Shadowing-Übung: Episode 10: The Inescapable US China Rivalry - Englisch Sprechen Lernen mit Video
Lektion wird erstellt...
1
The United States is a mortal enemy of China.
2
Since 2017, an intense security competition has set in between the United States and China.
3
The West is leading Ukraine down the primrose path.
4
The Israelis are executing a genocide in Gaza.
5
It's not China's fault that it wants to be powerful.
6
So if you get into trouble and you dial 9 -1 -1, there's nobody at the other end.
7
Hi, this is John Mearsheimer.
8
And the subject I'd like to talk today about is the recent meeting between President Trump
9
and President Xi Jinping in Washington, D .C.
10
And just to put this into some context, this is actually the eighth meeting between the two of them.
11
There were five meetings during President Trump's first term, which of course ran from 2017 to 2021.
12
But this is the third meeting in President Trump's second term.
13
And of course, he came to office in January of 2025.
14
And the first meeting between these two leaders took place in South Korea in October of 2025.
15
That's a little less than a year ago.
16
That was the first meeting in his second term.
17
The second meeting between them in President Trump's second term took place in Beijing this May.
18
and this meeting last week between september 23
19
and september 25 was the third meeting
20
and it took place of course in washington dc
21
and what i want to do is i want to talk about this meeting
22
that just took place there were five big issues on the
23
agenda uh number one of course was taiwan number two was Iran number three was Ukraine number four was AI
24
and number five was the general trade patterns between the two countries
25
so those are the five big issues
26
that were discussed some more than others at this summit and
27
And I think there's almost universal agreement that in terms of reaching meaningful agreement on these issues,
28
the two actors, the two presidents basically failed.
29
The Economist had a story
30
which took both leaders to task for passing up this wonderful opportunity to deal in a serious way with these five issues.
31
And it basically accused the two leaders of being irresponsible.
32
I think the language that the economists used was that they were guilty of dereliction of duty.
33
Now, my view is that this is not true,
34
that it was almost impossible for these two leaders to reach a meaningful agreement on the five issues that were at play.
35
The only exception to this, as I'll talk about, is the whole subject of trade between the two countries.
36
There, I think, there was possibility for some agreement, and in fact, you got some agreement.
37
But on the other four issues, there was virtually no hope of getting any meaningful agreement.
38
And I want to explain why that's the case.
39
So the basic laydown of my talk will go like this.
40
First of all, I'll describe what happened in Washington last week.
41
And then I'll explain to you why I think things turned out the way that they did.
42
And then I'll conclude by making three remarks of a general nature that build on the previous discussion.
43
So let me start by just talking about what happened in Washington this past week.
44
And let me start with what I will call the three strategic issues.
45
And the three strategic issues are first of all Taiwan second Iran
46
and third Ukraine
47
and in the case of Taiwan it was the Chinese who
48
had demands whereas you'll see in the case of Iran and in the case of Ukraine it was the Americans
49
who had demands that they were placing on the Chinese.
50
Now to go to Taiwan,
51
what the Chinese want from the United States is they want the United States to basically halt all arms shipments to Taiwan.
52
And the United States is pondering the question of whether or not to give a $14 billion arms package to Taiwan.
53
and it almost goes without saying that the Chinese absolutely do not want that to happen.
54
So that's one of the issues that was at play regarding Taiwan.
55
The other issue just has to do with the question of Taiwanese independence.
56
The Chinese want the United States to play hardball with Taiwan
57
and tell the Taiwanese in no uncertain terms that they cannot declare independence from China.
58
And indeed, they cannot even hint that they are interested in gaining independence over the long term from China.
59
What happened at the summit is the United States basically dodged around these issues.
60
The United States, and here of course we're talking about President Trump made no concessions to the Chinese on the Taiwan issue.
61
President Trump said that we talked about these issues, and basically not a lot of time was spent on Taiwan, and everything is good.
62
We're not having any major problems.
63
But all of this is a way to say
64
that the United States did not accede to any of china's
65
demands on taiwan then we go to the subject of iran
66
and here it's the americans who are making demands on the chinese or asking the chinese to help
67
with regard to the american war in iran and there are a number of issues at play here First of all,
68
the Americans would like the Chinese to put pressure on Iran to concede to American demands
69
and reach some sort of peace settlement.
70
As I'm sure all the viewers know, the United States is desperate to end the war in Iran.
71
And because Iran and China have close relations,
72
the United States tends to think that the Chinese are in a position to put pressure on Iran to end the war.
73
So, the Trump administration has been asking China to do exactly that.
74
Furthermore, the Trump administration is deeply interested in making sure
75
that China does not continue to provide weapons or intelligence or military support of any kind to the Iranians.
76
There's evidence that that is happening.
77
the wall street journal ran a big story
78
that talked about all the military aid that china is giving to iran
79
and it's obviously in america's interest to get the chinese to stop providing weaponry
80
and intelligence to the iranians and there's no question
81
that president trump requested that china do that
82
and unsurprisingly the chinese refused there's no evidence
83
that the chinese are going to accommodate the united states in any way on the whole subject of iran
84
and then we get to ukraine
85
and here again the united states is asking for help from the chinese
86
and what president trump would like to do
87
and he's made this clear since he was a candidate for
88
re -election in 2024 is end the ukraine war as quickly as possible he of course has failed in
89
that regard and what he would like the chinese to do is put pressure on the russians to end
90
that war because the russians and the chinese are obviously allies
91
and the trump administration knows that china has been aiding russia in its fight against ukraine
92
and what the united states would like to do here
93
or what president trump would like to do is he'd like
94
to get the chinese to put significant pressure on russia
95
and get russia to at least reach an agreement on a ceasefire
96
and then hopefully get some sort of meaningful peace agreement so
97
that this war comes to an end so what you see here is
98
that president trump was asking china for help to solve both the iran war and the ukraine war And in both cases,
99
the Chinese showed no interest in helping President Trump.
100
So what you see on these three strategic issues, Taiwan, Iran, and Ukraine, is that there was no movement at all.
101
The Americans were not willing to accommodate the Chinese over Taiwan,
102
and the Chinese were not willing to accommodate the United States over both Iran and Ukraine.
103
And we get to the two, let's call them economic issues that were on the table.
104
One is AI, and then two is the general trade relationship between the two countries.
105
With regard to AI, there was definitely a lot of hope among outsiders,
106
people outside the Trump administration and outside the Xi Jinping administration,
107
that the two sides would reach some sort of meaningful agreement on AI, having to do mainly with the fact that there's great fear
108
that this technology might get out of control
109
and do really serious damage not only inside one of those two countries
110
but around the world there's a real fear
111
that AI has the potential to cause catastrophic damage
112
and therefore lots of people are very interested in seeing the chinese
113
and the united states work to overcome this potential problem
114
or to deal with this problem should come to the fore
115
in fact president trump has no interest in putting any limits on ai
116
and all the evidence is that the chinese have no interest in putting any limits on AI.
117
So when you talk about what happened at the summit in terms of AI,
118
basically you had two leaders coming together who had no interest in curbing their own development of AI.
119
And unsurprisingly, you got no agreement to put limits on the development of ai
120
so there was no progress here made in terms of reaching some sort of agreement
121
that might limit the potential for catastrophic disaster down the road then we get to the subject of trade
122
and trade's a very interesting issue
123
because this is where this is the one of the five areas where there was some progress
124
and let me describe the situation there
125
and the best way to do it is to go back to
126
when president trump first took office in january 2025 as i'm
127
sure many people remember president trump came out of the blocks
128
in january 2025 determined to put significant tariffs on virtually every state on the planet.
129
And he did not hesitate to increase tariffs on China right away.
130
And he did this in February, and then he did it again in March.
131
And you want to remember that April 2nd was what he called Liberation Day.
132
April 2nd was when he was really going to ramp up the tariffs on every country in the world, again, including China.
133
And after Liberation Day, tariffs on China went up to 145%.
134
This is truly remarkable.
135
145 % tariffs on China after Liberation Day.
136
The Chinese unsurprisingly retaliated, and they levied tariffs of 125 % on the United States.
137
If one country has 145 % tariffs on the other, and the other has 125 % tariffs on the other,
138
there's no way you're going to have any kind of meaningful trade between the two sides.
139
In addition to that problem,
140
the fact is that the United States began to realize very quickly that the Chinese had significant leverage over the United States,
141
which made it very difficult for President Trump to play hardball with the Chinese with regard to tariffs.
142
And that is that the Chinese control almost all of the world's rare earth minerals,
143
And they control other critical minerals as well that the United States absolutely, absolutely needs.
144
So the Chinese were in a position where they could withhold rare earths.
145
from the United States and this would have devastating economic consequences on the U .S economy
146
so as a result of this the United States in effect had to back off
147
so what happens on May 12th this is 2025 what happens
148
on May 12th 2025 is the two sides the Chinese and the Americans decide to greatly reduce their tariffs.
149
The American tariffs on China go down from 145 % to 30%.
150
And the Chinese tariffs on the United States go down from 30%, excuse me, from 125 % to 10%.
151
So you see, you have this significant reduction in tariffs.
152
And you begin to work out a modus vivendi between the two sides regarding tariffs this agreement
153
that they reach on may 12th is renewed in august of 2025
154
and then very importantly you have the first meeting of trump and xi jinping in october 2025.
155
remember i said there were three meetings between these leaders the
156
first was not in trump's second term the first was in october 2025 the second was in may 2026
157
and then the third was the one that just took place
158
and so you had a meeting in october 2025 between the two leaders
159
and they basically came to an agreement that would last for one year
160
that basically put an end to the tit -for -tat trade war
161
that had been taking place between the two sides
162
and locked in an arrangement where tariffs were kept pretty much in place and the two sides were able to trade.
163
That was done as a result of the meeting in October of 2025.
164
Then the two leaders met again the second meeting in beijing in may of this year that's may 2026
165
and they made some incremental progress in reducing tariffs and increasing trade between the two sides
166
now the third meeting just took place between the two leaders in washington dc
167
which is of course the subject i want to talk about today
168
and what happened at this meeting are basically two things number one the two sides agreed to extend the agreement
169
that had been reached last october october 2025 for two more months
170
so it will run through this year furthermore it's now clear
171
that the two sides reached an agreement to reduce tariffs on roughly $60 billion in goods.
172
Each side has agreed to reduce tariffs by $30 billion on the other side.
173
And of course, two times 30 equals 60.
174
So tariffs have been reduced by a significant amount on $60 billion of goods
175
that are traded between the United States and China.
176
Now, it's very important to understand that these are basically commercial and agricultural goods.
177
The deal here has nothing to do with things like rare earths or AI -related technologies,
178
those strategically important technologies.
179
What's involved here are medical devices, agricultural goods, fish hooks, car seats,
180
Christmas goods, and so forth and so on.
181
I don't want to minimize the fact that you do have a substantial reduction of tariffs on $60 billion worth of goods,
182
but this is of limited consequence, and it certainly does not involve things like AI or rare earths.
183
But the key point you want to keep in mind here is
184
that it's on the subject of trade between the two sides
185
where you did get some agreement at the September summit that just took place.
186
And that agreement builds on what took place in May of this year at the summit in Beijing
187
and what happened last October, October 2025 in South Korea.
188
But with regard to the other four issues, and this of course includes Taiwan,
189
Iran, Ukraine, and AI, there was no meaningful agreement.
190
Now, what's going on here?
191
Let me start at a general level and then go down
192
and look at each of those five issues and say more about those issues.
193
At a general level, we have to go back to 2017.
194
Two things happened in 2017 that are of great importance.
195
Number one is that China and Russia basically become great powers at that point in time.
196
uh up until 2017 the united states uh operated in what was called the unipolar moment
197
and of course the united states was the unipole it was the only great power in the international system
198
and during that period the united states pursued a policy of liberal hegemony towards the towards the Chinese.
199
And what that meant was
200
that the United States was willing to facilitate significant economic intercourse with the Chinese
201
and help China grow into a remarkably powerful state.
202
But what happens in 2017 is that by that point in time, China has grown so powerful economically and militarily,
203
that it is effectively a great power.
204
And at the same time, in 2017, the Russians are once again a great power.
205
Vladimir Putin, who had become the leader of Russia in late 1999, by 2017 has basically brought the Russians back from the dead.
206
So you go from a unipolar world to a multipolar world in roughly 2017.
207
Now, it's of enormous enormous importance for our discussion today of the U .S.
208
China summit is to focus on China as a great power
209
and the key point here is that China is a remarkably formidable great power
210
it has the potential
211
and I want to underline the word potential to become more powerful than the United States moving forward
212
because of the large size of its population and because of its ability to develop sophisticated technologies.
213
So when China comes online as a great power in 2017,
214
there is significant fear that it is a truly peer competitor of the United States.
215
And there's a great fear that China might dominate Asia the way the United States dominates the Western Hemisphere.
216
So that's one thing that's happening around 2017.
217
The second thing that happens is President Trump moves into the White House.
218
As almost everyone remembers, he gets elected for the first time in November of 2016,
219
and he becomes the president in January of 2017.
220
When President Trump campaigned during the 2016 presidential campaign,
221
he argued that the policy of liberal hegemony,
222
the policy of engaging with China and helping China to grow was remarkably foolish.
223
And what he was going to do as soon as he moved into the White House, was abandon engagement, abandon liberal hegemony.
224
And he was going instead to pursue a policy of containment.
225
And when he moves into the White House, he immediately does that.
226
And he's very cognizant at the time, as is virtually everybody in his national security staff,
227
that we are now in a multipolar world
228
so president trump in 2017 ends engagement with china moves away from liberal hegemony moves to containment
229
and focuses laser -like on china
230
and pursues a very hard line towards china during his first
231
administration as i'm sure many viewers remember President Trump was actually initially interested in having good relations with Russia
232
and focusing mainly on China as a potential adversary of the United States during his first term.
233
So this is the basic background that you get with regard to President Trump Trump and what happens in 2017.
234
And the argument that I would make is that since 2017, whether you're talking about the Biden administration,
235
the first Trump administration or the second Trump administration, is that the relationship between China and the United States has been.
236
basically adversarial that's the big picture now what i want to
237
do is i want to talk about the five big issues on the table
238
and how they played out at the recent washington summit
239
start with taiwan taiwan is an island that is of huge strategic significance to the united states
240
and to china as well
241
and by the way as far as china is concerned it's
242
not not only of huge strategic significance it is sacred territory
243
the chinese for good nationalist reasons are deeply committed to making
244
taiwan part of china the idea of taiwan being independent is
245
unacceptable to virtually every chinese person i've met over the course of my life.
246
They want Taiwan back.
247
And of course, from an American point of view, Taiwan is of great strategic importance, and keeping Taiwan independent really matters.
248
If you're interested in bottling up the Chinese Navy and the Chinese Air Force inside the first island chain,
249
uh the americans need to control taiwan the americans also worry if they abandon taiwan
250
that the end result would be
251
that other allies of the united states in east asia would lose faith in the united states
252
and this would make it impossible for the united states to contain china
253
one doesn't have to accept the logic
254
that i just laid out for why the united states thinks
255
it has to maintain an independent taiwan indeed a taiwan
256
that is allied with the united states
257
but the fact is u .s policy makers think in those terms
258
and in fact it's important to emphasize here
259
that the biden administration said on four separate occasions or i should say president Biden himself said on four separate occasions,
260
that the United States would defend Taiwan.
261
All of this tells you that the United States is extremely unlikely to make any meaningful concessions on Taiwan.
262
And it's hardly surprising
263
that President Trump made no concessions on Taiwan at the Washington summit there's no way
264
that any American leader at this point in time is going to make concessions on Taiwan now what about Iran
265
and here the Americans are asking the Chinese to make concessions
266
or to help the United States deal with the problems
267
that it faces in the Iran war this is not in
268
China's interest China has no good strategic reason to help the
269
United States as I tried to make clear the United States is a mortal enemy of China.
270
Since 2017, an intense security competition has set in between the United States and China.
271
There's no question that that security competition waxes and wanes.
272
Sometimes it's more intense than others.
273
But nevertheless, US -China relations today are characterized by an intense security competition, an intense security competition.
274
And that dates back to roughly 2017.
275
Well, if the United States is in deep trouble in Iran, it's losing its war in Iran,
276
the Chinese obviously have no interest in helping the United States win that war.
277
In fact, the Chinese have a vested interest in making sure that the United States loses that war.
278
And therefore, it's hardly unsurprising that the Chinese are providing weaponry and providing intelligence to the Iranians.
279
And in terms of the economic intercourse between the two countries,
280
the Chinese are unwilling to cut off economic support or trade relations with Iran.
281
The Iranians have a vested interest in making sure that Iran wins the fight.
282
In fact, one could argue that Iran, excuse me, that China has a vested interest in making sure
283
that the war remains protracted and that the United States remains pinned down.
284
in its fight against Iran.
285
Now, why am I saying that?
286
To fight this war in the Middle East,
287
the United States has had to withdraw significant numbers of weapons and forces from East Asia
288
and placed them in the Middle East.
289
The USS George Washington, the only American aircraft carrier that's now in the Middle East, was pulled out of East Asia.
290
It's normally stationed in Japan, but the United States had to pull it out of Japan and move it to the Middle East.
291
The United States has moved Patriot missiles and THAAD missiles out of East Asia into the Middle East.
292
In a very important way what the united states is doing
293
is pivoting away from east asia to the middle east this is obviously in china's interest
294
when the trump administration decided to adopt the policy of containment
295
in 2017 it was deeply committed for obvious reasons to pivoting to asia not pivoting away from asia but
296
because of the war in iran the united states is now
297
pivoting away from asia this is obviously not in america's interest
298
and is in china's interest all of this is a way of saying
299
that the chinese have a deep -seated interest in making sure that iran does not lose the war
300
against the united states and indeed
301
that the war goes on for a long period of time because that will work to China's strategic situation in East Asia.
302
So, unsurprisingly, at the Washington summit, the Chinese were unwilling to help the United States deal with its troubles in Iran.
303
A similar logic applies to Ukraine.
304
What's going on in Ukraine?
305
Russia is fighting Ukraine, and of course, the United States and the Europeans are allied with the Ukrainians.
306
You want to remember that when multipolarity came, when unipolarity ends and multipolarity comes, there are three great powers in the system,
307
the United States and China, which we've been talking about at some length, but the third great power is Russia.
308
And it turns out that Russia ends up allied with China.
309
China has a deep -seated interest in maintaining a close relationship with the third great power in the system
310
and keeping that third great power Russia on its side of the ledger
311
so obviously the Chinese have been helping the Russians in their war in Ukraine
312
and the Chinese have a deep -seated interest in making sure
313
that Russia prevails over Ukraine because Ukraine is joined at the hip with the United States
314
and the United States is a mortal enemy of China.
315
So basically what you see with regard to Ukraine is
316
that China is helping the Russians to prevail against Ukraine plus the United States,
317
and as was the case with Iran,
318
you saw there that the Chinese have a vested interest in helping Iran prevail against the United States.
319
So all of this is to say the Chinese were unwilling to help the United States on either Ukraine
320
or on Iran at the Washington summit.
321
And of course, as I said, the United States was not willing to accommodate the Chinese over Taiwan.
322
This brings us to the question of AI.
323
As I said before,
324
neither side was interested in reaching an agreement last week in Washington that would curtail their pursuit of AI.
325
And why is that the case?
326
Well, you want to understand that the strategic competition between China
327
and the United States that is now taking place involves not just military forces,
328
it involves the competition over sophisticated technologies.
329
And here we're talking especially about AI.
330
So what you see is that when it comes to AI,
331
the United States and the Chinese are arms racing the united states is working overtime to see
332
if it can gain an advantage over the chinese in terms of developing AI.
333
The Chinese, for their part,
334
are interested in seeing if they can gain an advantage over the United States in terms of developing AI.
335
Because both sides understand that if there is going to be a single winner in the AI realm,
336
that winner will benefit greatly from not just an economic point of view,
337
but from a military point of view as well it will matter economically
338
because the growth of one's economy depends heavily on AI.
339
And if one's side dominates in the realm of AI, that side will benefit more than the other side economically.
340
But it also has a military dimension to it.
341
So you have this situation where neither side at this point in time is interested in cooperating,
342
and therefore no No attempt was made of any consequence in
343
the Washington meetings between these two presidents to slow down the competition in AI.
344
They are arms racing away.
345
This then brings us to the whole subject of trade.
346
As I said before, trade was the one realm where there was some agreement.
347
It was limited agreement.
348
Now, it's very important to understand that we should expect trade to exist between the United States and China.
349
We should not expect trade to exist when it comes to things like rare earths or things like AI.
350
You're not going to get any trade there
351
because you have an intense competition where one side is trying to either gain or maintain an advantage over the other.
352
In the case of rare earths, the Chinese already have an advantage.
353
And in terms of AI, you have this intense arms racing take place, as I described before.
354
So you're not going to get any meaningful agreement at this point in time on those issues.
355
But on agricultural issues, commercial issues, there you'll get some agreement.
356
Now, this is hardly surprising.
357
And let me tell two very quick stories to illustrate this.
358
If you look at the period before World War I, World War I, of course, breaks out in 1914, August 1st, 1914.
359
Before World War I, there were these two alliances in Europe, the Triple Entente, which included Britain,
360
France, and Russia, and then the Triple Alliance, which was Germany, Italy, and Austria -Hungary.
361
And Austria -Hungary and Italy were not really very reliable allies.
362
It was really Germany against Britain, France, and Russia.
363
And there was an intense security competition between these two alliances.
364
At the same time you had this intense security competition,
365
you had a great deal of economic intercourse among all of the countries in Europe.
366
So the Germans traded with the French, they traded with the Russians, and they traded with the British.
367
There was a lot of economic dealings, a lot of trade between all of the parties.
368
All of this is to say, when you see trade taking place between two countries like China
369
and the united states that are involved in a serious security competition you shouldn't be surprised
370
because oftentimes there is lots of trade side by side with security competitions
371
between or among states uh in the international system and you saw this again before world war one.
372
So it's not surprising that this is what you're seeing happening between the United States and China.
373
And remember what happened here, just to go back over the history.
374
When President Trump came to office, he thought he was going to play hardball with the Chinese.
375
And he started this tit -for -tat tariff war with the Chinese after he moved into the White House in January 2025.
376
And when he found out that the Chinese have a second strike capability, he backed off.
377
And the end result is you've now had a series of summits
378
which have facilitated the development of trade between the two sides.
379
And again, this is not surprising when you look at what happened before World War I.
380
My second story has to do with...
381
The whole subject of trading during wartime, most people will find this hard to believe.
382
But the fact is that when great powers go to war, they nevertheless sometimes, one could argue even,
383
oftentimes continue to trade with each other.
384
And a former student of mine wrote a brilliant book called Trade in War that deals with this very subject.
385
Enemies, countries that are fighting with each other.
386
This was true in World War I, for example, between Britain and Germany.
387
Once the war broke out, they continue to do some trading with each other.
388
This is called sometimes trading with the enemy.
389
All of this is to say that you can see where trade would take place today between China and the United States,
390
because thankfully there's no war taking place between the two countries.
391
But we know from the historical record that there have been cases where you have actual wars between two great powers,
392
and they nevertheless continue to trade with each other.
393
And they, of course, do it because it is in their interest.
394
but nevertheless you want to understand that there are real limits to how much trade
395
can take place and you're certainly not going to get trade with regard to things like ai
396
semiconductors rare earths and so forth and so on
397
so let me now conclude uh with a number of different
398
points first of all i want to make it clear
399
and this is apparent in terms of what i just said about uh trade between china
400
and the united states today cooperation is possible between two countries
401
that are engaged in a security competition uh and trade is possible
402
when both sides think it's in their interest as i said before
403
and to put it more general terms cooperation is possible
404
when two states think they have a mutual interest in cooperating with each other
405
and they think that that That cooperation will not advantage one side over the other side.
406
As most people fully understand, during the Cold War, we had a series of arms control agreements between the United States and the Soviet Union.
407
Those were cooperative endeavors, and the United States and the Soviet Union engaged engaged in those arms control agreements,
408
because they thought it was to their advantage to agree
409
that they had a mutual interest in reaching an arms control agreement on this matter or that matter.
410
And at the same time, they felt that neither side was gaining an advantage over the other.
411
And therefore, they weren't being disadvantaged by cooperation.
412
So it's very important to understand that you should expect to see some cooperation between the United States and China.
413
And of course, this is exactly what we see in the trade realm.
414
But the key point you want to keep in mind is that that cooperation takes place in the shadow of security competition.
415
And that security competition, again, I want to emphasize this, has a military dimension.
416
This is what containment is all about.
417
And it has an economic dimension.
418
And the economic dimension involves AI, semiconductors, rare earths, and so forth, and so on.
419
But again, cooperation is possible.
420
I want to say one other word about cooperation, and that involves AI.
421
As everybody knows, it's very hard to say where AI is headed.
422
and i think we would be foolish not to recognize that there is some possibility
423
that this technology could get out of control and possibly cause or threaten to cause
424
catastrophic damage to one side or to both sides i think in
425
that situation both sides would have a vested interest in cooperating
426
to avoid catastrophic damage all this is to say it is possible moving forward Given the potential dangers associated with AI,
427
the competition between the two sides will be greatly ameliorated, and you will have cooperative agreements between them
428
because it's in their mutual interest to reach an agreement to make sure that we avoid a catastrophe.
429
So my basic point here is cooperation is possible,
430
and we may, and I underline the word may, seek cooperation with regard to AI in the years or decades ahead.
431
The second concluding point I want to make is
432
that you don't want to just look at what happened in the September meeting between President Xi
433
and President Trump to grasp how contentious the relationship is between the two sides and how difficult it is,
434
almost impossible to reach meaningful agreement on so many key issues.
435
because we have two other cases of where the two leaders met
436
and did not reach significant agreement on any issue except trade
437
and even on trade they reached limited agreements and this is the october
438
2025 meeting in south korea
439
and the may 2026 meeting in beijing remember the september 2026 summit is the third summit between these two leaders.
440
There was one last year and one earlier this year in May.
441
And if you look at what happened in all three of those meetings,
442
you see that what happened last week is not an anomaly.
443
It basically reflects what happened in the two previous meetings.
444
My final point is that a lot of people, I believe, were optimistic, at least for a while,
445
that some serious progress might have been made on all those five issues that I describe,
446
especially Taiwan, at the recent summit in Washington.
447
And the reason that they were so optimistic is that President Trump actually has been,
448
let me put it that way,
449
President Trump has been remarkably accommodating toward the Chinese in his rhetoric in recent months.
450
Let me put this into a broader context.
451
Next, when President Trump came to office, as I said before, in January of 2017, he abandoned engagement with China,
452
moved to containment, and he really adopted a rough policy toward China.
453
He was seriously interested in containing China.
454
After he left office, President Biden really doubled down on what President Trump did.
455
It's very important to understand that.
456
You might think that President Trump was not the hardliner, excuse me, that President Biden was not the hardliner that President Trump was,
457
and therefore President Biden moved back toward engagement.
458
No way.
459
President Biden doubled down on President Trump's policies towards China in President Trump's first term.
460
Okay, President Biden leaves office and President Trump comes back into the White House in January of 2025.
461
As I said earlier in this episode,
462
President Trump came out of the starting blocks with guns firing.
463
What he did was he immediately put tariffs on China
464
and began to initiate a trade war with China that he thought that he could win.
465
He decided to play hardball with the Chinese,
466
which was consistent with what he had done in his first term and consistent with what President Biden had done.
467
But what happens then, as I said before, is the Chinese demonstrate that they have a second strike capability and President Trump backs off.
468
And this is where you get But basically, a modus vivendi between the two sides starts on May 12th of 2025,
469
and we see it reflected in the October 2025 summit, and also in the May 2026 summit.
470
So this is one reason that President Trump becomes more accommodating toward I've heard.
471
the Chinese, this and in the past few months.
472
The second reason is the Iran war.
473
President Trump, as you all know, goes to war on February 28th against Iran, and his belief is he's going to win a quick and easy victory.
474
That doesn't happen.
475
And the United States is now mired in this conflict that it's desperate to get out of.
476
The last thing
477
that President Trump needs at this point in time is for
478
a conflict to break out of any sort in east asia
479
if you think about the situation
480
that president trump is in he's in deep trouble in terms
481
of the iran war he's in deep trouble with regard to the ukraine war
482
which he's also been unable to shut down he faces a real danger
483
that he will lose both of those wars but nevertheless the last thing
484
that he wants to do is for a conflict to break out in East Asia.
485
So he's been going to great lengths to play nice with the Chinese to make sure
486
that there is no trouble in East Asia, because that's the last thing he needs.
487
Furthermore, President Trump has had little success on the diplomatic front in recent months, the Iran war, the Ukraine war,
488
what's going on in Gaza, and the state of the international economy
489
so he needs a win he needs a victory
490
so having a successful summit with xi jinping in washington last week is an event
491
that he can claim shows he's in control and
492
that he can win when the chips are on the table
493
so president trump had all sorts of incentives in recent months
494
to work out a deal with the Chinese as best he could on a variety of issues.
495
But when you look carefully at what actually happened, and you look carefully at what President Trump's real incentives were,
496
those strategic incentives that are at the heart of the thinking of any American president you see
497
that it's unsurprising
498
that he was unable to do anything more than reach limited accommodations on the trade front
499
and the argument I would make to conclude with is
500
that as we move forward what is likely to happen is that President Trump's relationship with the Chinese with Xi Jinping,
501
and the American relationship with China, if anything, is likely to deteriorate over time.
502
And I think the period that we have just gone through, or that we are going through, where the United States, and President Trump in particular,
503
have friendly relations with the Chinese on the surface, is going to be seen as an anomaly.
504
And that period that went from roughly January 2017 up until May 12th of 2026,
505
when the United States was constantly playing hardball with the Chinese, and where the rhetoric was quite hard nosed from the American side,
506
that is likely to characterize relations in the future.
507
And the present situation where the rhetoric is quite friendly certainly on the american side that's likely to disappear on
508
that sad note let me conclude this episode
509
and thank all of you for watching and i look forward to our next chance to get together
📺 Gleicher Kanal
✨ Empfohlenes Video
B23
133 Sätze
Trump is Erasing 50 Years of Foreign Policy (They Can't Stop It)
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C11
123 Sätze
Why the Mecca Agreement is a necessary show of force | The David Hearst Podcast
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C12
384 Sätze
President Obama Speaks at the General Assembly
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C1588 Sätze
The Iran War Is the Biggest Strategic Blunder in US History (w/ John Mearsheimer) | TCHR
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C12
150 Sätze
John Mearsheimer: Why Russia Might NUKE Europe
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B22
91 Sätze
Trung Cộng đang tự cắn xé chính mình | Trung Quốc Không Kiểm Duyệt
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
B21
545 Sätze
“Trump was a great president” | Charlie Kirk Debates Parker
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C25
206 Sätze
US China Talks Begin | Filipino Senate in Lockdown | Prolonged Russian strikes on Kyiv
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C14
44 Sätze
The Tribute System: The new World Order
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepBusiness English
![#234 [고급영어] 백악관 브리핑 | 캐롤라인 레빗 (백악관 대변인) | 국제 협정 및 양해각서 위반 분석 화법 | 테러 무관용 원칙 및 정당방위 수사학 | 논리적 인과관계](https://img.youtube.com/vi/x02lfnLqnU8/mqdefault.jpg)
C1184 Sätze
#234 [고급영어] 백악관 브리핑 | 캐롤라인 레빗 (백악관 대변인) | 국제 협정 및 양해각서 위반 분석 화법 | 테러 무관용 원칙 및 정당방위 수사학 | 논리적 인과관계
IELTS PrepBusiness EnglishUniversity Students
C12
80 Sätze
Climate Change Debate | Prof. Bruce Pardy | Opposition
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
Wortschatz und Sprechhinweise zu dieser Lektion
Diese Sprechübung auf Niveau C1 basiert auf dem Video „Episode 10: The Inescapable US China Rivalry“. Diese Wörter kommen am häufigsten vor: chinese, china, trump, iran, trade. Dieses Video enthält 509 Sätze und 6707 Wörter zum Nachsprechen. Der gesprochene Teil dauert 54:00. Der Sprecher spricht gleichmäßig mit etwa 124 Wörtern pro Minute – ein angenehmes Tempo fürs Shadowing. 88 % der Wörter gehören zu den 3.000 häufigsten im Englischen; den Rest solltest du dir vor dem Üben ansehen.
Wichtiger Wortschatz in diesem Video
Die 15 anspruchsvollsten Wörter aus dem Video, mit Aussprache und Bedeutung:
| Wort | Aussprache | Bedeutung |
|---|---|---|
| tariff Substantiv | /ˈtæɹəf/ | Tarif, Zoll |
| accommodate Verb | /əˈkɑməˌdeɪt/ | machen, endigen |
| containment Substantiv | /kənˈteɪnmənt/ | Eindämmung |
| concession Substantiv | /kənˈsɛʃən/ | Zugeständnis |
| vest Substantiv | /vɛst/ | Weste, Gilet |
| hegemony Substantiv | /hɪˈd͡ʒɛ.mə.ni/ | Hegemonie, Vorherrschaft |
| pivot Substantiv | /ˈpɪv.ɪt/ | Drehpunkt, Angelpunkt |
| catastrophic Adjektiv | /ˌkætəˈstɹɑfɪk/ | Katastrophen- |
| conclude Verb | /kənˈkluːd/ | beenden, schließen |
| dimension Substantiv | /daɪˈmɛn.ʃən/ | Dimension |
| abandon Verb | /əˈbæn.dən/ | aufgeben, verlassen |
| intercourse Substantiv | /ˈɪn.tɚˌkɔɹs/ | Beziehungen, Umgang |
| unwilling Adjektiv | /ʌnˈwɪlɪŋ/ | unwillig |
| cooperate Verb | /kəʊˈɒp.ə.ɹeɪt/ | zusammenarbeiten, kooperieren |
| mortal Adjektiv | /ˈmɔɹ.təl/ | sterblich |
Phrasal Verbs, die du hören wirst
| Wort | Aussprache | Bedeutung |
|---|---|---|
| move forward Verb | vorantreiben, vorwärtstreiben | |
| work out Verb | /ˌwɝk ˈaʊt/ | ausrechnen |
| break out Verb | ausbrechen | |
| come together Verb | /ˈkʌm tʊˈɡɛðɚ/ | zusammenkommen |
| cut off Verb | /ˌkʌt ˈɔf/ [ˌkɐɾ ˈɔf] | abschneiden |
| end up Verb | sich herausstellen, am Ende irgendwo / etwas sein | |
| find out Verb | herausfinden, erfahren | |
| go down Verb | absteigen, hinabsteigen |
Grammatik in diesem Video
Die Strukturen, die der Sprecher am häufigsten verwendet, mit den genauen Worten aus dem Video:
| Struktur | Im Video |
|---|---|
| Present Perfect Continuous have/has been + -ing – eine Handlung, die früher begann und noch andauert | has been asking · has been aiding · we've been talking |
| Present Perfect have/has + Partizip Perfekt – eine vergangene Handlung, die jetzt noch wichtig ist | has set · has failed · has agreed |
| Passiv be + Partizip Perfekt – wichtig ist, was geschieht, nicht wer es tut | were discussed · was spent · is put |
Aussprache, auf die du achten solltest
Der Sprecher verwendet 31 Kurzformen und abgeschwächte Formen, zum Beispiel you're, I'll, I'm. Sprich sie in der kurzen Form, so wie du sie hörst.
- Die „th“-Laute: threaten /ˈθɹɛt.n̩/, withdraw /wɪðˈdɹɔ/
- Die Laute „sh“ und „zh“: concession /kənˈsɛʃən/, dimension /daɪˈmɛn.ʃən/, foolish /ˈfuː.lɪʃ/, initiate /ɪˈnɪʃ.i.eɪt/, shipment /ˈʃɪpmənt/
- Lange Wörter – auf die Betonung achten: accommodate /əˈkɑməˌdeɪt/, hegemony /hɪˈd͡ʒɛ.mə.ni/, catastrophic /ˌkætəˈstɹɑfɪk/, remarkably /ɹɪˈmɑɹkəbli/, cooperate /kəʊˈɒp.ə.ɹeɪt/
Laute, die Deutschsprachigen schwerfallen:
- /w/ — mit runden Lippen, nicht wie das deutsche „w“ (/v/): unwilling /ʌnˈwɪlɪŋ/, consequence /ˈkɑn.sɪ.kwəns/, weaponry /ˈwɛp.ən.ɹi/, wartime /ˈwɔː(ɹ)taɪm/, withdraw /wɪðˈdɹɔ/
- Stimmhafter Auslaut — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ am Wortende nicht verhärten: conclude /kənˈkluːd/, incentive /ɪnˈsɛntɪv/, oftentimes /ˈɔf.ənˌtaɪmz/, emphasize /ˈɛm.fə.saɪz/, cooperative /kuˈɑp.ɹətɪv/
- /æ/ — offener als „ä“: tariff /ˈtæɹəf/, catastrophic /ˌkætəˈstɹɑfɪk/, abandon /əˈbæn.dən/, catastrophe /kəˈtæstɹəfi/, unacceptable /ˌʌn.ækˈsɛp.tə.bl̩/
So übst du mit diesem Video
- Höre dir das ganze Video einmal an, ohne zu sprechen, und notiere die Wörter, die du nicht kennst.
- Sprich Satz für Satz in normaler Geschwindigkeit nach und wiederhole jeden, bis dein Rhythmus zum Sprecher passt.
- Nimm dich auf und vergleiche mit dem Original; achte dabei auf Wörter wie tariff, accommodate, containment.
Was ist die Shadowing-Technik?
Shadowing ist eine wissenschaftlich fundierte Sprachlerntechnik, die ursprünglich für die professionelle Dolmetscherausbildung entwickelt und durch den Polyglotten Dr. Alexander Arguelles populär gemacht wurde. Die Methode ist einfach aber wirkungsvoll: Du hörst englisches Audio von Muttersprachlern und wiederholst es sofort laut — wie ein Schatten, der dem Sprecher mit nur 1–2 Sekunden Verzögerung folgt. Anders als passives Hören oder Grammatikübungen zwingt Shadowing dein Gehirn und deine Mundmuskulatur, gleichzeitig echte Sprachmuster zu verarbeiten und zu reproduzieren. Studien zeigen, dass es Aussprachegenauigkeit, Intonation, Rhythmus, verbundene Sprache, Hörverständnis und Sprechflüssigkeit signifikant verbessert — was es zu einer der effektivsten Methoden für die IELTS Speaking-Vorbereitung und reale englische Kommunikation macht.