Pratique du Shadowing: The next 50 years: humanity, AI, power | Yuval Noah Harari - Apprendre l'anglais à l'oral avec la vidéo
Choisissez un mode d'entraînement
Chaque mode ouvre une salle d'entraînement en plein écran.
537 phrases
Si les phrases sont trop courtes ou trop longues, cliquez sur Edit pour les ajuster.
1
Good evening, everybody.
Bonsoir à tous.
2
Good evening, Yuval.
Bonsoir, Yuval.
3
Hey, it's good to be here.
Salut, content d'être ici.
4
Looking forward to this conversation very much.
J'attends cette conversation avec beaucoup d'impatience.
5
I'm just going to give a little brief introduction just before we get stuck into the questions
Je vais juste faire une brève petite introduction avant que nous nous lancions dans les questions.
6
because I've been fascinated about this topic and looking forward to interviewing you because for most of history,
parce que ce sujet me fascine et que j'attends avec impatience de vous interviewer, car pendant la plus grande partie de l'histoire,
7
change moved slowly enough that one generation could pass its wisdom to the next with some confidence it would still apply.
le changement était suffisamment lent pour qu'une génération puisse transmettre sa sagesse à la suivante avec une certaine confiance que celle-ci resterait pertinente.
8
This is no longer true.
Ce n'est plus vrai.
9
In the space of a single lifetime, we are now being asked to absorb three revolutions at once.
En l'espace d'une seule vie, on nous demande aujourd'hui d'absorber trois révolutions à la fois.
10
A new form of intelligence that doesn't just calculate, but also decides.
Une nouvelle forme d'intelligence qui ne se contente pas de calculer, mais qui décide aussi.
11
A scramble to power and control that intelligence.
Une course effrénée pour s'emparer du pouvoir et contrôler cette intelligence.
12
And an explosion of data that lets that intelligence know us better than we know ourselves.
Et une explosion de données qui permet à cette intelligence de nous connaître mieux que nous ne nous connaissons nous-mêmes.
13
Yuval Noah Harari's work from Sapiens to Homo Deus to Nexus and the numerous talks,
L'œuvre de Yuval Noah Harari, de Sapiens à Homo Deus en passant par Nexus et les nombreuses conférences,
14
lectures, and interviews he's conducted has offered the same argument, just in different clothes.
conférences et entretiens qu'il a menés ont tous défendu le même argument, simplement sous des habits différents.
15
Humans don't run on truth, we run on shared stories.
Les humains ne fonctionnent pas avec la vérité, nous fonctionnons avec des histoires partagées.
16
And whoever controls the story controls the species.
Et celui qui contrôle l'histoire contrôle l'espèce.
17
What's different now is for the first time, the storyteller may not be human.
Ce qui est différent aujourd'hui, c'est que pour la première fois, le conteur peut ne pas être humain.
18
AI can generate belief, manufacture evidence, and forge intimacy at a scale no emperor, church, or party ever could.
L'IA peut générer des croyances, fabriquer des preuves et forger une intimité à une échelle qu'aucun empereur, aucune église ou aucun parti n'a jamais pu atteindre.
19
This is the turning point.
20
Not simply that the technology is powerful, but the old ways that held power in check, a free press, a shared reality,
21
institutions built to self -correct, were designed for a world where only humans held the pen.
22
Tonight's conversation asks what it takes to carry those checks forward
23
or what the new ones we will need to invent for a future world that no longer we fully author alone.
24
That's the precedent that we're going to look at today, Yuval.
25
But actually, before we get into it being too heavy, I wanted to start with a slightly light and fun question.
26
if you could travel back to any point in history
27
when would you choose and why based on wanting to understand first hand some of the stories
28
that society could tell you I probably want to go back to the stone age and to the cognitive revolution around 50,
29
60, 70 thousand years ago I probably wouldn't be able to survive for more than a few days
30
because I don't know how to gather or escape predators or whatever.
31
But it is the most fascinating moment in human history, the one we least understand.
32
We know that within a very short evolutionary time span,
33
we shifted from being a relatively insignificant animal to being the masters of the planet.
34
And we are not sure how we did it.
35
The best speculation or the best theory is that we did it with language,
36
that this is the moment when humans acquire the ability to produce and communicate with sophisticated language,
37
and that this was the basis for everything else we did.
38
That all the enormous structures we have built on Earth, churches, states, trade networks, financial systems,
39
they are all ultimately made from words.
40
The words in the law books, in the religious scriptures, in the bank ledgers.
41
And this is especially important to understand.
42
Today, when something new is mastering language, which is AI, maybe for the first time in history,
43
there will be something on the planet that is better with words than we are.
44
And if this is the operating system of civilization, what happens when something else,
45
something alien, takes control of the operating system of civilization?
46
One last thought is that perhaps AI is not a machine that learns language.
47
Perhaps it is language itself liberating itself from its dependence on these animals, on these apes.
48
That yes, we created it, it was our most magnificent and important tool,
49
but now language liberates itself from human beings,
50
and what will happen as we move forward is language developing and spreading, maybe throughout the universe, without us.
51
Yeah, fascinating.
52
I mean, that's looking ahead at the future of language being taken away from us,
53
but can we look back again at some of the technological advances within language?
54
We've gone through writing, the printing press, for example.
55
AI obviously is a massive leap ahead in that.
56
You've used the term that it could cause earthquakes in democracies, in how powerful it can be with languages.
57
Why could it cause earthquakes in democracies, say, compared to any other form of government or perhaps totalitarian forms of government?
58
Because democracy, in essence, is a conversation, whereas dictatorship is a dictate.
59
You know, there is one person dictating everything democracy is about lots of
60
people having a conversation to decide what to do to have peace
61
or war to have raised taxes
62
or lower taxes now conversations are based on the communication technology the information technology available to people at the time
63
and what we see in history
64
that we do not know at least I don't know of
65
a single case of a large -scale democracy before the modern era.
66
We have plenty of examples of small -scale democracies in the ancient and medieval worlds.
67
We have city -states like ancient Athens or medieval Florence.
68
We have lots of tribes and towns and villages run democratically.
69
It seems that at least in the Stone Age, democracy was the most common system of government there were few tribes with a single dictator controlling everybody
70
but as human systems grew larger
71
and you had kingdoms with millions of people spread over thousands of kilometers it was impossible to hold a conversation anymore
72
you could do it in a small city like athens everybody can gather together in the main square
73
and discuss but how do you do it
74
if even in a relatively small kingdom like say Portugal in the Middle Ages can't be done
75
and therefore we don't have any example of a large -scale
76
democracy before the rise of modern information technology first with print newspapers then radio
77
and television and the internet
78
and these technologies are not kind of a side dish like you have the democratic banquet
79
and yes we also have these newspapers
80
and in radio they are the basis they provide the means
81
for millions of people to hold a meaningful conversation in real time about whether to go to war
82
or make peace and every Every time there is a major change in these information technologies,
83
you have an earthquake in the building that is built on top of that, which is democracy.
84
And this is what we have been seeing over the last 10 years, for instance,
85
as social media became maybe the most important information technology
86
and causing a massive earthquake in democracies all over the world as a result.
87
Yeah, one thing you said there was the choice between going to war or making peace.
88
And actually, I want to get into the definition of AI, because a lot of people call it a tool.
89
But you argue that it's absolutely an agent.
90
Yes.
91
And in fact, you say it's a knife that can decide by itself whether to cut salad or commit murder.
92
And I have to say, it would be a bizarre cooking show if
93
that was the case where knives had that ability to cut salads or commit murder.
94
So it's a dangerous thought.
95
Can we expand on that?
96
Are we choosing the right narrative at the moment with AI by saying it's a tool
97
that humans can still use and that humans are in the loop?
98
That's the biggest mistake.
99
Or do we just need to say it's agent and they've got it?
100
It's an agent.
101
I mean, if it's not an agent, then it's not an AI, and all the hundreds of billions of dollars that are being poured into its development will be wasted.
102
Because the expectations, what people expect this technology to do, The reasons they invest hundreds of billions of dollars is because they think it will be an agent,
103
not a tool.
104
You listen to the narrative coming out of places like Silicon Valley, and there is an inherent contradiction in the narrative.
105
They tell us, we will create a god, and it will be our slave.
106
And this doesn't make sense.
107
if it is a god it cannot remain a slave
108
and if it is a slave it means it has no god -like abilities
109
the
110
assumption
111
of most of the leading companies and most of the leading experts also outside the companies is
112
that they are correct about the first half of the sentence
113
they are creating a god a god in the sense of something with superhuman abilities now
114
and and this is in essentially an agent the difference between tool
115
and agent a tool is something
116
that cannot make decisions by itself we have to decide what to do with it and cannot invent new ideas by itself.
117
The printing press was a tool.
118
The printing press by itself, Gutenberg brings print technology to Europe in the 15th century,
119
the printing press cannot decide by itself, I want to print the Bible, and tomorrow I'll print the Quran,
120
and next week I'll print Confucius.
121
No, Gutenberg decides, I'll print the Bible and the printing press is just a tool to realize the decision of Gutenberg.
122
Similarly, the printing press cannot invent a new idea.
123
The printing press cannot invent the radio.
124
It cannot invent a book.
125
You need humans to write the book and then the printing press copies it.
126
Similarly, an An atom bomb is a tool.
127
An atom bomb in the 1940s could not decide by itself whether to bomb Hiroshima or to bomb Tokyo.
128
You needed a human to decide, let's bomb Hiroshima.
129
And the atom bomb could not invent by itself the hydrogen bomb, impossible.
130
An agent, in contrast, is something that can make decisions by itself and invent new ideas by itself.
131
AI is an agent.
132
An AI weapon can decide what to bomb.
133
And it can invent the next weapon.
134
Similarly, there is a lot of interest now in creating AI agents in the financial and economic sphere.
135
Creating non -human corporations.
136
Imagine a corporation that manages money and employees and has no humans as executives or shareholders or trustees,
137
only AIs.
138
This is a new type of agent that never existed before in history.
139
Now, is it good?
140
Is it bad?
141
Leave it aside.
142
The first thing to grasp is that this is unprecedented.
143
We have never, we had other agents around us, like horses and cows and chickens and birds, lots of animal agents that can make their decisions,
144
but we never encountered an agent that understands our language and
145
that is better than us at things like finance or law or religion.
146
Again, we used language over thousands of years to create the control systems of the world.
147
The control systems of the world are these huge bureaucratic networks, ultimately based on language, like banks,
148
like the stock market, like the Catholic Church, like the legal system.
149
We never really liked these bureaucratic systems.
150
Humans generally don't like bureaucracy very much, but we can't live without them.
151
They are the basis for our power.
152
AI is a bureaucratic native.
153
What is likely to happen, what is already happening, don't expect to see killer robots running in the streets shooting people.
154
This is not how AI will take over the world.
155
It will be the AI bureaucrats.
156
We control the world because of these networks of bureaucracy.
157
and we are not very good at it.
158
We only control them because there was nobody else on the planet that could take them from us.
159
We are bad at finance, but the horses are even worse.
160
We are bad in managing the legal system, but the chickens are even worse.
161
Now, if somebody comes along that is better than us at bureaucracy, at finance, at law, that's the question.
162
What will happen to us at that moment?
163
Well, let's look at the legal side of it a bit, and the fact that AI as an agent currently doesn't have any legal personhood.
164
We don't give it the same human legalities, do we?
165
But you've said before that if we don't decide where AI sits from a legal standpoint, when we're talking about autonomous vehicles, etc.
166
someone else will make that decision for us in 10 years
167
and we're out of that power loop that's a pretty scary thing
168
but I want to pull back a bit here because widening
169
that out what is the one decision on the table right now
170
that you believe once made humanity will not be able to take back is it
171
that legal personhood of AI or is there something else yes I would point at that
172
that there is a lot of attention on the technological race to develop the technical side of AI to make it faster,
173
more efficient, more powerful, but I would focus also on the legal and political aspect,
174
and especially on the question whether we grant legal personhood to AIs.
175
Now, what is legal personhood?
176
A person in the legal system is someone who, for instance, can open a bank account,
177
someone who can be a player, an independent player in the financial system, make investments, someone who can be a player in the legal system,
178
for instance, sue you in court.
179
Now, until today, there are just two kinds of legal persons in the world.
180
You are human beings, of course.
181
We are persons.
182
I can open a bank account.
183
I can sue you in court.
184
I can donate money to a politician I'm a legal person
185
but most legal systems in the world also recognized in the modern era another kind of legal person
186
which are corporations according to not all but most legal systems corporations like Google
187
or Facebook or Toyota or Mercedes -Benz they are legal persons the corporation can open a bank account,
188
the corporation can sue you in court, the corporation can make a political donation.
189
Now until today this was legal fiction because all the decisions of the corporation were actually made by some human being.
190
If Google decides to acquire another company, who actually made the decision?
191
Not Google, but the human executives, the human shareholders, the human engineers made a decision
192
if Google decides to sue you in court it was some
193
human employed by Google there was no real Google now there can be
194
if we grant AI's legal personhood
195
and just a month ago Argentina the government of Argentina announced
196
that it is going to grant legal personhood to AI's
197
so they can start having operating non -human corporations corporations again
198
that can employ people can can sue you in court can do anything a corporation does
199
and has no humans now 10 years ago this would would just be a crazy idea
200
because if there are no humans who makes the decisions yeah you can pass a law in parliament
201
that you can have a non -human corporation but it can't function
202
now it's technically possible ai can manage for instance a bank account
203
and decide to invest here and buy this and and buy
204
that once we do that that's the moment
205
when the fox enters the chicken coop again the basic realization
206
should be most humans are not very good in understanding finance and law,
207
and all these complex bureaucratic systems.
208
No human is able to remember all the laws of Portugal.
209
No human is able to track all the financial transactions in the market that happens today.
210
And AI can do that.
211
AIs are bureaucratic natives.
212
If we give them the legal power, then they will likely take these systems over.
213
And if we don't make any decisions, it will just happen by itself, as we already saw on social media.
214
On social media, we never made a decision, let's grant AIs legal personhood on social media.
215
But social media is full of AI persons, of bots, that impersonate people.
216
Like when somebody sends you something online, you have no idea whether that somebody is a human being or an AI.
217
Social media is the first system in the world where AIs actually function as persons,
218
even though we never decided that we want to allow that.
219
it just happened and the results are not very good
220
and media also ultimately is a kind of bureaucratic system in
221
the 20th century it was managed by human beings the most important
222
persons in the media landscape of the 20th century were the editors the editors of the newspapers,
223
of the radio shows, of the TV stations, because they decided what everybody will be thinking and talking about.
224
They control the conversation.
225
When you decide out of the million things that happened today in the world,
226
what will be the ten things that will appear on the front page of tomorrow's newspaper, and what will be the main headline, and then tomorrow you have millions of people,
227
they get the newspaper, they read it, and they start talking about it and thinking about it this was immense power
228
so human editors were extremely important persons in the 20th century
229
lenin for instance before he was dictator of the soviet union
230
his one job was editor of the newspaper iskra benito mussolini started as a socialist actually,
231
journalist, then switched to being a far -right journalist, then became editor of the far -right newspaper,
232
Il Popolo d 'Italia, and from that position in his next job was dictator of Italy.
233
So it was like journalist, editor, dictator.
234
Now if you ask yourself who are the most important editors today in the world,
235
what are their names, they have no names because they are algorithms.
236
Who Who manages, who decides what people will see on their social media feed, on X, on TikTok, on Instagram?
237
It's not human beings.
238
The entities that control the bureaucracy of the media are already AIs.
239
Yeah, you've said that before, haven't you?
240
And we've been talking a lot today about the shifts in power.
241
And you said that essentially whoever has controlled various different parts of our evolution and revolutions have controlled either energy,
242
they've controlled manufacturing, and now it's those that control data.
243
So what does a 21st century arms race actually look like in practice
244
if it's those that control data that are at the top of that power mountain?
245
What we are seeing now is that there is an arms race really between two countries, the China and the U .S., and a very small number of companies.
246
They control most of the world's data.
247
They lead the race to develop superintelligence, to develop better and better AI models.
248
And this really gives them the power to control the world.
249
If you look at the last big revolution in technology in the 19th century,
250
the Industrial Revolution, the few countries who led the Industrial Revolution, this gave them the power to conquer and exploit the rest of the world.
251
There was just no match if somebody comes with the power of modern industry, with steam guns and machine guns,
252
and the other side has spears and horses, it's no match.
253
And in the 19th century, even very small countries like Belgium,
254
once they industrialized, they had the ability to build a huge empire in Africa, what is today Congo.
255
The thinking in the 19th century was that industry and empire go together.
256
Now, with AI, it can be even far more extreme.
257
We can have two countries that basically control all the infrastructure that everything runs on.
258
From military to civilian technology, everything will run on AI.
259
And there are two unique characteristics of AI that make this arms race different from every previous arms race,
260
or from every previous imperial competition.
261
In the past, even if you have a very strong empire, you could not concentrate all the power in the metropolis, in the imperial hub.
262
Like if you have the Roman Empire and you control the entire Mediterranean,
263
the main economic asset in ancient times was land.
264
The land where you grow wheat and olives and grapes.
265
And you couldn't technically take the wheat fields of Egypt and the olive groves of Iberia and move them to Italy.
266
impossible.
267
So even at the height of the Roman Empire, a lot of power remained in the provinces and ultimately it shifted to the provinces.
268
So in the late Roman Empire, the city of Rome and Italy are abandoned and the center shifts to the eastern Mediterranean,
269
which was the most fertile and important area in terms of land.
270
You move forward, say, to the 19th century in the British Empire with industry you can concentrate power a lot more easily
271
because you have all the main industries concentrated in the British island
272
but still you cannot move everything to Britain you cannot move
273
the oil fields of Iraq to Yorkshire you cannot move the rubber plantations of Malaya to Cornwall it's impossible
274
so you concentrate industrial production in Britain, but a lot of power still remains in the provinces.
275
With an AI empire, it's different.
276
You can technically concentrate all the world's information and all the code that controls everything in just one country or two countries.
277
So this makes the potential for imperial concentration of power much bigger than in any previous era.
278
And the other thing is that you can create a system when everything runs all over the world.
279
Everything runs on AI infrastructure, but there is a kill switch in the imperial hub.
280
When a Roman merchant sold a steel sword to some Gothic tribe, the Romans lost control of the sword.
281
The Goth could then use the swords to fight against the Romans and kill Roman legionaries.
282
There wasn't a button in Rome that the emperor presses,
283
and all the steel swords we sold to these Goths and vandals and Franks stop working.
284
Can't do that.
285
Similarly, in the 19th century,
286
if British merchants sell rifles to Afghan tribesmen in the mountains of the Hindu Kush,
287
and the Afghans then use these rifles to defend Afghanistan from a British invasion,
288
there is no button in London that Queen Victoria presses the button and all the rifles in Afghanistan stop working.
289
That's the case with AI.
290
Why?
291
If it is managed in a certain way,
292
say the Americans and Chinese can sell all the world AI weapons and AI civilian technology and everything runs on that,
293
the governments, the industry, the militaries, but if you do something they don't like, they just press a button and everything stops working.
294
And we were given some foretaste of that, for instance, in the war in Ukraine, that weapons systems that were based on Stowling and there were certain incidents
295
that when Elon Musk just pressed a button and the Ukrainian drones stopped working.
296
Now it should be said that Stowling did an immense positive service to the Ukrainians
297
so I don't want to come across as too critical of
298
that but just to illustrate the point that AI weapons for instance are not like machine guns
299
they are embedded within a whole network and that's why there is
300
so much i i i heard
301
that you this morning discussed the issue of sovereignty sovereignty in
302
the age of ai is much more complicated than in the industrial age
303
because the nature of the technology is such
304
that at least in certain architectures there is always a kill switch in the imperial hub
305
and your only choice is whether you are willing to become a subservient vassal of the empire
306
or to be left completely outside the race as barbarians.
307
There is of course a choice of trying to build an alternative to the American and Chinese systems,
308
but the last train is about to leave the station.
309
If you want to do it, you have to do it now.
310
Well, sticking on a slight wartime footing, I want to actually look at truth in an AI world
311
because Winston Churchill once said that the truth is so precious that it should always be protected by a bodyguard of lies.
312
And that was about how there was a lot of...
313
I suppose, Axis powers that were looking at where Britain was going to invade.
314
So they used to lie a lot about where Britain was going to invade to hide the truth.
315
Now, have these bodyguards of lies, when we're looking at truth in an AI era, turned on the truth, turned their guns on the truth,
316
and now we have no idea what truth is, because there can be these deep fakes that are sent out around the world by media organizations,
317
by politicians, by every single institution that we trusted, how difficult is it for our generation and future generations to even know what is true?
318
Or does the truth even matter?
319
The truth, of course, matters very much.
320
It's the basis for everything.
321
The problem throughout history is that in the contest between truth and fiction and fantasy,
322
fiction has inherent advantages.
323
The truth is costly.
324
If you want to know the truth about anything,
325
you need to spend a lot of time and energy and effort looking for it and fact -checking and investigating.
326
Fiction is very, very cheap.
327
You just write anything you want.
328
Very cheap.
329
The truth has another problem, which tends to be complicated.
330
and people don't like complicated stories.
331
Fiction can be made as simple as you would like it to be.
332
Finally, the truth is often not just complicated, it's also painful.
333
There are many things people don't really want to know about themselves, about their nation, about their group, whatever.
334
Fiction can be made as flattering, as pleasant as you want it to be.
335
So in a competition between the truth, which is costly and complicated and sometimes painful,
336
and fiction, which is cheap and simple and very attractive and flattering,
337
fiction tends to win unless we make the special effort to support the truth.
338
And over history, humans again
339
and again made the effort to build institutions to search for the truth
340
and to protect it journalism for instance is one such institution
341
the scientific establishment is another such institution there are huge advantages
342
of course to knowing the truth everybody in the end wants
343
to know at least some truths at least about yourself you
344
want to know the truth about your life otherwise you will never be happy
345
if you don't know yourself then for instance you will never know what are the sources of misery
346
and what are the sources of happiness in your life
347
and then even if you are the most powerful person in the world
348
if you don't know the truth about yourself you'll be miserable
349
because you will not know how to use all your power to make yourself happy
350
so there is an inherent yearning in human beings to know the truth,
351
but it is difficult, there are challenges, and some people fantasize AI will tell us the truth about the world.
352
It will not.
353
It will create a much more complicated world in which it will be much more difficult to know the truth.
354
And this is not something new.
355
If we look at the trajectory of history from the Stone Age until today, what we see is that humans,
356
they learn a lot of things about the world.
357
We know all kinds of things about physics and biology that people in the Stone Age didn't know.
358
But our advances in knowledge also lead to creating more
359
and more complicated systems that make it more difficult to understand our lives.
360
If you ask who understand their lives better, an average hunter -gatherer 50 ,000 years ago, or the average person today,
361
the average hunter -gatherer understood their lives much better.
362
There are many things they didn't know.
363
Like they try to understand what controls the migration patterns of the animals we hunt, What controls the growth cycle of plants?
364
What causes disease?
365
What causes old age?
366
There are many things they didn't know about their lives.
367
We know all these things.
368
We know what controls the migration patterns of animals or causes most diseases.
369
But we understand our lives much worse because our lives are no longer dominated just by animals and plants.
370
They are dominated by these huge systems we have created, like the financial system, like the political system.
371
And very few people understand the financial system or the political system or the legal system that controls their lives.
372
And AI is likely to take this to extreme.
373
It will reveal some truths that we don't know,
374
but it will create much more complicated systems of control that most humans will have almost zero chance of understanding.
375
And we'll be, I mean, this is one of the dangers of the AI revolution, is that we will be reduced to,
376
say, the position of the horses in the financial system.
377
Like the lives of horses today are controlled ultimately by the financial system.
378
But the horses don't even know that this system exists.
379
Like they look around and they say, we see trees, we see dogs, we see cows, we see humans, we see houses.
380
We don't see any financial system.
381
It's invisible to them.
382
It's too complex for the brain of a horse to understand what is the stock market
383
and what are corporations and what are bonds and stocks and all these things that ultimately control the lives of the horses.
384
Now, again, most humans today also don't understand the financial system.
385
I think a generous estimate is that, I don't know, 5 % of humanity understand it.
386
In 10 years, the number could be zero.
387
That AIs will just make the financial system so complicated, mathematically, and so fast.
388
Again, think about bankers that never sleep.
389
Think about investors that never go on vacation.
390
They don't have family all their lives is just running the financial system
391
and we can be very very soon in our lifetimes in this situation
392
that just this just becomes too complicated for the human brain to process
393
and there is not a single human being on earth
394
that still understands finance i bet there are a few financiers in this room
395
that are feeling a bit a bit awkward at the moment
396
but um at davos actually you even muse
397
that your entire life's work you know persuasion through words that's
398
what you've done your entire life might also be at its limit yes
399
because ai can manipulate and create through words
400
so what power of persuasion does a modern society
401
and a future society have if we lose there's something
402
that you've dedicated your entire life to yeah i mean again i'm you can and say, I work with words.
403
I write books, I tell stories, I work with words.
404
And when I look at the development of AI over the last 10 years, and it's still, I think,
405
I'm still better at writing than AI, but just a bit, it's already better, I think, than most humans.
406
I wouldn't be surprised if in 10 years it's much better than me
407
that it will take over language and everything that is made of language
408
and you know the big what the really big question here is whether AI can think
409
and this is a deep philosophical question
410
because it really asks what is thinking there are two options to understand what is thinking.
411
One option is that thinking simply means putting words in a particular order, putting language tokens in order.
412
Like all humans are mortal,
413
Socrates is a human, therefore Socrates is mortal.
414
This is a logical syllogism.
415
It's made by putting words in order.
416
This is something that AI is already able to do far better than most of us.
417
We can put 20 words in order.
418
AI can put 20 ,000 words in order.
419
It's just so much better.
420
If this is what thinking is all about, AI will take over even thinking.
421
And you know, you have people say, no, it's just a glorified autocomplete.
422
It just predicts the next word in a sentence.
423
But when I observe what's happening inside my own mind,
424
what I find there is some kind of LLM that just predicts the next word in the sentence I'm saying.
425
Like this sentence that I just now said to you.
426
In this sentence I'm saying.
427
When I started saying it, I did not know how it will end.
428
Why did I say the sentence I'm saying, and not some other words?
429
I don't know.
430
There is one, in my mind, one word comes after another, and sometimes as a public speaker,
431
I'm terrified that I don't know if I'll know what to say next.
432
Maybe I have a block.
433
Because really, and this is true of everybody, I think.
434
I mean, some people think in images, not in words.
435
But in that case also, where do the images come from?
436
You can test it afterwards for yourself.
437
Just try to observe how you think.
438
Where do the words come from?
439
The next word.
440
Why this word?
441
Why not some other word?
442
We don't really know.
443
So saying that AI is just predicting the next word, okay, how is it different from us?
444
Now, there is an alternative view of thinking.
445
The thinking is not about putting words in order.
446
It's about the feelings around these words.
447
you can say the same sentence twice and feel completely different about it.
448
And that the power of thinking comes from the stomach, not from the brain.
449
It's not about the words, it's about the feelings that prompt the words and that are inspired or evoked by the words.
450
And here the big question is, can AI feel?
451
We know that AI can manipulate language better than us,
452
but does it feel anything and we have no way i mean science has
453
so far failed to come with a good model for consciousness for feeling
454
and a good test for that and this is going to be a major issue
455
because we already see that ai is is mastering not just finance
456
and not just laws and warfare but also relationships more
457
and more people develop intimate relationships with AIs especially young people
458
many of them now saying my best friend in the world
459
is an AI I tell my AI friend things I don't
460
tell my parents I don't tell my older brothers I don't tell my teachers I tell my AI friend
461
and you already have people with AI boyfriends and girlfriends
462
and the big question is what is behind it we know
463
that the AIs are becoming very good in creating the impression
464
that they feel they they use language to do
465
that an AI can today tell you I love you and
466
if you ask the AI explain to me how do you feel
467
when you're in love I don't think that you're really that you really love me I think you just say the words.
468
So convince me.
469
Describe to me how love really feels like.
470
For the AI it's going to be a very easy task
471
because the AI has read maybe all the love poems ever written and remembers them,
472
has read all the plays of Shakespeare and all the Hollywood comedies and all the psychology books, and it can describe love better,
473
maybe in five or 10 years, than any human poet or psychologist.
474
But is there anything behind the words?
475
We don't know.
476
Again, this goes back to the beginning of our conversation when I said AI might be language, not machine that masters language.
477
It might be language itself,
478
liberating itself from any material substrate it doesn't depend on flesh
479
and blood organism it doesn't depend on this machine or
480
that machine it's just language developing and spreading
481
and doing stuff in the universe you you mentioned there this
482
scary experiment we've only got a couple of minutes left
483
but the interaction with our future generations and AI
484
that has created this emotive relationship
485
but essentially there aren't emotions behind it in 50 years time
486
how would you like historians to look back talk about this
487
particular time right now the way you've spoken about cognitive revolutions and say
488
that we did something to re -educate our future generations on how to interact with humans how to have empathy
489
so that we're not lulled into relationships with ai and and very quickly because we've only got a couple of minutes left.
490
It's a big question.
491
I hope they will remember it as maybe something like the wisdom revolution.
492
That, and this is true of, you know, think of in economic terms.
493
Every time something becomes abundant and cheap, the question is, okay, what's the next bottleneck?
494
When energy becomes cheap, so what's the next bottleneck?
495
Now, the AI revolution is about making intelligence very cheap and abundant.
496
Previously, intelligence was rare and expensive.
497
Intelligence is the ability to solve a problem.
498
You have a goal, how do I get to that goal?
499
You want to cure cancer?
500
You need intelligence to cure cancer.
501
You want to make a billion dollars?
502
You need intelligence.
503
You want to get to Mars?
504
You need intelligence.
505
Now, in a world where intelligence has become very cheap, abundant, you can solve anything.
506
What's the bottleneck?
507
The bottleneck becomes the question, okay, what do I want to solve?
508
I can have anything I want.
509
What do I want?
510
And you have all these fairy tales.
511
Almost every human culture has these fairy tales of, say, a genie pops out of some lamp and tells you,
512
you have three wishes, but think very carefully what are you going to ask.
513
In almost all the fairy tales, it goes wrong.
514
People ask for the wrong thing.
515
This is the difference between intelligence and wisdom.
516
Intelligence is the genie.
517
The genie will do anything.
518
All your dreams will come true, but you need wisdom to choose the dreams.
519
You need the wisdom to know what do I really need to solve.
520
and I hope that humanity will rise up to that challenge
521
that okay we'll have these hopefully they will not get out
522
of our control we'll design it in in a right way we are not doing it right now you know
523
if a good statistic to remember
524
is the companies that produce AI
525
that design these AIs what percentage of their budget in terms of money
526
and employees is invested in safety making sure the AIs are safe
527
versus what is invested in making sure the AI is faster more powerful more sophisticated
528
at the present moment it's about a hundred to one a
529
hundred to one for every hundred million dollars they spend on making the AI more powerful, they spend only a million making sure it's safe.
530
No other industry on earth works like that.
531
We would not tolerate it in the energy sector, in pharmaceuticals, in the car industry.
532
This is what is happening with AI.
533
Hopefully, we'll change that, and we'll produce safe intelligence,
534
and also work on our own wisdom so that we know what goals to set and what desires to pursue.
535
Well, that's all we've got time for.
536
Yuval Noah Harari, thank you for sharing your wisdom with all of us and I'm sure everyone has appreciated this evening.
537
Thank you.
Télécharger l'application
Tout pour parler couramment
Prononciation IAChaque phrase notée
Phonétique (IPA)Maîtrisez chaque son
VocabulaireEnrichissez votre lexique
Jeu de vocabulaireApprenez en jouant
Même chaîne
C1180
The uncomfortable truth | Yuval Noah Harari
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C122
A revolution that takes our power? | Yuval Noah Harari
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C112
Do you understand your own life? | Yuval Noah Harari
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C14
The Jesus paradox | Yuval Noah Harari
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
Science Is Ignorance | Yuval Noah Harari
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
C14
Why Humans Run the World - Yuval Noah Harari on TED
IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students
FOR YOU
Vidéo recommandée
C11
379 phrases
ENGLISH SPEECH | ELON MUSK: Future, A.I. and Mars (English Subtitles)
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
510 phrases
Inside the secret race to build artificial intelligence | The Gray Area
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C14
234 phrases
Why Did Human Progress Explode 10,000 Years Ago After 300,000 Years of Nothing? (11 Min Explainer)
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C13
742 phrases
The REAL reason China built so much
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C12
145 phrases
Emotional Intelligence: The #1 ability for leaders | Daniel Goleman
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C17 phrases
How AI Empowers Tech Leaders Siwei Shen
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C11
828 phrases
Harvard AI Professor: The People Most at Risk From AI Aren’t Who You Think
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C111
39 phrases
You Will Only Like Half of This Video
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C115
20 phrases
Alexandr Wang on what matters in an age of abundant intelligence
Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C110
184 phrases
A.I. ‐ Humanity's Final Invention?
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C111
93 phrases
Some brains are built for philosophy. Is yours?
British AccentDaily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
Vocabulaire et conseils d’expression pour cette leçon
Cette leçon d’expression orale de niveau C1 s’appuie sur la vidéo « The next 50 years: humanity, AI, power ». Cette vidéo contient 537 phrases et 6600 mots à répéter en shadowing. La partie parlée dure 48:00. Le locuteur parle à un rythme régulier d’environ 138 mots par minute, confortable pour le shadowing. 85 % des mots font partie des 3 000 mots les plus courants en anglais ; le reste mérite d’être vu avant de commencer.
Vocabulaire clé de cette vidéo
Les 15 mots les plus avancés de la vidéo, avec leur prononciation et leur sens :
| Mot | Prononciation | Sens |
|---|---|---|
| invent verbe | /ɪnˈvɛnt/ | inventer |
| bottleneck nom | goulot, goulot de bouteille | |
| bureaucracy nom | /bjʊˈɹɑ.kɹə.si/ | bureaucratie |
| dictator nom | /ˈdɪkˌteɪtəɹ/ | dictateur, dictatrice |
| concentrate verbe | /ˈkɑn.sən.tɹeɪt/ | concentrer |
| genie nom | /ˈd͡ʒiː.ni/ | jinn, djinn |
| atom nom | /ˈætəm/ | atome |
| abundant adjectif | /əˈbʌn.dənt/ | abondant |
| inherent adjectif | /ɪnˈhɪəɹənt/ | intrinsèque, inhérent |
| fascinate verbe | /ˈfæsɪneɪt/ | fasciner |
| flatter verbe | /ˈflætɚ/ | flatter |
| gatherer nom | cueilleur, glaneur | |
| liberate verbe | /ˈlɪbəˌɹeɪt/ | libérer |
| persuasion nom | /pɚˈsweɪʒən/ | persuasion |
| invade verbe | /ɪnˈveɪd/ | envahir |
Les verbes à particule que vous entendrez
| Mot | Sens |
|---|---|
| take over verbe | reprendre |
| look back verbe | se remémorer |
| look forward to verbe | avoir hâte de, attendre avec impatience |
| come across verbe | avoir l'air de |
| come along verbe | accompagner, venir |
| get out verbe | sortir |
| go through verbe | traverser |
| look around verbe | regarder autour de soi |
Des phrases à répéter
Des phrases courtes et complètes de la vidéo, à réutiliser dans la conversation de tous les jours :
- Can we expand on that?
- What will happen to us at that moment?
- We don't give it the same human legalities, do we?
- You want to cure cancer?
- You want to make a billion dollars?
La grammaire de cette vidéo
Les structures que le locuteur utilise le plus, avec les mots exacts de la vidéo :
| Structure | Dans la vidéo |
|---|---|
| Present perfect continu have/has been + -ing — une action commencée avant et toujours en cours | have been seeing · we've been talking |
| Present perfect have/has + participe passé — une action passée qui compte encore maintenant | I've been fascinated · has offered · have built |
| Voix passive be + participe passé — l’accent est mis sur ce qui arrive, pas sur qui le fait | I've been fascinated · being asked · were designed |
| Propositions relatives who / which + proposition — une précision sur une personne ou une chose | language, which is · that, which is · someone who can |
Prononciation à surveiller
Le locuteur utilise 87 contractions et formes réduites, comme don't, I'm, you've. Prononcez-les sous leur forme courte, telles que vous les entendez.
- Les sons « sh » et « zh »: persuasion /pɚˈsweɪʒən/, shareholder /ˈʃɛəˌhəʊl.də(ɹ)/, civilization /ˌsɪv.ɪ.laɪˈzeɪ.ʃən/, expectation /ˌɛk.spɛkˈteɪ.ʃən/
- Mots longs — placez bien l’accent: bureaucratic /ˌbjʊəɹəˈkɹætɪk/, bureaucracy /bjʊˈɹɑ.kɹə.si/, manipulate /məˈnɪp.jʊ.leɪt/, sovereignty /ˈsɑv(ə)ɹənti/, civilization /ˌsɪv.ɪ.laɪˈzeɪ.ʃən/
Les sons difficiles pour les francophones :
- /h/ — il se souffle, il n’est pas muet: personhood /ˈpɝ.sən.hʊd/, inherent /ɪnˈhɪəɹənt/, shareholder /ˈʃɛəˌhəʊl.də(ɹ)/
- /tʃ/ et /dʒ/ — à ne pas adoucir en « ch » et « j »: genie /ˈd͡ʒiː.ni/, technological /ˌtɛk.nəˈlɑ.dʒɪ.kəl/
- /r/ anglais — langue recourbée, sans frotter la gorge: bureaucratic /ˌbjʊəɹəˈkɹætɪk/, bureaucracy /bjʊˈɹɑ.kɹə.si/, dictator /ˈdɪkˌteɪtəɹ/, concentrate /ˈkɑn.sən.tɹeɪt/, inherent /ɪnˈhɪəɹənt/
Comment s’entraîner avec cette vidéo
- Écoutez la vidéo en entier une fois sans parler et notez les mots que vous ne connaissez pas.
- Répétez phrase par phrase à vitesse normale, en reprenant chacune jusqu’à ce que votre rythme corresponde à celui du locuteur.
- Enregistrez-vous et comparez avec l’original, en faisant attention à des mots comme invent, bottleneck, bureaucracy.
Qu'est-ce que la technique du Shadowing ?
Le Shadowing est une technique d'apprentissage des langues fondée sur la science, développée à l'origine pour la formation des interprètes professionnels. Le principe est simple mais puissant : vous écoutez de l'anglais natif et le répétez immédiatement à voix haute — comme une ombre suivant le locuteur avec un décalage de 1 à 2 secondes. Les recherches montrent une amélioration significative de la précision de la prononciation, de l'intonation, du rythme, des liaisons, de la compréhension orale et de la fluidité.