ฝึกพูดภาษาอังกฤษด้วยเทคนิค Shadowing จากวิดีโอ: our conception of love is messed up.

เลือกโหมดฝึก

แต่ละโหมดจะเปิดห้องฝึกแบบเต็มจอ

290 ประโยค

หากประโยคสั้นหรือยาวเกินไป กดที่ Edit เพื่อปรับแก้

This video is sponsored by Wren. Is love an art?

Then it requires knowledge and effort.

Or is love a pleasant sensation, which to experience is a matter of chance, something one falls into if one is lucky?

This little book is based on the former premise, while undoubtedly the majority of people today believe in the latter.

Not that people think that love is not important.

They are starved for it.

They watch endless numbers of films and happy and unhappy love stories.

They listen to hundreds of trashy songs about love.

Yet hardly anyone thinks that there's anything that needs to be learned about love.

Scrolling through posts about romantic relationships nowadays, I kind of hate it.

Not because I'm a cynic or I find PDA to be cringey.

In fact, I love love.

I think it should be central to the way we live our lives.

But there are several beliefs about romantic relationships that I see commonly floating around on the internet that bug me.

There's the if-he-wanted-to-he-would group, the never-settle advocates, the constant talk about red flags and standards,

and letting random strangers on TikTok make you question your healthy relationship.

You don't find that suspicious?

As a preface, I'll probably talk more so about things I see and hear from straight women, since that's what I identify as.

But the fundamental concepts that I talk about for love do apply to all romantic relationships, regardless of gender or sexuality.

Before I get to specific content I see online, let's talk about two broader questions.

Is love passive or active?

In other words, is love a state that exists independently and is waiting for us to fall into?

Or does it require our participation and effort to bring about?

2. Is our conception of love grounded in anything real?

Or are we comparing our relationships to hyper-real love?

Now we can't love if we're all dead from climate change, right?

Smooth segue into a sponsorship, I know.

Well, I'm here to briefly talk about Wren.

Wren is a website where you can take a short quiz to calculate your carbon footprint and find ways to reduce it.

They have multiple carbon reduction projects that you can help fund, such as tree planting, mineral weathering, and rainforest protection.

Once you sign up to make a monthly contribution to offset your carbon footprint, you receive monthly updates about the projects you support.

You get to see what your money is spent on, with photos and details of every tree planted, every acre reforested, and every ton of carbon offset.

Check out the link in the description box for more info.

The first 100 people who sign up using my link will have 10 extra trees planted in their name.

Thank you again, Ren, for sponsoring this video.

Okay, so first, is love passive or active.

Based on the quote I recited at the beginning of the video, you can probably guess that I believe love is active.

And I want to be clear, a lot of the things

that I will be saying in this section of the video can be found in Eric Fromm's The Art of Loving.

It was written in 1956, so obviously some of the things are outdated, but I still feel as though a lot of it is applicable to present day.

See, Fromm notices that most people view love through a passive lens.

Love is somehow out there waiting for us to stumble upon.

You hear phrases such as, true love comes to those who wait.

Do not chase love, it will just find you when the time is right.

And so people focus on making themselves as lovable as possible rather than loving.

Fromm likens dating to modern capitalism.

Modern capitalism works on the premise of mutually beneficial exchange.

I buy your product and you get my money.

To participate in the dating world is to place yourself in what Fromm calls the personality market.

You try to make yourself as lovable as possible, which is really dependent on the time period and culture.

For a long time, the dream man was ambitious, physically strong, a protector.

But now there's a lot more demand for men who crochet and will cry into our shoulders.

A lot of people also try to make themselves lovable for certain types of people.

For example, if person one wants a goth titty GF and person two wants a computer science boy,

they're probably going to dress differently and get well versed in different talking points.

But by then, they've already become selective about which market they're putting themselves out onto do,

they are already deciding what kind of love should come their way.

And so really, love becomes what will satisfy your desire to not be lonely.

Fromm compares this self-interested search for a partner to a bargain, because you can almost think of it like a graph.

You have fallen in love when you find the optimal sweet spot between social value and desire for you.

This strategical exchange doesn't really treat people as people.

Instead, we become commodities on this personality market, and we're all trying to increase our market value by adhering to what others want.

I know a lot of straight women are happy

and think it's quite progressive that more straight men are moving from an alpha gym bro lifestyle to adopting more nerdy,

soft, or feminine traits.

many comments being like, oh men are finally listening to what women want.

And don't get me wrong, I definitely prefer the latter type of men as well.

But should we really be happy about this?

Like the men are just adhering to changing social values, to be more desirable on this personality market.

But is a man who is traditionally masculine necessarily a worse lover than a man written by a woman?

Instead of congratulating people for becoming a better commodity to soothe our awareness of our existential loneliness,

why do we not focus on loving itself?

This is what I mean by passive versus active conceptions of love.

Someone who thinks of love passively asks, how do I become loved?

Someone who thinks of love actively asks, how do I love?

When relationships end, people tend to focus on how to improve their lovability by working out, getting their hair done, buying new clothes,

advancing their career, as exemplified by post-breakup glow-up videos on YouTube.

I'm gonna have a post-breakup glow-up, basically just doing my hair and makeup.

So we're gonna get my hair dyed, we're gonna self-tan, we're gonna whiten my teeth, we're gonna do a face mask, exfoliate, wax my eyebrows, wax my upper lip, shades, do a full face of makeup,

hopefully put extensions in, get my nails done, get my toes done.

We're gonna do the most.

And yes, I know people often claim that these transformations are for self-love and not others,

but I'm highly suspicious of how changing so much of your physical appearance is self-love.

Sure, you will feel more confident, but it's because you now feel more desirable to others.

We're always so concerned with being loved.

I know it's a popular joke for people to comment things like, throwing myself off of the Empire State Building,

or eating glass for breakfast under happy couple posts.

And it's funny, okay, don't get me wrong, but it's funny because we feel that there is a level of truth to it.

Seeing other people in happy relationships prompts us to feel sad or slightly jealous that we are not being loved enough.

Rarely do they ever make us think about how we can improve as a lover

and maybe help bring that kind of love into our lives.

We seem to take our concept of love itself for granted.

Most people assume that love is just intuitively known and it does not need to be learned.

Everyone will just naturally know what it is.

But this stems from the problem of treating love as an object, a noun, a feeling, something that just happens to us.

Fromm and also bell hooks, rest in peace queen, say we need to shift our perspective and understand love as an activity.

Fromm actually calls love an art and just like being good at any art such as playing an instrument,

dancing, painting, it requires constant practice, dedication, and faith.

100

Just as how you can't be a good piano player by only playing when you feel like it,

101

you can't be good at love if you only choose to love when it is convenient and enjoyable for you.

102

Fromm also says that an art requires faith.

103

When you practice an art and you run into a difficult skill, rather than give up because it's hard,

104

you have to have faith in eventually succeeding and dedicate effort to that art until you succeed.

105

The same is with love.

106

I'll get more into this later on with the overuse of the term red flags,

107

but I feel like people start to doubt their whole relationship just because they saw one random person on TikTok say something.

108

Of course, if there's constant cheating, lying, abuse, etc. These are clear signs to leave.

109

Wiring our brains to think about love as something active rather

110

than passive is actually really helpful in separating love from abuse and dishonesty.

111

I want to read a passage from Bell Hook's All About Love that I really like.

112

To begin by always thinking of love as an action rather than a feeling is one way in

113

which anyone using the word in this manner automatically assumes accountability and responsibility.

114

We are often taught we have no control over our feelings.

115

Yet most of us accept that we choose our actions, that intention and will inform what we do.

116

We also accept that our actions have consequences.

117

To think of actions shaping feelings is one way we rid ourselves of conventionally accepted assumptions, such as that one simply falls in love,

118

without exercising will or choice, that there are such things as crimes of passion, i.e. he killed her because he loved her so much.

119

If we were constantly remembering that love is as love does, we would not use the word in a manner that devalues and degrades its meaning.

120

I think that most importantly, when you work on an art, creating a wonderful result is what leaves you with fulfillment, right?

121

For instance, by finishing a beautiful painting, an artist bestows meaning upon their life because the painting, as a product of the artist's efforts,

122

reflects their incredible abilities back onto themselves.

123

The artist realizes that they are the reason why this canvas is so beautiful.

124

Thus, love is to nurture the flourishing of someone else, and you recognize your own worth through their flourishing.

125

If we treat love as an active art rather than a thing, love is about giving rather than receiving.

126

A lot of people think that giving equals sacrifice, and that's why it's so honorable to do it.

127

But Fromm says that giving does not have to require us sacrificing anything.

128

When done for the sake of giving and not some other goal.

129

Giving is actually the best way to combat our existential loneliness.

130

When you give, you experience your own strength, energy, and aliveness.

131

This is true when you give anything, such as giving money or giving food to your children, but this is especially true in giving love.

132

Because when you give love, you give all the things that make up you.

133

Your interests, your emotions, your passions, your knowledge.

134

Quote, he enhances the other's sense of aliveness by enhancing his own sense of aliveness.

135

Sadly, in heterosexual relationships, I still think this idea of the man being the giver

136

and the woman being the receiver is present.

137

And a lot of women happily endorse this idea because it's nice and easy to be the receiver.

138

My man should ask me to be his Valentine.

139

He should be giving me flowers.

140

My man should be doing this and that for me.

141

I see this sentiment get worse because of social media portraying perfect images of people's boyfriends.

142

You know, the ones where a girl shows off all the sweet things her boyfriend does for her, and the comments are filled with stuff like, my standards just got higher,

143

why doesn't my boyfriend do this for me?

144

If he wanted to, he would.

145

Again, the dominant narrative here is that love equals being loved, which equals getting stuff.

146

Of course, it feels nice to receive things, and it's important to have a lover that gives things as symbols of love.

147

But ladies, Because basing love on what you receive makes love a passive commodity.

148

You gotta focus on love as an action and give back.

149

And giving love is not about giving material objects.

150

It's about giving you as a person.

151

Sharing your thoughts, your humor, your joy, and your sadness.

152

That's what giving love is.

153

One of the most loving couples I've come across are Hannah and Shane.

154

They talk about how so many people pity Hannah as some poor sacrificial giver

155

because they think she just gives without receiving things we typically associate with love back, such as traditional forms of pleasure.

156

One time, a woman who asked if I was Shane's cousin.

157

Yeah.

158

And he said, no, this is my girlfriend.

159

And she came up to me and took my hands and began to cry and was like, that's the most beautiful thing I've ever heard.

160

Like, you're an angel.

161

which was super uncomfortable because that insinuates that I'm an angel because Shane is a terrible choice.

162

People wonder why Hannah, who has high social value as a pretty woman, would partake in this unfair exchange.

163

It goes back to this dominant idea of love being finding the best bargain on the market.

164

But Shane and Hannah don't care about this dominant conception of love they love each other

165

because they give their personhood to each other, and they love the person they each are, without primarily focused on what's in it for them.

166

At this point, maybe you're like, okay, Olivia, good job on becoming the most idealistic lover girl with zero connection to reality.

167

As romantic as giving for the sake of giving sounds, without care about receiving material gifts.

168

We all want to feel loved.

169

Doing the loving is so much effort, and I'm too insecure to not crave being loved.

170

Plus, you can't just erase the value that material gifts have in our capitalist culture.

171

And to all that I say, you are right.

172

You are 100% right.

173

You got me.

174

Which is why proper loving is counter-culture.

175

It's near impossible because it's so opposed to how current culture is?

176

How can I focus on giving when I'm surrounded by people on social media showing off what they receive?

177

When our culture is so based on consumerism, on who has what?

178

And obviously, I'm going to be obsessed with increasing my social value when that's how I'm constantly judged.

179

How can I dedicate that much time to practicing love as an art

180

when society tells me there are other important things to do, like having a good career.

181

I need to spend time on school and work, and so I only have time to practice love on a select number of people.

182

And for all these reasons, that's why I say our conception of love is messed up.

183

According to Jean Baudrillard, we interact more with what he calls hyper-reality than reality itself.

184

To explain what hyperreality is, I think it's best to just dive into one of Baudrillard's examples.

185

Consider the movie Apocalypse Now, a film about the Vietnam War.

186

The acting, the special effects, the sets, the editing.

187

Everything about the film is made so that when we watch it on our screen, it feels as real as possible.

188

Heck, it becomes more real than the real war.

189

Most of our understanding of the real Vietnam War comes from brief video clips online, some news articles documenting the big highlights,

190

maybe a speech from some politician, but we have no real experience of the real Vietnam War.

191

And the little bits and pieces we get from the news is an extremely watered-down version of the war.

192

They tell us how many people died, show short clips of soldiers fighting and innocent residents harmed, but what about the thousands of stories that go unheard.

193

The film Apocalypse Now ends up actually feeling more real than the real war.

194

When people talk about the Vietnam War, they picture scenes from the movie rather than the actual war.

195

The media that was originally an imitation of reality ends up being more real, thus hyper real.

196

The hyper real was originally a copy of something real, but then we start to interact with the hyperreal more than reality.

197

And so new forms of media end up imitating hyperreality rather than reality.

198

It becomes a loop of copies, copying copies, copying copies, until our lives are looking at copies of copies of copies.

199

I believe Stephen West from Philosophize This gave an example of how TV shows originally drew inspiration from real people

200

and real lives.

201

But But over time, new TV shows became inspired by past TV shows, creating shows that are now completely detached from reality.

202

For instance, How I Met Your Mother or Friends comes out, and we, in real life,

203

start to frame what happens to us in relation to these TV shows.

204

We create character tropes all the time that we then form our real relationships around, such as people saying, I want to be just like Lily and Marshall.

205

Monica and Chandler.

206

We see people have magical love at first sight moments on screen

207

and then build expectations of having the same magical feeling in real life.

208

The imaginary dictates reality.

209

These expectations and tropes constrain us in thinking love needs to be a certain way

210

or that if we start off as the hyper girlfriend calm boyfriend trope we need to maintain that trope.

211

But the thing is, these expectations and tropes are not based in reality.

212

Now how does everything we've talked about apply to common phrases online?

213

Let's start with, if he wanted to, he would.

214

Two things about this mindset bother me.

215

One, it builds the expectation that our partners, specifically men, should know what to do and know what we want without us communicating it.

216

Two, as many people have pointed out, it's literally contradictory.

217

Girls say, if he wanted to, he would, and so they don't tell their man what they want because he should just do it if he wants to.

218

But then if guys had the same mindset, then they would not make the first move either because they're thinking if she wanted to, she would.

219

And so no one would do anything.

220

Also, sometimes people want to do things but are not sure if they should, are scared, anxious, shy.

221

Or maybe they value your input, which I really hope they do.

222

Communication is so, so important.

223

If you truly love someone, you would not base your partner's worth on whether they give you exactly what you want.

224

You would care about how much you're giving them and whether you're both having a reciprocal relationship.

225

Before Valentine's Day, I saw quite a few TikToks talking about how women in heterosexual relationships should wait to see

226

if their man does something romantic for them without saying anything.

227

Or if you do say something, you should only mention it once.

228

If your man doesn't do anything or forgets that thing you had said once, it's a sign to end the relationship.

229

And they know that it's important to you.

230

You would only have had to say it once, right?

231

Because if they loved you, they would remember things that were important to you and it would be important to them too.

232

Move in silence on Valentine's Day.

233

Don't say anything.

234

Hide the gift you're getting them.

235

Hide the things that you're doing for them.

236

Not in a manipulative way, just wait.

237

If you walk away from that day disappointed,

238

feeling unappreciated, feeling alone, feeling like, ugh, they're right.

239

It's just a day.

240

It's commercialized.

241

It doesn't mean anything.

242

They show me they love me every day, so it doesn't really matter, and I do care about them, and I do...

243

Stop.

244

Okay?

245

The thing that bugged me the most is that these TikToks would say, even if he shows you that he loves you every other day,

246

if he misses the mark on this one commercialized, arbitrary day, then sorry, he clearly doesn't love you.

247

There is so much concern around what can my man do for me, can he meet my standards,

248

that this one day can determine the trajectory of the rest of your relationship?

249

I know it's different for everyone.

250

Maybe your boyfriend has amazing memory and grew up in a loving environment.

251

But for my boyfriend and I, we both have a lot going on in our lives.

252

And so it's unreasonable to expect us to remember something someone said once.

253

Just because I forget that he wanted a poke bowl today for dinner does not mean he's not important to me.

254

My boyfriend also grew up in a household without much celebratory spirit.

255

He didn't receive gifts for his birthday, for Christmas.

256

Him and his friends never even exchange gifts on special occasions.

257

And so, is it really fair for me to judge his love based on what he gives me, if he has never been taught to give material gifts?

258

Even as I'm saying this, I understand how hard it can be to not let these little things affect you.

259

We are surrounded by people who post picture-perfect moments of their relationship, and it constantly makes us fixate on how good the love we receive is.

260

We are convinced that we should never settle, that there is some person out there who will give us

261

a love as perfect as the ones we see in films and TV shows.

262

I experience this sometimes too.

263

Um, okay, that was a lie.

264

I actually experience this all the time.

265

One of my greatest fears is not being loved.

266

so honestly, this whole video is almost like a lecture to myself.

267

I've definitely got a lot to work on in the realm of love, so please don't think I feel superior to everyone, because I am not.

268

But that's why it's important to have a good level of self-love, so that you can squash paranoid worries about not being loved enough,

269

and judge your relationship with a more clear head.

270

And remember that these movies are not real.

271

They are hyper-real.

272

The love on your TV screen looks more perfect and more real than reality, so it makes you crave that hyper-reality.

273

But it is a mere copy.

274

Red flags is another term that has gained immense popularity.

275

I think it is absolutely important to watch out for red flags in a relationship, but this term has gotten overused.

276

People watch a 15 second clip online and suddenly everyone's got a psychology degree.

277

Here's how author Kim Baker defined red flags.

278

Red flags are whispers from our intuition that something isn't quite right.

279

A red flag is that sinking feeling we get in our stomachs when something bad happens.

280

They are slivers of evidence, usually showing up early on, that this relationship is not the right one for us.

281

A red flag warns that deal breakers are headed our way.

282

Now, I want to place emphasis on deal breakers, something that we absolutely cannot tolerate or is too much effort to fix.

283

Conversely, not knowing how to cook or having a perm is not a red flag.

284

That's just called not your preference.

285

Don't let random strangers who know nothing about your relationship control you and tell you what is a red flag.

286

I hope we all dedicate more time to thinking about how to love others,

287

how to build self-love, and avoid letting hyper-real displays of love mislead us.

288

You can like and sub if you want, leave a comment if you want.

289

Thank you so much for watching, let's keep talking, and I hope to hear from you soon.

290

Bye!

ดาวน์โหลดแอป

ทุกอย่างที่ต้องใช้เพื่อพูดได้คล่อง

AI ให้คะแนนการออกเสียงให้คะแนนทุกประโยค

ฝึก IPAเชี่ยวชาญทุกเสียง

คำศัพท์สร้างคลังคำของคุณ

เกมคำศัพท์เล่นไปเรียนไป

สแกน QR

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

ช่องเดียวกัน

we're not really strangers... but i wish we were

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

FOR YOU

วิดีโอแนะนำ

59 ประโยค

คำศัพท์และข้อสังเกตด้านการพูดสำหรับบทเรียนนี้

วิดีโอนี้มี 290 ประโยค และ 4106 คำ สำหรับฝึกพูดตาม ช่วงที่มีเสียงพูดยาว 25:38 ผู้พูดพูดด้วยความเร็วเป็นธรรมชาติ ประมาณ 160 คำต่อนาที ใกล้เคียงกับบทสนทนาในชีวิตประจำวัน 84% ของคำอยู่ใน 3,000 คำที่ใช้บ่อยที่สุดในภาษาอังกฤษ ส่วนที่เหลือควรดูไว้ก่อนเริ่มฝึก

คำศัพท์สำคัญในวิดีโอนี้

คำที่พบไม่บ่อย 15 คำจากวิดีโอ พร้อมคำอ่านและความหมาย:

lover /ˈlʌvɚ/ (คำนาม) — คู่รัก, คนรัก. One who loves and cares for another person in a romantic way; a sweetheart, love, soulmate, boyfriend, girlfriend, or spouse.
dominant /ˈdɑmənənt/ (คำคุณศัพท์) — เป็นใหญ่. Ruling; governing; prevailing
angel /ˈeɪ̯n.d͡ʒəl/ (คำนาม) — เทวดา, ทูตสวรรค์. An incorporeal and holy or semidivine messenger from a deity or other divine entity, traditionally depicted as a youthful, winged figure in flowing robes.
phrase /ˈfɹeɪ̯z/ (คำนาม) — วลี, ประโยค. A short written or spoken expression.
stranger /ˈstɹeɪnd͡ʒɚ/ (คำนาม) — ฝรั่ง. A person whom one does not know; a person who is neither a friend nor an acquaintance.
receiver /ɹəˈsi.vɚ/ (คำนาม) — ผู้รับ. A person who receives something in a general sense; a recipient.
capitalism /ˈkæp.ə.təlˌɪzm̩/ (คำนาม) — (ลัทธิ~)ทุนนิยม, ลัทธินายทุน. A socio-economic system based on private ownership of resources, and capital and their exploitation for profit.
commodity /kəˈmɑdəti/ (คำนาม) — สินค้า, โภคภัณฑ์. Anything movable (a good) that is bought and sold.
desirable /dɪˈzaɪəɹəbəl/ (คำคุณศัพท์) — พึงประสงค์, เป็นที่ต้องการ. Worthy to be desired; pleasing; agreeable.
premise /ˈpɹɛm.ɪs/ (คำนาม) — ข้อตั้ง. A proposition antecedently supposed or proved; something previously stated or assumed as the basis of further argument; a condition; a supposition.
surround /səˈɹaʊnd/ (คำกริยา) — ล้อม. To encircle something or simultaneously extend in all directions.
loneliness /ˈloʊnlinəs/ (คำนาม) — ความเหงา. A feeling of depression resulting from being alone or from having no companions.
necessarily /ˌnɛs.əˈsɛɹ.ə.li/ (คำกริยาวิเศษณ์) — ต้อง. Inevitably; of necessity.
silence /ˈsaɪ̯ləns/ (คำนาม) — ความเงียบ. The absence of any sound.
compare /kəmˈpɛɚ/ (คำกริยา) — เปรียบเทียบ. To assess the similarities and differences between two or more things [“to compare X with Y”]. Having made the comparison of X with Y, one might have found it…

กริยาวลีที่คุณจะได้ยิน

fall in (คำกริยา) — จัดแถว. To collapse inwards.
give back (คำกริยา) — คืน. To return, restore (a thing to its original owner or location etc.).
give up (คำกริยา) — ยอมแพ้. To surrender (someone or something); to inform on (someone).

การออกเสียงที่ควรระวัง

ผู้พูดใช้รูปย่อและรูปลดเสียง 63 ครั้ง เช่น I'm, don't, we're ให้พูดแบบสั้นตามที่ได้ยิน

เสียง “th”: smooth /smuːð/, bother /ˈbɑðɚ/
เสียง “sh” และ “zh”: expectation /ˌɛk.spɛkˈteɪ.ʃən/, suspicious /səˈspɪʃ.əs/, conception /kənˈsɛpʃən/, extension /ɪkˈstɛnʃən/, passion /ˈpæʃən/
คำยาว — ลงเสียงหนักให้ถูกพยางค์: expectation /ˌɛk.spɛkˈteɪ.ʃən/, capitalism /ˈkæp.ə.təlˌɪzm̩/, commodity /kəˈmɑdəti/, desirable /dɪˈzaɪəɹəbəl/, naturally /ˈnæt͡ʃ.(ə.)ɹə.li/

วิธีฝึกกับวิดีโอนี้

ฟังวิดีโอให้จบหนึ่งรอบโดยยังไม่ต้องพูด แล้วจดคำที่ยังไม่รู้จัก
เริ่มที่ความเร็ว 0.75× พูดตามทีละประโยค แล้วกลับไปใช้ความเร็วปกติเมื่อเริ่มคล่อง
อัดเสียงตัวเองแล้วเทียบกับต้นฉบับ โดยสังเกตคำอย่าง lover, dominant, angel เป็นพิเศษ

ไวยากรณ์ในวิดีโอนี้

โครงสร้างที่ผู้พูดใช้บ่อยที่สุด พร้อมคำพูดจริงจากวิดีโอ:

โครงสร้าง	ในวิดีโอ
ประโยคเงื่อนไข if + อนุประโยค, will/would + กริยา — เงื่อนไขและผลลัพธ์	If he wanted to, he would · If you truly love someone, you would not · if they loved you, they would remember
Present perfect have/has + กริยาช่อง 3 — เหตุการณ์ในอดีตที่ยังเกี่ยวข้องกับปัจจุบัน	they've already become · have fallen · I've come
Passive voice be + กริยาช่อง 3 — เน้นสิ่งที่เกิดขึ้น ไม่ใช่ผู้กระทำ	is sponsored · is based · are starved
Relative clauses who / which + อนุประโยค — ข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมเกี่ยวกับคนหรือสิ่งของ	people who sign · those who wait · possible, which is

เทคนิค Shadowing คืออะไร?

Shadowing เป็นเทคนิคการเรียนรู้ภาษาที่ได้รับการรับรองทางวิทยาศาสตร์ พัฒนาขึ้นสำหรับการฝึกนักแปลมืออาชีพ วิธีการนี้เรียบง่ายแต่ทรงพลัง: คุณฟังเสียงภาษาอังกฤษจากเจ้าของภาษาและพูดตามทันที — เหมือนเงาที่ตามผู้พูดด้วยช่วงเวลาห่าง 1-2 วินาที การวิจัยแสดงว่าเทคนิคนี้ปรับปรุงความแม่นยำในการออกเสียง ทำนองเสียง จังหวะ การเชื่อมเสียง การฟังเข้าใจ และความคล่องแคล่วในการพูดได้อย่างมีนัยสำคัญ

เทคนิค shadowing: อ่านคู่มือฉบับเต็มทีละขั้นตอน →

ฝึกพูดภาษาอังกฤษด้วยเทคนิค Shadowing จากวิดีโอ: our conception of love is messed up.

เลือกโหมดฝึก

ดาวน์โหลดแอป

it's okay to love bad people.

we're not really strangers... but i wish we were

Mistakes You’ll Make While Falling in Love

Oxytocin: The Love Hormone (#short)

love is how you treat someone, not how you feel about them

Every Romantic Orientation Explained in 10 Minutes [ Vol.2 ]

Why WANT something when you already HAVE EVERYTHING?

Wait What!? EP 9: Modern Love, Modern Mess

5 STAGES OF A CUCK

If a Bird Falls in Love With a Fish, Where Will They Live?

Lesbian flirting 101 (you're getting it wrong)

How to Love without fear

Watch this on June 16th ..(trust me)

Sexuality Professor Answers Dating Questions | Tech Support | WIRED