शैडोइंग अभ्यास: What does a parent owe their child? | The Gray Area - वीडियो के साथ अंग्रेजी बोलना सीखें

अभ्यास मोड चुनें

हर मोड पूरी स्क्रीन का अभ्यास कक्ष खोलता है।

349 वाक्य

यदि वाक्य बहुत छोटे या लंबे हों, तो समायोजित करने के लिए Edit पर क्लिक करें।

Hey, it's Sean.

Today we're bringing you an episode from another podcast we love, Vox's Unexplainable.

It's a show about all the mysteries we haven't solved yet and all the questions we are still struggling to answer.

In this episode, host Noam Hassenfeld and Vox reporter Seagal Samuel debate the ethics of genetic screening.

As technology increasingly gives us the power to shape and influence future lives, Noam and Seagal wrestle with the question,

what exactly does a parent owe a child?

It's a very gray area question and one I think will only become more

and more urgent as we lunge into this very strange, very uncertain future.

Anyway, it's a great episode.

I hope you dig it and I'll see you on the next one.

I am someone who is a little bit obsessed with always trying to do the right thing.

That's Vox reporter Seagal Samuel.

Not just like the good thing, but the most good thing.

And I just found in the past few years that that was really making me kind of pretty unhappy.

Like it was torturing me somewhat.

Because often it's just impossible to optimize moral life, and it's exhausting and misery-inducing to try.

Seagal needed a way out.

So she decided to start an advice column, something she thought could help her with her own ethical dilemmas.

Seagal's column is called Your Mileage May Vary.

And it's pretty untraditional for an advice column, because it's oriented around this particular philosophical idea called value pluralism.

The premise there is that each of us contains multiple values, multiple things we hold dear.

And awkwardly, those values are often in tension with each other.

It's not like one of them is dumb and one of them is the right one.

You might have conflicting values in a situation like honesty versus loyalty or, you know, honesty versus kindness.

Those are all good values, but what do you do when they conflict?

I wanted to talk to Seagal because her column kind of feels like a kindred spirit to Unexplainable.

She's way more interested in how to think about a question than she is about figuring out the exact answer.

She tackles huge questions, and she brings in wisdom from everywhere.

Ancient Greece, early Islam, Enlightenment philosophy, bloggers.

But for this episode, I wanted to focus on a particularly fascinating question about having kids.

So this is the question from a reader.

My partner and I did IVF recently, and luckily we ended up with several embryos.

One of those will be implanted in me, so I hopefully get pregnant.

But which one?

My fertility clinic is encouraging me to do PGTA testing, which would screen for things like Down syndrome,

and would also let me see the sex of each embryo so I could potentially choose whichever I want.

And to be honest, I really want a girl.

I'm also hearing about these new companies that can test embryos for all kinds of things, like how smart the kid might be,

how tall they'll get, whether they'll have a lower chance of getting breast cancer, diabetes, mental illness.

I don't know how to feel about any of this.

On the one hand, it feels weirdly eugenics-y to do so much tinkering with embryos,

and I can't help feeling a little pressured into over-medicalizing everything with these expensive tests.

But then again, if I could do something to make my baby healthier and happier, don't I kind of have to do everything in my power?

What does a parent owe their child?

Yeah.

It's such a weighty question.

What did you first think when you read this?

I mean, to be honest, my first thought was like, oh man, that sentence, like, don't I have to do everything in my power?

Yeah.

Really, that's the moral optimization thing that I've struggled with for years.

Like, don't I have to do the best thing, not just a good thing?

It's my child we're talking about.

Don't I need to do the best I possibly can for them?

So I really right away, like, felt for this person.

On the one hand, feeling pressured and feeling like, oh, I don't want to over-medicalize everything.

but on the other hand, like, maybe I'm supposed to be over-medicalizing this, like, it's my child's future.

But the tacit thing that I hear behind this question is guilt and shame.

I think new parents, and especially, like, expectant mothers, are, like, subjected to a lot of social scrutiny and shaming.

So I think the context here that's unspoken in this question is, like, your kid isn't even out in the world yet, but already you're a bad parent somehow.

How exactly do these screenings lower risk?

Do they do sort of a profile of various embryos and then you kind of get to pick your favorite?

Yes.

Basically, what these companies will do is, let's say you've done IVF and you've managed to get, I don't know, 10 embryos.

Amazing.

Mazel tov.

Great.

They are going to create a profile for each of your embryos.

They're going to give you like a little chart and it's going to say like embryo 1, 2, 3, 4, blah, blah, blah.

And for each embryo, they're going to say, this one, 12% more risk of diabetes, but minus 13% risk of schizophrenia.

Increased IQ potentially on the horizon, but, ooh, higher risk of diabetes, right?

So they're going to give you that profile for each of the embryos.

And what do we know about the tests?

Like, how do they actually work?

Okay, so we should differentiate between a couple different kinds of tests, right?

Okay.

So the first test that this person mentions, PGTA, is a pretty simple test.

It's been around since the 90s.

It can screen for conditions like Down syndrome.

It can let you see the sex of each embryo.

It's pretty common.

The more new and controversial testing is called polygenic testing.

And that is something that tests for very complex conditions that are influenced by thousands of genes.

So we're talking about like depression, breast cancer, but also selecting for a taller kid or a kid with a higher IQ.

So it's a lot more complex.

And stuff like IQ and depression, are these based on genetic markers?

So there is, for depression, a strong genetic component.

IQ also has a strong genetic component.

There's a lot of unknowns.

A lot of what we have is sort of correlational evidence.

Causal is harder, particularly with something like intelligence.

A lot of people have overemphasized how much we know genetically about this.

And they've tried to say, like, if you know XYZ about the genes, you can pretty well predict the intelligence.

I think there's a lot of researchers now who will tell you, like, no, actually, we really don't know, like, the interplay with environments and other things.

So it's a lot more complicated of a story than some genetics-based companies might have you believe.

And how accurate are they?

So it depends what you're testing for.

So sometimes people want to know the risk of each embryo for diabetes, maybe a BRCA mutation that someone might end up getting breast cancer.

That, broadly speaking, is going to be more accurate than psychiatric conditions, which these polygenic tests tend to not perform as well on.

100

These are conditions that are influenced by multiple genes.

101

So it's not like you turn on this one gene, boom, we know it has X effect.

102

Right.

103

I also think it's very important to understand the statistical claims are a little tricky here.

104

So they can claim that if you choose a certain embryo, it'll have a 12% lower risk than others of developing type 2 diabetes.

105

You might hear that and you might think, oh my God, that's amazing.

106

The chance of my kid ever developing diabetes just went down by 12%.

107

Yeah.

108

But it's not like an on-off switch that's so just like black or white, you have it or you don't, right?

109

Things are often on a continuum.

110

So if you hear that, really what it means is like a kid that might have developed diabetes is likely now at the high end of pre-diabetes,

111

or they're going to develop diabetes, but just a few years later than they otherwise would have.

112

The same thing for breast cancer, right?

113

Yes, you'd rather the kid develop it later if they're going to develop it, but it's not like a bill of perfect health that the customer might be imagining when they hear these claims.

114

So they're kind of framing it in a sense of the kid won't get diabetes

115

or they'll be less likely to get it.

116

And what you're saying is that they just might spend less of their life with diabetes.

117

Yeah.

118

I think the statistical claims here are very confusing, even for experts, nevermind lay people.

119

So I think it's like really important to understand it doesn't mean the embryo is not going to get this thing, right?

120

It means conditions are on a continuum.

121

It's not like one day you wake up out of nothing.

122

Suddenly you have like full-blown diabetes.

123

There's pre-diabetic, right?

124

Like there's a whole continuum.

125

And it's also worth noting like mental health conditions are on a continuum, right?

126

You can have, let's say, depression.

127

It could be mild, moderate, severe.

128

So that's also something to think about.

129

Yeah.

130

It feels like diabetes or, you know, a BRCA mutation for breast cancer or some of these more concrete things,

131

they feel very different from an IQ score or depression or other psychiatric disorders,

132

which are both maybe more diffuse and maybe more socially, culturally related.

133

Yes.

134

I think that's such an important point.

135

No one is like sitting there pining, oh, I wish I had cancer.

136

It's like, no, it just, you don't want it.

137

It's bad.

138

You don't cancer but mental health conditions are a little trickier like i'm someone who has anxiety

139

and some obsessive tendencies sometimes that's incredibly annoying for my life

140

but in my experience i also feel like it's correlated with my creativity

141

because i feel like the same kind of thing in my brain

142

that leads me into like rabbit holes of worry also leads

143

me into rabbit holes of i've just just found out this cool scientific fact.

144

Now I want to go into the wee hours of the morning researching it and then write a children's book about it.

145

Yeah, I feel the same.

146

I mean, I have OCD and I hate it.

147

And then there are often times when it definitely feels like a superpower

148

that I can hyper-focus or I can hear details

149

or I can like obsess over something to a point that I can make it perfect.

150

And you can work on improving a mental health condition.

151

You can work on emphasizing the pros and de-emphasizing the negatives.

152

But if someone came to me and gave me a magic wand to just eliminate all of it, that seems harder.

153

That seems like a harder decision.

154

Yeah, same.

155

Like, if someone gave me the magic wand and told me I could eliminate my stuff, like, I would say no thanks.

156

I don't want to romanticize these conditions.

157

Like, you know, sometimes stuff can be really hard, but on balance, like, no, I wouldn't just be like, let's wave a magic wand and get rid of it.

158

So I don't think I would want to do that for a baby either.

159

Coming up in a minute, what should the parent do?

160

Yeah, I mean, that's where it gets really complicated and hard.

161

And this is where a lot of people are going to start fighting.

162

Support for the show comes from Mint Mobile.

163

Summer is great when you're a kid.

164

No homework, no school, just long days to spend doing whatever you want.

165

Well, that feeling doesn't need to go away when you grow up.

166

In fact, it gets better with spending power.

167

So if you're looking for ways to save this summer, then you can start by lowering your phone bill with Mint Mobile.

168

Right now, all of Mint's plans are $15 per month, including unlimited.

169

All their plans come with high-speed 5G data and unlimited talk and text.

170

You can even bring your current phone and your number.

171

To get your new wireless plan for just $15 a month, go to mintmobile.com slash grayarea.

172

That's mintmobile.com slash grayarea Cut your wireless bill to 15 bucks a month at mintmobile.com slash grayarea That's it.

173

There's no catch Upfront payment of $45 for three months,

174

90 for six months, or 180 for 12-month plan required $15 per month equivalent Taxes and fees extra,

175

initial plan term only Greater than 50 gigabytes may slow when network is busy

176

Includes up to 20 gigabyte hotspot Capable device required Availability, speed, and coverage varies.

177

See MintMobile.com.

178

So let's talk about the should part of this question.

179

Like, should this person select for the best possible baby?

180

I wonder if you can start with the argument for it.

181

Where would you start there?

182

Yeah, so I think the first thing is a scientific issue.

183

It has a bit of a funny name.

184

It's called pleiotropy.

185

It's basically a fancy way of saying that we know not that much about which genes cause what.

186

You might have a gene that's correlated with, let's say, depression.

187

but it might also be correlated with a bunch of other things.

188

So if everyone were to suddenly start selecting embryos to try to prevent their kids from getting depression, we don't actually know what would happen on a population level.

189

It's possible other traits might be impacted.

190

There does seem to be a general trend that, you know, decreasing the risk for like one disease also goes along with decreasing risk for other diseases.

191

But it still worries me somewhat but because there's a lot we don't know.

192

I also wonder how much this stuff costs.

193

Like, would this only be available to rich people?

194

So right now, polygenic testing is not cheap.

195

One company, for example, Orchid, it charges $2,500 per screened embryo.

196

So if you test 10 embryos, that's going to run you $25,000.

197

Right.

198

So in the short term, at least, that does raise the specter of entrenching some kind of caste system where you get this growing gap between rich

199

and poor people because the rich people get to have the babies that are smarter, stronger, healthier, and the poorer people don't.

200

And there might just be kind of pressure on people with less money to spend their life savings onto things like this.

201

Yeah, absolutely.

202

And that's actually my concern about the longer term, especially.

203

So technologies do tend to get cheaper as they mature.

204

So it is conceivable that in 10, 20 years, we'll have a way to do this kind of polygenic screening that is not 2,500 bucks a pop.

205

but that still raises what I would call the specter of implicit coercion.

206

So I actually get more worried about this when it becomes cheaper.

207

If it's cheap enough that, you know, Joe Schmo can do it, then you start to have this cross society trend of lots and lots and lots of people are doing it.

208

And now if you don't do that for your kid, you kind of start to feel like you're putting them at a massive professional and educational disadvantage.

209

So that creates a risk of implicit coercion

210

which i do think is is worrisome yeah

211

and from the perspective of the child i don't know unless

212

your parent lies to you later on you know you're gonna

213

know like this kind of testing was done to arrive at the you

214

that you became yeah and you might feel some type of way about it

215

so for example you can find out the sex of the

216

baby the question asker in the column said to be honest i really want a girl

217

so i'm really tempted but like what

218

if you you really want a girl oh you select for the one

219

that says it's going to be a girl 10 years later 20 years later the kid says actually i'm trans

220

and i you know i don't identify as a girl

221

and then they're going to know unless you lie to them

222

that you went out of your way to choose a girl

223

and it was

224

so important to you to have a girl they have this

225

sense of my parents spent tens of thousands of dollars trying to achieve this consumer good

226

and they're they might feel like oh i extra feel like

227

a disappointment to you now yeah i mean kids have to deal with enough disappointing their parents all the time Right, right.

228

I worry, like, this is going to create a lot of therapy sessions on, like, topics we haven't had to deal with before.

229

Okay, and then I think kind of, like, hovering over this whole conversation is the idea of eugenics.

230

Yep.

231

Is there a concern about removing certain types of, like, just real— Human experience?

232

Yeah, removing human experience from the equation.

233

I think absolutely.

234

I think, you know, this is sort of, like, the— extension of a problem that already exists, you know, in terms of, let's say, conditions like Down syndrome,

235

which are screened for so commonly now.

236

And, you know, that's really ethically questionable because even

237

if we come to a place where we feel confident that for you as an individual, polygenic screening is going to lead to a better outcome for your individual kid,

238

we still have to look at on the population level, what does this mean for society?

239

If more and more people start using this technology.

240

You start to get questions about removing entire swaths of human experience from the world.

241

And I don't know, I think that when you have conditions that are very compatible with a happy life, that are just like, you know, okay, someone has anxiety, someone has this, someone has that.

242

There's pros and cons to it.

243

That is much more of an open question, I would say.

244

So clearly there are arguments against this.

245

At the same time, I don't want to make it seem like this is an obvious decision.

246

You clearly don't think this is an obvious decision.

247

What are the arguments in favor of selecting for babies?

248

I think the argument in favor pulls a lot from this intuition that probably a lot of us have, which is like, look, it's your kid.

249

Like, surely you want to do the best you can for your kid, right?

250

Like, of course you want them to have the best possible life they can possibly have.

251

And you have some philosophers like Julian Savalescu,

252

for example, who argue that parents have a moral obligation to create children with the best chance of the best life.

253

And you see this argument echoed in the founders of some of these polygenic testing companies.

254

So for example, Noor Siddiqui, who heads up the company Orchid, one of the polygenic testing companies,

255

she talks a lot about protecting your kids from various health conditions, talking about some kind of health problem down the line.

256

She'll say, what if you could have stopped it, but chose not to?

257

I do find myself compelled by some of this.

258

Yes.

259

As someone who's about to be a parent.

260

Yeah.

261

You know, I'm an Ashkenazi Jew.

262

When Ashkenazi Jews have kids with other Ashkenazi Jews, it's kind of like default to go get tested for Tay-Sachs,

263

which is this, you know, debilitating, fatal disease.

264

And it just makes me think that, okay, there is a universe where it feels very simple.

265

But how do you weigh the potential benefits of protecting your child,

266

of trying to give them the best life against the potential downsides of commodifying our relationship to our kids,

267

of causing an unknown reaction that we're not aware of?

268

I go back to Herbert Simon, who who is a Nobel laureate in economics

269

and in a way the granddaddy of a lot of our kind of maximizing, optimizing talk.

270

And he came up with this term that I absolutely love, which is satisficing.

271

That's a portmanteau of satisfying and sufficing.

272

And that is meant to describe opting for the good enough choice.

273

He said that, look, like many problems in life just contain way more variables

274

and way too much uncertainty for maximizing along any one axis to be a feasible or even desirable thing.

275

So often it just makes sense to go with an option that is good enough, you know, to satisfy.

276

And to me, satisficing in the context of like thinking about the genetic lottery for your child means,

277

yeah, let's prevent them from having debilitating things like Tay-Sachs, Because that doesn't feel good enough for your child.

278

But maybe we don't need to try to make them the tall, blue-eyed Adonis.

279

That doesn't feel like satisficing anymore.

280

So what did you tell the person who wrote in?

281

I told them, look, I'm not going to tell you, you shouldn't do this kind of screening ever.

282

I think it depends on the situation.

283

It depends what you're screening for, what's your story.

284

But what I would say is do not let yourself be bullied or shamed by others, especially if they have a profit incentive to push you to do a certain test, right?

285

I think that when someone who runs a company says, what if you could have stopped it, but you chose not to?

286

Give us money.

287

Yeah, that's preying on your worst fears and insecurities as a prospective parent.

288

And it's kind of holding parents hostage to a moral logic that pretends to be giving them more autonomy,

289

but actually it's robbing you of autonomy because it's saying you must do this kind of testing on your child.

290

And I just want prospective parents to feel like, look, you are nobody's hostage.

291

You can look at the many different relevant factors in your family's life, weigh all of them in the balance, and then make the choice that works good enough for your family.

292

What did people think about the advice you gave?

293

Did you hear from any readers?

294

So there are a lot of people in my Twitter orbit who are very like into polygenic testing.

295

So they have argued with me a bunch.

296

But I also got a really touching email from a mother of a child with Down syndrome.

297

And she said, look, like I made the choice years ago to go ahead and have this child.

298

A lot of other people are just not going forward with pregnancies

299

when they found out the kid will have down syndrome i went ahead

300

and had this kid and like i'm

301

so happy i love my kid we have a great life like yeah not everything is peaches

302

and roses all the time but i think it's totally compatible with a happy life

303

and i see that in my child's life

304

and in my life as a parent and

305

so thank you for pointing out that these conditions

306

that we've societally come to think are like oh just screen out

307

and nix them from the get-go thank you for being willing to consider That actually, a lot of conditions are like in this zone where, yeah, there's some hard stuff about it,

308

but there can also be some beautiful stuff about it.

309

Yeah.

310

Maybe we don't need to be

311

so quick to get rid of all possible swaths of human experience that look a little bit different.

312

I mean, it just makes me think of trying to have a goal of humility when you want to say,

313

let's give my child the best chance at the best life.

314

Yeah.

315

maybe being humble about what we think of as the best life.

316

Yeah.

317

And if we're overconfident in what we think of as best, I don't know, life surprises you in a lot of ways.

318

I think that's really, really true.

319

I think we are deeply confused as a species about what is the good.

320

The whole history of philosophy is one long lesson in, we don't know what the good is, and we're deeply confused about it.

321

So I don't want to necessarily presume to know for my kid what's going to be the most beautiful kind of life.

322

who also wrote the music.

323

He is out for now because in the time since we taped this episode, he has become a parent.

324

Congrats to Noam and the whole family.

325

This episode was edited by Joanna Salataroff with help from Meredith Hotnot.

326

Mixing and sound design from Christian Ayala.

327

Fact-checking from Melissa Hirsch.

328

Julia Longoria and Jorge Just are our editorial directors.

329

Amy Padula gives great advice.

330

I'm Sally Helm, and I jump in to record the credits when necessary.

331

Bird Pinkerton was confused.

332

Can't you just get any guitar?

333

Platy shook her head.

334

You think it's easy to be a platypus playing a guitar?

335

You think I can just buy a platypus guitar at Guitar Center?

336

If you are ever going to put this guitar back together, you'll need to find the man who made it.

337

Thanks to Brian Resnick for co-creating the show with Bird and Noam.

338

And if any of you out there have thoughts about the show, send us an email.

339

We are at unexplainable at Vox.com.

340

You can also leave us a review or a rating wherever you listen, which really helps us out.

341

And if you are into supporting the show and all of Vox in general, join our membership program.

342

You can go to Vox.com slash members to sign up.

343

Unexplainable is part of the Vox Media Podcast Network, and we'll see you next time.

344

Thanks for watching.

345

Each week we'll be in your audio and video feeds with great interviews and a philosophy-minded look at tech, culture, politics, and much more.

346

Episodes of The Gray Area drop on Mondays and Fridays on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.

347

As always, we want to know what you thought of the episode, so drop us a line at thegrayareaatvox.com.

348

And if you enjoy our reporting and want to hear more from Vox journalists,

349

then consider becoming a member of the Vox community on Patreon at patreon.com slash Vox.

ऐप डाउनलोड करें

धाराप्रवाह बोलने के लिए ज़रूरी सब कुछ

AI उच्चारण स्कोरहर वाक्य का स्कोर

IPA अभ्यासहर ध्वनि में महारत

शब्दावलीअपना शब्द भंडार बनाएँ

शब्द गेमखेलते हुए सीखें

QR स्कैन करें

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

उसी चैनल से

FOR YOU

अनुशंसित वीडियो

241 वाक्य

The strange reason nobody views their own retaliation as evil | Paul Bloom

IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students

107 वाक्य

Sheldocracy Is the Only Ethical Solution | Young Sheldon

IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepCambridge Exam Prep

154 वाक्य

Jordan Peterson On Importance Of Reading

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

84 वाक्य

“But you did it first!”: A defense of the whataboutism

IELTS PrepTOEFL PrepUniversity Students

69 वाक्य

Kids don’t always make you happier. Here’s why people have them anyway. | Paul Bloom

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

150 वाक्य

Why We Can't Save Those We Love

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

53 वाक्य

Gabor Maté – Authenticity vs. Attachment

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

166 वाक्य

Gen Z's Morality Crisis

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

273 वाक्य

PNTV: Get Out of Your Mind & Into Your Life by Steven C. Hayes

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

388 वाक्य

A Matter of Meaning: What Other People Teach You About Your Communication

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

814 वाक्य

What It Means To Be A Good Man Today With Tom Junod

Daily ConversationUniversity StudentsWorking Adults

इस पाठ की शब्दावली और बोलने के सुझाव

यह C1 स्तर का स्पीकिंग पाठ वीडियो “What does a parent owe their child?” पर आधारित है। इस वीडियो में शैडोइंग के लिए 349 वाक्य और 4448 शब्द हैं। बोला गया हिस्सा 26:09 लंबा है। वक्ता लगभग 170 शब्द प्रति मिनट की स्वाभाविक गति से बोलता है, जो रोज़मर्रा की बातचीत के करीब है। 82% शब्द अंग्रेज़ी के 3,000 सबसे आम शब्दों में से हैं; बाकी शब्द अभ्यास से पहले देख लेना अच्छा रहेगा।

इस वीडियो की मुख्य शब्दावली

वीडियो के 15 सबसे कठिन शब्द, उच्चारण और अर्थ के साथ:

शब्द	उच्चारण	अर्थ
embryo संज्ञा	/ˈɛmbɹi.oʊ/	भ्रूण
correlate क्रिया	/ˈkɔɹəleɪt/	सहसंबंध करना, संबंध जोड़ना
coercion संज्ञा	/koʊˈɝʒən/	ज़ोर-जबरदस्ती
specter संज्ञा	/ˈspɛktɚ/	भूत
autonomy संज्ञा	/ɔˈtɑ.nə.mi/	स्वायत्तता, स्वराज
hostage संज्ञा	/ˈhɑs.tɪd͡ʒ/	बंधक
weigh क्रिया	/weɪ/	तौलना, जोखना
honesty संज्ञा	/ˈɑ.nɪ.sti/	सच्चाई
rabbit संज्ञा	/ˈɹæbɪt/	ख़रगोश, खरगोश
fertility संज्ञा	/fɝˈtɪləti/	उपजाऊपन
premise संज्ञा	/ˈpɹɛm.ɪs/	आधार, पूर्वाधार
genetics संज्ञा	/dʒəˈnɛt.ɪks/	अनुवांशिकी
blogger संज्ञा	/ˈblɔ.ɡəɹ/	ब्लॉगर
misery संज्ञा	/ˈmɪz(ə)ɹi/	दुःख, दुर्दशा
researcher संज्ञा	/ˈɹiˌsɝ.t͡ʃɚ/	शोधकर्ता, शोधक

वीडियो में आने वाली फ़्रेज़ल वर्ब

शब्द	उच्चारण	अर्थ
go ahead क्रिया	/ˌɡoʊ əˈhɛd/	आगे बढ़ना

दोहराने लायक वाक्य

वीडियो के छोटे, पूरे वाक्य जिन्हें आप रोज़ की बातचीत में इस्तेमाल कर सकते हैं:

What did you first think when you read this?
Don't I need to do the best I possibly can for them?
Where would you start there?
What did people think about the advice you gave?
Can't you just get any guitar?

इस वीडियो का व्याकरण

वक्ता जिन संरचनाओं का सबसे अधिक प्रयोग करता है, वीडियो के असली शब्दों के साथ:

संरचना	वीडियो में
Present perfect have/has + past participle — बीता हुआ काम जिसका असर अभी भी है	haven't solved · I've struggled · you've done
Passive voice be + past participle — ज़ोर इस पर कि क्या होता है, न कि कौन करता है	is called · will be implanted · are influenced
Relative clauses who / which + उपवाक्य — व्यक्ति या वस्तु के बारे में अतिरिक्त जानकारी	someone who is · someone who has · have, which is

ध्यान देने योग्य उच्चारण

वक्ता 88 बार संक्षिप्त रूपों का प्रयोग करता है, जैसे don't, I'm, they're। इन्हें वैसे ही छोटा बोलें जैसा आप सुनते हैं।

“th” की ध्वनियाँ: swath /swɑθ/, ethical /ˈɛθɪkəl/
“sh” और “zh” की ध्वनियाँ: coercion /koʊˈɝʒən/, mutation /mjuˈteɪʃən/, socially /ˈsoʊʃəli/, equation /ɪˈkweɪ.ʒən/, obligation /ˌɑ.blɪˈɡeɪ.ʃn̩/
लंबे शब्द — बलाघात सही रखें: unexplainable /ˌʌn.ɛksˈpleɪ.nə.bl̩/, debilitate /dəˈbɪləteɪt/, medicalize /ˈmɛdɪkəlaɪz/, autonomy /ɔˈtɑ.nə.mi/, psychiatric /ˌsaɪ.kiˈæt.ɹɪk/

हिंदी भाषियों के लिए मुश्किल ध्वनियाँ:

/v/ और /w/ का फ़र्क़ — /v/ में ऊपर के दाँत निचले होंठ को छूते हैं, /w/ में होंठ गोल होते हैं: wand /wɑnd/, swath /swɑθ/, prospective /pɹəˈspɛktɪv/, weigh /weɪ/, questionable /ˈkwɛst͡ʃənəbl̩/
/z/ — इसे “ज” (/dʒ/) न बनाएँ: medicalize /ˈmɛdɪkəlaɪz/, maximize /ˈmæksəmaɪz/, emphasize /ˈɛm.fə.saɪz/, confuse /kənˈfjuːz/, desirable /dɪˈzaɪəɹəbəl/
शब्द की शुरुआत में s + व्यंजन — पहले “इ” न जोड़ें: specter /ˈspɛktɚ/, swath /swɑθ/

इस वीडियो से अभ्यास कैसे करें

पहले बिना बोले पूरा वीडियो एक बार सुनें और जो शब्द नहीं आते उन्हें लिख लें।
0.75× गति से शुरू करें, एक-एक वाक्य की शैडोइंग करें, और सहज लगने पर सामान्य गति पर लौटें।
अपनी आवाज़ रिकॉर्ड करें और मूल से तुलना करें, ख़ासकर embryo, correlate, coercion जैसे शब्दों पर ध्यान दें।

शैडोइंग तकनीक क्या है?

शैडोइंग (Shadowing) एक विज्ञान-समर्थित भाषा सीखने की तकनीक है जो मूल रूप से पेशेवर दुभाषिया प्रशिक्षण के लिए विकसित की गई थी। विधि सरल लेकिन शक्तिशाली है: आप मूल अंग्रेज़ी ऑडियो सुनते हैं और तुरंत इसे ज़ोर से दोहराते हैं — जैसे वक्ता की छाया 1-2 सेकंड की देरी से। शोध से पता चलता है कि यह उच्चारण सटीकता, स्वर, लय, जुड़ी हुई ध्वनियाँ, सुनने की समझ और बोलने की प्रवाहशीलता में काफ़ी सुधार करता है।

शैडोइंग तकनीक: पूरी चरण-दर-चरण गाइड पढ़ें →

शैडोइंग अभ्यास: What does a parent owe their child? | The Gray Area - वीडियो के साथ अंग्रेजी बोलना सीखें

अभ्यास मोड चुनें

ऐप डाउनलोड करें

Why financial literacy education in the US sucks

The surprising pattern behind color names around the world

White, pink, and brown noise, explained #shorts

Five things you need to know for the 2026 midterms | America, Actually

Why are weddings so damn expensive?

Are headphones destroying our hearing?

How to be less neurotic | The Gray Area

We’re already using AI more than we realize

The Ticketmaster monopoly is over, now what?

The biggest peach myth in America

How to solve problems like a designer

The origin of the '80s aesthetic

Why “Buy one, get one free” isn’t a great deal

How F1 drivers survive their own cars

Why 350°F is the magic number for baking

How did pink become a girly color?

The real reason Boeing's new plane crashed twice

Food waste is the world's dumbest problem

Why AI art struggles with hands

Why is everything getting so expensive?

The strange reason nobody views their own retaliation as evil | Paul Bloom

Sheldocracy Is the Only Ethical Solution | Young Sheldon

Jordan Peterson On Importance Of Reading

“But you did it first!”: A defense of the whataboutism

Kids don’t always make you happier. Here’s why people have them anyway. | Paul Bloom

Why We Can't Save Those We Love

Gabor Maté – Authenticity vs. Attachment

Gen Z's Morality Crisis

PNTV: Get Out of Your Mind & Into Your Life by Steven C. Hayes

A Matter of Meaning: What Other People Teach You About Your Communication

What It Means To Be A Good Man Today With Tom Junod

इस पाठ की शब्दावली और बोलने के सुझाव

इस वीडियो की मुख्य शब्दावली

वीडियो में आने वाली फ़्रेज़ल वर्ब

दोहराने लायक वाक्य

इस वीडियो का व्याकरण

ध्यान देने योग्य उच्चारण

इस वीडियो से अभ्यास कैसे करें

शैडोइंग तकनीक क्या है?