Shadowing-Übung: What If You Lit a Match on Jupiter, Would The Planet Explode? - Englisch Sprechen Lernen mit Video

Übungsmodus wählen

Jeder Modus öffnet einen Übungsraum im Vollbild.

107 Sätze
Wenn Sätze zu kurz oder zu lang sind, klicke auf Edit, um sie anzupassen.
1
What do you think of when you hear the word giant?
2
Niagara Falls, Mount Everest, or maybe the Andromeda galaxy?
3
There are four planets in our solar system that are called giants.
4
The largest of them is Jupiter.
5
To understand its size, imagine this.
6
All the inner planets, namely
7
Mercury, Venus, Mars, and our native
8
Earth, are only 0.4% of the mass of all the planets in the solar system.
9
Do you know how much of the total mass went to Jupiter?
10
71%.
11
That is, Jupiter is many times more massive than any other object in our planetary system.
12
But the most interesting thing is that
13
Jupiter is a ready-made thermonuclear bomb of monstrous power, and not just a piece of stone hanging in space.
14
This means it remains to be blown up properly.
15
The planet belongs to the so-called gas giants.
16
It's mainly composed of hydrogen and helium, just like our sun, which burns due to continuous thermonuclear reactions.
17
What if such a reaction were triggered on Jupiter?
18
If we ignited the combustible gases and dust in Jupiter's atmosphere with an ordinary match,
19
would the planet be engulfed in universal flames and would there be an explosion?
20
In fact, in the atmosphere of Jupiter, about 250,000 such matches are lit every second.
21
Or rather, meteors.
22
They're attracted to the planet from space and burn up in the atmosphere.
23
But this doesn't lead to ignition, because there's no free oxygen on the gas giant.
24
And fire doesn't burn without oxygen.
25
Try lighting a candle and covering it tightly with a glass flask.
26
You'll notice that after a few seconds, it goes out.
27
Because all the oxygen in the flask simply burns up.
28
Hydrogen, which makes up almost 90% of the planet, is explosive only in the presence of oxygen.
29
So we can't start a thermonuclear reaction with a normal match.
30
Jupiter simply doesn't have the kind of fire we're used to seeing on Earth.
31
If it could be set on fire, small meteors would have done so long ago.
32
But matches aren't the most technologically advanced invention of mankind.
33
We could try to start a thermonuclear reaction with something more powerful.
34
For example, a nuclear bomb.
35
In fact, we don't need to detonate a bomb on Jupiter to know what would happen.
36
Over the past 30 years, the planet has experienced such terrible disasters.
37
Even the most powerful nuclear warhead on Earth wouldn't be able to repeat them.
38
In 1994, astronomers, for the first time in history,
39
were able to record the collision of a large cosmic body with a planet in the solar system.
40
From the 16th to the 22nd of July, a veritable apocalypse was taking place on Jupiter.
41
21 fragments of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 hit the gas giant, causing severe surface disturbances.
42
In less than a week, the southern hemisphere of Jupiter was covered with traces of collisions.
43
The biggest disaster occurred on the morning of July 18th, after the largest fragment of the comet hit,
44
A dark spot with a diameter of 7,500 miles appeared on the planet.
45
This is only 450 miles less than the diameter of the Earth.
46
However, Jupiter was unharmed.
47
Astronomers observed explosions of up to 6 million megatons.
48
This is 750 times more powerful than an explosion of all the nuclear weapons that man has managed to create.
49
But the traces of the disaster disappeared from the surface of the giant planet within a week.
50
This isn't the only case of a bombardment of the surface of Jupiter by cosmic bodies.
51
In the year 2009, another object, presumably a comet, collided with the planet.
52
The impact caused a dark spot the size of the Pacific Ocean to appear on the surface.
53
But even this wasn't enough to start a chain thermonuclear reaction.
54
So, even if we sent all the nuclear bombs to Jupiter and detonated them, there would be no apocalypse.
55
However, there is one but.
56
There's a theory on the explosion of giant planets.
57
It says that humans could destroy
58
Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune with their own hands.
59
If you organized a nuclear explosion not on the surface of the planet,
60
but deep inside it, you could start a chain thermonuclear reaction.
61
With that, after the explosion of Jupiter, humanity, in theory, would come to an end.
62
It's all about metallic hydrogen, which is stored under monstrous pressure in the bowels of giant planets.
63
If you're tormented by the question of what the ecological fuel of the future may be, the answer can be found inside hydrogen planets.
64
The fact is that during the transition of solid hydrogen to the usual molecular phase,
65
about 20 times more energy is released than when it's burned.
66
Having a very small fuel block of metallic hydrogen, it would be possible to provide energy to a whole house for several years.
67
A future where terminators live on self-sufficiently for hundreds of years may become a reality.
68
Although the existence of metallic hydrogen was predicted as early as the 1930s,
69
it was only possible to obtain it in extremely small quantities in 2016 by scientists at Harvard University.
70
However, their achievement was rather coldly received in the scientific community.
71
It was only recently that French physicists confirmed that solid hydrogen exists and can be produced on Earth.
72
However, for this, we have to create a pressure of 4 million atmospheres.
73
Let's go back to the explosion of Jupiter.
74
On September 21, 2003, NASA decided to sink the Galileo space probe into the planet's atmosphere.
75
On board the spacecraft were 26 pounds of radioactive plutonium-238,
76
though it only takes 22 pounds to start a chain reaction.
77
According to unconfirmed reports, an explosion occurred inside
78
Jupiter, which left a large black spot on its surface.
79
This is according to the American writer Richard Hoagland.
80
But, in fact, as NASA says, the shadow of the satellite fell into the frame of the telescope,
81
and it has nothing to do with the explosion.
82
At the same time, Richard himself is a supporter of various conspiracy theories, and often publishes provocative articles.
83
So draw your own conclusions.
84
In reality, Jupiter could still be blown up.
85
However, to do this, you would need to send a nuclear bomb the size of the moon to its core.
86
And purely hypothetically, a self-sustaining thermonuclear fusion reaction could occur.
87
From such an explosion, the gas giant would simply be blown apart, and there would be a large-scale catastrophe for the entire solar system.
88
Jupiter's explosion would be similar to a supernova explosion, but on a smaller scale.
89
A huge amount of thermal energy
90
and radiation would be released into outer space solar wind currents would be disrupted
91
and most planets would permanently change their orbits the earth as we know
92
it would cease to exist after the explosion
93
we would lose the ozone layer along with the rest of the atmosphere
94
and inevitably die from cosmic radiation
95
and in the sky for a long time the consequences of the explosion would be visible to the naked eye
96
but there would be no one to see the spectacle.
97
Only one question remains.
98
If Jupiter has so much hydrogen, why doesn't it turn into a star instead of remaining a planet?
99
This is because the mass of the gas giant remains too small for such a transformation.
100
Hydrogen in stars is in a plasma state.
101
That is, it's heated to extreme temperatures due to reactions in the core.
102
Jupiter could be a star if it were 80 times larger.
103
Then the temperature inside the planet would reach 18 million degrees Fahrenheit, and we would see another bright star in the sky.
104
One thing we know for sure, in our lifetime, no matter how hard we try, we won't be able to blow up Jupiter.
105
Therefore, don't be afraid to leave the house because of a supernova explosion.
106
It's better to wait until dark, take a small telescope
107
and look at the largest planet in the solar system with your own eyes and as always thank you for watching

App herunterladen

Alles, was du zum fließenden Sprechen brauchst

KI-AussprachebewertungJeder Satz bewertet
IPA-TrainingJeden Laut meistern
WortschatzBaue deinen Wortschatz auf
VokabelspielSpielend lernen

Gleicher Kanal

FOR YOU

Empfohlenes Video

Wortschatz und Sprechhinweise zu dieser Lektion

Diese Sprechübung basiert auf dem Video „What If You Lit a Match on Jupiter, Would The Planet Explode?“. Diese Wörter kommen am häufigsten vor: Jupiter, planet, explosion, hydrogen, giant. Dieses Video enthält 106 Sätze und 1327 Wörter zum Nachsprechen. Der gesprochene Teil dauert 9:54. Der Sprecher spricht gleichmäßig mit etwa 134 Wörtern pro Minute – ein angenehmes Tempo fürs Shadowing. Nur 78 % der Wörter gehören zu den 3.000 häufigsten im Englischen, der Wortschatz ist also anspruchsvoll.

Wichtiger Wortschatz in diesem Video

15 lernenswerte Wörter aus dem Video, mit Aussprache und Bedeutung:

WortAusspracheBedeutung
explosion Substantiv/ɛkˈsploʊ.ʒən/Explosion
hydrogen Substantiv/ˈhaɪdɹəd͡ʒ(ə)n/Hydrogen, Hydrogenium
atmosphere Substantiv/ˈætməsˌfɪɹ/Atmosphäre
oxygen Substantiv/ˈɑksɪd͡ʒən/Sauerstoff, Oxygen
occur Verb/əˈkɜː/passieren, vorkommen
disaster Substantiv/dɪˈzɑːs.təː/Desaster, Unglück
metallic Adjektiv/məˈtæl.ɪk/metallisch
cosmic Adjektiv/ˈkɑz.mɪk/kosmisch, Raum-
comet Substantiv/ˈkɒmɪt/Komet
radiation Substantiv/ˌɹeɪ.diˈeɪ.ʃən/Strahlung
trace Substantiv/tɹeɪs/aufzeichnen, aufspüren
diameter Substantiv/daɪˈæmɪdɚ/Durchmesser, Diameter
collision Substantiv/kəˈlɪʒn̩/Zusammenstoß, Kollision
telescope Substantiv/ˈtɛl.əˌskoʊp/Teleskop, Fernrohr
apocalypse Substantiv/əˈpɑkəlɪps/Apokalypse

Phrasal Verbs, die du hören wirst

WortAusspracheBedeutung
blow up Verbsprengen, explodieren
go out Verbhinausgehen, herausgehen
make up Verb/ˌmeɪk ˈʌp/wiedergutmachen, kompensieren

Grammatik in diesem Video

Die Strukturen, die der Sprecher am häufigsten verwendet, mit den genauen Worten aus dem Video:

StrukturIm Video
Passiv be + Partizip Perfekt – wichtig ist, was geschieht, nicht wer es tutare called · be blown · were triggered
Present Perfect have/has + Partizip Perfekt – eine vergangene Handlung, die jetzt noch wichtig isthas experienced · has managed
Relativsätze who / which + Satz – eine Zusatzinformation über eine Person oder SacheHydrogen, which makes · hydrogen, which is

Aussprache, auf die du achten solltest

Der Sprecher verwendet 16 Kurzformen und abgeschwächte Formen, zum Beispiel doesn't, don't, aren't. Sprich sie in der kurzen Form, so wie du sie hörst.

  • Die „th“-Laute: thermal /ˈθɜːməl/, thermonuclear /ˌθɜɹ.moʊˈn(j)uk.li.əɹ/
  • Die Laute „sh“ und „zh“: explosion /ɛkˈsploʊ.ʒən/, radiation /ˌɹeɪ.diˈeɪ.ʃən/, collision /kəˈlɪʒn̩/, transition /tɹænˈzɪʃ.ən/, shadow /ˈʃædəʊ̯/
  • Lange Wörter – auf die Betonung achten: radiation /ˌɹeɪ.diˈeɪ.ʃən/, diameter /daɪˈæmɪdɚ/, apocalypse /əˈpɑkəlɪps/, universal /ˌjunəˈvɜɹs(ə)l/, ordinary /ˈɔɹdɪnɛɹi/

Laute, die Deutschsprachigen schwerfallen:

  • /w/ — mit runden Lippen, nicht wie das deutsche „w“ (/v/): consequence /ˈkɑn.sɪ.kwəns/, quantity /ˈkwɑn(t)ɪti/
  • Stimmhafter Auslaut — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ am Wortende nicht verhärten: pound /ˈpaʊ̯nd/, naked /ˈneɪkɪd/, observe /əbˈzɜːv/, probe /pɹoʊb/, organize /ˈɔɹɡənaɪz/
  • /æ/ — offener als „ä“: atmosphere /ˈætməsˌfɪɹ/, metallic /məˈtæl.ɪk/, diameter /daɪˈæmɪdɚ/, fragment /ˈfɹæɡmənt/, transition /tɹænˈzɪʃ.ən/

So übst du mit diesem Video

  1. Höre dir das ganze Video einmal an, ohne zu sprechen, und notiere die Wörter, die du nicht kennst.
  2. Sprich Satz für Satz in normaler Geschwindigkeit nach und wiederhole jeden, bis dein Rhythmus zum Sprecher passt.
  3. Nimm dich auf und vergleiche mit dem Original; achte dabei auf Wörter wie explosion, hydrogen, atmosphere.

Was ist die Shadowing-Technik?

Shadowing ist eine wissenschaftlich fundierte Sprachlerntechnik, die ursprünglich für die professionelle Dolmetscherausbildung entwickelt und durch den Polyglotten Dr. Alexander Arguelles populär gemacht wurde. Die Methode ist einfach aber wirkungsvoll: Du hörst englisches Audio von Muttersprachlern und wiederholst es sofort laut — wie ein Schatten, der dem Sprecher mit nur 1–2 Sekunden Verzögerung folgt. Anders als passives Hören oder Grammatikübungen zwingt Shadowing dein Gehirn und deine Mundmuskulatur, gleichzeitig echte Sprachmuster zu verarbeiten und zu reproduzieren. Studien zeigen, dass es Aussprachegenauigkeit, Intonation, Rhythmus, verbundene Sprache, Hörverständnis und Sprechflüssigkeit signifikant verbessert — was es zu einer der effektivsten Methoden für die IELTS Speaking-Vorbereitung und reale englische Kommunikation macht.

Shadowing-Technik: die vollständige Schritt-für-Schritt-Anleitung lesen →