Luyện nói tiếng Anh bằng Shadowing qua video: Stop Over-Explaining: The 3 S’s Rule For Projecting Authority

You can be the smartest person in the room

⏸ Tạm dừng

Tốc độ:

415 câu

Nếu các câu quá ngắn hoặc quá dài, hãy bấm Edit để chỉnh sửa.

You can be the smartest person in the room

and still sound dumb and lose the room entirely because of the way you speak.

And I should know because I have had it happen to me too.

So today I am breaking down the speaking patterns that quietly sabotage us,

especially high achievers from founders and CEOs to everyday humans just tired of not getting heard.

And once you know these,

you'll start noticing them everywhere.

I'm Cody Sanchez and this is The Big Deal Podcast.

This is how you get attention like a CEO.

All right, let's go to trap number one, excessive hedging.

People ignore everything you say before the word but.

Did you know that?

So if you say, I could be totally off here,

but, and then you drop a perfectly solid point,

neuroscience finds you're going to get ignored.

And this is actually, there's a word for this.

It's called linguistic hedging, and it's killing your competency score.

So every single human immediately,

when we meet another one,

gets graded on two things, mainly warmth and competency.

If you want to be listened to,

you better be competent, even above being warm in the world of business.

So the research on linguistic hedging shows that excessive qualifiers reduce perceived competence and authority,

especially in high status environments.

To say that in English,

if you use, but I don't know,

maybe, could be, I'm not sure,

prepared to be pushed around like a ragdoll,

even when the content quality of what you say is unchanged.

So you could be saying really smart things,

but you're going to be tossed.

There's this classic persuasion finding where speakers who presented arguments confidently were rated as more credible.

Okay, that kind of makes sense,

even when their arguments were identical to more hesitant versions.

But a really scary study,

they did a follow-on study that showed people who argued more confidently

but were wrong were rated even more credible than those who argued not confidently but were right.

So confidence is actually a heuristic.

People don't consciously score your logic.

They score your certainty.

So why do smart people do this then?

Why do we hedge?

Because you're aware of the complexity.

You know, you and I both know reality is kind of probabilistic.

And, you know, so we hedge.

You don't want to sound like some sort of sycophant out there saying everyone should do this.

You always do this.

This never works because that's not realistic.

But the problem, do you want to win or do you want to be right?

And now here's some important nuance.

Hedging isn't always bad, but it largely is.

I mean, there's something called strategic hedging,

which signals, hey, I'm intellectually honest,

but most hedging you're doing is insecurity hedging,

which signals I'm scared of being judged.

You know, let's be honest.

What are we usually doing?

We're probably more scared of being judged than really strategically thinking about how to hedge.

So let me show you the difference between the two.

Let's say I say, I think we should move forward with point A.

However, we have to take into account that there is a 30% failure rate.

If we do that, that could be an issue.

As opposed to, I want to move forward with point A,

but you know, there's always a chance that it's not going to work.

And I mean, I can't guarantee it 100%.

Which one sounds more serious?

Obviously, the first one.

I gave numbers.

I stated things as opposed to questioning things.

So here's the test.

Are you adding nuance for clarity or are you padding your statement to avoid social risk?

Okay, so how do we fix this?

How do we make you sound smart and people pay attention to you?

Instead of saying, I might be wrong,

but I think we should cut this feature.

I want you to say,

based on the data we have,

cutting this feature is the right move.

And if you want to be even better,

say what the data is.

Based on the data we have,

we believe with a 70% probability,

this is the right move.

Give numbers and specifics.

So this is the same thought,

but just a slightly different posture.

I want you to avoid excessive hedging because it's making people stop paying attention to you.

Steve Job was famous for being the opposite of this.

He'd have one sentence that tells you what to think.

I call it his Twitter length headline.

So he'd have one for the whole talk or product.

So maybe like, today, Apple is going to reinvent the phone.

This is the world's thinnest notebook,

an entire library of songs in your pocket, right?

Everything else was proof of that one line,

one idea repeated, no hedging.

The second trap is over-explaining.

Smart people love clarity and they hate being misunderstood.

So they explain, then they clarify,

100

then they get an example,

101

then they restate the example,

102

then they summarize the summary.

103

Yikes, what happens?

104

You signal one of two things.

105

Your audience is either slow or you think your idea can't stand on its own and neither is gonna help your credibility.

106

There's nothing more infuriating to a competent person than having somebody over explain an idea they already got on the first sentence.

107

So if you really want to piss off somebody with ADD,

108

OCD, and high competence, then explain yourself a lot.

109

I hate to say it,

110

this isn't PC, but ladies,

111

we do this more than men.

112

And we have to work on it if we want to be taken seriously.

113

There's actual real research in cognitive psychology that has identified something called processing fluency.

114

So when something is easy to understand,

115

people judge it as more truthful and more intelligent.

116

So ironically, over-explaining actually reduces is your fluency.

117

It makes simple things feel heavy.

118

And you've seen this.

119

Like someone explains a concept for five minutes and you think,

120

what is this guy talking about?

121

Like the idea could be good,

122

but the delivery, well, that makes everything else get tossed out the window.

123

So what's the fix?

124

I want you to deliver the core idea concisely.

125

Pause.

126

Let silence do the work.

127

If someone wants more depth, they'll ask.

128

Authority ends up trusting the listener.

129

So let me give you an example, two explanations.

130

Low fluency.

131

Our vertically integrated infrastructure leverages synergistic distribution pathways to optimize cross-sector capital allocation.

132

Don't we all know somebody who talks like that, by the way?

133

That's low fluency.

134

High fluency.

135

We buy boring businesses that make money.

136

Which one sounds smarter?

137

Actually, the second one.

138

Which one feels more trustworthy?

139

Number two.

140

Which one gets remembered?

141

Sure as hell, number two because smart people take complex things

142

and make it simple and it's not about this cognitive load

143

or using a bunch of vowels another fascinating study if

144

if you look at stocks with easy names researchers found

145

that companies with the easiest to pronounce names like car outperformed

146

those with hard to pronounce names like rdo naming actually matters

147

and in marketing this is really true this is why apple ads work so well think about them simple background minimal text,

148

one product, clear headline.

149

What do they do?

150

That reduces your cognitive load.

151

You don't have to think so hard.

152

Your brain just goes, that makes sense and it must be premium.

153

And it makes, you know,

154

processing fluency basically makes simple look smart.

155

And there's some dangerous sides to this.

156

Like it can make bad ideas look good.

157

That's why scams use simple language and conspiracy theories spread wildly.

158

It's why charismatic leaders will win.

159

We all know one, right?

160

You know one right now who is not as smart as you,

161

not as good as you,

162

but often wins because they're smoother.

163

And so how do you use this ethically?

164

If you wanna sound more intelligent,

165

we want shorter sentences, we want concrete nouns,

166

no jargon, white space, speak slower, remove filter words.

167

This is one of those ideas that quietly runs the world.

168

So keep it stupid, simple.

169

Trap three, talking too fast when it matters.

170

Ever seen someone's pitch get higher?

171

Their words speed up, their breath shortens, why?

172

their nervous system is firing

173

when we're anxious the sympathetic nervous system it activates that's like

174

your heart rate rises breathing shifts speech accelerates listeners unconsciously interpret

175

that speed as uncertainty even

176

if actually you know what the fuck you're talking about you just talk fast like i do

177

so studies on vocal perception show

178

that slower lower paced speech is actually associated with higher status and greater credibility now you got to be careful here

179

Because when you're talking to your boss,

180

don't try to be profound.

181

You want to make sure you are tied to the right timing.

182

But when you rush your most important points,

183

you subconsciously signal, I need to get through this before you reject it.

184

What's the fix?

185

When you reach your most important sentence, slow down by 20%.

186

Add micropauses.

187

Breathe before the key line.

188

For example, instead of saying,

189

so what I'm saying is we should pivot the whole strategy because the data is clearly showing diminishing returns.

190

Try.

191

I think we should pivot.

192

The data is showing diminishing returns.

193

You can make everything fast up until then,

194

but when you've got your plane to land, land it.

195

I want you to remember the three S's.

196

Shorter, slower, stronger.

197

They use this on us in advertising.

198

Like, listen to the speed of this part of the Apple speech.

199

Think different.

200

Here's to the crazy ones.

201

Here's to the crazy ones.

202

The misfits.

203

the rebels, the troublemakers, the round pegs in the square holes,

204

the ones who see things differently.

205

They're not fond of rules and they have no respect for the status quo.

206

You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them.

207

About the only thing you can't do is ignore them because they change things.

208

they push the human race forward.

209

While some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius.

210

Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world are the ones who do.

211

They basically relaunched Apple's brand around creativity and non-conformity,

212

but done really cleanly, slowly, and strategically.

213

Trap four, story, not specs.

214

So I'm using Steve Jobs a lot in this because he's one of my favorite entrepreneurs,

215

but also because he's one of the best of all time.

216

And he is one of the best speakers ever,

217

so we should steal his homework.

218

And I think he followed a simple arc.

219

Status quo to problem, to bold promise,

220

to proof, to the future.

221

So he would start with words like the world before,

222

you know, phones are clunky, laptops are heavy.

223

Then he'd raise the stakes to make a clear promise.

224

But in the future, you will hold all of the songs in your pocket.

225

Then he would show the solution live.

226

Bam, show, don't tell.

227

because people remember the story change, not the feature list.

228

So you see, when you lead with ruthless simplicity,

229

you can actually tell a story.

230

Steed's slides and language were stripped down,

231

few words on screen, big visuals, almost no bullets.

232

I want you to think of short,

233

concrete phrases instead of jargon, like, it just works.

234

Or once on stage, he's just said, gorgeous.

235

Because the story was simple,

236

the audience, they had the bandwidth to feel it in their brain.

237

One of my favorites on jobs was a speech that he gave on connecting dots at Stanford.

238

And he has a couple lines I love.

239

He's talking about when he does calligraphy and he learns computing

240

and coding and he puts them together and he creates maybe the world's most valuable company.

241

And he says, you have to trust in something,

242

your gut, destiny, life, karma,

243

whatever, because believing

244

that the dots will connect down the road will give you the confidence to follow your heart even

245

when it leads you off the well-worn path.

246

That will make all the difference.

247

Trap five, being a show-off.

248

This one hurts because it's actually hard for me.

249

It's really tempting to play it cool.

250

You should actually be a show-off.

251

The people who win in life are not the ones in the shadows.

252

They are the ones who actually demonstrate what they do.

253

I was just on a podcast with Bill Gurley,

254

one of the best investors of all time,

255

and he told me something fascinating about the founder of WeWork, Adam Newman.

256

He said when he first met him in a series A,

257

so the company basically had nothing in existence,

258

his company benchmark had never done a real estate transaction.

259

That's what this guy was asking him to do.

260

But he goes, within the first few minutes,

261

I knew I was going to invest in Adam and I was going to invest millions because he was such a showman.

262

Think about who the president is right now,

263

whether you like him or hate him.

264

Donald Trump is a showman.

265

Think about who's the richest man in the world right now,

266

whether you like him or hate him.

267

Elon Musk is a showman.

268

So you actually need to flex.

269

You know more than most people in the room.

270

You've read the research.

271

You understand the second order effects.

272

You're smarter than you're giving yourself credit for.

273

So flex it.

274

I don't want you to reference obscure frameworks.

275

I don't want you to add theoretical layers that aren't necessary because I want you to get recognized.

276

But research on the illusion of explanatory depth and communication shows that the simpler you are,

277

the more intelligent you are perceived.

278

So the smartest communicators, they actually reduce complexity.

279

They don't amplify it.

280

Einstein supposedly said, if you can't explain it simply,

281

you don't understand it well enough.

282

Whether he said it or not, I think it's true.

283

Smart, insecure speakers try to prove they're smart.

284

Secure, smart speakers make everyone else feel smart.

285

Think about that for a second.

286

That's the power.

287

So here's the fix.

288

Go big and show, but default to the show being simple.

289

Clarity beats cleverness every time.

290

Trap six, obsessive rehearsal.

291

Most people think great speakers are born with it.

292

They are not.

293

They are the ones willing to rehearse more than is reasonable.

294

Psychologist Anders Ericsson spent decades studying world-class performers like violinists,

295

chess players, athletes, surgeons, all of it.

296

And his conclusion, and uncomfortable for everyone who likes the idea of quote-unquote talent,

297

the main difference between the elite and the average wasn't who they were.

298

It's how they practice.

299

By age 20, the best violinist in his studies had put in more than 10,000 hours of focused practice.

300

The merely good ones had about 4,000.

301

Same instrument, same age, totally different outcomes.

302

And later research really refined the picture.

303

Practice isn't the only factor, like deliberate practice.

304

That explains roughly one fifth to one quarter of the performance gap between pros and amateurs.

305

In other words, if you line up a hundred people,

306

a big part of why the top five look superhuman is they simply have done it more on purpose for longer.

307

Public speaking, no different.

308

Speaking well every day, no different.

309

You know, the speakers who don't rehearse are the ones who ramble,

310

run out of time,

311

and have a voice in their head telling them that they're not saying the right things coming out of their mouth.

312

The ones who run the talk out loud multiple times,

313

well, they're calm and clear, baby.

314

So when you watch someone who seems effortlessly good on stage,

315

you're actually seeing something else entirely.

316

Hours of practice, hours of cutting out weak examples,

317

hours of practicing the pause after the key line

318

so i don't want you to feel like you either have talent

319

or you don't you can make it and

320

if you want to see nobody better go look at steve

321

jobs i mean one of the best speakers of all time but did you know

322

he would say the natural delivery he engineered it people inside apple say he rehearsed keynotes allowed for hours

323

and even was so specific down to fonts and demo beats.

324

Because the material was internalized,

325

he could look at people,

326

move, and improvise around this sort of solid spine of his speeches.

327

But, you know, the best shorthand for how he speaks

328

and why he's heard is the fact that he practiced for a really long time.

329

Trap seven, constant self-deprecation.

330

This one is common among us high performers.

331

You joke about being bad at things.

332

You downplay wins.

333

You undercut compliments.

334

I know sometimes it feels humble and maybe sometimes it is,

335

but overuse of this is nothing but self-sabotage.

336

So research on impression management shows that strategic modesty works when balanced with being super competent.

337

But the problem is chronic self-deprecation actually lowers your perceived ability,

338

especially among people who don't know you yet.

339

So there's actually a fabulous study on self-promotion versus modesty in job interviews.

340

It's by Godfrey Jones and Lohr.

341

And what they studied, the researchers wanted to test how different self-preservation strategies affect how people perceive you.

342

Like does modesty increase likability, for instance?

343

So how did they do it?

344

The participants acted as evaluators in a mock hiring scenario.

345

They watched videotaped job interviews where applicants use different communication strategies,

346

self-promotion, ingratiation modesty, neutral controlled condition.

347

The actors delivered identical qualifications, no different, right?

348

Same resume, same background, same everything,

349

except the style of delivery changed.

350

After watching, evaluators rated the candidates on competence, likability, hireability.

351

What do you think happened?

352

Self-promotion, increased ratings of competence,

353

intelligence, and recommendations for hiring.

354

Slight decrease in likability, if too strong, but not that much.

355

Ingratiation and modesty increased likability,

356

but actually didn't increase competence,

357

reduced perceived capability, and also reduced likelihood of them being referred for hire.

358

The key insight, strategic self-promotion actually gets you hired.

359

You being modest isn't helping anybody else but your competitors.

360

And, you know, I really want you to think about this

361

because a lot of times somebody will give you a compliment like,

362

you did a great job.

363

That was a great presentation.

364

And you reply, honestly, I totally winged it.

365

It was kind of a mess.

366

You just rewrote their perception.

367

Upgrade move, accept the praise.

368

Thank you.

369

That's it.

370

You don't need to shrink to be likable.

371

Confidence with warmth is magnetic.

372

Insecurity disguised as humor, nothing but transparent.

373

So the pattern behind all these traps,

374

if we're going to zoom out,

375

is fear of social rejection,

376

being wrong, fear of being judged, not being liked.

377

Smart people feel this more because you actually see all the complexity of this.

378

Oh, to be a beautiful idiot, right?

379

You know how much you don't know.

380

And so here's the paradox.

381

The people who win rooms aren't the ones who know the most.

382

They're the ones who manage perception of others best.

383

And perception is heavily influenced by delivery, not just content.

384

It's not about pretending.

385

It's not like the fake alpha energy.

386

It's really about aligning to how you can get the outcome you want.

387

Your job isn't to pre-defend against every possible criticism.

388

It's to communicate clearly and let your ideas stand.

389

And so I want you to ask yourself a couple questions.

390

A simple speaking reset framework.

391

Before important conversations, run this checklist.

392

Am I hedging unnecessarily?

393

Am I over-explaining?

394

Am I rushing?

395

Am I over-complicating?

396

Am I landing statements confidently?

397

Am I comfortable with silence?

398

Pick one thing to improve per week.

399

Don't try to fix everything at once.

400

awareness alone is gonna upgrade you 15,

401

20, 30% because practice actually will help you upgrade the rest.

402

Most smart people are not held back because you're dumb.

403

You're held back because how that intelligence is delivered.

404

If you fix the delivery,

405

suddenly the room treats you like the smartest person there because now you sound like it.

406

So if you wanna outperform your peers in anything that involve words,

407

there's a simple unfair advantage available to you.

408

Rehearse more than they do and rehearse with intent.

409

Run the talk through out loud,

410

fix one thing each time.

411

Do that obsessively and people will start calling you unnatural.

412

That's it for today and next time you're in a meeting,

413

listen for these traps.

414

You're gonna hear them everywhere.

415

And once you do, you'll come back here and we'll figure out your next step.

TRENDING

Phổ biến

Phương Pháp Shadowing Là Gì?

Shadowing là kỹ thuật học ngôn ngữ có cơ sở khoa học, ban đầu được phát triển cho chương trình đào tạo phiên dịch viên chuyên nghiệp và được phổ biến rộng rãi bởi nhà đa ngôn ngữ học Dr. Alexander Arguelles. Nguyên lý cốt lõi đơn giản nhưng cực kỳ hiệu quả: bạn nghe tiếng Anh của người bản xứ và lặp lại to ngay lập tức — như một "cái bóng" (shadow) đuổi theo người nói với độ trễ chỉ 1–2 giây. Khác với luyện ngữ pháp hay học từ vựng bị động, Shadowing buộc não bộ và cơ miệng phải đồng thời xử lý và tái tạo ngôn ngữ thực tế. Các nghiên cứu khoa học xác nhận phương pháp này cải thiện đáng kể phát âm, ngữ điệu, nhịp điệu, nối âm, kỹ năng nghe và độ lưu loát khi nói — đặc biệt hiệu quả cho người luyện IELTS Speaking và muốn giao tiếp tiếng Anh tự nhiên như người bản ngữ.

ShadowingEnglish.com – Luyện Nói Tiếng Anh Bằng Shadowing

Nói tiếng Anh lưu loát với phương pháp Shadowing — nghe người bản xứ, đọc theo từng câu, rèn phản xạ ngôn ngữ thật sự. Được hàng ngàn người học IELTS tin dùng.

Luyện nói tiếng Anh bằng Shadowing qua video: Stop Over-Explaining: The 3 S’s Rule For Projecting Authority

Phổ biến

Giới Thiệu Về Bài Học Này

Từ Vựng & Cụm Từ Chính

Mẹo Luyện Tập

Phương Pháp Shadowing Là Gì?

Luyện nói tiếng Anh bằng Shadowing qua video: Stop Over-Explaining: The 3 S’s Rule For Projecting Authority

Tải Ứng Dụng

Giới Thiệu Về Bài Học Này

Từ Vựng & Cụm Từ Chính

Mẹo Luyện Tập

Phương Pháp Shadowing Là Gì?