Shadowing Practice: Como evitar emburrecer na era dos smartphones - Learn English Speaking with Video

Kies een oefenmodus

Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.

118 zinnen

Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.

Very good, ladies and gentlemen, recently I read this article of opinion published in the New York Times by the journalist Mary Harrington,

a Britannica, and I think it's worth a look at a idea about the argument of this journalist in this article.

Of course, it's not a scientific article, it's a opinion, as it says, but I think it's interesting to raise it these reflections.

So I'll try to structure the argument of this journalist this article of opinion

and then I will tell you some things about what I think about it and maybe some suggestions for you, okay?

First, subscribe to the channel, if you're not subscribed to the channel, leave your subscribe, leave your like and then comment what you think

that I'm trying to do to do videos here for YouTube

and your interaction is important to reforcer my comportment of going back here, okay?

Very well, what Mary Harrington says here in this excellent article in The New York Times?

Basically, she says that thinking is becoming a luxury, a luxury, and that few people from now on this point,

or at this point, can think not only clearly, but also have time to think.

And the argument of it is structured in the following way.

First, it makes clear that a deep deep deep is capable of developing cognitive capacities.

What is a deep deep deep?

It's the deep deep deep that you are in the attention of the object that you are reading.

It's not the deep deep deep deep,

deep deep, deep deep, Instagram, or feed of TikTok but that's the way you can see it on a text,

understand what the author wanted to argument in the text and can take away from it a very refined

a very refined way of the thesis that is defined by the author.

And she is right in saying that.

In fact, you have, and here I'm talking as a neuroscientist, you have this experience of a more difficult reading makes with your brain,

tal qual a muscle, metaphorically speaking, it's much more hypertrophied, more robust,

not necessarily more, but more capable of getting to understand things more difficult.

That's why a reader accustomed to text denser

can spend less energy reading these texts denser than a reader who doesn't read anything.

It will obviously end a difficulty to interpret a text a little more difficult.

So, yes, a deep reading this part of her argument is correct.

Second, she says that the digital environment reduces our capacity to exercise this lecture.

And this is also correct.

When you have lot of time on the internet, especially in social media, which is where people spend more time in the internet,

especially Instagram and TikTok, and in Brazil, I've said this in other videos, we use a lot of social media compared to other countries,

even though, a British author, I'll give an example.

I went to London a few months ago and I was shocked how people in environments like pubs, which is like in London, there's a pub in some place,

they don't stay on the phone.

Sometimes there's two people in a table, drinking beer, drinking beer, drinking beer, and then it kind of happens to these two people and they don't push the phone to look.

The only person in the phone with the phone in hand was I who took it to take a photo to tour.

So, of course, when we are more time in the social media, we are not exercising so much our cognitive faculties.

And, by the contrary, we are, at least not exercising so much the cognitive faculties more complex,

but we are exercising the muscles of the brain that are used to a quick content.

atrofiando, então, os músculos que querem um conteúdo, que sustentam um conteúdo mais complexo,

e hipertrofiando os músculos que trabalham com conteúdo rápido.

Isso é curioso, porque o cérebro não fica podre, digamos assim, de uma maneira geral.

Você continua exercitando áreas envolvidas com resposta a estímulos de recompensa mais rápida, de dopamina mais rápida.

So, for now, without any tir or not, the journalist is correct.

So she says that, as a deep dive develops these cognitive capacities important,

as we spend a lot of time on social media and not exercise these complex facultades,

so the digital environment has this power to reduce our cognitive capacities more elevations.

And I agree with you.

And the next step of her argument is to say that the exposure to the digital environment is equal to classes.

I don't know if it's true in the United States, I don't know where she took this data, but here in Brazil I would say, and this is just a machismo my,

that by the fact that we are one of the biggest consumers of social media media, this probably was diluted here.

I believe that the man who studied in a particular school, who studied public, the guy rich, the guy poor etc, all of them use a social network.

Again, because we are a country that consumes a social network and this is statistically proven.

So I don't know if this is able to be translated to this, but the fact is that, according to her, in the United States,

as people more poor pass more time on social media,

these people will have a lower capacity to exercise these higher functions of their intellect.

And therefore, it justifies the title of the opinion of her,

that people with more money will have more capacity to think with quality, because these people with more money, and theoretically not be so much on social media.

I think, here's my achism, that in Brazil, people with money,

people without money, they are not immune to the effects of the social media, the use of the social media.

And here, just to be clear, first, why is social media a big problem when you use it too?

And you must use, yes, much more than you imagine, just to go to the settings of your smartphone and see how long you spend on social media,

Instagram, TikTok, etc. Probably is more than you imagine.

Why is it a problem?

For two reasons.

In terms of neurobiology.

First, because you are used to be a superficial content and cheap in terms of recompense.

And then it makes you make other things that demand more effort.

And things that demand effort, like doing a TCC in the school, going to a conference, etc., you have to give a recovery immediate in prol of a future recovery.

So you have to be a brain, to have a greater desire to find a very much more to find a very cheap recovery.

In second place, because when you get a feed, these feeds infinites, that you don't know what comes after,

and this imprevisibility makes your brain explode in terms dopaminérgicos, you enter in a very similar situation with a dissociation.

Why?

Because a state of dissociation is when you are not taking care of what is taking care of it.

And you simply are taking a travel trip.

And your attention is being taken care of it without knowing what is happening.

And after that, that moment, that temporal session, you are incapable of remembering what happened.

And this may happen with you in the moment of infinitive roll of feed.

I suggest you experiment after finishing the feed.

And try to remember 4 or 5 videos that you just saw.

It's probably not that you remember.

Because you were in this state dissociative, kind of lost within you.

It's very crazy because it's important to have these states dissociative.

Many people, I'm not talking about in terms of pathological, many people will travel to car to make a more parecida, many people will watch a film that they don't want to pay attention to espare,

or they will walk, they will go.

The problem is that when you have these states of travel in the mayonnaise within a business that is hyper dopaminérgico,

you start to mess up your systems and become dependent on that.

That's it.

Dito all this, it can be that yes, it can be that yes, it can be that the opinion of this journalist is correct, the hypothesis is that.

It can be that it can be transformed or it can be transformed in a situation, in a situation, in a situation, more rare.

and then I don't know if it's exclusive from elite

or from people that have a greater capacity of sacar

that social is a funnel of attention and

that you can't get out of the list if you don't have a effort at.

This, in my opinion, will also increase even more with the advent of these models of IA, like chat EPT.

I don't know about this, but I think you can have a great use of it to expand your capacity cognitive and your studies,

etc. But when a person tercerizes for a chat EPT to do something, just tercerize, write a story about it.

And if she didn't write, didn't think, didn't raciocin, didn't talk, didn't instigate with him,

you also will be atrofied a series of areas and will be incapable of thinking in the absence of that.

100

So, I think the great suggestion that I do here in this video to you, that is here me watching and that,

101

and so is a person who is more concerned with studies, habits, things more healthy, with your future,

102

is that you don't let your car...

103

You know your behavior like a car in a supermarket with a broken rod?

104

You push it passively and it goes to the side.

105

I suggest you don't let this car in a broken rod with a broken rod and you take it to five years, I'm going to be able to be able to read social media,

106

without reading three books, and not able to be able to raciocine, because it's a whole thing for the chat EPT or for similar models.

107

Think about yourself, emancipate intellectually,

108

and not be afraid of the reals infinite that you can't remember what you just saw.

109

Because your life will pass, will pass, will pass, and maybe you'll be ashamed a lot of losing a good thing that we can't get more, which is the time.

110

All right?

111

This is the reflection of this video.

112

I think I can contemplate the points that I wrote here.

113

I hope it has been relevant.

114

And if you were, leave your like here for me to come back to produce content for you.

115

And also, I'll let you know some suggestions of content in the comments, that the Matheus, who is the editor here,

116

will be sent me to have ideas of video to contemplate what you want to know.

117

Valeu!

118

Nos vemos no próximo vídeo e até lá.

App downloaden

Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken

AI UitspraakScoor elke zin

IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid

WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op

WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt

Scan QR

Download on theApp Store Get it onGoogle Play

FOR YOU

Aanbevolen Video

1,463

20 zinnen

Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les

Deze spreekles op niveau B2 is gebaseerd op de video “Como evitar emburrecer na era dos smartphones”. Deze video bevat 118 zinnen en 1851 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 11:38. De spreker praat in een natuurlijk tempo van ongeveer 159 woorden per minuut, dicht bij een alledaags gesprek. 82% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden; de rest kun je beter vooraf bekijken.

Belangrijke woorden in deze video

De 15 moeilijkste woorden uit de video, met uitspraak en betekenis:

Woord	Uitspraak	Betekenis
cognitive bijvoeglijk naamwoord	/ˈkɑɡ.nɪ.tɪv/	cognitief
subscribe werkwoord	/səbˈskɹaɪb/	abonneren
contemplate werkwoord	/ˈkɑn.təmˌpleɪt/	beschouwen, contempleren
dissociation zelfstandig naamwoord	/dɪˌsoʊsiˈeɪʃən/	dissociatie, scheiding
dense bijvoeglijk naamwoord	/ˈdɛns/	dicht
infinite bijvoeglijk naamwoord	/ˈɪnfɪnɪt/	oneindig, eindeloos
reflection zelfstandig naamwoord	/ɹɪˈflɛkʃən/	reflectie, weerspiegeling
continuum zelfstandig naamwoord	/kənˈtɪnjuəm/	continuüm
dilute werkwoord	/daɪˈljuːt/	verdunnen
emancipate werkwoord	/əˈmæn(t)səˌpeɪt/	emanciperen, vrijmaken
funnel zelfstandig naamwoord	/ˈfʌnəl/	trechter
hypertrophy zelfstandig naamwoord	/haɪˈpɜɹ.tɹə.fi/	hypertrofie
infinitive zelfstandig naamwoord	/ɪnˈfɪnɪtɪv/	infinitief, onbepaalde wijs
instigate werkwoord	/ˈɪnstəɡeɪt/	aanstichten
intellect zelfstandig naamwoord	/ˈɪntəlɛkt/	intellect

Phrasal verbs die je zult horen

Woord	Betekenis
go back werkwoord	teruggaan
mess up werkwoord	verrommelen, in de war brengen

Grammatica in deze video

De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:

Structuur	In de video
Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet	is structured · is defined · was diluted
Betrekkelijke bijzinnen who / which + zin — extra informatie over een persoon of ding	media, which is · pubs, which is · man who studied
Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telt	I've said · has been

Uitspraak om op te letten

De spreker gebruikt 31 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals don't, didn't, I'm. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.

De “th”-klanken: pathological /ˌpæθ.əˈlɑd͡ʒ.ɪ.kəl/, hypothesis /haɪˈpɒθɪsɪs/, thesis /ˈθisɪs/
De klanken “sh” en “zh”: dissociation /dɪˌsoʊsiˈeɪʃən/, dissociative /dɪˈsoʊ.ʃi.ə.tɪv/, reflection /ɹɪˈflɛkʃən/, superficial /ˌsupɚˈfɪʃəl/, elevation /ˌɛlɪˈveɪʃn̩/
Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: dissociation /dɪˌsoʊsiˈeɪʃən/, dissociative /dɪˈsoʊ.ʃi.ə.tɪv/, emancipate /əˈmæn(t)səˌpeɪt/, hypertrophy /haɪˈpɜɹ.tɹə.fi/, infinitive /ɪnˈfɪnɪtɪv/

Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:

Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: cognitive /ˈkɑɡ.nɪ.tɪv/, subscribe /səbˈskɹaɪb/, dissociative /dɪˈsoʊ.ʃi.ə.tɪv/, infinitive /ɪnˈfɪnɪtɪv/, mayonnaise /ˌmeɪ.əˈneɪz/
/æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: transform /tɹænsˈfɔɹm/, emancipate /əˈmæn(t)səˌpeɪt/, passively /ˈpæs.ɪv.li/, pathological /ˌpæθ.əˈlɑd͡ʒ.ɪ.kəl/, advent /ˈæd.vɛnt/
/g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: cognitive /ˈkɑɡ.nɪ.tɪv/, instigate /ˈɪnstəɡeɪt/

Zo oefen je met deze video

Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als cognitive, subscribe, contemplate.

Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?

Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.

Shadowing-techniek: lees de volledige stap-voor-stap-gids →

Shadowing Practice: Como evitar emburrecer na era dos smartphones - Learn English Speaking with Video

Kies een oefenmodus

App downloaden

Social Media and Your Mental Health

A NEUROCIÊNCIA DA APRENDIZAGEM

Are we heading to an era of stagnation or innovation?

What Don't You Understand? - A Short Film about ADHD

Is smart technology making us dumb? | GMF compact

Why Your Brain Thinks Resting is a Threat to Survival

GATHERING IN THE DIGITAL ERA

FYI - Chat series with EU Ambassador: Episode 4 - Filter Your Internet

This Is the *Only* Method to Become Fluent in English

my anti-brainrot everyday carry 2026

تعلم الانجليزية من القصص مستوى B1-B2 | التعفن الدماغي

The 15% Rule: How to Learn Faster | Andrew Huberman