쉐도잉 연습: Why relationships in 2026 carry impossible expectations | Alain de Botton - 영상으로 영어 말하기 배우기

연습 모드 선택

각 모드는 전체 화면 연습실로 열립니다.

141 문장
문장이 너무 짧거나 길면 Edit를 눌러 조정하세요.
1
It used to be the case that when people found partners, they would do so according to fairly pragmatic considerations.
2
Couples were formed not by the individuals themselves, but by the wider society.
3
There were, if you like, dynastic marriages.
4
There was then a momentous change that occurs towards the end of the 18th century, that we now know as Romanticism.
5
And one of the central tenets of Romanticism is that each individual should be left to decide on their partner
6
by their own, the movements of their own heart.
7
It's a beautiful idea, it's a very liberating idea.
8
And let's put it plainly, It's been a disaster.
9
We are not any appreciably happier now in a romantic culture than we were in a dynastic culture. And why?
10
Because we live in a romantic culture that sees something adverse in planning
11
and thinking and reflecting too hard on the business of love and it's been a serious problem for humanity.
12
My name is Alain de Botton.
13
I'm a philosopher, psychotherapist and founder of the School of Life.
14
the unique challenge of modern gating.
15
We know in theory that love matters a lot.
16
It's in every pop song, it's the center of most religions.
17
We sometimes lose sight of what that word actually means.
18
It's really about connection.
19
And it is one of the most beautiful and one of the most complicated, of all phenomena Even though we think we've been around on this planet for a long time,
20
trying to figure things out, I'd say we were still at the dawn collectively.
21
of making sense of this phenomenon we call love, And it's no surprise that most people will go to their deathbeds thinking,
22
Not quite sure I've figured that side of life out.
23
At least many of us will.
24
still be grappling with some of the complexities of love by the time time runs out on us.
25
The most central kind of love that people are obsessed about, concerned about, is romantic love.
26
That is the intimate connection between two human beings who have a sexual Contact.
27
It's worth saying that there are other forms of love, We can love our children, we can love animals, we can love ideas,
28
we can love tables, chairs, clouds, all sorts of things.
29
We are capable of many forms of love.
30
But I'd say that when people sing about love, and when they cry about love,
31
it tends to be the love of one very special person we tend to call our soulmate, our partner.
32
It used to be the case that when people found partners, they would do so according to fairly pragmatic considerations.
33
in most nations, in most parts of the world, for most of history, Couples were formed not by the individuals themselves, but by the wider society,
34
families, the village, the court.
35
There were, if you like, dynastic marriages.
36
You would get together with somebody because they had a plow
37
and you had an ox and it seemed like a good match.
38
Or you were the Duke of Brabant and they were the Princess of Naples.
39
And that was seen as a wonderful union.
40
So you got together for reasons that were nothing to do with emotional compatibility.
41
There were a lot of tears, there was sadness, there was loneliness, it didn't seem to matter.
42
because relationships were seen to be about something else.
43
There was then a momentous change that occurs in, towards the end of the 18th century,
44
starting in Britain, France, Germany, parts of Italy, a revolution in feeling, that we now know as Romanticism.
45
And one of the central tenets of Romanticism is that each individual should be left to decide
46
on their partner by the movements of their own heart.
47
they should be left to decide for themselves.
48
It's a beautiful idea, It's a very...
49
a liberating idea, it should make a lot of sense.
50
And we have been in the Romantic age now for you know, 200 years, perhaps shorter, perhaps a little longer, that kind of time period.
51
And let's put it plainly: It's been a disaster.
52
We are not any appreciably happier now in a romantic culture than we were in a dynastic culture,
53
where marriages were made for dynastic reasons.
54
Why?
55
Because we have failed collectively to focus with enough intent on the difficulties that couples will have when they choose each other,
56
according to the movements of their own heart.
57
Look, I think a really key...
58
prejudice of the romantic worldview is that if love is working well, It should be following instinct.
59
There's been an enormous veneration Mr. Worship of instinct.
60
Love is described as a special feeling, not in a set of ideas, not a sense of rationally observable principles, but a feeling.
61
You either have the feeling or you don't.
62
You must be guided, by your feeling.
63
There's even a prejudice against language.
64
You know, true lovers shouldn't talk too much.
65
They should just feel the fluttering of their own hearts.
66
That's why music has a huge prestige.
67
higher than philosophy.
68
When we're in love, we don't want to read philosophical tracks, we want to hear love songs.
69
That is to do with our sense that emotion should be guiding us, not reason.
70
Reason is the enemy in the romantic worldview.
71
of truly happy relationships.
72
If you follow reason, that's cold, it may be calculating, it's unromantic.
73
And, you know, there are so many things that are considered unromantic.
74
and I would love to train our audience.
75
That every time something seems unromantic, Question it.
76
Is it truly unromantic?
77
If we define Romanticism, as the pursuit of a workable relationship.
78
On that basis, is it unromantic to talk about money?
79
Is it unromantic?
80
to think long and hard about childhood patterns of psychological development.
81
Is it anti -romantic? to spend a lot of time thinking about families and friends and compatibility at that level.
82
All these things, in my view, belong to a truly adequate way of surveying whether a couple should be together.
83
But I'm also aware that nowadays these things are considered very unromantic.
84
To live in a romantic culture, means to live in a culture that has a set of ideas about how good couples should form.
85
They should be formed by instinct, that everybody has a soulmate, that you'll recognize your soulmate by a special, flattery feeling, that you shouldn't be asked to account for that feeling,
86
you should simply go for it and marry in Vegas in two weeks
87
if that's what seizes you and that you should be able to
88
Communicate deeply with your partner without using language through that special medium of the heart, through the silence, Also that you shouldn't criticize your partner,
89
that true partners should love each other for who they really are, which means no desire to grow or change.
90
You just accept someone.
91
Couples in romantic culture will sometimes complain, "You're trying to change me." And this is seen as really offensive.
92
It's like, what?
93
You know, you complain to your friends.
94
My partner's trying to change me.
95
Oh, what an awful person.
96
This must be awful.
97
You must get out immediately.
98
If you went to an ancient Greek, if you went to Athens in 400 BC, And you said to an ancient Greek, what is love?
99
and where is the role of criticism, they would say, Love is a process of education.
100
It's the education of emotion.
101
And lovers should of course be able to pick each other up for things that they don't spot in one another.
102
And they should be trying to develop into the best version of themselves, rather than simply staying stuck in an admiration for who they are today.
103
The whole process should be dynamic.
104
become who you could be, not worship who you happen to be right now.
105
All of this sounds very strange in Romantic culture, which is why relationships are so difficult in our time.
106
Let's remember that a person's life satisfaction is determined by up to around 70 % by the quality of their personal relationships.
107
A Martian hearing that statistic visiting planet Earth would think, "Well, clearly earthlings, given the enormous role of love, will be spending 70 % of their money
108
and 70 % of their educational time working out how on earth this business of love works." Is that true?
109
No. We spend hardly any time rationally thinking about it.
110
None of us are made to sit through classes in attachment theory, classes in apology, classes in listening, classes in communication.
111
No, we're, you know, Physics is important.
112
Geography is important.
113
Don't get me wrong.
114
But is there no time for this given its role in our lives?
115
Do we really want to leave this to chance?
116
And the answer is yes. And why?
117
because we live in a romantic culture that sees something adverse in planning
118
and thinking and reflecting too hard on the business of love.
119
It's very deleterious, and it's been a serious problem for humanity.
120
One of the most powerful disseminators of romantic culture is art.
121
And by art, I mean all the leading artistic media.
122
Film, definitely.
123
You know, if you were learning about love from films you would be very confused.
124
And that's why many of us are confused, because films, and I include that television shows and other narrative forms, these things are hugely misleading.
125
They simply Do not show what a real relationship is like.
126
I mean, probably you can count on one hand, that the number of films that have accurately shown love.
127
I think one of the most accurate representations of love is Richard Linklater's Before Trilogy.
128
which ended up with Before Midnight.
129
It's a wonderful reckoning, really, with the real complexities of love.
130
But, you know, most films are not that.
131
Most films are blithe, are superficial, are...
132
not modest enough in showing us what's really going on between couples.
133
It's also stimulated through music, and music constantly It gives us little miniature stories about how love works.
134
And the music is terrific but it's not accurate to what's going on.
135
presses the wrong buttons.
136
Poetry, no one really reads poetry nowadays.
137
If they did, the problem exists in poetry too.
138
So We have so much media around.
139
and yet we're still so much strangers to ourselves, I would say that the single greatest, most misleading disseminator of ideas on love is
140
culture and art.
141
The problem is very heavily located there.

앱 다운로드

유창하게 말하는 데 필요한 모든 것

AI 발음 평가문장마다 점수 확인
IPA 발음 연습모든 소리 마스터
단어 학습나만의 단어장 만들기
단어 게임놀면서 외우기

같은 채널

FOR YOU

추천 영상

맥락 및 배경

알랭 드 보통은 현대의 사랑과 인간 관계에 대한 복잡성을 깊이 탐구하는 철학자이자 심리치료사입니다. 그의 강연에서는 18세기 말의 낭만주의가 개인의 사랑 선택을 어떻게 변화시켰는지와 그로 인해 발생한 사회적 문제를 다루고 있습니다. 드 보통은 사람들이 사랑과 관계에 대해 얼마나 잘못된 믿음을 갖고 있는지를 조명하며, 더 나은 관계를 위한 사고와 대화의 중요성을 강조합니다. 이 강연을 통해 영어를 배우는 사람들은 사랑과 관계에 대한 심도 있는 이해를 통해 일상 대화에서 활용할 수 있는 유용한 표현을 배울 수 있습니다.

일상 대화에 유용한 5개 표현

  • "What is love?" - 사랑이란 무엇인가?
  • "It's been a disaster." - 재앙이었다.
  • "We live in a romantic culture." - 우리는 낭만적인 문화 속에 살고 있다.
  • "Love is about connection." - 사랑은 연결에 관한 것이다.
  • "It should be dynamic." - 그것은 역동적이어야 한다.

이 표현들은 사랑과 관계에 대한 논의에서 자주 사용되며, 유튜브 영어 공부와 같은 자원을 통해 자연스럽게 익힐 수 있습니다. 이를 활용한 영어 회화 연습은 의사소통 능력을 향상시키는데 크게 기여할 것입니다.

단계별 쉐도잉 가이드

이 강연의 내용을 효과적으로 익히기 위해 몇 가지 단계로 나누어 연습해 보세요:

  1. 1단계: 들으며 따라하기 - 처음에는 전체 강연을 들어보며 알랭 드 보통의 발음을 주의 깊게 들어보세요. 그의 영어 발음 교정에 도움이 될 것입니다.
  2. 2단계: 반복하기 - 강연을 10초 또는 15초 간격으로 나누어 듣고, 그 후 각 구간을 따라 말해보세요. 이 방법이 영어 쉐도잉 기법의 핵심입니다.
  3. 3단계: 의도 파악하기 - 각 표현의 의미와 사용 맥락을 이해하려고 노력하세요. 이 과정을 통해 언어의 뉘앙스를 배울 수 있습니다.
  4. 4단계: 나만의 문장 만들기 - 강연에서 배운 표현들을 사용하여 나만의 문장을 만들어 보세요. 개인적인 경험이나 의견을 추가하면 더욱 유익합니다.
  5. 5단계: 친구와 함께 연습하기 - 친구와 함께 이 표현들로 대화를 나누어보세요. 실제 상황에서의 연습은 영어 회화 능력을 강화하는데 큰 도움이 됩니다.

이렇게 단계별로 진행하면 드 보통의 인사이트를 통해 깊이 있는 영어 학습이 가능합니다. 더욱 효과적인 언어 학습을 위해 지속적으로 실습해 보시기 바랍니다.

이 영상의 문법

화자가 가장 많이 쓰는 문형을 영상 속 실제 표현과 함께 정리했습니다.

문형영상 속 표현
“used to” used to + 동사 — 지금은 아닌 과거의 습관이나 상태used to be
수동태 be + 과거분사 — 누가 하는지보다 무슨 일이 일어나는지에 초점were formed · should be left · was seen
현재완료 have/has + 과거분사 — 과거의 일이 지금도 관련이 있을 때It's been · we've been · I've figured
관계절 who / which + 절 — 사람이나 사물에 대한 추가 정보are, which means · culture, which is

쉐도잉이란? 영어 실력을 빠르게 키우는 과학적 방법

쉐도잉(Shadowing)은 원래 전문 통역사 훈련을 위해 개발된 언어 학습 기법으로, 다언어 학자인 Dr. Alexander Arguelles에 의해 대중화된 방법입니다. 핵심 원리는 간단하지만 매우 강력합니다: 원어민의 영어를 들으면서 1~2초의 짧은 지연으로 즉시 소리 내어 따라 말하는 것——마치 '그림자(shadow)'처럼 화자를 따라가는 것입니다. 문법 공부나 수동적인 청취와 달리, 쉐도잉은 뇌와 입 근육이 동시에 실시간으로 영어를 처리하고 재현하도록 훈련합니다. 연구에 따르면 이 방법은 발음 정확도, 억양, 리듬, 연음, 청취력, 말하기 유창성을 크게 향상시킵니다. IELTS 스피킹 준비와 자연스러운 영어 소통을 원하는 분들에게 특히 효과적입니다.

섀도잉 방법: 단계별 전체 가이드 읽기 →