跟读练习: Stephen Fry Kinetic Typography - Language - 通过YouTube学习英语口语
C2
For me, it's a cause of some upset that more anglophones don't enjoy language.
94 句
如果句子过短或过长，请点击 Edit 进行调整。
1
For me, it's a cause of some upset that more anglophones don't enjoy language.
2
Music is enjoyable, it seems,
3
so are dance and other athletic forms of movement.
4
People seem to be able to find sensual and sensuous pleasure in almost anything but words these days.
5
Words, it seems, belong to other people.
6
Anyone who expresses themselves with originality,
7
delight and verbal freshness is more likely to be mocked,
8
distrusted or disliked than welcomed.
9
The free and happy use of words appears to be considered elitist or pretentious.
10
Sadly, desperately sadly,
11
the only people who seem to bother with language in public today bother with it in quite the wrong way.
12
They write letters to broadcasters and newspapers in which they are rude and haughty about other people's usage,
13
and in which they show off their own superior knowledge of how language should be.
14
I hate that, and I particularly hate the fact that so many of these pedants assume that I'm on their side.
15
When asked to join in a let's persuade this supermarket chain to get rid of their five items or less sign,
16
I never join in.
17
Yes, I am aware of the technical distinction between less
18
and fewer and between uninterested and disinterested and infer and imply
19
and all the rest of them but none of these are of importance to me.
20
None of these are of importance, I said there.
21
You'll notice the old pedantic me would have insisted on none of them is of importance.
22
Well, I'm glad to say I've outgrown that silly approach to language.
23
Oscar Wilde, and there have been few greater and more complete lords of language in the past thousand years,
24
once included with a manuscript he was delivering to his publishers a compliment slip,
25
in which he had scribbled the injunction,
26
I'll leave you to tidy up the woulds and shoulds,
27
wills and shalls, that's and which's,
28
etc. Which gives us all encouragement to feel less guilty, don't you think?
29
There are all kinds of pedants around,
30
with more time to read and imitate Lynn Truss and John Humphreys than to write poems,
31
love letters, novels and stories, it seems.
32
They whip out their sharpies and take away and add apostrophes from public signs,
33
shake their heads at prepositions which end sentences and mutter at split infinitives and misspellings,
34
But do they bubble and froth and slobber and cream with joy at language?
35
Do they ever let the tripping of the tips of their
36
tongues against the tops of their teeth transport them to giddy, euphoric bliss?
37
Do they ever yoke impossible words together for the sound sex of it?
38
Do they use language to seduce,
39
charm, excite, please, affirm, and tickle those they talk to?
40
Do they?
41
I doubt it.
42
Their two farting busy sneering at a greengrocer's less than perfect use of the apostrophe.
43
Well, sod them to Hades.
44
They think they're guardians of language.
45
They're no more guardians of language than the kennel club is the guardian of dog kind.
46
And the worst of this sorry bunch of semi-educated losers are
47
those who seem to glory in being irritated by nouns becoming verbs.
48
How dense and deft a language development do you have to be?
49
If you don't like nouns becoming verbs,
50
then for heaven's sake avoid Shakespeare,
51
who made a doing word out of a thing word every chance he got.
52
He tabled the motion and chaired the meeting in which nouns were made verbs.
53
I suppose new examples from our time might take some getting used to.
54
He actioned it that day,
55
for instance, strike some as a verbing too far,
56
but we've been sanctioning, envisioning,
57
propositioning, and stationing for a long time, so why not actioning?
58
Because it's ugly, whinge the pedants.
59
Well, it's only ugly because it's new and you don't like it.
60
Ugly in the way Picasso,
61
Stravinsky, and Eliot were once thought ugly,
62
and before them Monet, Mahler, and Baudelaire.
63
Pedants will also claim, with what I'm sure is eye-popping insincerity and shameless disingenuousness,
64
that their fight is only for clarity.
65
Well, this is all very well,
66
but there's no doubt what,
67
for example, five items or less means.
68
Just as only adult can't tell from the context
69
and from the age
70
and education of the speaker whether disinterested is used in the proper sense of non-partisan or in the improper sense of uninterested.
71
No, the claim to be defending language for the sake of
72
clarity almost never ever holds water nor does the idea
73
that following grammatical rules in language demonstrates clarity of thought and intelligence of mind.
74
Having said this, I admit that if you want to communicate well for the sake of passing an exam or job interview,
75
then it's obvious that wildly original and excessively heterodox language could land you in the soup.
76
I think what offends examiners and employers when confronted with extremely informal,
77
unpunctuated and haywire language is the implication of not caring that underlies it.
78
You slip into a suit for an interview and you dress your language up too.
79
You can wear what you like linguistically or sartorily when you're at home or with friends,
80
but most people accept the need to smarten up under some circumstances.
81
It's only considerate.
82
But that's an issue of fitness, of suitability.
83
It has nothing to do with correctness.
84
There's no right language or wrong language any more than there are right or wrong clothes.
85
Context, convention and circumstance are all.
86
I can't deny that a small part of me still clings to a ghastly Radio 4 newspaper letter-writer pedantry,
87
but I fight against it.
88
In much the same way,
89
I try to fight against my gluttony,
90
anger, selfishness, and other vices.
91
I must confess, for example,
92
that I find it hard not to wince when someone aspirates the word,
93
and it is a word, H-A-I-T-C-H.
94
Thank you.
下载应用
AI 为你说出的每个句子打分
TRENDING
热门
为什么要通过这个视频练习口语？
观看这段斯蒂芬·弗莱的演讲视频，不仅能够提升你对英语的理解，还能够为你提供一个绝佳的雅思口语练习机会。在视频中，弗莱以其独特的风格和生动的表达方式吸引观众，这对于学习者来说，能够帮助你感受到语言的魅力和节奏。通过模仿其语调和表达，你可以提高你的发音技巧，增强你的口语流利度，进而在日常交流中自信地使用英语。此外，通过“shadow speech”技巧的练习，学习者可以更好地掌握对话的节奏和语气，进而提高沟通能力。
语法与表达的语境
- 使用“none of them are of importance”表达否定：这个结构可以帮助你在谈论不重要的事情时更清晰地表达观点。
- 使用“Do they ever...”的反问句：这样的句式能加强你的质疑语气，同时也能仿效弗莱引导观众思考的方式。
- 提到“with originality, delight and verbal freshness”来强调创造性：在口语交流中，运用生动的形容词可以让你的表达更加引人注目。
- “I'll leave you to tidy up the woulds and shoulds”表示委婉的请求：这样的表达能够让你的口语更加礼貌和含蓄。
常见发音陷阱
在这段视频中，弗莱的快速说话和丰富的词汇可能会给学习者带来一些发音挑战。首先，单词“importance”的重音可能会让人感到困惑，你需要练习如何准确强调每个音节。其次，像“seduce”和“delight”这些词的发音也值得注意，因为它们在快节奏的对话中容易被吞音。建议学习者在练习时多关注这些难度较大的单词，并结合“shadowspeak”练习，以确保能够自如地表达。此外，提升你的发音技巧能够显著提高你的交际自信，特别是在雅思口语部分。
什么是跟读法？
跟读法 (Shadowing) 是一种有科学依据的语言学习技巧，最初开发用于专业口译员的培训，并由多语言者Alexander Arguelles博士普及。这个方法简单而强大：您在听英语母语原声的同时立即大声重复——就像是一个延迟1-2秒紧跟说话者的影子。与被动听力或语法练习不同，跟读法强迫您的大脑和口腔肌肉同时处理并模仿真实的讲话模式。研究表明它能显着提高发音准确性，语调，节奏，连读，听力理解和口语流利度——使其成为雅思口语备考和真实英语交流最有效的方法之一。