शैडोइंग अभ्यास: Five things you need to know for the 2026 midterms | America, Actually - वीडियो के साथ अंग्रेजी बोलना सीखें

अभ्यास मोड चुनें

हर मोड पूरी स्क्रीन का अभ्यास कक्ष खोलता है।

398 वाक्य

यदि वाक्य बहुत छोटे या लंबे हों, तो समायोजित करने के लिए Edit पर क्लिक करें।

We've already done a lot of reporting this year.

We went to a data center in New Jersey.

We talked to redistricting volunteers in Virginia.

I argued with the 24-year-old about whether Trump was still cool or not.

And we went to his UFC event in Washington, D.C.

But with the midterms right around the corner, I wanted to focus this week on a more simple question.

What matters most to voters when it comes to November?

So this week, we're going to do something a little different and answer your audience questions.

And y'all had a lot.

Who are the real swing voters?

How data centers will be affecting the election.

Where AIPAC is having the most influence.

Whether mail and voting is really being suppressed.

I love these questions because your lines of inquiry match up perfectly with the reporting we've done over the past year.

So this week, we're going to answer some of your concerns and pull out the trends that we have seen

throughout our time on the road.

Five things you need to know about this year's midterm elections.

The stakes, the candidates, the issues, we're cutting through all the noise.

It's a midterm study, guys.

Let's dig in.

Okay, so here's five things you need to know about the upcoming midterm elections.

The first is that both parties have changed significantly since 2024.

On the Republican side, the most important thing to know is that Donald Trump is deeply and increasingly unpopular.

The numbers are quite staggering.

The latest NBC News survey shows Donald Trump at his lowest approval rating ever.

And importantly, that number is driven by a change among Trump's own base.

41% of Republicans strongly approve of Trump's job performance.

That's down 11 percentage points from the spring.

and 62% of self-identified MAGA Republicans support the president.

That's down from 71% in the spring.

Even Trump's own allies are admitting the president may be in some trouble when it comes to the midterms.

Here's a clip from my interview with CJ Pearson, the MAGA influencer and mega Trump fan who we talked to a few weeks ago.

We have to reorient the conversation that we're having as a party around these domestic issues.

Or if not, we will lose disastrously in November.

But the question is, why is Donald Trump so unpopular?

And the answer starts with the economy.

People simply feel like Donald Trump hasn't followed through on his core campaign promise, lowering costs.

And while that started with tariffs, it's only gotten worse when we think about rising gas prices or the ongoing war with Iran.

We've heard about this a lot all over our travels.

like when we were out in Pennsylvania.

I voted for him with his promises to American people.

And I think he's let us down.

The controlling of the prices has skyrocketed.

We also heard this when we talked to people at Trump's UFC event in Washington, D.C.

Middle class, I want things that affect my life.

I want to see change in my regular day-to-day.

It's like, and I don't see that.

But the economy isn't the only reason that Trump is increasingly unpopular in his second term.

I think the Epstein files also has a lot to do with it.

You know, Trump got in a lot of trouble for not releasing the Epstein files in a timely and transparent fashion.

And we still hear about it on the campaign trail, particularly from some Republicans.

And I think this issue had a big effect on people's perception of him.

He was no longer the rich guy fighting against the elite insiders.

He was a member of the Insider Club, and people have perceived that.

After, you know, the Epstein files and everything should have just like ramped up with how he's been acting.

I feel like it was a lot more, you know, chill before that.

But while Trump remains unpopular, that doesn't mean that he's powerless.

Because he's won big in Republican primaries this year.

And that is driving the loyalty between him and the Republicans in Congress.

Trump took out his political enemies like Republican Thomas Massey or Texas Senator John Cornyn.

And while Trump's approval rating has diminished, he still remains in complete control of Republicans in Congress who have refused to break from him.

The reason why is because the most loyal primary voters are still mega Trump fans.

On the Democratic side, it's been an all out civil war as the party tries to recover from the embarrassment of the 2024 presidential election.

Now, most of these fights have pit the progressive left wing against the moderate establishment wing.

But I think it's a mistake to reduce it just to ideology.

Democrats are rethinking who they are and who they fight for.

And it's a conversation that is starting now, but won't conclude until the 2028 presidential primary.

Here's how Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed described the stakes to me in a recent interview.

For a long time, the Democratic Party has rested on its laurels that we're not them.

We don't win because he's so bad.

We win because he's so bad and we're so good.

El-Sayed is a strong supporter of Medicare for All and abolishing ICE, two of the signature policies of the progressive left.

But what's the signature policy of the moderate establishment wing?

That question's harder to answer.

Because most moderates would rather talk about stopping Trump or what they don't like about the left,

it's been a struggle to get them to talk about their own vision.

Here's a clip from my interview with Congressman Jim Clyburn of South Carolina.

This country is teetering on the brink.

And those of us who know this history, and those of us who know this system, and those of us who have the energy to fight it,

they better stay in this fight.

My second big takeaway is about the United States' relationship with Israel.

This has become a huge issue for voters, and we see it playing out all across the country.

You know, it may have started in the Biden administration, but the issue has certainly become more visceral,

particularly since the United States ignited a war with Iran at the urging of the Israeli government.

Public opinion has soured drastically on Israel, and you can already see it affecting the midterms.

Just recently, Vice President J.D.

Banz faced significant criticism from Republicans for his refusal to disavow Tucker Carlson,

the podcaster and former TV host who's become a vocal critic of the Israeli government and the Trump administration.

Tucker is a friend of mine.

Tucker is a friend despite the fact that we disagree on a number of things.

And I'm not going to play the game where I throw friends under the bus because I have political disagreements with him.

On the Democratic side, the Israel question may be best epitomized by the fight over Hassan Piker,

the leftist Twitch streamer who has begun campaigning with progressive candidates all across the country.

In our interview, Piker was clear.

He wants to change the Democratic Party, make it more vocally anti-war, more vocally anti-Israel.

He said there's no way the Democratic nominee in the next presidential primary can be pro-Israel.

Any kind of like sympathetic approach to Israel in 2028 will be electoral poison.

You won't be able to make it out of the Democratic primary.

So it's not even a concern for me at all.

100

Progressive congressional candidates like Daria Liza Avila Chevalier, who defeated a Democratic incumbent in New York City, have also made a similar case.

101

She articulated what amounts to a left-wing argument for America First, saying people want their tax dollars invested in communities at home,

102

not fighting foreign wars.

103

We are constantly being told that there are not enough resources for us while watching a livestream genocide being committed.

104

Our budgets are moral documents.

105

But the rise of the anti-Israel left has not come without controversy.

106

Third way, the centrist Democratic think tank in Washington has led a campaign to get Democrats to marginalize people like Piker, citing past controversial statements.

107

Cohen, the group's president, compared Piker to people like Nick Fuentes and Candace Owens.

108

And according to him, Democrats are embracing an extremist.

109

Democrats are going to beat MAGA and expand the map in the House, the Senate, and the White House.

110

The only way to do that is to offer an alternative to the extremism of Trumpism, not to mirror it.

111

You guys also called in with a bunch of questions about Israel and AIPAC.

112

Here are a few.

113

Noah calling in from Brooklyn.

114

And I'm curious about the upcoming election cycle, where AIPAC is having the most influence, what's happening to all of that money that's pouring in to different races,

115

are the candidates winning?

116

Hello, this is Devin from Salt Lake City, Utah.

117

I believe this is probably just as impactful as the Citizens United decision.

118

Thank you.

119

There's no doubt that corporate dollars and particularly money from AIPAC and the pro-Israel lobby was a big issue, particularly in Democratic primaries this year.

120

But when it comes to the general election, both parties will be flushed in corporate dollars.

121

And the question of finances may matter a little bit less in a race that has national attention.

122

That being said, there are a few races to watch when it comes to the Israel question specifically.

123

I'd point you to candidates like Angie Nixon in Florida, who has risen in that race partially

124

because of her willingness to call out what she said was a Democratic Party too beholden to the pro-Israel lobby.

125

I'd also point you to a couple progressive candidates running in important House districts, like William Lawrence in Michigan or Manny Routnal in Colorado.

126

These are people who have embraced the kind of America first messaging model by candidates like Daria Liza Avila Chevalier.

127

But can it work in a district that's more purple

128

and more central to the question of Democrats controlling the House in the next few years?

129

In these races, we'll get a sense about whether the anti-Israel message works in more battleground districts

130

or is this something that has more resonance in liberal, deep blue areas?

131

The third thing that sticks out to me is that everything is about affordability now.

132

The word has become ubiquitous in political world ever since New

133

York City Mayor Zohar Mamdani made it his signature campaign issue in 2025.

134

These days, it's in everybody's campaign ads.

135

Earlier this year, I talked to Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Greg Kazar about the affordability agenda that his caucus laid out.

136

And more importantly, I talked to him about what that word actually means.

137

Here's what he said.

138

He said, your rent is going up.

139

Let's blame it on some Venezuelan immigrants.

140

But it was not Wokeness that raised your rent.

141

It was a Wall Street hedge fund.

142

The fourth takeaway, and a big one from our year of reporting, is all about AI.

143

People are concerned about affordability and the economy, But that concern is explicitly tied to mass anxiety about the future of work,

144

especially in the age of artificial intelligence.

145

AI has changed everything and the voters know it.

146

And they're upset with the political system that has not proactively protected them against the changing society.

147

Listen to what we heard at a town hall in New Jersey when it comes to data centers.

148

I did so much else.

149

I told you.

150

People come in.

151

I have a woman who came back twice, had cash, and realized it was near the data center.

152

Her children said, Mom, she says, I just can't do this.

153

And this fear is especially true among the youngest voters.

154

When we dug into all things Gen Z with researcher Rachel Jamfaza,

155

she said that concerns about affordability and jobs cannot be separated from concerns about AI.

156

It's all connected.

157

When you're talking about the biggest issues and what's affecting young people's lives, AI is at the center of that.

158

And a lot of you had questions about AI, data centers, and its potential impact in the midterms.

159

Here are a few.

160

I'm calling because you asked about what we're most interested in for the November election.

161

And something I'm particularly interested in is how data centers will be affecting the election.

162

I'm Kim from Chicago.

163

I'm 35.

164

And my biggest questions about the economy going to midterms are AI and jobs.

165

When it comes to AI and data centers, there are so many races to watch.

166

This may be the most talked about issue of this midterm elections.

167

But I think there's a couple races that are worth calling out specifically.

168

First, of course, the Senate race in Michigan.

169

Progressive Democrat Abdul El-Sayed has stopped short of calling for a moratorium on data centers throughout the year.

170

But just in the last week, he's just changed his tone.

171

He said that this is a break glass moment for AI development

172

and that development needs to be paused right now to get a sense of its potential impact.

173

That also comes as his Republican opponent, Mike Rogers, has himself called for a one year moratorium on data centers.

174

Both candidates are really fighting to show themselves as the AI regulator in that race, which I think speaks to the public opinion shift on the issue.

175

The second race worth watching is down in Texas.

176

Texas originally welcomed AI and data centers, but Governor Greg Abbott has since made a little bit of a U-turn.

177

In the last couple weeks, he says that data centers dug their own grave with the public, which again signals how sentiment has shifted on this issue,

178

not just among Democrats, but among Republicans and with independents.

179

But the fifth thing you need to know this midterms is all about election security.

180

And I got to say, this was the topic that we got more questions about than any other.

181

People are clearly concerned about the validity of our democratic system, the role of the Supreme Court, and concerned about things like mail-in ballots.

182

So we're going to answer all your questions coming up next.

183

Support for this show comes from Mint Mobile.

184

Summer's not over yet, and neither is Mint Mobile's summer sale.

185

You can lower your monthly phone bill by signing up for one of their premium wireless plans for only $15 a month.

186

All of Mint Mobile's plans come with high-speed 5G data plus unlimited talk and text.

187

We have a colleague here at Vox who's made the switch to Mint Mobile, and he swears by it.

188

He says that Mint lets him save a bunch of money every month, and he's never run into any issue where his coverage might be limited.

189

To get your new wireless plan for just $15 a month, go to mintmobile.com slash estead.

190

That's mintmobile.com slash A-S-T-E-A-D.

191

Cut your wireless bill to $15 a month at mintmobile.com slash estead.

192

That's it.

193

There's no catch.

194

Upfront payment of $45 for three months, $90 for six months, and $180 for 12 months.

195

Plan required.

196

$15 per month equivalent.

197

Taxes and fees extra, initial plan term only.

198

Greater than 50 gigabytes may slow when network is busy.

199

Includes up to 20 gigabyte hotspot.

200

Capable device required.

201

Availability, speed, and coverage varies.

202

See MintMobile.com for more. So by

203

far the number one question that we got from y'all was all about election integrity.

204

People are clearly concerned about the rules of our democratic process, the redistricting wars, the role the Supreme Court might play in this election,

205

and of course, Donald Trump's threats to declare a national emergency ahead of November.

206

So to help me out, I called up Vox political editor Benji Sarland.

207

Benji has been helping us shape our political coverage throughout the year, and he's been tracking these issues very closely.

208

Thanks, Benji, for joining us.

209

Thanks so much, Estad.

210

Okay, so I want to get to our audience questions, and we're going to start with the state of play when it comes to redistricting.

211

Now, earlier this summer, we heard how the GOP was basically trying to hijack the

212

political process to exert pressure on state lawmakers to draw more safe conservative districts to give them an advantage in the midterms.

213

And then the Democrats responded with their own redistricting moves in places like California, and they tried to do so in Virginia.

214

Here's some of what we heard from Cook Political Report's Amy Walter over the summer.

215

The primary process has become as corrupted as it was back then.

216

Most people who get elected to Congress are going to be elected in seats that are pretty safely red or safely blue.

217

The primaries matter more than anything.

218

You can create all the reforms you want, but if people feel like the system is broken, they're not going to participate.

219

And we heard even more about this issue

220

when we traveled to Virginia's first congressional district the maps are a problem

221

and they're always going to be a problem

222

when you know just there's going to be backroom deals making maps

223

that strategically disadvantage one party over the other people start to

224

feel like what does it matter like i i tried

225

and we're doing all these things and we even voted

226

and we we said you know used our voice

227

and it still didn't work confirms that kind of negative feeling people already have

228

that lack of agency benji where did this all land do republicans actually have a structural advantage

229

when it comes to redistricting as we get to November?

230

So this is a very confusing process.

231

It's different from state to state.

232

The court is involved.

233

And in fact, they're still involved right up to this week.

234

Missouri has been trying to eliminate a Democratic seat.

235

It got stopped by a Supreme Court decision, then possibly approved by a different court decision just minutes later.

236

But the Virginia redistricting move that would have favored Democrats was tossed out for procedural reasons.

237

And Republicans are probably going to have an advantage in, let's say, 10 to 12 additional seats by some estimates.

238

Now, what does that mean?

239

It means there are fewer competitive seats overall.

240

And Democrats, depending on your estimate, may need to win the national popular vote by three, four, five points to win a House majority.

241

But Democrats are still favored by many election forecasters to win the House.

242

So why is that?

243

One, Democrats are leading by quite a bit in national polls.

244

It's about six and a half points, according to Nate Silver's latest polling average.

245

Second, Republicans have a very narrow majority.

246

So Democrats don't actually need to net a ton of new seats to win a majority.

247

Third, if Democrats really start hitting the higher end of that polling,

248

even some gerrymandered seats might fall because the way gerrymanders work is that they spread their vote margins across more seats, which makes them easier to win,

249

but also raises the chance of an upset in some of them.

250

So in Texas in particular, there are some Republican concerns that they might not be able to hold on to every seat they plan to gain.

251

Now, this shouldn't make you any less upset about it.

252

It's politicians choosing their own voters now after every election instead

253

of just 10 years to try to pull up the ladder behind them.

254

It goes against the spirit of our democratic system and accountability and representation.

255

But if you're worried the election is canceled, that is not the case.

256

This is a highly competitive race.

257

Your vote does matter.

258

You mentioned the Supreme Court in that answer, and that really leads us to a couple audience questions we got on that front.

259

You know, it seems as if the fear

260

that the Supreme Court could have a big impact on election security is really visceral for some of our audience.

261

Take a listen to a couple of these questions.

262

I want to learn more about whether mail and voting is really being suppressed.

263

I have read about an executive order that outlines all these changes that states are unable to comply to, but yet it's law, but maybe it's going to get blocked.

264

I really have an existential fear that in the end, the Supreme Court might rule that it's okay to suppress vote by mail and the U.S.

265

Postal Service will just not deliver our ballot.

266

And it just feels like this very scary possibility.

267

So how valid do you think the concern is that the Supreme Court might hand Republicans further advantage?

268

So let's start with the basics here.

269

Nobody can just presume any decision is guaranteed by the Supreme Court.

270

It's a very conservative one.

271

They zig sometimes when people thought they were going to zag.

272

However, what Trump is trying to do is still seen as

273

at least a relative long shot in the courts for a few reasons.

274

So Trump has tried this executive order, among other attempts to influence elections, and the Supreme Court is ultimately expected to weigh in.

275

Now, one, we have separation of powers.

276

Generally, federal government, especially the executive branch, is not supposed to be changing election law by executive order.

277

The courts have not looked favorably on prior attempts to mess with elections.

278

A fundamentally state and local driven apparatus is our elections.

279

Yes.

280

And bear in mind, Trump, when he was president, tried to do everything possible to overturn the 2020 election in multiple states.

281

Those went nowhere in federal courts.

282

Those went nowhere in the Supreme Court.

283

So it is worth, you know, they have been willing to buck him in the past on this based on what is pretty well-established precedent.

284

There is also a Supreme Court theory that this particular conservative Supreme Court has cultivated and advanced called the Major Questions Doctrine,

285

which was used most famously to overturn some democratic priorities, like canceling student loans en masse.

286

But it basically says if there is a major change to policy, it should be Congress that is specifically weighing in on it

287

and not some kind of loophole through existing law that the White House uses to try to force it through.

288

So in this case, Congress has not passed some giant mail-in ballot reform bill.

289

In fact, there have been lots of bills discussed that have not been passed related to elections in the last few years.

290

So there's a decent chance even the conservatives might look at this and say, look, if Congress wants to change this, that's their business.

291

But we have a precedent that we have established and safeguarded that this law should, you know, clearly what Trump is trying to do should clearly not pass muster on.

292

But I think people's concern is just the intimidation factor.

293

Also, it feels as if sometimes this administration looks to succeed in policy, but they also just look to push a narrative out there.

294

And we do see Trump using these executive orders to do what he's done consistently, which is just cast doubt on the integrity of the system.

295

Exactly.

296

And the good news is that while that propaganda can be very dangerous in its own right, and it was a massive factor in,

297

you know, most especially the January 6th riot at the Capitol, that is to some degree separate from this legal question of will your votes actually be counted?

298

Will you be able to get in your ballot on time?

299

So it is important to at least separate things.

300

I mean, one way people interpret this sometimes is Trump is pre-spinning a loss.

301

You know, he actually talks often about how presidents usually, you know, their party usually does poorly in the midterms.

302

And I have no doubt if it does go poorly the day after the midterms will say, ah, you know, the Supreme Court and Congress should have gone along with all my election rules.

303

But if I hear you correctly, you're saying the Donald Trump intimidation factor is in one hand,

304

but you think the actual legal question is maybe less certain

305

to fall in his favor as his intimidation kind of bully pulpit methods.

306

Yes.

307

And you should absolutely take the legal side seriously.

308

We're taking it very seriously here.

309

Our reporters are tracking it closely.

310

As I said, nothing's guaranteed, but it is still a very difficult path that so far he has had zero success in.

311

Okay.

312

Let's get to the kind of last point that gave folks real concern.

313

And we've really referenced it already.

314

The president has made constant threats to declare a national emergency ahead of the election or have military of some form, even ICE at the polling locations.

315

And of course there is the ever present fear He'll run 2020 playbook again and seek to invalidate said results.

316

Just listen to some of the concerns that we heard from our listeners.

317

Every day I see something online where the headline is,

318

how is Trump or how is the Republican party going to invalidate the result?

319

I wonder if there is actual real fear,

320

a real possibility that election results could be challenged and tested and what that would really mean for all of us.

321

This is my kind of overwhelming, all-consuming worry.

322

I think it's well-founded, but I hope that it's not.

323

Okay, so how real do we think people should take the threat of Trump declaring a national emergency ahead of the midterm election?

324

So some of this gets into some of the issues we discussed, which is overturning results, seizing ballots, things like that, very difficult.

325

Now, it should be noted because people are mentioning some specific Trumpy threats involving, say, a state of emergency or,

326

you know, the kind of things we saw in Los Angeles or Minneapolis with ICE raids, where you just have lots of federal agents just all over the place

327

or the National Guard in Washington, D.C and other places.

328

Now, there are legal barriers to sending federal agents to polling sites, too.

329

The law prohibits federal troops or armed agents at polling sites unless they're responding to some immediate national security threat.

330

So far, there is no plan to deploy the National Guard or ICE at polling places.

331

It's come up in the news.

332

Trump officials and DHS have been asked about it.

333

And once again, the courts would be the ultimate bulwark against.

334

Now, does that mean you should take everyone's word here?

335

No. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

336

There's always the possibility.

337

Important is that.

338

There's always the possibility, especially in something time limited like an election, that Trump ignores the law.

339

But it's not easy.

340

And also remember, the backlash to such a move could also be greater than the intended effect.

341

You know, a lot of Republicans to this day blame Trump's election denial

342

after 2020 for costing them those two Georgia Senate seats

343

that Democrats now hold in a runoff because it encouraged Black voters in particular, who are very used to threats of disenfranchisement, to turn out like crazy in the runoff.

344

And it also potentially depressed Trump's own supporters because they decided that their votes didn't count.

345

But I wanted to ask, like, we've started this by talking about Donald Trump's deep unpopularity, his increasing unpopularity even among his own base.

346

So that kind of leads me to another question.

347

I mean, Trump has contested every election loss he's been a part of, but he's not on the ballot this November.

348

He's not on the ballot, theoretically, in 2028.

349

So if he does what people are afraid of in terms of declaring a national emergency

350

or trying to bring military personnel to polling places, what do we think the likelihood that the GOP follows him down that path?

351

I mean, are we talking about a party that will follow his election denial to its logical end?

352

So far, elections have been a red line where Republicans, for the most part, have not gone along with these kinds of things.

353

Bear in mind also that if you do something illegal, you can be prosecuted.

354

And in many cases, it's state law that applies, which Trump cannot pardon you for.

355

I would also add that election deniers, like hardcore election deniers, people who really got involved in politics around Trump's election conspiracies,

356

have not won a lot of elections.

357

Yeah.

358

Famously in 2022, even when Democrats were having a rough midterm cycle in many ways,

359

those candidates cost them race after race in governor's races and secretary of state races and Senate races.

360

Now, some of those folks are on the ballot this time.

361

That could change potentially.

362

You might have in future elections, folks who are more aggressively devoted to him.

363

But for the most part, he has not been able to drag the party along on this.

364

Okay.

365

So if I can sum up what I feel like I heard from you, we are acknowledging that the concern or the fear

366

that we're hearing from people around election integrity is certainly valid because of what Donald Trump has said, because of his own history of election denial,

367

and because of the ongoing role the courts have in deciding things around this, like a mail-in ballots, executive order, or even some of these redistricting wars.

368

However, there seems to be a little bit of a logistical problem with the question of like seizing ballots

369

or interfering on election day, partially because of the state and federal separation of powers when it comes to election administration.

370

Yeah.

371

I mean, one way to think of it with a lot of these situations with Trump is

372

that let's say you are in a house and there is a mass serial killer trying to get in through your window.

373

And then he tries to use your doorknob and try to shake the doorknob.

374

And then he tries to get in through the chimney.

375

and the whole time you're saying, well, it's a good thing that I reinforce the windows and

376

that the door is like reinforced steel and that I block the chimney

377

and that I have a ring camera and that I know to let the police in.

378

But you still would be pretty unnerved by this serial killer trying every which way to get into your house, right?

379

I might move, you know?

380

Yes.

381

So I don't want to understate the threat.

382

Obviously, if Trump could snap his fingers and overturn elections, he could.

383

And we know this because he tried to do it explicitly many, many times

384

but it is not easy for him to do.

385

Thank you, Benji, for rounding out our study guide.

386

I think this is important because it really was the number one question people have for us beyond candidates, beyond issues.

387

It's really a concern about the system itself.

388

And so I feel like this type of check-in will go a long way.

389

We appreciate your time.

390

We'll see you soon.

391

See you soon, Asad.

392

America actually will be in your feeds every Saturday with an interesting interview in politics or culture.

393

And you can also listen to America actually wherever you get your podcasts or in the Today Explained feed.

394

The best way to support this show is by becoming a Vox member.

395

Members get a bonus segment on Patreon every week, and we are very grateful for their support.

396

Just go to Vox.com slash members to join.

397

See you all next week, and cue the music.

398

Thank you.

ऐप डाउनलोड करें

धाराप्रवाह बोलने के लिए ज़रूरी सब कुछ

AI उच्चारण स्कोरहर वाक्य का स्कोर

IPA अभ्यासहर ध्वनि में महारत

शब्दावलीअपना शब्द भंडार बनाएँ

शब्द गेमखेलते हुए सीखें

QR स्कैन करें

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

उसी चैनल से

FOR YOU

अनुशंसित वीडियो

198 वाक्य

Trump Is Hot for Tim Scott & Susan Collins Side-Eyes Troy Jackson's Second Cousin | The Daily Show

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

84 वाक्य

Data centres and U.S. midterm elections | Vietnam Today

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

16 वाक्य

PM and Treasurer popularity plummets | 9 News Australia

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

158 वाक्य

🚨Trump WANTS FOX OFF THE AIR after They SHOWED THIS!

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

283 वाक्य

Barack Obama: The 2020 60 Minutes interview

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

146 वाक्य

Trump REVERSES course, tells Republicans to vote by mail now

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

98 वाक्य

Trump’s MAGA Civil War Just EXPLODED On Camera

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

424 वाक्य

Why Latino voters have turned on Trump | America, Actually

Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students

58 वाक्य

AOC vs. MTG on Palestine: the voting records don't lie

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

614 वाक्य

DEM SUPERMAJORITY?: WILD Midterm Scenarios IN PLAY

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

83 वाक्य

How Vladimir Putin won Republicans' approval

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

154 वाक्य

The View Tried to Corner Stephen A. Smith. It Backfired.

Daily ConversationWorking Adults

इस पाठ की शब्दावली और बोलने के सुझाव

यह B2 स्तर का स्पीकिंग पाठ वीडियो “Five things you need to know for the 2026 midterms” पर आधारित है। इस वीडियो में शैडोइंग के लिए 398 वाक्य और 5311 शब्द हैं। बोला गया हिस्सा 30:40 लंबा है। वक्ता लगभग 173 शब्द प्रति मिनट की स्वाभाविक गति से बोलता है, जो रोज़मर्रा की बातचीत के करीब है। 84% शब्द अंग्रेज़ी के 3,000 सबसे आम शब्दों में से हैं; बाकी शब्द अभ्यास से पहले देख लेना अच्छा रहेगा।

इस वीडियो की मुख्य शब्दावली

वीडियो के 15 सबसे कठिन शब्द, उच्चारण और अर्थ के साथ:

शब्द	उच्चारण	अर्थ
voter संज्ञा	/ˈvoʊtɚ/	मतदाता, निर्वाचक
denial संज्ञा	/dɪˈnaɪ.əl/	खंडन
wireless विशेषण	/ˈwaɪ(jə)ɹ.ləs/	बेतार
invalidate क्रिया	/ɪnˈvæl.əˌdeɪt/	निरस्त
runoff संज्ञा		अपवाहित
chimney संज्ञा	/ˈt͡ʃɪmni/	चिमनी, धुआँकश
supporter संज्ञा	/səˈpɔɹ.tɚ/	समर्थक, तरफ़दार
separation संज्ञा	/ˌsɛp.əˈɹeɪ.ʃən/	विच्छेद
rat संज्ञा	/ɹæt/	चूहा, मूश
partially क्रिया विशेषण	/ˈpɑɹʃəli/	आधो-आध
overwhelm क्रिया	/ˌoʊ.vɚˈwɛlm/	अभिभूत
nominee संज्ञा	/ˌnɒmɪˈniː/	नामनिर्देशिती
colleague संज्ञा	/ˈkɒliːɡ/	सहकर्मी, साथी
weigh क्रिया	/weɪ/	तौलना, जोखना
transparent विशेषण	/tɹænsˈpæɹənt/	पारदर्शक, पारदर्शी

वीडियो में आने वाली फ़्रेज़ल वर्ब

शब्द	अर्थ
come back क्रिया	वापस आना

दोहराने लायक वाक्य

वीडियो के छोटे, पूरे वाक्य जिन्हें आप रोज़ की बातचीत में इस्तेमाल कर सकते हैं:

We've already done a lot of reporting this year.
It's like, and I don't see that.
We don't win because he's so bad.
Will you be able to get in your ballot on time?
We're taking it very seriously here.

इस वीडियो का व्याकरण

वक्ता जिन संरचनाओं का सबसे अधिक प्रयोग करता है, वीडियो के असली शब्दों के साथ:

संरचना	वीडियो में
Present perfect continuous have/has been + -ing — पहले शुरू हुआ काम जो अब भी जारी है	he's been acting · has been helping · has been trying
Present perfect have/has + past participle — बीता हुआ काम जिसका असर अभी भी है	We've already done · we've done · have seen
Passive voice be + past participle — ज़ोर इस पर कि क्या होता है, न कि कौन करता है	being suppressed · is driven · being told
Relative clauses who / which + उपवाक्य — व्यक्ति या वस्तु के बारे में अतिरिक्त जानकारी	people who have · woman who came · people who get

ध्यान देने योग्य उच्चारण

वक्ता 51 बार संक्षिप्त रूपों का प्रयोग करता है, जैसे we're, I'm, don't। इन्हें वैसे ही छोटा बोलें जैसा आप सुनते हैं।

“sh” और “zh” की ध्वनियाँ: intimidation /ɪntɪmɪˈdeɪʃən/, congressional /kəŋˈɡɹɛ.ʃə.nəl/, separation /ˌsɛp.əˈɹeɪ.ʃən/, partially /ˈpɑɹʃəli/, structural /ˈstɹʌk(t͡)ʃəɹəl/
लंबे शब्द — बलाघात सही रखें: intimidation /ɪntɪmɪˈdeɪʃən/, congressional /kəŋˈɡɹɛ.ʃə.nəl/, invalidate /ɪnˈvæl.əˌdeɪt/, moratorium /ˌmɔ.ɹəˈtɔ.ɹi.əm/, unpopularity /ˌʌnˌpɒpjʊˈlæɹɪti/

हिंदी भाषियों के लिए मुश्किल ध्वनियाँ:

/v/ और /w/ का फ़र्क़ — /v/ में ऊपर के दाँत निचले होंठ को छूते हैं, /w/ में होंठ गोल होते हैं: voter /ˈvoʊtɚ/, overturn /ˌəʊvə(ɹ)ˈtɜː(ɹ)n/, wireless /ˈwaɪ(jə)ɹ.ləs/, invalidate /ɪnˈvæl.əˌdeɪt/, takeaway /ˈteɪkəweɪ/
/z/ — इसे “ज” (/dʒ/) न बनाएँ: seize /ˈsiːz/, confuse /kənˈfjuːz/, poison /ˈpɔɪ.zən/
शब्द की शुरुआत में s + व्यंजन — पहले “इ” न जोड़ें: stake /steɪk/, structural /ˈstɹʌk(t͡)ʃəɹəl/

इस वीडियो से अभ्यास कैसे करें

पहले बिना बोले पूरा वीडियो एक बार सुनें और जो शब्द नहीं आते उन्हें लिख लें।
0.75× गति से शुरू करें, एक-एक वाक्य की शैडोइंग करें, और सहज लगने पर सामान्य गति पर लौटें।
अपनी आवाज़ रिकॉर्ड करें और मूल से तुलना करें, ख़ासकर voter, denial, wireless जैसे शब्दों पर ध्यान दें।

शैडोइंग तकनीक क्या है?

शैडोइंग (Shadowing) एक विज्ञान-समर्थित भाषा सीखने की तकनीक है जो मूल रूप से पेशेवर दुभाषिया प्रशिक्षण के लिए विकसित की गई थी। विधि सरल लेकिन शक्तिशाली है: आप मूल अंग्रेज़ी ऑडियो सुनते हैं और तुरंत इसे ज़ोर से दोहराते हैं — जैसे वक्ता की छाया 1-2 सेकंड की देरी से। शोध से पता चलता है कि यह उच्चारण सटीकता, स्वर, लय, जुड़ी हुई ध्वनियाँ, सुनने की समझ और बोलने की प्रवाहशीलता में काफ़ी सुधार करता है।

शैडोइंग तकनीक: पूरी चरण-दर-चरण गाइड पढ़ें →

शैडोइंग अभ्यास: Five things you need to know for the 2026 midterms | America, Actually - वीडियो के साथ अंग्रेजी बोलना सीखें

अभ्यास मोड चुनें

ऐप डाउनलोड करें

Why financial literacy education in the US sucks

How cruise ships got so big

Introducing Best of Luck with Kyla Scanlon

Why no aquarium has a great white shark

Inside the secret race to build artificial intelligence | The Gray Area

How to be less neurotic | The Gray Area

We’re already using AI more than we realize

The Ticketmaster monopoly is over, now what?

The biggest peach myth in America

How to solve problems like a designer

The origin of the '80s aesthetic

Why “Buy one, get one free” isn’t a great deal

How F1 drivers survive their own cars

White, pink, and brown noise, explained #shorts

Why 350°F is the magic number for baking

How did pink become a girly color?

Why China's population is shrinking

The real reason Boeing's new plane crashed twice

Why AI art struggles with hands

Why is everything getting so expensive?

Trump Is Hot for Tim Scott & Susan Collins Side-Eyes Troy Jackson's Second Cousin | The Daily Show

Data centres and U.S. midterm elections | Vietnam Today

PM and Treasurer popularity plummets | 9 News Australia

🚨Trump WANTS FOX OFF THE AIR after They SHOWED THIS!

Barack Obama: The 2020 60 Minutes interview

Trump REVERSES course, tells Republicans to vote by mail now

Trump’s MAGA Civil War Just EXPLODED On Camera

Why Latino voters have turned on Trump | America, Actually

AOC vs. MTG on Palestine: the voting records don't lie

DEM SUPERMAJORITY?: WILD Midterm Scenarios IN PLAY

How Vladimir Putin won Republicans' approval

The View Tried to Corner Stephen A. Smith. It Backfired.

इस पाठ की शब्दावली और बोलने के सुझाव

इस वीडियो की मुख्य शब्दावली

वीडियो में आने वाली फ़्रेज़ल वर्ब

दोहराने लायक वाक्य

इस वीडियो का व्याकरण

ध्यान देने योग्य उच्चारण

इस वीडियो से अभ्यास कैसे करें

शैडोइंग तकनीक क्या है?