Shadowing Practice: Why relationships in 2026 carry impossible expectations | Alain de Botton - Learn English Speaking with Video

Kies een oefenmodus

Elke modus opent een volledig scherm oefenruimte.

141 zinnen
Als zinnen te kort of te lang zijn, klik op Bewerken om ze aan te passen.
1
It used to be the case that when people found partners, they would do so according to fairly pragmatic considerations.
2
Couples were formed not by the individuals themselves, but by the wider society.
3
There were, if you like, dynastic marriages.
4
There was then a momentous change that occurs towards the end of the 18th century, that we now know as Romanticism.
5
And one of the central tenets of Romanticism is that each individual should be left to decide on their partner
6
by their own, the movements of their own heart.
7
It's a beautiful idea, it's a very liberating idea.
8
And let's put it plainly, It's been a disaster.
9
We are not any appreciably happier now in a romantic culture than we were in a dynastic culture. And why?
10
Because we live in a romantic culture that sees something adverse in planning
11
and thinking and reflecting too hard on the business of love and it's been a serious problem for humanity.
12
My name is Alain de Botton.
13
I'm a philosopher, psychotherapist and founder of the School of Life.
14
the unique challenge of modern gating.
15
We know in theory that love matters a lot.
16
It's in every pop song, it's the center of most religions.
17
We sometimes lose sight of what that word actually means.
18
It's really about connection.
19
And it is one of the most beautiful and one of the most complicated, of all phenomena Even though we think we've been around on this planet for a long time,
20
trying to figure things out, I'd say we were still at the dawn collectively.
21
of making sense of this phenomenon we call love, And it's no surprise that most people will go to their deathbeds thinking,
22
Not quite sure I've figured that side of life out.
23
At least many of us will.
24
still be grappling with some of the complexities of love by the time time runs out on us.
25
The most central kind of love that people are obsessed about, concerned about, is romantic love.
26
That is the intimate connection between two human beings who have a sexual Contact.
27
It's worth saying that there are other forms of love, We can love our children, we can love animals, we can love ideas,
28
we can love tables, chairs, clouds, all sorts of things.
29
We are capable of many forms of love.
30
But I'd say that when people sing about love, and when they cry about love,
31
it tends to be the love of one very special person we tend to call our soulmate, our partner.
32
It used to be the case that when people found partners, they would do so according to fairly pragmatic considerations.
33
in most nations, in most parts of the world, for most of history, Couples were formed not by the individuals themselves, but by the wider society,
34
families, the village, the court.
35
There were, if you like, dynastic marriages.
36
You would get together with somebody because they had a plow
37
and you had an ox and it seemed like a good match.
38
Or you were the Duke of Brabant and they were the Princess of Naples.
39
And that was seen as a wonderful union.
40
So you got together for reasons that were nothing to do with emotional compatibility.
41
There were a lot of tears, there was sadness, there was loneliness, it didn't seem to matter.
42
because relationships were seen to be about something else.
43
There was then a momentous change that occurs in, towards the end of the 18th century,
44
starting in Britain, France, Germany, parts of Italy, a revolution in feeling, that we now know as Romanticism.
45
And one of the central tenets of Romanticism is that each individual should be left to decide
46
on their partner by the movements of their own heart.
47
they should be left to decide for themselves.
48
It's a beautiful idea, It's a very...
49
a liberating idea, it should make a lot of sense.
50
And we have been in the Romantic age now for you know, 200 years, perhaps shorter, perhaps a little longer, that kind of time period.
51
And let's put it plainly: It's been a disaster.
52
We are not any appreciably happier now in a romantic culture than we were in a dynastic culture,
53
where marriages were made for dynastic reasons.
54
Why?
55
Because we have failed collectively to focus with enough intent on the difficulties that couples will have when they choose each other,
56
according to the movements of their own heart.
57
Look, I think a really key...
58
prejudice of the romantic worldview is that if love is working well, It should be following instinct.
59
There's been an enormous veneration Mr. Worship of instinct.
60
Love is described as a special feeling, not in a set of ideas, not a sense of rationally observable principles, but a feeling.
61
You either have the feeling or you don't.
62
You must be guided, by your feeling.
63
There's even a prejudice against language.
64
You know, true lovers shouldn't talk too much.
65
They should just feel the fluttering of their own hearts.
66
That's why music has a huge prestige.
67
higher than philosophy.
68
When we're in love, we don't want to read philosophical tracks, we want to hear love songs.
69
That is to do with our sense that emotion should be guiding us, not reason.
70
Reason is the enemy in the romantic worldview.
71
of truly happy relationships.
72
If you follow reason, that's cold, it may be calculating, it's unromantic.
73
And, you know, there are so many things that are considered unromantic.
74
and I would love to train our audience.
75
That every time something seems unromantic, Question it.
76
Is it truly unromantic?
77
If we define Romanticism, as the pursuit of a workable relationship.
78
On that basis, is it unromantic to talk about money?
79
Is it unromantic?
80
to think long and hard about childhood patterns of psychological development.
81
Is it anti -romantic? to spend a lot of time thinking about families and friends and compatibility at that level.
82
All these things, in my view, belong to a truly adequate way of surveying whether a couple should be together.
83
But I'm also aware that nowadays these things are considered very unromantic.
84
To live in a romantic culture, means to live in a culture that has a set of ideas about how good couples should form.
85
They should be formed by instinct, that everybody has a soulmate, that you'll recognize your soulmate by a special, flattery feeling, that you shouldn't be asked to account for that feeling,
86
you should simply go for it and marry in Vegas in two weeks
87
if that's what seizes you and that you should be able to
88
Communicate deeply with your partner without using language through that special medium of the heart, through the silence, Also that you shouldn't criticize your partner,
89
that true partners should love each other for who they really are, which means no desire to grow or change.
90
You just accept someone.
91
Couples in romantic culture will sometimes complain, "You're trying to change me." And this is seen as really offensive.
92
It's like, what?
93
You know, you complain to your friends.
94
My partner's trying to change me.
95
Oh, what an awful person.
96
This must be awful.
97
You must get out immediately.
98
If you went to an ancient Greek, if you went to Athens in 400 BC, And you said to an ancient Greek, what is love?
99
and where is the role of criticism, they would say, Love is a process of education.
100
It's the education of emotion.
101
And lovers should of course be able to pick each other up for things that they don't spot in one another.
102
And they should be trying to develop into the best version of themselves, rather than simply staying stuck in an admiration for who they are today.
103
The whole process should be dynamic.
104
become who you could be, not worship who you happen to be right now.
105
All of this sounds very strange in Romantic culture, which is why relationships are so difficult in our time.
106
Let's remember that a person's life satisfaction is determined by up to around 70 % by the quality of their personal relationships.
107
A Martian hearing that statistic visiting planet Earth would think, "Well, clearly earthlings, given the enormous role of love, will be spending 70 % of their money
108
and 70 % of their educational time working out how on earth this business of love works." Is that true?
109
No. We spend hardly any time rationally thinking about it.
110
None of us are made to sit through classes in attachment theory, classes in apology, classes in listening, classes in communication.
111
No, we're, you know, Physics is important.
112
Geography is important.
113
Don't get me wrong.
114
But is there no time for this given its role in our lives?
115
Do we really want to leave this to chance?
116
And the answer is yes. And why?
117
because we live in a romantic culture that sees something adverse in planning
118
and thinking and reflecting too hard on the business of love.
119
It's very deleterious, and it's been a serious problem for humanity.
120
One of the most powerful disseminators of romantic culture is art.
121
And by art, I mean all the leading artistic media.
122
Film, definitely.
123
You know, if you were learning about love from films you would be very confused.
124
And that's why many of us are confused, because films, and I include that television shows and other narrative forms, these things are hugely misleading.
125
They simply Do not show what a real relationship is like.
126
I mean, probably you can count on one hand, that the number of films that have accurately shown love.
127
I think one of the most accurate representations of love is Richard Linklater's Before Trilogy.
128
which ended up with Before Midnight.
129
It's a wonderful reckoning, really, with the real complexities of love.
130
But, you know, most films are not that.
131
Most films are blithe, are superficial, are...
132
not modest enough in showing us what's really going on between couples.
133
It's also stimulated through music, and music constantly It gives us little miniature stories about how love works.
134
And the music is terrific but it's not accurate to what's going on.
135
presses the wrong buttons.
136
Poetry, no one really reads poetry nowadays.
137
If they did, the problem exists in poetry too.
138
So We have so much media around.
139
and yet we're still so much strangers to ourselves, I would say that the single greatest, most misleading disseminator of ideas on love is
140
culture and art.
141
The problem is very heavily located there.

App downloaden

Alles wat je nodig hebt om vloeiend te spreken

AI UitspraakScoor elke zin
IPA OefeningBeheers elk geluid
WoordenschatBouw je woordenschat op
WoordenspelLeren terwijl je speelt

Zelfde Kanaal

FOR YOU

Aanbevolen Video

Woordenschat en spreektips bij deze les

Deze spreekles op niveau C1 is gebaseerd op de video “Why relationships in 2026 carry impossible expectations”. Deze woorden komen het vaakst terug: romantic, culture, partner, unromantic, feeling. Deze video bevat 141 zinnen en 1745 woorden om na te spreken. Het gesproken deel duurt 11:07. De spreker praat in een natuurlijk tempo van ongeveer 157 woorden per minuut, dicht bij een alledaags gesprek. 84% van de woorden hoort bij de 3.000 meest gebruikte Engelse woorden; de rest kun je beter vooraf bekijken.

Belangrijke woorden in deze video

De 15 moeilijkste woorden uit de video, met uitspraak en betekenis:

WoordUitspraakBetekenis
dynastic bijvoeglijk naamwoord/daɪˈnæstɪk/dynastiek
soulmate zelfstandig naamwoordsoulmate, zielsverwant
instinct zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈɪn.stɪŋkt/instinct
liberate werkwoord/ˈlɪbəˌɹeɪt/bevrijden
mislead werkwoord/mɪsˈliːd/misleiden
pragmatic bijvoeglijk naamwoord/pɹæɡˈmætɪk/pragmatisch
tenet zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈtɛnɪt/dogma, grondregel
worldview zelfstandig naamwoordwereldbeeld, wereldbeschouwing
compatibility zelfstandig naamwoord/kəmˌpætəˈbɪlɪti/compatibiliteit, overeenstemming
prejudice zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈpɹɛd͡ʒədɪs/vooroordeel
complexity zelfstandig naamwoord/kəmˈplɛk.sɪ.ti/ingewikkeldheid, complexiteit
blithe bijvoeglijk naamwoord/blaɪð/onverschillig
deathbed zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈdɛθˌbɛd/sterfbed, doodsbed
deleterious bijvoeglijk naamwoord/ˌdɛ.ləˈtɪɹ.i.əs/schadelijk
flattery zelfstandig naamwoord/ˈflæt.ɚ.i/vleierij

Phrasal verbs die je zult horen

WoordUitspraakBetekenis
work out werkwoord/ˌwɝk ˈaʊt/uitrekenen

Zinnen om te herhalen

Korte, volledige zinnen uit de video die je in alledaagse gesprekken kunt gebruiken:

  • You either have the feeling or you don't.
  • You know, true lovers shouldn't talk too much.
  • My partner's trying to change me.
  • Do we really want to leave this to chance?

Grammatica in deze video

De structuren die de spreker het meest gebruikt, met de exacte woorden uit de video:

StructuurIn de video
“Used to” used to + werkwoord — een vroegere gewoonte of toestand die niet meer kloptused to be
Lijdende vorm be + voltooid deelwoord — het gaat om wat er gebeurt, niet om wie het doetwere formed · should be left · was seen
Present perfect have/has + voltooid deelwoord — iets uit het verleden dat nu nog teltIt's been · we've been · I've figured
Betrekkelijke bijzinnen who / which + zin — extra informatie over een persoon of dingare, which means · culture, which is

Uitspraak om op te letten

De spreker gebruikt 19 samentrekkingen en verkorte vormen, zoals don't, shouldn't, we're. Spreek ze kort uit, zoals je ze hoort.

  • De “th”-klanken: blithe /blaɪð/, deathbed /ˈdɛθˌbɛd/, earthling /ˈɝθlɪŋ/
  • De klanken “sh” en “zh”: appreciably /əˈpɹiːʃi.əbli/, veneration /ˌvɛnəˈɹeɪʃən/, superficial /ˌsupɚˈfɪʃəl/, admiration /ˌæd.məˈɹeɪ.ʃən/
  • Lange woorden — let op de klemtoon: appreciably /əˈpɹiːʃi.əbli/, compatibility /kəmˌpætəˈbɪlɪti/, complexity /kəmˈplɛk.sɪ.ti/, deleterious /ˌdɛ.ləˈtɪɹ.i.əs/, observable /əbˈzɜː.və.bəl/

Klanken die Nederlandstaligen lastig vinden:

  • Stemhebbende eindmedeklinker — /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /v/ niet verscherpen: mislead /mɪsˈliːd/, deathbed /ˈdɛθˌbɛd/, criticize /ˈkɹɪtɪsaɪz/, prestige /pɹɛsˈtiːd͡ʒ/, seize /ˈsiːz/
  • /æ/ — opener dan de Nederlandse “e”: dynastic /daɪˈnæstɪk/, pragmatic /pɹæɡˈmætɪk/, compatibility /kəmˌpætəˈbɪlɪti/, adverse /ˈæd.və(ɹ)s/, flattery /ˈflæt.ɚ.i/
  • /g/ — een harde plofklank, geen Nederlandse “g”: pragmatic /pɹæɡˈmætɪk/, grapple /ˈɡɹæpəl/, geography /d͡ʒiˈɑɡɹəfi/

Zo oefen je met deze video

  1. Luister de hele video één keer zonder te spreken en noteer de woorden die je niet kent.
  2. Begin op 0,75× snelheid, spreek zin voor zin na en ga terug naar normale snelheid zodra het makkelijk gaat.
  3. Neem jezelf op en vergelijk met het origineel; let daarbij op woorden als dynastic, soulmate, instinct.

Wat is de Shadowing-techniek?

Shadowing is een wetenschappelijk onderbouwde taalleermethode die oorspronkelijk is ontwikkeld voor professionele tolkentraining en gepopulariseerd door polyglot Dr. Alexander Arguelles. De methode is eenvoudig maar krachtig: je luistert naar native Engelse audio en herhaalt het onmiddellijk hardop — als een schaduw die de spreker volgt met slechts 1–2 seconden vertraging. In tegenstelling tot passief luisteren of grammaticadrills, dwingt shadowing je hersenen en mondspieren om echte spraakpatronen tegelijkertijd te verwerken en te reproduceren. Onderzoek toont aan dat het de uitspraaknauwkeurigheid, intonatie, ritme, verbonden spraak, luisterbegrip en spreekvaardigheid aanzienlijk verbetert — waardoor het een van de meest effectieve methoden is voor IELTS Speaking-voorbereiding en echte Engelse communicatie.

Shadowing-techniek: lees de volledige stap-voor-stap-gids →