majority.
247
Third, if Democrats really start hitting the higher end of that polling,
248
even some gerrymandered seats might fall because the way gerrymanders work is that they spread their vote margins across more seats, which makes them easier to win,
249
but also raises the chance of an upset in some of them.
250
So in Texas in particular, there are some Republican concerns that they might not be able to hold on to every seat they plan to gain.
251
Now, this shouldn't make you any less upset about it.
252
It's politicians choosing their own voters now after every election instead
253
of just 10 years to try to pull up the ladder behind them.
254
It goes against the spirit of our democratic system and accountability and representation.
255
But if you're worried the election is canceled, that is not the case.
256
This is a highly competitive race.
257
Your vote does matter.
258
You mentioned the Supreme Court in that answer, and that really leads us to a couple audience questions we got on that front.
259
You know, it seems as if the fear
260
that the Supreme Court could have a big impact on election security is really visceral for some of our audience.
261
Take a listen to a couple of these questions.
262
I want to learn more about whether mail and voting is really being suppressed.
263
I have read about an executive order that outlines all these changes that states are unable to comply to, but yet it's law, but maybe it's going to get blocked.
264
I really have an existential fear that in the end, the Supreme Court might rule that it's okay to suppress vote by mail and the U.S.
265
Postal Service will just not deliver our ballot.
266
And it just feels like this very scary possibility.
267
So how valid do you think the concern is that the Supreme Court might hand Republicans further advantage?
268
So let's start with the basics here.
269
Nobody can just presume any decision is guaranteed by the Supreme Court.
270
It's a very conservative one.
271
They zig sometimes when people thought they were going to zag.
272
However, what Trump is trying to do is still seen as
273
at least a relative long shot in the courts for a few reasons.
274
So Trump has tried this executive order, among other attempts to influence elections, and the Supreme Court is ultimately expected to weigh in.
275
Now, one, we have separation of powers.
276
Generally, federal government, especially the executive branch, is not supposed to be changing election law by executive order.
277
The courts have not looked favorably on prior attempts to mess with elections.
278
A fundamentally state and local driven apparatus is our elections.
279
Yes.
280
And bear in mind, Trump, when he was president, tried to do everything possible to overturn the 2020 election in multiple states.
281
Those went nowhere in federal courts.
282
Those went nowhere in the Supreme Court.
283
So it is worth, you know, they have been willing to buck him in the past on this based on what is pretty well-established precedent.
284
There is also a Supreme Court theory that this particular conservative Supreme Court has cultivated and advanced called the Major Questions Doctrine,
285
which was used most famously to overturn some democratic priorities, like canceling student loans en masse.
286
But it basically says if there is a major change to policy, it should be Congress that is specifically weighing in on it
287
and not some kind of loophole through existing law that the White House uses to try to force it through.
288
So in this case, Congress has not passed some giant mail-in ballot reform bill.
289
In fact, there have been lots of bills discussed that have not been passed related to elections in the last few years.
290
So there's a decent chance even the conservatives might look at this and say, look, if Congress wants to change this, that's their business.
291
But we have a precedent that we have established and safeguarded that this law should, you know, clearly what Trump is trying to do should clearly not pass muster on.
292
But I think people's concern is just the intimidation factor.
293
Also, it feels as if sometimes this administration looks to succeed in policy, but they also just look to push a narrative out there.
294
And we do see Trump using these executive orders to do what he's done consistently, which is just cast doubt on the integrity of the system.
295
Exactly.
296
And the good news is that while that propaganda can be very dangerous in its own right, and it was a massive factor in,
297
you know, most especially the January 6th riot at the Capitol, that is to some degree separate from this legal question of will your votes actually be counted?
298
Will you be able to get in your ballot on time?
299
So it is important to at least separate things.
300
I mean, one way people interpret this sometimes is Trump is pre-spinning a loss.
301
You know, he actually talks often about how presidents usually, you know, their party usually does poorly in the midterms.
302
And I have no doubt if it does go poorly the day after the midterms will say, ah, you know, the Supreme Court and Congress should have gone along with all my election rules.
303
But if I hear you correctly, you're saying the Donald Trump intimidation factor is in one hand,
304
but you think the actual legal question is maybe less certain
305
to fall in his favor as his intimidation kind of bully pulpit methods.
306
Yes.
307
And you should absolutely take the legal side seriously.
308
We're taking it very seriously here.
309
Our reporters are tracking it closely.
310
As I said, nothing's guaranteed, but it is still a very difficult path that so far he has had zero success in.
311
Okay.
312
Let's get to the kind of last point that gave folks real concern.
313
And we've really referenced it already.
314
The president has made constant threats to declare a national emergency ahead of the election or have military of some form, even ICE at the polling locations.
315
And of course there is the ever present fear He'll run 2020 playbook again and seek to invalidate said results.
316
Just listen to some of the concerns that we heard from our listeners.
317
Every day I see something online where the headline is,
318
how is Trump or how is the Republican party going to invalidate the result?
319
I wonder if there is actual real fear,
320
a real possibility that election results could be challenged and tested and what that would really mean for all of us.
321
This is my kind of overwhelming, all-consuming worry.
322
I think it's well-founded, but I hope that it's not.
323
Okay, so how real do we think people should take the threat of Trump declaring a national emergency ahead of the midterm election?
324
So some of this gets into some of the issues we discussed, which is overturning results, seizing ballots, things like that, very difficult.
325
Now, it should be noted because people are mentioning some specific Trumpy threats involving, say, a state of emergency or,
326
you know, the kind of things we saw in Los Angeles or Minneapolis with ICE raids, where you just have lots of federal agents just all over the place
327
or the National Guard in Washington, D.C and other places.
328
Now, there are legal barriers to sending federal agents to polling sites, too.
329
The law prohibits federal troops or armed agents at polling sites unless they're responding to some immediate national security threat.
330
So far, there is no plan to deploy the National Guard or ICE at polling places.
331
It's come up in the news.
332
Trump officials and DHS have been asked about it.
333
And once again, the courts would be the ultimate bulwark against.
334
Now, does that mean you should take everyone's word here?
335
No. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
336
There's always the possibility.
337
Important is that.
338
There's always the possibility, especially in something time limited like an election, that Trump ignores the law.
339
But it's not easy.
340
And also remember, the backlash to such a move could also be greater than the intended effect.
341
You know, a lot of Republicans to this day blame Trump's election denial
342
after 2020 for costing them those two Georgia Senate seats
343
that Democrats now hold in a runoff because it encouraged Black voters in particular, who are very used to threats of disenfranchisement, to turn out like crazy in the runoff.
344
And it also potentially depressed Trump's own supporters because they decided that their votes didn't count.
345
But I wanted to ask, like, we've started this by talking about Donald Trump's deep unpopularity, his increasing unpopularity even among his own base.
346
So that kind of leads me to another question.
347
I mean, Trump has contested every election loss he's been a part of, but he's not on the ballot this November.
348
He's not on the ballot, theoretically, in 2028.
349
So if he does what people are afraid of in terms of declaring a national emergency
350
or trying to bring military personnel to polling places, what do we think the likelihood that the GOP follows him down that path?
351
I mean, are we talking about a party that will follow his election denial to its logical end?
352
So far, elections have been a red line where Republicans, for the most part, have not gone along with these kinds of things.
353
Bear in mind also that if you do something illegal, you can be prosecuted.
354
And in many cases, it's state law that applies, which Trump cannot pardon you for.
355
I would also add that election deniers, like hardcore election deniers, people who really got involved in politics around Trump's election conspiracies,
356
have not won a lot of elections.
357
Yeah.
358
Famously in 2022, even when Democrats were having a rough midterm cycle in many ways,
359
those candidates cost them race after race in governor's races and secretary of state races and Senate races.
360
Now, some of those folks are on the ballot this time.
361
That could change potentially.
362
You might have in future elections, folks who are more aggressively devoted to him.
363
But for the most part, he has not been able to drag the party along on this.
364
Okay.
365
So if I can sum up what I feel like I heard from you, we are acknowledging that the concern or the fear
366
that we're hearing from people around election integrity is certainly valid because of what Donald Trump has said, because of his own history of election denial,
367
and because of the ongoing role the courts have in deciding things around this, like a mail-in ballots, executive order, or even some of these redistricting wars.
368
However, there seems to be a little bit of a logistical problem with the question of like seizing ballots
369
or interfering on election day, partially because of the state and federal separation of powers when it comes to election administration.
370
Yeah.
371
I mean, one way to think of it with a lot of these situations with Trump is
372
that let's say you are in a house and there is a mass serial killer trying to get in through your window.
373
And then he tries to use your doorknob and try to shake the doorknob.
374
And then he tries to get in through the chimney.
375
and the whole time you're saying, well, it's a good thing that I reinforce the windows and
376
that the door is like reinforced steel and that I block the chimney
377
and that I have a ring camera and that I know to let the police in.
378
But you still would be pretty unnerved by this serial killer trying every which way to get into your house, right?
379
I might move, you know?
380
Yes.
381
So I don't want to understate the threat.
382
Obviously, if Trump could snap his fingers and overturn elections, he could.
383
And we know this because he tried to do it explicitly many, many times
384
but it is not easy for him to do.
385
Thank you, Benji, for rounding out our study guide.
386
I think this is important because it really was the number one question people have for us beyond candidates, beyond issues.
387
It's really a concern about the system itself.
388
And so I feel like this type of check-in will go a long way.
389
We appreciate your time.
390
We'll see you soon.
391
See you soon, Asad.
392
America actually will be in your feeds every Saturday with an interesting interview in politics or culture.
393
And you can also listen to America actually wherever you get your podcasts or in the Today Explained feed.
394
The best way to support this show is by becoming a Vox member.
395
Members get a bonus segment on Patreon every week, and we are very grateful for their support.
396
Just go to Vox.com slash members to join.
397
See you all next week, and cue the music.
398
Thank you.
App downloaden
Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken
AI UitspraakScoor elke zin
IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid
WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op
WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt
Zelfde Kanaal
C11
Why financial literacy education in the US sucks
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
How to be less neurotic | The Gray Area
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B22
We’re already using AI more than we realize
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
The Ticketmaster monopoly is over, now what?
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B22
The biggest peach myth in America
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B28
How to solve problems like a designer
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B22
The origin of the '80s aesthetic
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B217
Why “Buy one, get one free” isn’t a great deal
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B22
How F1 drivers survive their own cars
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B22
White, pink, and brown noise, explained #shorts
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B210
Why 350°F is the magic number for baking
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B26
How did pink become a girly color?
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C12
Why China's population is shrinking
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B22
The real reason Boeing's new plane crashed twice
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
Why AI art struggles with hands
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B22
Why is everything getting so expensive?
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
Proof of evolution that you can find on your body
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B22
How Vladimir Putin won Republicans' approval
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B25
Zohran Mamdani on his first priorities as NYC mayor (Full video interview)
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B210
Why we say “OK”
University StudentsWorking Adults
FOR YOU
Aanbevolen Video
B21
198 zinnen
Trump Is Hot for Tim Scott & Susan Collins Side-Eyes Troy Jackson's Second Cousin | The Daily Show
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B23
84 zinnen
Data centres and U.S. midterm elections | Vietnam Today
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B29
13 zinnen
Labor's near record poll plunge | 9 News Australia
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B21
158 zinnen
🚨Trump WANTS FOX OFF THE AIR after They SHOWED THIS!
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B22
283 zinnen
Barack Obama: The 2020 60 Minutes interview
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
146 zinnen
Trump REVERSES course, tells Republicans to vote by mail now
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
424 zinnen
Why Latino voters have turned on Trump | America, Actually
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B298 zinnen
Trump’s MAGA Civil War Just EXPLODED On Camera
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B21
58 zinnen
AOC vs. MTG on Palestine: the voting records don't lie
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C14
614 zinnen
DEM SUPERMAJORITY?: WILD Midterm Scenarios IN PLAY
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B22
154 zinnen
The View Tried to Corner Stephen A. Smith. It Backfired.
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les
Deze spreekles op niveau B2 is gebaseerd op de video “Five things you need to know for the 2026 midterms”. Deze video bevat 398 zinnen en 5311 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 30:40. De spreker praat in een natuurlijk tempo van ongeveer 173 woorden per minuut, dicht bij een alledaags gesprek. 84% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden; de rest kun je beter vooraf bekijken.
Belangrijke woorden in deze video
De 15 moeilijkste woorden uit de video, met uitspraak en betekenis:
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| midterm bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˈmɪdˌtɚm/ | tussentijds |
| ballot zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈbælət/ | stembiljet |
| voter zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈvoʊtɚ/ | stemmer, stemster |
| affordability zelfstandig naamwoord | betaalbaarheid | |
| unpopular bijvoeglijk naamwoord | impopulair | |
| declare werkwoord | /dɪˈklɛɚ/ | verklaren |
| intimidation zelfstandig naamwoord | /ɪntɪmɪˈdeɪʃən/ | intimidatie |
| overturn werkwoord | /ˌəʊvə(ɹ)ˈtɜː(ɹ)n/ | kapseizen, omslaan |
| denial zelfstandig naamwoord | /dɪˈnaɪ.əl/ | weigering |
| wireless bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˈwaɪ(jə)ɹ.ləs/ | draadloos |
| invalidate werkwoord | /ɪnˈvæl.əˌdeɪt/ | ontkrachten |
| moratorium zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˌmɔ.ɹəˈtɔ.ɹi.əm/ | moratorium |
| takeaway zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈteɪkəweɪ/ | afhaalmaaltijd |
| unpopularity zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˌʌnˌpɒpjʊˈlæɹɪti/ | impopulariteit |
| visceral bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˈvɪsəɹəl/ | visceraal |
Phrasal verbs die je zult horen
| Woord | Betekenis |
|---|---|
| come back werkwoord | terugkomen |
| turn out werkwoord | uitvallen, resulteren |
Zinnen om te herhalen
Korte, volledige zinnen uit de video die je in alledaagse gesprekken kunt gebruiken:
- We've already done a lot of reporting this year.
- It's like, and I don't see that.
- We don't win because he's so bad.
- Will you be able to get in your ballot on time?
- We're taking it very seriously here.
Grammatica in deze video
De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:
| Structuur | In de video |
|---|---|
| Present perfect continuous have/has been + -ing — iets dat eerder begon en nog bezig is | he's been acting · has been helping · has been trying |
| Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telt | We've already done · we've done · have seen |
| Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet | being suppressed · is driven · being told |
| Betrekkelijke bijzinnen who / which + zin — extra informatie over een persoon of ding | people who have · woman who came · people who get |
Uitspraak om op te letten
De spreker gebruikt 51 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals we're, I'm, don't. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.
- De klanken “sh” en “zh”: intimidation /ɪntɪmɪˈdeɪʃən/, congressional /kəŋˈɡɹɛ.ʃə.nəl/, separation /ˌsɛp.əˈɹeɪ.ʃən/, partially /ˈpɑɹʃəli/, structural /ˈstɹʌk(t͡)ʃəɹəl/
- Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: intimidation /ɪntɪmɪˈdeɪʃən/, congressional /kəŋˈɡɹɛ.ʃə.nəl/, invalidate /ɪnˈvæl.əˌdeɪt/, moratorium /ˌmɔ.ɹəˈtɔ.ɹi.əm/, unpopularity /ˌʌnˌpɒpjʊˈlæɹɪti/
Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:
- Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: seize /ˈsiːz/, confuse /kənˈfjuːz/, perceive /pɚˈsiv/, colleague /ˈkɒliːɡ/, approve /əˈpɹuːv/
- /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: ballot /ˈbælət/, invalidate /ɪnˈvæl.əˌdeɪt/, unpopularity /ˌʌnˌpɒpjʊˈlæɹɪti/, rat /ɹæt/, transparent /tɹænsˈpæɹənt/
- /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: congressional /kəŋˈɡɹɛ.ʃə.nəl/, mega /ˈmɛɡə/, colleague /ˈkɒliːɡ/, immigrant /ˈɪmɪɡɹənt/, youngest /ˈjʌŋ.ɡɪst/
Zo oefen je met deze video
- Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
- Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
- Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als midterm, ballot, voter.
Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?
Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.