Shadowing Practice: How High Can Birds Fly? - Learn English Speaking with Video

Les maken...
1
In 1973, an airliner struck a bird called a Rupel's Griffin vulture, which on its own isn't that weird.
2
Planes hit birds pretty regularly during takeoffs and landings.
3
But this collision happened at a cruising height of over 11,000 meters.
4
That's way above the height at which most birds fly.
5
Which makes me wonder, what is the highest a bird can actually fly?
6
Hi, I'm Cameron and this is MinuteEarth.
7
Birds don't tend to fly higher than they absolutely need to, for the same reason you You don't sprint when you could walk.
8
It's difficult and tiring.
9
So we can't necessarily get the answer to this question through observation.
10
I mean, I guess we could drop a bunch of birds out of airplanes and see what happens, but our AdSense revenue definitely isn't going to cover that.
11
Plus, we're not monsters.
12
So let's use our understanding of aerodynamics, scaling laws, and biology to science our way to an approximate answer.
13
There are two things that limit how high a bird can fly.
14
Its ability to stay aloft as the air pressure decreases, and on a much more basic level, its ability to stay alive as the temperature and amount of oxygen decreases.
15
So first, let's figure out which bird could survive at the highest altitude.
16
Oxygen supplies birds the energy they need to stay warm, but at higher altitudes there's less oxygen available and the temperature is much colder,
17
so a bird's ability to survive high up in the air depends on how efficiently they use oxygen
18
and how well they can retain body heat paper measured the oxygen use of a handful of birds and found that, very generally, their overall oxygen use increases with mass.
19
We can then adjust according to other traits, like how much energy their flight muscles require and how much insulation their feathers provide.
20
From all of this, we can calculate the altitude at which each bird should suffer from hypothermia.
21
Let's call this their popsicle point.
22
If we then compile a data set of flying birds and plug their data into these equations, we can see a general pattern emerge.
23
Larger birds can theoretically survive at higher altitudes than smaller birds.
24
There are exceptions, of course, this is biology after all, but our calculations suggest that there are a bunch of birds that could potentially survive above 10,000 meters.
25
And the largest bird in our dataset, the wandering albatross, might be able to survive as high as 17,000 meters.
26
But remember, we also need to figure out if any of these birds could actually stay aloft at such high altitudes.
27
Because the air is less dense the higher you go, less air is available at higher altitudes to push upward against a bird's wings and create that lift.
28
A bird's ability to stay aloft high in the air depends on its weight, size of its wings, and the shape and angle of attack of its wings.
29
That's a factor called the lift coefficient.
30
Combining all of that tells us how much lift a bird's wings should generate in still air at a given altitude.
31
Simple enough at first.
32
But while weights and wingspans and whatnot are easy enough to measure, the wing shapes and angles aren't.
33
Because a bird's wing shape changes as it flies.
34
I'll save you the long explanation of my rationale here, and just say that this is about where I go out on a bit of a limb.
35
The lift coefficient for the birds in our dataset peaks at about 1.5 or so, and that's when they're taking off or about to stall.
36
In other words, when the bird is trying hardest to generate lift.
37
And since staying aloft is likely a struggle at a bird's maximum altitude, this is probably a pretty good estimate of the lift coefficient at this point.
38
From there, we can find the lowest air pressure at which each bird could generate sufficient lift to keep its mass aloft, and then use our friend the barometric equation to convert those
39
numbers to altitudes to estimate the highest point each bird in our dataset should be able to actually maintain flight.
40
Let's call this their lift limit.
41
In general, the smaller birds have the highest lift limits.
42
The hulking Muteswan would struggle to generate lift at a mere 3,800 meters, while the puny Sandmartin should be able to glide at nearly 19,000 meters.
43
Of course, air moves and it's not uniformly dense at given altitudes, so there's definitely some wiggle room here, which will be a surprise tool that's going to help us later.
44
But in any case, a bird with a higher lift limit should be able to fly higher than a bird with a lower one.
45
Now let's combine our lift limit data with our popsicle point data.
46
We can see that lots of birds, like the missile thrush, can theoretically fly super high, but would freeze long before they got there.
47
And then there are a bunch of other birds, like the wandering albatross, that could likely survive at super high altitudes but wouldn't be able to actually maintain flight up there.
48
That leaves us with a small cluster of birds with relatively high popsicle points and high lift limits.
49
Mathematically, these should be the highest flying birds, and for the most part, they're geese.
50
The greylag goose, the bean goose, the Canada goose, and the bar-headed goose should be able to fly as high as 8,000 meters or so,
51
according to our calculations, and this matches up pretty well with what scientists have actually observed.
52
Like during its migration over the highest mountain range on the planet, the bar-headed goose can reach altitudes of over 7,000 meters.
53
Then there's the white stork, which based on its popsicle point and lift limit, is our predicted highest flying bird.
54
It could potentially fly up to about 10,500 meters.
55
In reality, it doesn't fly anywhere near that high.
56
But remember, birds don't necessarily fly as high as they might be physically capable of.
57
But wait, what about the Rupal's griffin?
58
A bird we know for a fact can fly higher than 11,000 meters.
59
Our math suggests that it is lift limited a lot lower than that, about 8200 meters.
60
But this is where theoretical calculations fall short without some additional real-world knowledge.
61
See, the RuPaul's Griffin likes to soar on thermals, warm columns of rising air that can help birds exceed their mathematical lift limit,
62
sometimes even thousands of extra meters up into the air.
63
Other birds are also known to ride thermals, but none of the other high popsicle point birds ride such supercharged thermals, so the Rupples Griffin is likely the bird capable of the highest flight,
64
with the right thermal.
65
It might even reach its very generous popsicle point of 15,000 meters.
66
Turns out, that bird might have had a lot of climbing left to do.
67
You might have noticed that this video is chock full of all sorts of calculations
68
that I basically ripped my hair out trying to make sure I got right.
69
It would have been great if I had a brilliant tutor sitting next to me guiding my learning.
70
Wait, there is a brilliant tutor.
71
If you regularly watch our videos, you're probably aware of the awesome interactive learning platform that is brilliant.
72
Now, Brilliant's lessons are guided by a super intelligent personal tutor for math and coding.
73
You can now learn hard subjects with one-on-one feedback whenever you want to fill the gaps and build your confidence.
74
Click the link below or scan the QR code to get started with Brilliant's tutor for free.
75
You can upgrade to Premium to unlock all courses,
76
and MinuteEarth's viewers can save an additional 20% off an annual subscription at Brilliant.org slash MinuteEarth.
77
Thanks Brilliant!

Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les

Deze video bevat 77 zinnen en 1297 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 6:44. De spreker praat snel, ongeveer 193 woorden per minuut, dus reken op verbonden en ingeslikte klanken. Slechts 79% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden, dus de woordenschat is pittig.

Belangrijke woorden in deze video

15 woorden uit de video die het leren waard zijn, met uitspraak en betekenis:

WoordUitspraakBetekenis
meter zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈmitəɹ/meter, teller
oxygen zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈɑksɪd͡ʒən/zuurstof
goose zelfstandig naamwoord/ɡus/gans
griffin zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈɡɹɪf.ɪn/griffioen
calculation zelfstandig naamwoord/ˌkælkjuˈleɪʃn̩/berekening
tutor zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈtjuːtəː/studiebegeleider, mentor
necessarily bijwoord/ˌnɛs.əˈsɛɹ.ə.li/nodig, noodzakelijk
potentially bijwoord/pəˈtɛnʃ(ə)li/potentieel
angle zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈæŋ.ɡəl/hoek
estimate zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈɛs.tɪ.mət/schatting
biology zelfstandig naamwoord/baɪˈɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/biologie
depend werkwoord/dɪˈpɛnd/afhangen
decrease werkwoord/dɪˈkɹiːs/afnemen, verminderen
mathematics zelfstandig naamwoord/mæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪks/wiskunde, mathematiek
combine werkwoord/kəmˈbaɪn/combineren

Phrasal verbs die je zult horen

WoordBetekenis
figure out werkwoorduitvogelen, er achter komen
take off werkwoorduittrekken, afzetten
turn out werkwoorduitvallen, resulteren

Uitspraak om op te letten

De spreker gebruikt 15 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals don't, isn't, they're. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.

  • De “th”-klanken: mathematics /mæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪks/, mathematical /ˌmæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪ.kəl/, thermal /ˈθɜːməl/, theoretical /ˌθi.əˈɹɛt.ɪ.kəl/, feather /ˈfɛðə/
  • De klanken “sh” en “zh”: calculation /ˌkælkjuˈleɪʃn̩/, potentially /pəˈtɛnʃ(ə)li/, equation /ɪˈkweɪ.ʒən/, explanation /ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən/, exception /əkˈsɛpʃən/
  • Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: necessarily /ˌnɛs.əˈsɛɹ.ə.li/, potentially /pəˈtɛnʃ(ə)li/, biology /baɪˈɑ.lə.d͡ʒi/, mathematics /mæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪks/, explanation /ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən/

Zo oefen je met deze video

  1. Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
  2. Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
  3. Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als meter, oxygen, goose.

Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?

Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.

Shadowing-techniek: lees de volledige stap-voor-stap-gids →