Shadowing Practice: The Inflation Problem... It's Worse Than You Think - Learn English Speaking with Video
Kies een oefenmodus
Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.
258 zinnen
Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.
1
Right now, everyone's blaming inflation on the Middle East.
2
That's the narrative we're being told and everyone's accepted it.
3
And it makes sense why.
4
It's easy to follow.
5
There's a clean cause and a clean effect.
6
It's so simple you can draw it on a napkin.
7
Except there's one problem with this story.
8
The Federal Reserve keeps its own inflation scoreboard.
9
They don't use the number you see in the headlines.
10
They target 2% inflation measured by personal consumption expenditures, the PCE.
11
That's the scoreboard that counts.
12
That's also where the mainstream story falls apart.
13
The conflict in the Middle East started in February, just five months ago, but the Federal Reserve's measure has now missed the inflation target for 63 months in a row,
14
more than five years straight.
15
The PCE currently sits at a little over 4%, more than double the Fed's target, and is continuing to climb,
16
so everyone's using a five-month-old story to diagnose a five-year-old problem.
17
And this isn't just a number that only matters to economists.
18
This single number lies at the foundation of every economic decision in the United States, And every rate you pay is priced off what people expect that number to be.
19
Your mortgage, your car loan, what your savings account pays you, what the cash in your wallet is worth next year.
20
So it's worth asking, what's actually going on?
21
Because there's clearly more to the inflation story.
22
Inflation in this country used to move like a pendulum.
23
It would swing up, swing back down, and eventually come to rest around that 2% number.
24
You never questioned it, because you never had to.
25
even had a name for this period of American history, the Great Moderation.
26
From 1985 to 2007, growth was steady, inflation was low, and the whole economy looked like it regulated itself.
27
Except it didn't.
28
There was no invisible hand.
29
There was a real one, someone standing beside the pendulum, giving it a firm push back toward the middle every single time it swung too far,
30
done so reliably for so long that everyone forgot the pendulum was being pushed at all.
31
That's what the last five years are actually about.
32
The thing doing the pushing is now the one in trouble.
33
But before we get there, we need to look closer at that 2% number itself.
34
For a number the entire financial system is anchored to, you'd assume it fell out of some impossibly complex math equation,
35
or it was carved in stone and passed down generations.
36
Well, neither.
37
Somebody chose it.
38
So why the 2%?
39
Here's St. Louis Federal Reserve economist Christopher Neely explaining how they landed on that 2% target number.
40
When central banks were considering what sort of an inflation rate to target,
41
they were really trading off the costs of having inflation with the benefits of having some upward movement in prices,
42
which might have benefits in terms of allowing central banks to stabilize the macroeconomy.
43
So 2% was kind of a happy medium.
44
So while the target number itself may have come from an arbitrary decision, there's still reasoning behind it.
45
But why not go lower?
46
Why not go to zero?
47
That's the obvious question.
48
If inflation's the thing quietly making everything more expensive, why aim for any of it at all?
49
Because while on paper, a zero percent inflation rate sounds great, in reality, it's not.
50
When a recession hits, the Fed's main move is to cut interest rates.
51
In a world with zero inflation, rates already sit near the floor.
52
So the second a real economic downturn arrives, the Fed gets one cut, maybe two, and then slams into zero, structurally trapped and out of road.
53
That's how an ordinary recession can spiral into a decade-long depression.
54
But you can't aim too high either.
55
Push it to 4%, and prices double every 18 years.
56
Businesses can't forecast their cost, and nobody can price a long-term contract without guessing.
57
So 2% is that Goldilocks number, high enough to keep a cushion between the economy and catastrophe, low enough that you barely notice it on an ordinary Tuesday.
58
But actually hitting that number, year after year, is close to impossible.
59
It takes a balancing act so unforgiving, it would make Evel Knievel sweat.
60
And for the last few decades, the Fed made this balancing act look effortless.
61
We're just now finding out how easy it was, now that things have changed.
62
But before I get into that, a quick pause.
63
Because we've been talking about the big picture trends shaping the economy, but let's take a look at something much closer to home.
64
Your cell phone carrier.
65
For most traditional carriers, your data is the real business, and your data usually ends up in one of two places, either packaged up and sold to the highest bidder, or exposed in a data breach.
66
Which brings us to today's sponsor, CAPE.
67
CAPE does the opposite.
68
CAPE is America's privacy-first mobile carrier.
69
You get the same premium, reliable cell service you'd expect from any other carrier, except privacy Security and security are now included.
70
It starts when you sign up.
71
CAPE won't ask for your name, your social security number, or your address.
72
They only collect what's necessary to connect you.
73
Then comes the data your phone creates just by using it, like who you call and text.
74
While traditional carriers hoard this data for years, CAPE deletes that information after just 24 hours.
75
But that's not all.
76
There's also your phone number.
77
It's one of the most sensitive pieces of information about you, yet you're constantly forced to hand it out.
78
With CAPE's new secondary numbers feature, you get two additional encrypted phone numbers included in your plan, perfect for sign-ups, online shopping, and account verification.
79
CAPE lets you stay connected without having to compromise your privacy.
80
If you're interested in checking out CAPE, you can get 33% off your first six months using the link below.
81
Promo code CASUAL33.
82
Thank you to CAPE for sponsoring this video.
83
Now back to the Federal Reserve's World Class Balancing Act.
84
For the last few decades, we managed to control inflation.
85
The walk towards the 2% target looked effortless.
86
But it only looked effortless because the tightrope was 6 inches off the ground.
87
And the only reason we know that is because we've seen what the same walk looks like 60 feet up.
88
But I'm trying to be a more positive guy these days.
89
So before I show you the ugly, let me show you the good part.
90
Back when the Feds still had room to work with.
91
Let's rewind to the late 70s.
92
Inflation wasn't drifting anymore.
93
It was sprinting.
94
It peaked at over 13.5%.
95
At that pace, prices double in about nine years.
96
The dollar in your pocket was rotting while you held it, and every single person could feel it happening.
97
So who do you call when inflation is out of control?
98
No. Not Ghostbusters.
99
You call 6'7", cigar-smoking Paul Volcker, the kind of man who looks like he eats recessions for breakfast.
100
Volcker takes over as Fed chair in 1979 and does the one thing nobody else had the stomach for.
101
He drives interest rates to 20%.
102
He deliberately triggers not one recession, but two, back to back, strangling the money supply until inflation has nothing left to feed on.
103
It was so aggressive, it earned a name of its own, the Volcker Shock.
104
And it worked.
105
Inflation went from over 13.5% down to bottoming out under 2% in the late 80s.
106
So take a look at the timeline.
107
From 1980 to 1983, Volcker tightens monetary policy aggressively, triggers two back to back recessions and successfully drops inflation by more than 10 points.
108
Two years later, the United States enters the Great Moderation Era, a 23-year-long period defined by steady growth and historically low economic volatility.
109
Which raises the obvious question, the one probably forming in your head right now, if it worked for Volcker, why can't the Fed just run the same playbook again today?
110
It's because he had one advantage nobody talks about, the country could absorb the damage.
111
When Volcker first claimed the throne, the national debt was about a quarter the size of the economy.
112
By today's standards, pretty much nothing.
113
So when he drove rates to 20%, it was brutal, but it was clean.
114
Raising rates did the one thing he intended it to do, slam the brakes.
115
But that world is gone.
116
The national debt is now sitting around 100% of GDP, a one-to-one match with the entire economy.
117
The last time it was this high was the Second World War, but the number is only half of it.
118
The other half is what the number does.
119
When the Fed raises rates now, it presses down in two places at once.
120
The first is the breaks.
121
Higher rates, pricier loans, less borrowing and a slower economy.
122
Simple.
123
The second is hidden underneath and quietly emerges by accident.
124
Higher rates also mean the government pays more interest on what it already owes.
125
And that bill is not small.
126
Net interest is running around a trillion dollars a year, more than the entire military budget.
127
In 2021, interest ate about 9% of every dollar the federal government collected.
128
This year, it's 19%.
129
But those interest payments don't just vanish from the economy.
130
It lands in the hands of the pension funds, banks, foreign governments, and other investors who lent the US government money in the first place.
131
So every time the Fed raises rates to cool the economy down, it also raises the size of the check that gets written and paid out, which then gets spent, lended out,
132
or rolled into the next bond at the new higher rate.
133
Which basically means the same move that's supposed to pull money out of the economy starts quietly sending it back in.
134
So one foot presses the brake, the other one quietly presses the gas.
135
And the heavier the debt, the harder that second foot pushes.
136
At 25% of GDP, you barely feel it.
137
At 100%, both pedals are floored and the brake is wired to the accelerator.
138
Two economists saw this danger coming in 1981.
139
Thomas Sargent and Neil Wallace predicted it in one of the most influential macroeconomic papers of the last 50 years.
140
While the title doesn't exactly scream page turner, and it's not exactly the easiest read.
141
In fact, I'd probably rather watch paint dry than read through it a second time.
142
The stuff inside it is very interesting.
143
They warn that if the government never runs a surplus, the central bank can't make the debt smaller.
144
All it gets to decide is what form the debt takes, bonds or cash.
145
Those are the two options.
146
So when the Fed fights inflation, it's squeezing the cash side, which means the bond side has to grow to make up the difference.
147
And bonds pay interest.
148
So the longer the Fed holds the line, the faster that pile of debt compounds.
149
So the tightening that brings inflation down today is the same thing that forces somebody to print later.
150
Meaning the Fed isn't actually addressing the root of the problem.
151
They're not actually fighting the inflation, they're just postponing it.
152
And if you think this is just some doomer theory from 1981 with no bearing on today, well guess what?
153
A few weeks ago the new Fed chair Kevin Warsh launched five new task forces to tackle different economic problems.
154
One of them is an inflation frameworks task force to reassess how the Fed measures, understands, and responds to structural drivers of inflation.
155
Three people were picked to lead this team.
156
One of them is Thomas Sargent.
157
The man who co-wrote the paper from 45 years ago is
158
now being asked by the Fed to lead a team tackling the inflation issues.
159
So inflation is clearly a concern for the Federal Reserve.
160
But when you step outside and look around, it's quiet.
161
Gas got cheaper last month.
162
The headlines said cooling, you might even think this whole thing already sorted itself out.
163
But the thing people forget is the ground is always the last thing to shake.
164
By the time you feel an earthquake under your feet, the fault lines slipped a while ago and the impact's already on its way to you.
165
The inflation numbers you see in the headlines are that ground.
166
They move last.
167
Housing is the clearest example.
168
It's more than 35% of the entire basket the headline number is built on, and it's the slowest moving piece in it, because rents lock in for a year and reset in steps.
169
So a big chunk of today's reading is measuring pressure that was released months ago.
170
When the headlines say everything's calm, it's telling you the ground held.
171
Yesterday.
172
Waiting on the inflation number means finding out last.
173
You need to work backwards to get to the truth.
174
When you strip everything away, inflation is one thing, price is going up.
175
But a price only goes up if somebody actually pays the higher one.
176
And nobody pays more without having more to pay with.
177
So the money moves first.
178
Every time.
179
And there's a number that measures exactly that.
180
It's called M2.
181
It's one of the main ways economists measure how much money is sloshing around the system.
182
Think of it as all the cash within arm's reach of the economy.
183
After 2020, the line goes pretty much vertical.
184
The M2 money supply is currently growing at over 5.5% a year, the fastest pace since July 2022.
185
But money doesn't reappear on its own, somebody has to put it there.
186
So if inflation's the enemy, who exactly is quietly pumping fresh dollars back into the system?
187
The answer's the Federal Reserve.
188
To see how, you need to understand the least understood tool the Fed owns.
189
Forget interest rates for a second.
190
There's a second lever.
191
This one's hidden in the back of Jerome Powell's closet, and it only comes out in case of an emergency.
192
It's a literal money printer.
193
When the economy's dying, like in 2020, the Fed creates money out of thin air and uses it to buy bonds, pushing that new money into the system to keep it alive.
194
That flood of new money is called quantitative easing, and in the pandemic, they ran it harder than at any point in history.
195
The Fed's balance sheet went from around $4 trillion to nearly $9 trillion in about two years, leading to inflation spiking to over 9% in June 2022.
196
But when inflation caught fire, the Fed was forced to do something they've only done twice in its more than 100-year history.
197
They ran the money printer in reverse.
198
Instead of creating money to buy bonds, the Fed let the bonds it already held expire and didn't replace them.
199
Every month, a little less money in the system than the month before.
200
This policy is called quantitative tightening, and it started in June of 2022.
201
Over the next three and a half years, the Fed took more than $2.2 trillion off its balance sheet.
202
It worked well enough that the money supply itself contracted, which sounds minor, but it's not.
203
The last time the amount of money in the American economy meaningfully shrank was the Great Depression.
204
But you also can't tighten forever.
205
The United States financial system needs a certain amount of cash just sitting in it to function day to day, and if you drain past that line, things start breaking.
206
So on December 1st of last year, the Fed announced quantitative tightening was over.
207
They'd successfully taken out about half of the more than $5 trillion that was injected in the financial system during the pandemic.
208
But then Jerome Powell snuck back out of the closet and turned the engine back on.
209
Eleven days later, on December 12th, the Fed started buying bonds again, around $40 billion a month.
210
The balance sheet it spent three and a half years draining is now refilling.
211
So all this leaves us with a country running two very different stories at the same time.
212
The first one shows up in the monthly reports, the headline numbers.
213
That's the story everybody argues about, and you get a new story every 30 days.
214
The second runs underneath all of it, the structural stuff.
215
The Congressional Budget Office now estimates the deficit for this fiscal year will reach $1.4 trillion.
216
That's 5.8% of the entire economy and far above the previous 50-year average of 3.8%.
217
The total national debt is closing in on $40 trillion, and the interest we pay on that debt is now over a trillion dollars a year.
218
In 2021, interest ate about 9 cents out of every dollar the federal government collected.
219
This year it's 19.
220
It more than doubled in five years.
221
Interest is now the third largest line in the entire federal budget.
222
We spend more on it than we spend on the entire military.
223
The debt snowball is playing out exactly as Thomas Sargent and Neil Wallace warned.
224
So how do we actually fix this mess?
225
The best answer I've seen comes from the golden boy of the finance world, Warren Buffett.
226
He was asked how he would deal with the deficit.
227
Here's what he said.
228
I get in the deficit in five minutes.
229
How?
230
You just pass a law that says that anytime there's a deficit of more than 3% of GDP, all sitting members of Congress are ineligible for re-election.
231
Now you've got the incentives in the right place, right?
232
So it's capable of being done.
233
A law that bars every sitting member of Congress from re-election anytime the deficit runs past 3% of GDP.
234
He was laughing when he said it, but he's also completely right.
235
We have an incentives problem.
236
It's not just a problem on the left, or just a problem on the right.
237
It's an American problem.
238
Both parties do it.
239
Think about how somebody actually gets a job in Congress.
240
They campaign on promises, telling you they'll do this and that, because that's what wins.
241
Nobody builds a career in Congress promising people less, so the incentives only point one direction, spending more.
242
Which is how the national deficit has run past 3% of GDP for pretty much the entire 21st century.
243
It hasn't just been an expensive couple of years, it's structural spending.
244
We've been spending more than we bring in for a quarter of a century straight.
245
The problem with going down this path is, it compounds.
246
The more we borrow, the more interest we owe.
247
The more interest we owe, the more we have to borrow.
248
It's a never-ending, repeating cycle.
249
We're on an unsustainable path that will eventually have to come to an end.
250
And every year we put this off, the bill to deal with it just gets bigger.
251
I'm curious to hear where other people land on this.
252
Is this something we need to deal with now, or are people crashing out over nothing?
253
Drop a comment and let me know.
254
I'll be reading through them.
255
Maybe Buffett's plan is too extreme.
256
Or maybe it isn't extreme enough.
257
We can argue about the right solution all day, but what we can't argue about is that this doesn't fix itself.
258
Something eventually has to change.
App downloaden
Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken
AI UitspraakScoor elke zin
IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid
WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op
WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt
📺 Zelfde Kanaal
B23
The Stock Market Is Being Used as a Dumping Ground
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C12
To Save the Economy... We’re About to Break It
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C12
The $2.5 Trillion Credit Wave Nobody Sees Coming
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C12
it’s boring, but it’s what bursts the ai bubble
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C12
if war bad... why stocks go up?
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
C13
The World's Safest Market Is Breaking
Daily ConversationWorking Adults
B22
The Recession's Already Here… Open Your Eyes
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B25
The New American Housing Crisis Has Landed
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B23
The Stock Market is BROKEN (just accept it)
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C112
America Is Walking Into a Debt Spiral It Can't Stop
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B22
Something Feels Off About 2026...
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
C111
The AI Bubble Survives on $1.65 Trillion in Hidden Debt
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B21
Bitcoin Is a Brilliant Scam and I Can Prove It (Again)
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B23
Private Credit: The Secret Industry Taking Over Wall Street
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B21
Every Type of Investor Explained in 6 Minutes
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B23
Why The Dumbest Investors Win (it's not why you think)
Business EnglishWorking Adults
B22
Crypto Is a Brilliant Scam and I Can Prove It
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B24
The 1973 Stock Market Crash that Nobody Remembers
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
B24
The (Inevitable) United States Debt Crisis
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C14
The AI Bubble… We Need to Talk
Business EnglishUniversity StudentsWorking Adults
✨ Aanbevolen Video
B213
107 zinnen
Why can’t prices just stay the same?
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B22
117 zinnen
Why the Oil Crisis Is (Secretly) Good...
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C12
44 zinnen
How Long Can the Fed Hold On?
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B23
51 zinnen
Great Moments in Unintended Consequences: Yosemite Permits, Italy Superbonus, Salary Caps (Vol. 22)
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B22
268 zinnen
Trump’s Canada Tariffs Are Backfiring in Red States | The Week
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B21
271 zinnen
If you Don't Understand CREDIT, You Don't Understand Money
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B24
148 zinnen
How America's Debt Spiral Could Spark The Next Crisis
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B25
64 zinnen
Why One Income No Longer Pays For The American Dream
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B21
158 zinnen
Bonds Were Supposed to Crash the Market. Why Haven’t They?
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
C13
284 zinnen
Does Rent Control ACTUALLY Work? Obama’s Chief Economist Breaks it Down | The Brief
Business EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
B22
142 zinnen
The Internet Didn't Fail. It Was Taken.
American AccentBusiness EnglishDaily ConversationUniversity Students
Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les
Deze spreekles op niveau B2 is gebaseerd op de video “The Inflation Problem... It's Worse Than You Think”. Deze woorden komen het vaakst terug: inflation, Fed, rate, interest. Deze video bevat 258 zinnen en 3195 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 16:44. De spreker praat snel, ongeveer 191 woorden per minuut, dus reken op verbonden en ingeslikte klanken. 84% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden; de rest kun je beter vooraf bekijken.
Belangrijke woorden in deze video
De 15 moeilijkste woorden uit de video, met uitspraak en betekenis:
| Woord | Uitspraak | Betekenis |
|---|---|---|
| inflation zelfstandig naamwoord | /ɪnˈfleɪ.ʃən/ | inflatie |
| headline zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈhɛd.laɪn/ | kop |
| deficit zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈdɛfəsɪt/ | tekort, gat in de begroting |
| recession zelfstandig naamwoord | /ɹɪˈsɛʃn̩/ | terugtrekking, terugtocht |
| tighten werkwoord | /ˈtaɪ.tən/ | aandraaien, strakker maken |
| economist zelfstandig naamwoord | /iˈkɑ.nə.mɪst/ | econoom |
| effortless bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˈɛfə(ɹ)tlɪs/ | moeiteloos |
| pendulum zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈpɛnd͡ʒələm/ | slinger |
| quantitative bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˈkwɑn.təˌteɪ.tɪv/ | kwantitatief |
| incentive zelfstandig naamwoord | /ɪnˈsɛntɪv/ | drijfveer, aansporing |
| structural bijvoeglijk naamwoord | /ˈstɹʌk(t͡)ʃəɹəl/ | structureel |
| scoreboard zelfstandig naamwoord | scorebord | |
| printer zelfstandig naamwoord | /ˈpɹɪntɚ/ | drukker |
| borrow werkwoord | /ˈbɑɹ.oʊ/ | lenen, ontlenen |
| warn werkwoord | /woɹn/ | waarschuwen, verwittigen |
Phrasal verbs die je zult horen
| Woord | Betekenis |
|---|---|
| find out werkwoord | ontdekken, onderzoeken |
| check out werkwoord | onderzoeken |
| fall apart werkwoord | uiteenvallen, uit elkaar vallen |
| get off werkwoord | van ... afgaan |
| go down werkwoord | afdalen |
| pass down werkwoord | doorgeven |
| take over werkwoord | overnemen |
Zinnen om te herhalen
Korte, volledige zinnen uit de video die je in alledaagse gesprekken kunt gebruiken:
- They only collect what's necessary to connect you.
- There's also your phone number.
- I'll be reading through them.
Grammatica in deze video
De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:
| Structuur | In de video |
|---|---|
| Present perfect continuous have/has been + -ing — iets dat eerder begon en nog bezig is | we've been talking · We've been spending |
| Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doet | being told · is priced · being pushed |
| Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog telt | has now missed · have changed · we've seen |
| Betrekkelijke bijzinnen who / which + zin — extra informatie over een persoon of ding | man who looks · side, which means · man who co |
Uitspraak om op te letten
De spreker gebruikt 40 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals can't, doesn't, isn't. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.
- De “th”-klanken: underneath /ˌʌndɚˈniθ/, throne /θɹəʊ̯n/, mathematics /mæθ(.ə)ˈmæt.ɪks/, earthquake /ˈɝθkweɪk/
- De klanken “sh” en “zh”: inflation /ɪnˈfleɪ.ʃən/, recession /ɹɪˈsɛʃn̩/, structural /ˈstɹʌk(t͡)ʃəɹəl/, cushion /ˈkʊʃən/, verification /ˌvɛ.ɹə.fɪˈkeɪ.ʃən/
- Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: economist /iˈkɑ.nə.mɪst/, quantitative /ˈkwɑn.təˌteɪ.tɪv/, accelerator /əkˈsɛl.əˌɹeɪ.tɚ/, catastrophe /kəˈtæstɹəfi/, verification /ˌvɛ.ɹə.fɪˈkeɪ.ʃən/
Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:
- Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: quantitative /ˈkwɑn.təˌteɪ.tɪv/, incentive /ɪnˈsɛntɪv/, compound /ˈkɑmpaʊnd/, upward /ˈʌpwɚd/, backward /ˈbækwɚd/
- /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: slam /ˈslæm/, catastrophe /kəˈtæstɹəfi/, backward /ˈbækwɚd/, absorb /æbˈsɔɹb/, anchor /ˈæŋ.kəː/
- /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: diagnose /ˈdaɪ.əɡˌnoʊs/, cigar /sɪˈɡɑɹ/, regulate /ˈɹɛɡ.jə.leɪt/
Zo oefen je met deze video
- Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
- Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
- Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als inflation, headline, deficit.
Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?
Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.