Практика Shadowing: Oppenheimer Wrote One Letter About Feynman — It Changed His Life - Изучайте разговорный английский по видео

Выберите режим практики

Каждый режим открывает полноэкранную комнату практики.

245 предложений

Если предложения слишком короткие или длинные, нажмите Edit, чтобы их изменить.

In November 1943, the man in charge of building the atomic bomb stopped to write a job reference.

Not to a general, not to Washington.

He was running

Los Alamos, thousands of people, a secret city, built from scratch in the New Mexico desert.

The most important and most tightly classified scientific project in the history of the world.

And in the middle of that, he took the time to sit down and write to a university physics department about a job.

The man he was recommending was 25 years old and had published almost nothing the outside world would recognize.

The letter still exists.

One line from it has been quoted ever since.

And the people it was sent to did nothing about it.

The man writing was Robert Oppenheimer.

The letter went to Raymond Burge, the chairman of the physics department at the University of California, Berkeley.

Oppenheimer's own old department, the place where he had taught before the war, pulled him out to the desert.

And the young man he was writing about was Richard Feynman.

To understand why that letter is strange, you have to understand who Feynman actually was at that point,

because it was not much of anything the public could see.

He had finished his doctorate at Princeton the year before, in 1942.

He was good.

His teachers knew he was good.

But he was a fresh

Ph .D., one of thousands of capable young physicists in the country,

with no great discovery to his name and no reputation outside the small rooms where theoretical physicists argue with each other.

Early in 1943, he was pulled out to Los Alamos while the laboratory was still half -built,

roads unpaved, buildings going up around the scientists as they worked.

He was put into the theoretical division, the group doing the hardest mathematics on the project, and that division was run by Hans Bethe.

And this is where something happened that doesn't usually happen to a 25 -year -old.

Beto was one of the senior men in physics.

He would later win the Nobel Prize for working out how the sun produces its energy.

At Los Alamos, he needed people who could tear an idea apart

and find the flaw in it before the project spent six months chasing it.

He started talking through problems with Feynman, and he found that this young man would argue back,

would stand in his office and tell him he was wrong, loudly, and then turn out to be right often enough that

Beta kept coming back for more.

The two of them worked out a method together for calculating how powerful a fission bomb would be,

a piece of work that still carries both their names.

Feynman was handed a group of his own to run.

By one account, he became the youngest group leader in the entire laboratory.

He was also, on the side, picking the locks on the filing cabinets where the most secret documents in the country were kept,

not to steal anything, but to prove the locks were useless

and to irritate the officers who were sure the secrets were safe.

That was the person Oppenheimer was writing about.

Not a famous man, a 25 -year -old who argued with Nobel laureates and cracked government safes for sport,

and whom the most senior people in the building had quietly decided was the best of all of them.

So the letter was not a routine favor.

It was the director of the Manhattan Project telling another institution, this one is worth your attention, and you should move before someone else does.

Recommendation letters are usually careful things.

You praise the candidate, you hedge a little, you leave yourself some room.

Oppenheimer did not hedge.

He wrote that Feynman was, in his words, by all odds the most brilliant young physicist there, and that everyone knew it.

That last part is the tell.

He wasn't offering an opinion for Burge to weigh against other opinions.

He was reporting something the whole laboratory already agreed on, and telling Burge he was behind the curve.

He even reminded Burge, in the letter, that he might already know the name, because Feynman had once applied for a fellowship at Berkeley.

So Berkeley had crossed paths with him once before.

Then Oppenheimer did something you almost never see in a letter like this.

He didn't rest on his own word.

He handed Burge two quotes from other men, and these were not ordinary men.

The first was Betta, the same Betta who ran the theoretical division, who had Feynman working directly under him.

Betta said he would rather lose any two other men from the project than lose Feynman.

Sit with what that means.

This was wartime, on a project where every single person had been handpicked from the best in the country, where losing anyone set the work back.

Betta was saying, take two of my people, any two, before you take this one.

The second quote was from Eugene Wigner.

Another future Nobel laureate, one of the deepest and most precise thinkers in the field.

Wigner said that Feynman was a second Dirac, only this time human.

You have to know who Dirac was for that line to do its work.

Paul Dirac was one of the strangest and most brilliant physicists who ever lived.

He had written down an equation and.. from the mathematics alone, predicted that antimatter must exist,

a mirror version of ordinary matter that nobody had ever seen.

And then, a few years later, they found it, exactly as the equation said.

That is almost the purest thing a physicist can do.

He was also famous for being nearly impossible to talk to.

He spoke so rarely, and so literally, that other physicists collected stories about him for decades.

Dirac was the benchmark.

He was the name you reached for when ordinary words for genius had run out, and Wigner was saying, Feynman belonged in that company,

the same order of mind, except that you could actually have a conversation with him.

So this is what sat on Raymond Burge's desk in the winter of 1943.

The director of the Manhattan Project, the head of its theoretical division, and one of the great minds of the age, all independently, all in writing,

all pointing at the same 25 -year -old and saying the same thing, above nearly everyone, before the world had the faintest idea who he was.

What those three men had wasn't a crystal ball.

It was a way of testing whether something in front of them actually held up, quickly, and without being fooled by a reputation or a title.

I put the six questions Feynman used to do exactly that, taken from his own lectures and his own writing,

into a short guide called The Feynman Field Guide to Clear Thinking.

Linked below.

Burge read the letter.

And Berkeley did nothing.

Not right away.

Not slowly.

Not eventually.

The recommendation went nowhere.

The most valuable endorsement in American physics landed on a department chairman's desk, and the chairman let it sit there.

Why?

For a long time, that was the quiet, unexplained part of the story.

The physicist and writer Jeremy Bernstein, going back through the record years later, found that Oppenheimer had tried as early as 1943 to get

Berkeley to bring Feynman in, and that the move was opposed by Burge.

For some reason, is how Bernstein put it, the reason wasn't written down.

What the record does show is that relations between Berg and Oppenheimer were strained, and that the chairman simply would not act.

You can let a thing like that stay a mystery.

Or you can look at who Raymond Burge was, and at another decision he made, which is not a mystery, because he explained it himself.

100

A few years earlier, Oppenheimer had tried to bring a different man into the Berkeley department,

101

Robert Serber, one of his own most gifted students and closest collaborators.

102

Serber was Jewish.

103

Burge blocked it, and in a letter to a colleague explaining himself, he wrote that one

104

Jew in the department was enough.

105

That is not an interpretation.

106

That is what he wrote, and it sits in the histories and on the historical marker at Oppenheimer's old

107

Berkeley building to this day.

108

Feynman was Jewish too.

109

I want to be careful here, because this channel does not do your thinking for you.

110

Nobody wrote down Berger's reason for sitting on the Feynman letter.

111

The line about one

112

Jew being enough was about Serber, not about Feynman, and it would be dishonest to pretend otherwise.

113

What I can give you is the two facts set down side by side, the way they sat on that desk.

114

Oppenheimer sent Berkeley the strongest recommendation of his career.

115

The man who received it had already, in his own hand, decided that a department could hold too many of a certain kind of person.

116

And he did nothing with the letter in front of him.

117

You have probably watched a version of this.

118

Not this exact one, but the shape of it.

119

Someone with the title, the final say, the name on the door, getting a judgment badly wrong,

120

while the people actually doing the work could see it plainly and had no power to move it.

121

If you have sat through that, I would like to hear about it.

122

What was the job and who was your Burge?

123

Here is where you might think you have the point of the story.

124

A small, blinkered administrator misses a great talent out of prejudice or pride.

125

A cautionary tale with a clear villain.

126

That is part of it, but if you stop there, you have only half, because you would still be assuming the letter mattered,

127

that if only Burge had acted on it, he would have handed Feynman his future, and the tragedy is that he dropped it.

128

That has it backwards.

129

The letter did not change Feynman's life, and that is the thing the title quietly takes away, even as it promises it.

130

Because Feynman was fine, more than fine.

131

While Berkeley sat on its hands, Hans Bethe, the same Bethe who said he would rather lose any two other men,

132

simply decided that he wanted Feynman near him when the war was over.

133

Bethe was a professor at Cornell.

134

Cornell had taken him in as a refugee from Germany in 1935, and he stayed loyal to the place for the rest of his life.

135

When the fighting ended, Bethe and his colleagues brought Feynman to Cornell and Feynman went gladly

136

because he admired Batha and wanted to keep working beside him.

137

There was a harder reason, too.

138

Feynman's wife, Arlene, had tuberculosis.

139

Through the Los Alamos years, she lived in a sanatorium a few hours away, and he drove out to see her when he could.

140

She died in June of 1945, weeks before the first bomb was tested.

141

When the war ended, he was a widower at 27, and what he wanted was not an institution bidding for him.

142

He wanted to work next to a man he trusted.

143

Beta was that man.

144

By his own account, he had settled on Cornell before any competing offer could catch up.

145

So the Berkeley recommendation was never the hinge it appears to be.

146

It did not open a door, because the door that mattered was opened by a man who wanted Feynman personally

147

and did not need a letter to tell him so.

148

Oppenheimer's recommendation got Feynman nothing.

149

Berkeley simply missed him, and that is exactly what makes the letter worth keeping.

150

Not because it worked, but because it didn't, and it still turned out to be true in every line.

151

Read it again with that in mind.

152

Everything Oppenheimer wrote in 1943 was correct.

153

The most brilliant, by all odds, and everyone knew it.

154

Correct.

155

A second Dirac, only human.

156

Correct.

157

And if anything, an understatement.

158

In the years after the war, at Cornell, Feynman built a new way of handling the behavior of light and matter,

159

of electrons and photons that had defeated everyone who came before him, including a way of drawing those interactions as simple pictures,

160

lines, and squiggles on paper that physicists still use at the blackboard today.

161

But here is a scene worth stopping on, because it says something the rest of the story doesn't.

162

In the spring of 1948, 27 physicists gathered at a resort hotel in the Pocono Mountains

163

of Pennsylvania at a meeting the National Academy of Sciences had called.

164

It was not a public event.

165

It was the inner circle of the field, in one room.

166

Enrico Fermi was there.

167

Niels Bohr was there, the man who had built the foundations of quantum theory.

168

And Paul Dirac was there, the actual Dirac, the benchmark himself, the man Feynman had been measured against five years earlier,

169

in a letter he never saw, sitting in the audience.

170

Feynman got up and, for the first time in public, showed them his pictures and his method, and the room could not follow him.

171

His approach had antimatter behaving like ordinary matter running backward through time,

172

and it got the right answers by physical reasoning rather than by proving each step the way the others expected.

173

Bohr thought the young man had forgotten something basic about quantum mechanics, and rose from his seat to correct him at the blackboard.

174

Dirac kept pressing him on whether the method was even mathematically consistent, a question Feynman, who trusted it because it worked,

175

could not answer to Dirac's satisfaction.

176

Edward Teller raised an objection too.

177

One by one, the founders of modern physics told him, in effect, that they did not see it.

178

They admitted his answers were correct.

179

They just could not accept how he was getting them.

180

Feynman left the conference disappointed, by some accounts depressed, and went home to write the whole thing up properly instead.

181

Hold that against the Burge story for a moment, because they are not the same failure, and the difference matters.

182

At Pocono, the greatest physicists alive were wrestling in good faith with something genuinely new and genuinely hard,

183

presented badly, late in a long day.

184

Skepticism in that room was not a sin, it is how science is supposed to work.

185

Within a few years, helped by a young mathematician named Freeman Dyson, who made the method legible to everyone else, the pictures Feynman drew that night,

186

became the standard tool of the entire field.

187

Even Oppenheimer, who had chaired the discussions, came around and conceded the point.

188

The system corrected itself, because the people in it were trying to see.

189

Burge was not trying to see.

190

That is the whole distinction.

191

He had nothing hard in front of him, no five -hour lecture, no half -finished theory.

192

He had a clean, plain, one -page conclusion handed to him in writing by the three men in the country,

193

best place to reach it, and he did nothing.

194

The difference between Pocono and Berkeley is the difference between failing to understand a thing and refusing to look at it,

195

which is why the 1943 letter is more remarkable, not less.

196

In 1948, with the work in front of them, the founders of physics could not see what Feynman had.

197

In 1943, with no work to look at, no diagrams, no

198

Nobel, nothing but a young man arguing in a half -built laboratory.

199

Oppenheimer and Beitha and Wigner saw all of it.

200

They were years ahead of a room that contained Bohr and Dirac.

201

And the one man who had their conclusion in his hand, in plain language, filed it away.

202

So reckon up what actually happened.

203

Feynman went on to share the Nobel Prize in 1965 for that work at Cornell.

204

He moved to Caltech and rebuilt how physics was taught to a whole generation.

205

And decades later, an old man by then, a television audience of millions,

206

watched him sit at a government hearing into the loss of a space shuttle, take a clamped piece of the shuttle's own rubber sealing material,

207

drop it into a glass of ice water, and show on camera that the cold had made it stiff.

208

The single physical fact that explained why seven people had died.

209

The same mind, still cutting straight to the thing that mattered, more than 40 years after the letter.

210

All of it was visible in 1943.

211

It was written down.

212

It was signed by the three men best placed in the country to judge it.

213

And it sat in a drawer at Berkeley

214

while the man it described went off and did every single thing the letter said he would.

215

We tend to assume that recognition is the hard part, that genius goes unseen, that the tragedy is nobody noticing in time.

216

Feynman's story says something stranger.

217

He was seen, completely, early, in writing, by precisely the right people.

218

The recognition was flawless.

219

The failure came one step later, at the desk of the man whose only job, in that moment, was to act on it.

220

And those are two different things, being right and holding the authority to decide.

221

Burge had the authority.

222

He was the chairman.

223

A little over a decade later, he would be elected president of the American Physical Society.

224

The most senior post -American physics could hand a man, and the university would eventually carve his name over the door of a building.

225

Beethy and Wigner and Oppenheimer had the judgment.

226

When those two things point in opposite directions, it is not always the judgment that wins.

227

It is often the title, because the title is the one holding the pen.

228

Feynman spent the rest of his life worrying at that exact gap.

229

He had no patience for authority that could not show its work,

230

not out of rebellion, but because he refused to grant anyone the benefit of the doubt on the strength of their rank.

231

A grand title, a confident manner, a committee stamp, none of it counted with him until he had checked the thing himself.

232

You can read that as a personality quirk, or as a man who understood,

233

better than most, how easily a correct answer dies on the desk of someone who outranks the people who are right.

234

The letter is still here.

235

You can find it reproduced in the biographies,

236

quoted in articles, pulled out whenever someone wants to show how clearly the great physicists saw what was coming.

237

It outlived every man who touched it.

238

It outlived the decision it was written to change.

239

At the University of California, Berkeley, there is a physics building.

240

It was dedicated in 1964, and it carries a name above the door.

241

The name is Burge Hall.

242

It is named for Raymond Burge, the chairman, in honor of his long service to the department.

243

Richard Feynman never worked at Berkeley.

244

He went to Cornell and then to Caltech, and the letter that recommended him to Berkeley is still in the archive, the most brilliant young physicist,

245

by all odds, and everyone knew it, sitting exactly where the man who received it set it down.

Скачать приложение

Всё для свободной речи

ИИ-оценка произношенияОценка каждой фразы

Практика IPAОсвойте каждый звук

СловарьСоберите свой словарный запас

Игра со словамиУчитесь играя

Сканировать QR

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

Тот же канал

Feynman’s 15-Minute Trick That Makes Your Brain Absorb Any Language Instantly

Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students

Force Your Brain to Think Like a Genius | Richard Feynman

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

FOR YOU

Лексика и советы по произношению к этому уроку

Этот урок разговорной практики построен на видео «Oppenheimer Wrote One Letter About Feynman — It Changed His Life». Чаще всего повторяются слова: Feynman, letter, Burge, Berkeley. В этом видео 245 предложений и 3192 слов для шедоуинга. Речь длится 17:55. Говорящий говорит в естественном темпе, около 178 слов в минуту, близком к повседневной речи. 82% слов входят в 3000 самых частых слов английского языка; остальные стоит разобрать перед занятием.

Ключевая лексика этого видео

15 слов из видео, которые стоит выучить, с произношением и значением:

Слово	Произношение	Значение
physics существительное	/ˈfɪz.ɪks/	фи́зика
desk существительное	/dɛsk/	пи́сьменный стол, стол
recommendation существительное	/ˌɹɛkəmɛnˈdeɪʃən/	рекоменда́ция
argue глагол	/ˈɑɹ.ɡju/	спо́рить, обсужда́ть
ordinary прилагательное	/ˈɔɹdɪnɛɹi/	обыкнове́нный, обы́чный
laboratory существительное	/ˈlæb(ə)ɹəˌtɔɹi/	лаборато́рия
theoretical прилагательное	/ˌθi.əˈɹɛt.ɪ.kəl/	теорети́ческий, академи́чный
odd прилагательное	/ɑd/	стра́нный
judgment существительное	/ˈd͡ʒʌd͡ʒ.mənt/	осужде́ние, сужде́ние
recognition существительное	/ˌɹɛkəɡˈnɪʃ(ə)n/	узнава́ние, распознава́ние
reputation существительное	/ˌɹɛpjʊˈteɪʃən/	репута́ция, про́филь
founder существительное	/ˈfaʊ̯n.dəː/	основа́тель, основа́тельница
mystery существительное	/ˈmɪs.t(ə.)ɹi/	та́йна, зага́дка
badly наречие	/ˈbæd.li/	пло́хо, нехорошо́
plain существительное	/pleɪn/	равни́на

Фразовые глаголы, которые вы услышите

Слово	Произношение	Значение
write down глагол		запи́сывать, записа́ть
work out глагол	/ˌwɝk ˈaʊt/	рассчи́тывать, рассчита́ть
come around глагол	/kʌ.məˈɹaʊnd/	переду́мать
get up глагол		поднима́ться, подня́ться
go back глагол		возвраща́ться, возврати́ться
go off глагол		взрыва́ться, взорва́ться
go up глагол		поднима́ться, подня́ться
hold up глагол		задерживать, ждать

Грамматика в этом видео

Конструкции, которые говорящий использует чаще всего, с точными словами из видео:

Конструкция	В видео
Пассивный залог be + причастие прошедшего времени — важно, что происходит, а не кто это делает	has been quoted · was sent · was pulled
Придаточные определительные who / which + предложение — уточнение о человеке или предмете	people who could · made, which is · man who received
Present Perfect have/has + причастие прошедшего времени — прошлое действие, важное сейчас	has been quoted · have probably watched · have sat

Произношение, на которое стоит обратить внимание

Говорящий использует 7 сокращённых и редуцированных форм, например wasn't, didn't, doesn't. Произносите их коротко, так, как слышите.

Звуки «th»: theoretical /ˌθi.əˈɹɛt.ɪ.kəl/, mathematics /mæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪks/, gather /ˈɡæðɚ/, mathematician /ˌmæθ.(ə.)məˈtɪʃ.ən/
Звуки «sh» и «zh»: recommendation /ˌɹɛkəmɛnˈdeɪʃən/, recognition /ˌɹɛkəɡˈnɪʃ(ə)n/, reputation /ˌɹɛpjʊˈteɪʃən/, institution /ˌɪn.stɪˈtʃuː.ʃən/, conclusion /kənˈkluːʒən/
Длинные слова — следите за ударением: recommendation /ˌɹɛkəmɛnˈdeɪʃən/, ordinary /ˈɔɹdɪnɛɹi/, laboratory /ˈlæb(ə)ɹəˌtɔɹi/, theoretical /ˌθi.əˈɹɛt.ɪ.kəl/, recognition /ˌɹɛkəɡˈnɪʃ(ə)n/

Звуки, трудные для русскоязычных:

/w/ — губы округлены, это не /v/: quietly /ˈkwaɪ.ɪt.li/, quantum /ˈkwɑntəm/, equation /ɪˈkweɪ.ʒən/, backward /ˈbækwɚd/, nowhere /ˈnoʊ.(h)wɛɹ/
/h/ — лёгкий выдох, а не русское «х»: hedge /ˈhɛd͡ʒ/, nowhere /ˈnoʊ.(h)wɛɹ/, behave /bɪˈheɪv/
Звонкие согласные в конце слова — не оглушайте их: odd /ɑd/, colleague /ˈkɒliːɡ/, hedge /ˈhɛd͡ʒ/, backward /ˈbækwɚd/, disappointed /ˌdɪsəˈpɔɪnɪd/

Как заниматься с этим видео

Прослушайте всё видео один раз молча и выпишите незнакомые слова.
Начните со скорости 0,75×, повторяйте предложение за предложением и вернитесь к обычной скорости, когда станет легко.
Запишите себя и сравните с оригиналом, обращая внимание на такие слова, как physics, desk, recommendation.

Что такое техника Shadowing?

Shadowing — это научно обоснованная техника изучения языка, изначально разработанная для подготовки профессиональных переводчиков и популяризированная полиглотом доктором Александром Аргуэльесом. Метод прост, но эффективен: вы слушаете аудио на английском от носителей языка и немедленно повторяете вслух — как тень, следующая за говорящим с задержкой в 1–2 секунды. В отличие от пассивного прослушивания или грамматических упражнений, Shadowing заставляет мозг и мышцы рта одновременно обрабатывать и воспроизводить реальные речевые паттерны. Исследования показывают, что это значительно улучшает точность произношения, интонацию, ритм, связную речь, понимание на слух и беглость речи — что делает его одним из самых эффективных методов для подготовки к IELTS Speaking и реального общения на английском.

Техника шедоуинга: читать полное пошаговое руководство →

Практика Shadowing: Oppenheimer Wrote One Letter About Feynman — It Changed His Life - Изучайте разговорный английский по видео

Выберите режим практики

Скачать приложение

Тот же канал

Feynman’s 15-Minute Trick That Makes Your Brain Absorb Any Language Instantly

Force Your Brain to Think Like a Genius | Richard Feynman

Рекомендуемое видео

Why is there antimatter?

View From The Top with Roelof Botha, Managing Partner of Sequoia Capital

The Feynman Technique Actually Works But You're Doing It Wrong

OpenAI’s lead engineer was secretly a spy...

Stephen Hawking - Ông hoàng vật lý và... một người chồng tệ? | Viết Cùng Tiểu Hy | Thế Giới

Heidegger’s Forgotten Lectures to Psychiatrists

"Focusing is about saying no" - Steve Jobs (WWDC'97)

This 1 Book Has Produced More Geniuses Than Any University in History

My Joe Rogan Appearance: What I Learned (ft. Young Jamie & Viktor Hovland)

The Terrible Paradox of Self-Awareness | Fernando Pessoa

The Professor Who Taught People How To Think (1962)

Letter 2 The 38 letters from J.D Rockefeller to his son